Re: [U-Boot] patman doesn't send patches

2012-08-30 Thread Simon Glass
On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 9:23 PM, Ilya Yanok
ilya.ya...@cogentembedded.com wrote:
 Hi Stefan,

 Stefan Roese sr at denx.de writes:
  Or does patman not even try to send, once checkpatch warning/errors are
  detected?

 That's it. Normally you don't want to send patches that are not
 chackpatch-clean. If you are sure that problems are irrelevant use -i switch 
 to
 ignore them.

 Regards, Ilya.

Thanks Ilya - yes that's the idea. - Simon



 ___
 U-Boot mailing list
 U-Boot@lists.denx.de
 http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot


Re: [U-Boot] patman doesn't send patches

2012-08-29 Thread Ilya Yanok
Hi Stefan,

Stefan Roese sr at denx.de writes:
  Or does patman not even try to send, once checkpatch warning/errors are
  detected?

That's it. Normally you don't want to send patches that are not
chackpatch-clean. If you are sure that problems are irrelevant use -i switch to
ignore them.

Regards, Ilya.


___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot


Re: [U-Boot] patman doesn't send patches

2012-08-28 Thread Stefan Roese
Hi Simon,

(added list this time)

On 08/28/2012 10:32 PM, Simon Glass wrote:
 Best to send to list and cc me.
 
 If you see this:
 
 git send-email
 git: 'send-email' is not a git command. See 'git --help'.
 
 try:
 
 sudo apt-get install git-email

I don't see any errors. And git send-email is working just fine for me.
I'm using it regularly.

Any other idea what might go wrong? Again, the generated patches in the
root directory look fine. But nothing is sent.

Thanks,
Stefan

 Regards,
 Simon
 
 On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 7:26 AM, Stefan Roese m...@roese.nl wrote:
 Hi Simon,

 finally I started using patman for the first time. The main problem I'm
 facing right now is, that the patches are not sent at all to the
 destination (Series-to: ...). I see no message/error/etc at the prompt,
 that patman even tried to send the patches. Should there be anything
 like this?

 Here the output of my current command:

 [stefan@ubuntu-2012 u-boot-tom-rini (a3m071-spl-v4b)]$
 ./tools/patman/patman -c12
 Cleaned 12 patches
 0 errors, 1 warnings for
 0001-SPL-Fix-build-problems-on-ARM-with-new-SPL-framework.patch:
 warning: arch/arm/lib/spl.c,36: externs should be avoided in .c files
 0 errors, 1 warnings for 0004-SPL-Add-NOR-flash-booting-support.patch:
 Internal error: some problems lost
 warning: common/spl/spl_nor.c,26: externs should be avoided in .c files
 0 errors, 2 warnings for 0008-mpc5200-Add-SPL-support.patch:
 Internal error: some problems lost
 warning: arch/powerpc/cpu/mpc5xxx/spl_boot.c,23: externs should be
 avoided in .c files
 warning: arch/powerpc/cpu/mpc5xxx/spl_boot.c,28: externs should be
 avoided in .c files
 0 errors, 2 warnings for 0009-mpc5200-Add-a3m071-board-support.patch:
 Internal error: some problems lost
 warning: include/configs/a3m071.h,334: line over 80 characters
 warning: include/configs/a3m071.h,341: line over 80 characters
 checkpatch.pl found 0 error(s), 6 warning(s)


 Or does patman not even try to send, once checkpatch warning/errors are
 detected?

 Any hints really appreciated.

 Thanks,
 Stefan
 

___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot