Re: [U-Boot] U-Boot maintainers: some boards are broken by recent mach-type update
Hi Albert Albert ARIBAUD wrote: U-Boot maintainers of such boards (in Cc: of this mail) should provide a patch to re-introduce the MACH_TYPE_XX definition in their boards' config header file in include/configs/. Could you please apply the following patches: - http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/122787/ - http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/122786/ Thank you Dave ___ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
Re: [U-Boot] U-Boot maintainers: some boards are broken by recent mach-type update
On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 23:10, Marek Vasut wrote: Here is the list of broken boards Ajay Bhargav ajay.bhar...@einfochips.com gplugd ARM926EJS (ARMADA100 88AP168 SoC) Ajay, you have warnings in your damn ethernet code !!! Have you ever tested it ?! let's be a little more accommodating from the get-go and assume that they have, and that something has changed in parallel -mike ___ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
Re: [U-Boot] U-Boot maintainers: some boards are broken by recent mach-type update
On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 20:00, Albert ARIBAUD wrote: (BTW: how about putting maintainer identity in boards.cfg, or at least turning MAINTAINERS into a format more easily parseable?) having a MAINTAINERS file that is compatible in syntax with the Linux kernel is nice, but i guess boards.cfg does make sense in the u-boot context in that it's a single db of board info. perhaps we could have it list aliases though and then we could maintain a muttrc compatible file which binds aliases to e-mails/names so we could directly leverage it from .git/mailrc ? -mike ___ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
[U-Boot] U-Boot maintainers: some boards are broken by recent mach-type update
Hello all, Recently the ARM mach-types.h file has been brought in sync with its Linux original, leasing to a number of boards not being listed any more, as the new list only contains boards which have actual Linux support or were declared less than one year ago. The symptom is a build failure with a message of the form error: 'MACH_TYPE_XX' undeclared (first use in this function). U-Boot maintainers of such boards (in Cc: of this mail) should provide a patch to re-introduce the MACH_TYPE_XX definition in their boards' config header file in include/configs/. Note that three boards do not have a maintainer and will be removed if nobody steps forward to take over their maintainership. They have been listed below as ORPHAN, and since they are all PXA boards, I have CC:ed Marek just in case. Here is the list of broken boards (BTW: how about putting maintainer identity in boards.cfg, or at least turning MAINTAINERS into a format more easily parseable?) - Ajay Bhargav ajay.bhar...@einfochips.com gplugd ARM926EJS (ARMADA100 88AP168 SoC) Luca Ceresoli luca.ceres...@comelit.it dig297 ARM ARMV7 (OMAP3530 SoC) Po-Yu Chuang ratb...@faraday-tech.com a320evb FA526 (ARM920T-like) (a320 SoC) Daniel Gorsulowski daniel.gorsulow...@esd.eu meesc ARM926EJS (AT91SAM9263 SoC) otc570 ARM926EJS (AT91SAM9263 SoC) Ilko Iliev il...@ronetix.at PM9261 AT91SAM9261 PM9263 AT91SAM9263 PM9G45 ARM926EJS (AT91SAM9G45 SoC) Prakash Kumar prak...@embedx.com cerf250 xscale/pxa Valentin Longchamp valentin.longch...@keymile.com km_kirkwood ARM926EJS (Kirkwood SoC) portl2 ARM926EJS (Kirkwood SoC) David Müller d.muel...@elsoft.ch VCMA9 ARM920T Jens Scharsig e...@bus-elektronik.de eb_cpux9k2 ARM920T (AT91RM9200 SoC) Heiko Schocher h...@denx.de mgcoge3un ARM926EJS (Kirkwood SoC) Robert Schwebel r.schwe...@pengutronix.de csb226 xscale/pxa innokom xscale/pxa Albin Tonnerre albin.tonne...@free-electrons.com sbc35_a9g20 ARM926EJS (AT91SAM9G20 SoC) tny_a9260 ARM926EJS (AT91SAM9260 SoC) tny_a9g20 ARM926EJS (AT91SAM9G20 SoC) Matthias Weisser weiss...@arcor.de jadecpu ARM926EJS (MB86R01 SoC) ORPHAN: cradle xscale/pxa pleb2 xscale/pxa xm250 xscale/pxa Amicalement, -- Albert. ___ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
Re: [U-Boot] U-Boot maintainers: some boards are broken by recent mach-type update
Hi Marek, On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 11:10:08PM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote: Robert Schwebel r.schwe...@pengutronix.de csb226 xscale/pxa innokom xscale/pxa Drop unless I get fixes from maintainer in a week or request for longer time to fix. (here I have some feeling it's not gonna be fixed) They won't. Both boards are not in my hands any more and long obsolete. So from my side, dropping them is just fine. rsc -- Pengutronix e.K. | | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0| Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917- | ___ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
Re: [U-Boot] U-Boot maintainers: some boards are broken by recent mach-type update
Hi Albert, Hello all, Recently the ARM mach-types.h file has been brought in sync with its Linux original, leasing to a number of boards not being listed any more, as the new list only contains boards which have actual Linux support or were declared less than one year ago. The symptom is a build failure with a message of the form error: 'MACH_TYPE_XX' undeclared (first use in this function). U-Boot maintainers of such boards (in Cc: of this mail) should provide a patch to re-introduce the MACH_TYPE_XX definition in their boards' config header file in include/configs/. Note that three boards do not have a maintainer and will be removed if nobody steps forward to take over their maintainership. They have been listed below as ORPHAN, and since they are all PXA boards, I have CC:ed Marek just in case. Here is the list of broken boards (BTW: how about putting maintainer identity in boards.cfg, or at least turning MAINTAINERS into a format more easily parseable?) - Ajay Bhargav ajay.bhar...@einfochips.com gplugd ARM926EJS (ARMADA100 88AP168 SoC) Ajay, you have warnings in your damn ethernet code !!! Have you ever tested it ?! Luca Ceresoli luca.ceres...@comelit.it dig297 ARM ARMV7 (OMAP3530 SoC) Po-Yu Chuang ratb...@faraday-tech.com a320evb FA526 (ARM920T-like) (a320 SoC) Daniel Gorsulowski daniel.gorsulow...@esd.eu meesc ARM926EJS (AT91SAM9263 SoC) otc570 ARM926EJS (AT91SAM9263 SoC) Ilko Iliev il...@ronetix.at PM9261 AT91SAM9261 PM9263 AT91SAM9263 PM9G45 ARM926EJS (AT91SAM9G45 SoC) Prakash Kumar prak...@embedx.com cerf250 xscale/pxa Drop unless I get fixes from maintainer in a week or request for longer time to fix. Valentin Longchamp valentin.longch...@keymile.com km_kirkwood ARM926EJS (Kirkwood SoC) portl2 ARM926EJS (Kirkwood SoC) David Müller d.muel...@elsoft.ch VCMA9 ARM920T Jens Scharsig e...@bus-elektronik.de eb_cpux9k2 ARM920T (AT91RM9200 SoC) Heiko Schocher h...@denx.de mgcoge3un ARM926EJS (Kirkwood SoC) Robert Schwebel r.schwe...@pengutronix.de csb226 xscale/pxa innokom xscale/pxa Drop unless I get fixes from maintainer in a week or request for longer time to fix. (here I have some feeling it's not gonna be fixed) Albin Tonnerre albin.tonne...@free-electrons.com sbc35_a9g20 ARM926EJS (AT91SAM9G20 SoC) tny_a9260 ARM926EJS (AT91SAM9260 SoC) tny_a9g20 ARM926EJS (AT91SAM9G20 SoC) Matthias Weisser weiss...@arcor.de jadecpu ARM926EJS (MB86R01 SoC) ORPHAN: cradle xscale/pxa pleb2 xscale/pxa xm250 xscale/pxa Drop, sorry. Cheers ___ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
