Re: [Trisquel-users] I'm leaving Trisquel

[jah]

This is a useful tip! Thank you.

Re: [Trisquel-users] Kernel Source package signature signed with unknown key 0x92D284CF33C66596

[jah]

Thanks @jxself, good explanation.

Is there a standard procedure for reporting the fact that the package  
downloaded by `apt-get source linux` (linux_3.13.0-77.121+7.0trisquel2) is  
signed with a key (0x92D284CF33C66596) for which no public cert appears to be  
available?

[Trisquel-users] Kernel Source package signature signed with unknown key 0x92D284CF33C66596

[jah]

Two things I don't understand:-

1) Why does apt-get source fetch a different source package to the one named  
in the arg?

2) Why can't key 0x92D284CF33C66596 be found?

$ apt-get source linux-image-3.13.0-76-generic
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
Picking 'linux' as source package instead of 'linux-image-3.13.0-76-generic'
...
Need to get 124 MB of source archives.
Get:1 http://es.archive.trisquel.info/trisquel/ belenos-updates/main linux  
3.13.0-77.121+7.0trisquel2 (dsc) [7,481 B]
Get:2 http://es.archive.trisquel.info/trisquel/ belenos-updates/main linux  
3.13.0-77.121+7.0trisquel2 (tar) [124 MB]

Fetched 124 MB in 2min 3s (1,008 kB/s)
gpgv: Signature made Tue 02 Feb 2016 00:43:48 GMT using RSA key ID 33C66596
gpgv: Can't check signature: public key not found
dpkg-source: warning: failed to verify signature on  
./linux_3.13.0-77.121+7.0trisquel2.dsc

dpkg-source: info: extracting linux in linux-3.13.0
dpkg-source: info: unpacking linux_3.13.0-77.121+7.0trisquel2.tar.gz

$ gpg2 --verify linux_3.13.0-77.121+7.0trisquel2.dsc
gpg: Signature made Tue 02 Feb 2016 00:43:48 GMT
gpg:using RSA key 0x92D284CF33C66596
gpg: Can't check signature: No public key

$ torsocks gpg2 --keyserver jirk5u4osbsr34t5.onion --recv-keys  
0x92D284CF33C66596

gpg: requesting key 0x92D284CF33C66596 from hkp server jirk5u4osbsr34t5.onion
gpgkeys: key 92D284CF33C66596 not found on keyserver
gpg: no valid OpenPGP data found.
gpg: Total number processed: 0

Re: [Trisquel-users] Can I make install over a package that can't be removed due to dependencies

[jah]

Vielen Dank vinzn. I looked in the automade Makefile and found that the Nmap  
developers had already considered this possibility: prefix was configured as  
/usr/local .


The packaged nmap is installed in /usr/bin/nmap and so it was necessary only  
to `make install` and the SVN Nmap was installed to /usr/local/bin/nmap


Thanks again for your help.

[Trisquel-users] Can I make install over a package that can't be removed due to dependencies

[jah]

I want to `make install nmap` from its subversion repository, but aptitude  
wants to fix broken packages by removing gnome-nettool, trisquel and  
trisquel-base-recommended if I try to `aptitude uninstall nmap`.


Can I just make install without removing the nmap package or is there some  
way to inform aptitude of my intention?