Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 02/14] spl: mmc: Fix build without LIBCOMMON_SUPPORT

2016-11-26 Thread Marek Vasut
On 11/26/2016 09:45 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 11:32:23PM +0100, Marek Vasut wrote:
>> If CONFIG_SPL_LIBCOMMON_SUPPORT is undefined, the following error
>> will happen, so fix it.
>>
>> In file included from common/spl/spl_mmc.c:11:0:
>> common/spl/spl_mmc.c: In function ‘spl_mmc_load_image’:
>> include/spl.h:18:30: error: label at end of compound statement
>>  #define MMCSD_MODE_UNDEFINED 0
>>   ^
>> common/spl/spl_mmc.c:335:7: note: in expansion of macro 
>> ‘MMCSD_MODE_UNDEFINED’
>>   case MMCSD_MODE_UNDEFINED:
>>^
>> Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut 
>> Cc: Pantelis Antoniou 
>> Cc: Tom Rini 
>> ---
>>  common/spl/spl_mmc.c | 4 +++-
>>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/common/spl/spl_mmc.c b/common/spl/spl_mmc.c
>> index 0b681c2..43c1030 100644
>> --- a/common/spl/spl_mmc.c
>> +++ b/common/spl/spl_mmc.c
>> @@ -343,10 +343,12 @@ static int spl_mmc_load_image(struct spl_image_info 
>> *spl_image,
>>  
>>  break;
>>  case MMCSD_MODE_UNDEFINED:
>> -#ifdef CONFIG_SPL_LIBCOMMON_SUPPORT
>>  default:
>> +{
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_SPL_LIBCOMMON_SUPPORT
>>  puts("spl: mmc: wrong boot mode\n");
>>  #endif
>> +}
>>  }
>>  
>>  return err;
> 
> I think we have something slightly off here.  Is
> CONFIG_SPL_SERIAL_SUPPORT also enabled?  That would turn this into a
> no-op as puts becomes a do { } while(0), if disabled.  So I think we
> should just remove the ifdef here.

No, series does not fit into SPL on this platform.

-- 
Best regards,
Marek Vasut
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot


Re: [U-Boot] Please pull u-boot-rockchip (take 2)

2016-11-26 Thread Tom Rini
On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 07:02:54PM -0700, Simon Glass wrote:

> Hi Tom,
> 
> I fixed up the checking of voltage and current to correct the test
> failure. Sorry for not spotting this correctly.
> 
> 
> The following changes since commit 543bd27353d2c5679057fe09aa2d02259687ff32:
> 
>   MAINTAINERS: SUNXI: Update maintainership (2016-11-22 09:07:26 -0500)
> 
> are available in the git repository at:
> 
>   git://git.denx.de/u-boot-rockchip.git
> 
> for you to fetch changes up to 6b388f0bed0e3d021128b4fc3c41da4572984e3b:
> 
>   rockchip: configs: correct partitions 'boot' size (2016-11-25 17:59:32 
> -0700)
> 

Applied to u-boot/master, thanks!

-- 
Tom


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot


Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 04/14] serial: 16550: Add getfcr accessor

2016-11-26 Thread Tom Rini
On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 11:32:25PM +0100, Marek Vasut wrote:

> Add function which allows fetching the default FCR register setting
> from platform data for DM , while retaining old behavior for non-DM
> by returning UART_FCRVAL.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut 
> Cc: Tom Rini 
> Cc: Simon Glass 

Reviewed-by: Tom Rini 

-- 
Tom


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot


Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 14/14] mips: jz47xx: Add Creator CI20 platform

2016-11-26 Thread Tom Rini
On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 11:32:35PM +0100, Marek Vasut wrote:

> From: Paul Burton 
> 
> Add support for the Creator CI20 platform based on the JZ4780 SoC.
> The DTS file comes from Linux 4.6 as of revision
> 78800558d104e003f9ae92e0107f1de39cf9de9f
> 
> So far, there are still a few details which will have to be fixed
> once they are fleshed out in Linux:
> - pinmux: Thus far, this board just pokes the pinmux registers to
>   set the pinmux. For MMC in SPL, this will have to stay.
> But for full u-boot a proper pinmux driver will have to
> be added once the pinmux semantics in DT are in mainline
> Linux.
> - ethernet,efuse: DT bindings are missing from mainline Linux.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut 
> Cc: Daniel Schwierzeck 
> Cc: Paul Burton 

This needs to be rebased on top of master as there's a lot of config.h
things that should be in the defconfig.

-- 
Tom


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot


Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 02/14] spl: mmc: Fix build without LIBCOMMON_SUPPORT

2016-11-26 Thread Tom Rini
On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 11:32:23PM +0100, Marek Vasut wrote:
> If CONFIG_SPL_LIBCOMMON_SUPPORT is undefined, the following error
> will happen, so fix it.
> 
> In file included from common/spl/spl_mmc.c:11:0:
> common/spl/spl_mmc.c: In function ‘spl_mmc_load_image’:
> include/spl.h:18:30: error: label at end of compound statement
>  #define MMCSD_MODE_UNDEFINED 0
>   ^
> common/spl/spl_mmc.c:335:7: note: in expansion of macro ‘MMCSD_MODE_UNDEFINED’
>   case MMCSD_MODE_UNDEFINED:
>^
> Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut 
> Cc: Pantelis Antoniou 
> Cc: Tom Rini 
> ---
>  common/spl/spl_mmc.c | 4 +++-
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/common/spl/spl_mmc.c b/common/spl/spl_mmc.c
> index 0b681c2..43c1030 100644
> --- a/common/spl/spl_mmc.c
> +++ b/common/spl/spl_mmc.c
> @@ -343,10 +343,12 @@ static int spl_mmc_load_image(struct spl_image_info 
> *spl_image,
>  
>   break;
>   case MMCSD_MODE_UNDEFINED:
> -#ifdef CONFIG_SPL_LIBCOMMON_SUPPORT
>   default:
> + {
> +#ifdef CONFIG_SPL_LIBCOMMON_SUPPORT
>   puts("spl: mmc: wrong boot mode\n");
>  #endif
> + }
>   }
>  
>   return err;

I think we have something slightly off here.  Is
CONFIG_SPL_SERIAL_SUPPORT also enabled?  That would turn this into a
no-op as puts becomes a do { } while(0), if disabled.  So I think we
should just remove the ifdef here.

-- 
Tom


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot


Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 03/14] mmc: Fix warning if debug() is not used

2016-11-26 Thread Tom Rini
On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 11:32:24PM +0100, Marek Vasut wrote:

> If debug() is not used, then the whole content of debug(...) will
> be removed by the preprocessor, which will result in the following
> warning. This patch adds __maybe_unused annotation to fix this.
> 
> drivers/mmc/mmc.c: In function ‘mmc_init’:
> drivers/mmc/mmc.c:1685:11: warning: variable ‘start’ set but not used 
> [-Wunused-but-set-variable]
>   unsigned start;
> 
> Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut 
> Cc: Pantelis Antoniou 
> Cc: Tom Rini 

Reviewed-by: Tom Rini 

-- 
Tom


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot


Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 11/11] configs: dra7xx: Enable lp873x options

2016-11-26 Thread Tom Rini
On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 01:25:34PM +0530, Lokesh Vutla wrote:

> From: Keerthy 
> 
> DRA71-evm uses LP873x regulator. Enable lp873x PMIC config options.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Keerthy 
> Signed-off-by: Lokesh Vutla 

Reviewed-by: Tom Rini 

-- 
Tom


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot


Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 10/11] configs: dra7xx: Enable pmic/regulator options

2016-11-26 Thread Tom Rini
On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 01:25:33PM +0530, Lokesh Vutla wrote:

> Enable pmic/regulator config options.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Lokesh Vutla 

Reviewed-by: Tom Rini 

-- 
Tom


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot


Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 09/11] configs: dra7xx: hs: Enable DM_ETH

2016-11-26 Thread Tom Rini
On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 01:25:32PM +0530, Lokesh Vutla wrote:

> Enable DM_ETH for hs boards.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Lokesh Vutla 

Reviewed-by: Tom Rini 

-- 
Tom


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot


Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 08/11] configs: ti_omap5_common: Select dtb name for dra71x

2016-11-26 Thread Tom Rini
On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 01:25:31PM +0530, Lokesh Vutla wrote:

> From: Nishanth Menon 
> 
> Select dtb name for dra71x-evm.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Nishanth Menon 

Reviewed-by: Tom Rini 

-- 
Tom


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot


Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 07/11] ARM: dts: dra71x-evm: Add DT support

2016-11-26 Thread Tom Rini
On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 01:25:30PM +0530, Lokesh Vutla wrote:

> Add DT support for dra71-evm and built it as part of FIT image.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Lokesh Vutla 

Reviewed-by: Tom Rini 

-- 
Tom


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot


Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 06/11] ARM: dts: dra7xx: sync DT with latest Linux

2016-11-26 Thread Tom Rini
On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 01:25:29PM +0530, Lokesh Vutla wrote:

> Sync all dra7xx based dts files with latest Linux
> 
> Signed-off-by: Lokesh Vutla 

Reviewed-by: Tom Rini 

-- 
Tom


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot


Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 05/11] ARM: OMAP4+: Add support for getting pbias info from board

2016-11-26 Thread Tom Rini
On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 01:25:28PM +0530, Lokesh Vutla wrote:

> Palmas driver assumes it is always TPS659xx regulator on all DRA7xx based
> boards to enable mmc regulator. This is not true always like in case of
> DRA71x-evm. So get this information based on the board.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Lokesh Vutla 
> Signed-off-by: Vignesh R 
> Signed-off-by: Nishanth Menon 

Reviewed-by: Tom Rini 

-- 
Tom


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot


Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 04/11] board: ti: dra71x-evm: Add PMIC support

2016-11-26 Thread Tom Rini
On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 01:25:27PM +0530, Lokesh Vutla wrote:

> From: Keerthy 
> 
> Add the pmic_data for LP873x PMIC which is used to power
> up dra71x-evm.
> 
> Note: As per the DM[1] DRA71x supports only OP_NOM. So, updating
> the efuse registers only to use OPP_NOM irrespective of any
> CONFIG_DRA7__OPP_{NOM,od,high} is defined.
> 
> [1] http://www.ti.com/product/DRA718/technicaldocuments
> 
> Signed-off-by: Keerthy 
> Signed-off-by: Lokesh Vutla 

Reviewed-by: Tom Rini 

-- 
Tom


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot


Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 03/11] board: ti: dra72: Introduce optimization for rgmii timing for rev C

2016-11-26 Thread Tom Rini
On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 01:25:26PM +0530, Lokesh Vutla wrote:

> From: Nishanth Menon 
> 
> Rev C version of EVM does require IODelay to be configured for RGMII
> pins in MANUAL_1 configuration. Update the same based on PG2.0 initial
> simulation values.
> Data based on PCT_DRA72x_SR2.0_SR1.0_v1.3.0.7
> 
> Signed-off-by: Nishanth Menon 
> Signed-off-by: Lokesh Vutla 

Reviewed-by: Tom Rini 

-- 
Tom


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot


Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 02/11] board: ti: dra71x-evm: Add mux settings

2016-11-26 Thread Tom Rini
On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 01:25:25PM +0530, Lokesh Vutla wrote:

> Add mux and iodelay settings for dra71x-evm.
> Data generated using PCT_DRA71x_SR2.0_v1.0.0.0 version (June 2016).
> 
> Signed-off-by: Lokesh Vutla 

Reviewed-by: Tom Rini 

-- 
Tom


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot


Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 01/11] board: ti: dra71x-evm: Add epprom support

2016-11-26 Thread Tom Rini
On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 01:25:24PM +0530, Lokesh Vutla wrote:

> The dra71x-evm is a board based on TI's DRA718 processor targeting 
> BOM-optimized
> entry infotainment systems such as display audio and is a software compatible
> derivative of the highly successful DRA74 and DRA72 processor families.
> More information can be found here[1].
> 
> Add epprom detection for dra71-evm.
> 
> [1] http://www.ti.com/product/dra718
> 
> Signed-off-by: Lokesh Vutla 

Reviewed-by: Tom Rini 

-- 
Tom


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot


Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 2/2] ARM: am57xx_evm: enable DFU support

2016-11-26 Thread Tom Rini
On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 02:25:55PM +0530, Sekhar Nori wrote:

> AM57xx GP EVM has USB2 port of the SoC exposed as
> USB client port.
> 
> It is useful to be able to use this port for USB
> DFU downloads.
> 
> Enable USB DFU support. Tested on AM57x GP EVM Rev
> A3 using DFU to download to connected SD card.
> 
> configs for HS version of the AM57x EVM are
> included in the patch but not really tested.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Sekhar Nori 

Reviewed-by: Tom Rini 

-- 
Tom


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot


Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 1/2] ARM: ti: consolidate dfu environment variables

2016-11-26 Thread Tom Rini
On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 02:25:54PM +0530, Sekhar Nori wrote:

> Introduce include/environment/ti/dfu.h that
> consolidates environment variable definitions
> for various TI boards that support DFU today.
> 
> Tested on AM335x EVM, AM437x SK EVM and DRA74x
> EVM by using DFU to write to SD card.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Sekhar Nori 

Reviewed-by: Tom Rini 

-- 
Tom


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot


Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 9/9] ti_armv7_common: env: Increase IO buffer size

2016-11-26 Thread Tom Rini
On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 11:14:26AM +0530, Lokesh Vutla wrote:

> There are certain environment variables whose length is greater than
> the defined IO buffer size. So, increase the IO buffer size to print the
> entire variables.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Lokesh Vutla 

Reviewed-by: Tom Rini 

-- 
Tom


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot


Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 8/9] ARM: dts: AM571x-IDK Initial Support

2016-11-26 Thread Tom Rini
On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 11:14:25AM +0530, Lokesh Vutla wrote:

> From: Schuyler Patton 
> 
> Add initial DTS support for AM571-IDK evm.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Schuyler Patton 
> Signed-off-by: Nishanth Menon 
> Signed-off-by: Lokesh Vutla 

Reviewed-by: Tom Rini 

-- 
Tom


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot


Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 7/9] board: ti: am57xx: Add support for the am571x idk

2016-11-26 Thread Tom Rini
On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 11:14:24AM +0530, Lokesh Vutla wrote:

> From: Steve Kipisz 
> 
> The AM571x Industrial Development Kit (IDK) is a board based on TI's
> AM571x SoC which has a single core 1.5GHz Cortex-A15processor. This
> board is a development platform for the Industrial Market with:
> 
> - 1GB of DDR3L
> - Dual 1Gbps Ethernet
> - HDMI
> - PRU-ICSS
> - uSD
> - 16GB eMMC
> - CAN
> - RS-485
> - PCIe
> - USB3.0
> - Video Input Port
> - Industrial IO port and expansion connector
> 
> The PRU/ICSS will be supported by 3rd party software for EtherCat,
> Profibus, and other Industrial protocols.
> 
> The link to the data sheet and TRM can be found here:
> http://www.ti.com/product/AM5718
> 
> Signed-off-by: Steve Kipisz 
> Signed-off-by: Nishanth Menon 
> Signed-off-by: Lokesh Vutla 

Reviewed-by: Tom Rini 

-- 
Tom


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot


Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 6/9] board: ti: am572x-idk: Update pinmux using latest PMT

2016-11-26 Thread Tom Rini
On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 11:14:23AM +0530, Lokesh Vutla wrote:

> Update the board pinmux for AM572x-IDK board using latest PMT[1] and the
> board files named am572x_idk_v1p3b_sr2p0 that were autogenerated on
> 20th October, 2016 by "Steve Kipisz " and
> "Tom Johnson ".
> 
> [1] https://dev.ti.com/pinmux/app.html#/default/
> 
> Signed-off-by: Nishanth Menon 
> Signed-off-by: Lokesh Vutla 

Reviewed-by: Tom Rini 

-- 
Tom


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot


Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 5/9] board: ti: am572x: Add pinmux for X15/GPEVM SR2.0 using latest PMT

2016-11-26 Thread Tom Rini
On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 11:14:22AM +0530, Lokesh Vutla wrote:

> From: Nishanth Menon 
> 
> Update the board pinmux for AM572x-IDK board using latest PMT[1] and the
> board files named am572x_gp_evm_A3a_sr2p0 that were autogenerated on
> 19th October, 2016 by "Ahmad Rashed".
> 
> [1] https://dev.ti.com/pinmux/app.html#/default/
> 
> Signed-off-by: Nishanth Menon 
> Signed-off-by: Lokesh Vutla 

Reviewed-by: Tom Rini 

-- 
Tom


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot


Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 4/9] board: ti: am57xx: Update SR1.1 RGMII0 iodelay timings for x15/GPEVM

2016-11-26 Thread Tom Rini
On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 11:14:21AM +0530, Lokesh Vutla wrote:

> From: Nishanth Menon 
> 
> Update the timing for RGMII0 interface based on
> PCT_DRA75x_DRA74x_SR1.1_v1.3.10 version (Jan 2016). This update
> is for SR1.1
> 
> Signed-off-by: Nishanth Menon 
> Signed-off-by: Lokesh Vutla 

Reviewed-by: Tom Rini 

-- 
Tom


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot


Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 3/9] board: ti: am57xx: Add support for detection of X15 revb1

2016-11-26 Thread Tom Rini
On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 11:14:20AM +0530, Lokesh Vutla wrote:

> BeagleBoard-X15 Rev B1 with SR1.1 platform have incompatible changes for HDMI
> GPIO requiring new dtb support. This implies we have to properly identify
> the platform now as well. Hence provide a different board name for the
> Rev B1 variants.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Lokesh Vutla 

Reviewed-by: Tom Rini 

-- 
Tom


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot


Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/9] board: ti: am57xx: Add support for detection of reva3 variations for GPEVM

2016-11-26 Thread Tom Rini
On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 11:14:19AM +0530, Lokesh Vutla wrote:

> From: Nishanth Menon 
> 
> AM57xx evm Rev A3 with SR2.0 platform have incompatible changes for HDMI
> GPIO requiring new dtb support. This implies we have to properly identify
> the platform now as well. Hence provide a different board name for the
> Rev A3 variations.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Nishanth Menon 
> Signed-off-by: Lokesh Vutla 

Reviewed-by: Tom Rini 

-- 
Tom


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot


Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/9] ARM: dts: am57xx: sync DT with latest Linux

2016-11-26 Thread Tom Rini
On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 11:14:18AM +0530, Lokesh Vutla wrote:

> Sync all am57xx based dts files with latest Linux
> 
> Signed-off-by: Lokesh Vutla 

Reviewed-by: Tom Rini 

-- 
Tom


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot


Re: [U-Boot] Please pull u-boot-rockchip

2016-11-26 Thread Tom Rini
On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 12:39:13PM -0700, Simon Glass wrote:

> Hi Tom,
> 
> This includes support for minnie and mickey Chromebooks, rk3036 USB
> support, some power improvements and other minor things.
> 
> 
> The following changes since commit 543bd27353d2c5679057fe09aa2d02259687ff32:
> 
>   MAINTAINERS: SUNXI: Update maintainership (2016-11-22 09:07:26 -0500)
> 
> are available in the git repository at:
> 
>   git://git.denx.de/u-boot-rockchip.git
> 
> for you to fetch changes up to fc334a074b7309e08c8f9571f4e5025f345a:
> 
>   rockchip: configs: correct partitions 'boot' size (2016-11-25 10:03:32 
> -0700)
> 

Applied to u-boot/master, thanks!

-- 
Tom


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot


Re: [U-Boot] Please pull u-boot-fdt

2016-11-26 Thread Tom Rini
On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 09:51:02AM -0700, Simon Glass wrote:

> Hi Tom.
> 
> The following changes since commit 543bd27353d2c5679057fe09aa2d02259687ff32:
> 
>   MAINTAINERS: SUNXI: Update maintainership (2016-11-22 09:07:26 -0500)
> 
> are available in the git repository at:
> 
>   git://git.denx.de/u-boot-fdt.git
> 
> for you to fetch changes up to 643f8d4c07788f28ad283e3fcb29d88a4b16a4be:
> 
>   MAINTAINERS: Fix syntax and update filename for FDT (2016-11-25
> 09:48:09 -0700)
> 

Applied to u-boot/master, thanks!

-- 
Tom


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot


[U-Boot] u-boot 2016.11 and A33 1G ram detection.

2016-11-26 Thread 8001010

Uboot reports 512Mb on my ET_Q8_V2.0 allwinner  A33 tablet but it have 1G Ram 
(android and my eyes on pcb see it!),
kernel(4.9-rc6) report 512Mb too.

Is ram autodetected or i can change something in dts(i suppose) to permit 
correct detection?

Uboot pass to kernel ram size or kernel detect itself ?

Thank

___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot


Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 2/4] arm: Remove smdk2410 board

2016-11-26 Thread Tom Rini
On Sat, Nov 26, 2016 at 07:30:36PM +0530, Jagan Teki wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 26, 2016 at 7:14 PM, Tom Rini  wrote:
> > On Sat, Nov 26, 2016 at 07:03:33PM +0530, Jagan Teki wrote:
> >> On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 6:31 PM, Simon Glass  wrote:
> >> > This board has not been converted to DM_SERIAL by the deadline.
> >> > Remove it.
> >> >
> >> > Signed-off-by: Simon Glass 
> >> > ---
> >>
> >> < snip>
> >>
> >> >  CONFIG_ARCH_SHARK
> >> > -CONFIG_ARCH_SMDK2410
> >>
> >> Code relate to this still there in arch/arm/include/asm/mach-types.h,
> >
> > That's a file we sync(ed) from the kernel and should leave alone, imho.
> 
> I always think that the code related to the CONFIG_* which are listed
> in config_whitelist.txt should be dropped as there is no usage on the
> tree.

Yes, but that's a special case of a file that we should just not touch.

I will however accept the argument that we should re-sync the file with
a generated copy from v4.8 for example but only take the MACH_TYPE_xxx
part and remove all of the machine_is_xxx parts of the file.

-- 
Tom


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot


Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 2/4] arm: Remove smdk2410 board

2016-11-26 Thread Jagan Teki
On Sat, Nov 26, 2016 at 7:14 PM, Tom Rini  wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 26, 2016 at 07:03:33PM +0530, Jagan Teki wrote:
>> On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 6:31 PM, Simon Glass  wrote:
>> > This board has not been converted to DM_SERIAL by the deadline.
>> > Remove it.
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: Simon Glass 
>> > ---
>>
>> < snip>
>>
>> >  CONFIG_ARCH_SHARK
>> > -CONFIG_ARCH_SMDK2410
>>
>> Code relate to this still there in arch/arm/include/asm/mach-types.h,
>
> That's a file we sync(ed) from the kernel and should leave alone, imho.

I always think that the code related to the CONFIG_* which are listed
in config_whitelist.txt should be dropped as there is no usage on the
tree.

thanks!
-- 
Jagan Teki
Free Software Engineer | www.openedev.com
U-Boot, Linux | Upstream Maintainer
Hyderabad, India.
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot


Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 2/4] arm: Remove smdk2410 board

2016-11-26 Thread Tom Rini
On Sat, Nov 26, 2016 at 07:03:33PM +0530, Jagan Teki wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 6:31 PM, Simon Glass  wrote:
> > This board has not been converted to DM_SERIAL by the deadline.
> > Remove it.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Simon Glass 
> > ---
> 
> < snip>
> 
> >  CONFIG_ARCH_SHARK
> > -CONFIG_ARCH_SMDK2410
> 
> Code relate to this still there in arch/arm/include/asm/mach-types.h,

That's a file we sync(ed) from the kernel and should leave alone, imho.

-- 
Tom


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot


Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 4/4] serial: Drop the s3c24x0 serial driver

2016-11-26 Thread Jagan Teki
On Sat, Nov 26, 2016 at 12:55 PM, David Müller (ELSOFT AG)
 wrote:
> Simon Glass wrote:
>> This is not used by any boards. Drop it.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Simon Glass 
>
> Acked-by: David Müller 

Reviewed-by: Jagan Teki 

thanks!
-- 
Jagan Teki
Free Software Engineer | www.openedev.com
U-Boot, Linux | Upstream Maintainer
Hyderabad, India.
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot


Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 3/4] arm: Remove VCMA9 board

2016-11-26 Thread Jagan Teki
On Sat, Nov 26, 2016 at 12:55 PM, David Müller (ELSOFT AG)
 wrote:
> Simon Glass wrote:
>> This board has not been converted to DM_SERIAL by the deadline.
>> Remove it.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Simon Glass 
>
> Acked-by: David Müller 

Reviewed-by: Jagan Teki 

thanks!
-- 
Jagan Teki
Free Software Engineer | www.openedev.com
U-Boot, Linux | Upstream Maintainer
Hyderabad, India.
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot


Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 2/4] arm: Remove smdk2410 board

2016-11-26 Thread Jagan Teki
On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 6:31 PM, Simon Glass  wrote:
> This board has not been converted to DM_SERIAL by the deadline.
> Remove it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Simon Glass 
> ---

< snip>

>  CONFIG_ARCH_SHARK
> -CONFIG_ARCH_SMDK2410

Code relate to this still there in arch/arm/include/asm/mach-types.h,
better to remove.

thanks!
-- 
Jagan Teki
Free Software Engineer | www.openedev.com
U-Boot, Linux | Upstream Maintainer
Hyderabad, India.
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot


Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] armv8/spin_table.c: fix spin table release address

2016-11-26 Thread Tsung-Han Lin
Oops,

Seems like I misunderstood this approach.
Thanks for the clarification!

Regards,

2016-11-26 11:17 GMT+09:00 Masahiro Yamada :

> 2016-11-25 7:38 GMT+09:00 Tsung-Han Lin :
> > Since only the master core will relocate itself, the spin-table release
> > address seen by master core and other slave cores is different.
> > This commit fixes this issue by recalculating the spin-table release
> > address' offset instead of leaving it to compiler.
>
> No.
> You should bring the slaves cores in after relocation
> so that the slaves enter the *relocated* _start.
>
> --
> Best Regards
> Masahiro Yamada
>



-- 
Tsung-Han "*Johnny*" Lin

Page: http://tsunghanlin.github.com/
Email: tsunghan...@gmail.com
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot