Re: UniVerse vs Progress Performance
Sounds like something is not tuned properly somewhere. Another Onion that needs a damn good peeling! Download the DPMonitor on both of these puppies, and then you can realistically compare volumes of I/O, volumes of CPU, volumes of memory, etc... in an apples to apples sort of comparison of sorts. Once you have it peeled and profiled, you will then have the technology required to put it all back together properly, so that it will scream like a raped-ape as they say. Not only that - you can monitor what ever changes you make along the way and clearly see if they help, or hurt your cause, and why. See my other reply to the Performance Degraded... thread. When you peel all the layers off these tight, nasty onions, and understand what's going on at all the different levels - it make it easy to identify, address resolve these problems - and monitor them proactively going forward as changes occur, growth/shrinkage happens, or additional processes / users come into the mix. UV applications, properly tuned and configured on their platform, should run extremely well, price/performance-wise. Been there, done that. Many times over. Sincere Regards, Scott Richardson Senior Systems Engineer / Consultant Marlborough, MA 01752 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Web: http://home.comcast.net/~CheetahFTL/CC/CheetahFTL_1.htm eFax: 208-445-1259 - Original Message - From: Ross Ferris [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: U2 Users Discussion List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, April 16, 2004 12:48 AM Subject: RE: UniVerse vs Progress Performance Probably need to see Progress running on the IBM under AIX - or UV on Intel chip with same OS to make significant comparison; even neglecting just WHAT is going on under the hood could have been 400+ users doing 'nothing' Ross Ferris Stamina Software Visage - an Evolution in Software Development -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dawn M. Wolthuis Sent: Friday, 16 April 2004 1:36 PM To: 'U2 Users Discussion List' Subject: RE: UniVerse vs Progress Performance I'm curious if there is a follow up on this? Is it a database tuning issue? Indexing? Memory? ... Thanks. --dawn Dawn M. Wolthuis Tincat Group, Inc. www.tincat-group.com Take and give some delight today. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of André Nel Sent: Tuesday, March 23, 2004 3:07 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: FW: UniVerse vs Progress Performance Hi All Visited a neighbouring company (same line of business as ours) running 430 users on a Compaq Proliant box with SCO Openserver 5 and Progress version 9.1c as database. Application is in-house. At the time of my visit the CPU usage was constantly running at 80%. No problems being experienced with users complaining the system is slow etc. The server spec is as follows: 2x intel pentium III xeon 500Mhz processors 1.8GB RAM Smart Array 3200 controller Compaq Fast SCSI-2 controller 10x 18.2 GB Ultra SCSI-2 drives (8 drives are RAID 1, other 2 RAID 0) and 5 drives on Ultra 2 controller and 5 drives on Ultra 3 Controller 2x 10/100 Tx Ethernet controllers We are running AIX v5.1 with Maintainance Level 3 and UniVerse 10.0.7 (190 users) on a p620 box with the following specs: System Model: IBM,7025-6F1 Machine Serial Number: 6577ABA Processor Type: PowerPC_RS64-III Number Of Processors: 2 Processor Clock Speed: 602 MHz CPU Type: 64-bit Kernel Type: 32-bit LPAR Info: -1 NULL Memory Size: 4096 MB Good Memory Size: 4096 MB Paging 3072MB Firmware Version: IBM,M2P01208 Our box is struggling with the 190 users. File types are T30. All our lines are minimum 64K diginet. Comparing the 2 boxes, the amount of users on each box, any reason why we are struggling with the 190 users? The transaction volumes of the company running 430 users are considerably higher than ours? Any comments please Thanks André -- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users -- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users --- Incoming mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.658 / Virus Database: 421 - Release Date: 9/04/2004 --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.658 / Virus Database: 421 - Release Date: 9/04/2004 -- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users -- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
RE: UniVerse vs Progress Performance
I thought that Progress lives as more-or-less a traditional SQL database. Please clarify...What is special about Progress ? --Bill -- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
RE: UniVerse vs Progress Performance
I'm curious if there is a follow up on this? Is it a database tuning issue? Indexing? Memory? ... Thanks. --dawn Dawn M. Wolthuis Tincat Group, Inc. www.tincat-group.com Take and give some delight today. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of André Nel Sent: Tuesday, March 23, 2004 3:07 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: FW: UniVerse vs Progress Performance Hi All Visited a neighbouring company (same line of business as ours) running 430 users on a Compaq Proliant box with SCO Openserver 5 and Progress version 9.1c as database. Application is in-house. At the time of my visit the CPU usage was constantly running at 80%. No problems being experienced with users complaining the system is slow etc. The server spec is as follows: 2x intel pentium III xeon 500Mhz processors 1.8GB RAM Smart Array 3200 controller Compaq Fast SCSI-2 controller 10x 18.2 GB Ultra SCSI-2 drives (8 drives are RAID 1, other 2 RAID 0) and 5 drives on Ultra 2 controller and 5 drives on Ultra 3 Controller 2x 10/100 Tx Ethernet controllers We are running AIX v5.1 with Maintainance Level 3 and UniVerse 10.0.7 (190 users) on a p620 box with the following specs: System Model: IBM,7025-6F1 Machine Serial Number: 6577ABA Processor Type: PowerPC_RS64-III Number Of Processors: 2 Processor Clock Speed: 602 MHz CPU Type: 64-bit Kernel Type: 32-bit LPAR Info: -1 NULL Memory Size: 4096 MB Good Memory Size: 4096 MB Paging 3072MB Firmware Version: IBM,M2P01208 Our box is struggling with the 190 users. File types are T30. All our lines are minimum 64K diginet. Comparing the 2 boxes, the amount of users on each box, any reason why we are struggling with the 190 users? The transaction volumes of the company running 430 users are considerably higher than ours? Any comments please Thanks André -- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users -- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
RE: UniVerse vs Progress Performance
Probably need to see Progress running on the IBM under AIX - or UV on Intel chip with same OS to make significant comparison; even neglecting just WHAT is going on under the hood could have been 400+ users doing 'nothing' Ross Ferris Stamina Software Visage - an Evolution in Software Development -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dawn M. Wolthuis Sent: Friday, 16 April 2004 1:36 PM To: 'U2 Users Discussion List' Subject: RE: UniVerse vs Progress Performance I'm curious if there is a follow up on this? Is it a database tuning issue? Indexing? Memory? ... Thanks. --dawn Dawn M. Wolthuis Tincat Group, Inc. www.tincat-group.com Take and give some delight today. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of André Nel Sent: Tuesday, March 23, 2004 3:07 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: FW: UniVerse vs Progress Performance Hi All Visited a neighbouring company (same line of business as ours) running 430 users on a Compaq Proliant box with SCO Openserver 5 and Progress version 9.1c as database. Application is in-house. At the time of my visit the CPU usage was constantly running at 80%. No problems being experienced with users complaining the system is slow etc. The server spec is as follows: 2x intel pentium III xeon 500Mhz processors 1.8GB RAM Smart Array 3200 controller Compaq Fast SCSI-2 controller 10x 18.2 GB Ultra SCSI-2 drives (8 drives are RAID 1, other 2 RAID 0) and 5 drives on Ultra 2 controller and 5 drives on Ultra 3 Controller 2x 10/100 Tx Ethernet controllers We are running AIX v5.1 with Maintainance Level 3 and UniVerse 10.0.7 (190 users) on a p620 box with the following specs: System Model: IBM,7025-6F1 Machine Serial Number: 6577ABA Processor Type: PowerPC_RS64-III Number Of Processors: 2 Processor Clock Speed: 602 MHz CPU Type: 64-bit Kernel Type: 32-bit LPAR Info: -1 NULL Memory Size: 4096 MB Good Memory Size: 4096 MB Paging 3072MB Firmware Version: IBM,M2P01208 Our box is struggling with the 190 users. File types are T30. All our lines are minimum 64K diginet. Comparing the 2 boxes, the amount of users on each box, any reason why we are struggling with the 190 users? The transaction volumes of the company running 430 users are considerably higher than ours? Any comments please Thanks André -- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users -- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users --- Incoming mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.658 / Virus Database: 421 - Release Date: 9/04/2004 --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.658 / Virus Database: 421 - Release Date: 9/04/2004 -- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
