Re: [U2] REMOVE() was Is This Worth Rewriting
You can use more than 1 REMOVE in a loop, you know? On 02/03/2011 22:35, Steve Romanow wrote: I tried to drink the KoolAid and use REMOVE on some projects, but found a show stopper on UDT6.1. I cannot remember the specifics. Oh, I remember, In cases where you are addressing aligned mv's with your loop variable it was not saving you that much because you still need extract the other vars. Does that make sense? If you have 4 aligned mv's. You only gain on the 1st, but still have 3 extracts per iteration. It was cleaner just to keep the FOR loop. One more reason I am pushing to do my business logic in python where I have a whole lot more options in data structures. ___ U2-Users mailing list U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users ___ U2-Users mailing list U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
Re: [U2] REMOVE() was Is This Worth Rewriting
I had not considered that. TY for the tip! On 3/3/11, Mecki Foerthmann mec...@gmx.net wrote: You can use more than 1 REMOVE in a loop, you know? On 02/03/2011 22:35, Steve Romanow wrote: I tried to drink the KoolAid and use REMOVE on some projects, but found a show stopper on UDT6.1. I cannot remember the specifics. Oh, I remember, In cases where you are addressing aligned mv's with your loop variable it was not saving you that much because you still need extract the other vars. Does that make sense? If you have 4 aligned mv's. You only gain on the 1st, but still have 3 extracts per iteration. It was cleaner just to keep the FOR loop. One more reason I am pushing to do my business logic in python where I have a whole lot more options in data structures. ___ U2-Users mailing list U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users ___ U2-Users mailing list U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users -- Sent from my mobile device ___ U2-Users mailing list U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
Re: [U2] REMOVE() was Is This Worth Rewriting
I tried to drink the KoolAid and use REMOVE on some projects, but found a show stopper on UDT6.1. I cannot remember the specifics. Oh, I remember, In cases where you are addressing aligned mv's with your loop variable it was not saving you that much because you still need extract the other vars. Does that make sense? If you have 4 aligned mv's. You only gain on the 1st, but still have 3 extracts per iteration. It was cleaner just to keep the FOR loop. One more reason I am pushing to do my business logic in python where I have a whole lot more options in data structures. ___ U2-Users mailing list U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
Re: [U2] REMOVE() was Is This Worth Rewriting
Yes. Your aligned multivalues are also referred to as dependent-controlling sets. You have one attribute controlling the placements of the values for the others. Nasty buggers, always bite. You have to grab them right behind the ears. -Original Message- From: Steve Romanow slestak...@gmail.com To: U2 Users List u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Sent: Wed, Mar 2, 2011 2:35 pm Subject: Re: [U2] REMOVE() was Is This Worth Rewriting I tried to drink the KoolAid and use REMOVE on some projects, but found a show stopper on UDT6.1. I cannot remember the specifics. Oh, I remember, In cases where you are addressing aligned mv's with your loop variable it was not saving you that much because you still need extract the other vars. Does that make sense? If you have 4 aligned mv's. You only gain on the 1st, but still have 3 extracts per iteration. It was cleaner just to keep the FOR loop. One more reason I am pushing to do my business logic in python where I have a whole lot more options in data structures. ___ U2-Users mailing list U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users ___ U2-Users mailing list U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
