Re: [DAS] Status of DAS Release

[Adriano Crestani]

I went through all das samples and they seem to be working fine on Windows
XP Home Edition SP 2 environment. I also corrected some links on readmes
that were pointing to old tuscany website.

I ran the rat on java/das directory and added Apache Licence header to files
that were missing it.

Regards,
Adriano Crestani

On 6/8/07, Luciano Resende [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


First of all, let me thank you all for helping on this release.
Recently there has been a lot of progress, and things are looking good
from the list of issues we had listed in the wiki [1]. The remaining
documentation tasks could probably go in parallel with the release
candidates. So, we should start thinking about creating a branch for
the next release sometime soon, probably over the weekend or Monday
and then start publishing release candidates from that.

Also, I think we should look into the following items before we create
the first RC :

   - run rat and make the results available
   - review the contents of license, readme, release_notes, changes, etc
   - review javadoc
   - make sure samples readme are updated and correct and the samples
are working ok on different environments

I'd also like to suggest two other things :
   - Name the release beta1, to be aligned with the beta1 release of SDO.
   - Any blocking issue to be tracked as blocking JIRA and directly
assigned to beta1 release.

Does this sound ok to everyone?  Any Thoughts ?


[1]
http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/TUSCANY/RDB+DAS+-+Java+DAS+Beta1+Release


--
Luciano Resende
Apache Tuscany Committer
http://people.apache.org/~lresende
http://lresende.blogspot.com/

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Lazy loading and resolution of SCA composites, was: An observation about the current Contribution handling code

[Simon Laws]

Sebastien, it looks like a good start on the lazy loading to me.

On the disitributed runtime scenario point. I'd like to start putting the
distributed runtime bits I have so far into head so I would like to work
with you in making a start on the notion of a domain/runtime configured
through incremental changes. This could, in future, facilitate an event
driven runtime management function for the operations you mention. I think
the first thing we could do is build an extension of the domain
implementation which supports the notion of the domain composite deployed
into the local runtime and make the exercise of building the domain
composite an exercise in adding those artifacts for which the runtime is
responsible. At the moment what I have is the domain composite being created
after which the bits that the runtime is not responsible for are chopped
out.

Simon

[LDAP DAS] Quick Update

[Ole Ersoy]

Hey Guys,

I thought and really wanted to have the reading of writing of DataGraph 
instances wrapped up today, but I hit a bug in ApacheDS that's a 
blocker, so it will be a little while longer.  Hope to have it done very 
soon though.


Cheers,
- Ole

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]