[U-Boot-Users] UBOOT port to i.MX27ADS - NAND issues

2008-10-31 Thread Tiju
Hi Sascha,

The Nand port to imx27ads is booting when I use a Samsung device (128MiB, 3.3V, 
8-bit, 512page).

Now my requirement is to boot from a Micron device (256MiB, 3.3V, 8-bit, 2k 
page). Part num: MT29F2G08AAD

I modified the line in imx27ads.c to

imx_nand_load_image((void *)TEXT_BASE, 256 * 1024, 2048, (2048 * 64)); //256MB, 
2K

Q Is this correct?

I have also commented some lines in nand_get_flash_type which checks the 
Manf./device ID again!

Once modified, I loaded the image to the RAM location 0xa7f0 and executed. 
I get the following output.

**
U-Boot 2.0.0-rc5-git (Oct 31 2008 - 09:03:01)

Board: Freescale i.MX27 ADS
cfi_probe: cfi_flash base: 0xc000 size: 0x0200
NAND device: Manufacturer ID: 0x2c, Chip ID: 0xda (Micron NAND 256MiB 3,3V 
8-bit)
Scanning device for bad blocks
Using environment in NAND Flash
chip id: [1,882,1,01d]
mpll: 398999390 Hz
spll: 23725 Hz
arm:  398999390 Hz
perclk1:   2910 Hz
perclk2:   26599959 Hz
perclk3:   66499898 Hz
perclk4:   26599959 Hz
clkin26:   2600 Hz
ahb:  132999796 Hz
ipg:   66499898 Hz
Malloc space: 0xa7b0 - 0xa7f0 (size  4 MB)
Stack space : 0xa7af8000 - 0xa7b0 (size 32 kB)
envfs: wrong magic on /dev/env0
no valid environment found on /dev/env0. Using default environment
running /env/bin/init...
Usage:
  adds a partition table to a device

Hit any key to stop autoboot:  3

type update_kernel [imagename] to update kernel into flash
type udate_root [imagename] to update rootfs into flash

uboot:/
**

But once I program the uboot image to the micron flash, nothing seems to appear 
on the UART. I am using the Ronetix PEEDI JTAG programmer.

1. Is there anything/anywhere else I should modify the uboot code for the 
micron nand flash to boot?
2. How can I reduce the frequency of operation through uboot?
3. If I do single stepping, it seems that the first 2k data is being copied 
successfully from the SRAM to the DDR. But if I execute/give a go nothing 
appears on the UART, but PC=0x0004.
4. How can I introduce more delay between each NAND operation?
5. How do I enable the DEBUG functions in uboot? or how do I start debuging 
from this point onwards?

Help on these are very much appreciated.

Thank You,
Tiju



  Did you know? You can CHAT without downloading messenger. Go to 
http://in.webmessenger.yahoo.com/


-
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK  win great prizes
Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100url=/
___
U-Boot-Users mailing list
U-Boot-Users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/u-boot-users


Re: [U-Boot-Users] UBOOT port to i.MX27ADS - NAND issues

2008-10-31 Thread Sascha Hauer
Hi,

On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 03:05:14PM +0530, Tiju wrote:
 Hi Sascha,
 
 The Nand port to imx27ads is booting when I use a Samsung device (128MiB, 
 3.3V, 8-bit, 512page).

Great! Care to send patches? That would help answering further questions
aswell.

 
 Now my requirement is to boot from a Micron device (256MiB, 3.3V, 8-bit, 2k 
 page). Part num: MT29F2G08AAD
 
 I modified the line in imx27ads.c to
 
 imx_nand_load_image((void *)TEXT_BASE, 256 * 1024, 2048, (2048 * 64)); 
 //256MB, 2K

I don't know your NAND chip, so I can't say anything about the block
size, but otherwiese it looks correct.

 
 Q Is this correct?
 
 I have also commented some lines in nand_get_flash_type which checks the 
 Manf./device ID again!
 
 Once modified, I loaded the image to the RAM location 0xa7f0 and 
 executed. I get the following output.
 
 **
 U-Boot 2.0.0-rc5-git (Oct 31 2008 - 09:03:01)
 
 Board: Freescale i.MX27 ADS
 cfi_probe: cfi_flash base: 0xc000 size: 0x0200
 NAND device: Manufacturer ID: 0x2c, Chip ID: 0xda (Micron NAND 256MiB 3,3V 
 8-bit)
 Scanning device for bad blocks
 Using environment in NAND Flash
 chip id: [1,882,1,01d]
 mpll: 398999390 Hz
 spll: 23725 Hz
 arm:  398999390 Hz
 perclk1:   2910 Hz
 perclk2:   26599959 Hz
 perclk3:   66499898 Hz
 perclk4:   26599959 Hz
 clkin26:   2600 Hz
 ahb:  132999796 Hz
 ipg:   66499898 Hz
 Malloc space: 0xa7b0 - 0xa7f0 (size  4 MB)
 Stack space : 0xa7af8000 - 0xa7b0 (size 32 kB)
 envfs: wrong magic on /dev/env0
 no valid environment found on /dev/env0. Using default environment
 running /env/bin/init...
 Usage:
   adds a partition table to a device
 
 Hit any key to stop autoboot:  3
 
 type update_kernel [imagename] to update kernel into flash
 type udate_root [imagename] to update rootfs into flash
 
 uboot:/

Can you access the NAND device? Before trying to boot from the device
should make sure that it works using normal U-Boot commands.

 **
 
 But once I program the uboot image to the micron flash, nothing seems to 
 appear on the UART. I am using the Ronetix PEEDI JTAG programmer.
 
 1. Is there anything/anywhere else I should modify the uboot code for the 
 micron nand flash to boot?

I think not, but then again, it would work, right?

 2. How can I reduce the frequency of operation through uboot?

No.

 3. If I do single stepping, it seems that the first 2k data is being copied 
 successfully from the SRAM to the DDR. But if I execute/give a go nothing 
 appears on the UART, but PC=0x0004.

Place a breakpoint after the first 2k are copied and single step
further.

 4. How can I introduce more delay between each NAND operation?

You don't have udelay in this stage, so your only chance is to insert
busy loops.

Regards,
  Sascha

-- 
 Pengutronix - Linux Solutions for Science and Industry
   Handelsregister:  Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686
 Hannoversche Str. 2, 31134 Hildesheim, Germany
   Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |  Fax: +49-5121-206917-9

-
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK  win great prizes
Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100url=/
___
U-Boot-Users mailing list
U-Boot-Users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/u-boot-users


Re: [U-Boot-Users] UBOOT port to i.MX27ADS - NAND issues

2008-10-31 Thread Nishanth Menon
On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 7:57 AM, Sascha Hauer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Now my requirement is to boot from a Micron device (256MiB, 3.3V, 8-bit, 2k 
 page). Part num: MT29F2G08AAD
we used a similar part on beagleboard[1], and there is a related reset
requirement which was posted to u-boot-v1 patch[2].

 4. How can I introduce more delay between each NAND operation?

 You don't have udelay in this stage, so your only chance is to insert
 busy loops.
chip_delay should handle the same, however ideally you dont need to do
anything at all, mtd layer will be smart enough to handle the same.
Regards,
Nishanth Menon
Ref:
[1] http://beagleboard.org
[2] http://www.nabble.com/-U-Boot--Pull-request%3A-nand-flash-to20236313.html

-
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK  win great prizes
Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100url=/
___
U-Boot-Users mailing list
U-Boot-Users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/u-boot-users


Re: [U-Boot-Users] UBOOT port to i.MX27ADS - NAND issues

2008-10-31 Thread Robert Schwebel
On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 07:35:42PM +0530, Tiju wrote:
  Great! Care to send patches? That would help answering further
  questions as well..
 
 Sorry, I know its a basic question but how do I make a patch file?
 Else I can send you the file I modified.

It's basically

diff -u old-file.c new-file.c

Bug you should probably read this:

http://lxr.linux.no/linux/Documentation/SubmittingPatches

rsc
-- 
 Dipl.-Ing. Robert Schwebel | http://www.pengutronix.de
 Pengutronix - Linux Solutions for Science and Industry
   Handelsregister:  Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686
 Hannoversche Str. 2, 31134 Hildesheim, Germany
   Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |  Fax: +49-5121-206917-9


-
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK  win great prizes
Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100url=/
___
U-Boot-Users mailing list
U-Boot-Users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/u-boot-users


Re: [U-Boot-Users] UBOOT port to i.MX27ADS - NAND issues

2008-10-31 Thread Tiju
Hi Sascha,


  
  The Nand port to imx27ads is booting when I use a Samsung device (128MiB, 
 3.3V, 8-bit, 512page).
 
 Great! Care to send patches? That would help answering further questions
 as well..

Sorry, I know its a basic question but how do I make a patch file? Else I can 
send you the file I modified.

  Now my requirement is to boot from a Micron device (256MiB, 3.3V, 8-bit, 2k 
 page). Part num: MT29F2G08AAD
  
  I modified the line in imx27ads.c to
  
  imx_nand_load_image((void *)TEXT_BASE, 256 * 1024, 2048, (2048 * 64)); 
 //256MB, 2K
 
 I don't know your NAND chip, so I can't say anything about the block
 size, but otherwiese it looks correct.

Thanks. I have verified that the block size is correct.

 Can you access the NAND device? Before trying to boot from the device
 should make sure that it works using normal U-Boot commands.

The only command related to the nand flash when I type help is nand. Could 
you please tell me some commands to read and write the nand that would work 
from the uboot prompt? Where could I find more info on this?

  But once I program the uboot image to the micron flash, nothing seems to 
 appear on the UART. I am using the Ronetix PEEDI JTAG programmer.
  
  1. Is there anything/anywhere else I should modify the uboot code for the 
 micron nand flash to boot?
 
 I think not, but then again, it would work, right?

I went through the code and could find only this to be modified. I am worried 
weather there are any timing related differences between the samsung and the 
micron.

 
  2. How can I reduce the frequency of operation through uboot?
 
 No.
You mean the frequency cannot be reduced?
 
  3. If I do single stepping, it seems that the first 2k data is being copied 
 successfully from the SRAM to the DDR. But if I execute/give a go nothing 
 appears on the UART, but PC=0x0004.
 
 Place a breakpoint after the first 2k are copied and single step
 further.

It looks if I single step all the 2K bytes are copied to DDR. But if I just 
execute, in the 2K everything copies except the first 512bytes.

Regards,
Tiju



  Connect with friends all over the world. Get Yahoo! India Messenger at 
http://in.messenger.yahoo.com/?wm=n/


-
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK  win great prizes
Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100url=/
___
U-Boot-Users mailing list
U-Boot-Users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/u-boot-users


Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH 04/10 v2] [ARM] TQMA31: add new board with i.MX31 processor

2008-10-31 Thread Jens Gehrlein
Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD schrieb:
 On 11:33 Tue 08 Jul , Jens Gehrlein wrote:
 Signed-off-by: Jens Gehrlein [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 ---

 Fixed two bugs:
 a) added NFS mount option rw to default environment
 b) added prefix $(obj) in front of .depend in Makefile. Thank you Magnus for 
 catching that.


  MAINTAINERS   |4 
  MAKEALL   |1 
  Makefile  |3 
  board/tqc/tqma31/Makefile |   48 
  board/tqc/tqma31/config.mk|2 
  board/tqc/tqma31/lowlevel_init.S  |  375 
 +
  board/tqc/tqma31/tqma31.c |   95 
  board/tqc/tqma31/u-boot.lds   |   72 ++
  include/asm-arm/arch-mx31/mx31-regs.h |   42 
  include/configs/TQMA31.h  |  271 
  10 files changed, 913 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
  create mode 100644 board/tqc/tqma31/Makefile
  create mode 100644 board/tqc/tqma31/config.mk
  create mode 100644 board/tqc/tqma31/lowlevel_init.S
  create mode 100644 board/tqc/tqma31/tqma31.c
  create mode 100644 board/tqc/tqma31/u-boot.lds
  create mode 100644 include/configs/TQMA31.h
 
 Do you have any plan to send a rebase patch?

I suppose in Q1/2009. It depends on our customer and on
my workload with other projects.

But could you possibly consider
[U-Boot-Users] [PATCH 01/10 v2] [ARM] MXC: insert bus busy check in 
i2c_probe from 2008-07-08 04:20 PM ?
IMO it's independent of the other patches.

Thank you for asking.

It's curious: always, when replying to your e-mails, my e-mail address
appears in the To field instead of your address.
Do the others have this problem, too? (Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 on Linux)

-- 
Kind regards,
Jens

-
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK  win great prizes
Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100url=/
___
U-Boot-Users mailing list
U-Boot-Users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/u-boot-users


Re: [U-Boot-Users] UBOOT port to i.MX27ADS - NAND issues

2008-10-31 Thread Sascha Hauer
On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 07:35:42PM +0530, Tiju wrote:
 Hi Sascha,
 
 
   
   The Nand port to imx27ads is booting when I use a Samsung device (128MiB, 
  3.3V, 8-bit, 512page).
  
  Great! Care to send patches? That would help answering further questions
  as well..
 
 Sorry, I know its a basic question but how do I make a patch file? Else I can 
 send you the file I modified.
 
   Now my requirement is to boot from a Micron device (256MiB, 3.3V, 8-bit, 
   2k 
  page). Part num: MT29F2G08AAD
   
   I modified the line in imx27ads.c to
   
   imx_nand_load_image((void *)TEXT_BASE, 256 * 1024, 2048, (2048 * 64)); 
  //256MB, 2K
  
  I don't know your NAND chip, so I can't say anything about the block
  size, but otherwiese it looks correct.
 
 Thanks. I have verified that the block size is correct.
 
  Can you access the NAND device? Before trying to boot from the device
  should make sure that it works using normal U-Boot commands.
 
 The only command related to the nand flash when I type help is nand. Could 
 you please tell me some commands to read and write the nand that would work 
 from the uboot prompt? Where could I find more info on this?

Well the trick is that There are no other commands for nand. When the NAND
device is initialized you should have a /dev/nand0. From there on you
can partition the device using addpart, for example like this:

addpart /dev/nand0 256k(uboot),256k(ubootenv),2M(kernel),-(root)

This gives you the partition devices /dev/nand0.uboot and so on. You
then add bad block aware devices ontop of these partitions:

nand -a /dev/nand0.*

You can use the standard commands like erase / cp / md on these devices.

 
   But once I program the uboot image to the micron flash, nothing seems to 
  appear on the UART. I am using the Ronetix PEEDI JTAG programmer.
   
   1. Is there anything/anywhere else I should modify the uboot code for the 
  micron nand flash to boot?
  
  I think not, but then again, it would work, right?
 
 I went through the code and could find only this to be modified. I am worried 
 weather there are any timing related differences between the samsung and the 
 micron.
 
  
   2. How can I reduce the frequency of operation through uboot?
  
  No.
 You mean the frequency cannot be reduced?

Oh, I overread the 'how'. No, it cannot be reduced through U-Boot
commands. You either have to adjust a lower frequency in the startup
code or add a command that does the trick for you.

  
   3. If I do single stepping, it seems that the first 2k data is being 
   copied 
  successfully from the SRAM to the DDR. But if I execute/give a go nothing 
  appears on the UART, but PC=0x0004.
  
  Place a breakpoint after the first 2k are copied and single step
  further.
 
 It looks if I single step all the 2K bytes are copied to DDR. But if I just 
 execute, in the 2K everything copies except the first 512bytes.

Sorry, I'm afraid I can't help you here without access to the hardware.
But it will give some hints if you can verify that the NAND is working
in general under U-Boot (or under Linux, which basically is the same
driver)

Regards,
  Sascha
-- 
 Pengutronix - Linux Solutions for Science and Industry
   Handelsregister:  Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686
 Hannoversche Str. 2, 31134 Hildesheim, Germany
   Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |  Fax: +49-5121-206917-9

-
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK  win great prizes
Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100url=/
___
U-Boot-Users mailing list
U-Boot-Users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/u-boot-users


Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH 04/10 v2] [ARM] TQMA31: add new board with i.MX31 processor

2008-10-31 Thread Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
On 16:29 Fri 31 Oct , Jens Gehrlein wrote:
 Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD schrieb:
 On 11:33 Tue 08 Jul , Jens Gehrlein wrote:
 Signed-off-by: Jens Gehrlein [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 ---

 Fixed two bugs:
 a) added NFS mount option rw to default environment
 b) added prefix $(obj) in front of .depend in Makefile. Thank you Magnus 
 for catching that.


  MAINTAINERS   |4  MAKEALL
|1  Makefile  |3  
 board/tqc/tqma31/Makefile |   48 
  board/tqc/tqma31/config.mk|2  
 board/tqc/tqma31/lowlevel_init.S  |  375 
 +
  board/tqc/tqma31/tqma31.c |   95 
  board/tqc/tqma31/u-boot.lds   |   72 ++
  include/asm-arm/arch-mx31/mx31-regs.h |   42 
  include/configs/TQMA31.h  |  271 
  10 files changed, 913 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
  create mode 100644 board/tqc/tqma31/Makefile
  create mode 100644 board/tqc/tqma31/config.mk
  create mode 100644 board/tqc/tqma31/lowlevel_init.S
  create mode 100644 board/tqc/tqma31/tqma31.c
  create mode 100644 board/tqc/tqma31/u-boot.lds
  create mode 100644 include/configs/TQMA31.h

 Do you have any plan to send a rebase patch?

 I suppose in Q1/2009. It depends on our customer and on
 my workload with other projects.

 But could you possibly consider
 [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH 01/10 v2] [ARM] MXC: insert bus busy check in  
 i2c_probe from 2008-07-08 04:20 PM ?
 IMO it's independent of the other patches.

is it the only one?
 Thank you for asking.

 It's curious: always, when replying to your e-mails, my e-mail address
 appears in the To field instead of your address.
 Do the others have this problem, too? (Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 on Linux)
I use mutt and I receve the e-mail with your e-mail address as sender

Best Regards,
J.

-
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK  win great prizes
Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100url=/
___
U-Boot-Users mailing list
U-Boot-Users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/u-boot-users


Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH 04/10 v2] [ARM] TQMA31: add new board with i.MX31 processor

2008-10-31 Thread Magnus Lilja
 It's curious: always, when replying to your e-mails, my e-mail address
 appears in the To field instead of your address.
 Do the others have this problem, too? (Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 on Linux)
 I use mutt and I receve the e-mail with your e-mail address as sender

I have the same problem when replying to Jean-Christphe's replies. For
some reason the reply-to field is set when JC posts a reply and I
suppose that messes up Thunderbird/gmail etc.

As an example, the email I'm replying to now has reply-to: set to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Follow ups from other people don't have the reply-to: field. So my
guess is that JC's mutt adds that.

Regards, Magnus

-
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK  win great prizes
Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100url=/
___
U-Boot-Users mailing list
U-Boot-Users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/u-boot-users


Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH 04/10 v2] [ARM] TQMA31: add new board with i.MX31 processor

2008-10-31 Thread Ben Warren
Magnus Lilja wrote:
 It's curious: always, when replying to your e-mails, my e-mail address
 appears in the To field instead of your address.
 Do the others have this problem, too? (Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 on Linux)
   
 I use mutt and I receve the e-mail with your e-mail address as sender
 

 I have the same problem when replying to Jean-Christphe's replies. For
 some reason the reply-to field is set when JC posts a reply and I
 suppose that messes up Thunderbird/gmail etc.

 As an example, the email I'm replying to now has reply-to: set to
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] and [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 Follow ups from other people don't have the reply-to: field. So my
 guess is that JC's mutt adds that.

 Regards, Magnus


   
I noticed the same thing when doing a reply-all to one of JC's e-mails.  
It put my address in 'To'.  I using Thunderbird with IMAP connection to 
Gmail.  I've seen with both Windows and Linux versions of Thunderbird.

regards,
Ben

-
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK  win great prizes
Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100url=/
___
U-Boot-Users mailing list
U-Boot-Users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/u-boot-users


Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH 04/10 v2] [ARM] TQMA31: add new board with i.MX31 processor

2008-10-31 Thread Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
On 10:10 Fri 31 Oct , Ben Warren wrote:
 Magnus Lilja wrote:
 It's curious: always, when replying to your e-mails, my e-mail address
 appears in the To field instead of your address.
 Do the others have this problem, too? (Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 on Linux)
   
 I use mutt and I receve the e-mail with your e-mail address as sender
 

 I have the same problem when replying to Jean-Christphe's replies. For
 some reason the reply-to field is set when JC posts a reply and I
 suppose that messes up Thunderbird/gmail etc.

 As an example, the email I'm replying to now has reply-to: set to
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] and [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 Follow ups from other people don't have the reply-to: field. So my
 guess is that JC's mutt adds that.

   
 I noticed the same thing when doing a reply-all to one of JC's e-mails.   
 It put my address in 'To'.  I using Thunderbird with IMAP connection to  
 Gmail.  I've seen with both Windows and Linux versions of Thunderbird.


I do nothing special in mutt I just use it for several years

and it's the first time some one report me this problem

If someone known why please tell us

Best Regards,
J.

-
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK  win great prizes
Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100url=/
___
U-Boot-Users mailing list
U-Boot-Users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/u-boot-users