Re: XSDDocumentProcessor visibility

2007-07-23 Thread Luciano Resende

Can multiple DocumentProcess register to the same doc type?


At the moment, we are just executing one "Processor" per document type.

On 7/23/07, Huang Kai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

+1. Maybe there's more modules intrested in the xsd. SDO's types are also 
defined in xsd files.
Can multiple DocumentProcess register to the same doc type?
- Original Message -
From: "Venkata Krishnan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: 
Sent: Monday, July 23, 2007 1:38 AM
Subject: Re: XSDDocumentProcessor visibility


> +1.  since I imagine xsd documents is not something that is only used
> with wsdls.
>
> - Venkat
>
> On 7/22/07, Luciano Resende <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Looks like XSDDocumentProcessor is not being registered with the
>> proper artifact extension point, and it's being only available
>> internally to the WSDLDocumentProcessor. Should we register it with
>> the extension point to make it more widely available ?
>>
>> --
>> Luciano Resende
>> Apache Tuscany Committer
>> http://people.apache.org/~lresende
>> http://lresende.blogspot.com/
>>
>> -
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>



--
Luciano Resende
Apache Tuscany Committer
http://people.apache.org/~lresende
http://lresende.blogspot.com/

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: XSDDocumentProcessor visibility

2007-07-23 Thread Mike Edwards

Luciano,

Yes, make it more widely available.

Yours,  Mike.

Luciano Resende wrote:

Looks like XSDDocumentProcessor is not being registered with the
proper artifact extension point, and it's being only available
internally to the WSDLDocumentProcessor. Should we register it with
the extension point to make it more widely available ?



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: XSDDocumentProcessor visibility

2007-07-23 Thread Huang Kai
+1. Maybe there's more modules intrested in the xsd. SDO's types are also 
defined in xsd files.
Can multiple DocumentProcess register to the same doc type?
- Original Message - 
From: "Venkata Krishnan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: 
Sent: Monday, July 23, 2007 1:38 AM
Subject: Re: XSDDocumentProcessor visibility


> +1.  since I imagine xsd documents is not something that is only used
> with wsdls.
> 
> - Venkat
> 
> On 7/22/07, Luciano Resende <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Looks like XSDDocumentProcessor is not being registered with the
>> proper artifact extension point, and it's being only available
>> internally to the WSDLDocumentProcessor. Should we register it with
>> the extension point to make it more widely available ?
>>
>> --
>> Luciano Resende
>> Apache Tuscany Committer
>> http://people.apache.org/~lresende
>> http://lresende.blogspot.com/
>>
>> -
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>>
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>

Re: XSDDocumentProcessor visibility

2007-07-22 Thread Venkata Krishnan

+1.  since I imagine xsd documents is not something that is only used
with wsdls.

- Venkat

On 7/22/07, Luciano Resende <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Looks like XSDDocumentProcessor is not being registered with the
proper artifact extension point, and it's being only available
internally to the WSDLDocumentProcessor. Should we register it with
the extension point to make it more widely available ?

--
Luciano Resende
Apache Tuscany Committer
http://people.apache.org/~lresende
http://lresende.blogspot.com/

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



XSDDocumentProcessor visibility

2007-07-22 Thread Luciano Resende

Looks like XSDDocumentProcessor is not being registered with the
proper artifact extension point, and it's being only available
internally to the WSDLDocumentProcessor. Should we register it with
the extension point to make it more widely available ?

--
Luciano Resende
Apache Tuscany Committer
http://people.apache.org/~lresende
http://lresende.blogspot.com/

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]