Re: [U2] Deep and long indentations vs multiple exit points - AD NAUSEUM

2007-12-03 Thread Ray Wurlod
Since AD takes the accusative case, it's AD NAUSEAM

(I don't really want to argue JMP instructions, which is all there is once you 
get to the compiled code.)
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/


Re: [U2] Deep and long indentations vs multiple exit points - AD NAUSEUM

2007-12-03 Thread MAJ Programming
Couple of thoughts.
1. Yes, the 'style' debates tend to be self-serving.
2. I do end up with either feeling good about my techniques or finding out
another good technique.
3. By expressing my preferred techniques, others may may experience #2
above.

By keeping an open mind, each of us knows how these techniques, both new to
us and our own favorites, can weave into our own environments.

Many participants seem to manage large shops with 100's of users so every
cycle counts. But I'm sure others manage 10-20 users shops. Some have
4GL-style systems with implied rules and requirements. Others may have
home-grown systems from the Jurrasic Pick era.

Without comparisons, we all function in a vacuum.

My 1 cent
Mark Johnson
- Original Message -
From: "Clifton Oliver" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: 
Sent: Sunday, December 02, 2007 10:55 PM
Subject: Re: [U2] Deep and long indentations vs multiple exit points - AD
NAUSEUM


> Perhaps you might want to expand your search criteria to include "the
> last ten years" and examine the use of Guard Clauses.
>
> Does anyone else on the list find these discussions of "style," "good
> practice," etc. to be both out-of-date and an exercise in wasted
> bandwidth (not to mention having too much time on one's hands)?
>
> People being what they are, these discussions always boil down to,
> "I'm going to do it my way because I'm right and you are wrong."
>
> Wouldn't the time be best spent retesting that A/R modification you
> plan to push to Production tomorrow night?
>
>
> --
>
> Regards,
>
> Clif
>
> On Dec 2, 2007, at 5:12 PM, Boydell, Stuart wrote:
>
> > I'm in complete agreement with the "one way in/out" (OWI-OWO )
> > rule. Out
> > of interest, I have searched the net and of the many articles I found
> > which cited OWI-OWO, all cited it in the scope of being good
> > practice. I
> > found one which cites "one way in, multiple|many ways out" with a
> > scathing comment.
> ---
> u2-users mailing list
> u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
> To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/


Re: [U2] Deep and long indentations vs multiple exit points - AD NAUSEUM

2007-12-02 Thread Clifton Oliver
Perhaps you might want to expand your search criteria to include "the  
last ten years" and examine the use of Guard Clauses.


Does anyone else on the list find these discussions of "style," "good  
practice," etc. to be both out-of-date and an exercise in wasted  
bandwidth (not to mention having too much time on one's hands)?


People being what they are, these discussions always boil down to,  
"I'm going to do it my way because I'm right and you are wrong."


Wouldn't the time be best spent retesting that A/R modification you  
plan to push to Production tomorrow night?



--

Regards,

Clif

On Dec 2, 2007, at 5:12 PM, Boydell, Stuart wrote:

I'm in complete agreement with the "one way in/out" (OWI-OWO )  
rule. Out

of interest, I have searched the net and of the many articles I found
which cited OWI-OWO, all cited it in the scope of being good  
practice. I

found one which cites "one way in, multiple|many ways out" with a
scathing comment.

---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/