Re: [PATCH v2 06/10] rtc: add rtc command

2020-06-02 Thread Simon Glass
Hi Rasmus,

On Tue, 2 Jun 2020 at 08:36, Rasmus Villemoes
 wrote:
>
> On 02/06/2020 15.22, Simon Glass wrote:
> > Hi Rasmus,
> >
> > On Tue, 2 Jun 2020 at 03:13, Rasmus Villemoes
> >  wrote:
> >>
> >> On 31/05/2020 16.07, Simon Glass wrote:
> >>> Hi Rasmus,
> >>>
> >>> On Tue, 19 May 2020 at 16:01, Rasmus Villemoes
> >>>  wrote:
> 
> >
> > [..]
> >
>  +int do_rtc(cmd_tbl_t *cmdtp, int flag, int argc, char * const argv[])
>  +{
>  +   static int curr_rtc = 0;
>  +   struct udevice *dev;
>  +   int ret, idx;
>  +
>  +   if (argc < 2)
>  +   return CMD_RET_USAGE;
>  +
>  +   argc--;
>  +   argv++;
>  +
>  +   if (!strcmp(argv[0], "list")) {
> >>>
> >>> It is comment in U-Boot to just check the letters that are needed. So
> >>> here you could do (*argv[0] == 'l')
> >>
> >> Yes, and I consider that an anti-pattern. It makes it impossible to
> >> later introduce another (sub)command which starts with a
> >> previously-unique prefix. Now, if that "just type a unique prefix"
> >> wasn't official, so scripts were always supposed to use the full names,
> >> it wouldn't be that big a problem (scripts written for later versions of
> >> U-Boot, or U-Boots configured with more (sub)commands, could still fail
> >> silently if used on an earlier U-Boot or one with fewer (sub)commands
> >> instead of producing a "usage" error message), but
> >> https://www.denx.de/wiki/view/DULG/UBootCommandLineInterface explicitly
> >> mentions that as a feature (and says h can be used for help, which it
> >> can't when the hash command is built in, perfectly exemplifying what I'm
> >> talking about).
> >
> > Hah funny. Using an abbreviation is only possible if no other command
> > starts with the same leters.
> >
> > It is certainly very risky to use abbreviations in scripts. I would
> > not recommend it. Abbreviations are for interactive use. If you have
> > auto-completion on you can use tab.
>
> Exactly, so the ability to use the abbreviated form doesn't really buy
> anything - it's risky in scripts, and interactively, it merely saves a
> tab keystroke (and that's all lost in the cognitive overhead of having
> to remember just what abbrev is enough).

Not quite:
- tab is an extra, unnecessary keystroke
- many comments don't implement auto-complete (e.g. try 'gpio i'
- auto-complete adds to code size
- fully checking the string adds to code size

>
> > But here we are talking about a sub-command, which is a bit more
> > controlled, in that it doesn't depend on what other commands the user
> > enables.
>
> True, but the same point applies; if I allowed "rtc w", one couldn't
> easily later add an "rtc wobble" subcommand (ok, my imagination is
> lacking, but you get the idea).
>
> > Anyway, it's up to you what you want to do here.
>
> In that case I'll keep checking for the full name of subcommands.

OK.

Regards,
Simon


Re: [PATCH v2 06/10] rtc: add rtc command

2020-06-02 Thread Rasmus Villemoes
On 02/06/2020 15.22, Simon Glass wrote:
> Hi Rasmus,
> 
> On Tue, 2 Jun 2020 at 03:13, Rasmus Villemoes
>  wrote:
>>
>> On 31/05/2020 16.07, Simon Glass wrote:
>>> Hi Rasmus,
>>>
>>> On Tue, 19 May 2020 at 16:01, Rasmus Villemoes
>>>  wrote:

> 
> [..]
> 
 +int do_rtc(cmd_tbl_t *cmdtp, int flag, int argc, char * const argv[])
 +{
 +   static int curr_rtc = 0;
 +   struct udevice *dev;
 +   int ret, idx;
 +
 +   if (argc < 2)
 +   return CMD_RET_USAGE;
 +
 +   argc--;
 +   argv++;
 +
 +   if (!strcmp(argv[0], "list")) {
>>>
>>> It is comment in U-Boot to just check the letters that are needed. So
>>> here you could do (*argv[0] == 'l')
>>
>> Yes, and I consider that an anti-pattern. It makes it impossible to
>> later introduce another (sub)command which starts with a
>> previously-unique prefix. Now, if that "just type a unique prefix"
>> wasn't official, so scripts were always supposed to use the full names,
>> it wouldn't be that big a problem (scripts written for later versions of
>> U-Boot, or U-Boots configured with more (sub)commands, could still fail
>> silently if used on an earlier U-Boot or one with fewer (sub)commands
>> instead of producing a "usage" error message), but
>> https://www.denx.de/wiki/view/DULG/UBootCommandLineInterface explicitly
>> mentions that as a feature (and says h can be used for help, which it
>> can't when the hash command is built in, perfectly exemplifying what I'm
>> talking about).
> 
> Hah funny. Using an abbreviation is only possible if no other command
> starts with the same leters.
> 
> It is certainly very risky to use abbreviations in scripts. I would
> not recommend it. Abbreviations are for interactive use. If you have
> auto-completion on you can use tab.

Exactly, so the ability to use the abbreviated form doesn't really buy
anything - it's risky in scripts, and interactively, it merely saves a
tab keystroke (and that's all lost in the cognitive overhead of having
to remember just what abbrev is enough).

> But here we are talking about a sub-command, which is a bit more
> controlled, in that it doesn't depend on what other commands the user
> enables.

True, but the same point applies; if I allowed "rtc w", one couldn't
easily later add an "rtc wobble" subcommand (ok, my imagination is
lacking, but you get the idea).

> Anyway, it's up to you what you want to do here.

In that case I'll keep checking for the full name of subcommands.

Thanks,
Rasmus


Re: [PATCH v2 06/10] rtc: add rtc command

2020-06-02 Thread Simon Glass
Hi Rasmus,

On Tue, 2 Jun 2020 at 03:13, Rasmus Villemoes
 wrote:
>
> On 31/05/2020 16.07, Simon Glass wrote:
> > Hi Rasmus,
> >
> > On Tue, 19 May 2020 at 16:01, Rasmus Villemoes
> >  wrote:
> >>

[..]

> >> +int do_rtc(cmd_tbl_t *cmdtp, int flag, int argc, char * const argv[])
> >> +{
> >> +   static int curr_rtc = 0;
> >> +   struct udevice *dev;
> >> +   int ret, idx;
> >> +
> >> +   if (argc < 2)
> >> +   return CMD_RET_USAGE;
> >> +
> >> +   argc--;
> >> +   argv++;
> >> +
> >> +   if (!strcmp(argv[0], "list")) {
> >
> > It is comment in U-Boot to just check the letters that are needed. So
> > here you could do (*argv[0] == 'l')
>
> Yes, and I consider that an anti-pattern. It makes it impossible to
> later introduce another (sub)command which starts with a
> previously-unique prefix. Now, if that "just type a unique prefix"
> wasn't official, so scripts were always supposed to use the full names,
> it wouldn't be that big a problem (scripts written for later versions of
> U-Boot, or U-Boots configured with more (sub)commands, could still fail
> silently if used on an earlier U-Boot or one with fewer (sub)commands
> instead of producing a "usage" error message), but
> https://www.denx.de/wiki/view/DULG/UBootCommandLineInterface explicitly
> mentions that as a feature (and says h can be used for help, which it
> can't when the hash command is built in, perfectly exemplifying what I'm
> talking about).

Hah funny. Using an abbreviation is only possible if no other command
starts with the same leters.

It is certainly very risky to use abbreviations in scripts. I would
not recommend it. Abbreviations are for interactive use. If you have
auto-completion on you can use tab.

But here we are talking about a sub-command, which is a bit more
controlled, in that it doesn't depend on what other commands the user
enables.

Anyway, it's up to you what you want to do here.

Regards,
Simon


Re: [PATCH v2 06/10] rtc: add rtc command

2020-06-02 Thread Rasmus Villemoes
On 31/05/2020 16.07, Simon Glass wrote:
> Hi Rasmus,
> 
> On Tue, 19 May 2020 at 16:01, Rasmus Villemoes
>  wrote:
>>

>> +static int do_rtc_read(struct udevice *dev, int argc, char * const argv[])
>> +{
>> +   u8 buf[MAX_RTC_BYTES];
>> +   int reg, len, ret;
>> +   u8 *addr;
>> +
>> +   if (argc < 2 || argc > 3)
>> +   return CMD_RET_USAGE;
>> +
>> +   reg = simple_strtoul(argv[0], NULL, 0);
> 
> I think these should be hex (i.e. 16), since that is the norm in U-Boot.

OK.

>> +   len = simple_strtoul(argv[1], NULL, 0);
>> +   if (argc == 3) {
>> +   addr = map_sysmem(simple_strtoul(argv[2], NULL, 16), len);
>> +   } else {
>> +   if (len > sizeof(buf)) {
>> +   printf("can read at most %d registers at a time\n", 
>> MAX_RTC_BYTES);
> 
> It would be better to loop like print_buffer() does.

Both read and write have been rewritten to avoid that arbitrary limit.

>> +
>> +   if (argc == 2) {
>> +   while (len--)
>> +   printf("%d: 0x%02x\n", reg++, *addr++);
> 
> Perhaps use print_buffer()?

Done.

>> +   const char *s = argv[1];
>> +
>> +   /* Convert hexstring, bail out if too long. */
>> +   addr = buf;
>> +   len = strlen(s);
>> +   if (len > 2*MAX_RTC_BYTES) {
> 
> Spaces around *
> 
>> +   printf("hex string too long, can write at most %d 
>> bytes\n", MAX_RTC_BYTES);
> 
> Please can you try checkpatch or patman? This lines seems too long

The rewrite to avoid the 32 byte limit made me handle the "argc==3" case
separately (it wasn't worth the complexity trying to stick to just one
rtc_{read,write} call, which also automatically dealt with this one.

>> +
>> +int do_rtc(cmd_tbl_t *cmdtp, int flag, int argc, char * const argv[])
>> +{
>> +   static int curr_rtc = 0;
>> +   struct udevice *dev;
>> +   int ret, idx;
>> +
>> +   if (argc < 2)
>> +   return CMD_RET_USAGE;
>> +
>> +   argc--;
>> +   argv++;
>> +
>> +   if (!strcmp(argv[0], "list")) {
> 
> It is comment in U-Boot to just check the letters that are needed. So
> here you could do (*argv[0] == 'l')

Yes, and I consider that an anti-pattern. It makes it impossible to
later introduce another (sub)command which starts with a
previously-unique prefix. Now, if that "just type a unique prefix"
wasn't official, so scripts were always supposed to use the full names,
it wouldn't be that big a problem (scripts written for later versions of
U-Boot, or U-Boots configured with more (sub)commands, could still fail
silently if used on an earlier U-Boot or one with fewer (sub)commands
instead of producing a "usage" error message), but
https://www.denx.de/wiki/view/DULG/UBootCommandLineInterface explicitly
mentions that as a feature (and says h can be used for help, which it
can't when the hash command is built in, perfectly exemplifying what I'm
talking about).

Thanks,
Rasmus


Re: [PATCH v2 06/10] rtc: add rtc command

2020-05-31 Thread Simon Glass
Hi Rasmus,

On Tue, 19 May 2020 at 16:01, Rasmus Villemoes
 wrote:
>
> Mostly as an aid for debugging RTC drivers, provide a command that can
> be used to read/write arbitrary registers (assuming the driver
> provides the read/write methods or their single-register-at-a-time
> variants).
>
> Signed-off-by: Rasmus Villemoes 
> ---
>  cmd/Kconfig  |   6 ++
>  cmd/Makefile |   1 +
>  cmd/rtc.c| 159 +++
>  3 files changed, 166 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 cmd/rtc.c
>
> diff --git a/cmd/Kconfig b/cmd/Kconfig
> index f9be1988f6..7eea25facd 100644
> --- a/cmd/Kconfig
> +++ b/cmd/Kconfig
> @@ -1715,6 +1715,12 @@ config CMD_DATE
>   Enable the 'date' command for getting/setting the time/date in RTC
>   devices.
>
> +config CMD_RTC
> +   bool "rtc"
> +   depends on DM_RTC
> +   help
> + Enable the 'rtc' command for low-level access to RTC devices.
> +
>  config CMD_TIME
> bool "time"
> help
> diff --git a/cmd/Makefile b/cmd/Makefile
> index 974ad48b0a..c7992113e4 100644
> --- a/cmd/Makefile
> +++ b/cmd/Makefile
> @@ -120,6 +120,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_CMD_REISER) += reiser.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_CMD_REMOTEPROC) += remoteproc.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_CMD_RNG) += rng.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_CMD_ROCKUSB) += rockusb.o
> +obj-$(CONFIG_CMD_RTC) += rtc.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_SANDBOX) += host.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_CMD_SATA) += sata.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_CMD_NVME) += nvme.o
> diff --git a/cmd/rtc.c b/cmd/rtc.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 00..e26b7ca18f
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/cmd/rtc.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,159 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0+
> +
> +#include 
> +#include 
> +#include 
> +#include 
> +#include 
> +#include 
> +#include 
> +
> +#define MAX_RTC_BYTES 32
> +
> +static int do_rtc_read(struct udevice *dev, int argc, char * const argv[])
> +{
> +   u8 buf[MAX_RTC_BYTES];
> +   int reg, len, ret;
> +   u8 *addr;
> +
> +   if (argc < 2 || argc > 3)
> +   return CMD_RET_USAGE;
> +
> +   reg = simple_strtoul(argv[0], NULL, 0);

I think these should be hex (i.e. 16), since that is the norm in U-Boot.

> +   len = simple_strtoul(argv[1], NULL, 0);
> +   if (argc == 3) {
> +   addr = map_sysmem(simple_strtoul(argv[2], NULL, 16), len);
> +   } else {
> +   if (len > sizeof(buf)) {
> +   printf("can read at most %d registers at a time\n", 
> MAX_RTC_BYTES);

It would be better to loop like print_buffer() does.

> +   return CMD_RET_FAILURE;
> +   }
> +   addr = buf;
> +   }
> +
> +   ret = rtc_read(dev, reg, addr, len);
> +   if (ret) {
> +   printf("rtc_read() failed: %d\n", ret);
> +   ret = CMD_RET_FAILURE;
> +   goto out;
> +   } else {
> +   ret = CMD_RET_SUCCESS;
> +   }
> +
> +   if (argc == 2) {
> +   while (len--)
> +   printf("%d: 0x%02x\n", reg++, *addr++);

Perhaps use print_buffer()?

> +   }
> +out:
> +   if (argc == 3)
> +   unmap_sysmem(addr);
> +   return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static int do_rtc_write(struct udevice *dev, int argc, char * const argv[])
> +{
> +   u8 buf[MAX_RTC_BYTES];
> +   u8 *addr;
> +   int reg, len, ret;
> +
> +   if (argc < 2 || argc > 3)
> +   return CMD_RET_USAGE;
> +
> +   reg = simple_strtoul(argv[0], NULL, 0);
> +
> +   if (argc == 3) {
> +   len = simple_strtoul(argv[1], NULL, 0);
> +   addr = map_sysmem(simple_strtoul(argv[2], NULL, 16), len);
> +   } else {
> +   const char *s = argv[1];
> +
> +   /* Convert hexstring, bail out if too long. */
> +   addr = buf;
> +   len = strlen(s);
> +   if (len > 2*MAX_RTC_BYTES) {

Spaces around *

> +   printf("hex string too long, can write at most %d 
> bytes\n", MAX_RTC_BYTES);

Please can you try checkpatch or patman? This lines seems too long

> +   return CMD_RET_FAILURE;
> +   }
> +   len /= 2;
> +   if (hex2bin(addr, s, len)) {
> +   printf("invalid hex string\n");
> +   return CMD_RET_FAILURE;
> +   }
> +   }
> +
> +   ret = rtc_write(dev, reg, addr, len);
> +   if (ret) {
> +   printf("rtc_write() failed: %d\n", ret);
> +   ret = CMD_RET_FAILURE;
> +   } else {
> +   ret = CMD_RET_SUCCESS;
> +   }
> +
> +   if (argc == 3)
> +   unmap_sysmem(addr);
> +   return ret;
> +}
> +
> +int do_rtc(cmd_tbl_t *cmdtp, int flag, int argc, char * const argv[])
> +{
> +   static int curr_rtc = 0;
> +   struct udevice *dev;
> +   int ret, idx;
> +
> +   if (argc < 2)
> +   return CMD_RET_USAGE;
> +
> +   argc--;
> +   argv++;
> +
> +   if 

[PATCH v2 06/10] rtc: add rtc command

2020-05-19 Thread Rasmus Villemoes
Mostly as an aid for debugging RTC drivers, provide a command that can
be used to read/write arbitrary registers (assuming the driver
provides the read/write methods or their single-register-at-a-time
variants).

Signed-off-by: Rasmus Villemoes 
---
 cmd/Kconfig  |   6 ++
 cmd/Makefile |   1 +
 cmd/rtc.c| 159 +++
 3 files changed, 166 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 cmd/rtc.c

diff --git a/cmd/Kconfig b/cmd/Kconfig
index f9be1988f6..7eea25facd 100644
--- a/cmd/Kconfig
+++ b/cmd/Kconfig
@@ -1715,6 +1715,12 @@ config CMD_DATE
  Enable the 'date' command for getting/setting the time/date in RTC
  devices.
 
+config CMD_RTC
+   bool "rtc"
+   depends on DM_RTC
+   help
+ Enable the 'rtc' command for low-level access to RTC devices.
+
 config CMD_TIME
bool "time"
help
diff --git a/cmd/Makefile b/cmd/Makefile
index 974ad48b0a..c7992113e4 100644
--- a/cmd/Makefile
+++ b/cmd/Makefile
@@ -120,6 +120,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_CMD_REISER) += reiser.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_CMD_REMOTEPROC) += remoteproc.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_CMD_RNG) += rng.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_CMD_ROCKUSB) += rockusb.o
+obj-$(CONFIG_CMD_RTC) += rtc.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_SANDBOX) += host.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_CMD_SATA) += sata.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_CMD_NVME) += nvme.o
diff --git a/cmd/rtc.c b/cmd/rtc.c
new file mode 100644
index 00..e26b7ca18f
--- /dev/null
+++ b/cmd/rtc.c
@@ -0,0 +1,159 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0+
+
+#include 
+#include 
+#include 
+#include 
+#include 
+#include 
+#include 
+
+#define MAX_RTC_BYTES 32
+
+static int do_rtc_read(struct udevice *dev, int argc, char * const argv[])
+{
+   u8 buf[MAX_RTC_BYTES];
+   int reg, len, ret;
+   u8 *addr;
+
+   if (argc < 2 || argc > 3)
+   return CMD_RET_USAGE;
+
+   reg = simple_strtoul(argv[0], NULL, 0);
+   len = simple_strtoul(argv[1], NULL, 0);
+   if (argc == 3) {
+   addr = map_sysmem(simple_strtoul(argv[2], NULL, 16), len);
+   } else {
+   if (len > sizeof(buf)) {
+   printf("can read at most %d registers at a time\n", 
MAX_RTC_BYTES);
+   return CMD_RET_FAILURE;
+   }
+   addr = buf;
+   }
+
+   ret = rtc_read(dev, reg, addr, len);
+   if (ret) {
+   printf("rtc_read() failed: %d\n", ret);
+   ret = CMD_RET_FAILURE;
+   goto out;
+   } else {
+   ret = CMD_RET_SUCCESS;
+   }
+
+   if (argc == 2) {
+   while (len--)
+   printf("%d: 0x%02x\n", reg++, *addr++);
+   }
+out:
+   if (argc == 3)
+   unmap_sysmem(addr);
+   return ret;
+}
+
+static int do_rtc_write(struct udevice *dev, int argc, char * const argv[])
+{
+   u8 buf[MAX_RTC_BYTES];
+   u8 *addr;
+   int reg, len, ret;
+
+   if (argc < 2 || argc > 3)
+   return CMD_RET_USAGE;
+
+   reg = simple_strtoul(argv[0], NULL, 0);
+
+   if (argc == 3) {
+   len = simple_strtoul(argv[1], NULL, 0);
+   addr = map_sysmem(simple_strtoul(argv[2], NULL, 16), len);
+   } else {
+   const char *s = argv[1];
+
+   /* Convert hexstring, bail out if too long. */
+   addr = buf;
+   len = strlen(s);
+   if (len > 2*MAX_RTC_BYTES) {
+   printf("hex string too long, can write at most %d 
bytes\n", MAX_RTC_BYTES);
+   return CMD_RET_FAILURE;
+   }
+   len /= 2;
+   if (hex2bin(addr, s, len)) {
+   printf("invalid hex string\n");
+   return CMD_RET_FAILURE;
+   }
+   }
+
+   ret = rtc_write(dev, reg, addr, len);
+   if (ret) {
+   printf("rtc_write() failed: %d\n", ret);
+   ret = CMD_RET_FAILURE;
+   } else {
+   ret = CMD_RET_SUCCESS;
+   }
+
+   if (argc == 3)
+   unmap_sysmem(addr);
+   return ret;
+}
+
+int do_rtc(cmd_tbl_t *cmdtp, int flag, int argc, char * const argv[])
+{
+   static int curr_rtc = 0;
+   struct udevice *dev;
+   int ret, idx;
+
+   if (argc < 2)
+   return CMD_RET_USAGE;
+
+   argc--;
+   argv++;
+
+   if (!strcmp(argv[0], "list")) {
+   struct uclass *uc;
+   idx = 0;
+
+   uclass_id_foreach_dev(UCLASS_RTC, dev, uc) {
+   printf("RTC #%d - %s\n", idx++, dev->name);
+   }
+   if (!idx) {
+   printf("*** no RTC devices available ***\n");
+   return CMD_RET_FAILURE;
+   }
+   return CMD_RET_SUCCESS;
+   }
+
+   idx = curr_rtc;
+   if (!strcmp(argv[0], "dev") && argc >= 2)
+   idx = simple_strtoul(argv[1], NULL, 10);
+
+   ret = uclass_get_device(UCLASS_RTC, idx, );
+