Hello Heiko,
On 5/6/2014 10:46 AM, Heiko Schocher wrote:
Hello Christian,
Am 06.05.2014 13:30, schrieb Christian Riesch:
Tom,
Thank you very much for your investigations :-)
--On April 26, 2014 13:34 -0400 Tom Taylor ttaylor.ta...@gmail.com
wrote:
I'm a U-Boot newbie so please feel free to correct how I'm reporting
this
issue..
I recently downloaded the 2014.04-rc3 snapshot to build U-Boot for my
custom DA850-based board. The only change was to add a new target
dav850evm_nand in boards.cfg with the added parameter USE_NAND.
The resulting AIS file was programmed into EVM-compatible NAND using
standard sfh_OMAP-L138 method.
The board failed to boot, and stayed in a loop printing the SPL console
message repeatedly.
After some debugging with CCS 5.5 and an XDS100v2, I found that
incorrect
code was being loaded into the 0xc108000 RAM destination. The
da850evm.h
file defines CONFIG_SYS_NAND_U_BOOT_OFFS as 0x28000, which
corresponds to
an AIS offset of 0x8000 but the u-boot header did not appear there
in the
AIS file. A search revealed that the Makefile catenated u-boot
immediately after the SPL without any padding.
Further investigation revealed that the target Makefile needs
CONFIG_SPL_MAX_SIZE to be defined as 0x8000 in order for the padding to
be performed properly; however, this constant was apparently deleted
during a series of changes in April, 2013 to accommodate separate code
and BSS size limits for another target. In its place,
CONFIG_SPL_MAX_FOOTPRINT was defined as 32768. Unfortunately, the
da850evm Makefile does not refer to this constant.
To solve the problem, I added the following 2 lines in my
custom-modified
da850evm.h:
# define CONFIG_SPL_PAD_TO 0x8000
# define CONFIG_SPL_MAX_SIZE 0x8000
although the first line may not be strictly required.
Yes, CONFIG_SPL_PAD_TO is currently not used for the 'make
u-boot.ais' target in the Makefile. Instead, the Makefile uses
CONFIG_SPL_MAX_SIZE for padding the SPL, which is probably wrong.
Yes, CONFIG_SPL_PAD_TO is the correct define. On the other hand
the question is is CONFIG_SPL_PAD_TO not always equal to
CONFIG_SPL_MAX_SIZE ?
This solved the
problem and allowed the board to boot.
Doesn't this mean that other similar targets may be broken?
I think yes.
I think the right fix would be to change the Makefile to use
CONFIG_SPL_PAD_TO instead of CONFIG_SPL_MAX_SIZE for the u-boot.ais
target.
diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile
index ff38a43..869f442 100644
--- a/Makefile
+++ b/Makefile
@@ -890,7 +890,7 @@ MKIMAGEFLAGS_u-boot-spl.ais = -s -n $(if
$(CONFIG_AIS_CONFIG_FILE), \
spl/u-boot-spl.ais: spl/u-boot-spl.bin FORCE
$(call if_changed,mkimage)
-OBJCOPYFLAGS_u-boot.ais = -I binary -O binary
--pad-to=$(CONFIG_SPL_MAX_SIZE)
+OBJCOPYFLAGS_u-boot.ais = -I binary -O binary
--pad-to=$(CONFIG_SPL_PAD_TO)
u-boot.ais: spl/u-boot-spl.ais u-boot.img FORCE
$(call if_changed,pad_cat)
And then check all ARM926EJS/Davinci configurations that use SPL:
(extending Tom Rini's grep command from his email)
$ git grep -l ARM926EJS include/configs/ | xargs grep -l DAVINCI |
xargs grep -l _SPL_
include/configs/cam_enc_4xx.h
include/configs/da830evm.h
include/configs/da850evm.h
include/configs/hawkboard.h
include/configs/ipam390.h
For the cam_enc_4xx CONFIG_SPL_PAD_TO is already defined, so it
should work fine after fixing the Makefile. Heiko, any comments on
this? Are you actually using the u-boot.ais target?
I have no board to test, but I think it is used.
da830evm and hawkboard did not use CONFIG_SPL_MAX_SIZE, so no need to
fix them.
da850evm: We should add CONFIG_SPL_PAD_TO as already suggested by you.
ipam390.h: I think the #define CONFIG_SPL_MAX_SIZE 0x2 should be
removed or replaced by #define CONFIG_SPL_PAD_TO 0x2. But
actually the board has been added after the commits that replace grep
-lr CONFIG_SPL_MAX_SIZE by CONFIG_SPL_MAX_FOOTPRINT, so why
didn't that issue come up when adding the board to mainline? Heiko,
any comments? Are you using make u-boot.ais here or something else?
I am not sure, if we can just remove CONFIG_SPL_MAX_SIZE for this
board, as it maybe has only 0x2 space for the SPL ?
maybe:
#if !defined(CONFIG_SPL_PAD_TO)
define CONFIG_SPL_PAD_TO CONFIG_SPL_MAX_SIZE
#endif
is better? Heh, thats the case, see:
./include/config_fallbacks.h
so, your Makefile patch should be Ok ...
bye,
Heiko
There's currently only 0x8000 space allocated for the SPL. The first
0x2 byte block is allocated for the NAND-resident environment. From
da850evm.h:
#ifdef CONFIG_USE_NAND
:
#define CONFIG_ENV_OFFSET0x0 /* Block 0--not used by bootcode */
#define CONFIG_ENV_SIZE(128 10)
Anyone customizing the build has to of course ensure that that the boot
offset passed to nand_spl_load_image() is consistent . Again from
da850evm.h:
#define CONFIG_SYS_NAND_U_BOOT_OFFS0x28000
Because of include/config_fallbacks, it would seem like Christian's
suggestion to change
