Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/2] cmd:gpt: randomly generate each partition uuid if undefined

2014-03-03 Thread Przemyslaw Marczak

Hello again,

On 02/28/2014 06:03 PM, Stephen Warren wrote:

On 02/28/2014 08:18 AM, Przemyslaw Marczak wrote:

Changes:
- randomly generate each partition uuid if undefined
- print info about generated uuid
- save environment on gpt write success
- update doc/README.gpt



diff --git a/common/cmd_gpt.c b/common/cmd_gpt.c



  static char extract_env(const char *str, char **env)
  {
+   int ret = -1;


Why does the function return char not int? At least the type of ret
should match the return type of the function.



Right notice, this should be fixed.


There's no need to introduce a ret variable anyway; just don't delete
the return statements that are already in the function.



But I need to move free(s) so I can't leave current return statements. 
Other way I need to put free(s) in few places.



@@ -43,16 +44,23 @@ static char extract_env(const char *str, char **env)
memset(s + strlen(s) - 1, '\0', 1);
memmove(s, s + 2, strlen(s) - 1);
e = getenv(s);
-   free(s);
if (e == NULL) {
-   printf(Environmental '%s' not set\n, str);
-   return -1; /* env not set */
+   printf(%s unset. , str);
+   e = get_uuid_str();
+   if (e) {
+   printf(Setting to: %s\n, e);
+   setenv(s, e);


And here I forget about free(e)...



Why should the environment variable be set? I rather dislike commands
that randomly set environment variables as an implicit side-effect.



Actually automatically generated uuids was the main purpose of this 
patches. Setting each env variable in this place was the most easy way 
to make this without a lot of duplicated code.


Why do you treat it like a side-effect?
If user wants have own generated uuids - then he can manually set env 
variables like uuid_gpt_disk.
This actually is not changed - when uuid env is set then it will be used 
like in current version of code.
When user can't generate uuids or just wants to have it automatically 
generated then my code do this job.



It'd be far better if this function simply wasn't modified, but rather
the user was provided with a function to explicitly set an environment
variable to a randomly generated GPT. That way the user/script would be
in control. Something like:

$ gen_random_uuid env_var_name



I understand that this is very important code, but setting each val 
manually with random uuid actually will not change anything - user still 
needs to do something.


The other way is to provide a function for parse e.g $partitions but 
then it will be a code duplication. The main job is done by 
set_gpt_info() so this is why I modified this code.



@@ -299,8 +307,17 @@ static int do_gpt(cmd_tbl_t *cmdtp, int flag, int argc, 
char * const argv[])
return CMD_RET_FAILURE;
}

-   if (gpt_default(blk_dev_desc, argv[4]))
+   puts(Writing GPT: );
+
+   ret = gpt_default(blk_dev_desc, argv[4]);
+   if (!ret) {
+   puts(success!\n);
+   saveenv();


Uggh. Definitely don't save the environment behind the user's back.
There is no reason to believe that's safe. What if the user had added
some temporary changes to their environment that they didn't want saved?
This kind of logic belongs in scripts, not code.




The one and only reason for put saveenv() here was that if uuids are 
randomly generated or even just are in environment then I can be sure 
that next gpt write (e.g. in case of overwrite sector 0 by mistake) is 
using the same uuids values.


Maybe saveenv() in this place is not the best idea but in other side 
user actually uses this command just once.


Thank you
--
Przemyslaw Marczak
Samsung RD Institute Poland
Samsung Electronics
p.marc...@samsung.com
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot


Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/2] cmd:gpt: randomly generate each partition uuid if undefined

2014-03-03 Thread Tom Rini
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On 03/03/2014 08:45 AM, Przemyslaw Marczak wrote:

[snip]
 Actually automatically generated uuids was the main purpose of this
 patches. Setting each env variable in this place was the most easy way
 to make this without a lot of duplicated code.
 
 Why do you treat it like a side-effect?
 If user wants have own generated uuids - then he can manually set env
 variables like uuid_gpt_disk.
 This actually is not changed - when uuid env is set then it will be used
 like in current version of code.
 When user can't generate uuids or just wants to have it automatically
 generated then my code do this job.

Having been using this code again myself recently, at the high level,
this is useful.  Having to copy/paste in N UUIDs gets silly.  But I also
wonder..

[snip]
 The one and only reason for put saveenv() here was that if uuids are
 randomly generated or even just are in environment then I can be sure
 that next gpt write (e.g. in case of overwrite sector 0 by mistake) is
 using the same uuids values.

Is this really an important use case to cover?

The way I see things, would it be possible (and not a pain) to make the
UUID part of the partition string passed to 'gpt write' optional.  If
not passed, generate the UUIDs needed.  What was used would be seen in
'part list' and so forth.

- -- 
Tom
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/

iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJTFI32AAoJENk4IS6UOR1WAyQP/2bfClvRaWtLzUDggRUnNr99
RKSgB1m/nl09ZwclB2Gn1FZL2IR/M0u+ia89FE9leSN4eoOEswN2rrUiExVv7QpJ
d+oCH/H3oNDAyb9L4HXXYHeRGCVHK7KE/KP5Ngb7KfTGZhj5kHdkx9iQM7dO9OtX
DmvW5+JoRXgXPkpmvy5s20IzRUbBEqGC6Z2h8Y/VKHTDnrUmYvFb6XPgjwwrYVB6
+Hx/7K2R1uXQTuoHM7FqVAqKx7GGiUmcpLG90iHeYcX4fib/+RwC7hcre0rRj71v
NyAnO4t0nXKefLXYe5iGold7cNx9xUKO3s4u2EkC9lNGRkN6RcVuaxzEKGD4/QTX
fHA2q6FwSVLv4lXBT6UWxXiky2C9TMY/DUNM0EWe2KSx2V2glXPKiBX7gRk0Rq0d
EWq1G5oQS0qiZgb+vUQ4Acf4/HDjhAl1l18Hx6w+26LNvz8Fi+o7Om4kkBdI5sos
GX2auS1RxQc3qQkrAjxFx1xpDr9iMikV6nNqYDcVU894PeCgzmUWaWG/IrBFixO6
2XjF1sMth8LrVqUHirh3Y7lDU+FFPP+mMb6eaY3oajtVkg3u6cpQ0eJ0A612CsXG
oaTPxWKKTsWlBxaVIgzu2OXeYg5BJF4OTKxjNiV2wptheEVc4RVLDiQ1yf74YEHy
Hve7lpxa9i4Oo9Vf2Pd7
=5FKf
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot


Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/2] cmd:gpt: randomly generate each partition uuid if undefined

2014-03-03 Thread Przemyslaw Marczak

Hello Tom,

On 03/03/2014 03:13 PM, Tom Rini wrote:

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On 03/03/2014 08:45 AM, Przemyslaw Marczak wrote:

[snip]

Actually automatically generated uuids was the main purpose of this
patches. Setting each env variable in this place was the most easy way
to make this without a lot of duplicated code.

Why do you treat it like a side-effect?
If user wants have own generated uuids - then he can manually set env
variables like uuid_gpt_disk.
This actually is not changed - when uuid env is set then it will be used
like in current version of code.
When user can't generate uuids or just wants to have it automatically
generated then my code do this job.


Having been using this code again myself recently, at the high level,
this is useful.  Having to copy/paste in N UUIDs gets silly.  But I also
wonder..

[snip]

The one and only reason for put saveenv() here was that if uuids are
randomly generated or even just are in environment then I can be sure
that next gpt write (e.g. in case of overwrite sector 0 by mistake) is
using the same uuids values.


Is this really an important use case to cover?



It can be important if somebody uses UUIDS to boot kernel. In kernel 
documentation you can find a notice about kernel function 
name_to_dev_t() - so by command line you can pass uuid for root 
partition. And the same is for arg suspend in kernel cmd line.



The way I see things, would it be possible (and not a pain) to make the
UUID part of the partition string passed to 'gpt write' optional.  If
not passed, generate the UUIDs needed.  What was used would be seen in
'part list' and so forth.

- --
Tom


Ok, so I remove saveenv() from my changes and then we will have two cases:

# gpt write mmc 0 $partitions
case 1: envorinment uuids are not set; then:
  proper uuids variables are set automatically (and printed)
case 2: environment uuids are set in env (e.g. some user has put his own 
env); then

  users uuids will be used and new uuids are not generated automatically

So this will not change current gpt usability - just add new feature, 
moreover user will be informed about each uuid generation.
In case when someone use gpt write by mistake and overwrite uuids by 
randomly generated then he can easily back to his own uuids by setting 
each in environment and run gpt write again.



-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
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=5FKf
-END PGP SIGNATURE-



Thank you,
--
Przemyslaw Marczak
Samsung RD Institute Poland
Samsung Electronics
p.marc...@samsung.com
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot


Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/2] cmd:gpt: randomly generate each partition uuid if undefined

2014-03-03 Thread Tom Rini
On Mon, Mar 03, 2014 at 04:31:35PM +0100, Przemyslaw Marczak wrote:
 Hello Tom,
 
 On 03/03/2014 03:13 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
 -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
 Hash: SHA1
 
 On 03/03/2014 08:45 AM, Przemyslaw Marczak wrote:
 
 [snip]
 Actually automatically generated uuids was the main purpose of this
 patches. Setting each env variable in this place was the most easy way
 to make this without a lot of duplicated code.
 
 Why do you treat it like a side-effect?
 If user wants have own generated uuids - then he can manually set env
 variables like uuid_gpt_disk.
 This actually is not changed - when uuid env is set then it will be used
 like in current version of code.
 When user can't generate uuids or just wants to have it automatically
 generated then my code do this job.
 
 Having been using this code again myself recently, at the high level,
 this is useful.  Having to copy/paste in N UUIDs gets silly.  But I also
 wonder..
 
 [snip]
 The one and only reason for put saveenv() here was that if uuids are
 randomly generated or even just are in environment then I can be sure
 that next gpt write (e.g. in case of overwrite sector 0 by mistake) is
 using the same uuids values.
 
 Is this really an important use case to cover?
 
 It can be important if somebody uses UUIDS to boot kernel. In kernel
 documentation you can find a notice about kernel function
 name_to_dev_t() - so by command line you can pass uuid for root
 partition. And the same is for arg suspend in kernel cmd line.

Right.  But that seems to be putting things in the wrong order.  If you
need to restore UUIDs to your partition table, you pass in the optional
and already known UUID.  If you're starting from scratch, by the time
the installer is run U-Boot is long gone.  And tying things back to the
commodity distro stuff, we would be fetching 'root=UUID=...' from some
file generated and controlled on the Linux side of things anyhow.  To be
clear, on the OS side of the equation there's much better ways to find
out that partition1 has a UUID of ... than poking the U-Boot
environment.

 The way I see things, would it be possible (and not a pain) to make the
 UUID part of the partition string passed to 'gpt write' optional.  If
 not passed, generate the UUIDs needed.  What was used would be seen in
 'part list' and so forth.
 
 Ok, so I remove saveenv() from my changes and then we will have two cases:
 
 # gpt write mmc 0 $partitions
 case 1: envorinment uuids are not set; then:
   proper uuids variables are set automatically (and printed)

I'd go so far as to say we don't need to print the uuids, they're
available via 'part list ...'.  A notice that we're generating UUIDs is
probably not too spammy.

 case 2: environment uuids are set in env (e.g. some user has put his
 own env); then
   users uuids will be used and new uuids are not generated automatically
 
 So this will not change current gpt usability - just add new
 feature, moreover user will be informed about each uuid generation.
 In case when someone use gpt write by mistake and overwrite uuids by
 randomly generated then he can easily back to his own uuids by
 setting each in environment and run gpt write again.

Right.  We're making the use case of fresh device, create new table
easier and we're still allowing existing device, re-establish old
UUIDs.

-- 
Tom


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot


Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/2] cmd:gpt: randomly generate each partition uuid if undefined

2014-03-03 Thread Przemyslaw Marczak

On 03/03/2014 05:46 PM, Tom Rini wrote:

On Mon, Mar 03, 2014 at 04:31:35PM +0100, Przemyslaw Marczak wrote:

Hello Tom,

On 03/03/2014 03:13 PM, Tom Rini wrote:

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On 03/03/2014 08:45 AM, Przemyslaw Marczak wrote:

[snip]

Actually automatically generated uuids was the main purpose of this
patches. Setting each env variable in this place was the most easy way
to make this without a lot of duplicated code.

Why do you treat it like a side-effect?
If user wants have own generated uuids - then he can manually set env
variables like uuid_gpt_disk.
This actually is not changed - when uuid env is set then it will be used
like in current version of code.
When user can't generate uuids or just wants to have it automatically
generated then my code do this job.


Having been using this code again myself recently, at the high level,
this is useful.  Having to copy/paste in N UUIDs gets silly.  But I also
wonder..

[snip]

The one and only reason for put saveenv() here was that if uuids are
randomly generated or even just are in environment then I can be sure
that next gpt write (e.g. in case of overwrite sector 0 by mistake) is
using the same uuids values.


Is this really an important use case to cover?


It can be important if somebody uses UUIDS to boot kernel. In kernel
documentation you can find a notice about kernel function
name_to_dev_t() - so by command line you can pass uuid for root
partition. And the same is for arg suspend in kernel cmd line.


Right.  But that seems to be putting things in the wrong order.  If you
need to restore UUIDs to your partition table, you pass in the optional
and already known UUID.  If you're starting from scratch, by the time
the installer is run U-Boot is long gone.  And tying things back to the
commodity distro stuff, we would be fetching 'root=UUID=...' from some
file generated and controlled on the Linux side of things anyhow.  To be
clear, on the OS side of the equation there's much better ways to find
out that partition1 has a UUID of ... than poking the U-Boot
environment.



Ok, I understand this.


The way I see things, would it be possible (and not a pain) to make the
UUID part of the partition string passed to 'gpt write' optional.  If
not passed, generate the UUIDs needed.  What was used would be seen in
'part list' and so forth.


Ok, so I remove saveenv() from my changes and then we will have two cases:

# gpt write mmc 0 $partitions
case 1: envorinment uuids are not set; then:
   proper uuids variables are set automatically (and printed)


I'd go so far as to say we don't need to print the uuids, they're
available via 'part list ...'.  A notice that we're generating UUIDs is
probably not too spammy.



Ok, I will remove this notice.


case 2: environment uuids are set in env (e.g. some user has put his
own env); then
   users uuids will be used and new uuids are not generated automatically

So this will not change current gpt usability - just add new
feature, moreover user will be informed about each uuid generation.
In case when someone use gpt write by mistake and overwrite uuids by
randomly generated then he can easily back to his own uuids by
setting each in environment and run gpt write again.


Right.  We're making the use case of fresh device, create new table
easier and we're still allowing existing device, re-establish old
UUIDs.


That's the point.




___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot



Thanks,
--
Przemyslaw Marczak
Samsung RD Institute Poland
Samsung Electronics
p.marc...@samsung.com
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot


Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/2] cmd:gpt: randomly generate each partition uuid if undefined

2014-03-03 Thread Tom Rini
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On 03/03/2014 12:23 PM, Przemyslaw Marczak wrote:
 On 03/03/2014 05:46 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
 On Mon, Mar 03, 2014 at 04:31:35PM +0100, Przemyslaw Marczak wrote:
 Hello Tom,

 On 03/03/2014 03:13 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
 -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
 Hash: SHA1

 On 03/03/2014 08:45 AM, Przemyslaw Marczak wrote:

 [snip]
 Actually automatically generated uuids was the main purpose of this
 patches. Setting each env variable in this place was the most easy way
 to make this without a lot of duplicated code.

 Why do you treat it like a side-effect?
 If user wants have own generated uuids - then he can manually set env
 variables like uuid_gpt_disk.
 This actually is not changed - when uuid env is set then it will be
 used
 like in current version of code.
 When user can't generate uuids or just wants to have it automatically
 generated then my code do this job.

 Having been using this code again myself recently, at the high level,
 this is useful.  Having to copy/paste in N UUIDs gets silly.  But I
 also
 wonder..

 [snip]
 The one and only reason for put saveenv() here was that if uuids are
 randomly generated or even just are in environment then I can be sure
 that next gpt write (e.g. in case of overwrite sector 0 by mistake) is
 using the same uuids values.

 Is this really an important use case to cover?

 It can be important if somebody uses UUIDS to boot kernel. In kernel
 documentation you can find a notice about kernel function
 name_to_dev_t() - so by command line you can pass uuid for root
 partition. And the same is for arg suspend in kernel cmd line.

 Right.  But that seems to be putting things in the wrong order.  If you
 need to restore UUIDs to your partition table, you pass in the optional
 and already known UUID.  If you're starting from scratch, by the time
 the installer is run U-Boot is long gone.  And tying things back to the
 commodity distro stuff, we would be fetching 'root=UUID=...' from some
 file generated and controlled on the Linux side of things anyhow.  To be
 clear, on the OS side of the equation there's much better ways to find
 out that partition1 has a UUID of ... than poking the U-Boot
 environment.

 
 Ok, I understand this.
 
 The way I see things, would it be possible (and not a pain) to make the
 UUID part of the partition string passed to 'gpt write' optional.  If
 not passed, generate the UUIDs needed.  What was used would be seen in
 'part list' and so forth.

 Ok, so I remove saveenv() from my changes and then we will have two
 cases:

 # gpt write mmc 0 $partitions
 case 1: envorinment uuids are not set; then:
proper uuids variables are set automatically (and printed)

 I'd go so far as to say we don't need to print the uuids, they're
 available via 'part list ...'.  A notice that we're generating UUIDs is
 probably not too spammy.

 
 Ok, I will remove this notice.
 
 case 2: environment uuids are set in env (e.g. some user has put his
 own env); then
users uuids will be used and new uuids are not generated
 automatically

 So this will not change current gpt usability - just add new
 feature, moreover user will be informed about each uuid generation.
 In case when someone use gpt write by mistake and overwrite uuids by
 randomly generated then he can easily back to his own uuids by
 setting each in environment and run gpt write again.

 Right.  We're making the use case of fresh device, create new table
 easier and we're still allowing existing device, re-establish old
 UUIDs.

 That's the point.

Yay for agreement then, even if it took a few rounds to see we're on the
same side :)  I look forward to v2.

- -- 
Tom
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
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=eGvG
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot


Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/2] cmd:gpt: randomly generate each partition uuid if undefined

2014-03-03 Thread Przemyslaw Marczak

On 03/03/2014 06:35 PM, Tom Rini wrote:

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On 03/03/2014 12:23 PM, Przemyslaw Marczak wrote:

On 03/03/2014 05:46 PM, Tom Rini wrote:

On Mon, Mar 03, 2014 at 04:31:35PM +0100, Przemyslaw Marczak wrote:

Hello Tom,

On 03/03/2014 03:13 PM, Tom Rini wrote:

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On 03/03/2014 08:45 AM, Przemyslaw Marczak wrote:

[snip]

Actually automatically generated uuids was the main purpose of this
patches. Setting each env variable in this place was the most easy way
to make this without a lot of duplicated code.

Why do you treat it like a side-effect?
If user wants have own generated uuids - then he can manually set env
variables like uuid_gpt_disk.
This actually is not changed - when uuid env is set then it will be
used
like in current version of code.
When user can't generate uuids or just wants to have it automatically
generated then my code do this job.


Having been using this code again myself recently, at the high level,
this is useful.  Having to copy/paste in N UUIDs gets silly.  But I
also
wonder..

[snip]

The one and only reason for put saveenv() here was that if uuids are
randomly generated or even just are in environment then I can be sure
that next gpt write (e.g. in case of overwrite sector 0 by mistake) is
using the same uuids values.


Is this really an important use case to cover?


It can be important if somebody uses UUIDS to boot kernel. In kernel
documentation you can find a notice about kernel function
name_to_dev_t() - so by command line you can pass uuid for root
partition. And the same is for arg suspend in kernel cmd line.


Right.  But that seems to be putting things in the wrong order.  If you
need to restore UUIDs to your partition table, you pass in the optional
and already known UUID.  If you're starting from scratch, by the time
the installer is run U-Boot is long gone.  And tying things back to the
commodity distro stuff, we would be fetching 'root=UUID=...' from some
file generated and controlled on the Linux side of things anyhow.  To be
clear, on the OS side of the equation there's much better ways to find
out that partition1 has a UUID of ... than poking the U-Boot
environment.



Ok, I understand this.


The way I see things, would it be possible (and not a pain) to make the
UUID part of the partition string passed to 'gpt write' optional.  If
not passed, generate the UUIDs needed.  What was used would be seen in
'part list' and so forth.


Ok, so I remove saveenv() from my changes and then we will have two
cases:

# gpt write mmc 0 $partitions
case 1: envorinment uuids are not set; then:
proper uuids variables are set automatically (and printed)


I'd go so far as to say we don't need to print the uuids, they're
available via 'part list ...'.  A notice that we're generating UUIDs is
probably not too spammy.



Ok, I will remove this notice.


case 2: environment uuids are set in env (e.g. some user has put his
own env); then
users uuids will be used and new uuids are not generated
automatically

So this will not change current gpt usability - just add new
feature, moreover user will be informed about each uuid generation.
In case when someone use gpt write by mistake and overwrite uuids by
randomly generated then he can easily back to his own uuids by
setting each in environment and run gpt write again.


Right.  We're making the use case of fresh device, create new table
easier and we're still allowing existing device, re-establish old
UUIDs.


That's the point.


Yay for agreement then, even if it took a few rounds to see we're on the
same side :)  I look forward to v2.

- --
Tom
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
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=eGvG
-END PGP SIGNATURE-



I hope to send V2 tomorrow :)
Regards
--
Przemyslaw Marczak
Samsung RD Institute Poland
Samsung Electronics
p.marc...@samsung.com
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot


Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/2] cmd:gpt: randomly generate each partition uuid if undefined

2014-02-28 Thread Stephen Warren
On 02/28/2014 08:18 AM, Przemyslaw Marczak wrote:
 Changes:
 - randomly generate each partition uuid if undefined
 - print info about generated uuid
 - save environment on gpt write success
 - update doc/README.gpt

 diff --git a/common/cmd_gpt.c b/common/cmd_gpt.c

  static char extract_env(const char *str, char **env)
  {
 + int ret = -1;

Why does the function return char not int? At least the type of ret
should match the return type of the function.

There's no need to introduce a ret variable anyway; just don't delete
the return statements that are already in the function.

 @@ -43,16 +44,23 @@ static char extract_env(const char *str, char **env)
   memset(s + strlen(s) - 1, '\0', 1);
   memmove(s, s + 2, strlen(s) - 1);
   e = getenv(s);
 - free(s);
   if (e == NULL) {
 - printf(Environmental '%s' not set\n, str);
 - return -1; /* env not set */
 + printf(%s unset. , str);
 + e = get_uuid_str();
 + if (e) {
 + printf(Setting to: %s\n, e);
 + setenv(s, e);

Why should the environment variable be set? I rather dislike commands
that randomly set environment variables as an implicit side-effect.

It'd be far better if this function simply wasn't modified, but rather
the user was provided with a function to explicitly set an environment
variable to a randomly generated GPT. That way the user/script would be
in control. Something like:

$ gen_random_uuid env_var_name

 @@ -299,8 +307,17 @@ static int do_gpt(cmd_tbl_t *cmdtp, int flag, int argc, 
 char * const argv[])
   return CMD_RET_FAILURE;
   }
  
 - if (gpt_default(blk_dev_desc, argv[4]))
 + puts(Writing GPT: );
 +
 + ret = gpt_default(blk_dev_desc, argv[4]);
 + if (!ret) {
 + puts(success!\n);
 + saveenv();

Uggh. Definitely don't save the environment behind the user's back.
There is no reason to believe that's safe. What if the user had added
some temporary changes to their environment that they didn't want saved?
This kind of logic belongs in scripts, not code.

___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot