Re: [twitter-dev] Really, You're not going to suspend @julianperretta?
On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 10:18 AM, John Meyer wrote: > On 4/28/2010 7:50 AM, TJ Luoma wrote: >> >> He's been plagiarizing people for weeks, and has been reported for >> spam by dozens of people that I know about. > > Spam I understand, but are you actually trying to report plagarism on a > bloody tweet? Are you kidding me? We're you planning on selling that bit > of wisdom somewhere? Spinning it off for a book deal? http://help.twitter.com/forums/26257/entries/18311 under "spam" "If you repeatedly post other users' Tweets as your own" But Twitter ought to just enforce the rules *you* care about. TjL
Re: [twitter-dev] Really, You're not going to suspend @julianperretta?
On 4/28/2010 8:28 AM, Andrew Badera wrote: John L Meyer: Twitter Women's Auxiliary Air Force, in effect! ∞ Andy Badera ∞ +1 518-641-1280 Google Voice ∞ This email is: [ ] bloggable [x] ask first [ ] private ∞ Google me:http://www.google.com/search?q=andrew%20badera Is that some sort of cut down? Cause all I see is a sad pathetic immature crackback.
Re: [twitter-dev] Really, You're not going to suspend @julianperretta?
What do you care why or why not someone is concerned with plagiarism? John L Meyer: Twitter Women's Auxiliary Air Force, in effect! ∞ Andy Badera ∞ +1 518-641-1280 Google Voice ∞ This email is: [ ] bloggable [x] ask first [ ] private ∞ Google me: http://www.google.com/search?q=andrew%20badera On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 10:23 AM, John Meyer wrote: > On 4/28/2010 8:21 AM, Dossy Shiobara wrote: >> >> On 4/28/10 10:18 AM, John Meyer wrote: >>> >>> Spam I understand, but are you actually trying to report plagarism on a >>> bloody tweet? Are you kidding me? We're you planning on selling that >>> bit of wisdom somewhere? Spinning it off for a book deal? >> >> You mean, like @shitmydadsays? >> > > > I would assume that if you're bundling tweets that you send out for free to > another format (aka a book) you would be adding some value in between the > two. >
Re: [twitter-dev] Really, You're not going to suspend @julianperretta?
On 4/28/2010 8:21 AM, Dossy Shiobara wrote: On 4/28/10 10:18 AM, John Meyer wrote: Spam I understand, but are you actually trying to report plagarism on a bloody tweet? Are you kidding me? We're you planning on selling that bit of wisdom somewhere? Spinning it off for a book deal? You mean, like @shitmydadsays? I would assume that if you're bundling tweets that you send out for free to another format (aka a book) you would be adding some value in between the two.
Re: [twitter-dev] Really, You're not going to suspend @julianperretta?
On 4/28/10 10:18 AM, John Meyer wrote: > > Spam I understand, but are you actually trying to report plagarism on a > bloody tweet? Are you kidding me? We're you planning on selling that > bit of wisdom somewhere? Spinning it off for a book deal? You mean, like @shitmydadsays? -- Dossy Shiobara | do...@panoptic.com | http://dossy.org/ Panoptic Computer Network | http://panoptic.com/ "He realized the fastest way to change is to laugh at your own folly -- then you can let go and quickly move on." (p. 70)
Re: [twitter-dev] Really, You're not going to suspend @julianperretta?
On 4/28/2010 7:50 AM, TJ Luoma wrote: He's been plagiarizing people for weeks, and has been reported for spam by dozens of people that I know about. Spam I understand, but are you actually trying to report plagarism on a bloody tweet? Are you kidding me? We're you planning on selling that bit of wisdom somewhere? Spinning it off for a book deal?
[twitter-dev] Really, You're not going to suspend @julianperretta?
He's been plagiarizing people for weeks, and has been reported for spam by dozens of people that I know about. Here's just one example: http://twitter.com/sween/status/3736262373 http://twitter.com/julianperretta/status/12991042505 But hey, I guess he's famous, so why make him follow the same rules as everyone else? TjL ps - yeah I know it's not about the API but it's not like you get a response from Twitter anywhere else. No, I'm not expecting one here