RE: The lists are closing
Is it just me that thinks a yahoo group would be good.. or am I missing something, it seems to provide what everyone is asking for ? doesn't it? Kevin King moderates the sbsolutions group.. see his comments below... While Yahoo groups hasn't been the best or most consistent host in the world, there is no plan at the time to move our sbsolutions folks over to u2ug. Not to be a stick in the mud, but things are working really well over there and there's no compelling reason to move at this point in time. Besides, the moderation is simple, every user can elect either a web or email experience, and it's just easy. And the ads haven't gotten too heinous (yet). --Kevin [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.PrecisOnline.com -Original Message- From: Anthony Youngman To: U2 Users Discussion List Sent: 30/03/04 05:19 Subject: RE: The lists are closing What do we do? It looks like the answer may well be "wait and your prayers will be answered" :-) -- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
RE: U2UG Contract
sbsolutions & rbsolutions are on yahoo groups.. http://groups.yahoo.com/group/sbsolutions you can select individual emails, digests or no email, and read on the website.. maybe a u2solutions? -Original Message- From: Raymond de Bourbon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 29 March 2004 13:20 To: 'U2 Users Discussion List' Subject: RE: U2UG Contract Yeah I agree, forums are a pain - A new mailing list would be my prefered choice.. If I had the bandwidth I would set it up.. Raymond de Bourbon -- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
RE: SBClient on Windows XP
Hi,
Yeah.. I am currently just re-coding it in .NET.. so I can send and example
next week when its done and usefully commented ;-)
I actually have to insert values in the whole of the file, as for example..
attribute 1 has the hostname(ip) in it... etc..
So what I did was, by working out which settings were stored where, I chang
the things which are relevant to our use of the sbc file..
If anyone else wants a copy of the code, email me off list, with subject
"SBC builder" and I will send it out off list next week.
Cheers
Andy
-Original Message-
From: Jason Theis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 06 February 2004 16:12
To: 'U2 Users Discussion List'
Subject: RE: SBClient on Windows XP
Andy,
Can you give us more details? Does this mean you are only parsing the
script part at line 100 leaving the other defaulted items as they are? Can
you send us an example?
Thanks,
JT
-Original Message-
From: Lee, Andy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 06, 2004 2:17 AM
To: 'U2 Users Discussion List'
Subject: RE: SBClient on Windows XP
We have had this...
Quite a lot of problems on win2k.. where scripts would 'break' and hang at
certain prompts.. or like yours, not actually start properly.
We have made the scripts more stable by creating them programmatically, as
the sbc file is quite easy to parse, its char(254), char(253) and char(252)
seperated.. and the script section is from attribute 100..
Since doing this, we haven't had any problems, but it has only been a couple
of months, I don't trust SBC scripting just yet.. it is a whacky beast!
Andy
-Original Message-
From: Jason Theis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 05 February 2004 14:40
To: 'U2 Users Discussion List'
Subject: RE: SBClient on Windows XP
Speaking of SBClient. Has anyone seen issues launching an SBClient document
session using the below code snipet?
Set oSBClientConn = CreateObject("SBClient.SBClient.1")
status = oSBClientConn.StartServer(SBClientSession, strParams, 1,
gstrSessionHandle)
Note: Variables SBClientSession, strParams contain appropriate values to
initiate the SB+ connection. gstrSessionHandle is used for reference to
session.
We are experiencing script lockups on about 50% of our XP installations and
about 15% of our Windows 2000 sessions. By script lockup I mean - upon the
call to the proper SBClient.sbc (document) session the script will attempt
to start but nothing will happen. The only way I can take care of this
issue is to go to help, troubleshooting, reset port.
Any ideas would help.
JT
--
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
--
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
--
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
RE: SBClient on Windows XP
We have had this...
Quite a lot of problems on win2k.. where scripts would 'break' and hang at
certain prompts.. or like yours, not actually start properly.
We have made the scripts more stable by creating them programmatically, as
the sbc file is quite easy to parse, its char(254), char(253) and char(252)
seperated.. and the script section is from attribute 100..
Since doing this, we haven't had any problems, but it has only been a couple
of months, I don't trust SBC scripting just yet.. it is a whacky beast!
Andy
-Original Message-
From: Jason Theis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 05 February 2004 14:40
To: 'U2 Users Discussion List'
Subject: RE: SBClient on Windows XP
Speaking of SBClient. Has anyone seen issues launching an SBClient document
session using the below code snipet?
Set oSBClientConn = CreateObject("SBClient.SBClient.1")
status = oSBClientConn.StartServer(SBClientSession, strParams, 1,
gstrSessionHandle)
Note: Variables SBClientSession, strParams contain appropriate values to
initiate the SB+ connection. gstrSessionHandle is used for reference to
session.
We are experiencing script lockups on about 50% of our XP installations and
about 15% of our Windows 2000 sessions. By script lockup I mean - upon the
call to the proper SBClient.sbc (document) session the script will attempt
to start but nothing will happen. The only way I can take care of this
issue is to go to help, troubleshooting, reset port.
Any ideas would help.
JT
--
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
RE: SBClient on Windows XP
Title: RE: SBClient on Windows XP Mike, I think SBClient 5.2.4 is the earliest version supported for XP We found the 4. releases to be very cpu hungry.. but from about 5.0.5 they got better. We use 5.2.3 & 5.2.4 with no cpu issues. Cheers Andy -Original Message- From: Mike Farrant To: U2 Users Discussion List Sent: 05/02/04 07:06 Subject: SBClient on Windows XP Can someone help? To access our main application which is written mainly in SB+ (text based only - no GUI) we use SBClient. Since the advent of 32 Bit Operating systems (some time ago now) we have seen an extremely disproportionate amount of CPU resource being taken up by SBClient even just by typing a single key. Is this a setup issue (O/S or application), a 'fixed in the next release' issue or a 'find another emulator' issue??? I am currently running SBClient 4.5.3 (Build 84) on Windows XP Pro O/S (but the problem seems to be the same on all 32bit Platforms). Thanks in advance anyone who can help. Mike -- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
