Re: [PATCH 17/27] ppc: Remove T1023RBD boards and T1024RDB_SECURE_BOOT
On 7/15/21 11:06 PM, Tom Rini wrote: On Thu, Jul 15, 2021 at 10:24:09AM +0200, gianluca wrote: Hello list! I know this mail will be OT, but I am worried about what will happen to a new project using the PowerPC T2080,e6500 64-bit PPC on this web site: https://www.powerpc-notebook.org I suspect the same architecture will be move outside the official Linux release when the same device-model will not match the kernel. And this will be a pity for all people who are believe on architectures and the power of opensource other than x86 and arm processors. So, this project will be a no-go or dead project before it will be launched. Are my worries overkill? I hope so. The platform can come back if someone is going to be actively maintaining the support. No one had been doing that, so I'm not sure what hidden breakage existed underneath the technical debt. Thanks a lot Tom. I will report this to the open progress ppc platform group. I think they will do whatever it takes to maintain this platform as soon as possible. Regards, -- Eurek s.r.l. | Electronic Engineering| http://www.eurek.it via Celletta 8/B, 40026 Imola, Italy | Phone: +39-(0)542-609120 p.iva 00690621206 - c.f. 04020030377 | Fax: +39-(0)542-609212
Re: [PATCH 17/27] ppc: Remove T1023RBD boards and T1024RDB_SECURE_BOOT
On Thu, Jul 15, 2021 at 10:24:09AM +0200, gianluca wrote: > Hello list! > I know this mail will be OT, but I am worried about what will happen to a > new project using the PowerPC T2080,e6500 64-bit PPC on this web site: > > https://www.powerpc-notebook.org > > I suspect the same architecture will be move outside the official Linux > release when the same device-model will not match the kernel. And this will > be a pity for all people who are believe on architectures and the power of > opensource other than x86 and arm processors. > > So, this project will be a no-go or dead project before it will be launched. > > Are my worries overkill? > > I hope so. The platform can come back if someone is going to be actively maintaining the support. No one had been doing that, so I'm not sure what hidden breakage existed underneath the technical debt. -- Tom signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: [PATCH 17/27] ppc: Remove T1023RBD boards and T1024RDB_SECURE_BOOT
Hello list! I know this mail will be OT, but I am worried about what will happen to a new project using the PowerPC T2080,e6500 64-bit PPC on this web site: https://www.powerpc-notebook.org I suspect the same architecture will be move outside the official Linux release when the same device-model will not match the kernel. And this will be a pity for all people who are believe on architectures and the power of opensource other than x86 and arm processors. So, this project will be a no-go or dead project before it will be launched. Are my worries overkill? I hope so. On 7/8/21 4:52 AM, Tom Rini wrote: On Fri, May 14, 2021 at 09:34:22PM -0400, Tom Rini wrote: These boards have not been converted to CONFIG_DM_PCI by the deadline and is also missing conversion to CONFIG_DM. Remove them. As this is the only ARCH_T1023 platform left, remove that support as well. Cc: Priyanka Jain Signed-off-by: Tom Rini Applied to u-boot/master, thanks! -- Eurek s.r.l. | Electronic Engineering| http://www.eurek.it via Celletta 8/B, 40026 Imola, Italy | Phone: +39-(0)542-609120 p.iva 00690621206 - c.f. 04020030377 | Fax: +39-(0)542-609212
Re: [PATCH 17/27] ppc: Remove T1023RBD boards and T1024RDB_SECURE_BOOT
On Fri, May 14, 2021 at 09:34:22PM -0400, Tom Rini wrote: > These boards have not been converted to CONFIG_DM_PCI by the deadline > and is also missing conversion to CONFIG_DM. Remove them. As this is > the only ARCH_T1023 platform left, remove that support as well. > > Cc: Priyanka Jain > Signed-off-by: Tom Rini Applied to u-boot/master, thanks! -- Tom signature.asc Description: PGP signature
[PATCH 17/27] ppc: Remove T1023RBD boards and T1024RDB_SECURE_BOOT
These boards have not been converted to CONFIG_DM_PCI by the deadline and is also missing conversion to CONFIG_DM. Remove them. As this is the only ARCH_T1023 platform left, remove that support as well. Cc: Priyanka Jain Signed-off-by: Tom Rini --- arch/powerpc/cpu/mpc85xx/Kconfig | 37 +- arch/powerpc/cpu/mpc85xx/Makefile | 2 - arch/powerpc/cpu/mpc85xx/speed.c | 4 +- arch/powerpc/include/asm/config_mpc85xx.h | 2 +- arch/powerpc/include/asm/fsl_secure_boot.h | 1 - arch/powerpc/include/asm/immap_85xx.h | 4 +- board/freescale/t102xrdb/MAINTAINERS | 5 -- configs/T1023RDB_NAND_defconfig| 80 -- configs/T1023RDB_SDCARD_defconfig | 77 - configs/T1023RDB_SPIFLASH_defconfig| 79 - configs/T1023RDB_defconfig | 64 - configs/T1024RDB_SECURE_BOOT_defconfig | 70 --- drivers/net/Kconfig| 1 - drivers/net/fm/Makefile| 1 - 14 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 421 deletions(-) delete mode 100644 configs/T1023RDB_NAND_defconfig delete mode 100644 configs/T1023RDB_SDCARD_defconfig delete mode 100644 configs/T1023RDB_SPIFLASH_defconfig delete mode 100644 configs/T1023RDB_defconfig delete mode 100644 configs/T1024RDB_SECURE_BOOT_defconfig diff --git a/arch/powerpc/cpu/mpc85xx/Kconfig b/arch/powerpc/cpu/mpc85xx/Kconfig index 891db4e37810..0a2921ddb323 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/cpu/mpc85xx/Kconfig +++ b/arch/powerpc/cpu/mpc85xx/Kconfig @@ -113,16 +113,6 @@ config TARGET_QEMU_PPCE500 select ARCH_QEMU_E500 select PHYS_64BIT -config TARGET_T1023RDB - bool "Support T1023RDB" - select ARCH_T1023 - select BOARD_LATE_INIT if CHAIN_OF_TRUST - select SUPPORT_SPL - select PHYS_64BIT - select FSL_DDR_INTERACTIVE - imply CMD_EEPROM - imply PANIC_HANG - config TARGET_T1024RDB bool "Support T1024RDB" select ARCH_T1024 @@ -692,27 +682,6 @@ config ARCH_P5040 config ARCH_QEMU_E500 bool -config ARCH_T1023 - bool - select E500MC - select FSL_LAW - select SYS_FSL_DDR_VER_50 - select SYS_FSL_ERRATUM_A008378 - select SYS_FSL_ERRATUM_A008109 - select SYS_FSL_ERRATUM_A009663 - select SYS_FSL_ERRATUM_A009942 - select SYS_FSL_ERRATUM_ESDHC111 - select SYS_FSL_HAS_DDR3 - select SYS_FSL_HAS_DDR4 - select SYS_FSL_HAS_SEC - select SYS_FSL_QORIQ_CHASSIS2 - select SYS_FSL_SEC_BE - select SYS_FSL_SEC_COMPAT_5 - select FSL_IFC - imply CMD_EEPROM - imply CMD_NAND - imply CMD_REGINFO - config ARCH_T1024 bool select E500MC @@ -916,7 +885,6 @@ config MAX_CPUS ARCH_P1024 || \ ARCH_P1025 || \ ARCH_P2020 || \ -ARCH_T1023 || \ ARCH_T1024 default 1 help @@ -952,7 +920,6 @@ config SYS_CCSRBAR_DEFAULT ARCH_P3041 || \ ARCH_P4080 || \ ARCH_P5040 || \ - ARCH_T1023 || \ ARCH_T1024 || \ ARCH_T1040 || \ ARCH_T1042 || \ @@ -1144,8 +,7 @@ config SYS_FSL_NUM_LAWS ARCH_T2080 || \ ARCH_T4160 || \ ARCH_T4240 - default 16 if ARCH_T1023 || \ - ARCH_T1024 || \ + default 16 if ARCH_T1024 || \ ARCH_T1040 || \ ARCH_T1042 default 12 if ARCH_BSC9131|| \ @@ -1224,7 +1190,6 @@ config SYS_FSL_IFC_CLK_DIV default 2 ifARCH_B4420 || \ ARCH_B4860 || \ ARCH_T1024 || \ - ARCH_T1023 || \ ARCH_T1040 || \ ARCH_T1042 || \ ARCH_T4160 || \ diff --git a/arch/powerpc/cpu/mpc85xx/Makefile b/arch/powerpc/cpu/mpc85xx/Makefile index b9d87ddb655e..4d9a07b5d9c3 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/cpu/mpc85xx/Makefile +++ b/arch/powerpc/cpu/mpc85xx/Makefile @@ -47,7 +47,6 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_ARCH_B4420) += b4860_ids.o obj-$(CONFIG_ARCH_B4860) += b4860_ids.o obj-$(CONFIG_ARCH_T1040) += t1040_ids.o obj-$(CONFIG_ARCH_T1042) += t1040_ids.o -obj-$(CONFIG_ARCH_T1023) += t1024_ids.o obj-$(CONFIG_ARCH_T1024) += t1024_ids.o obj-$(CONFIG_ARCH_T2080) += t2080_ids.o @@ -83,7 +82,6 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_ARCH_B4860) += b4860_serdes.o obj-$(CONFIG_ARCH_BSC9132) += bsc9132_serdes.o obj-$(CONFIG_ARCH_T1040) += t1040_serdes.o obj-$(CONFIG_ARCH_T1042) += t1040_serdes.o -obj-$(CONFIG_ARCH_T1023)
