Re: [Trisquel-users] Vulnerable router Trisquel ineffective LibreCMC hope

[zatroch]

Thanks for pointing out the rational info. I freaked out there and became  
paranoid for a day or two. Topic can be deleted or locked.

Re: [Trisquel-users] Vulnerable router Trisquel ineffective LibreCMC hope

[jason]

It might be more helpful if you could provide specific technical details,  
rather than spouting off stuff.


Also, LibreBoot targets X86 systems primarily so don't count on it showing up  
in these routers, which are usually ARM or MIPS. These embedded systems  
usually use Das U-Boot instead: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Das_U-Boot

Re: [Trisquel-users] Vulnerable router Trisquel ineffective LibreCMC hope

[zatroch]

*** URL got screwed  put your 

Re: [Trisquel-users] Vulnerable router Trisquel ineffective LibreCMC hope

[em9002]

What do you mean by GNU/Linux is rendered ineffective?

Re: [Trisquel-users] Vulnerable router Trisquel ineffective LibreCMC hope

[zatroch]

That it's near-to identical with having Win0-day$ as a main OS, behind  
firewalled router. Yay. =S On the other note..


magnet:?xt=urn:btih:7aa9964690d3867c0296c2ca83198f6b5b0a7264dn=Glenn+Greenwald+-+No+Place+to+Hide+%28epub%2C+mobi%29tr=udp%3A%2F%2Ftracker.openbittorrent.com%3A80tr=udp%3A%2F%2Ftracker.publicbt.com%3A80tr=udp%3A%2F%2Ftracker.istole.it%3A6969tr=udp%3A%2F%2Fopen.demonii.com%3A1337