Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] km-powerpc: define CONFIG_PRAM to protect PHRAM and PNVRAM

2014-08-13 Thread Valentin Longchamp
Hi York,

On 08/12/2014 08:03 PM, York Sun wrote:
 On 07/18/2014 02:10 AM, Valentin Longchamp wrote:
 Hello Wolfgang,

 On 07/17/2014 02:47 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
 Dear Valentin,

 In message 
 1405599840-11984-1-git-send-email-valentin.longch...@keymile.com you 
 wrote:
 When u-boot initializes the RAM (early in boot) it looks for the pram
 env variable to know which is area it cannot use.

 At this early boot stage, the pram env variable is not avaible yet
 since it gets computed in set_km_env that gets called AFTER the RAM
 initialization. If the pram env variable is not found, the default
 CONFIG_PRAM value is used.

 Note that I am not objecting against this patch, but I highly
 recommend to fix your board - RAM initialization is actually pretty
 late in the init sequence, and you should have a valid envionment long
 before.


 Maybe my commit message is unclear about this. You are right, at the RAM
 initialization time, there is a valid environment, and that's the case on our
 board too.

 However, at the very first boot on a board, the environment is empty (or
 unvalid) and the default one is used where this pram env variable is not
 defined. That's why the CONFIG_PRAM is used in this case and it should be
 defined. This is not going to be the case at any later boot if a valid
 environment (with pram defined) is found and used.

 Best regards,

 
 
 Valentin,
 
 How about you update the commit message to
 explain you are defining the default CONFIG_PRAM for your board in case pram
 variable is not available?
 

OK, I will do ... even though the commit message already does already state
that, just with more details when and why (there was just a missing precision
here, when no valid environment was found) the pram env variable can be
undefined and why it is important for us to have such a value. But maybe that's
too much information ?

Valentin

___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot


Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] km-powerpc: define CONFIG_PRAM to protect PHRAM and PNVRAM

2014-08-12 Thread York Sun
On 07/18/2014 02:10 AM, Valentin Longchamp wrote:
 Hello Wolfgang,
 
 On 07/17/2014 02:47 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
 Dear Valentin,

 In message 
 1405599840-11984-1-git-send-email-valentin.longch...@keymile.com you wrote:
 When u-boot initializes the RAM (early in boot) it looks for the pram
 env variable to know which is area it cannot use.

 At this early boot stage, the pram env variable is not avaible yet
 since it gets computed in set_km_env that gets called AFTER the RAM
 initialization. If the pram env variable is not found, the default
 CONFIG_PRAM value is used.

 Note that I am not objecting against this patch, but I highly
 recommend to fix your board - RAM initialization is actually pretty
 late in the init sequence, and you should have a valid envionment long
 before.

 
 Maybe my commit message is unclear about this. You are right, at the RAM
 initialization time, there is a valid environment, and that's the case on our
 board too.
 
 However, at the very first boot on a board, the environment is empty (or
 unvalid) and the default one is used where this pram env variable is not
 defined. That's why the CONFIG_PRAM is used in this case and it should be
 defined. This is not going to be the case at any later boot if a valid
 environment (with pram defined) is found and used.
 
 Best regards,
 


Valentin,

How about you update the commit message to
explain you are defining the default CONFIG_PRAM for your board in case pram
variable is not available?

York

___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot


Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] km-powerpc: define CONFIG_PRAM to protect PHRAM and PNVRAM

2014-07-18 Thread Valentin Longchamp
Hello Wolfgang,

On 07/17/2014 02:47 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
 Dear Valentin,
 
 In message 1405599840-11984-1-git-send-email-valentin.longch...@keymile.com 
 you wrote:
 When u-boot initializes the RAM (early in boot) it looks for the pram
 env variable to know which is area it cannot use.

 At this early boot stage, the pram env variable is not avaible yet
 since it gets computed in set_km_env that gets called AFTER the RAM
 initialization. If the pram env variable is not found, the default
 CONFIG_PRAM value is used.
 
 Note that I am not objecting against this patch, but I highly
 recommend to fix your board - RAM initialization is actually pretty
 late in the init sequence, and you should have a valid envionment long
 before.
 

Maybe my commit message is unclear about this. You are right, at the RAM
initialization time, there is a valid environment, and that's the case on our
board too.

However, at the very first boot on a board, the environment is empty (or
unvalid) and the default one is used where this pram env variable is not
defined. That's why the CONFIG_PRAM is used in this case and it should be
defined. This is not going to be the case at any later boot if a valid
environment (with pram defined) is found and used.

Best regards,

Valentin

___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot


[U-Boot] [PATCH] km-powerpc: define CONFIG_PRAM to protect PHRAM and PNVRAM

2014-07-17 Thread Valentin Longchamp
When u-boot initializes the RAM (early in boot) it looks for the pram
env variable to know which is area it cannot use.

At this early boot stage, the pram env variable is not avaible yet
since it gets computed in set_km_env that gets called AFTER the RAM
initialization. If the pram env variable is not found, the default
CONFIG_PRAM value is used.

This value used to 0 (no protection at all). This patch sets it to a
value that covers PHRAM and PNVRAM that must be protected in our case.

Signed-off-by: Valentin Longchamp valentin.longch...@keymile.com
Signed-off-by: Holger Brunck holger.bru...@keymile.com
---

 include/configs/km/km-powerpc.h | 5 +++--
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/configs/km/km-powerpc.h b/include/configs/km/km-powerpc.h
index 763c5ba..eb85a74 100644
--- a/include/configs/km/km-powerpc.h
+++ b/include/configs/km/km-powerpc.h
@@ -59,8 +59,9 @@
 #define CONFIG_KM_PHRAM0x10
 /* resereved pram area at the end of memroy [hex] */
 #define CONFIG_KM_RESERVED_PRAM0x0
-/* enable protected RAM */
-#define CONFIG_PRAM0
+/* set the default PRAM value to at least PNVRAM + PHRAM when pram env variable
+ * is not valid yet, which is the case for when u-boot copies itself to RAM */
+#define CONFIG_PRAM((CONFIG_KM_PNVRAM + CONFIG_KM_PHRAM)10)
 
 #define CONFIG_KM_CRAMFS_ADDR  0x80
 #define CONFIG_KM_KERNEL_ADDR  0x40/* 3968Kbytes */
-- 
1.8.0.1

___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot


Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] km-powerpc: define CONFIG_PRAM to protect PHRAM and PNVRAM

2014-07-17 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Valentin,

In message 1405599840-11984-1-git-send-email-valentin.longch...@keymile.com 
you wrote:
 When u-boot initializes the RAM (early in boot) it looks for the pram
 env variable to know which is area it cannot use.
 
 At this early boot stage, the pram env variable is not avaible yet
 since it gets computed in set_km_env that gets called AFTER the RAM
 initialization. If the pram env variable is not found, the default
 CONFIG_PRAM value is used.

Note that I am not objecting against this patch, but I highly
recommend to fix your board - RAM initialization is actually pretty
late in the init sequence, and you should have a valid envionment long
before.

Best regards,

Wolfgang Denk

-- 
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk  Detlev Zundel
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: w...@denx.de
God may be subtle, but He isn't plain mean. - Albert Einstein
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot