Re: [U2] Compiling for immediate user access
It'd also vote for FIBCDFN but ... I'm not certain it flushes the global catalog space; I believe it only flushes the local catalog memory, does it not? The HELP NEWPCODE states: The NEWPCODE command is effective only in the udt session from which it is executed. However, the help message continues: You do not need to execute NEWPCODE if you globally catalog a program because globally cataloging notifies the shared memory server that a new version is available. So if you're cataloging DIRECT, seems you might be in a pickle. On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 11:25 AM, Trevor Fulton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Yes, > > use FIBCDFN in AE > > You can set up additional options which are used for SE via /GC.PARAMS > > From TCL you can use NEWPCODE as a stand alone verb (Unidata) > > > Trevor. > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jonathan Leckie > Sent: 31 March 2008 17:00 > To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org > Subject: [U2] Compiling for immediate user access > > Good Day! > > Is there a way when a programme is compiled to force all new users to > use the new version, we normally either compile from AE using FIBCDF, or > press F8 from the SE editor. > > > * This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by > > * Blairs Email Server, and is believed to be clean. > * > > * This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and > * intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they > * are addressed. > * > * If you have received this email in error please notify us at Blairs > * via email at [EMAIL PROTECTED] > * > * Name & Registered Office: > * -- > * Blairs Limited > * 9 Baker Street > * Greenock > * PA15 4TU > * Company No: SC132926 > * VAT No: 554698690 > > --- > u2-users mailing list > u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org > To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ > > > Epicor Software (UK) is a limited company registered in England & Wales. > Registration Number: 2338274. Registered Office: Osborne Clarke OWA, > One London Wall, London EC2Y 5EB. > This e-mail is for the use of the intended recipient(s) only. If you have > received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and then > delete it. If you are not the intended recipient, you must not use, disclose > or distribute this e-mail without the author's prior permission. We have > taken precautions to minimize the risk of transmitting software viruses, but > we advise you to carry out your own virus checks on any attachment to this > message. We cannot accept liability for any loss or damage caused by > software viruses. Any views and/or opinions expressed in this e-mail are of > the author only and do not represent the views of Epicor Software (UK) > Limited or any other company within its group > --- > u2-users mailing list > u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org > To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ > -- -Kevin http://www.PrecisOnline.com --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
Re: [U2] problem starting PE71
Go into the Windows Services app and start the Unidata service. On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 7:32 PM, Bruce McAdoo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Installed unidata PE7.1, tryimg to start unidata, udt.exe, receive the > following messages: > > RFS is not licensed. SB_FLAG is turned off. Start SMM first! > > Any help to resolve would be greatly appreciated. > --- > u2-users mailing list > u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org > To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ > -- -Kevin http://www.PrecisOnline.com --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
[U2] problem starting PE71
Installed unidata PE7.1, tryimg to start unidata, udt.exe, receive the following messages: RFS is not licensed. SB_FLAG is turned off. Start SMM first! Any help to resolve would be greatly appreciated. --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
RE: [U2] VISTA and U2 Tools
Hi Brenda Universe as a database needs to be Rel 10.2 to run on vista. I have run the latest versions of Wintegrate and dynamic connect and they work alright. Uniadmin and webtools has a slight incompatibility with the screen resolution, and Vista down scales resolution to cope. You may have to run some applications as administrator to make them work. Also look out for some VB6 applications may stop working. Be careful of the VPN gotcha. Vista does not support MSCHAP1 and many VPN/routers do not support MSCHAP2, hence vpn does not work in some cases. Regards David Jordan --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
[U2] David Peters/Denver/IBM is out of the office.
I will be out of the office starting 03/31/2008 and will not return until 04/05/2008. I am traveling on business and will have limited access to email. --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
RE: [U2] Compiling for immediate user access
Yes, use FIBCDFN in AE You can set up additional options which are used for SE via /GC.PARAMS >From TCL you can use NEWPCODE as a stand alone verb (Unidata) Trevor. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jonathan Leckie Sent: 31 March 2008 17:00 To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: [U2] Compiling for immediate user access Good Day! Is there a way when a programme is compiled to force all new users to use the new version, we normally either compile from AE using FIBCDF, or press F8 from the SE editor. * This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by * Blairs Email Server, and is believed to be clean. * * This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and * intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they * are addressed. * * If you have received this email in error please notify us at Blairs * via email at [EMAIL PROTECTED] * * Name & Registered Office: * -- * Blairs Limited * 9 Baker Street * Greenock * PA15 4TU * Company No: SC132926 * VAT No: 554698690 --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ Epicor Software (UK) is a limited company registered in England & Wales. Registration Number: 2338274. Registered Office: Osborne Clarke OWA, One London Wall, London EC2Y 5EB. This e-mail is for the use of the intended recipient(s) only. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and then delete it. If you are not the intended recipient, you must not use, disclose or distribute this e-mail without the author's prior permission. We have taken precautions to minimize the risk of transmitting software viruses, but we advise you to carry out your own virus checks on any attachment to this message. We cannot accept liability for any loss or damage caused by software viruses. Any views and/or opinions expressed in this e-mail are of the author only and do not represent the views of Epicor Software (UK) Limited or any other company within its group --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
RE: [U2] Compiling for immediate user access
We use VOC. ed VOC MY.PROGRAM 0001: PA 0002: RUN BP MY.PROGRAM.R14 When releasing rev 15 of this program, just bump-up the R number in VOC. It is prudent to insure that new revisions of programs compile properly first so as not to whack users. I wrote a little change control program that helps to keep track of changes. I suppose that I could send it if there is interest. --Bill -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Jonathan Leckie Sent: Monday, March 31, 2008 11:00 AM To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: [U2] Compiling for immediate user access Good Day! Is there a way when a programme is compiled to force all new users to use the new version, we normally either compile from AE using FIBCDF, or press F8 from the SE editor. * This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by * Blairs Email Server, and is believed to be clean. * * This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and * intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they * are addressed. * * If you have received this email in error please notify us at Blairs * via email at [EMAIL PROTECTED] * * Name & Registered Office: * -- * Blairs Limited * 9 Baker Street * Greenock * PA15 4TU * Company No: SC132926 * VAT No: 554698690 --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
RE: [U2] VISTA and U2 Tools
Does it have to be Ultimate or can it be Business? Jerry Banker Senior Programmer Analyst IBM Certified Solutions Expert > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:owner-u2- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brutzman, Bill > Sent: Monday, March 31, 2008 11:34 AM > To: 'u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org' > Subject: RE: [U2] VISTA and U2 Tools > > Dynamic Connect v5.1.2, wIntegrate v6.0, and UniAdmin v1.3.1 all work > well > with Vista Ultimate with no issued uncovered at all. > > --Bill > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Brenda Price > Sent: Monday, March 31, 2008 8:53 AM > To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org > Subject: [U2] VISTA and U2 Tools > > > We are getting new PC's soon and they will be coming with VISTA. Has > anyone had any problems running U2 Tools, UniAdmin, UniObjects, etc on > VISTA? > > > > Brenda L Price > > Senior Programmer Analyst > > Affiliated Acceptance Corporation > > Sunrise Beach, MO > > (800)233-8483 > --- > u2-users mailing list > u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org > To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ > --- > u2-users mailing list > u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org > To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
[U2] Compiling for immediate user access
Good Day! Is there a way when a programme is compiled to force all new users to use the new version, we normally either compile from AE using FIBCDF, or press F8 from the SE editor. * This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by * Blairs Email Server, and is believed to be clean. * * This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and * intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they * are addressed. * * If you have received this email in error please notify us at Blairs * via email at [EMAIL PROTECTED] * * Name & Registered Office: * -- * Blairs Limited * 9 Baker Street * Greenock * PA15 4TU * Company No: SC132926 * VAT No: 554698690 --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
RE: [U2] VISTA and U2 Tools
Dynamic Connect v5.1.2, wIntegrate v6.0, and UniAdmin v1.3.1 all work well with Vista Ultimate with no issued uncovered at all. --Bill -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Brenda Price Sent: Monday, March 31, 2008 8:53 AM To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: [U2] VISTA and U2 Tools We are getting new PC's soon and they will be coming with VISTA. Has anyone had any problems running U2 Tools, UniAdmin, UniObjects, etc on VISTA? Brenda L Price Senior Programmer Analyst Affiliated Acceptance Corporation Sunrise Beach, MO (800)233-8483 --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
Re: [U2] RE: UNIDATA 7.1 performance measures
As far as removing the AV altogether? One reason (in Microsoft at least), is file system filter drivers. AV applications, and many other applications, are adding these "fsfd's" into their products. Another reason, on any platform, is the intense and constant struggle & constraint for server platform resources between the number of applications Server paltofrms are running these days: - File system fragmentation. - "Un-Delete" applications. - Anti-Virus Applications. - Security applications. - Various "snap shot" technologies. - Backup products. - Replication products. Low overhead, detailed performance monitoring, 24x7x365, tells you all these things and more, not only in U2 but across the entire application server technology spectrum. Remember when application servers had scheduled downtime, for periodic platform maintenance? Disk integrity checks, defragmentation, etc? Patches and updates applied? These days, it can almost take an act of congress at some places to get a server reboot accomplished. Remember when hardware vendors ran industry standard benchmarks and characterization - simulation testing, to push Systems / Servers under "real life application" load to see how to best, code, configure & tune them? Seems like these functions have fairly much fallen by the wayside, left to the individual company/organization, due to the uniqueness & peculiaralities of "your actual mileage may vary", and explosion of technology that has occurred over the years. This is not a bad thing, necessarily, but how does a company / organization or indivdual go about such montioring, in any given environment, be it production or pre-production, without the overhead of such montioring interfereing in the performance of the platform? How does one know, in their specific environment, with their given hardware platforms, network configurations, user loads, and data set sizes, and operational business dynamics, what is "normal" performance, what is bottle-necked or throttling server platform performance, and why? It is predictable? Is it a problem that can be fixed, re-coded, adjusted, tuned, or configured better? More hardware required? What is the "cost" of running multple applications at once and where/when do they "conflict for resources"? What resources? Why? How does my Windows application server platform performance compare with a similar Linux or other Unix platform performance, "apples to apples"?? Can my current application server platform support our anticipated growth ? How much will running "month-end" impact our normal business processing cycles? It's always a lot easier when debugging any problem, tuning any application or server platform, or explaining / justifying capital expenses, (or even justifying a reboot!), to have easy to see/understand detailed graphical, factual and specific current real-time data to help point out the operational dynamics of any problem in terms everyone can see/understand, and then pro-actively monitor and verify as time moves forward, in real time, and changes are made in hopes of alleviating or resovling the problem. Have proof positive that your suggestion or changes did indeed identify and/or resolve a problem. Coming from an operational, uptime, and perfomance minded "server platforms used in business" background, I can not understand why companies/organizations/individuals would not want/need/require such data pro-actively, to continually improve, justify, and ensure that your technology infastructure is delivering all it can, 24x7x365. /ad on Performance Montoring technology exisits to allow very similar, very detailed server wide and process level montioring of numerous diverse Server application platforms; hardware, operating systems and databases/applications - in one common interface, with extremely low overhead & foot print. - multiple processors / cores - distributed applications - network configuration and throughput - storage sub-systems - Windows - Linux - AIX - Solaris One such performance monitoing application can be found at deltek.us /ad off <(PS: I tried real hard to not jump into this one, but in the end, I could not help myself - as I deal with this stuff all the time, successfully ;^)>. Regards, Scott Richardson Senior Systems Engineer / Consultant Product Support Engineer Marlborough, MA 01752 DPMonitor - http://www.deltek.us - Original Message - From: "Smith, Robert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Monday, March 31, 2008 9:45 AM Subject: RE: [U2] RE: UNIDATA 7.1 performance measures Good Morning John, Our Network Manager asked why you recommended removing the anti-virus software vs. disabling them. Could/would you please share your rationale for making that recommendation? The feedback I am getting as a result of this posting has been incredibly helpful. Rob Smith Philadelphia University -Original Message- From: [EMAIL
RE: [U2] RE: UNIDATA 7.1 performance measures
Firstly, you should NEVER run AV software on a database server. It's known for causing performance issues. By all means run a scan on the database from a remote machine via a share ... And you don't want it installed on the db server, because a lot of these things have a nasty habit of self-activating, or leaving dlls in the autoload, or whatever. AV software mucks about in the guts of the OS, and caution teaches you not to trust it ... Cheers, Wol -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Smith, Robert Sent: 31 March 2008 14:46 To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: RE: [U2] RE: UNIDATA 7.1 performance measures Good Morning John, Our Network Manager asked why you recommended removing the anti-virus software vs. disabling them. Could/would you please share your rationale for making that recommendation? The feedback I am getting as a result of this posting has been incredibly helpful. Rob Smith Philadelphia University -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Jenkins Sent: Saturday, March 29, 2008 8:29 PM To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: RE: [U2] RE: UNIDATA 7.1 performance measures Ibd start by looking for specific bottlenecks. Itbs too easy to see one of the system constraints and assume that's your bottleneck (been there). Run some mete As others have said, see a specific bottleneck first then take it from there. Some suggestions on things to look at in Windows and hardware - I'm assuming all the usual has been done inside UniData itself. __ Anti-Virus software killing you? REMOVE it first for the avoidance of doubt - then decide. Donbt just reconfigure or disable - REMOVE. Tweak afterwards - know whether itbs worth tweaking first. Paging (yes/no/how much)? Disk performance *read *write *wait I/O Are you using RAID? Should be 0+1, try and avoid RAID 5 Use hardware RAID not software Turn off read-ahead, optimise for random, not sequential Steps vary for different SANS (Hitachi / Veritas / Shark etc). If using an external SAN: * has the memory battery failed? (turns off write caching - a killer) Put paging space on a separate disk, and UniData TMP also. * Do you have remote mirroring on the SAM turned on (requiring remote commit on writes can be a killer). _ If 3Gb is does turn out to be an issue consider Unix, much better memory management. Linux on your x86 platform seems the logical move (same hardware). You also get better CPU resource usage on Unix then Windows. Memory could be a bottleneck for you, but Ibd be surprised. The usual memory related issues I see on Windows (or Unix come to that) are due to file import/export programs READING and WRITING truly enormous text files from the O/S file structures. READSEQ and WRITESEQ are the cure there/ Regards JayJay From: Smith, Robert Sent: Thursday, March 27, 2008 11:37 AM To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: UNIDATA 7.1 performance measures Good Morning, We are a UNIDATA shop and presently we are struggling with identifying the best way to increase the performance level of our environment. We presently are running UD on a Windows Enterprise server (SP2) with 16gig of ram and 8 - 3gig processors. We have read through some MS Knowledge Base articles that suggest a possible performance increase if we use the /PAE and /3GB boot.ini switches. We were wondering whether anyone has deployed these settings before and if there were any problems that resulted...with either the OS or database. Does anyone have any suggestions regarding ways to increase UD performance levels in a Win2k3 environment? Thanks in advance, Rob Smith Philadelphia University --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
RE: [U2] RE: UNIDATA 7.1 performance measures
Depending on your virus product, it could be creating a constraint on the IO subsystem - perhaps even a single threaded one (again, depending on your virus product - some are better than others) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Smith, Robert Sent: Monday, March 31, 2008 9:46 AM To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: RE: [U2] RE: UNIDATA 7.1 performance measures Good Morning John, Our Network Manager asked why you recommended removing the anti-virus software vs. disabling them. Could/would you please share your rationale for making that recommendation? The feedback I am getting as a result of this posting has been incredibly helpful. Rob Smith Philadelphia University -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Jenkins Sent: Saturday, March 29, 2008 8:29 PM To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: RE: [U2] RE: UNIDATA 7.1 performance measures Ibd start by looking for specific bottlenecks. Itbs too easy to see one of the system constraints and assume that's your bottleneck (been there). Run some mete As others have said, see a specific bottleneck first then take it from there. Some suggestions on things to look at in Windows and hardware - I'm assuming all the usual has been done inside UniData itself. __ Anti-Virus software killing you? REMOVE it first for the avoidance of doubt - then decide. Donbt just reconfigure or disable - REMOVE. Tweak afterwards - know whether itbs worth tweaking first. Paging (yes/no/how much)? Disk performance *read *write *wait I/O Are you using RAID? Should be 0+1, try and avoid RAID 5 Use hardware RAID not software Turn off read-ahead, optimise for random, not sequential Steps vary for different SANS (Hitachi / Veritas / Shark etc). If using an external SAN: * has the memory battery failed? (turns off write caching - a killer) Put paging space on a separate disk, and UniData TMP also. * Do you have remote mirroring on the SAM turned on (requiring remote commit on writes can be a killer). _ If 3Gb is does turn out to be an issue consider Unix, much better memory management. Linux on your x86 platform seems the logical move (same hardware). You also get better CPU resource usage on Unix then Windows. Memory could be a bottleneck for you, but Ibd be surprised. The usual memory related issues I see on Windows (or Unix come to that) are due to file import/export programs READING and WRITING truly enormous text files from the O/S file structures. READSEQ and WRITESEQ are the cure there/ Regards JayJay From: Smith, Robert Sent: Thursday, March 27, 2008 11:37 AM To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: UNIDATA 7.1 performance measures Good Morning, We are a UNIDATA shop and presently we are struggling with identifying the best way to increase the performance level of our environment. We presently are running UD on a Windows Enterprise server (SP2) with 16gig of ram and 8 - 3gig processors. We have read through some MS Knowledge Base articles that suggest a possible performance increase if we use the /PAE and /3GB boot.ini switches. We were wondering whether anyone has deployed these settings before and if there were any problems that resulted...with either the OS or database. Does anyone have any suggestions regarding ways to increase UD performance levels in a Win2k3 environment? Thanks in advance, Rob Smith Philadelphia University --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
RE: [U2] RE: UNIDATA 7.1 performance measures
Good Morning John, Our Network Manager asked why you recommended removing the anti-virus software vs. disabling them. Could/would you please share your rationale for making that recommendation? The feedback I am getting as a result of this posting has been incredibly helpful. Rob Smith Philadelphia University -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Jenkins Sent: Saturday, March 29, 2008 8:29 PM To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: RE: [U2] RE: UNIDATA 7.1 performance measures Ibd start by looking for specific bottlenecks. Itbs too easy to see one of the system constraints and assume that's your bottleneck (been there). Run some mete As others have said, see a specific bottleneck first then take it from there. Some suggestions on things to look at in Windows and hardware - I'm assuming all the usual has been done inside UniData itself. __ Anti-Virus software killing you? REMOVE it first for the avoidance of doubt - then decide. Donbt just reconfigure or disable - REMOVE. Tweak afterwards - know whether itbs worth tweaking first. Paging (yes/no/how much)? Disk performance *read *write *wait I/O Are you using RAID? Should be 0+1, try and avoid RAID 5 Use hardware RAID not software Turn off read-ahead, optimise for random, not sequential Steps vary for different SANS (Hitachi / Veritas / Shark etc). If using an external SAN: * has the memory battery failed? (turns off write caching - a killer) Put paging space on a separate disk, and UniData TMP also. * Do you have remote mirroring on the SAM turned on (requiring remote commit on writes can be a killer). _ If 3Gb is does turn out to be an issue consider Unix, much better memory management. Linux on your x86 platform seems the logical move (same hardware). You also get better CPU resource usage on Unix then Windows. Memory could be a bottleneck for you, but Ibd be surprised. The usual memory related issues I see on Windows (or Unix come to that) are due to file import/export programs READING and WRITING truly enormous text files from the O/S file structures. READSEQ and WRITESEQ are the cure there/ Regards JayJay From: Smith, Robert Sent: Thursday, March 27, 2008 11:37 AM To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: UNIDATA 7.1 performance measures Good Morning, We are a UNIDATA shop and presently we are struggling with identifying the best way to increase the performance level of our environment. We presently are running UD on a Windows Enterprise server (SP2) with 16gig of ram and 8 - 3gig processors. We have read through some MS Knowledge Base articles that suggest a possible performance increase if we use the /PAE and /3GB boot.ini switches. We were wondering whether anyone has deployed these settings before and if there were any problems that resulted...with either the OS or database. Does anyone have any suggestions regarding ways to increase UD performance levels in a Win2k3 environment? Thanks in advance, Rob Smith Philadelphia University --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
[U2] VISTA and U2 Tools
We are getting new PC's soon and they will be coming with VISTA. Has anyone had any problems running U2 Tools, UniAdmin, UniObjects, etc on VISTA? Brenda L Price Senior Programmer Analyst Affiliated Acceptance Corporation Sunrise Beach, MO (800)233-8483 --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
