[TruthTalk] Fw: and now
- Original Message - From: Debbie Sawczak To: 'Lance Muir' Sent: March 19, 2006 15:56 Subject: and now sectarianism. Is nobody safe from your ignorance andbigotry? DM has never really understood what an ad hominem is. It has nothing to do with rudeness. All ad homs, as a form of logical fallacy,are a variant of "Your disagreeing with me is just an intellectual failure on your part. Hence I am right." The rude parts are just incidental extensions of the first sentence, of the form "...resulting from your being Catholic, Calvinist, prejudiced, poorly-read, Canadian, Communist, stupid, deceived by the devil, blind, itchy-eared, liberal, [fill in the blank]." D --No virus found in this outgoing message.Checked by AVG Free Edition.Version: 7.1.385 / Virus Database: 268.2.5/284 - Release Date: 3/17/2006
Re: [TruthTalk] Fw: and now
Strange friend you have Lance; she has her own definitions for everything. If something false that sounds logical is the criteria then we should begin to censure everyone who speaks the truth, it sure would be a lot less work for the moderator. 1984 has arrived. On Mon, 20 Mar 2006 07:43:52 -0500 "Lance Muir" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: From: Debbie Sawczak sectarianism. Is nobody safe from your ignorance andbigotry? DM has never really understood what an ad hominem is. It has nothing to do with rudeness. All ad homs, as a form of logical fallacy,are a variant of "Your disagreeing with me is just an intellectual failure on your part. Hence I am right." The rude parts are just incidental extensions of the first sentence, of the form "... resulting from your being Catholic, Calvinist, prejudiced, poorly-read, Canadian, Communist, stupid, deceived by the devil, blind, itchy-eared, liberal, [fill in the blank]." D
Re: [TruthTalk] Fw: and now
I'm curious, Judy. Have you read 1984 by George Orwell? - Original Message - From: Judy Taylor To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org Sent: March 20, 2006 08:30 Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Fw: and now Strange friend you have Lance; she has her own definitions for everything. If something false that sounds logical is the criteria then we should begin to censure everyone who speaks the truth, it sure would be a lot less work for the moderator. 1984 has arrived. On Mon, 20 Mar 2006 07:43:52 -0500 "Lance Muir" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: From: Debbie Sawczak sectarianism. Is nobody safe from your ignorance andbigotry? DM has never really understood what an ad hominem is. It has nothing to do with rudeness. All ad homs, as a form of logical fallacy,are a variant of "Your disagreeing with me is just an intellectual failure on your part. Hence I am right." The rude parts are just incidental extensions of the first sentence, of the form "... resulting from your being Catholic, Calvinist, prejudiced, poorly-read, Canadian, Communist, stupid, deceived by the devil, blind, itchy-eared, liberal, [fill in the blank]." D
