Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] ARM: mxs: Add mx28evk_auart_console target
Dear Andreas Wass, The target uses AUART 3 instead of the DUART for console output. Signed-off-by: Andreas Wass andreas.w...@dalelven.com Cc: Fabio Estevam fabio.este...@freescale.com Cc: Marek Vasut ma...@denx.de --- I wonder, why dont you add support for the TQ SoM in the first place? Best regards, Marek Vasut ___ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
[U-Boot] [PATCH] serial: arm_dcc: Convert to use default_serial_puts
Use default_serial_puts() instead of its own implementation.
Signed-off-by: Axel Lin axel@ingics.com
---
drivers/serial/arm_dcc.c | 8 +---
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/serial/arm_dcc.c b/drivers/serial/arm_dcc.c
index 29d9295..5dfb02f 100644
--- a/drivers/serial/arm_dcc.c
+++ b/drivers/serial/arm_dcc.c
@@ -123,12 +123,6 @@ static void arm_dcc_putc(char ch)
write_dcc(ch);
}
-static void arm_dcc_puts(const char *s)
-{
- while (*s)
- arm_dcc_putc(*s++);
-}
-
static int arm_dcc_tstc(void)
{
register unsigned int reg;
@@ -148,7 +142,7 @@ static struct serial_device arm_dcc_drv = {
.stop = NULL,
.setbrg = arm_dcc_setbrg,
.putc = arm_dcc_putc,
- .puts = arm_dcc_puts,
+ .puts = default_serial_puts,
.getc = arm_dcc_getc,
.tstc = arm_dcc_tstc,
};
--
1.8.1.2
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] ARM: mxs: Add mx28evk_auart_console target
Dear Marek I wonder, why dont you add support for the TQ SoM in the first place? I have plans to do it but I only have access to the board at work and I currently am very busy so have limited time testing the board setup, so I don't know when in time I will be able to submit such a patch. Regards Andreas ___ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
Re: [U-Boot] Please pull u-boot-ti/master - applied to a temporary repo, see inside
Hi Tom, On Fri, 16 Aug 2013 09:39:27 -0400, Tom Rini tr...@ti.com wrote: Hey, The following changes since commit fdce7b633a1de24456226b18527cc7900c34282a: gpio: omap5-uevm: Configure the tca6424 gpio expander (2013-07-30 09:21:42 -0400) are available in the git repository at: git://git.denx.de/u-boot-ti.git master for you to fetch changes up to 425faf74cd8189c87919f7e72a0101c684ee3b9f: Add TI816X evm board support (2013-08-15 18:38:37 -0400) Ash Charles (1): omap: overo: Use 200MHz SDRC timings for revision 1, 2 3 boards Enric Balletbo i Serra (5): ARM: IGEP0033: Remove undef of CONFIG_CMD_MEMTEST ARM: IGEP0033: Remove CYGNUS name from header. ARM: IGEP0033: Add support to boot from NAND. ARM: IGEP0033: Remove duplicate / unused #defines. ARM: igep00x0.h: Enable the use of CMD_EXT4, CMD_FS_GENERIC and zImage. Enric Balletbò i Serra (1): ARM: IGEP0033: Add support for Flattened Device Tree. Heiko Schocher (5): ARM: AM33xx: Move s_init to a common place arm/davinci/da850: add uart0_pins_rtscts and RMII_MHz_50_CLK in emac_pins_rmii pinmux bootstage: get more BOOTSTAGE_ID* in show_boot_progress() arm, da850: enable the correct uart in arch_cpu_init() arm, da850: add ipam390 board support Javier Martinez Canillas (1): OMAP3: igep00x0: allow booting with a FDT from MMC Lokesh Vutla (9): ARM: AM33xx: Cleanup dplls data ARM: AM33xx: Cleanup clocks layer musb: Disable extra prints ARM: AM43xx: Add Board files ARM: AM43xx: Add header files ARM: AM43xx: clocks: Add dpll and clock data ARM: OMAP: Add CONFIG_OMAP_COMMON ARM: AM43xx: Add build support ARM: AM43xx: Add config file Masahiro Yamada (1): ARM: omap24xx: remove remainders of dead board Naumann Andreas (1): ARM: omap3: Implement dpll5 (HSUSB clk) workaround for OMAP36xx/AM/DM37xx according to errata sprz318e. Steve Sakoman (1): omap: overo: update support for Micron 1GB POP TENART Antoine (3): Prepare for TI816X : reuse existing code from TI814X Add TI816X support Add TI816X evm board support Taras Kondratiuk (1): omap: emif: Set initial DDR PHY config first Tom Rini (9): am33xx: CONFIG_DMA_COHERENT defines are unused, remove am33xx: Stop using PHYS_DRAM_1 define am335x_evm: Use default baud rate table arm: spl: For Falcon Mode, set a default machid of ~0 am335x_evm: Bring in 'boot_fdt' logic from i.MX TI:am33xx: Create common config files for TI ARMv7 platforms, and AM33xx TI:omap5/dra7xx: Convert to ti_armv7_common.h TI:armv7: Enable CONFIG_CMD_SPI TI:armv7: Enable CONFIG_CMD_GPIO MAINTAINERS|5 + Makefile |2 +- arch/arm/config.mk |2 +- arch/arm/cpu/arm1136/omap24xx/reset.S | 26 - arch/arm/cpu/arm1136/omap24xx/timer.c | 136 -- arch/arm/cpu/arm926ejs/davinci/da850_lowlevel.c|4 + arch/arm/cpu/arm926ejs/davinci/da850_pinmux.c |6 + arch/arm/cpu/armv7/Makefile|2 +- arch/arm/cpu/armv7/am33xx/Makefile |7 + arch/arm/cpu/armv7/am33xx/board.c | 68 ++- arch/arm/cpu/armv7/am33xx/clock.c | 171 +++ arch/arm/cpu/armv7/am33xx/clock_am33xx.c | 495 +--- arch/arm/cpu/armv7/am33xx/clock_am43xx.c | 110 + arch/arm/cpu/armv7/am33xx/clock_ti814x.c | 120 + arch/arm/cpu/armv7/am33xx/clock_ti816x.c | 445 ++ arch/arm/cpu/armv7/am33xx/emif4.c | 11 +- arch/arm/cpu/armv7/omap-common/Makefile|2 +- arch/arm/cpu/armv7/omap-common/boot-common.c |3 +- arch/arm/cpu/armv7/omap-common/emif-common.c |2 +- arch/arm/cpu/armv7/omap3/clock.c | 20 +- arch/arm/cpu/armv7/omap3/lowlevel_init.S | 18 + arch/arm/include/asm/arch-am33xx/clock.h | 98 arch/arm/include/asm/arch-am33xx/clock_ti81xx.h| 142 ++ arch/arm/include/asm/arch-am33xx/clocks_am33xx.h |6 +- arch/arm/include/asm/arch-am33xx/cpu.h | 164 ++- arch/arm/include/asm/arch-am33xx/ddr_defs.h| 35 +- arch/arm/include/asm/arch-am33xx/hardware.h| 18 +- arch/arm/include/asm/arch-am33xx/hardware_am33xx.h | 15 + arch/arm/include/asm/arch-am33xx/hardware_am43xx.h | 54 +++ arch/arm/include/asm/arch-am33xx/hardware_ti814x.h | 15 + arch/arm/include/asm/arch-am33xx/hardware_ti816x.h | 61 +++ arch/arm/include/asm/arch-am33xx/mmc_host_def.h|3 + arch/arm/include/asm/arch-am33xx/mux.h
[U-Boot] Does u-boot support S3C24xx nand ecc?
Hi, Does anyone know if u-boot (version 2009.11) already contains supports to the hardware ECC for NAND in S3C24xx (Specifically S3C2416) SoC? Thanks in advance. -- I can't go back to yesterday - because I was a different person then ___ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 3/4] ARM: use r9 for gd
On 08/14/2013 08:25 PM, Jeroen Hofstee wrote: To be more EABI compliant and as a preparation for building with clang, use the platform-specific r9 register for gd instead of r8. note: The FIQ is not updated since it is not used in u-boot, and under discussion for the time being. The following checkpatch warning is ignored: WARNING: Use of volatile is usually wrong: see Documentation/volatile-considered-harmful.txt cc: Albert ARIBAUD albert.u.b...@aribaud.net Signed-off-by: Jeroen Hofstee jer...@myspectrum.nl --- arch/arm/config.mk | 2 +- arch/arm/include/asm/global_data.h | 2 +- arch/arm/lib/crt0.S| 16 3 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) This patch assumes only crt0.S sets the register used for gd in asm. I just noticed cpu/armv7/lowlevel_init.S does set gd manually, so all users of the common board.c are likely bricked with the patch as is. Looking into it Regards, Jeroen ___ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
Re: [U-Boot] merge arm64 to arm
FengHua feng...@phytium.com.cn writes: hi tom, hi albert, yes, it's right. the u-boot could be more uniformly and maintainable if merging armv8 to arm architecture. I will try to migrate arm64 to armv8 subarchitecture of arm. do you have any other advice? Why? The architectures are vastly different, arm64 (aarch64) being only loosely inspired by the 32-bit arm. It is not like with x86/amd64 where a lot of code can be shared. -- Måns Rullgård m...@mansr.com ___ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 3/4] ARM: use r9 for gd
On 08/17/2013 11:40 AM, Jeroen Hofstee wrote: On 08/14/2013 08:25 PM, Jeroen Hofstee wrote: To be more EABI compliant and as a preparation for building with clang, use the platform-specific r9 register for gd instead of r8. note: The FIQ is not updated since it is not used in u-boot, and under discussion for the time being. The following checkpatch warning is ignored: WARNING: Use of volatile is usually wrong: see Documentation/volatile-considered-harmful.txt cc: Albert ARIBAUD albert.u.b...@aribaud.net Signed-off-by: Jeroen Hofstee jer...@myspectrum.nl --- arch/arm/config.mk | 2 +- arch/arm/include/asm/global_data.h | 2 +- arch/arm/lib/crt0.S| 16 3 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) This patch assumes only crt0.S sets the register used for gd in asm. I just noticed cpu/armv7/lowlevel_init.S does set gd manually, so all users of the common board.c are likely bricked with the patch as is. Looking into it Looking into this, it seems lowlevel_init.S could simply be removed by placing the call to s_init at a better spot. As Tom pointed out, this is already being discussed at [1]. As that is a topic of its own I intend to simply change lowlevel_init.S to us r9 in this patchset. Regards, Jeroen [1] http://u-boot.10912.n7.nabble.com/PATCH-1-3-arm-spl-Fix-SPL-booting-for-OMAP3-td156990.html ___ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 1/4] ARM: make reserving the gd register a make variable
On 08/14/2013 08:25 PM, Jeroen Hofstee wrote: diff --git a/arch/arm/config.mk b/arch/arm/config.mk index 540a119..5e382ab 100644 --- a/arch/arm/config.mk +++ b/arch/arm/config.mk @@ -98,3 +98,5 @@ endif ifneq ($(CONFIG_SPL_BUILD),y) ALL-y += checkarmreloc endif + +OPTION_FIXED_GD=$(call cc-option, -ffixed-r8) I am leaking some debug code here, this can simply be an assignment by value instead of a cc-option check. Regards, Jeroen ___ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
Re: [U-Boot] merge arm64 to arm
-原始邮件- 发件人: Måns Rullgård m...@mansr.com 发送时间: 2013年8月17日 星期六 收件人: FengHua feng...@phytium.com.cn 抄送: u-boot@lists.denx.de, tr...@ti.com, scottw...@freescale.com 主题: Re: merge arm64 to arm FengHua feng...@phytium.com.cn writes: hi tom, hi albert, yes, it's right. the u-boot could be more uniformly and maintainable if merging armv8 to arm architecture. I will try to migrate arm64 to armv8 subarchitecture of arm. do you have any other advice? Why? The architectures are vastly different, arm64 (aarch64) being only loosely inspired by the 32-bit arm. It is not like with x86/amd64 where a lot of code can be shared. -- Måns Rullgård m...@mansr.com Of course, with a seperated architecture the arm64 code will be clear and simple. when it merged with arm a few file should be duplicated with the name _v8 appended and many macro switch should be added. but most of the code will be in armv8 directory which paralleled with armv7. it seems that this implementation are more nice. ___ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
Re: [U-Boot] merge arm64 to arm
On Sat, Aug 17, 2013 at 10:32:43PM +0800, FengHua wrote: -- ?: M??ns Rullg??rd m...@mansr.com : 2013???8???17??? ? ?: FengHua feng...@phytium.com.cn ??: u-boot@lists.denx.de, tr...@ti.com, scottw...@freescale.com ??: Re: merge arm64 to arm FengHua feng...@phytium.com.cn writes: hi tom, hi albert, yes, it's right. the u-boot could be more uniformly and maintainable if merging armv8 to arm architecture. I will try to migrate arm64 to armv8 subarchitecture of arm. do you have any other advice? Why? The architectures are vastly different, arm64 (aarch64) being only loosely inspired by the 32-bit arm. It is not like with x86/amd64 where a lot of code can be shared. -- M??ns Rullg??rd m...@mansr.com Of course, with a seperated architecture the arm64 code will be clear and simple. when it merged with arm a few file should be duplicated with the name _v8 appended and many macro switch should be added. but most of the code will be in armv8 directory which paralleled with armv7. it seems that this implementation are more nice. Exactly. Most things will end up in arch/arm/cpu/armv8/ and we won't have to duplicate the hook the arch up with the rest of U-Boot code, which is C anyhow, for the most part. -- Tom signature.asc Description: Digital signature ___ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
Re: [U-Boot] merge arm64 to arm
FengHua feng...@phytium.com.cn writes: FengHua feng...@phytium.com.cn writes: hi tom, hi albert, yes, it's right. the u-boot could be more uniformly and maintainable if merging armv8 to arm architecture. I will try to migrate arm64 to armv8 subarchitecture of arm. do you have any other advice? Why? The architectures are vastly different, arm64 (aarch64) being only loosely inspired by the 32-bit arm. It is not like with x86/amd64 where a lot of code can be shared. Of course, with a seperated architecture the arm64 code will be clear and simple. when it merged with arm a few file should be duplicated with the name _v8 appended and many macro switch should be added. but most of the code will be in armv8 directory which paralleled with armv7. it seems that this implementation are more nice. ARMv8 defines both a 32-bit (aarch32) and a 64-bit (aarch64) instruction set. The naming you are suggesting would be misleading. -- Måns Rullgård m...@mansr.com ___ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
Re: [U-Boot] Pull request - arm/zynq v2
Hi Michal, On Mon, 12 Aug 2013 09:05:00 +0200, Michal Simek mon...@monstr.eu wrote: Hi Albert, please pull these 3 zynq patches to your arm tree. There is still pending the arm: lds: Remove libgcc eabi exception handling tables patch. Have you considered to also add it? v2: - Changed email address, - There was incorrect rebase which I have fixed - correct sha1 now Thanks. Michal The following changes since commit a78dac79ede7fbb4c9e816abc879655540c3f076: nds32: fix the missing COBJS-y change (2013-08-09 01:51:24 +0800) are available in the git repository at: git://www.denx.de/git/u-boot-microblaze.git zynq for you to fetch changes up to 2d83d33a51926d6471eb9282d03d83783850d565: zynq: Enable axi ethernet and emaclite driver initialization (2013-08-12 08:59:56 +0200) Michal Simek (3): zynq: Add new ddrc driver for ECC support zynq: slcr: Wait 100ms till clk is properly setup zynq: Enable axi ethernet and emaclite driver initialization arch/arm/cpu/armv7/zynq/Makefile | 1 + arch/arm/cpu/armv7/zynq/ddrc.c | 50 ++ arch/arm/cpu/armv7/zynq/slcr.c | 2 +- arch/arm/include/asm/arch-zynq/hardware.h | 8 + arch/arm/include/asm/arch-zynq/sys_proto.h | 1 + board/xilinx/zynq/board.c | 19 6 files changed, 80 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) create mode 100644 arch/arm/cpu/armv7/zynq/ddrc.c I cannot merge these three commits without merging a lot of nds32 stuff too, apparently, and I don't want to. If this stuff is not needed for the three commits, then please rebase them so that they don't pull anything else in. Amicalement, -- Albert. ___ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
Re: [U-Boot] [PULL] : Please pull u-boot-imx - applied to a temporary repo, see inside
Hi Stefano,
On Mon, 12 Aug 2013 15:47:53 +0200, Stefano Babic sba...@denx.de
wrote:
Hi Albert,
please pull from u-boot-imx, thanks.
The following changes since commit fdce7b633a1de24456226b18527cc7900c34282a:
gpio: omap5-uevm: Configure the tca6424 gpio expander (2013-07-30
09:21:42 -0400)
are available in the git repository at:
git://www.denx.de/git/u-boot-imx.git master
for you to fetch changes up to 326ea986ac150acdc7656d57fca647db80b50158:
Merge git://git.denx.de/u-boot-arm (2013-07-31 11:30:38 +0200)
Dirk Behme (1):
mxc_gpio: Correct the GPIO handling in gpio_direction_output()
Eric Nelson (1):
mxc_ipuv3: fix memory alignment of framebuffer
Fabio Estevam (1):
mx6qsabrelite: Remove mx6qsabrelite code in favor of nitrogen6x
Marek Vasut (1):
ARM: mxs: Consolidate configuration options
Otavio Salvador (1):
wandboard: Use splash image at screen center by default
Pardeep Kumar Singla (2):
mx6: Factor out common HDMI setup code
mx6qsabresd: Add splash screen support via HDMI
Robert Winkler (2):
imx: Add documentation for imx specific commands
imx: nitrogen6x: mx6qsabrelite: Add support for DVI monitors
Stefano Babic (1):
Merge git://git.denx.de/u-boot-arm
MAINTAINERS|2 +-
README | 15 +
arch/arm/cpu/armv7/mx6/clock.c |8 +
arch/arm/cpu/armv7/mx6/soc.c | 43 +
arch/arm/imx-common/cmd_hdmidet.c |3 +-
arch/arm/include/asm/arch-mx6/clock.h |2 +-
arch/arm/include/asm/arch-mx6/mxc_hdmi.h |8 +
.../nitrogen6x/README.mx6qsabrelite} |0
board/boundary/nitrogen6x/nitrogen6x.c | 46 +-
board/freescale/mx6qsabrelite/Makefile | 28 -
board/freescale/mx6qsabrelite/mx6qsabrelite.c | 832
board/freescale/mx6sabresd/mx6sabresd.c| 64 +-
board/wandboard/wandboard.c| 44 +-
boards.cfg |2 +-
drivers/gpio/mxc_gpio.c|4 +-
drivers/video/mxc_ipuv3_fb.c |5 +-
include/configs/apx4devkit.h | 120 +--
include/configs/m28evk.h | 192 +
include/configs/mx23_olinuxino.h | 142 +---
include/configs/mx23evk.h | 115 +--
include/configs/mx28evk.h | 173 +---
include/configs/mx6qsabrelite.h| 284 ---
include/configs/mx6sabre_common.h |3 +-
include/configs/mx6sabresd.h | 19 +
include/configs/mxs.h | 191 +
include/configs/nitrogen6x.h | 81 +-
include/configs/sc_sps_1.h | 139 +---
include/configs/wandboard.h|2 +
28 files changed, 601 insertions(+), 1966 deletions(-)
rename board/{freescale/mx6qsabrelite/README =
boundary/nitrogen6x/README.mx6qsabrelite} (100%)
delete mode 100644 board/freescale/mx6qsabrelite/Makefile
delete mode 100644 board/freescale/mx6qsabrelite/mx6qsabrelite.c
delete mode 100644 include/configs/mx6qsabrelite.h
create mode 100644 include/configs/mxs.h
Applied to u-boot-arm/master, thanks -- BUT at the moment I cannot push
to u-boot-arm at denx. While this gets solved, I have set up a temporary
repo at 88.191.163.10. People can fetch it with
git fetch git://88.191.163.10/u-boot-arm
You won't have write access of course.
Amicalement,
--
Albert.
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
Re: [U-Boot] merge arm64 to arm
-原始邮件- 发件人: Måns Rullgård m...@mansr.com 发送时间: 2013年8月17日 星期六 收件人: FengHua feng...@phytium.com.cn 抄送: Måns Rullgård m...@mansr.com, trini tr...@ti.com, u-boot u-boot@lists.denx.de, albert.u.boot albert.u.b...@aribaud.net, scottwood scottw...@freescale.com 主题: Re: merge arm64 to arm FengHua feng...@phytium.com.cn writes: FengHua feng...@phytium.com.cn writes: hi tom, hi albert, yes, it's right. the u-boot could be more uniformly and maintainable if merging armv8 to arm architecture. I will try to migrate arm64 to armv8 subarchitecture of arm. do you have any other advice? Why? The architectures are vastly different, arm64 (aarch64) being only loosely inspired by the 32-bit arm. It is not like with x86/amd64 where a lot of code can be shared. Of course, with a seperated architecture the arm64 code will be clear and simple. when it merged with arm a few file should be duplicated with the name _v8 appended and many macro switch should be added. but most of the code will be in armv8 directory which paralleled with armv7. it seems that this implementation are more nice. ARMv8 defines both a 32-bit (aarch32) and a 64-bit (aarch64) instruction set. The naming you are suggesting would be misleading. aarch32 state is compatible with armv7. armv8 directory only provide aarch64 state support. as you said, it would be a little misleading. -- Måns Rullgård m...@mansr.com ___ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
