RE: [PATCH 4/5] fdt: Fix 'system' command

2020-03-17 Thread Tom Warren
-Original Message-
From: Stephen Warren  
Sent: Tuesday, March 17, 2020 10:33 AM
To: Tom Warren 
Cc: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] fdt: Fix 'system' command

External email: Use caution opening links or attachments


On 3/16/20 1:40 PM, twar...@nvidia.com wrote:
> From: Tom Warren 
>
> 'fdt systemsetup' wasn't working, due to the fact that the 'set' 
> command was being parsed in do_fdt() by only testing for the leading 
> 's' instead of "se", which kept the "sys" test further down from 
> executing. Changed to test for "se" instead, now 'fdt systemsetup' 
> works (to test the ft_system_setup proc w/o having to boot a kernel).

Reviewed-by: Stephen Warren 

(Although I wonder if this shouldn't just test the entire string to avoid any 
possible future ambiguity if more sub-commands are added later. Or doesn't 
U-Boot already have some sub-command table infra-structure this could use?)
[Tom] I usually take the path of least rework approach, so I just fixed the 
systemsetup command, which is what I was interested in. Let's see if any other 
Denxians chime in w/their opinion, and I can rework it if needed.


---
This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may 
contain
confidential information.  Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or 
distribution
is prohibited.  If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the 
sender by
reply email and destroy all copies of the original message.
---


Re: [PATCH 4/5] fdt: Fix 'system' command

2020-03-17 Thread Stephen Warren
On 3/16/20 1:40 PM, twar...@nvidia.com wrote:
> From: Tom Warren 
> 
> 'fdt systemsetup' wasn't working, due to the fact that the 'set' command
> was being parsed in do_fdt() by only testing for the leading 's' instead
> of "se", which kept the "sys" test further down from executing. Changed
> to test for "se" instead, now 'fdt systemsetup' works (to test the
> ft_system_setup proc w/o having to boot a kernel).

Reviewed-by: Stephen Warren 

(Although I wonder if this shouldn't just test the entire string to
avoid any possible future ambiguity if more sub-commands are added
later. Or doesn't U-Boot already have some sub-command table
infra-structure this could use?)