Re: [PATCH v2] Makefile: socfpga: Generate spl/u-boot-splx4.sfp with 4 SPL images
On Tue, Aug 11, 2020 at 04:29:46PM +0200, Simon Goldschmidt wrote: > Am 11.08.2020 um 16:21 schrieb Tom Rini: > > On Tue, Aug 11, 2020 at 03:14:39PM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote: > >> On 8/11/20 3:06 PM, Tom Rini wrote: > >>> On Tue, Aug 11, 2020 at 04:01:10PM +0800, Chee Hong Ang wrote: > >>> > Generate spl/u-boot-splx4.sfp which consist of 4 SPL images required > for booting up Cyclone5/Arria10. > > For Cyclone5 using NAND flash image layout for 128 KB memory blocks, > 'make u-boot-with-nand-spl.sfp' to generate spl/u-boot-nand-splx4.sfp > which contains four 128KB SPL images (each 64KB SPL is followed by > 64KB of zero-padding). > > Signed-off-by: Chee Hong Ang > --- > Makefile | 11 +++ > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile > index 4483a9b..f4631f1 100644 > --- a/Makefile > +++ b/Makefile > @@ -1582,8 +1582,9 @@ u-boot.spr: spl/u-boot-spl.img u-boot.img FORCE > ifneq ($(CONFIG_ARCH_SOCFPGA),) > quiet_cmd_socboot = SOCBOOT $@ > cmd_socboot = cat spl/u-boot-spl.sfp spl/u-boot-spl.sfp \ > -spl/u-boot-spl.sfp spl/u-boot-spl.sfp \ > -u-boot.img > $@ || rm -f $@ > +spl/u-boot-spl.sfp \ > +spl/u-boot-spl.sfp > spl/u-boot-splx4.sfp ; \ > + cat spl/u-boot-splx4.sfp u-boot.img > $@ || rm -f $@ > u-boot-with-spl.sfp: spl/u-boot-spl.sfp u-boot.img FORCE > $(call if_changed,socboot) > > @@ -1592,8 +1593,10 @@ cmd_socnandboot = dd if=/dev/zero > of=spl/u-boot-spl.pad bs=64 count=1024 ; \ > cat spl/u-boot-spl.sfp spl/u-boot-spl.pad \ > spl/u-boot-spl.sfp spl/u-boot-spl.pad \ > spl/u-boot-spl.sfp spl/u-boot-spl.pad \ > -spl/u-boot-spl.sfp spl/u-boot-spl.pad \ > -u-boot.img > $@ || rm -f $@ spl/u-boot-spl.pad > +spl/u-boot-spl.sfp \ > +spl/u-boot-spl.pad > spl/u-boot-nand-splx4.sfp > ; \ > + cat spl/u-boot-nand-splx4.sfp u-boot.img > $@ || \ > + rm -f $@ spl/u-boot-spl.pad > u-boot-with-nand-spl.sfp: spl/u-boot-spl.sfp u-boot.img FORCE > $(call if_changed,socnandboot) > >>> > >>> It's not immediately clear to me why we're doing this here, rather than > >>> instructing the user to write the file 4 times when programming. On TI > >>> platforms, even on NAND, for forever there's been multiple locations the > >>> ROM will check for the loader. Is there a reason to not handle this at > >>> that level? > >> > >> The u-boot-with-spl.sfp was there to have one U-Boot image including > >> SPL, other platforms do that as well. Except for the NAND case, where > >> the padding is different. > > > > Right, it's a convenience file and handy in some cases. But what's the > > reason for doing the 4 copy case? It makes sense to create > > "u-boot-with-stuff-plus-header" when there's a header that has to cover > > the whole load, or you're going to write it to an SD card or there's > > some non-trivial mangling involved. Is the problem that > > "u-boot-spl.sfp" isn't ever expected to be seen by the user and so it > > would be odd to tell them to write that in the 4 places and then write > > u-boot.img in the correct place, so instead we have to pad everything > > out and make a large file? > > As U-Boot and SPL have to fit together, I think it's better to create > just one file that has to be written to SD card or flash. And writing to > NOR flash is, depending on how you do it, not too quick, so it's *very* > convenient to have this "4x SPL plus U-Boot" single file (start the > command, get a coffee and wait). > > And yes, it *is* just a convenience thing. But I think it's a good thing > to have as result from the build. Even if it's only for the "dumb > standard user" not having to know the offset where U-Boot has to be put... Alright, thanks. -- Tom signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: [PATCH v2] Makefile: socfpga: Generate spl/u-boot-splx4.sfp with 4 SPL images
Am 11.08.2020 um 16:21 schrieb Tom Rini: > On Tue, Aug 11, 2020 at 03:14:39PM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote: >> On 8/11/20 3:06 PM, Tom Rini wrote: >>> On Tue, Aug 11, 2020 at 04:01:10PM +0800, Chee Hong Ang wrote: >>> Generate spl/u-boot-splx4.sfp which consist of 4 SPL images required for booting up Cyclone5/Arria10. For Cyclone5 using NAND flash image layout for 128 KB memory blocks, 'make u-boot-with-nand-spl.sfp' to generate spl/u-boot-nand-splx4.sfp which contains four 128KB SPL images (each 64KB SPL is followed by 64KB of zero-padding). Signed-off-by: Chee Hong Ang --- Makefile | 11 +++ 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile index 4483a9b..f4631f1 100644 --- a/Makefile +++ b/Makefile @@ -1582,8 +1582,9 @@ u-boot.spr: spl/u-boot-spl.img u-boot.img FORCE ifneq ($(CONFIG_ARCH_SOCFPGA),) quiet_cmd_socboot = SOCBOOT $@ cmd_socboot = cat spl/u-boot-spl.sfp spl/u-boot-spl.sfp \ - spl/u-boot-spl.sfp spl/u-boot-spl.sfp \ - u-boot.img > $@ || rm -f $@ + spl/u-boot-spl.sfp \ + spl/u-boot-spl.sfp > spl/u-boot-splx4.sfp ; \ +cat spl/u-boot-splx4.sfp u-boot.img > $@ || rm -f $@ u-boot-with-spl.sfp: spl/u-boot-spl.sfp u-boot.img FORCE $(call if_changed,socboot) @@ -1592,8 +1593,10 @@ cmd_socnandboot = dd if=/dev/zero of=spl/u-boot-spl.pad bs=64 count=1024 ; \ cat spl/u-boot-spl.sfp spl/u-boot-spl.pad \ spl/u-boot-spl.sfp spl/u-boot-spl.pad \ spl/u-boot-spl.sfp spl/u-boot-spl.pad \ - spl/u-boot-spl.sfp spl/u-boot-spl.pad \ - u-boot.img > $@ || rm -f $@ spl/u-boot-spl.pad + spl/u-boot-spl.sfp \ + spl/u-boot-spl.pad > spl/u-boot-nand-splx4.sfp ; \ + cat spl/u-boot-nand-splx4.sfp u-boot.img > $@ || \ + rm -f $@ spl/u-boot-spl.pad u-boot-with-nand-spl.sfp: spl/u-boot-spl.sfp u-boot.img FORCE $(call if_changed,socnandboot) >>> >>> It's not immediately clear to me why we're doing this here, rather than >>> instructing the user to write the file 4 times when programming. On TI >>> platforms, even on NAND, for forever there's been multiple locations the >>> ROM will check for the loader. Is there a reason to not handle this at >>> that level? >> >> The u-boot-with-spl.sfp was there to have one U-Boot image including >> SPL, other platforms do that as well. Except for the NAND case, where >> the padding is different. > > Right, it's a convenience file and handy in some cases. But what's the > reason for doing the 4 copy case? It makes sense to create > "u-boot-with-stuff-plus-header" when there's a header that has to cover > the whole load, or you're going to write it to an SD card or there's > some non-trivial mangling involved. Is the problem that > "u-boot-spl.sfp" isn't ever expected to be seen by the user and so it > would be odd to tell them to write that in the 4 places and then write > u-boot.img in the correct place, so instead we have to pad everything > out and make a large file? As U-Boot and SPL have to fit together, I think it's better to create just one file that has to be written to SD card or flash. And writing to NOR flash is, depending on how you do it, not too quick, so it's *very* convenient to have this "4x SPL plus U-Boot" single file (start the command, get a coffee and wait). And yes, it *is* just a convenience thing. But I think it's a good thing to have as result from the build. Even if it's only for the "dumb standard user" not having to know the offset where U-Boot has to be put... Regards, Simon
Re: [PATCH v2] Makefile: socfpga: Generate spl/u-boot-splx4.sfp with 4 SPL images
On Tue, Aug 11, 2020 at 03:14:39PM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote: > On 8/11/20 3:06 PM, Tom Rini wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 11, 2020 at 04:01:10PM +0800, Chee Hong Ang wrote: > > > >> Generate spl/u-boot-splx4.sfp which consist of 4 SPL images required > >> for booting up Cyclone5/Arria10. > >> > >> For Cyclone5 using NAND flash image layout for 128 KB memory blocks, > >> 'make u-boot-with-nand-spl.sfp' to generate spl/u-boot-nand-splx4.sfp > >> which contains four 128KB SPL images (each 64KB SPL is followed by > >> 64KB of zero-padding). > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Chee Hong Ang > >> --- > >> Makefile | 11 +++ > >> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > >> > >> diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile > >> index 4483a9b..f4631f1 100644 > >> --- a/Makefile > >> +++ b/Makefile > >> @@ -1582,8 +1582,9 @@ u-boot.spr: spl/u-boot-spl.img u-boot.img FORCE > >> ifneq ($(CONFIG_ARCH_SOCFPGA),) > >> quiet_cmd_socboot = SOCBOOT $@ > >> cmd_socboot = cat spl/u-boot-spl.sfp spl/u-boot-spl.sfp \ > >> - spl/u-boot-spl.sfp spl/u-boot-spl.sfp \ > >> - u-boot.img > $@ || rm -f $@ > >> + spl/u-boot-spl.sfp \ > >> + spl/u-boot-spl.sfp > spl/u-boot-splx4.sfp ; \ > >> +cat spl/u-boot-splx4.sfp u-boot.img > $@ || rm -f $@ > >> u-boot-with-spl.sfp: spl/u-boot-spl.sfp u-boot.img FORCE > >>$(call if_changed,socboot) > >> > >> @@ -1592,8 +1593,10 @@ cmd_socnandboot = dd if=/dev/zero > >> of=spl/u-boot-spl.pad bs=64 count=1024 ; \ > >> cat spl/u-boot-spl.sfp spl/u-boot-spl.pad \ > >>spl/u-boot-spl.sfp spl/u-boot-spl.pad \ > >>spl/u-boot-spl.sfp spl/u-boot-spl.pad \ > >> - spl/u-boot-spl.sfp spl/u-boot-spl.pad \ > >> - u-boot.img > $@ || rm -f $@ spl/u-boot-spl.pad > >> + spl/u-boot-spl.sfp \ > >> + spl/u-boot-spl.pad > spl/u-boot-nand-splx4.sfp ; \ > >> + cat spl/u-boot-nand-splx4.sfp u-boot.img > $@ || \ > >> + rm -f $@ spl/u-boot-spl.pad > >> u-boot-with-nand-spl.sfp: spl/u-boot-spl.sfp u-boot.img FORCE > >>$(call if_changed,socnandboot) > > > > It's not immediately clear to me why we're doing this here, rather than > > instructing the user to write the file 4 times when programming. On TI > > platforms, even on NAND, for forever there's been multiple locations the > > ROM will check for the loader. Is there a reason to not handle this at > > that level? > > The u-boot-with-spl.sfp was there to have one U-Boot image including > SPL, other platforms do that as well. Except for the NAND case, where > the padding is different. Right, it's a convenience file and handy in some cases. But what's the reason for doing the 4 copy case? It makes sense to create "u-boot-with-stuff-plus-header" when there's a header that has to cover the whole load, or you're going to write it to an SD card or there's some non-trivial mangling involved. Is the problem that "u-boot-spl.sfp" isn't ever expected to be seen by the user and so it would be odd to tell them to write that in the 4 places and then write u-boot.img in the correct place, so instead we have to pad everything out and make a large file? -- Tom signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: [PATCH v2] Makefile: socfpga: Generate spl/u-boot-splx4.sfp with 4 SPL images
On 8/11/20 3:06 PM, Tom Rini wrote: > On Tue, Aug 11, 2020 at 04:01:10PM +0800, Chee Hong Ang wrote: > >> Generate spl/u-boot-splx4.sfp which consist of 4 SPL images required >> for booting up Cyclone5/Arria10. >> >> For Cyclone5 using NAND flash image layout for 128 KB memory blocks, >> 'make u-boot-with-nand-spl.sfp' to generate spl/u-boot-nand-splx4.sfp >> which contains four 128KB SPL images (each 64KB SPL is followed by >> 64KB of zero-padding). >> >> Signed-off-by: Chee Hong Ang >> --- >> Makefile | 11 +++ >> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile >> index 4483a9b..f4631f1 100644 >> --- a/Makefile >> +++ b/Makefile >> @@ -1582,8 +1582,9 @@ u-boot.spr: spl/u-boot-spl.img u-boot.img FORCE >> ifneq ($(CONFIG_ARCH_SOCFPGA),) >> quiet_cmd_socboot = SOCBOOT $@ >> cmd_socboot = cat spl/u-boot-spl.sfp spl/u-boot-spl.sfp \ >> -spl/u-boot-spl.sfp spl/u-boot-spl.sfp \ >> -u-boot.img > $@ || rm -f $@ >> +spl/u-boot-spl.sfp \ >> +spl/u-boot-spl.sfp > spl/u-boot-splx4.sfp ; \ >> + cat spl/u-boot-splx4.sfp u-boot.img > $@ || rm -f $@ >> u-boot-with-spl.sfp: spl/u-boot-spl.sfp u-boot.img FORCE >> $(call if_changed,socboot) >> >> @@ -1592,8 +1593,10 @@ cmd_socnandboot = dd if=/dev/zero >> of=spl/u-boot-spl.pad bs=64 count=1024 ; \ >> cat spl/u-boot-spl.sfp spl/u-boot-spl.pad \ >> spl/u-boot-spl.sfp spl/u-boot-spl.pad \ >> spl/u-boot-spl.sfp spl/u-boot-spl.pad \ >> -spl/u-boot-spl.sfp spl/u-boot-spl.pad \ >> -u-boot.img > $@ || rm -f $@ spl/u-boot-spl.pad >> +spl/u-boot-spl.sfp \ >> +spl/u-boot-spl.pad > spl/u-boot-nand-splx4.sfp ; \ >> + cat spl/u-boot-nand-splx4.sfp u-boot.img > $@ || \ >> + rm -f $@ spl/u-boot-spl.pad >> u-boot-with-nand-spl.sfp: spl/u-boot-spl.sfp u-boot.img FORCE >> $(call if_changed,socnandboot) > > It's not immediately clear to me why we're doing this here, rather than > instructing the user to write the file 4 times when programming. On TI > platforms, even on NAND, for forever there's been multiple locations the > ROM will check for the loader. Is there a reason to not handle this at > that level? The u-boot-with-spl.sfp was there to have one U-Boot image including SPL, other platforms do that as well. Except for the NAND case, where the padding is different.
Re: [PATCH v2] Makefile: socfpga: Generate spl/u-boot-splx4.sfp with 4 SPL images
On Tue, Aug 11, 2020 at 04:01:10PM +0800, Chee Hong Ang wrote: > Generate spl/u-boot-splx4.sfp which consist of 4 SPL images required > for booting up Cyclone5/Arria10. > > For Cyclone5 using NAND flash image layout for 128 KB memory blocks, > 'make u-boot-with-nand-spl.sfp' to generate spl/u-boot-nand-splx4.sfp > which contains four 128KB SPL images (each 64KB SPL is followed by > 64KB of zero-padding). > > Signed-off-by: Chee Hong Ang > --- > Makefile | 11 +++ > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile > index 4483a9b..f4631f1 100644 > --- a/Makefile > +++ b/Makefile > @@ -1582,8 +1582,9 @@ u-boot.spr: spl/u-boot-spl.img u-boot.img FORCE > ifneq ($(CONFIG_ARCH_SOCFPGA),) > quiet_cmd_socboot = SOCBOOT $@ > cmd_socboot = catspl/u-boot-spl.sfp spl/u-boot-spl.sfp \ > - spl/u-boot-spl.sfp spl/u-boot-spl.sfp \ > - u-boot.img > $@ || rm -f $@ > + spl/u-boot-spl.sfp \ > + spl/u-boot-spl.sfp > spl/u-boot-splx4.sfp ; \ > + cat spl/u-boot-splx4.sfp u-boot.img > $@ || rm -f $@ > u-boot-with-spl.sfp: spl/u-boot-spl.sfp u-boot.img FORCE > $(call if_changed,socboot) > > @@ -1592,8 +1593,10 @@ cmd_socnandboot = dd if=/dev/zero > of=spl/u-boot-spl.pad bs=64 count=1024 ; \ > cat spl/u-boot-spl.sfp spl/u-boot-spl.pad \ > spl/u-boot-spl.sfp spl/u-boot-spl.pad \ > spl/u-boot-spl.sfp spl/u-boot-spl.pad \ > - spl/u-boot-spl.sfp spl/u-boot-spl.pad \ > - u-boot.img > $@ || rm -f $@ spl/u-boot-spl.pad > + spl/u-boot-spl.sfp \ > + spl/u-boot-spl.pad > spl/u-boot-nand-splx4.sfp ; \ > +cat spl/u-boot-nand-splx4.sfp u-boot.img > $@ || \ > +rm -f $@ spl/u-boot-spl.pad > u-boot-with-nand-spl.sfp: spl/u-boot-spl.sfp u-boot.img FORCE > $(call if_changed,socnandboot) It's not immediately clear to me why we're doing this here, rather than instructing the user to write the file 4 times when programming. On TI platforms, even on NAND, for forever there's been multiple locations the ROM will check for the loader. Is there a reason to not handle this at that level? -- Tom signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: [PATCH v2] Makefile: socfpga: Generate spl/u-boot-splx4.sfp with 4 SPL images
On 8/11/20 1:34 PM, Ang, Chee Hong wrote: >> On 8/11/20 10:01 AM, Chee Hong Ang wrote: >>> Generate spl/u-boot-splx4.sfp which consist of 4 SPL images required >>> for booting up Cyclone5/Arria10. >>> >>> For Cyclone5 using NAND flash image layout for 128 KB memory blocks, >>> 'make u-boot-with-nand-spl.sfp' to generate spl/u-boot-nand-splx4.sfp >>> which contains four 128KB SPL images (each 64KB SPL is followed by >>> 64KB of zero-padding). >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Chee Hong Ang >>> --- >> >> What changed between V1 and V2 ? Changelog is missing. > In V2, 'make u-boot-with-nand-spl.sfp' will generate > spl/u-boot-nand-splx4.sfp which contains 4 x (SPL + 64KB padding). > Commit message already mentioned how to generate this SFP file with 64Kb > padding for each SPL in SFP. The changelog in the patches is there so it's quickly obvious what changed in the patch without searching for previous version and running a diff. >>> Makefile | 11 +++ >>> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) >>> >>> diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile >>> index 4483a9b..f4631f1 100644 >>> --- a/Makefile >>> +++ b/Makefile >>> @@ -1582,8 +1582,9 @@ u-boot.spr: spl/u-boot-spl.img u-boot.img FORCE >>> ifneq ($(CONFIG_ARCH_SOCFPGA),) quiet_cmd_socboot = SOCBOOT $@ >>> cmd_socboot = cat spl/u-boot-spl.sfp spl/u-boot-spl.sfp \ >>> - spl/u-boot-spl.sfp spl/u-boot-spl.sfp \ >>> - u-boot.img > $@ || rm -f $@ >>> + spl/u-boot-spl.sfp \ >>> + spl/u-boot-spl.sfp > spl/u-boot-splx4.sfp ; \ >>> + cat spl/u-boot-splx4.sfp u-boot.img > $@ || rm -f $@ >>> u-boot-with-spl.sfp: spl/u-boot-spl.sfp u-boot.img FORCE >>> $(call if_changed,socboot) >> >> Also, now that I look at it, if you want to generate some new target, it >> should be a Makefile target, just like u-boot-with-spl.sfp is a Makefile >> target. >> So then you can do make . > > There is already a target 'u-boot-with-nand-spl.sfp' in Makefile: > u-boot-with-nand-spl.sfp: spl/u-boot-spl.sfp u-boot.img FORCE > $(call if_changed,socnandboot) Right, so there should be a new one, u-boot-with-spl-x4.sfp: spl/u-boot-spl.sfp FORCE and then whatever target needs the -x4 variant should again depend on it, e.g. u-boot-with-nand-spl.sfp: spl/u-boot-spl-x4.sfp u-boot.img FORCE
RE: [PATCH v2] Makefile: socfpga: Generate spl/u-boot-splx4.sfp with 4 SPL images
> On 8/11/20 10:01 AM, Chee Hong Ang wrote: > > Generate spl/u-boot-splx4.sfp which consist of 4 SPL images required > > for booting up Cyclone5/Arria10. > > > > For Cyclone5 using NAND flash image layout for 128 KB memory blocks, > > 'make u-boot-with-nand-spl.sfp' to generate spl/u-boot-nand-splx4.sfp > > which contains four 128KB SPL images (each 64KB SPL is followed by > > 64KB of zero-padding). > > > > Signed-off-by: Chee Hong Ang > > --- > > What changed between V1 and V2 ? Changelog is missing. In V2, 'make u-boot-with-nand-spl.sfp' will generate spl/u-boot-nand-splx4.sfp which contains 4 x (SPL + 64KB padding). Commit message already mentioned how to generate this SFP file with 64Kb padding for each SPL in SFP. > > > Makefile | 11 +++ > > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile > > index 4483a9b..f4631f1 100644 > > --- a/Makefile > > +++ b/Makefile > > @@ -1582,8 +1582,9 @@ u-boot.spr: spl/u-boot-spl.img u-boot.img FORCE > > ifneq ($(CONFIG_ARCH_SOCFPGA),) quiet_cmd_socboot = SOCBOOT $@ > > cmd_socboot = cat spl/u-boot-spl.sfp spl/u-boot-spl.sfp \ > > - spl/u-boot-spl.sfp spl/u-boot-spl.sfp \ > > - u-boot.img > $@ || rm -f $@ > > + spl/u-boot-spl.sfp \ > > + spl/u-boot-spl.sfp > spl/u-boot-splx4.sfp ; \ > > + cat spl/u-boot-splx4.sfp u-boot.img > $@ || rm -f $@ > > u-boot-with-spl.sfp: spl/u-boot-spl.sfp u-boot.img FORCE > > $(call if_changed,socboot) > > Also, now that I look at it, if you want to generate some new target, it > should be a Makefile target, just like u-boot-with-spl.sfp is a Makefile > target. > So then you can do make . There is already a target 'u-boot-with-nand-spl.sfp' in Makefile: u-boot-with-nand-spl.sfp: spl/u-boot-spl.sfp u-boot.img FORCE $(call if_changed,socnandboot) V2 patch contains the following changes as well which are missing in this email thread: @@ -1592,8 +1593,10 @@ cmd_socnandboot = dd if=/dev/zero of=spl/u-boot-spl.pad bs=64 count=1024 ; \ cat spl/u-boot-spl.sfp spl/u-boot-spl.pad \ spl/u-boot-spl.sfp spl/u-boot-spl.pad \ spl/u-boot-spl.sfp spl/u-boot-spl.pad \ - spl/u-boot-spl.sfp spl/u-boot-spl.pad \ - u-boot.img > $@ || rm -f $@ spl/u-boot-spl.pad + spl/u-boot-spl.sfp \ + spl/u-boot-spl.pad > spl/u-boot-nand-splx4.sfp ; \ + cat spl/u-boot-nand-splx4.sfp u-boot.img > $@ || \ + rm -f $@ spl/u-boot-spl.pad u-boot-with-nand-spl.sfp: spl/u-boot-spl.sfp u-boot.img FORCE $(call if_changed,socnandboot)
Re: [PATCH v2] Makefile: socfpga: Generate spl/u-boot-splx4.sfp with 4 SPL images
On 8/11/20 10:01 AM, Chee Hong Ang wrote: > Generate spl/u-boot-splx4.sfp which consist of 4 SPL images required > for booting up Cyclone5/Arria10. > > For Cyclone5 using NAND flash image layout for 128 KB memory blocks, > 'make u-boot-with-nand-spl.sfp' to generate spl/u-boot-nand-splx4.sfp > which contains four 128KB SPL images (each 64KB SPL is followed by > 64KB of zero-padding). > > Signed-off-by: Chee Hong Ang > --- What changed between V1 and V2 ? Changelog is missing. > Makefile | 11 +++ > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile > index 4483a9b..f4631f1 100644 > --- a/Makefile > +++ b/Makefile > @@ -1582,8 +1582,9 @@ u-boot.spr: spl/u-boot-spl.img u-boot.img FORCE > ifneq ($(CONFIG_ARCH_SOCFPGA),) > quiet_cmd_socboot = SOCBOOT $@ > cmd_socboot = catspl/u-boot-spl.sfp spl/u-boot-spl.sfp \ > - spl/u-boot-spl.sfp spl/u-boot-spl.sfp \ > - u-boot.img > $@ || rm -f $@ > + spl/u-boot-spl.sfp \ > + spl/u-boot-spl.sfp > spl/u-boot-splx4.sfp ; \ > + cat spl/u-boot-splx4.sfp u-boot.img > $@ || rm -f $@ > u-boot-with-spl.sfp: spl/u-boot-spl.sfp u-boot.img FORCE > $(call if_changed,socboot) Also, now that I look at it, if you want to generate some new target, it should be a Makefile target, just like u-boot-with-spl.sfp is a Makefile target. So then you can do make .
