Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] ppc4xx: Fix initialization of SDRAM_CODT register in ppc_4xx_ddr2.c
Okay, I will resubmit my patch. Carolyn -Original Message- From: Adam Graham [mailto:agra...@amcc.com] Sent: Tuesday, January 27, 2009 11:22 PM To: Stefan Roese; u-boot@lists.denx.de Cc: Smith, Carolyn J; Adam Graham; Victor Gallardo Subject: RE: [U-Boot] [PATCH] ppc4xx: Fix initialization of SDRAM_CODT register in ppc_4xx_ddr2.c Stefan, Carolyn, Yes, I do intend on sending out an AMCC patch to remove the definition for SDRAM_CODT_FEEBBACK_RCV_SINGLE_END and SDRAM_CODT_FEEBBACK_DRV_SINGLE_END. My apologies Carolyn as I should have notified you of this intent. My AMCC patch to remove these SDRAM_CODT bit definitions may come after your patch Carolyn, so in your patch do not include the usage of these (SDRAM_CODT_FEEBBACK_RCV_SINGLE_END and SDRAM_CODT_FEEBBACK_DRV_SINGLE_END) bits. According to our AMCC PPC4xx chip hardware designers, the SDRAM_CODT IP feedback signal is single ended (i.e. SDRAM_CODT bits 29 and 30). The PPC4xx SDRAM_CODT bits 29 and 30 are reserved non-changeable bits as they are set in the IP to single-ended mode: SDRAM_CODT bit 29 0 Sets feedback receiver to differential mode 1 Sets feedback receiver to single ended mode (mode set for the AMCC 4xx SoC chips) bit 30 0 Sets feedback driver to differential mode 1 Sets feedback driver to single ended mode (mode set for the AMCC 4xx SoC chips) Best, Adam -Original Message- From: Stefan Roese [mailto:s...@denx.de] Sent: Monday, January 26, 2009 9:47 PM To: u-boot@lists.denx.de Cc: carolyn.j.sm...@tektronix.com; Adam Graham Subject: Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] ppc4xx: Fix initialization of SDRAM_CODT register in ppc_4xx_ddr2.c On Monday 26 January 2009, carolyn.j.sm...@tektronix.com wrote: This fixes the initialization of the SDRAM_CODT register in the ppc4xx DDR2 initialization code. The changes were discussed with Stefan Roese and Adam Graham and tested by Adam. General comment: The line The changes were discussed... should be placed below the --- since it doesn't really belong to the patch description. Signed-off-by: Carolyn Smith carolyn.sm...@tektronix.com --- diff -w -uprN old/cpu/ppc4xx/44x_spd_ddr2.c new/cpu/ppc4xx/44x_spd_ddr2.c --- old/cpu/ppc4xx/44x_spd_ddr2.c 2009-01-20 13:00:33.0 -0800 +++ new/cpu/ppc4xx/44x_spd_ddr2.c 2009-01-23 16:00:49.0 -0800 @@ -1104,11 +1104,14 @@ static void program_codt(unsigned long * * Set the SDRAM Controller On Die Termination Register *-*/ mfsdram(SDRAM_CODT, codt); - codt |= (SDRAM_CODT_IO_NMODE - (~SDRAM_CODT_DQS_SINGLE_END -~SDRAM_CODT_CKSE_SINGLE_END -~SDRAM_CODT_FEEBBACK_RCV_SINGLE_END -~SDRAM_CODT_FEEBBACK_DRV_SINGLE_END)); + + codt |= SDRAM_CODT_IO_NMODE; + + codt = ~(SDRAM_CODT_DQS_SINGLE_END | + SDRAM_CODT_CKSE_SINGLE_END | + SDRAM_CODT_FEEBBACK_RCV_SINGLE_END | + SDRAM_CODT_FEEBBACK_DRV_SINGLE_END); + I don't think that this is correct. As I understood from Adam, those bits it questions are undefined/reserevd on all 4xx PPC's. So we should better remove the code referencing those values. Here is what Adam wrote: It is in fact the case for all the AMCC 4xx SoC chips that have the IBM SDRAM memory controller core IP, the SDRAM_CODT register, bits 29 and 30 are reserved bits. Thanks Carolyn for finding this issue. We will update the 44x_spd_ddr2.c file and send out a patch shortly for this SDRAM_CODT register bits 29-30 issue. Adam, do you still plan to send a patch for this? Or did I misunderstand you and the patch above is ok? Thanks. Best regards, Stefan = DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk Detlev Zundel HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany Phone: +49-8142-66989-0 Fax: +49-8142-66989-80 Email: off...@denx.de = ___ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] ppc4xx: Fix initialization of SDRAM_CODT register in ppc_4xx_ddr2.c
Stefan, Carolyn, Yes, I do intend on sending out an AMCC patch to remove the definition for SDRAM_CODT_FEEBBACK_RCV_SINGLE_END and SDRAM_CODT_FEEBBACK_DRV_SINGLE_END. My apologies Carolyn as I should have notified you of this intent. My AMCC patch to remove these SDRAM_CODT bit definitions may come after your patch Carolyn, so in your patch do not include the usage of these (SDRAM_CODT_FEEBBACK_RCV_SINGLE_END and SDRAM_CODT_FEEBBACK_DRV_SINGLE_END) bits. According to our AMCC PPC4xx chip hardware designers, the SDRAM_CODT IP feedback signal is single ended (i.e. SDRAM_CODT bits 29 and 30). The PPC4xx SDRAM_CODT bits 29 and 30 are reserved non-changeable bits as they are set in the IP to single-ended mode: SDRAM_CODT bit 29 0 Sets feedback receiver to differential mode 1 Sets feedback receiver to single ended mode (mode set for the AMCC 4xx SoC chips) bit 30 0 Sets feedback driver to differential mode 1 Sets feedback driver to single ended mode (mode set for the AMCC 4xx SoC chips) Best, Adam -Original Message- From: Stefan Roese [mailto:s...@denx.de] Sent: Monday, January 26, 2009 9:47 PM To: u-boot@lists.denx.de Cc: carolyn.j.sm...@tektronix.com; Adam Graham Subject: Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] ppc4xx: Fix initialization of SDRAM_CODT register in ppc_4xx_ddr2.c On Monday 26 January 2009, carolyn.j.sm...@tektronix.com wrote: This fixes the initialization of the SDRAM_CODT register in the ppc4xx DDR2 initialization code. The changes were discussed with Stefan Roese and Adam Graham and tested by Adam. General comment: The line The changes were discussed... should be placed below the --- since it doesn't really belong to the patch description. Signed-off-by: Carolyn Smith carolyn.sm...@tektronix.com --- diff -w -uprN old/cpu/ppc4xx/44x_spd_ddr2.c new/cpu/ppc4xx/44x_spd_ddr2.c --- old/cpu/ppc4xx/44x_spd_ddr2.c 2009-01-20 13:00:33.0 -0800 +++ new/cpu/ppc4xx/44x_spd_ddr2.c 2009-01-23 16:00:49.0 -0800 @@ -1104,11 +1104,14 @@ static void program_codt(unsigned long * * Set the SDRAM Controller On Die Termination Register *-*/ mfsdram(SDRAM_CODT, codt); - codt |= (SDRAM_CODT_IO_NMODE - (~SDRAM_CODT_DQS_SINGLE_END -~SDRAM_CODT_CKSE_SINGLE_END -~SDRAM_CODT_FEEBBACK_RCV_SINGLE_END -~SDRAM_CODT_FEEBBACK_DRV_SINGLE_END)); + + codt |= SDRAM_CODT_IO_NMODE; + + codt = ~(SDRAM_CODT_DQS_SINGLE_END | + SDRAM_CODT_CKSE_SINGLE_END | + SDRAM_CODT_FEEBBACK_RCV_SINGLE_END | + SDRAM_CODT_FEEBBACK_DRV_SINGLE_END); + I don't think that this is correct. As I understood from Adam, those bits it questions are undefined/reserevd on all 4xx PPC's. So we should better remove the code referencing those values. Here is what Adam wrote: It is in fact the case for all the AMCC 4xx SoC chips that have the IBM SDRAM memory controller core IP, the SDRAM_CODT register, bits 29 and 30 are reserved bits. Thanks Carolyn for finding this issue. We will update the 44x_spd_ddr2.c file and send out a patch shortly for this SDRAM_CODT register bits 29-30 issue. Adam, do you still plan to send a patch for this? Or did I misunderstand you and the patch above is ok? Thanks. Best regards, Stefan = DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk Detlev Zundel HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany Phone: +49-8142-66989-0 Fax: +49-8142-66989-80 Email: off...@denx.de = ___ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
[U-Boot] [PATCH] ppc4xx: Fix initialization of SDRAM_CODT register in ppc_4xx_ddr2.c
This fixes the initialization of the SDRAM_CODT register in the ppc4xx DDR2
initialization code. The changes were discussed with Stefan Roese and Adam
Graham and tested by Adam.
Signed-off-by: Carolyn Smith carolyn.sm...@tektronix.com
---
diff -w -uprN old/cpu/ppc4xx/44x_spd_ddr2.c new/cpu/ppc4xx/44x_spd_ddr2.c
--- old/cpu/ppc4xx/44x_spd_ddr2.c 2009-01-20 13:00:33.0 -0800
+++ new/cpu/ppc4xx/44x_spd_ddr2.c 2009-01-23 16:00:49.0 -0800
@@ -1104,11 +1104,14 @@ static void program_codt(unsigned long *
* Set the SDRAM Controller On Die Termination Register
*-*/
mfsdram(SDRAM_CODT, codt);
- codt |= (SDRAM_CODT_IO_NMODE
- (~SDRAM_CODT_DQS_SINGLE_END
-~SDRAM_CODT_CKSE_SINGLE_END
-~SDRAM_CODT_FEEBBACK_RCV_SINGLE_END
-~SDRAM_CODT_FEEBBACK_DRV_SINGLE_END));
+
+ codt |= SDRAM_CODT_IO_NMODE;
+
+ codt = ~(SDRAM_CODT_DQS_SINGLE_END |
+ SDRAM_CODT_CKSE_SINGLE_END |
+ SDRAM_CODT_FEEBBACK_RCV_SINGLE_END |
+ SDRAM_CODT_FEEBBACK_DRV_SINGLE_END);
+
for (dimm_num = 0; dimm_num num_dimm_banks; dimm_num++) {
if (dimm_populated[dimm_num] != SDRAM_NONE) {
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] ppc4xx: Fix initialization of SDRAM_CODT register in ppc_4xx_ddr2.c
On Monday 26 January 2009, carolyn.j.sm...@tektronix.com wrote: This fixes the initialization of the SDRAM_CODT register in the ppc4xx DDR2 initialization code. The changes were discussed with Stefan Roese and Adam Graham and tested by Adam. General comment: The line The changes were discussed... should be placed below the --- since it doesn't really belong to the patch description. Signed-off-by: Carolyn Smith carolyn.sm...@tektronix.com --- diff -w -uprN old/cpu/ppc4xx/44x_spd_ddr2.c new/cpu/ppc4xx/44x_spd_ddr2.c --- old/cpu/ppc4xx/44x_spd_ddr2.c 2009-01-20 13:00:33.0 -0800 +++ new/cpu/ppc4xx/44x_spd_ddr2.c 2009-01-23 16:00:49.0 -0800 @@ -1104,11 +1104,14 @@ static void program_codt(unsigned long * * Set the SDRAM Controller On Die Termination Register *-*/ mfsdram(SDRAM_CODT, codt); - codt |= (SDRAM_CODT_IO_NMODE - (~SDRAM_CODT_DQS_SINGLE_END -~SDRAM_CODT_CKSE_SINGLE_END -~SDRAM_CODT_FEEBBACK_RCV_SINGLE_END -~SDRAM_CODT_FEEBBACK_DRV_SINGLE_END)); + + codt |= SDRAM_CODT_IO_NMODE; + + codt = ~(SDRAM_CODT_DQS_SINGLE_END | + SDRAM_CODT_CKSE_SINGLE_END | + SDRAM_CODT_FEEBBACK_RCV_SINGLE_END | + SDRAM_CODT_FEEBBACK_DRV_SINGLE_END); + I don't think that this is correct. As I understood from Adam, those bits it questions are undefined/reserevd on all 4xx PPC's. So we should better remove the code referencing those values. Here is what Adam wrote: It is in fact the case for all the AMCC 4xx SoC chips that have the IBM SDRAM memory controller core IP, the SDRAM_CODT register, bits 29 and 30 are reserved bits. Thanks Carolyn for finding this issue. We will update the 44x_spd_ddr2.c file and send out a patch shortly for this SDRAM_CODT register bits 29-30 issue. Adam, do you still plan to send a patch for this? Or did I misunderstand you and the patch above is ok? Thanks. Best regards, Stefan = DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk Detlev Zundel HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany Phone: +49-8142-66989-0 Fax: +49-8142-66989-80 Email: off...@denx.de = ___ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
