Re: [PATCH] remoteproc: uclass: Clean up a return
On Wed, Jul 26, 2023 at 10:00:33AM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote: > We know that "pa" is non-NULL so it's nicer to just return zero instead > of return !pa. This has no effect on runtime behavior. > > Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter > Reviewed-by: Simon Glass Applied to u-boot/next, thanks! -- Tom signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: [PATCH] remoteproc: uclass: Clean up a return
On Wed, 26 Jul 2023 at 10:50, Dan Carpenter wrote: > > We know that "pa" is non-NULL so it's nicer to just return zero instead > of return !pa. This has no effect on runtime behavior. > > Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter > --- > drivers/remoteproc/rproc-uclass.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > Reviewed-by: Simon Glass
[PATCH] remoteproc: uclass: Clean up a return
We know that "pa" is non-NULL so it's nicer to just return zero instead of return !pa. This has no effect on runtime behavior. Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter --- drivers/remoteproc/rproc-uclass.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/rproc-uclass.c b/drivers/remoteproc/rproc-uclass.c index 50bcc9030e98..19fe4053be81 100644 --- a/drivers/remoteproc/rproc-uclass.c +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/rproc-uclass.c @@ -689,7 +689,7 @@ static int alloc_vring(struct udevice *dev, struct fw_rsc_vdev *rsc, int i) debug("alloc_mem(%#x, %d): %p\n", size, order, pa); vring->da = (uintptr_t)pa; - return !pa; + return 0; } static int handle_vdev(struct udevice *dev, struct fw_rsc_vdev *rsc, -- 2.39.2