We should be returning the rate that we set the clock to, drivers like
MMC rely on this. So fix it.

Reviewed-by: Neil Armstrong <neil.armstr...@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Sumit Garg <sumit.g...@linaro.org>
Tested-by: Sumit Garg <sumit.g...@linaro.org> #qcs404
Signed-off-by: Caleb Connolly <caleb.conno...@linaro.org>
---
 drivers/clk/qcom/clock-qcs404.c | 25 +++++++++++++------------
 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/clk/qcom/clock-qcs404.c b/drivers/clk/qcom/clock-qcs404.c
index f5b352803927..958312b88842 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/qcom/clock-qcs404.c
+++ b/drivers/clk/qcom/clock-qcs404.c
@@ -192,26 +192,20 @@ static ulong qcs404_clk_set_rate(struct clk *clk, ulong 
rate)
        struct msm_clk_priv *priv = dev_get_priv(clk->dev);
 
        switch (clk->id) {
        case GCC_BLSP1_UART2_APPS_CLK:
-               /* UART: 115200 */
+               /* UART: 1843200Hz for a fixed 115200 baudrate (19200000 * 
(12/125)) */
                clk_rcg_set_rate_mnd(priv->base, &uart2_regs, 0, 12, 125,
                                     CFG_CLK_SRC_CXO, 16);
                clk_enable_cbc(priv->base + BLSP1_UART2_APPS_CBCR);
-               break;
-       case GCC_BLSP1_AHB_CLK:
-               clk_enable_vote_clk(priv->base, &gcc_blsp1_ahb_clk);
-               break;
+               return 1843200;
        case GCC_SDCC1_APPS_CLK:
                /* SDCC1: 200MHz */
                clk_rcg_set_rate_mnd(priv->base, &sdc_regs, 7, 0, 0,
                                     CFG_CLK_SRC_GPLL0, 8);
                clk_enable_gpll0(priv->base, &gpll0_vote_clk);
                clk_enable_cbc(priv->base + SDCC_APPS_CBCR(1));
-               break;
-       case GCC_SDCC1_AHB_CLK:
-               clk_enable_cbc(priv->base + SDCC_AHB_CBCR(1));
-               break;
+               return rate;
        case GCC_ETH_RGMII_CLK:
                if (rate == 250000000)
                        clk_rcg_set_rate_mnd(priv->base, &emac_regs, 3, 0, 0,
                                             CFG_CLK_SRC_GPLL1, 8);
@@ -223,13 +217,17 @@ static ulong qcs404_clk_set_rate(struct clk *clk, ulong 
rate)
                                             CFG_CLK_SRC_GPLL1, 8);
                else if (rate == 5000000)
                        clk_rcg_set_rate_mnd(priv->base, &emac_regs, 3, 1, 50,
                                             CFG_CLK_SRC_GPLL1, 8);
-               break;
-       default:
-               return 0;
+               return rate;
        }
 
+       /* There is a bug only seeming to affect this board where the MMC 
driver somehow calls
+        * clk_set_rate() on a clock with id 0 which is associated with the 
qcom_clk device.
+        * The only clock with ID 0 is the xo_board clock which should not be 
associated with
+        * this device...
+        */
+       log_debug("Unknown clock id %ld\n", clk->id);
        return 0;
 }
 
 static int qcs404_clk_enable(struct clk *clk)
@@ -304,8 +302,11 @@ static int qcs404_clk_enable(struct clk *clk)
                clk_enable_cbc(priv->base + BLSP1_QUP4_I2C_APPS_CBCR);
                clk_rcg_set_rate(priv->base, &blsp1_qup4_i2c_apps_regs, 0,
                                 CFG_CLK_SRC_CXO);
                break;
+       case GCC_SDCC1_AHB_CLK:
+               clk_enable_cbc(priv->base + SDCC_AHB_CBCR(1));
+               break;
        default:
                return 0;
        }
 

-- 
2.43.1

Reply via email to