RE: [PATCH v1 03/16] arm: socfpga: Add function for checking description from FIT image
> -Original Message-
> From: Ang, Chee Hong
> Sent: Monday, August 17, 2020 12:34 PM
> To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
> Cc: Marek Vasut ; Simon Goldschmidt
> ; Tom Rini ; See,
> Chin Liang ; Tan, Ley Foon
> ; Ang, Chee Hong ;
> Chee, Tien Fong ; Lim, Elly Siew Chin
>
> Subject: [PATCH v1 03/16] arm: socfpga: Add function for checking
> description from FIT image
>
> Add board_fit_config_name_match() for matching board name with device
> tree files in FIT image. This will ensure correct DTB file is loaded for
> different
> board type. Currently, we are not supporting multiple device tree files in FIT
> image therefore this function basically do nothing for now.
> Users are allowed to override this 'weak' function in their specific board
> implementation.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chee Hong Ang
> ---
> arch/arm/mach-socfpga/board.c | 12 +++-
> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-socfpga/board.c b/arch/arm/mach-
> socfpga/board.c index 340abf9305..7993c27646 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-socfpga/board.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-socfpga/board.c
> @@ -13,7 +13,7 @@
> #include
> #include
> #include
> -
> +#include
> #include
> #include
>
> @@ -87,3 +87,13 @@ int g_dnl_board_usb_cable_connected(void)
> return 1;
> }
> #endif
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_SPL_BUILD
> +__weak int board_fit_config_name_match(const char *name) {
> + /* Just empty function now - can't decide what to choose */
> + debug("%s: %s\n", __func__, name);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +#endif
Reviewed-by: Ley Foon Tan
RE: [PATCH v1 03/16] arm: socfpga: Add function for checking description from FIT image
> -Original Message-
> From: Ang, Chee Hong
> Sent: Monday, August 17, 2020 12:34 PM
> To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
> Cc: Marek Vasut ; Simon Goldschmidt
> ; Tom Rini ; See,
> Chin Liang ; Tan, Ley Foon
> ; Ang, Chee Hong ;
> Chee, Tien Fong ; Lim, Elly Siew Chin
>
> Subject: [PATCH v1 03/16] arm: socfpga: Add function for checking
> description from FIT image
>
> Add board_fit_config_name_match() for matching board name with device
> tree files in FIT image. This will ensure correct DTB file is loaded for
> different
> board type. Currently, we are not supporting multiple device tree files in FIT
> image therefore this function basically do nothing for now.
> Users are allowed to override this 'weak' function in their specific board
> implementation.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chee Hong Ang
> ---
> arch/arm/mach-socfpga/board.c | 12 +++-
> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-socfpga/board.c b/arch/arm/mach-
> socfpga/board.c index 340abf9305..7993c27646 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-socfpga/board.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-socfpga/board.c
> @@ -13,7 +13,7 @@
> #include
> #include
> #include
> -
> +#include
> #include
> #include
>
> @@ -87,3 +87,13 @@ int g_dnl_board_usb_cable_connected(void)
> return 1;
> }
> #endif
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_SPL_BUILD
> +__weak int board_fit_config_name_match(const char *name) {
> + /* Just empty function now - can't decide what to choose */
> + debug("%s: %s\n", __func__, name);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +#endif
Reviewed-by: Ley Foon Tan
