Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v5] mpc83xx: New board support for SIMPC8313
On Thu, 22 Jan 2009 15:05:24 -0800 Ron Madrid ron_mad...@sbcglobal.net wrote: +ENTRY(_start) +ASSERT(_end = 0xfff01000, NAND bootstrap too big); Ron, the above gets asserted when building for large page nand with a gcc 4.1.2 based toolchain: [...@beaut u-boot (next)]$ ./MAKEALL SIMPC8313_SP ...Small Page NAND...Configuring for SIMPC8313 board... textdata bss dec hex filename 250704 20964 28472 300140 4946c ./u-boot [...@beaut u-boot (next)]$ ./MAKEALL SIMPC8313_LP ...Large Page NAND...Configuring for SIMPC8313 board... ld: NAND bootstrap too big ld: NAND bootstrap too big make[1]: *** [/home/kim/git/u-boot/nand_spl/u-boot-spl] Error 1 make: *** [nand_spl] Error 2 make: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs size: './u-boot': No such file Kim ___ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v5] mpc83xx: New board support for SIMPC8313
--- On Fri, 1/23/09, Kim Phillips kim.phill...@freescale.com wrote: From: Kim Phillips kim.phill...@freescale.com Subject: Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v5] mpc83xx: New board support for SIMPC8313 To: Ron Madrid ron_mad...@sbcglobal.net Cc: u-boot@lists.denx.de Date: Friday, January 23, 2009, 12:36 PM On Thu, 22 Jan 2009 15:05:24 -0800 Ron Madrid ron_mad...@sbcglobal.net wrote: +ENTRY(_start) +ASSERT(_end = 0xfff01000, NAND bootstrap too big); Ron, the above gets asserted when building for large page nand with a gcc 4.1.2 based toolchain: Please forgive my ignorance, but how can I go about fixing this? How do I determine my toolchain and how can I use the same one you are referring to? Are there any documents that can point me in the right direction? Also, this seems strange that they should have different sizes when being built as they have always been identical sizes for my builds. But I'll determine the reason for this soon. Ron ___ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v5] mpc83xx: New board support for SIMPC8313
On Fri, 23 Jan 2009 13:29:03 -0800 (PST) Ron Madrid ron_mad...@sbcglobal.net wrote: --- On Fri, 1/23/09, Kim Phillips kim.phill...@freescale.com wrote: From: Kim Phillips kim.phill...@freescale.com Subject: Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v5] mpc83xx: New board support for SIMPC8313 To: Ron Madrid ron_mad...@sbcglobal.net Cc: u-boot@lists.denx.de Date: Friday, January 23, 2009, 12:36 PM On Thu, 22 Jan 2009 15:05:24 -0800 Ron Madrid ron_mad...@sbcglobal.net wrote: +ENTRY(_start) +ASSERT(_end = 0xfff01000, NAND bootstrap too big); Ron, the above gets asserted when building for large page nand with a gcc 4.1.2 based toolchain: Please forgive my ignorance, but how can I go about fixing this? How do I determine my toolchain and how can I use the same one you are referring to? Are there any documents that can point me in the right direction? I'm just using what Fedora brought to me on my G5 box (native compiler). I still use it because it's close to what the ELDK version is (or used to be - I can't immediately tell which version the ELDK is using right now). Where/when did you get your toolchain? Also, this seems strange that they should have different sizes when being built as they have always been identical sizes for my builds. But I'll determine the reason for this soon. this is true; if it helps, I tried playing with the LP's PAD_TO value to no avail... Kim ___ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v5] mpc83xx: New board support for SIMPC8313
--- On Fri, 1/23/09, Kim Phillips kim.phill...@freescale.com wrote: +ENTRY(_start) +ASSERT(_end = 0xfff01000, NAND bootstrap too big); Ron, the above gets asserted when building for large page nand with a gcc 4.1.2 based toolchain: Please forgive my ignorance, but how can I go about fixing this? How do I determine my toolchain and how can I use the same one you are referring to? Are there any documents that can point me in the right direction? I'm just using what Fedora brought to me on my G5 box (native compiler). I still use it because it's close to what the ELDK version is (or used to be - I can't immediately tell which version the ELDK is using right now). Where/when did you get your toolchain? I am using the one that came with FC4. I'm guessing that I should go ahead an update my gcc. I'm in the middle of doing that. I'll get back to you if I discover anything and then of course I'll resubmit. Also, this seems strange that they should have different sizes when being built as they have always been identical sizes for my builds. But I'll determine the reason for this soon. this is true; if it helps, I tried playing with the LP's PAD_TO value to no avail... Thanks for the info. Ron ___ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v5] mpc83xx: New board support for SIMPC8313
--- On Fri, 1/23/09, Ron Madrid ron_mad...@sbcglobal.net wrote: From: Ron Madrid ron_mad...@sbcglobal.net Subject: Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v5] mpc83xx: New board support for SIMPC8313 To: Kim Phillips kim.phill...@freescale.com Cc: u-boot@lists.denx.de Date: Friday, January 23, 2009, 2:29 PM --- On Fri, 1/23/09, Kim Phillips kim.phill...@freescale.com wrote: +ENTRY(_start) +ASSERT(_end = 0xfff01000, NAND bootstrap too big); Ron, the above gets asserted when building for large page nand with a gcc 4.1.2 based toolchain: Please forgive my ignorance, but how can I go about fixing this? How do I determine my toolchain and how can I use the same one you are referring to? Are there any documents that can point me in the right direction? I'm just using what Fedora brought to me on my G5 box (native compiler). I still use it because it's close to what the ELDK version is (or used to be - I can't immediately tell which version the ELDK is using right now). Where/when did you get your toolchain? I am using the one that came with FC4. I'm guessing that I should go ahead an update my gcc. I'm in the middle of doing that. I'll get back to you if I discover anything and then of course I'll resubmit. I upgraded my gcc and did not see any difference in the builds. I'm not sure where to go from here. Ron ___ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v5] mpc83xx: New board support for SIMPC8313
On Fri, 23 Jan 2009 15:36:40 -0800 (PST) Ron Madrid ron_mad...@sbcglobal.net wrote: --- On Fri, 1/23/09, Ron Madrid ron_mad...@sbcglobal.net wrote: From: Ron Madrid ron_mad...@sbcglobal.net Subject: Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v5] mpc83xx: New board support for SIMPC8313 To: Kim Phillips kim.phill...@freescale.com Cc: u-boot@lists.denx.de Date: Friday, January 23, 2009, 2:29 PM --- On Fri, 1/23/09, Kim Phillips kim.phill...@freescale.com wrote: +ENTRY(_start) +ASSERT(_end = 0xfff01000, NAND bootstrap too big); Ron, the above gets asserted when building for large page nand with a gcc 4.1.2 based toolchain: Please forgive my ignorance, but how can I go about fixing this? How do I determine my toolchain and how can I use the same one you are referring to? Are there any documents that can point me in the right direction? I'm just using what Fedora brought to me on my G5 box (native compiler). I still use it because it's close to what the ELDK version is (or used to be - I can't immediately tell which version the ELDK is using right now). Where/when did you get your toolchain? I am using the one that came with FC4. I'm guessing that I should go ahead an update my gcc. I'm in the middle of doing that. I'll get back to you if I discover anything and then of course I'll resubmit. I upgraded my gcc and did not see any difference in the builds. I'm not sure where to go from here. me neither. I know it works with gcc 4.2, just not gcc 4.1, and I don't know what version the ELDK currently uses. I'll just take it since it's so early in the cycle, and WD seems to be overtaking me in 83xx patches anyway ;). I expect the issue to be fixed before the next release though. Kim ___ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v5] mpc83xx: New board support for SIMPC8313
Dear Kim Phillips, In message 20090123175552.3f60db0b.kim.phill...@freescale.com you wrote: me neither. I know it works with gcc 4.2, just not gcc 4.1, and I don't know what version the ELDK currently uses. I'll just take it since it's so early in the cycle, and WD seems to be overtaking me in 83xx patches anyway ;). I expect the issue to be fixed before the next release though. ELDK uses: ELDK 4.0: gcc version 4.0.0 ELDK 4.1: gcc version 4.0.0 ELDK 4.2: gcc version 4.2.2 Best regards, Wolfgang Denk -- DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk Detlev Zundel HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: w...@denx.de I can't understand it. I can't even understand the people who can understand it.- Queen Juliana of the Netherlands. ___ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v5] mpc83xx: New board support for SIMPC8313
On Sat, 24 Jan 2009 02:14:16 +0100 Wolfgang Denk w...@denx.de wrote: In message 20090123175552.3f60db0b.kim.phill...@freescale.com you wrote: me neither. I know it works with gcc 4.2, just not gcc 4.1, and I don't know what version the ELDK currently uses. I'll just take it since it's so early in the cycle, and WD seems to be overtaking me in 83xx patches anyway ;). I expect the issue to be fixed before the next release though. ELDK uses: ELDK 4.0: gcc version 4.0.0 ELDK 4.1: gcc version 4.0.0 ELDK 4.2: gcc version 4.2.2 great, then all should be ok. Thank you Wolfgang, Kim ___ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
