[Touch-packages] [Bug 2054924] Re: color emoji are broken with fontconfig 2.15

2024-02-25 Thread Jeremy Bícha
** Also affects: fonts-noto-color-emoji (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Changed in: fonts-noto-color-emoji (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided => High

** Changed in: fonts-noto-color-emoji (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Triaged

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to fontconfig in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2054924

Title:
  color emoji are broken with fontconfig 2.15

Status in Fontconfig:
  Fix Released
Status in fontconfig package in Ubuntu:
  Triaged
Status in fonts-noto-color-emoji package in Ubuntu:
  Triaged
Status in fontconfig package in Debian:
  New

Bug description:
  The Noto Color Emoji font is no longer used to show emoji. Many emoji
  no longer show and the few that do are not in color.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/fontconfig/+bug/2054924/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 2054908] Re: gpg-wks-server pulls in postfix

2024-02-25 Thread Jeremy Bícha
Ok, pulling in postfix is very disruptive since gpg-wks-client was
seeded in Ubuntu Desktop 22.04 LTS and 23.10 and several flavors.
postfix's install has a debconf prompt which is now allowed for the
default desktop install.

** Summary changed:

- gnupg is pulling in gpg-wks-server which pulls in postfix
+ gpg-wks-server pulls in postfix

** Changed in: ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided => High

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2054908

Title:
  gpg-wks-server pulls in postfix

Status in Auto Package Testing:
  New
Status in apt package in Ubuntu:
  Invalid
Status in gnupg2 package in Ubuntu:
  Invalid
Status in munin package in Ubuntu:
  Invalid
Status in ubuntu-release-upgrader package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  Example 1
  
  I did a sudo apt dist-upgrade today on my developer machine running Ubuntu 
Desktop 24.04 LTS and it surprisingly pulled in postfix.

  I did not built this into a full reproducible test case because I
  found another test case…

  Example 2
  
  munin's autopkgtests are now failing because postfix and gpg-wks-server is 
now unexpectedly being installed.

  https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/munin/noble/amd64

  Other Info
  
  gnupg2's changelog indicates that there was an attempt to avoid this 
misbehavior by having gnupg only Suggest gpg-wks-server. In fact, there is 
**nothing** in Ubuntu that Depends or Recommends gpg-wks-server.

  Notably, gnupg has
  Suggests: gpg-wks-server (<< 2.4.4-2ubuntu7.1~), gpg-wks-server (>= 
2.4.4-2ubuntu7)

  I don't recall ever seeing strict versioned Suggests before so it's my
  wild guess that apt does not strict handle versioned Suggests in the
  expected way.

  As a workaround, try dropping the versions from gnupg's Suggests.

  But the true fix may be in apt.

  I added a munin bug task as a pointer in case anyone wonder's about
  the autopkgtest regression but I don't believe munin needs any
  changes.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/auto-package-testing/+bug/2054908/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 2054908] Re: gpg-wks-server pulls in postfix

2024-02-25 Thread Jeremy Bícha
** Description changed:

  Example 1
  
  I did a sudo apt dist-upgrade today on my developer machine running Ubuntu 
Desktop 24.04 LTS and it surprisingly pulled in postfix.
  
  I did not built this into a full reproducible test case because I found
  another test case…
  
  Example 2
  
  munin's autopkgtests are now failing because postfix and gpg-wks-server is 
now unexpectedly being installed.
  
  https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/munin/noble/amd64
  
  Other Info
  
  gnupg2's changelog indicates that there was an attempt to avoid this 
misbehavior by having gnupg only Suggest gpg-wks-server. In fact, there is 
**nothing** in Ubuntu that Depends or Recommends gpg-wks-server.
  
- Notably, gnupg has
- Suggests: gpg-wks-server (<< 2.4.4-2ubuntu7.1~), gpg-wks-server (>= 
2.4.4-2ubuntu7)
- 
- I don't recall ever seeing strict versioned Suggests before so it's my
- wild guess that apt does not strict handle versioned Suggests in the
- expected way.
- 
- As a workaround, try dropping the versions from gnupg's Suggests.
- 
- But the true fix may be in apt.
- 
  I added a munin bug task as a pointer in case anyone wonder's about the
  autopkgtest regression but I don't believe munin needs any changes.

** Description changed:

  Example 1
  
  I did a sudo apt dist-upgrade today on my developer machine running Ubuntu 
Desktop 24.04 LTS and it surprisingly pulled in postfix.
  
  I did not built this into a full reproducible test case because I found
  another test case…
  
  Example 2
  
- munin's autopkgtests are now failing because postfix and gpg-wks-server is 
now unexpectedly being installed.
+ munin's autopkgtests are now failing because postfix is now unexpectedly 
being installed.
  
  https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/munin/noble/amd64
  
  Other Info
  
  gnupg2's changelog indicates that there was an attempt to avoid this 
misbehavior by having gnupg only Suggest gpg-wks-server. In fact, there is 
**nothing** in Ubuntu that Depends or Recommends gpg-wks-server.
  
  I added a munin bug task as a pointer in case anyone wonder's about the
  autopkgtest regression but I don't believe munin needs any changes.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2054908

Title:
  gpg-wks-server pulls in postfix

Status in Auto Package Testing:
  New
Status in apt package in Ubuntu:
  Invalid
Status in gnupg2 package in Ubuntu:
  Invalid
Status in munin package in Ubuntu:
  Invalid
Status in ubuntu-release-upgrader package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  Example 1
  
  I did a sudo apt dist-upgrade today on my developer machine running Ubuntu 
Desktop 24.04 LTS and it surprisingly pulled in postfix.

  I did not built this into a full reproducible test case because I
  found another test case…

  Example 2
  
  munin's autopkgtests are now failing because postfix is now unexpectedly 
being installed.

  https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/munin/noble/amd64

  Other Info
  
  gnupg2's changelog indicates that there was an attempt to avoid this 
misbehavior by having gnupg only Suggest gpg-wks-server. In fact, there is 
**nothing** in Ubuntu that Depends or Recommends gpg-wks-server.

  I added a munin bug task as a pointer in case anyone wonder's about
  the autopkgtest regression but I don't believe munin needs any
  changes.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/auto-package-testing/+bug/2054908/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 2054924] Re: color emoji are broken with fontconfig 2.15

2024-02-25 Thread Jeremy Bícha
** Summary changed:

- color emoji is broken with fontconfig 2.15
+ color emoji are broken with fontconfig 2.15

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to fontconfig in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2054924

Title:
  color emoji are broken with fontconfig 2.15

Status in Fontconfig:
  Unknown
Status in fontconfig package in Ubuntu:
  Triaged
Status in fontconfig package in Debian:
  Unknown

Bug description:
  The Noto Color Emoji font is no longer used to show emoji. Many emoji
  no longer show and the few that do are not in color.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/fontconfig/+bug/2054924/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 2054908] Re: gpg-wks-server pulls in postfix

2024-02-25 Thread Jeremy Bícha
** Description changed:

  Example 1
  
  I did a sudo apt dist-upgrade today on my developer machine running Ubuntu 
Desktop 24.04 LTS and it surprisingly pulled in postfix.
  
  I did not built this into a full reproducible test case because I found
  another test case…
  
  Example 2
  
  munin's autopkgtests are now failing because postfix is now unexpectedly 
being installed.
  
  https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/munin/noble/amd64
  
  Other Info
  
- gnupg2's changelog indicates that there was an attempt to avoid this 
misbehavior by having gnupg only Suggest gpg-wks-server. In fact, there is 
**nothing** in Ubuntu that Depends or Recommends gpg-wks-server.
+ gnupg2's changelog indicates that there was an attempt to avoid this 
misbehavior by having gnupg only Suggest gpg-wks-server. In fact, there is 
**nothing** in Ubuntu 24.04 LTS that Depends or Recommends gpg-wks-server.
  
  I added a munin bug task as a pointer in case anyone wonder's about the
  autopkgtest regression but I don't believe munin needs any changes.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2054908

Title:
  gpg-wks-server pulls in postfix

Status in Auto Package Testing:
  New
Status in apt package in Ubuntu:
  Invalid
Status in gnupg2 package in Ubuntu:
  New
Status in munin package in Ubuntu:
  Invalid
Status in ubuntu-release-upgrader package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  Example 1
  
  I did a sudo apt dist-upgrade today on my developer machine running Ubuntu 
Desktop 24.04 LTS and it surprisingly pulled in postfix.

  I did not built this into a full reproducible test case because I
  found another test case…

  Example 2
  
  munin's autopkgtests are now failing because postfix is now unexpectedly 
being installed.

  https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/munin/noble/amd64

  Other Info
  
  gnupg2's changelog indicates that there was an attempt to avoid this 
misbehavior by having gnupg only Suggest gpg-wks-server. In fact, there is 
**nothing** in Ubuntu 24.04 LTS that Depends or Recommends gpg-wks-server.

  I added a munin bug task as a pointer in case anyone wonder's about
  the autopkgtest regression but I don't believe munin needs any
  changes.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/auto-package-testing/+bug/2054908/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 2053207] Re: glib requires gobject-introspection >= 1.78.1-13

2024-02-26 Thread Jeremy Bícha
** Changed in: glib2.0 (Ubuntu)
   Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to gobject-introspection in
Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2053207

Title:
  glib requires gobject-introspection >= 1.78.1-13

Status in glib2.0 package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in gobject-introspection package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released

Bug description:
  glib2.0 2.79.1-1 requires gobject-introspection >= 1.78.13 to migrate
  out of noble-proposed before or at the same as glib2.0.

  I'm filing this bug to explain why glib2.0 isn't migrating despite the
  excuses page saying "Will attempt migration"

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/glib2.0/+bug/2053207/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 2054924] Re: color emoji are broken with fontconfig 2.15

2024-02-27 Thread Jeremy Bícha
** Changed in: fontconfig (Ubuntu)
   Status: Confirmed => Triaged

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to fontconfig in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2054924

Title:
  color emoji are broken with fontconfig 2.15

Status in Fontconfig:
  Fix Released
Status in fontconfig package in Ubuntu:
  Triaged
Status in fonts-noto-color-emoji package in Ubuntu:
  Triaged
Status in fontconfig package in Debian:
  Confirmed

Bug description:
  The Noto Color Emoji font is no longer used to show emoji. Many emoji
  no longer show and the few that do are not in color.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/fontconfig/+bug/2054924/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 2055779] Re: software and updates not opening

2024-03-04 Thread Jeremy Bícha
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 2053228 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2053228

** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 2053228
   software-properties-gtk does not start

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to software-properties in
Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2055779

Title:
  software and updates not opening

Status in software-properties package in Ubuntu:
  Incomplete

Bug description:
  Since recent updates trying to access software sources or additional
  drivers gets no response.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/software-properties/+bug/2055779/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 2052851] Re: add-apt-repository Cannot Manage deb822 Repository Sources

2024-04-06 Thread Jeremy Bícha
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 2033949 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2033949

I marked this as a duplicate because Ubuntu 24.04 LTS does handle PPAs
now. I recommend trying Ubuntu 24.04 LTS Beta when it is released soon.

Could you open a separate issue for add-apt-repository --list not
returning any deb822 repositories?

** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 2033949
   Does not work with Ubuntu sources in deb822 format

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to software-properties in
Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2052851

Title:
  add-apt-repository Cannot Manage deb822 Repository Sources

Status in software-properties package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  On Ubuntu 23.10...

  * When adding a PPA, 'add-apt-repository' will add the repository in
  the new deb822 format as a '.sources' file in
  '/etc/apt/sources.list.d'

  * However, 'add-apt-repository --list' cannot see/understand the new
  '.sources' file

  For example, with the flacon ppa
  (https://launchpad.net/~flacon/+archive/ubuntu/ppa):

  1. 'sudo add-apt-repository ppa:flacon/ppa' adds the flacon repo as
  '/etc/apt/sources.list.d/flacon-ubuntu-ppa-mantic.sources'

  2. apt can install and update from the new repo, as expected. you can
  also remove the repo, as expected, by running 'sudo add-apt-repository
  --remove ppa:flacon/ppa'

  3. However, 'add-apt-repository --list' does not list the repo as it
  should. GUI package managers such as Muon and Synaptic also do not see
  the new repo.

  It makes working with packages quite frustrating, and unfortunately,
  per Julian Andres Klode (juliank), there seems to be no plan to fix
  the broken 'software-properties-common' any time soon. See here:

  https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/software-
  properties/+bug/2033949

  Also see related issues:

  https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ppa-purge/+bug/2036761
  https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/software-properties/+bug/2037210
  https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+bug/2036288
  https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-devel/2023-September/042791.html

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/software-properties/+bug/2052851/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


<    1   2   3