RE: [Trac] Trac evaluation
On 2011-07-13 at 17:23:36, W. Martin Borgert wrote: ... 2. Many of the listed times were relative (2 hours ago, etc.). Yes, this is annoying. I believe, there was a plugin or sth. changing the timeline etc. to normal ISO-8601 time stamps, but I can't find it just now. I don't mind the relative dates but it'd be nice if you could hover your mouse over them and get the absolute date. To me that'd be the best of both worlds. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Trac Users group. To post to this group, send email to trac-users@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to trac-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/trac-users?hl=en.
RE: [Trac] Trac evaluation
On Thu, 2011-07-14 at 07:40 -0400, Chris Nelson wrote: On 2011-07-13 at 17:23:36, W. Martin Borgert wrote: ... 2. Many of the listed times were relative (2 hours ago, etc.). Yes, this is annoying. I believe, there was a plugin or sth. changing the timeline etc. to normal ISO-8601 time stamps, but I can't find it just now. I don't mind the relative dates but it'd be nice if you could hover your mouse over them and get the absolute date. To me that'd be the best of both worlds. I get that behavior in 0.12. For example in comments added to tickets. Or in the Last Modified at the top of a wiki page. -- Roger Oberholtzer -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Trac Users group. To post to this group, send email to trac-users@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to trac-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/trac-users?hl=en.
RE: [Trac] Trac evaluation
Quoting Roger Oberholtzer roger.oberholt...@gmail.com: On Thu, 2011-07-14 at 07:40 -0400, Chris Nelson wrote: I don't mind the relative dates but it'd be nice if you could hover your mouse over them and get the absolute date. To me that'd be the best of both worlds. I get that behavior in 0.12. For example in comments added to tickets. Or in the Last Modified at the top of a wiki page. I get this behaviour even in 0.11.7-4 on Debian. Not having to hover would be nice, however. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Trac Users group. To post to this group, send email to trac-users@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to trac-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/trac-users?hl=en.
[Trac] Trac evaluation
I am starting to evaluate Trac for product and documentation development, including software, firmware, electronic, and mechanical design. I have used Bugzilla in the past. When I went to the demo website, I noticed a couple of differences 1. The displayed form confuses priority (do first, do second, etc.) with severity (self destructs, nice to have, etc.). 2. Many of the listed times were relative (2 hours ago, etc.). How easy is it to configure to use a severity label for the appropriate field and to change time stamps to absolute? Thad Smith 303-443-6699 Linx Technologies 5345 Arapahoe Ave, #5 Boulder, CO 80301 -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Trac Users group. To post to this group, send email to trac-users@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to trac-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/trac-users?hl=en.
Re: [Trac] Trac evaluation
On 07/13/2011 11:39 AM, Thad Smith wrote: How easy is it to configure to use a severity label for the appropriate field Easy. This is configurable via the web ui, or the .ini file. and to change time stamps to absolute? More difficult. It will require hacking on core trac or writing a plugin. One may exist already, but if so, I'm not aware of it. -- Matthew Caron Build Engineer Sixnet | www.sixnet.com O +1 518 877 5173 Ext. 138 F +1 518 602 9209 matt.ca...@sixnet.com -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Trac Users group. To post to this group, send email to trac-users@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to trac-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/trac-users?hl=en.
Re: [Trac] Trac evaluation
and to change time stamps to absolute? More difficult. It will require hacking on core trac or writing a plugin. One may exist already, but if so, I'm not aware of it. That is supposed to be contained in the 0.13dev development tree, as a user configurable item. See http://trac.edgewall.org/ticket/9777 regards Patrick -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Trac Users group. To post to this group, send email to trac-users@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to trac-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/trac-users?hl=en.
Re: [Trac] Trac evaluation
On 2011-07-13 15:39, Thad Smith wrote: 1. The displayed form confuses priority (do first, do second, etc.) with severity (self destructs, nice to have, etc.). You can define them as you like. 2. Many of the listed times were relative (2 hours ago, etc.). Yes, this is annoying. I believe, there was a plugin or sth. changing the timeline etc. to normal ISO-8601 time stamps, but I can't find it just now. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Trac Users group. To post to this group, send email to trac-users@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to trac-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/trac-users?hl=en.
