Re: Input weirdo...
Here's another solution: LOOP INPUT VAR,-1 IF VAR THEN INPUT TOUCH,1 IF TOUCH = 'X' THEN EXIT END REPEAT - Original Message - From: Mark Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: U2 Users Discussion List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 28, 2004 10:41 PM Subject: Re: Input weirdo... I have a new client that i've yet to be able to break key with over the modem. So if I'm running a program (readnext etc) but i want to break, I include this INCLUDE. IF SYSTEM(14) # 0 THEN INPUT A IF A=Q THEN CLEARSELECT (sic) ; STOP IF A=D THEN DEBUG END SYSTEM(14) is the length of the typeahead buffer. D3 for sure and possibly UV/UD. The CLEARSELECT is UV/UD specific. My 1 cent. - Original Message - From: Dennis Bartlett [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: 'U2 Users Discussion List' [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 28, 2004 10:54 AM Subject: Input weirdo... We have a program looping through all data files searching for something - sometimes it gets to a file containing several million records and we'd like to be able to tell it to skip that file and continue with the next file. We've tried the following approaches with said results: (1) OPT.OUT = KEYIN() ; if OPT.OUT = 1 then EXIT OPT.OUT = 0 the program sits waiting for input in every iteration, ie every record (2) INPUT OPT.OUT,-1 ; if OPT.OUT = 'S' then EXIT OPT.OUT = 0 CLEARDATA CLEARINPUT the program works perfectly until an 'S' is entered then skips every file after that... HOWEVER, if I press Ctrl-Break, enter DEBUG, enter C(ontinue), the program continues as normal until another 'S' is entered.. Obviously the machine still has something in the input buffer, despite the CLEARDATA, something that gets whacked when debug hits the scene... Any ideas? -- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users -- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users -- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
Re: Modulo Separation
Have you considered dynamic files? Stu Glancy Asset Management Outsourcing, Inc. Senior Analyst/DBA 770-792-3907 Hi all! We have HP unix: 1) HP-UX l1000 B.11.00 U 9000/800 534706547 unlimited-user license 2) UniVerse: RELLEVEL 001 X 002 9.5.2.6 003 INFORMATION 004 INFORMATION.FORMAT 005 9.5.2.6.r8 3) GLOBUS banking system G12.2.06 - There are some files which are greater 300 Mb and which are still growing... We use separation = 8 (the best separation for HP-UX) or = 16 if records are greater than 4000 bytes. If records are less than 4000 it's no problem to use RESIZE operator but in the case they are greater than 4000 RESIZE takes more than 3 hours. How to make RESIZE work faster? - Which is the best way to count modulo separation? Thanks in advance. Dmitry Zhirov INTERPROMBANK Moscow òâä -- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users -- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
Re: VOC prompt issue?
I put all imputs like * . . . suggestion at the beginning of the PA.
It organizes all it for me.
Stu Glancy
Asset Management Outsourcing, Inc.
Senior Analyst/DBA
770-792-3907
I put CLEARPROMPTS AND A, and it's working as expected now. I suspect
either of them would have worked, but both is nice, too...
Thanks to the winners, Glenn, Wyatt, Marlene (and any others who knew
but are patient enough to wait to see who else responds).
I didn't try the * . . . suggestion. I don't understand that one but
have seen the others ('A waist is a terrible thing to mind' or something
like that) but couldn't get them out of the gray matter.
Karl
On Tue, 2004-04-06 at 10:47, Karl L Pearson wrote:
I have this VOC item we run:
ED VOC BIN.LOC
7 lines long.
: P
0001: PA
0002: CLEARDATA
0003: CLEARSELECT
0004: SELECT INVMST WITH F12 = ENTER BIN LOCATION TO LIST ITEMS FOR:
0005: SELECT INVMST WITH WAREHOUSE = 1 REQUIRE.SELECT
0006: SELECT INVMST WITH F12 # '' REQUIRE.SELECT
0007: LIST INVMST BY F04 BY ITEM F04 F12 ITEM F13 F14 F28 T48 DOLR DOLS
ID.SUP LPTR DBL-SPC HEADING SPECIAL FOR CHRISTINE...ALL ITEMS IN A
SPECIFIC BIN LOCATION 'T' PAGE 'P' REQUIRE.SELECT
Bottom at line 7.
When it's run multiple times, the second time re-prints the first run
without prompting for a new bin location. Logging off, which I suspect
clears something or other, allows the person to run it on a second
item.
Any thoughts?
--
Karl L. Pearson
Director of IT,
ATS Industrial Supply
Direct: 801-978-4429
Toll-free: 888-972-3182 x29
Fax: 801-972-3888
http://www.atsindustrial.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Karl L. Pearson
Director of IT,
ATS Industrial Supply
Direct: 801-978-4429
Toll-free: 888-972-3182 x29
Fax: 801-972-3888
http://www.atsindustrial.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
--
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
RE: Linux kernel params
Do you have a source for pg. Our admin guy couldn't find one. Stu Glancy Asset Management Outsourcing, Inc. Senior Analyst/DBA 770-792-3907 I think on linux they're different programs, and pg may not be installed (but it can be installed) [EMAIL PROTECTED] john]$ ls -shil `which more less` 2015305 28K -rwxr-xr-x1 root root 26K Feb 24 2003 /bin/more 344104 136K -rwxr-xr-x1 root root 130K Feb 4 2003 /usr/bin/less On Fri, 12 Mar 2004, Anthony Youngman wrote: Minor nitpick ... In linux, I think you'll find more is a link to less. Either that, or you'll find the behaviour of the program changes depending which name it is called by, and less has the better set of options :-) Cheers, Wol -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Stu Glancy Sent: 11 March 2004 21:11 To: U2 Users Discussion List Subject: Re: Linux kernel params We are doing similar from HP-UX to Linux 9 (kernel 2.4.20-28.9bigmem) and UV 10.0.O to UV 10.1 and found that APP.PROGS LIST.SP.CONF uses unix command pg which does not exist in linux Red Hat. We did a work around by creating a link from pg to more. This has been reported to IBM and is in engineering as ECase 6621. Stu Glancy Asset Management Outsourcing, Inc. Senior Analyst/DBA 770-792-3907 We are in the process of migrating our Universe app from an HP-UX system to a RedHat Linux (8.0) system. There did not appear to be any recommended o/s changes in the docs (although I did change the max number of open files). Does anyone have any suggested changes? Thanks, Drew -- -- Drew Henderson There are two types of people - Dir. for Computer Center Operations those who do the work and those [EMAIL PROTECTED] who take the credit. Try to be in the first group, there is 110 Ginger Hall less competition. Morehead State University Indira Ghandi Morehead, KY 40351 Phone: 606/783-2445 Fax: 606/783-5078 -- -- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users -- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users -- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
RE: EVAL
Then try this idea: EVAL FMT(LEN(NAME),R#4) AS SORTORD BY.DSND SORTORD Stu Glancy Asset Management Outsourcing, Inc. Senior Analyst/DBA 770-792-3907 Tried that before and it still sorted left (on UniData). That's why I asked. From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Randy Gill Sent: Thu 3/11/2004 3:27 PM To: U2 Users Discussion List Subject: RE: EVAL Yes, I use this feature often in UniVerse (running in PI/OPEN flavor). Suppose I wanted to list the customers with the longest names, I would use: LIST CUSTOMER NAME BY.DSND EVAL LEN(NAME) FMT 2R Since the default is left justification, if I omitted the 'FMT 2R', all the customers with 9-character names would be sorted before those with 10+ character names! The FMT clause causes it to sort as one would expect. Hope this helps. Randy -Original Message- From: Dave Davis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, March 11, 2004 9:23 AM To: U2 Users Discussion List Subject: RE: EVAL On the use of FMT to affect the justification of an EVAL field, can this be used to affect a sort by an EVAL field? It doesn't seem to affect it when I do it in unidata. Our company accepts no liability for the content of this email, or for the consequences of any actions taken on the basis of the information provided, unless that information is subsequently confirmed in writing. Any views or opinions presented in this email are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of the company. WARNING: Computer viruses can be transmitted via email. The recipient should check this email and any attachments for the presence of viruses. The company accepts no liability for any damage caused by any virus transmitted by this email. 11/29/2003 ACE Software, LLC -- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users -- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users -- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
Re: Linux kernel params
We are doing similar from HP-UX to Linux 9 (kernel 2.4.20-28.9bigmem) and UV 10.0.O to UV 10.1 and found that APP.PROGS LIST.SP.CONF uses unix command pg which does not exist in linux Red Hat. We did a work around by creating a link from pg to more. This has been reported to IBM and is in engineering as ECase 6621. Stu Glancy Asset Management Outsourcing, Inc. Senior Analyst/DBA 770-792-3907 We are in the process of migrating our Universe app from an HP-UX system to a RedHat Linux (8.0) system. There did not appear to be any recommended o/s changes in the docs (although I did change the max number of open files). Does anyone have any suggested changes? Thanks, Drew -- -- Drew Henderson There are two types of people - Dir. for Computer Center Operations those who do the work and those [EMAIL PROTECTED] who take the credit. Try to be in the first group, there is 110 Ginger Hall less competition. Morehead State University Indira Ghandi Morehead, KY 40351 Phone: 606/783-2445 Fax: 606/783-5078 -- -- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users -- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
RE: Universe/Redhat GCI
Perhaps Universe 9.6.1.14 is not certified to run on RH 9. Its not in the product matrix. -Original Message-From: David Ward [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Monday, February 02, 2004 12:19 PMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Universe/Redhat GCI Hello, We loaded version 9.6.1.14 of Universe on Redhat release 9. Everything seems to run fine, but we are unable to complie GCI programs into the shell. We removed all of the items in GCI and attempted a rebuild and this fails as well. Has anyone successfully compiled GCI under this configuration? If so, could you provide some pointers? Thanks, -dew ___ u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
