RE: [U2] Access to IBM knowledgebase for in-house developers
I use the IBM site all the time for Lotus Notes/Domino related information. They have forums and tech notes etc. and none of these are password protected. Incidently I have an IBM ID and password that I received ages ago as a Lotus Notes Business Partner. That password allows me to see the UniVerse (and presumably Unidata) tech notes. Why not become a Lotus Notes business partner (I'm sure it's free) and then U2 could access the knowledge base?! Incidently, I'm a firm believer that keeping knowledge to yourself in order to try and retain power or control is ultimately flawed and that sharing knowledge is usually a WIN WIN. If your VAR doesn't agree, you could always vote with your feet. Regards, Rob Wills (rob dot wills at tigerinfotech dot com) Stevenson, Charles [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 13/11/2006 06:33:56: Yes, now it's easy, except for pages that get moved around so bookmarks fail, login confusion that Deb already noted. But that's a separate issue. (I wonder if the other IBM user groups are complaining about that.) --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
RE: [U2] Access to IBM knowledgebase for in-house developers
Wellthat might be believable with the excepton being that the majority portion of IBM hasn't a clue as to what U2 is... It's not just U2 sadly though, AS400 hasn't a clue about RS6000, and worse with RS6000 not fully understanding those items that can overlay it, ... It's a prime example of vertical (rather than horizontal) training at its worst.. ~ Debster Anyone can hold the helm when the sea is calm. -Syrus Publilius www.infinite-systems.net -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of phil walker Sent: Sunday, November 12, 2006 5:57 PM To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: RE: [U2] Access to IBM knowledgebase for in-house developers Conspiracy Theory: Maybe IBM does not want a future MV environment, maybe they hope everyone will go to DB2...if so, then I hope it works. I think more likely they would go to Microsoft, where information is readily available. ;-) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brian Leach Sent: Monday, 13 November 2006 6:45 a.m. To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: RE: [U2] Access to IBM knowledgebase for in-house developers Exactly ! A good knowledge flow opens people's eyes and creates opportunities. And it's not just an end user issue. Without knowledge flow where will the next generation of vars come from? Who will bring new blood and investment? How will we encourage developers into our market ? How much more difficult are we making it to sell mv based solutions to end users by obscuring the full potential of what they are buying ? How many times have mv-invested companies resorted to other solutions because they didn't unow that their existing systems had the capabilities to deliver what they needed all along? It is in all our interests - users, vars, consultants - to raise and keep fresh the profile of this technology. That begins by making sure people out there can understand what it can achieve for them. I remember an speech years ago by a mv vendor proudly saying that 80% of his business was repeat business. He saw that as customer care. I saw it as lack of outreach. Who was right? Brian -Original Message- From: Ken Wallis[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 11/11/06 23:42:25 To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.orgu2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: RE: [U2] Access to IBM knowledgebase for in-house developers Chuck Stevenson wrote: Interestingly, guys like me don't care, because vars like Strategy Seven are nice to us. It would be end users with curmudgeonly vars that would need a user group to make this end run. I still think someone who cares should submit a U2UG enhancement request and others should second it. Otherwise IBM only hears about you through the very var who is blocking you. And the odd thing is that it is VARs like S7 who make money from their generic skills in the database platforms rather than from working in specific vertical markets with their applications. You would have thought S7 were the sort of VAR who might consider themselves in danger of losing revenue by working to get this information out. Clearly, however, they must realise that access to information helps users understand what is possible and want to make use of the technology. Cheers, Ken --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
[U2] RE: U2 Users Digest V1 #1394
I believe the more documentation is open to the public the better. Look at the large Microsoft site with free training on SQL Server 2005. Free downloads and tons of help, examples and product documentation. If IBM is really committed to marketing MV solutions then it is in everyone's best interest that MV become public. They do not teach MV technology in college. Many MV shops find it difficult to hire programmers and many MV programmers feel that skill is not very marketable. After twelve years of MV programming, I find a lot of MV programmers I worked with have changed to other skill sets or are changing skills to VB.NET and/or Java so that they will have jobs in the future. Sincerely, Diane Boyd MV Programmer -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, November 13, 2006 3:05 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: U2 Users Digest V1 #1394 U2 Users Digest Monday, November 13 2006 Volume 01 : Number 1394 In this issue: RE: [U2] Access to IBM knowledgebase for in-house developers RE: [U2] Access to IBM knowledgebase for in-house developers Re: [U2] Access to IBM knowledgebase for in-house developers RE: [U2] Access to IBM knowledgebase for in-house developers RE: [U2] Access to IBM knowledgebase for in-house developers RE: [U2] Access to IBM knowledgebase for in-house developers -- Date: Sun, 12 Nov 2006 17:11:13 - From: Brian Leach [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [U2] Access to IBM knowledgebase for in-house developers Exactly ! A good knowledge flow opens people's eyes and creates opportunities. And it's not just an end user issue. Without knowledge flow where will the next generation of vars come from? Who will bring new blood and investment? How will we encourage developers into our market ? How much more difficult are we making it to sell mv based solutions to end users by obscuring the full potential of what they are buying ? How many times have mv-invested companies resorted to other solutions because they didn't unow that their existing systems had the capabilities to deliver what they needed all along? It is in all our interests - users, vars, consultants - to raise and keep fresh the profile of this technology. That begins by making sure people out there can understand what it can achieve for them. I remember an speech years ago by a mv vendor proudly saying that 80% of his business was repeat business. He saw that as customer care. I saw it as lack of outreach. Who was right? Brian - -Original Message- From: Ken Wallis[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 11/11/06 23:42:25 To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.orgu2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: RE: [U2] Access to IBM knowledgebase for in-house developers Chuck Stevenson wrote: Interestingly, guys like me don't care, because vars like Strategy Seven are nice to us. It would be end users with curmudgeonly vars that would need a user group to make this end run. I still think someone who cares should submit a U2UG enhancement request and others should second it. Otherwise IBM only hears about you through the very var who is blocking you. And the odd thing is that it is VARs like S7 who make money from their generic skills in the database platforms rather than from working in specific vertical markets with their applications. You would have thought S7 were the sort of VAR who might consider themselves in danger of losing revenue by working to get this information out. Clearly, however, they must realise that access to information helps users understand what is possible and want to make use of the technology. Cheers, Ken --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ -- Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2006 11:57:06 +1300 From: phil walker [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [U2] Access to IBM knowledgebase for in-house developers Conspiracy Theory: Maybe IBM does not want a future MV environment, maybe they hope everyone will go to DB2...if so, then I hope it works. I think more likely they would go to Microsoft, where information is readily available. ;-) - -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brian Leach Sent: Monday, 13 November 2006 6:45 a.m. To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: RE: [U2] Access to IBM knowledgebase for in-house developers Exactly ! A good knowledge flow opens people's eyes and creates opportunities. And it's not just an end user issue. Without knowledge flow where will the next generation of vars come from? Who will bring new blood and investment? How will we encourage developers into our market ? How much more difficult are we making it to sell mv based solutions to end
RE: [U2] [UV] - defunct processes
Hi Debbie Nice to hear from you. I got me a 'real' job down here in Tampa. Thanks for the pointers. Our sysadmin (as usual) does not know UniVerse so there's a lot of blind leading the blind going on. The cross-platform termination sounds plausible but the name of the parent process (bin/usd /usr/opt/uv/spool/uv) seems to indicate that it is something to do with print jobs. Our development box uses UV.NET to share some files with production. That is not an issue where the production box does not use UV.NET for the same files. I'm just not sure how to identify the source of these processes. It's one of those situations where nobody really knows what is causing the problem and so no-one (including me grin ) wants to take ownership. I'm just hoping I can find some sort of clue to help figure out where to start looking. Cheers JR -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:owner-u2- [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Debster Sent: Friday, November 10, 2006 9:06 PM To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: RE: [U2] [UV] - defunct processes Hey John!! I have found Bad disconnect on telnet sessions (especially those dreaded closing X ) Branching out to NFS shares AIX it was coupled with Samba (users file not properly maintained) Check emulator settings Issues with phantom processes Check cross-platform processing terminations Debra A. Fedchin ~~ H: 732.698.0499 C: 732.233.3088 www.infinite-systems.net Anyone can hold the helm when the sea is calm. -Syrus Publilius -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of John Rodgers Sent: Friday, November 10, 2006 8:37 AM To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: [U2] [UV] - defunct processes UniVerse 9.6.1.6 on HP-UX We have a mystery on our development box which causes it to crash (about weekly). $ ps -ef Shows a lot (and I mean, A LOT) of lines like these: root 18105 20014 1 18:57:34 ? 0:00 defunct root 21633 20014 0 20:25:35 ? 0:00 defunct root 18553 20014 0 19:05:34 ? 0:00 defunct root 20014 1 0 Nov 6 ? 0:53 bin/usd /usr/opt/uv/spool/uv the 20014 seems to be the parent. This does not happen on our production platform which is curious because it should be a pretty close replication of our production environment. We think these are hangovers from print jobs initiated by the scheduler ? but that is as close as anyone has come to identifying the culprit. This seems to be a weekly phenomenon and we are investigating the scheduler contents. Does anyone have any ideas where these might come from ? Cheers JR --- --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
RE: RE: [U2] Access to IBM knowledgebase for in-house developers
Sorry but I'm going to stand up and defend IBM (for once - grin). IBM *have* moved the U2 products forward over the last year or so. There was a time when for many winters we didn't see significant development on the U2 platforms themselves, but the additions of XML, web services, data encryption and similar features - well, if IBM didn't want a future MV environment they *could* have just sat on the products and not enhanced them. And attitudes at IBM seem to have changed over the past year or so. Two years ago it was all DB2, DB2, DB2. Now they seem to have people in place who realize that U2 makes money and that it should be supported. Now it's up to us to do our bit in getting the word out. Brian Conspiracy Theory: Maybe IBM does not want a future MV environment, maybe they hope everyone will go to DB2...if so, then I hope it works. I think more likely they would go to Microsoft, where information is readily available. ;-) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brian Leach Sent: Monday, 13 November 2006 6:45 a.m. To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: RE: [U2] Access to IBM knowledgebase for in-house developers Exactly ! A good knowledge flow opens people's eyes and creates opportunities. And it's not just an end user issue. Without knowledge flow where will the next generation of vars come from? Who will bring new blood and investment? How will we encourage developers into our market ? How much more difficult are we making it to sell mv based solutions to end users by obscuring the full potential of what they are buying ? How many times have mv-invested companies resorted to other solutions because they didn't unow that their existing systems had the capabilities to deliver what they needed all along? It is in all our interests - users, vars, consultants - to raise and keep fresh the profile of this technology. That begins by making sure people out there can understand what it can achieve for them. I remember an speech years ago by a mv vendor proudly saying that 80% of his business was repeat business. He saw that as customer care. I saw it as lack of outreach. Who was right? Brian -Original Message- From: Ken Wallis[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 11/11/06 23:42:25 To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.orgu2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: RE: [U2] Access to IBM knowledgebase for in-house developers Chuck Stevenson wrote: Interestingly, guys like me don't care, because vars like Strategy Seven are nice to us. It would be end users with curmudgeonly vars that would need a user group to make this end run. I still think someone who cares should submit a U2UG enhancement request and others should second it. Otherwise IBM only hears about you through the very var who is blocking you. And the odd thing is that it is VARs like S7 who make money from their generic skills in the database platforms rather than from working in specific vertical markets with their applications. You would have thought S7 were the sort of VAR who might consider themselves in danger of losing revenue by working to get this information out. Clearly, however, they must realise that access to information helps users understand what is possible and want to make use of the technology. Cheers, Ken --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
RE: [U2] Slow uniobjects connections
Marc, Is the 'slow' speed compared to a uniobjects connection made some other way? Tom -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Marc Hilbert Sent: Thursday, November 09, 2006 6:12 PM To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: [U2] Slow uniobjects connections Good evening, We are experiencing very slow uniobjects (one second to connect) connections from a DLL which is called from an ASP server aplication. (W2K, UV 10.1). Does anyone have any experience to share regarding this? Thanks in advance, Marc --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
[U2] OT:Universe Credit Cards
Hello Everyone, I know this issue has come up before and I guess I cleaned out my office a little too good. I lost some responses that I had saved. Anyway, I am looking to possibly replace our credit card processing solution. We are currently using a DataCap LanTran system. It is stand alone and for the most part works without a problem. However, when there is a problem the support is the worst - the guy is excellent, but spread too thin. Especially for a retailer who is very dependent on being able to process credit cards. I have seen a company mentioned before that has a set of routines that can be called from Universe basic to process transactions. Would someone be willing to share this again ? Im not sure that I would go that route, but should I consider it. Does anyone have experience with a good credit card solution that has rock solid 24x7 support (well, we close at 10pm EST) ? Thanks Anthony --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
Re: [U2] OT:Universe Credit Cards
Nebula RD has software to do that. Contact Tony: http://www.nebula-rnd.com/ -- Charles Barouch [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Consulting [EMAIL PROTECTED] - ETL/Migration/Integration (718) 762-3884x1 Anthony Dzikiewicz wrote: | Hello Everyone, | | I know this issue has come up before and I guess I cleaned out my office | a little too good. I lost some responses that I had saved. Anyway, I | am looking to possibly replace our credit card processing solution. We | are currently using a DataCap LanTran system. It is stand alone and for | the most part works without a problem. However, when there is a problem | the support is the worst - the guy is excellent, but spread too thin. | Especially for a retailer who is very dependent on being able to process | credit cards. I have seen a company mentioned before that has a set of | routines that can be called from Universe basic to process transactions. | Would someone be willing to share this again ? Im not sure that I would | go that route, but should I consider it. Does anyone have experience | with a good credit card solution that has rock solid 24x7 support (well, | we close at 10pm EST) ? | Thanks | Anthony | --- | u2-users mailing list | u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org | To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ | --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
RE: [U2] OT:Universe Credit Cards
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Anthony Dzikiewicz Sent: Monday, November 13, 2006 10:58 AM To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: [U2] OT:Universe Credit Cards Hello Everyone, I know this issue has come up before and I guess I cleaned out my office a little too good. I lost some responses that I had saved. Anyway, I am looking to possibly replace our credit card processing solution. We went through this about a year ago, and ended up going with a non-Pick specific solution. We're using Payflow Pro from PayPal (formerly Verisign). It uses an XML web service, and the implementation was relatively trivial. We just assemble an XML request in UV, then feed it to PayPal's Payflow executable via a basic EXECUTE SH. The executable sends the request to the web service and returns an XML response. We have a login to their site that lets us view all of our transactions and print reports. -John --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
[U2] [AD] Job Opening With Related Skills [/AD]
REPOSTED WITHOUT ENDORSEMENT: [EMAIL PROTECTED] I'm a *Technical Recruiter* with Magna Systems Inc (*MSI*); while browsing the internet for highly talented IT professionals I came across your profile, and would like to check your availability and interest for the following opportunity. If you are interested in this opportunity, then please reply to this email with your latest resume (as word attachment). *Position Title: AIX ADMINISTRATOR* Location: *Ann Arbor**, MI*** Duration: *6+ Months* ** *_Required Skills:_* 7 Day to day duties and responsibilities: focal for TSM issues. 7 Fair amount of AIX admin work. 7 Will be involved in AIX projects, maintenance TSM projects updating libraries, tape drives, upgrading the TSM server codes, client codes. 7 Migrating to newer version of TSM or newer hardware or upgrading AIX hardware. *_Must have:_* 7 TSM admin at least 3-5 years (they are on 5.2 and we are going to upgrade to 5.3 so I would like to see past experience doing upgrades) 7 AIX admin (4.33-5.3) 7 Experience with LPAR/DLPAR *_ _* *_Nice to have:_* 7 LPAR /or DLPAR 7 Linux 7 SAN Thanks and have a wonderful day, **Paul Kv*** *Technical Recruiter Magna Systems Intl Inc Ph: 248-721-4100 *102 [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] www.magna-systems.com http://www.magna-systems.com **Celebrating 10 years of IT Consulting Success (1996-2006) *About MAGNA:* MAGNA Systems is an IT staffing and BPO services firm with 300+ employees globally and provides full-service Systems development, integration, staff augmentation, TM services and offshore projects development. MAGNA specializes in CRM, ERP, e-Commerce, m-Commerce, Networks and Custom Programming Solutions...for more info please visit: www.magna-systems.com http://www.magna-systems.com. Why join Magna Systems: | Established full service IT firm with solid client base. | Dedicated Account Manager to market your skills. | Faster placements through our automated marketing tools. | High paying long term contracts with our established clients/partners. | Flexible and generous compensation plans - salaried or hourly. | Referral bonus plan / Incentive awards and programs. | Cross training of employees in niche technologies / tools (if needed). | Immediate initiation of Green Card process for right candidates (if needed) *Note:* This email is not intended to be a solicitation. It is targeted at recruiting consulting professionals. If you have received this email in error, please accept our apologies and click on Remove http://www.magna-systems.com/CTS/RemoveMe.htm and type your email id to be removed from our mailing list **or** reply to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word REMOVE in the SUBJECT line. We regret any inconvenience caused to you and thank you for your valuable time. -- Charles Barouch ([EMAIL PROTECTED] or [EMAIL PROTECTED]) www.KeyAlly.com (718) 762-3884 x 1 P. O. Box 540957, Queens, NY 11354 --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
Re: [U2] OT:Universe Credit Cards
Are you doing point-of-sale or are you looking for a company to do billing of credit cards for you? Jerry - Original Message - From: Anthony Dzikiewicz [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Sent: Monday, November 13, 2006 12:58 PM Subject: [U2] OT:Universe Credit Cards Hello Everyone, I know this issue has come up before and I guess I cleaned out my office a little too good. I lost some responses that I had saved. Anyway, I am looking to possibly replace our credit card processing solution. We are currently using a DataCap LanTran system. It is stand alone and for the most part works without a problem. However, when there is a problem the support is the worst - the guy is excellent, but spread too thin. Especially for a retailer who is very dependent on being able to process credit cards. I have seen a company mentioned before that has a set of routines that can be called from Universe basic to process transactions. Would someone be willing to share this again ? Im not sure that I would go that route, but should I consider it. Does anyone have experience with a good credit card solution that has rock solid 24x7 support (well, we close at 10pm EST) ? Thanks Anthony --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
RE: [U2] OT:Universe Credit Cards
It is point of sale and we accept debit cards. We are currently on a batch or specifically 'not host based' system. We send a settlement file at the end of the night. This is not good when accepting debit cards in general. In the event that the batch gets clobbered, you dont have the ability to reenter the debit cards. If you have a host based system then the transactions reside there and not on my machines. I like this better. It off loads some responsibility (from my limited staff) to not have these worries. Anthony -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of jpb Sent: Monday, November 13, 2006 5:44 PM To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: Re: [U2] OT:Universe Credit Cards Are you doing point-of-sale or are you looking for a company to do billing of credit cards for you? Jerry - Original Message - From: Anthony Dzikiewicz [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Sent: Monday, November 13, 2006 12:58 PM Subject: [U2] OT:Universe Credit Cards Hello Everyone, I know this issue has come up before and I guess I cleaned out my office a little too good. I lost some responses that I had saved. Anyway, I am looking to possibly replace our credit card processing solution. We are currently using a DataCap LanTran system. It is stand alone and for the most part works without a problem. However, when there is a problem the support is the worst - the guy is excellent, but spread too thin. Especially for a retailer who is very dependent on being able to process credit cards. I have seen a company mentioned before that has a set of routines that can be called from Universe basic to process transactions. Would someone be willing to share this again ? Im not sure that I would go that route, but should I consider it. Does anyone have experience with a good credit card solution that has rock solid 24x7 support (well, we close at 10pm EST) ? Thanks Anthony --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ -- No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.1.409 / Virus Database: 268.14.5/533 - Release Date: 11/13/2006 -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.1.409 / Virus Database: 268.14.5/533 - Release Date: 11/13/2006 --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
Re: [U2] [UV] Access Violation on Windows 2003
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], David Jordan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes We used Windows Copy, xcopy and did a backup and restore and none of them resolved the problem xcopy /h (if the h is missing, then files like .type30 don't get copied ...) Regards David Jordan Managing Consultant Cheers, Wol -- Anthony W. Youngman [EMAIL PROTECTED] 'Yings, yow graley yin! Suz ae rikt dheu,' said the blue man, taking the thimble. 'What *is* he?' said Magrat. 'They're gnomes,' said Nanny. The man lowered the thimble. 'Pictsies!' Carpe Jugulum, Terry Pratchett 1998 Visit the MaVerick web-site - http://www.maverick-dbms.org Open Source Pick --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
[U2] Re: U2 Users Digest V1 #1395
Hello: I'll be on vacation from Monday 11/13 through Friday 11/17, and I will not be checking e-mail during this time. If you have an urgent support issue, please page your primary technical support representative directly. Thank you! --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
RE: [U2] OT:Universe Credit Cards
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Anthony Dzikiewicz Sent: Monday, November 13, 2006 10:58 AM To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: [U2] OT:Universe Credit Cards Hello Everyone, I know this issue has come up before and I guess I cleaned out my office a little too good. I lost some responses that I had saved. Anyway, I am looking to possibly replace our credit card processing solution. I should have also mentioned in my original reply, I've got a relatively short UV basic testing program (about 80 lines) that connects to a dummy version of the Payflow Pro web service for initial testing. I'd be happy to send it to you off-list if you're interested. You'll need to get a login and password from PayPal to actually test it out, but seeing the UV code may give you an idea of what would be involved in integrating it into your application. -John --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
RE: [U2] [UV] - defunct processes
Yeah...something is probably weird with the configuration connecting the network printers. I had the same type of situation at a site in Wilkes-Barre PA. What I did was change the cron kickoff of the day end procedure to shut everything down and then restart everything, including restarting the printers prior to processing. This would kick everyone off, and clear any print jobs that hung. This happens alot if you use form queues set up to handle specialized printing along with funky print drivers (flipping from raw, pcl and pdf) Another culprit could be that there are printers assigned that are no longer active or changed, so check what printers are listed when checking uv.restart. Be forewarnedI had it become so bad sucking up sessions that there were memory issues making it difficult to restart uv! Glad to hear you settled in. As for me, I'm doing a 90 day try and buy at a spot where I did a JDE install as a Project manager...now I'm cleaning up crappy data, and re-engineering such simple things as validating addresses! Maybe even bringing them into this decade by utilizing something other than odbc (bleh!) Could it be uniobjects? intercall? brush the C cobwebs from my brain? Hopefully I'll return to my former status before the holidays... Debster ~~ www.infinite-systems.net Anyone can hold the helm when the sea is calm. -Syrus Publilius Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of John Rodgers Sent: Monday, November 13, 2006 9:44 AM To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: RE: [U2] [UV] - defunct processes Hi Debbie Nice to hear from you. I got me a 'real' job down here in Tampa. Thanks for the pointers. Our sysadmin (as usual) does not know UniVerse so there's a lot of blind leading the blind going on. The cross-platform termination sounds plausible but the name of the parent process (bin/usd /usr/opt/uv/spool/uv) seems to indicate that it is something to do with print jobs. Our development box uses UV.NET to share some files with production. That is not an issue where the production box does not use UV.NET for the same files. I'm just not sure how to identify the source of these processes. It's one of those situations where nobody really knows what is causing the problem and so no-one (including me grin ) wants to take ownership. I'm just hoping I can find some sort of clue to help figure out where to start looking. Cheers JR -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:owner-u2- [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Debster Sent: Friday, November 10, 2006 9:06 PM To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: RE: [U2] [UV] - defunct processes Hey John!! I have found Bad disconnect on telnet sessions (especially those dreaded closing X ) Branching out to NFS shares AIX it was coupled with Samba (users file not properly maintained) Check emulator settings Issues with phantom processes Check cross-platform processing terminations Debra A. Fedchin ~~ H: 732.698.0499 C: 732.233.3088 www.infinite-systems.net Anyone can hold the helm when the sea is calm. -Syrus Publilius -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of John Rodgers Sent: Friday, November 10, 2006 8:37 AM To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: [U2] [UV] - defunct processes UniVerse 9.6.1.6 on HP-UX We have a mystery on our development box which causes it to crash (about weekly). $ ps -ef Shows a lot (and I mean, A LOT) of lines like these: root 18105 20014 1 18:57:34 ? 0:00 defunct root 21633 20014 0 20:25:35 ? 0:00 defunct root 18553 20014 0 19:05:34 ? 0:00 defunct root 20014 1 0 Nov 6 ? 0:53 bin/usd /usr/opt/uv/spool/uv the 20014 seems to be the parent. This does not happen on our production platform which is curious because it should be a pretty close replication of our production environment. We think these are hangovers from print jobs initiated by the scheduler ? but that is as close as anyone has come to identifying the culprit. This seems to be a weekly phenomenon and we are investigating the scheduler contents. Does anyone have any ideas where these might come from ? Cheers JR --- --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
