Re: Verification Testing
Hi Kevin, I would like to contribute to this effort. Thanks! Kevin Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] 03/19/2008 01:40 PM Please respond to tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org To tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org cc [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject Verification Testing I am thinking of adding a new test bucket specifically for verification testing against the specification set. I believe it would add value to the project and may also be a place where developers new to Tuscany might contribute. Does this sound like a reasonable idea? Thanks, --Kevin - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Verification Testing
I've some test cases for ComponentContext that I would like to contribute. Can someone please help me out with them? Thank you. Yee-Kang Chang/Toronto/[EMAIL PROTECTED] 04/03/2008 12:01 PM Please respond to tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org To tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org cc Subject Re: Verification Testing Hi Kevin, I would like to contribute to this effort. Thanks! Kevin Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] 03/19/2008 01:40 PM Please respond to tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org To tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org cc [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject Verification Testing I am thinking of adding a new test bucket specifically for verification testing against the specification set. I believe it would add value to the project and may also be a place where developers new to Tuscany might contribute. Does this sound like a reasonable idea? Thanks, --Kevin
Re: Verification Testing
Hi Yee-Kang, I just created TUSCANY-2195 to accept and track testing for ComponentContext. You can attach your contribution there. Thanks, --Kevin On Thu, Apr 3, 2008 at 3:55 PM, Yee-Kang Chang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've some test cases for ComponentContext that I would like to contribute. Can someone please help me out with them? Thank you. Yee-Kang Chang/Toronto/[EMAIL PROTECTED] 04/03/2008 12:01 PM Please respond to tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org To tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org cc Subject Re: Verification Testing Hi Kevin, I would like to contribute to this effort. Thanks! Kevin Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] 03/19/2008 01:40 PM Please respond to tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org To tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org cc [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject Verification Testing I am thinking of adding a new test bucket specifically for verification testing against the specification set. I believe it would add value to the project and may also be a place where developers new to Tuscany might contribute. Does this sound like a reasonable idea? Thanks, --Kevin - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Verification Testing
Kevin Williams wrote: I think that named annotations would be more clear since there is not a direct mapping from line number to compliance point. A compliance point may cover n lines or a single line may have n compliance points. In that case you could produce a separate compliance document that maps between compliance points and spec line numbers in a one-many or many-one fashion as necessary. Simon On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 9:47 AM, Simon Nash [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Kevin Williams wrote: I'd like to add an annotated version of the SCA Java Common Annotations and APIs specification somewhere in the project so that I can reference individual functional requirements from the tests. Does it make sense to add this as an attachment to the Java SCA Documentation wiki page? If the references are from the tests to the spec, it should be possible to use spec line numbers and not modify the spec. Is there some problem with this? Simon Thanks, --Kevin On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 11:22 AM, Kevin Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I would like to tie individual tests in this new suite to specific functional requirements from the specifications. The best way to do this may be to reference named requirements from annotated versions of the specs. Would it make sense to store these annotated versions somewhere in the project? Thanks, --Kevin On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 3:21 AM, Vamsavardhana Reddy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: +1 ++Vamsi On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 11:10 PM, Kevin Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I am thinking of adding a new test bucket specifically for verification testing against the specification set. I believe it would add value to the project and may also be a place where developers new to Tuscany might contribute. Does this sound like a reasonable idea? Thanks, --Kevin - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Verification Testing
I'd say that publishing a modified (in this case annotated) version of the specification might have licensing issues. Also, as there is no compliance test or a clear compliance definition on the spec, your annotations around this area might be controversial. On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 9:12 AM, Kevin Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I think that named annotations would be more clear since there is not a direct mapping from line number to compliance point. A compliance point may cover n lines or a single line may have n compliance points. On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 9:47 AM, Simon Nash [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Kevin Williams wrote: I'd like to add an annotated version of the SCA Java Common Annotations and APIs specification somewhere in the project so that I can reference individual functional requirements from the tests. Does it make sense to add this as an attachment to the Java SCA Documentation wiki page? If the references are from the tests to the spec, it should be possible to use spec line numbers and not modify the spec. Is there some problem with this? Simon Thanks, --Kevin On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 11:22 AM, Kevin Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I would like to tie individual tests in this new suite to specific functional requirements from the specifications. The best way to do this may be to reference named requirements from annotated versions of the specs. Would it make sense to store these annotated versions somewhere in the project? Thanks, --Kevin On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 3:21 AM, Vamsavardhana Reddy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: +1 ++Vamsi On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 11:10 PM, Kevin Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I am thinking of adding a new test bucket specifically for verification testing against the specification set. I believe it would add value to the project and may also be a place where developers new to Tuscany might contribute. Does this sound like a reasonable idea? Thanks, --Kevin - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Luciano Resende Apache Tuscany Committer http://people.apache.org/~lresende http://lresende.blogspot.com/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Verification Testing
These are good points. I'll think about making line numbers work. Thanks. - Kevin On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 10:52 AM, Luciano Resende [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'd say that publishing a modified (in this case annotated) version of the specification might have licensing issues. Also, as there is no compliance test or a clear compliance definition on the spec, your annotations around this area might be controversial. On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 9:12 AM, Kevin Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I think that named annotations would be more clear since there is not a direct mapping from line number to compliance point. A compliance point may cover n lines or a single line may have n compliance points. On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 9:47 AM, Simon Nash [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Kevin Williams wrote: I'd like to add an annotated version of the SCA Java Common Annotations and APIs specification somewhere in the project so that I can reference individual functional requirements from the tests. Does it make sense to add this as an attachment to the Java SCA Documentation wiki page? If the references are from the tests to the spec, it should be possible to use spec line numbers and not modify the spec. Is there some problem with this? Simon Thanks, --Kevin On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 11:22 AM, Kevin Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I would like to tie individual tests in this new suite to specific functional requirements from the specifications. The best way to do this may be to reference named requirements from annotated versions of the specs. Would it make sense to store these annotated versions somewhere in the project? Thanks, --Kevin On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 3:21 AM, Vamsavardhana Reddy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: +1 ++Vamsi On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 11:10 PM, Kevin Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I am thinking of adding a new test bucket specifically for verification testing against the specification set. I believe it would add value to the project and may also be a place where developers new to Tuscany might contribute. Does this sound like a reasonable idea? Thanks, --Kevin - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Luciano Resende Apache Tuscany Committer http://people.apache.org/~lresende http://lresende.blogspot.com/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Verification Testing
I'd like to add an annotated version of the SCA Java Common Annotations and APIs specification somewhere in the project so that I can reference individual functional requirements from the tests. Does it make sense to add this as an attachment to the Java SCA Documentation wiki page? Thanks, --Kevin On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 11:22 AM, Kevin Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I would like to tie individual tests in this new suite to specific functional requirements from the specifications. The best way to do this may be to reference named requirements from annotated versions of the specs. Would it make sense to store these annotated versions somewhere in the project? Thanks, --Kevin On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 3:21 AM, Vamsavardhana Reddy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: +1 ++Vamsi On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 11:10 PM, Kevin Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I am thinking of adding a new test bucket specifically for verification testing against the specification set. I believe it would add value to the project and may also be a place where developers new to Tuscany might contribute. Does this sound like a reasonable idea? Thanks, --Kevin - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Verification Testing
On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 8:26 PM, Dan Becker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Simon Nash wrote: Kevin Williams wrote: I am thinking of adding a new test bucket specifically for verification testing against the specification set. I believe it would add value to the project and may also be a place where developers new to Tuscany might contribute. Does this sound like a reasonable idea? +1 I think it is very useful and will be a good way to make piece-of-mind regression tests. -- Thanks, Dan Becker - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] +1 excellent idea Simon
Re: Verification Testing
+1 ++Vamsi On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 11:10 PM, Kevin Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I am thinking of adding a new test bucket specifically for verification testing against the specification set. I believe it would add value to the project and may also be a place where developers new to Tuscany might contribute. Does this sound like a reasonable idea? Thanks, --Kevin - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Verification Testing
I would like to tie individual tests in this new suite to specific functional requirements from the specifications. The best way to do this may be to reference named requirements from annotated versions of the specs. Would it make sense to store these annotated versions somewhere in the project? Thanks, --Kevin On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 3:21 AM, Vamsavardhana Reddy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: +1 ++Vamsi On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 11:10 PM, Kevin Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I am thinking of adding a new test bucket specifically for verification testing against the specification set. I believe it would add value to the project and may also be a place where developers new to Tuscany might contribute. Does this sound like a reasonable idea? Thanks, --Kevin - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Verification Testing
Kevin Williams wrote: I am thinking of adding a new test bucket specifically for verification testing against the specification set. I believe it would add value to the project and may also be a place where developers new to Tuscany might contribute. Does this sound like a reasonable idea? Thanks, --Kevin - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] +1. We have seen some JIRAs raised by users that indicate we still have a few holes here, so this would be very useful. Simon - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Verification Testing
Simon Nash wrote: Kevin Williams wrote: I am thinking of adding a new test bucket specifically for verification testing against the specification set. I believe it would add value to the project and may also be a place where developers new to Tuscany might contribute. Does this sound like a reasonable idea? +1 I think it is very useful and will be a good way to make piece-of-mind regression tests. -- Thanks, Dan Becker - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
