Re: [PATCH 0/4] Updates for ClearFog EEPROM

2020-04-16 Thread Joel Johnson

On 2020-04-16 06:38, Stefan Roese wrote:

Hi Baruch,

On 16.04.20 14:22, Baruch Siach wrote:

Hi Stefan,

On Wed, Apr 15 2020, Stefan Roese wrote:

On 19.01.20 08:10, Joel Johnson wrote:


This set of patches applies on top of 
https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/cover/1200324/,
based on testing using the static configuration fallback updates in 
a

related patch series.


Joel Johnson (4):
cmd: sys_eeprom: add missing implicit header
cmd: sys_eeprom reflect I2C dependency in Kconfig
arm: mvebu: clearfog: don't set SPL misc
arm: mvebu: clearfog: fix compile w/o EEPROM

   board/solidrun/clearfog/clearfog.c | 26 
+++---

   cmd/Kconfig|  1 +
   cmd/sys_eeprom.c   |  1 +
   configs/clearfog_defconfig |  1 -
   4 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)


Is it correct to assume, that this patchset is superseded by the
Baruch's work? Can it be dropped?


Which work are you referring to?

The text quoted above specifically mentions dependency on my patch
series adding auto detection based on EEPROM data. So as I understand
these patches are still useful.

Joel, correct me if I am wrong.


If these are still useful, then please rebase and resubmit. I've 
dropped

the patches in the meantime from patchwork as they didn't apply clean
any more.

Thanks,
Stefan


Dropping these are fine, it was indeed superseded.

Baruch, you'd included a reworked version of these into a later version 
of your patchset. As I recall, there were issues at the time with 
disabling EEPROM support which this, and the eventual merged version of 
your series, resolved.


Joel


Re: [PATCH 0/4] Updates for ClearFog EEPROM

2020-04-16 Thread Stefan Roese

Hi Baruch,

On 16.04.20 14:22, Baruch Siach wrote:

Hi Stefan,

On Wed, Apr 15 2020, Stefan Roese wrote:

On 19.01.20 08:10, Joel Johnson wrote:


This set of patches applies on top of 
https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/cover/1200324/,
based on testing using the static configuration fallback updates in a
related patch series.


Joel Johnson (4):
cmd: sys_eeprom: add missing implicit header
cmd: sys_eeprom reflect I2C dependency in Kconfig
arm: mvebu: clearfog: don't set SPL misc
arm: mvebu: clearfog: fix compile w/o EEPROM

   board/solidrun/clearfog/clearfog.c | 26 +++---
   cmd/Kconfig|  1 +
   cmd/sys_eeprom.c   |  1 +
   configs/clearfog_defconfig |  1 -
   4 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)


Is it correct to assume, that this patchset is superseded by the
Baruch's work? Can it be dropped?


Which work are you referring to?

The text quoted above specifically mentions dependency on my patch
series adding auto detection based on EEPROM data. So as I understand
these patches are still useful.

Joel, correct me if I am wrong.


If these are still useful, then please rebase and resubmit. I've dropped
the patches in the meantime from patchwork as they didn't apply clean
any more.

Thanks,
Stefan


Re: [PATCH 0/4] Updates for ClearFog EEPROM

2020-04-16 Thread Baruch Siach
Hi Stefan,

On Wed, Apr 15 2020, Stefan Roese wrote:
> On 19.01.20 08:10, Joel Johnson wrote:
>>
>> This set of patches applies on top of 
>> https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/cover/1200324/,
>> based on testing using the static configuration fallback updates in a
>> related patch series.
>>
>>
>> Joel Johnson (4):
>>cmd: sys_eeprom: add missing implicit header
>>cmd: sys_eeprom reflect I2C dependency in Kconfig
>>arm: mvebu: clearfog: don't set SPL misc
>>arm: mvebu: clearfog: fix compile w/o EEPROM
>>
>>   board/solidrun/clearfog/clearfog.c | 26 +++---
>>   cmd/Kconfig|  1 +
>>   cmd/sys_eeprom.c   |  1 +
>>   configs/clearfog_defconfig |  1 -
>>   4 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
> Is it correct to assume, that this patchset is superseded by the
> Baruch's work? Can it be dropped?

Which work are you referring to?

The text quoted above specifically mentions dependency on my patch
series adding auto detection based on EEPROM data. So as I understand
these patches are still useful.

Joel, correct me if I am wrong.

baruch

--
 http://baruch.siach.name/blog/  ~. .~   Tk Open Systems
=}ooO--U--Ooo{=
   - bar...@tkos.co.il - tel: +972.52.368.4656, http://www.tkos.co.il -


Re: [PATCH 0/4] Updates for ClearFog EEPROM

2020-04-15 Thread Stefan Roese

Hi Joel,

On 19.01.20 08:10, Joel Johnson wrote:


This set of patches applies on top of 
https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/cover/1200324/,
based on testing using the static configuration fallback updates in a
related patch series.


Joel Johnson (4):
   cmd: sys_eeprom: add missing implicit header
   cmd: sys_eeprom reflect I2C dependency in Kconfig
   arm: mvebu: clearfog: don't set SPL misc
   arm: mvebu: clearfog: fix compile w/o EEPROM

  board/solidrun/clearfog/clearfog.c | 26 +++---
  cmd/Kconfig|  1 +
  cmd/sys_eeprom.c   |  1 +
  configs/clearfog_defconfig |  1 -
  4 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)


Is it correct to assume, that this patchset is superseded by the
Baruch's work? Can it be dropped?

Thanks,
Stefan


Re: [PATCH 0/4] Updates for ClearFog EEPROM

2020-01-20 Thread Joel Johnson

On 2020-01-20 05:25, Baruch Siach wrote:

Hi Joel,

On Sun, Jan 19 2020, Joel Johnson wrote:

On 2020-01-19 01:41, Baruch Siach wrote:

On Sun, Jan 19 2020, Joel Johnson wrote:

On 2020-01-19 00:22, Baruch Siach wrote:

On Sun, Jan 19 2020, Joel Johnson wrote:

This set of patches applies on top of
https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/cover/1200324/,
based on testing using the static configuration fallback updates 
in a

related patch series.


Thank you very much.

I'm currently working on an updated series with some significant
changes. These include rename of sys_eeprom to tlv_eeprom; move of 
TLV

parse code to board/solidrun/common/; and support for TLV read in
pre-relocation phase. I'll add your fixes where applicable.

I hope to post v2 in the coming week.

baruch


Sounds good, thanks! I'm also getting ready to shoot out a V2 of my 
static
ClearFog Base support which based on prior review I've rebased on 
your
run-time config series. If it works for you, I'll go ahead and still 
send

that
out for review, modulo your further changes. Are you expecting the
TLV/EEPROM
change updates to be included in time for the current merge window?


I hope to have TLV EEPROM ready for v2020.04.


Hmm, I was hoping to have the static config for ClearFog Base merged 
in the
current merge window, so just to be clear is that what you're 
targeting by

v2020.04 as well?


Yes. Code merged in this merge windows will appear in the next release
which is v2020.04.

I have just posted the updated series with your fixes squashed in,
sometimes in a different form (like the non CMD_TLV_EEPROM build fix).


Sounds great, I'll get my static config series updated against your 
updates runtime detection series, and after a few days post the update, 
pending any other comments on the v2 series.


With my recent rebasing, I believe I made the changes compatible 
between
static and runtime configuration, but it's less important what order 
they're

applied in - i.e. I can rebase again back on master and retain the
alignment. Perhaps it would be possible to merge the static changes 
and then
update the static config entries' help text with a subsequent merge of 
your

runtime work?


I'm not sure what you mean hear.

baruch


Just that if your TLC update wasn't available for the current merge 
window I may want to request merging my static changes first instead of 
the other way around. Since you clarified your schedule and posted the 
updated series, it no longer matters.


Joel


Re: [PATCH 0/4] Updates for ClearFog EEPROM

2020-01-20 Thread Baruch Siach
Hi Joel,

On Sun, Jan 19 2020, Joel Johnson wrote:
> On 2020-01-19 01:41, Baruch Siach wrote:
>> On Sun, Jan 19 2020, Joel Johnson wrote:
>>> On 2020-01-19 00:22, Baruch Siach wrote:
 On Sun, Jan 19 2020, Joel Johnson wrote:
> This set of patches applies on top of
> https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/cover/1200324/,
> based on testing using the static configuration fallback updates in a
> related patch series.

 Thank you very much.

 I'm currently working on an updated series with some significant
 changes. These include rename of sys_eeprom to tlv_eeprom; move of TLV
 parse code to board/solidrun/common/; and support for TLV read in
 pre-relocation phase. I'll add your fixes where applicable.

 I hope to post v2 in the coming week.

 baruch
>>>
>>> Sounds good, thanks! I'm also getting ready to shoot out a V2 of my static
>>> ClearFog Base support which based on prior review I've rebased on your
>>> run-time config series. If it works for you, I'll go ahead and still send
>>> that
>>> out for review, modulo your further changes. Are you expecting the
>>> TLV/EEPROM
>>> change updates to be included in time for the current merge window?
>>
>> I hope to have TLV EEPROM ready for v2020.04.
>
> Hmm, I was hoping to have the static config for ClearFog Base merged in the
> current merge window, so just to be clear is that what you're targeting by
> v2020.04 as well?

Yes. Code merged in this merge windows will appear in the next release
which is v2020.04.

I have just posted the updated series with your fixes squashed in,
sometimes in a different form (like the non CMD_TLV_EEPROM build fix).

> With my recent rebasing, I believe I made the changes compatible between
> static and runtime configuration, but it's less important what order they're
> applied in - i.e. I can rebase again back on master and retain the
> alignment. Perhaps it would be possible to merge the static changes and then
> update the static config entries' help text with a subsequent merge of your
> runtime work?

I'm not sure what you mean hear.

baruch

-- 
 http://baruch.siach.name/blog/  ~. .~   Tk Open Systems
=}ooO--U--Ooo{=
   - bar...@tkos.co.il - tel: +972.52.368.4656, http://www.tkos.co.il -


Re: [PATCH 0/4] Updates for ClearFog EEPROM

2020-01-19 Thread Joel Johnson

On 2020-01-19 01:41, Baruch Siach wrote:

Hi Joel,

On Sun, Jan 19 2020, Joel Johnson wrote:

On 2020-01-19 00:22, Baruch Siach wrote:

On Sun, Jan 19 2020, Joel Johnson wrote:

This set of patches applies on top of
https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/cover/1200324/,
based on testing using the static configuration fallback updates in 
a

related patch series.


Thank you very much.

I'm currently working on an updated series with some significant
changes. These include rename of sys_eeprom to tlv_eeprom; move of 
TLV

parse code to board/solidrun/common/; and support for TLV read in
pre-relocation phase. I'll add your fixes where applicable.

I hope to post v2 in the coming week.

baruch


Sounds good, thanks! I'm also getting ready to shoot out a V2 of my 
static

ClearFog Base support which based on prior review I've rebased on your
run-time config series. If it works for you, I'll go ahead and still 
send that
out for review, modulo your further changes. Are you expecting the 
TLV/EEPROM

change updates to be included in time for the current merge window?


I hope to have TLV EEPROM ready for v2020.04.

baruch


Hmm, I was hoping to have the static config for ClearFog Base merged in 
the current merge window, so just to be clear is that what you're 
targeting by v2020.04 as well?


With my recent rebasing, I believe I made the changes compatible between 
static and runtime configuration, but it's less important what order 
they're applied in - i.e. I can rebase again back on master and retain 
the alignment. Perhaps it would be possible to merge the static changes 
and then update the static config entries' help text with a subsequent 
merge of your runtime work?


Joel


Re: [PATCH 0/4] Updates for ClearFog EEPROM

2020-01-19 Thread Baruch Siach
Hi Joel,

On Sun, Jan 19 2020, Joel Johnson wrote:
> On 2020-01-19 00:22, Baruch Siach wrote:
>> On Sun, Jan 19 2020, Joel Johnson wrote:
>>> This set of patches applies on top of
>>> https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/cover/1200324/,
>>> based on testing using the static configuration fallback updates in a
>>> related patch series.
>>
>> Thank you very much.
>>
>> I'm currently working on an updated series with some significant
>> changes. These include rename of sys_eeprom to tlv_eeprom; move of TLV
>> parse code to board/solidrun/common/; and support for TLV read in
>> pre-relocation phase. I'll add your fixes where applicable.
>>
>> I hope to post v2 in the coming week.
>>
>> baruch
>
> Sounds good, thanks! I'm also getting ready to shoot out a V2 of my static
> ClearFog Base support which based on prior review I've rebased on your
> run-time config series. If it works for you, I'll go ahead and still send that
> out for review, modulo your further changes. Are you expecting the TLV/EEPROM
> change updates to be included in time for the current merge window?

I hope to have TLV EEPROM ready for v2020.04.

baruch

-- 
 http://baruch.siach.name/blog/  ~. .~   Tk Open Systems
=}ooO--U--Ooo{=
   - bar...@tkos.co.il - tel: +972.52.368.4656, http://www.tkos.co.il -


Re: [PATCH 0/4] Updates for ClearFog EEPROM

2020-01-18 Thread Joel Johnson

On 2020-01-19 00:22, Baruch Siach wrote:

Hi Joel,

On Sun, Jan 19 2020, Joel Johnson wrote:
This set of patches applies on top of 
https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/cover/1200324/,

based on testing using the static configuration fallback updates in a
related patch series.


Thank you very much.

I'm currently working on an updated series with some significant
changes. These include rename of sys_eeprom to tlv_eeprom; move of TLV
parse code to board/solidrun/common/; and support for TLV read in
pre-relocation phase. I'll add your fixes where applicable.

I hope to post v2 in the coming week.

baruch


Sounds good, thanks! I'm also getting ready to shoot out a V2 of my 
static ClearFog Base support which based on prior review I've rebased on 
your run-time config series. If it works for you, I'll go ahead and 
still send that out for review, modulo your further changes. Are you 
expecting the TLV/EEPROM change updates to be included in time for the 
current merge window?


Joel


Re: [PATCH 0/4] Updates for ClearFog EEPROM

2020-01-18 Thread Baruch Siach
Hi Joel,

On Sun, Jan 19 2020, Joel Johnson wrote:
> This set of patches applies on top of 
> https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/cover/1200324/,
> based on testing using the static configuration fallback updates in a
> related patch series.

Thank you very much.

I'm currently working on an updated series with some significant
changes. These include rename of sys_eeprom to tlv_eeprom; move of TLV
parse code to board/solidrun/common/; and support for TLV read in
pre-relocation phase. I'll add your fixes where applicable.

I hope to post v2 in the coming week.

baruch

> Joel Johnson (4):
>   cmd: sys_eeprom: add missing implicit header
>   cmd: sys_eeprom reflect I2C dependency in Kconfig
>   arm: mvebu: clearfog: don't set SPL misc
>   arm: mvebu: clearfog: fix compile w/o EEPROM
>
>  board/solidrun/clearfog/clearfog.c | 26 +++---
>  cmd/Kconfig|  1 +
>  cmd/sys_eeprom.c   |  1 +
>  configs/clearfog_defconfig |  1 -
>  4 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)


-- 
 http://baruch.siach.name/blog/  ~. .~   Tk Open Systems
=}ooO--U--Ooo{=
   - bar...@tkos.co.il - tel: +972.52.368.4656, http://www.tkos.co.il -


[PATCH 0/4] Updates for ClearFog EEPROM

2020-01-18 Thread Joel Johnson


This set of patches applies on top of 
https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/cover/1200324/,
based on testing using the static configuration fallback updates in a
related patch series.


Joel Johnson (4):
  cmd: sys_eeprom: add missing implicit header
  cmd: sys_eeprom reflect I2C dependency in Kconfig
  arm: mvebu: clearfog: don't set SPL misc
  arm: mvebu: clearfog: fix compile w/o EEPROM

 board/solidrun/clearfog/clearfog.c | 26 +++---
 cmd/Kconfig|  1 +
 cmd/sys_eeprom.c   |  1 +
 configs/clearfog_defconfig |  1 -
 4 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

-- 
2.20.1