Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] OpenRD: relocate environment to 640kB

2013-08-11 Thread Sascha Silbe
Hi Albert,

Albert ARIBAUD albert.u.b...@aribaud.net writes:
 On Mon, 15 Jul 2013 08:19:57 -0400, Tom Rini tr...@ti.com wrote:
 On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 11:23:54AM +0200, Sascha Silbe wrote:

 With v2013.07-rc3, we are now at 376344B (~ 96% of 384KiB) for
 openrd_ultimate when built on Debian Wheezy using
 gcc-4.7-arm-linux-gnueabi from Emdebian.
[...]
 Yes, you can try using CONFIG_BOARD_SIZE_LIMIT, which is missing from
 the README, but does have a few examples (git grep around).  A patch to
 document it, and then a patch to enable for openrd would be much
 appreciated.  Thanks!

 Sascha, does this mean the env relocate patch here is dropped in favor
 of a CONFIG_BOARD_SIZE_LIMIT check at build time?

Given that we're already very close to the limit, we'll likely need the
environment relocation patch sooner or later anyway. I'd prefer it to go
in now as part of the regular release cycle, rather than as a hot-fix
whenever it finally spills over. That also reduces the risk of builds
failing only with particular toolchain versions.

Sascha


pgpn1UoGIiKjZ.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot


Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] OpenRD: relocate environment to 640kB

2013-07-29 Thread Albert ARIBAUD
Hi Sascha,

On Mon, 15 Jul 2013 08:19:57 -0400, Tom Rini tr...@ti.com wrote:

 On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 11:23:54AM +0200, Sascha Silbe wrote:
  Albert ARIBAUD albert.u.b...@aribaud.net writes:
  
   The situation has gotten better recently and U-Boot fits into the
   previous partition size of 384KiB again. So it isn't broken on OpenRD
   anymore and the above would seem like a good approach.
   How well does it fit again, and do you have any idea what caused the
   increase in size, and what caused the decrease?
  
  I had the same questions and tried a few buildman runs, but didn't get a
  clear picture. The size was going up and down for various slices of
  commits.
  
  With v2013.07-rc3, we are now at 376344B (??? 96% of 384KiB) for
  openrd_ultimate when built on Debian Wheezy using
  gcc-4.7-arm-linux-gnueabi from Emdebian.
  
  Is there an equivalent to CONFIG_SPL_MAX_SIZE for the regular U-Boot?
  Detecting the overlap at build time would prevent bricking the device
  using saveenv at run time. As an additional benefit, commits that push
  the size beyond the limit would also show up in buildman reports as
  build failures.
 
 Yes, you can try using CONFIG_BOARD_SIZE_LIMIT, which is missing from
 the README, but does have a few examples (git grep around).  A patch to
 document it, and then a patch to enable for openrd would be much
 appreciated.  Thanks!

Sascha, does this mean the env relocate patch here is dropped in favor
of a CONFIG_BOARD_SIZE_LIMIT check at build time?

Amicalement,
-- 
Albert.
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot


Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] OpenRD: relocate environment to 640kB

2013-07-15 Thread Sascha Silbe
Albert ARIBAUD albert.u.b...@aribaud.net writes:

 The situation has gotten better recently and U-Boot fits into the
 previous partition size of 384KiB again. So it isn't broken on OpenRD
 anymore and the above would seem like a good approach.
 How well does it fit again, and do you have any idea what caused the
 increase in size, and what caused the decrease?

I had the same questions and tried a few buildman runs, but didn't get a
clear picture. The size was going up and down for various slices of
commits.

With v2013.07-rc3, we are now at 376344B (≈ 96% of 384KiB) for
openrd_ultimate when built on Debian Wheezy using
gcc-4.7-arm-linux-gnueabi from Emdebian.

Is there an equivalent to CONFIG_SPL_MAX_SIZE for the regular U-Boot?
Detecting the overlap at build time would prevent bricking the device
using saveenv at run time. As an additional benefit, commits that push
the size beyond the limit would also show up in buildman reports as
build failures.

Sascha


pgpBUpjog_PVY.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot


Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] OpenRD: relocate environment to 640kB

2013-07-15 Thread Albert ARIBAUD
Hi Sascha,

On Mon, 15 Jul 2013 11:23:54 +0200, Sascha Silbe
t-ub...@infra-silbe.de wrote:

 Albert ARIBAUD albert.u.b...@aribaud.net writes:
 
  The situation has gotten better recently and U-Boot fits into the
  previous partition size of 384KiB again. So it isn't broken on OpenRD
  anymore and the above would seem like a good approach.
  How well does it fit again, and do you have any idea what caused the
  increase in size, and what caused the decrease?
 
 I had the same questions and tried a few buildman runs, but didn't get a
 clear picture. The size was going up and down for various slices of
 commits.
 
 With v2013.07-rc3, we are now at 376344B (≈ 96% of 384KiB) for
 openrd_ultimate when built on Debian Wheezy using
 gcc-4.7-arm-linux-gnueabi from Emdebian.

Thanks for the info.

 Is there an equivalent to CONFIG_SPL_MAX_SIZE for the regular U-Boot?
 Detecting the overlap at build time would prevent bricking the device
 using saveenv at run time. As an additional benefit, commits that push
 the size beyond the limit would also show up in buildman reports as
 build failures.

I don't know of a feature like CONFIG_SPL_MAX_SIZE for regular U-Boot.
You could 'port it over' as something like CONFIG_MAX_IMAGE_SIZE for
U-Boot.

Somehow I gather that an approach like the one I sketched out in
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.boot-loaders.u-boot/165510
could bring benefits like making CONFIG_SPL_MAX_SIZE a feature of a
constraints component which could be built as well in U-Boot as in
SPL; but that's at the very early RFC stage anyway -- actually, it drew
no reaction at all so far, leading me to think it's not that useful.

 Sascha

Amicalement,
-- 
Albert.
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot


Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] OpenRD: relocate environment to 640kB

2013-07-15 Thread Tom Rini
On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 11:23:54AM +0200, Sascha Silbe wrote:
 Albert ARIBAUD albert.u.b...@aribaud.net writes:
 
  The situation has gotten better recently and U-Boot fits into the
  previous partition size of 384KiB again. So it isn't broken on OpenRD
  anymore and the above would seem like a good approach.
  How well does it fit again, and do you have any idea what caused the
  increase in size, and what caused the decrease?
 
 I had the same questions and tried a few buildman runs, but didn't get a
 clear picture. The size was going up and down for various slices of
 commits.
 
 With v2013.07-rc3, we are now at 376344B (??? 96% of 384KiB) for
 openrd_ultimate when built on Debian Wheezy using
 gcc-4.7-arm-linux-gnueabi from Emdebian.
 
 Is there an equivalent to CONFIG_SPL_MAX_SIZE for the regular U-Boot?
 Detecting the overlap at build time would prevent bricking the device
 using saveenv at run time. As an additional benefit, commits that push
 the size beyond the limit would also show up in buildman reports as
 build failures.

Yes, you can try using CONFIG_BOARD_SIZE_LIMIT, which is missing from
the README, but does have a few examples (git grep around).  A patch to
document it, and then a patch to enable for openrd would be much
appreciated.  Thanks!

 
 Sascha



 ___
 U-Boot mailing list
 U-Boot@lists.denx.de
 http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot


-- 
Tom


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot


Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] OpenRD: relocate environment to 640kB

2013-07-11 Thread Tom Rini
On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 11:41:59AM +0200, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
 Hi Sascha,
 
 On Tue, 25 Jun 2013 11:42:53 +0200, Sascha Silbe
 t-ub...@infra-silbe.de wrote:
 
  Hello Albert, hello Tom,
  
  Albert ARIBAUD albert.u.b...@aribaud.net writes:
  
  [Move environment to account for increase in U-Boot size]
   This patch is for 2013.10, not 2013.07, but I prefer raising the issue
   as early as possible.
  
   If there is no way to make things smoother, then I think the 2013.10
   release notes should contain a red, blinking, paragraph about this. I
   would *hate* it if people were not warned and given a method to port
   their current environment setting over.
  
   Possibly even, the 2013.07 could have a warning about the change to
   come, so that people have a better chance yet to prepare for the
   change.
  
  The situation has gotten better recently and U-Boot fits into the
  previous partition size of 384KiB again. So it isn't broken on OpenRD
  anymore and the above would seem like a good approach.
 
 How well does it fit again, and do you have any idea what caused the
 increase in size, and what caused the decrease?

I imagine that adding -ffunction-sections/-fdata-sections/--gc-sections
is what brought the size back down again.  We've been adding a lot of
kinda optional code, and to avoid having to ifdef the hell out of
everything, we've been relying on growth not being a big problem or just
ignoring it.

-- 
Tom


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot


Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] OpenRD: relocate environment to 640kB

2013-07-11 Thread Albert ARIBAUD
Hi Tom,

On Thu, 11 Jul 2013 12:15:50 -0400, Tom Rini tr...@ti.com wrote:

 On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 11:41:59AM +0200, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
  Hi Sascha,
  
  On Tue, 25 Jun 2013 11:42:53 +0200, Sascha Silbe
  t-ub...@infra-silbe.de wrote:
  
   Hello Albert, hello Tom,
   
   Albert ARIBAUD albert.u.b...@aribaud.net writes:
   
   [Move environment to account for increase in U-Boot size]
This patch is for 2013.10, not 2013.07, but I prefer raising the issue
as early as possible.
   
If there is no way to make things smoother, then I think the 2013.10
release notes should contain a red, blinking, paragraph about this. I
would *hate* it if people were not warned and given a method to port
their current environment setting over.
   
Possibly even, the 2013.07 could have a warning about the change to
come, so that people have a better chance yet to prepare for the
change.
   
   The situation has gotten better recently and U-Boot fits into the
   previous partition size of 384KiB again. So it isn't broken on OpenRD
   anymore and the above would seem like a good approach.
  
  How well does it fit again, and do you have any idea what caused the
  increase in size, and what caused the decrease?
 
 I imagine that adding -ffunction-sections/-fdata-sections/--gc-sections
 is what brought the size back down again.  We've been adding a lot of
 kinda optional code, and to avoid having to ifdef the hell out of
 everything, we've been relying on growth not being a big problem or just
 ignoring it.

... Which in the end can bite back, see anonymous string issue. Are we
heading back to carefully selecting which files we build rather than
building then dropping?

Amicalement,
-- 
Albert.
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot


Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] OpenRD: relocate environment to 640kB

2013-07-11 Thread Tom Rini
On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 07:40:28PM +0200, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
 Hi Tom,
 
 On Thu, 11 Jul 2013 12:15:50 -0400, Tom Rini tr...@ti.com wrote:
 
  On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 11:41:59AM +0200, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
   Hi Sascha,
   
   On Tue, 25 Jun 2013 11:42:53 +0200, Sascha Silbe
   t-ub...@infra-silbe.de wrote:
   
Hello Albert, hello Tom,

Albert ARIBAUD albert.u.b...@aribaud.net writes:

[Move environment to account for increase in U-Boot size]
 This patch is for 2013.10, not 2013.07, but I prefer raising the issue
 as early as possible.

 If there is no way to make things smoother, then I think the 2013.10
 release notes should contain a red, blinking, paragraph about this. I
 would *hate* it if people were not warned and given a method to port
 their current environment setting over.

 Possibly even, the 2013.07 could have a warning about the change to
 come, so that people have a better chance yet to prepare for the
 change.

The situation has gotten better recently and U-Boot fits into the
previous partition size of 384KiB again. So it isn't broken on OpenRD
anymore and the above would seem like a good approach.
   
   How well does it fit again, and do you have any idea what caused the
   increase in size, and what caused the decrease?
  
  I imagine that adding -ffunction-sections/-fdata-sections/--gc-sections
  is what brought the size back down again.  We've been adding a lot of
  kinda optional code, and to avoid having to ifdef the hell out of
  everything, we've been relying on growth not being a big problem or just
  ignoring it.
 
 ... Which in the end can bite back, see anonymous string issue. Are we
 heading back to carefully selecting which files we build rather than
 building then dropping?

It depends on what we can get from the tools we have, cleanly.  I've
seen, for example, patches to kill all output from SPL, as that was
required to get the required big features into a size constrained SPL.
But I don't think it was clean enough for mainline.  On the other hand,
we've got some large files, and if splitting them up for logical uses
also gets us working around string issues, good for us.

-- 
Tom


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot


Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] OpenRD: relocate environment to 640kB

2013-06-27 Thread Albert ARIBAUD
Hi Sascha,

On Tue, 25 Jun 2013 11:42:53 +0200, Sascha Silbe
t-ub...@infra-silbe.de wrote:

 Hello Albert, hello Tom,
 
 Albert ARIBAUD albert.u.b...@aribaud.net writes:
 
 [Move environment to account for increase in U-Boot size]
  This patch is for 2013.10, not 2013.07, but I prefer raising the issue
  as early as possible.
 
  If there is no way to make things smoother, then I think the 2013.10
  release notes should contain a red, blinking, paragraph about this. I
  would *hate* it if people were not warned and given a method to port
  their current environment setting over.
 
  Possibly even, the 2013.07 could have a warning about the change to
  come, so that people have a better chance yet to prepare for the
  change.
 
 The situation has gotten better recently and U-Boot fits into the
 previous partition size of 384KiB again. So it isn't broken on OpenRD
 anymore and the above would seem like a good approach.

How well does it fit again, and do you have any idea what caused the
increase in size, and what caused the decrease?

 Where are the U-Boot Release Notes located? Who is responsible for
 editing them?
 
 Sascha

Amicalement,
-- 
Albert.
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot


Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] OpenRD: relocate environment to 640kB

2013-06-25 Thread Sascha Silbe
Hello Albert, hello Tom,

Albert ARIBAUD albert.u.b...@aribaud.net writes:

[Move environment to account for increase in U-Boot size]
 This patch is for 2013.10, not 2013.07, but I prefer raising the issue
 as early as possible.

 If there is no way to make things smoother, then I think the 2013.10
 release notes should contain a red, blinking, paragraph about this. I
 would *hate* it if people were not warned and given a method to port
 their current environment setting over.

 Possibly even, the 2013.07 could have a warning about the change to
 come, so that people have a better chance yet to prepare for the
 change.

The situation has gotten better recently and U-Boot fits into the
previous partition size of 384KiB again. So it isn't broken on OpenRD
anymore and the above would seem like a good approach.

Where are the U-Boot Release Notes located? Who is responsible for
editing them?

Sascha


pgp7TqeKwcqSm.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot


Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] OpenRD: relocate environment to 640kB

2013-06-22 Thread Albert ARIBAUD
On Tue, 11 Jun 2013 12:00:19 +0200, Albert ARIBAUD
albert.u.b...@aribaud.net wrote:

 Hi Sascha,
 
 On Mon, 27 May 2013 11:42:26 +0200, Sascha Silbe
 t-ub...@infra-silbe.de wrote:
 
  U-Boot has become slightly larger than where the environment sector
  was previously located. Saving the environment would brick the device.
  
  Relocate the environment to where it is with the stock (i.e. Marvell
  USP) U-Boot version. That should give plenty of room for U-Boot to
  grow, including local customisations.
  
  This obviously breaks compatibility with previous mainline versions of
  U-Boot. Users will need to back up the environment before an update
  and restore it afterwards, or manually copy it to the new address
  before the update.
  
  Signed-off-by: Sascha Silbe t-ub...@infra-silbe.de
  ---
   include/configs/openrd.h | 4 ++--
   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
  
  diff --git a/include/configs/openrd.h b/include/configs/openrd.h
  index 53bafe1..ea7f9aa 100644
  --- a/include/configs/openrd.h
  +++ b/include/configs/openrd.h
  @@ -90,8 +90,8 @@
* it has to be rounded to sector size
*/
   #define CONFIG_ENV_SIZE0x2 /* 128k */
  -#define CONFIG_ENV_ADDR0x6
  -#define CONFIG_ENV_OFFSET  0x6 /* env starts here */
  +#define CONFIG_ENV_ADDR0xa
  +#define CONFIG_ENV_OFFSET  0xa /* env starts here */
   
   /*
* Default environment variables
 
 CC:ing Tom.
 
 This patch is for 2013.10, not 2013.07, but I prefer raising the issue
 as early as possible.
 
 If there is no way to make things smoother, then I think the 2013.10
 release notes should contain a red, blinking, paragraph about this. I
 would *hate* it if people were not warned and given a method to port
 their current environment setting over.
 
 Possibly even, the 2013.07 could have a warning about the change to
 come, so that people have a better chance yet to prepare for the change.
 
 Amicalement,

Ping.

Amicalement,
-- 
Albert.
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot


Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] OpenRD: relocate environment to 640kB

2013-06-22 Thread Tom Rini
On Sat, Jun 22, 2013 at 11:29:59AM +0200, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:

 On Tue, 11 Jun 2013 12:00:19 +0200, Albert ARIBAUD
 albert.u.b...@aribaud.net wrote:
 
  Hi Sascha,
  
  On Mon, 27 May 2013 11:42:26 +0200, Sascha Silbe
  t-ub...@infra-silbe.de wrote:
  
   U-Boot has become slightly larger than where the environment sector
   was previously located. Saving the environment would brick the device.
   
   Relocate the environment to where it is with the stock (i.e. Marvell
   USP) U-Boot version. That should give plenty of room for U-Boot to
   grow, including local customisations.
   
   This obviously breaks compatibility with previous mainline versions of
   U-Boot. Users will need to back up the environment before an update
   and restore it afterwards, or manually copy it to the new address
   before the update.
   
   Signed-off-by: Sascha Silbe t-ub...@infra-silbe.de
   ---
include/configs/openrd.h | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
   
   diff --git a/include/configs/openrd.h b/include/configs/openrd.h
   index 53bafe1..ea7f9aa 100644
   --- a/include/configs/openrd.h
   +++ b/include/configs/openrd.h
   @@ -90,8 +90,8 @@
 * it has to be rounded to sector size
 */
#define CONFIG_ENV_SIZE  0x2 /* 128k */
   -#define CONFIG_ENV_ADDR  0x6
   -#define CONFIG_ENV_OFFSET0x6 /* env starts here */
   +#define CONFIG_ENV_ADDR  0xa
   +#define CONFIG_ENV_OFFSET0xa /* env starts here */

/*
 * Default environment variables
  
  CC:ing Tom.
  
  This patch is for 2013.10, not 2013.07, but I prefer raising the issue
  as early as possible.
  
  If there is no way to make things smoother, then I think the 2013.10
  release notes should contain a red, blinking, paragraph about this. I
  would *hate* it if people were not warned and given a method to port
  their current environment setting over.
  
  Possibly even, the 2013.07 could have a warning about the change to
  come, so that people have a better chance yet to prepare for the change.
  
  Amicalement,
 
 Ping.

Oh right, agree your idea here.

-- 
Tom


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot


Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] OpenRD: relocate environment to 640kB

2013-06-11 Thread Albert ARIBAUD
Hi Sascha,

On Mon, 27 May 2013 11:42:26 +0200, Sascha Silbe
t-ub...@infra-silbe.de wrote:

 U-Boot has become slightly larger than where the environment sector
 was previously located. Saving the environment would brick the device.
 
 Relocate the environment to where it is with the stock (i.e. Marvell
 USP) U-Boot version. That should give plenty of room for U-Boot to
 grow, including local customisations.
 
 This obviously breaks compatibility with previous mainline versions of
 U-Boot. Users will need to back up the environment before an update
 and restore it afterwards, or manually copy it to the new address
 before the update.
 
 Signed-off-by: Sascha Silbe t-ub...@infra-silbe.de
 ---
  include/configs/openrd.h | 4 ++--
  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
 
 diff --git a/include/configs/openrd.h b/include/configs/openrd.h
 index 53bafe1..ea7f9aa 100644
 --- a/include/configs/openrd.h
 +++ b/include/configs/openrd.h
 @@ -90,8 +90,8 @@
   * it has to be rounded to sector size
   */
  #define CONFIG_ENV_SIZE  0x2 /* 128k */
 -#define CONFIG_ENV_ADDR  0x6
 -#define CONFIG_ENV_OFFSET0x6 /* env starts here */
 +#define CONFIG_ENV_ADDR  0xa
 +#define CONFIG_ENV_OFFSET0xa /* env starts here */
  
  /*
   * Default environment variables

CC:ing Tom.

This patch is for 2013.10, not 2013.07, but I prefer raising the issue
as early as possible.

If there is no way to make things smoother, then I think the 2013.10
release notes should contain a red, blinking, paragraph about this. I
would *hate* it if people were not warned and given a method to port
their current environment setting over.

Possibly even, the 2013.07 could have a warning about the change to
come, so that people have a better chance yet to prepare for the change.

Amicalement,
-- 
Albert.
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot


[U-Boot] [PATCH] OpenRD: relocate environment to 640kB

2013-05-27 Thread Sascha Silbe
U-Boot has become slightly larger than where the environment sector
was previously located. Saving the environment would brick the device.

Relocate the environment to where it is with the stock (i.e. Marvell
USP) U-Boot version. That should give plenty of room for U-Boot to
grow, including local customisations.

This obviously breaks compatibility with previous mainline versions of
U-Boot. Users will need to back up the environment before an update
and restore it afterwards, or manually copy it to the new address
before the update.

Signed-off-by: Sascha Silbe t-ub...@infra-silbe.de
---
 include/configs/openrd.h | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/configs/openrd.h b/include/configs/openrd.h
index 53bafe1..ea7f9aa 100644
--- a/include/configs/openrd.h
+++ b/include/configs/openrd.h
@@ -90,8 +90,8 @@
  * it has to be rounded to sector size
  */
 #define CONFIG_ENV_SIZE0x2 /* 128k */
-#define CONFIG_ENV_ADDR0x6
-#define CONFIG_ENV_OFFSET  0x6 /* env starts here */
+#define CONFIG_ENV_ADDR0xa
+#define CONFIG_ENV_OFFSET  0xa /* env starts here */
 
 /*
  * Default environment variables
-- 
1.8.2.1

___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot