Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v5 01/14] sun7i: Remove duplicate call to psci_arch_init

2015-03-21 Thread Hans de Goede

Hi,

On 11-03-15 16:11, Tom Rini wrote:

On Mon, Mar 09, 2015 at 08:00:11AM +0100, Jan Kiszka wrote:


This is already invoked a few cycles later in monitor mode by
_secure_monitor. Drop it here, it serves no purpose.


For clarity, because of the vector tables?

Reviewed-by: Tom Rini tr...@konsulko.com


I've just given this a test run on an A20 board and everything
psci related still works fine, so:

Tested-by: Hans de Goede hdego...@redhat.com

Regards,

Hans
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot


Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v5 01/14] sun7i: Remove duplicate call to psci_arch_init

2015-03-12 Thread Jan Kiszka
Am 2015-03-12 um 13:28 schrieb Tom Rini:
 On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 08:34:34AM +0100, Jan Kiszka wrote:
 Am 2015-03-11 um 16:11 schrieb Tom Rini:
 On Mon, Mar 09, 2015 at 08:00:11AM +0100, Jan Kiszka wrote:

 This is already invoked a few cycles later in monitor mode by
 _secure_monitor. Drop it here, it serves no purpose.

 For clarity, because of the vector tables?

 Sorry, didn't get the question yet. Are you asking why it was added
 initially (that would be a question for Marc) or why it serves no
 purpose now?
 
 You're saying we can drop the call to that function from where it was
 because it's called a few cycles later.  In mainline we would only (as
 far as I can see) call the function because the CPU went to the vector
 table and called it that way.
 
 Or rather, I'm unclear as to how the function would be called a few
 cycles later, can you please expand the commit message to make it
 clearer?  Thanks!

Yeah, the call chain continues like this: _sunxi_cpu_entry calls
_do_nonsec_entry which which triggers via smc #0 _secure_monitor, and
there we have the second invocation. There is no alternative path. Better?

Jan

-- 
Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT RTC ITP SES-DE
Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot


Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v5 01/14] sun7i: Remove duplicate call to psci_arch_init

2015-03-12 Thread Tom Rini
On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 08:34:34AM +0100, Jan Kiszka wrote:
 Am 2015-03-11 um 16:11 schrieb Tom Rini:
  On Mon, Mar 09, 2015 at 08:00:11AM +0100, Jan Kiszka wrote:
  
  This is already invoked a few cycles later in monitor mode by
  _secure_monitor. Drop it here, it serves no purpose.
  
  For clarity, because of the vector tables?
 
 Sorry, didn't get the question yet. Are you asking why it was added
 initially (that would be a question for Marc) or why it serves no
 purpose now?

You're saying we can drop the call to that function from where it was
because it's called a few cycles later.  In mainline we would only (as
far as I can see) call the function because the CPU went to the vector
table and called it that way.

Or rather, I'm unclear as to how the function would be called a few
cycles later, can you please expand the commit message to make it
clearer?  Thanks!

-- 
Tom


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot


Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v5 01/14] sun7i: Remove duplicate call to psci_arch_init

2015-03-12 Thread Jan Kiszka
Am 2015-03-11 um 16:11 schrieb Tom Rini:
 On Mon, Mar 09, 2015 at 08:00:11AM +0100, Jan Kiszka wrote:
 
 This is already invoked a few cycles later in monitor mode by
 _secure_monitor. Drop it here, it serves no purpose.
 
 For clarity, because of the vector tables?

Sorry, didn't get the question yet. Are you asking why it was added
initially (that would be a question for Marc) or why it serves no
purpose now?

Jan

-- 
Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT RTC ITP SES-DE
Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot


Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v5 01/14] sun7i: Remove duplicate call to psci_arch_init

2015-03-11 Thread Tom Rini
On Mon, Mar 09, 2015 at 08:00:11AM +0100, Jan Kiszka wrote:

 This is already invoked a few cycles later in monitor mode by
 _secure_monitor. Drop it here, it serves no purpose.

For clarity, because of the vector tables?

Reviewed-by: Tom Rini tr...@konsulko.com

-- 
Tom


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot


[U-Boot] [PATCH v5 01/14] sun7i: Remove duplicate call to psci_arch_init

2015-03-09 Thread Jan Kiszka
This is already invoked a few cycles later in monitor mode by
_secure_monitor. Drop it here, it serves no purpose.

CC: Marc Zyngier marc.zyng...@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Jan Kiszka jan.kis...@siemens.com
---
 arch/arm/cpu/armv7/sunxi/psci.S | 1 -
 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/sunxi/psci.S b/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/sunxi/psci.S
index 5be497b..9e898f2 100644
--- a/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/sunxi/psci.S
+++ b/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/sunxi/psci.S
@@ -254,7 +254,6 @@ _sunxi_cpu_entry:
isb
 
bl  _nonsec_init
-   bl  psci_arch_init
 
adr r0, _target_pc
ldr r0, [r0]
-- 
2.1.4

___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot