Re[2]: [U2] Intercall - ic_opensession

[jbutera]

> yes, we have been using that for years in universe.  My question was
> more about the Unidata extension and what it brings?

Sorry - I haven't ued the other alternative, so I can't comment on the
difference.

Jeff Butera, Ph.D.
Administrative Systems
Hampshire College
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
413-559-5556

"...our behavior matters more than the beliefs that we profess."
Elizabeth Deutsch Earle
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/

Re[2]: [U2] Intercall - ic_opensession

[David Tod Sigafoos]

jbutera,

yes, we have been using that for years in universe.  My question was
more about the Unidata extension and what it brings?

thanks

Tuesday, August 2, 2005, 11:30:26 AM, you wrote:

>> The intercall definition ic_opensession is defined for opening a
>> session for a connection to U2 .. there is also a ic_unidata_session
>> and a ic_universe_session.
>>
>> The only difference I can see between the 3 is that ic_unidata_session
>> has a 7th parameter 'Unidata_Server'.  Otherwise they all appear to
>> work the same.
>>
>> As we are moving a process from Universe to Unidata i wanted to check
>> that I am not missing anything *important*.  The process appears to
>> work correctly but ..

jhe> I've been using this on Unidata for 3+ years without a hitch:

jhe> session_id=ic_opensession(server,username,password,account,&code,NULL);




-- 
DSig `
David Tod Sigafoos  ( O O )
 ___oOOo__( )__oOOo___

"Our greatest duty in this life is to help others. And please, if you can't 
help them, could you at least not hurt them?" - H.H. the Dalai Lama
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/