Re: [Trisquel-users] Off-topic: The end of Freedom in GitHub
No free/libre license forces the author to grant everyone access to the free/libre software, and GNU GPL is no exception.
Re: [Trisquel-users] Off-topic: The end of Freedom in GitHub
I don't violate Freedom 0 if I deny someone to access a free/libre software.
Re: [Trisquel-users] Off-topic: The end of Freedom in GitHub
https://notabug.org/hp/gogs/issues/236 I think it would be a better option using https://framagit.org
Re: [Trisquel-users] Off-topic: The end of Freedom in GitHub
"can also explicitly prohibit anyone from using it without violating GNU GPL" A point of order: Publishing a program under the GPLv3 and including that would probably be a "further restriction" within the meaning of section 10 of GPLv3. This seems similar to what happens when programs are released under the GPLv3 but say they're only for "non-commercial use" or "personal use only" or some such thing. The GPL's answer to these types of situations is: "If the Program as you received it, or any part of it, contains a notice stating that it is governed by this License along with a term that is a further restriction, you may remove that term..." :)
Re: [Trisquel-users] Off-topic: The end of Freedom in GitHub
On 30/07/19 07:22, wrote: > It's not good to censor the developers in "Enemies of United States". > But this is not relevant to freedom. "Accessibility" is not an > inherent requirement of freedom. (See "Four Essential Freedoms", there > is no "accessibility".) Access != Accessibility If you bothered to start reading the Four Freedoms, right at the start you would find the First Freedom, Freedom 0, "The ability to run the program for any purpose". There. -- Ignacio Agulló · grafot...@grafotema.com
Re: [Trisquel-users] Off-topic: The end of Freedom in GitHub
this! publickey - davidpgil@protonmail.com - 0x01EB3346.asc Description: application/pgp-keys signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: [Trisquel-users] Off-topic: The end of Freedom in GitHub
I understand that article talks about denying use of services, and about using currently hosted projects to exclude some people participation. https://github.com/1995parham/github-do-not-ban-us Important projects are still hosted in Github.com and are affected by this political exclusion: https://github.com/ytdl-org/youtube-dl https://github.com/torvalds/linux https://github.com/sasanrose/phpredmin https://github.com/mostafa/iptables_book https://github.com/keyvank/tracy And important ones because help to extend Trisquel project: https://github.com/scollazo/docker-brew-trisquel-debootstrap https://github.com/VanackSabbadium/TrisquelStuff https://github.com/proninyaroslav/abrowser-android https://github.com/proninyaroslav/abrowser-rpm https://github.com/frnmst/trisquel-installation-script El 30/7/19 a les 11:29, xliang9...@live.cn ha escrit: > Every "user" who have one copy of free/libre software can exercise his > re-distribution freedom (Freedom 2 and 3) to share it with "non-user". > So, total censorship is technically impossible. > > And this is why companies and governments want to make sharing illegal.
[Trisquel-users] Re : Computer will not shut down
It looks all normal: the target "Shutdown" is reached. The problem must be in the kernel. https://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/323383/linux-mint-18-hangs-at-shutdown suggests adding options (apm=power_off, acpi=force, etc.) to it (in the GRUB_CMDLINE_LINUX_DEFAULT variable of /etc/default/grub, unless you do not use the default bootloader) or disabling things in the BIOS (USB 3.0 legacy mode, EuP-setting, etc.). I would first try a newer kernel. Installing the package "linux-image-generic-hwe-8.0" (in Trisquel's repository) will give you version 4.15. https://jxself.org/linux-libre/ seems down at the moment. When back online, it will provide instructions to get an even newer kernel. After installing the kernel you need to reboot (on the newer kernel) and try to shutdown to see if the newer kernel does not suffer from the same problem.
Re: [Trisquel-users] Off-topic: The end of Freedom in GitHub
Every "user" who have one copy of free/libre software can exercise his re-distribution freedom (Freedom 2 and 3) to share it with "non-user". So, total censorship is technically impossible. And this is why companies and governments want to make sharing illegal.
Re: [Trisquel-users] Off-topic: The end of Freedom in GitHub
Sure, you are free (for example) to select your project members by race, and anti-racist people are free to migrate to another platform. Let's fitght to keep freedom on platform selection. gitlab.org is another example for self-hosting and/or self-management. El 30/7/19 a les 7:22, xliang9...@live.cn ha escrit: > It's not good to censor the developers in "Enemies of United States". > But this is not relevant to freedom. "Accessibility" is not an inherent > requirement of freedom. (See "Four Essential Freedoms", there is no > "accessibility".) > > To be more specific, I can publish a GNU GPL v3-or-Later licensed > free/libre software, but I can also explicitly prohibit anyone from > using it without violating GNU GPL. I don't violate a free/libre license > as long as I grant the "user subset" four essential freedoms. Anyone not > belonging to the "user subset" cannot force me to share the source code > to him. I don't need to care the freedom of "non-user" of the free/libre > software. > > To be very extreme, I can write a free/libre software and NOT to share > it with anyone. In other words, anyone else don't even know the > existence of the free/libre software. Then this is called a "trivial > free/libre software". Though it does no good, it does no bad (as > proprietary software does) either.
