[U-Boot] FW: FW: [PATCH v3] AT91: pio: Add PIO3 features
Hi Wolfgang, Any suggestion or feedback? BR, Eric -Original Message- From: u-boot-boun...@lists.denx.de [mailto:u-boot-boun...@lists.denx.de] On Behalf Of Xu, Hong Sent: Wednesday, December 14, 2011 2:24 PM To: w...@denx.de; albert.u.b...@aribaud.net Cc: u-boot@lists.denx.de; Lin, JM; Vilchez, Patrice Subject: [U-Boot] FW: FW: [PATCH v3] AT91: pio: Add PIO3 features Hi Wolfgang Albert, It seems the AT91 maintainer is not active for a little bit long time. The heads published on http://git.denx.de was updated 4 months ago. The patches newly sent to list are not handled any more. So, May I propose we act as something like a co-maintainer so that Albert can pull the AT91 patches from us in case the current maintainer does not have time? Or we can take care of AT91 if the current maintainer won't work for it any longer. I think we can allocate necessary resource on AT91 support in U-Boot. Thanks. BR, Eric -Original Message- From: u-boot-boun...@lists.denx.de [mailto:u-boot-boun...@lists.denx.de] On Behalf Of Xu, Hong Sent: Wednesday, December 07, 2011 9:28 AM To: albert.u.b...@aribaud.net; u-b...@emk-elektronik.de Cc: u-boot@lists.denx.de Subject: [U-Boot] FW: [PATCH v3] AT91: pio: Add PIO3 features Ping again ... BR, Eric [... ...] ___ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
[U-Boot] FW: FW: [PATCH v3] AT91: pio: Add PIO3 features
Hi Wolfgang Albert, It seems the AT91 maintainer is not active for a little bit long time. The heads published on http://git.denx.de was updated 4 months ago. The patches newly sent to list are not handled any more. So, May I propose we act as something like a co-maintainer so that Albert can pull the AT91 patches from us in case the current maintainer does not have time? Or we can take care of AT91 if the current maintainer won't work for it any longer. I think we can allocate necessary resource on AT91 support in U-Boot. Thanks. BR, Eric -Original Message- From: u-boot-boun...@lists.denx.de [mailto:u-boot-boun...@lists.denx.de] On Behalf Of Xu, Hong Sent: Wednesday, December 07, 2011 9:28 AM To: albert.u.b...@aribaud.net; u-b...@emk-elektronik.de Cc: u-boot@lists.denx.de Subject: [U-Boot] FW: [PATCH v3] AT91: pio: Add PIO3 features Ping again ... BR, Eric -Original Message- From: Xu, Hong Sent: Tuesday, November 29, 2011 9:55 AM To: 'albert.u.b...@aribaud.net' Cc: 'u-boot@lists.denx.de'; 'w...@denx.de' Subject: FW: [U-Boot] [PATCH v3] AT91: pio: Add PIO3 features Hi Albert, It's seems Reinhard is in hibernate state. ;-) Could you please give me a hint how to make AT91 patches move forward? Thanks. BR, Eric -Original Message- From: u-boot-boun...@lists.denx.de [mailto:u-boot-boun...@lists.denx.de] On Behalf Of Hong Xu Sent: Monday, November 21, 2011 10:21 AM To: u-b...@emk-elektronik.de Cc: u-boot@lists.denx.de Subject: Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v3] AT91: pio: Add PIO3 features ping ... BR, Eric On 11/16/2011 06:47 PM, Hong Xu wrote: This patch adds the support for new PIO controller introduced by some AT91 SoCs. New features include * More peripheral multiplexing * Pull-down, Schmitt trigger, Debouncer * More irq trigger mode (may be not interesting in U-Boot) Signed-off-by: Hong Xu hong...@atmel.com --- Change for v3 * CONFIG_CPU_HAS_PIO3 - ATMEL_CPU_HAS_PIO3 PIO3 is a feature of CPU, not a configuration item arch/arm/include/asm/arch-at91/at91_pio.h | 48 ++- drivers/gpio/at91_gpio.c | 130 +++- 2 files changed, 171 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-at91/at91_pio.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-at91/at91_pio.h index 416cabf..069368d 100644 --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-at91/at91_pio.h +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-at91/at91_pio.h @@ -4,6 +4,7 @@ * Copyright (C) 2005 Ivan Kokshaysky * Copyright (C) SAN People [...] ___ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot ___ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot ___ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
[U-Boot] FW: [PATCH v3] AT91: pio: Add PIO3 features
Ping again ... BR, Eric -Original Message- From: Xu, Hong Sent: Tuesday, November 29, 2011 9:55 AM To: 'albert.u.b...@aribaud.net' Cc: 'u-boot@lists.denx.de'; 'w...@denx.de' Subject: FW: [U-Boot] [PATCH v3] AT91: pio: Add PIO3 features Hi Albert, It's seems Reinhard is in hibernate state. ;-) Could you please give me a hint how to make AT91 patches move forward? Thanks. BR, Eric -Original Message- From: u-boot-boun...@lists.denx.de [mailto:u-boot-boun...@lists.denx.de] On Behalf Of Hong Xu Sent: Monday, November 21, 2011 10:21 AM To: u-b...@emk-elektronik.de Cc: u-boot@lists.denx.de Subject: Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v3] AT91: pio: Add PIO3 features ping ... BR, Eric On 11/16/2011 06:47 PM, Hong Xu wrote: This patch adds the support for new PIO controller introduced by some AT91 SoCs. New features include * More peripheral multiplexing * Pull-down, Schmitt trigger, Debouncer * More irq trigger mode (may be not interesting in U-Boot) Signed-off-by: Hong Xu hong...@atmel.com --- Change for v3 * CONFIG_CPU_HAS_PIO3 - ATMEL_CPU_HAS_PIO3 PIO3 is a feature of CPU, not a configuration item arch/arm/include/asm/arch-at91/at91_pio.h | 48 ++- drivers/gpio/at91_gpio.c | 130 +++- 2 files changed, 171 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-at91/at91_pio.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-at91/at91_pio.h index 416cabf..069368d 100644 --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-at91/at91_pio.h +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-at91/at91_pio.h @@ -4,6 +4,7 @@ * Copyright (C) 2005 Ivan Kokshaysky * Copyright (C) SAN People [...] ___ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot ___ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
[U-Boot] FW: [PATCH v3] AT91: pio: Add PIO3 features
Hi Albert, It's seems Reinhard is in hibernate state. ;-) Could you please give me a hint how to make AT91 patches move forward? Thanks. BR, Eric -Original Message- From: u-boot-boun...@lists.denx.de [mailto:u-boot-boun...@lists.denx.de] On Behalf Of Hong Xu Sent: Monday, November 21, 2011 10:21 AM To: u-b...@emk-elektronik.de Cc: u-boot@lists.denx.de Subject: Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v3] AT91: pio: Add PIO3 features ping ... BR, Eric On 11/16/2011 06:47 PM, Hong Xu wrote: This patch adds the support for new PIO controller introduced by some AT91 SoCs. New features include * More peripheral multiplexing * Pull-down, Schmitt trigger, Debouncer * More irq trigger mode (may be not interesting in U-Boot) Signed-off-by: Hong Xu hong...@atmel.com --- Change for v3 * CONFIG_CPU_HAS_PIO3 - ATMEL_CPU_HAS_PIO3 PIO3 is a feature of CPU, not a configuration item arch/arm/include/asm/arch-at91/at91_pio.h | 48 ++- drivers/gpio/at91_gpio.c | 130 +++- 2 files changed, 171 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-at91/at91_pio.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-at91/at91_pio.h index 416cabf..069368d 100644 --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-at91/at91_pio.h +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-at91/at91_pio.h @@ -4,6 +4,7 @@ * Copyright (C) 2005 Ivan Kokshaysky * Copyright (C) SAN People [...] ___ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot ___ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH V3] AT91 Fix: return value of get_tbclk
Hi, -Original Message- From: Jens Scharsig [mailto:js_at...@scharsoft.de] Sent: Thursday, September 02, 2010 1:37 AM To: Reinhard Meyer Cc: Xu, Hong; u-boot@lists.denx.de Subject: Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH V3] AT91 Fix: return value of get_tbclk Am 2010-09-01 09:30, schrieb Reinhard Meyer: at91_emac AND macb? macb works for AVR32AP700x and (at least) for AT91SAM9260/9G20/9XE. What is the deal with at91_emac? Is it required for some AT91's because macb does not work there? Does it provide better results than macb? Best Regards Reinhard Hello, I think the separation has historical reasons. For AT91RM and AT91SAM existed separate drivers and separate arch. I remeber in older datascheets the ethernet inteface also marked with MACB. In my opinion, the at91_emac the latest drivers (NET_MULTI api SoC access via c structurs). But I dont know the exact differences are not of single use devices. Please ask Xu, Hong I believe there must be historic reasons. I'm not familiar with AT91RM series. But from the mainline code, $ grep CONFIG_DRIVER_AT91EMAC include/configs/* | wc -l 11 $ grep CONFIG_MACB include/configs/* | wc -l 19 Many boards are dependent on both. And currently AT91SAM always uses CONFIG_MACB, I don't see any change in the near future. BR, Eric ___ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2] AT91: add RTT and GPBR based RTC
Hi Reinhard, -Original Message- From: Reinhard Meyer [mailto:u-b...@emk-elektronik.de] Sent: Wednesday, August 25, 2010 10:23 AM To: Xu, Hong Cc: u-boot@lists.denx.de Subject: Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2] AT91: add RTT and GPBR based RTC Dear Xu, Hong, Some of Atmel's ARM926EJS chips have builtin RTC, for example, SAM9G45 SAM9M10 SAM9RL and new X5 serials. May we take this into account at this stage? Maybe you can help me here: the 9260 and the 9XE-ENG Sample (soldered on my EK) have the GPBRs at 0xfd50. Its sold as a feature (but I think its a bug) that the current Mask of the 9XE has the GPBRs at 0xfd60 (0xfd50 designated reserved now). Is there a simple way to distinguish between both masks? Per the latest datasheet from Atmel's official website, 0xFD60 is GPBR base address for SAM9XE 0xFD50 is GPBR base address for SAM9260. We'd use this for official EK board and forget Eng samples. If you want to distinguish different chip revision, DBGU_CIDR and DBGU_EXID may help. BR, Eric Reinhard ___ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
Re: [U-Boot] Non-experimental U-Boot compilation
Hi, Dear all, I am using the AT91SAM9G20EK kit and want to port Linux on this. Actually Atmel has already done this, see http://www.linux4sam.org the AT91SAM9260ek configuration as it seems the closest. The problem is after building the U-boot with the sources for this board, generating the .bin, loading and a power on reset (POR), there isn't a command prompt exposed (u-boot). After POR, 1 1 2 1 1 2 continuosly prints on the hyperterminal. I read from AT91.com that this is the expected behavior for the demo version. Yes, this is the expected behaviour for the demo package. When you see this, it means you do not boot from the media where you burn your U-Boot into. What is rge procedure to get the prompt ? Are there any separate configuration settings? AT91SAM9G20EK are well supported by both mainline code and Atmel's current binary. ( u-boot 1.3.4, a little bit old) For detailed steps to run U-Boot/Linux on your board, still, goto http://www.linux4sam.org BR, Eric ___ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2] AT91: add RTT and GPBR based RTC
Hi Reinhard, -Original Message- From: u-boot-boun...@lists.denx.de [mailto:u-boot-boun...@lists.denx.de] On Behalf Of Reinhard Meyer Sent: Friday, August 20, 2010 10:00 PM To: u-boot Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2] AT91: add RTT and GPBR based RTC adds kernel compatible RTC handling to u-boot using the RTT and one GPBRegister Signed-off-by: Reinhard Meyer reinhard.me...@emk-elektronik.de --- This patch replaces the wrongly split and outdated patch from 05.07.2010 arch/arm/include/asm/arch-at91/at91_gpbr.h | 45 + arch/arm/include/asm/arch-at91/at91_rtt.h | 36 ++ drivers/rtc/Makefile |1 + drivers/rtc/at91sam9.c | 100 Some of Atmel's ARM926EJS chips have builtin RTC, for example, SAM9G45 SAM9M10 SAM9RL and new X5 serials. May we take this into account at this stage? We can use big #ifdef to add real RTC support in drivers/rtc/at91sam9.c - or - We can rename drivers/rtc/at91sam9.c to , for example, drivers/rtc/at91sam9_rtt.c, and let drivers/rtc/at91sam9.c for the real RTC support. What's your opinion? Thanks. BR, Eric [...] ___ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH V3] AT91 Fix: return value of get_tbclk
Hi Alex, -Original Message- From: Alexander Stein [mailto:alexander.st...@systec-electronic.com] Sent: Monday, August 09, 2010 2:35 PM To: u-boot@lists.denx.de Cc: Jens Scharsig; Xu, Hong Subject: Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH V3] AT91 Fix: return value of get_tbclk Hello, Am Samstag, 7. August 2010, 19:49:42 schrieb Jens Scharsig: * Fix: return value of get_tbclk * this fixes issue with prematurely restart/retry, if BOOT_RETRY_TIMEOUT is used This issue also arises, if you use CONFIG_AUTOBOOT_KEYED friends I tried both BOOT_RETRY_TIMEOUT and CONFIG_AUTOBOOT_KEYED CONFIG_AUTOBOOT_STOP_STR, Both work well on AT91SAM9260EK Which board did you tried? BR, Eric ___ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 1/3] at91: Defined main clock frequency on esd at91 boards
-Original Message- From: Daniel Gorsulowski [mailto:daniel.gorsulow...@esd.eu] Sent: Monday, August 09, 2010 5:17 PM To: u-boot@lists.denx.de Cc: Xu, Hong; Daniel Gorsulowski Subject: [PATCH v3 1/3] at91: Defined main clock frequency on esd at91 boards Autodetection is undesired now Signed-off-by: Daniel Gorsulowski daniel.gorsulow...@esd.eu --- Acked-By: Hong Xu hong...@atmel.com BR, Eric v2: fixed copyright changing error according to Wolfgangs hint v3: nothing changed, just resend to cohere patch series include/configs/meesc.h |3 ++- include/configs/otc570.h |1 + 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) [...] ___ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v5 2/3] at91: Update meesc board to new SoC access
Hi Daniel, -Original Message- From: Daniel Gorsulowski [mailto:daniel.gorsulow...@esd.eu] Sent: Monday, August 09, 2010 5:17 PM To: u-boot@lists.denx.de Cc: Xu, Hong; Daniel Gorsulowski Subject: [PATCH v5 2/3] at91: Update meesc board to new SoC access * convert meesc board to use c stucture SoC access * change gpio access to at91_gpio syntax * moved CONFIG_SYS_HZ below board and cpu defines (purely cosmetic) Signed-off-by: Daniel Gorsulowski daniel.gorsulow...@esd.eu --- Acked-By: Hong Xu hong...@atmel.com BR, Eric v2: fixed copyright changing error according to Wolfgangs hint v3: removed some whitespace, indentation and coding style errors v4: fixed build error (removed jamming parenthesis in pio defines) v5: nothing changed, just resend to cohere patch series board/esd/meesc/meesc.c | 112 -- include/configs/meesc.h | 10 ++--- 2 files changed, 62 insertions(+), 60 deletions(-) [...] ___ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 3/3] at91: Enabeling USB host on meesc board
Hi Daniel, -Original Message- From: Daniel Gorsulowski [mailto:daniel.gorsulow...@esd.eu] Sent: Monday, August 09, 2010 5:17 PM To: u-boot@lists.denx.de Cc: Xu, Hong; Daniel Gorsulowski Subject: [PATCH v3 3/3] at91: Enabeling USB host on meesc board There was an redesign, so USB is available now. Signed-off-by: Daniel Gorsulowski daniel.gorsulow...@esd.eu --- Acked-By: Hong Xu hong...@atmel.com BR, Eric v2: Nothing changed but commit message v3: nothing changed, just resend to cohere patch series board/esd/meesc/meesc.c |6 +- include/configs/meesc.h | 13 - 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) [...] ___ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2a] AT91: add SD/MMC support
Hi Alex, Thanks to Reinhard, his previous work does well on SAM9260 SAM9G20 SAM9XE SAM9RL (I tested all of them). Since he said he'll provide a more fancy one, I'm just on hold :-) For your issue, could you try (If you're using the original EK board from Atmel) Remove R42 - or - In at91_mci_hw_init() @ arch/arm/cpu/arm926ejs/at91/at91sam9260_devices.c , Add a line at91_set_pio_input(AT91_PIO_PORTA, 2, 0); This will let the CLK line of dataflash appear high resistance state. (By default, the CLK line of dataflash and SD slot are connected together by a 0R resistor) BR, Eric -Original Message- From: u-boot-boun...@lists.denx.de [mailto:u-boot-boun...@lists.denx.de] On Behalf Of asc0 Sent: 2010?8?13? 18:19 To: u-boot@lists.denx.de Subject: Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2a] AT91: add SD/MMC support Hello! I have successfully applied your patch on a AT91SAM9G20 cpu and it reads the correct CID CSD info. At the end of initialization the bread function fails with the following error: mmc: bread failed, status = 0040c0e5, card status = 0900 Does someone else received this error or have a hint on this error message? Thanks, Alex -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/-U-Boot---PATCH--AT91SAM9260-9XE%3A-add- support-for-MultiMedia-Card-Interface-%28MCI%29-tp29068839p294 27373.html Sent from the Uboot - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot ___ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] AT91: remove superfluous test in spi driver
Hi Reinhard Meyer, -Original Message- From: u-boot-boun...@lists.denx.de [mailto:u-boot-boun...@lists.denx.de] On Behalf Of Reinhard Meyer (-VC) Sent: 2010?7?30? 17:54 To: u-boot Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH] AT91: remove superfluous test in spi driver Let spi_cs_is_valid() alone make the decision Signed-off-by: Reinhard Meyer i...@emk-elektronik.de Acked-By: Hong Xu hong...@atmel.com BR, Eric drivers/spi/atmel_spi.c |2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/spi/atmel_spi.c b/drivers/spi/atmel_spi.c index 317c0b4..1a650ee 100644 --- a/drivers/spi/atmel_spi.c +++ b/drivers/spi/atmel_spi.c [...] ___ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH-V2 1/3] at91: Defined main clock frequency on esd at91 boards
Hi Daniel, -Original Message- From: Daniel Gorsulowski [mailto:daniel.gorsulow...@esd.eu] Sent: 2010?7?16? 14:22 To: u-boot@lists.denx.de Cc: Xu, Hong; Daniel Gorsulowski Subject: [PATCH-V2 1/3] at91: Defined main clock frequency on esd at91 boards Autodetection is undesired now Signed-off-by: Daniel Gorsulowski daniel.gorsulow...@esd.eu Acked-By: Hong Xu hong...@atmel.com --- v2: fixed copyright changing error according to Wolfgangs hint include/configs/meesc.h |3 ++- include/configs/otc570.h |1 + 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) BR, Eric [...] ___ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH-V2 3/3] at91: Enabeling USB host on meesc board
Hi Daniel, -Original Message- From: Daniel Gorsulowski [mailto:daniel.gorsulow...@esd.eu] Sent: 2010?7?16? 14:23 To: u-boot@lists.denx.de Cc: Xu, Hong; Daniel Gorsulowski Subject: [PATCH-V2 3/3] at91: Enabeling USB host on meesc board There was an redesign, so USB is available now. Signed-off-by: Daniel Gorsulowski daniel.gorsulow...@esd.eu Acked-By: Hong Xu hong...@atmel.com --- v2: Nothing changed but commit message Note: This patch depends on 'at91: Update meesc board to new SoC access' patch! board/esd/meesc/meesc.c |6 +- include/configs/meesc.h | 13 - 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) BR, Eric [...] ___ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH-V2 2/3] at91: Update meesc board to new SoC access
Hi Daniel, -Original Message- From: Daniel Gorsulowski [mailto:daniel.gorsulow...@esd.eu] Sent: 2010?7?16? 14:23 To: u-boot@lists.denx.de Cc: Xu, Hong; Daniel Gorsulowski Subject: [PATCH-V2 2/3] at91: Update meesc board to new SoC access * convert meesc board to use c stucture SoC access * change gpio access to at91_gpio syntax * moved CONFIG_SYS_HZ below board and cpu defines (purely cosmetic) Signed-off-by: Daniel Gorsulowski daniel.gorsulow...@esd.eu --- I checked this patch with linux-2.6.34/scripts/checkpatch.pl and this script reports some indent(tab/space) problems. Could you please fix them. Acked-By: Hong Xu hong...@atmel.com v2: fixed copyright changing error according to Wolfgangs hint board/esd/meesc/meesc.c | 112 -- include/configs/meesc.h |9 ++-- 2 files changed, 62 insertions(+), 59 deletions(-) BR, Eric [...] ___ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
[U-Boot] 答复: [PATCH] AT91SAM9260/9XE: a dd support for MultiMedia Card Interfac e (MCI)
Dear Wolfgang, The reason is I tried to apply the patch on top of 1) master branch of the mainline U-Boot 2) current master of u-boot-at91.git 3) The old master of u-boot-at91.git all of them are failed. Since you said the patch is cleanly against master of mainline U-Boot, I'll rework. Thanks. BR, Eric -Original Message- From: Wolfgang Denk [mailto:w...@denx.de] Sent: 2010-7-5 (星期一) 17:59 To: Xu, Hong Cc: reinhard.me...@emk-elektronik.de; u-boot Subject: Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] AT91SAM9260/9XE: add support for MultiMedia Card Interface (MCI) Dear Eric Xu, In message 4c31770b.1020...@atmel.com you wrote: Could you please rebase your code to master@ git://git.denx.de/u-boot-at91.git ? Why are you requesting this? I do not want a situation that patches need to be submitted agaionst a number of different trees or branches, with the unavoidable result that the majority of readers here on the list cannot test the postings bcause they do not apply against the master repository. Because of that, http://www.denx.de/wiki/U-Boot/Patches states explicitly: Please use the master branch of the mainline U-Boot git repository (git://git.denx.de/u-boot.git) as reference, unless (usually late in a release cycle) there has been an announcement to use the next branch of this repository instead. If your AT91 repository requires a different state, it is your task as custodian to keep it in sync with master, and to resolve any merge conflicts resulting from the remaining differences. Reinhards patch appears to apply cleanly against master, so it should NOT be changed. Thanks. Best regards, Wolfgang Denk -- DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk Detlev Zundel HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: w...@denx.de Real computer scientists despise the idea of actual hardware. Hard- ware has limitations, software doesn't. It's a real shame that Turing machines are so poor at I/O. ___ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] AT91SAM9260/9XE: add support for MultiMedia Card Interface (MCI)
Dear Wolfgang, It seems the root cause of my failure of applying Reinhard's patch is the exchange server settings. Some of the space/tabs are converted/expanded in a wrong way. Thanks for the help and hints from you and Mr.Reinhard. BR, Eric -Original Message- From: Wolfgang Denk [mailto:w...@denx.de] Sent: 2010-7-5 (星期一) 20:46 To: Xu, Hong Cc: reinhard.me...@emk-elektronik.de; u-boot Subject: Re: 答复: [U-Boot] [PATCH] AT91SAM9260/9XE: add support for MultiMedia Card Interface (MCI) Dear Xu, Hong, In message 0f5f73e36031fd46ad3f2e6948f0c0a0205...@frimb01.corp.atmel.com you wrote: The reason is I tried to apply the patch on top of 1) master branch of the mainline U-Boot 2) current master of u-boot-at91.git 3) The old master of u-boot-at91.git all of them are failed. Since you said the patch is cleanly against master of mainline U-Boot, = I'll rework. It applies indeed without problems on top of the current master branch (i. e. on top of commit v2010.06-73-g54841ab) : - git-am -3 -i -u --whitespace=strip ~/Mail/U-Boot/8433 Commit Body is: -- AT91SAM9260/9XE: add support for MultiMedia Card Interface (MCI) This patch adds support for the Atmel MultiMedia Card Interface (MCI) in AT91SAM9260 and AT91SAM9XE SoCs and preserves the original support for the AVR32AP700x SoCs. It patches the original atmel_mci.c driver to remove byte order and toolchain dependencies and makes it a common MCI driver for Atmels AVR32AP7000 and AT91SAM9260 based SoCs. The driver itself is not specific to those SoCs and should work with other Atmel devices having an identical MultiMedia Card Interface (MCI), [...] ___ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
[U-Boot] AT91: Apply for the owner of AT91 custodian tree
Dear Wolfgang, We noticed that the AT91 custodian tree has been left orphaned for a period of time. We're going to take care of AT91 custodian tree and continue bug fixing, patch review, and new board support. Thanks. BR, hong ___ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
