[Trisquel-users] malware

2013-12-15 Thread chris . arijs

Hi all,
Is there any possibility to check of the trisquel-os on a desktop is infected  
with a virus, or malware, or other stuff.
On Win-d ows there are plenty of Antivirus programs and mostly you can see  
that the system is infected.

Are there indications for infections of Gnu/linux trisquel ?

PS this is just a hypothetical question; My trisqueldistribution is not  
infected ( i think ! )


Re: [Trisquel-users] malware

2013-12-15 Thread Sachin D
clamav, rkhunter, lynis are some of the tools available on trisquel


Re: [Trisquel-users] malware

2013-12-15 Thread dadix

It's clamav  from http:/www.clamav.net.

It's in trisquel repo. Look for Clamtk in Trisquel programs, which is a  
interface for clamav, because clamav is a command line antivirus.


Re: [Trisquel-users] malware

2013-12-15 Thread george . standish
@spinoza, if you limit yourself to installing things from the default repo -  
malware is NOT something you have to worry about.


Re: [Trisquel-users] malware

2013-12-15 Thread onpon4
Actually, there are no such programs for detecting GNU/Linux viruses and  
other malware. ClamAV detects Windows viruses so that you don't infect  
Windows systems. Viruses for GNU/Linux systems are a curiosity at best right  
now, because on most GNU systems the only files they could possibly infect  
without you typing your password are those in your home directory.


As mentioned, you're going to be fine if you stick to the repos. If you  
don't, you can prevent theoretical serious problems by just not giving any  
programs downloaded from somewhere outside the repo root privileges unless  
you've checked or had someone else check the source code. The worst that  
could happen is your home directory being messed up.


But this is just theoretical right now. Nobody bothers writing malware for  
GNU/Linux systems; it isn't worth the effort. You're far more likely to lose  
your files to a hard drive failure than you are to lose your files to a  
trojan horse or virus. Just keep your system up-to-date and you'll be fine.


Re: [Trisquel-users] malware

2013-12-15 Thread dudeski
Oh avoiding malware is easy, no need for any AV stuff.. Just follow the three  
step mantra.
Don't own a computer, don't turn it on, and whatever you do, don't connect it  
to the internet. 


Re: [Trisquel-users] malware

2013-12-15 Thread shiretoko
(...)because on most GNU systems the only files they could possibly infect  
without you typing your password are those in your home directory.


Well, those are the most important files for the user, aren't they?



Re: [Trisquel-users] malware

2013-12-15 Thread onpon4

That's what backups are for.

The threat of some malicious program is hugely lower than the threat of your  
hard drive failing, and it's very easy to fix if you have backups: just  
delete your home folder. Problem solved. With a hard drive failure, you have  
to buy a new hard drive and install the OS on it all over again.


And like I said, it's all theoretical right now anyway. Nobody bothers  
writing malware for GNU/Linux systems because of a combination of the  
difficulty of making it effective and GNU/Linux systems not being all that  
popular on PCs.


Re: [Trisquel-users] malware

2013-12-15 Thread gramex

http://trisquel.info/en/forum/careful-ppa

Is this just FUD?


Re: [Trisquel-users] malware

2013-12-15 Thread onpon4
No, not at all. It's absolutely true that you should be careful with external  
repositories. But there's no need for antivirus software, and there's no  
reason to be worried by the fact that there is no antivirus software.


Re: [Trisquel-users] malware

2013-12-15 Thread Andresmp

first define malware https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Malware

next, from my point of view, if you take a ppa or a *.deb package that helps  
you install propietary software such as skype on your trisquel machine it  
means you have malware.


an antivirus is for virii not all malware. 


Re: [Trisquel-users] malware

2013-12-15 Thread george . standish
@andresm while I agree with your definition of malware (ie. including all  
propritary software).  i think the origional poster is probably using malware  
in the commonly used definition, to include all virus/spyware/etc...