[Bug 1032923] [NEW] package libldap-2.4-2 2.4.28-1.1ubuntu4 [modified: usr/share/doc/libldap-2.4-2/changelog.Debian.gz] failed to install/upgrade: libldap-2.4-2:amd64 2.4.28-1.1ubuntu4 cannot be confi

2012-08-04 Thread Олег
Public bug reported:

Не знаю

ProblemType: Package
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04
Package: libldap-2.4-2 2.4.28-1.1ubuntu4 [modified: 
usr/share/doc/libldap-2.4-2/changelog.Debian.gz]
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-27.43-generic 3.2.21
Uname: Linux 3.2.0-27-generic x86_64
NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia
ApportVersion: 2.0.1-0ubuntu12
Architecture: amd64
Date: Sat Aug  4 11:12:27 2012
ErrorMessage: libldap-2.4-2:amd64 2.4.28-1.1ubuntu4 cannot be configured 
because libldap-2.4-2
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 11.04 Natty Narwhal - Release amd64 (20110427)
SourcePackage: openldap
Title: package libldap-2.4-2 2.4.28-1.1ubuntu4 [modified: 
usr/share/doc/libldap-2.4-2/changelog.Debian.gz] failed to install/upgrade: 
libldap-2.4-2:amd64 2.4.28-1.1ubuntu4 cannot be configured because libldap-2.4-2
UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to precise on 2012-04-28 (97 days ago)

** Affects: openldap (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-package precise

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to openldap in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1032923

Title:
  package libldap-2.4-2 2.4.28-1.1ubuntu4 [modified:
  usr/share/doc/libldap-2.4-2/changelog.Debian.gz] failed to
  install/upgrade: libldap-2.4-2:amd64 2.4.28-1.1ubuntu4 cannot be
  configured because libldap-2.4-2

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openldap/+bug/1032923/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1032923] Re: package libldap-2.4-2 2.4.28-1.1ubuntu4 [modified: usr/share/doc/libldap-2.4-2/changelog.Debian.gz] failed to install/upgrade: libldap-2.4-2:amd64 2.4.28-1.1ubuntu4 cannot be configu

2012-08-04 Thread Олег
-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to openldap in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1032923

Title:
  package libldap-2.4-2 2.4.28-1.1ubuntu4 [modified:
  usr/share/doc/libldap-2.4-2/changelog.Debian.gz] failed to
  install/upgrade: libldap-2.4-2:amd64 2.4.28-1.1ubuntu4 cannot be
  configured because libldap-2.4-2

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openldap/+bug/1032923/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1029415] Re: package libldap-2.4-2 2.4.28-1.1ubuntu4 [modified: usr/share/doc/libldap-2.4-2/changelog.Debian.gz] failed to install/upgrade: libldap-2.4-2:amd64 2.4.28-1.1ubuntu4 cannot be configu

2012-08-04 Thread Clint Byrum
Hello Oleg, thanks for taking the time to file this bug report.

It looks like you have different versions of libldap-2.4-2 for i386
(32-bit) and amd64.

Its not clear how that happened, but there are two things you can try:

sudo apt-get -f install

This may fix the versions and get them in sync

Otherwise

sudo apt-get install libldap-2.4-2=2.4.28-1.1ubuntu4

That may also do it.

Either way, this is at worst a problem with dpkg or apt, not openldap,
and it looks like it is just a weird circumstance of package mixup on
your system that would likely be very hard to reproduce given the
information we have. I'm going to close this bug, but if you have more
information please feel free to open a new bug report or re-open this
bug by setting its status to New.

** Changed in: openldap (Ubuntu)
   Status: New = Invalid

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to openldap in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1029415

Title:
  package libldap-2.4-2 2.4.28-1.1ubuntu4 [modified:
  usr/share/doc/libldap-2.4-2/changelog.Debian.gz] failed to
  install/upgrade: libldap-2.4-2:amd64 2.4.28-1.1ubuntu4 cannot be
  configured because libldap-2.4-2

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openldap/+bug/1029415/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1027823] Re: defining a service with parameters leads to errors is service is remote

2012-08-04 Thread Clint Byrum
Hi Thomas, thanks for the excellent bug report!

I verified that this works fine in Nagios 3.4 from quantal, but is
broken in the Nagios from precise.

Its conceivable that the fix can be backported. The problem is that the
command is being called with everything from the ! to the eol as one
argument, so

exec('check_nrpe','-c','check_load','-a','40.0 32.0 28.0 48.0 40.0
36.0')

In 3.4 it gets called as

exec('check_nrpe','-c','check_load','-a','40.0','32.0','28.0','48.0','40.0,'36.0')


** Changed in: nagios3 (Ubuntu)
   Status: New = Confirmed

** Changed in: nagios3 (Ubuntu)
   Status: Confirmed = Fix Released

** Changed in: nagios3 (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided = Medium

** Also affects: nagios3 (Ubuntu Precise)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Changed in: nagios3 (Ubuntu Precise)
   Status: New = Triaged

** Changed in: nagios3 (Ubuntu Precise)
   Importance: Undecided = Medium

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nagios3 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1027823

Title:
  defining a service with parameters leads to errors is service is
  remote

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nagios3/+bug/1027823/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1029682] Re: python-greenlet-dbg does not contain required debug symbols

2012-08-04 Thread Clint Byrum
I see the same thing, marking as Confirmed/Medium

(precise-amd64)root@clint-MacBookPro:/home/clint# python2.7-dbg -c 'import 
greenlet'
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File string, line 1, in module
ImportError: /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/greenlet.so: undefined symbol: 
Py_InitModule4_64
[18263 refs]
(precise-amd64)root@clint-MacBookPro:/home/clint# dpkg -L python-greenlet-dbg
/.
/usr
/usr/lib
/usr/lib/debug
/usr/lib/debug/usr
/usr/lib/debug/usr/lib
/usr/lib/debug/usr/lib/python2.7
/usr/lib/debug/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages
/usr/lib/debug/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/greenlet.so
/usr/share
/usr/share/doc
/usr/share/doc/python-greenlet-dbg


** Changed in: python-greenlet (Ubuntu)
   Status: New = Fix Released

** Changed in: python-greenlet (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided = Medium

** Also affects: python-greenlet (Ubuntu Precise)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Changed in: python-greenlet (Ubuntu Precise)
   Status: New = Confirmed

** Changed in: python-greenlet (Ubuntu Precise)
   Importance: Undecided = Medium

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to python-greenlet in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1029682

Title:
  python-greenlet-dbg does not contain required debug symbols

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/python-greenlet/+bug/1029682/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 990751] Re: package slapd 2.4.28-1.1ubuntu4 failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1

2012-08-04 Thread Omar BOURAS
I got the same issue which I reported in
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openldap/+bug/999153/comments/4

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to openldap in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/990751

Title:
  package slapd 2.4.28-1.1ubuntu4 failed to install/upgrade:
  ErrorMessage: subprocess installed post-installation script returned
  error exit status 1

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openldap/+bug/990751/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1029760] Re: missing dependancy python-support

2012-08-04 Thread Clint Byrum
Hi Sam, thanks for taking the time to file a bug report. The version you
are reporting is not an official Ubuntu version of glance. For precise
these are the supported versions:

glance | 2012.1-0ubuntu2 |   precise | source, all
glance | 2012.1+stable~20120608-5462295-0ubuntu2.2 | precise-updates | 
source, all

And for Diablo (2011.3) these are the supported versions (only on
oneiric):

glance | 2011.3-0ubuntu4 |   oneiric | source, all
glance | 2011.3-0ubuntu4.1 | oneiric-updates | source, all

I would suggest you approach whomever has provided you with these
packages for support.

** Changed in: glance (Ubuntu)
   Status: New = Invalid

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to glance in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1029760

Title:
  missing dependancy python-support

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/glance/+bug/1029760/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1029769] Re: package snmpd 5.4.3~dfsg-2ubuntu1.1 failed to install/upgrade: Unterprozess installiertes post-installation-Skript gab den Fehlerwert 127 zurück

2012-08-04 Thread Clint Byrum
Hello Harald, thanks for taking the time to file a bug report.

I am not able to reproduce your issue. The symbold reported as missing
is in libsnmp15,  specifically /usr/lib/libsnmpagent.so.15.1.2

You may want to try reinstalling libsnmp15 and snmpd, try

sudo apt-get --reinstall install snmpd libsnmp15

If that does not work, please come back here and paste the output of
'ldd /usr/sbin/snmpd'

Marking Incomplete/Low for now.

** Changed in: net-snmp (Ubuntu)
   Status: New = Incomplete

** Changed in: net-snmp (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided = Low

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to net-snmp in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1029769

Title:
  package snmpd 5.4.3~dfsg-2ubuntu1.1 failed to install/upgrade:
  Unterprozess installiertes post-installation-Skript gab den Fehlerwert
  127 zurück

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/net-snmp/+bug/1029769/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1029817] Re: Please enable bash completion

2012-08-04 Thread Clint Byrum
Thanks James, marking as Triaged/Wishlist. You should propose a merge
into the packaging branch next.

** Changed in: python-novaclient (Ubuntu)
   Status: New = Triaged

** Changed in: python-novaclient (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided = Wishlist

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to python-novaclient in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1029817

Title:
  Please enable bash completion

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/python-novaclient/+bug/1029817/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1029766] Re: keystone logrotate has output when restarting keystone

2012-08-04 Thread Clint Byrum
For the Ubuntu packaging, you can

bzr branch lp:~ubuntu-server-dev/keystone/essex

edit the file (debian/keystone.logrotate)

Then propose merging.

I think.. not entirely sure if thats the workflow the team uses, but it
would be the usual Ubuntu packaging workflow.

Anyway, confirmed that this bug exists and needs fixing.

** Changed in: keystone (Ubuntu)
   Status: New = Triaged

** Changed in: keystone (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided = Medium

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to keystone in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1029766

Title:
  keystone logrotate has output when restarting keystone

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/keystone/+bug/1029766/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1026991] Re: package amavisd-new-postfix 1:2.6.5-0ubuntu3.1 failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1

2012-08-04 Thread Clint Byrum
Hi zodacare, thanks for taking the time to file a bug report.

Starting amavisd:   The value of variable $myhostname is ubuntu, but should 
have been
  a fully qualified domain name; perhaps uname(3) did not provide such.
  You must explicitly assign a FQDN of this host to variable $myhostname
  in /etc/amavis/conf.d/05-node_id, or fix what uname(3) provides as a host's 
  network name!
(failed).

This looks to be an error in your system configuration. Your server
needs a FQDN to work properly with amavisd, and the error is
intentional, so this is not a bug. If you have further information to
indicate it might be, please feel free to open a new bug report or re-
open this one by setting the status back to New.

** Changed in: amavisd-new (Ubuntu)
   Status: New = Invalid

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to amavisd-new in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1026991

Title:
  package amavisd-new-postfix 1:2.6.5-0ubuntu3.1 failed to
  install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: subprocess installed post-installation
  script returned error exit status 1

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/amavisd-new/+bug/1026991/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1029506] Re: package clamav-milter 0.97.3+dfsg-2.1ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1

2012-08-04 Thread Clint Byrum
Hi David. Thanks for taking the time to file this bug report. Your error
message is this:

Setting up clamav-milter (0.97.3+dfsg-2.1ubuntu1) ...
 * /usr/sbin/clamav-milter already running
invoke-rc.d: initscript clamav-milter, action start failed.
dpkg: error processing clamav-milter (--configure):
 subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1

This is odd as the preinstall script for clamav-milter stops the
service to make sure this does not happen. If you stopped any upgrades
or configuration half-way and rebooted, that might cause this.

Anyway, I don't see a bug we can address here, so I'm closing the
report. If you have more information that might suggest otherwise,
please feel free to re-open this bug report by changing the status back
to New.

** Changed in: clamav (Ubuntu)
   Status: New = Invalid

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to clamav in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1029506

Title:
  package clamav-milter 0.97.3+dfsg-2.1ubuntu1 failed to
  install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script
  returned error exit status 1

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/clamav/+bug/1029506/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1030266] Re: package mysql-server-5.5 5.5.24-0ubuntu0.12.04.1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1

2012-08-04 Thread Clint Byrum
Hello prathap, I believe you are missing the server configuration file:

 MySQLConf.etc.mysql.my.cnf: Error: [Errno 2] No such file or directory:
'/etc/mysql/my.cnf'

You can restore it by purging the package and re-installing, though that
may remove your data. You can also manually re-install the package with
this option:

sudo dpkg --force-confmiss -i /var/cache/apt/archives/mysql-
server-5.5_5.5.24-0ubuntu0.12.04.1_i386.deb

Anyway, I don't see a bug we can address here, as the system is working
as it is intended. Please feel free to re-open the bug report if you
have further information.

** Changed in: mysql-5.5 (Ubuntu)
   Status: New = Invalid

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to mysql-5.5 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1030266

Title:
  package mysql-server-5.5 5.5.24-0ubuntu0.12.04.1 failed to
  install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script
  returned error exit status 1

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mysql-5.5/+bug/1030266/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1032923] Re: package libldap-2.4-2 2.4.28-1.1ubuntu4 [modified: usr/share/doc/libldap-2.4-2/changelog.Debian.gz] failed to install/upgrade: libldap-2.4-2:amd64 2.4.28-1.1ubuntu4 cannot be configu

2012-08-04 Thread Clint Byrum
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1029415 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1029415

** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1029415
   package libldap-2.4-2 2.4.28-1.1ubuntu4 [modified: 
usr/share/doc/libldap-2.4-2/changelog.Debian.gz] failed to install/upgrade: 
libldap-2.4-2:amd64 2.4.28-1.1ubuntu4 cannot be configured because libldap-2.4-2

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to openldap in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1032923

Title:
  package libldap-2.4-2 2.4.28-1.1ubuntu4 [modified:
  usr/share/doc/libldap-2.4-2/changelog.Debian.gz] failed to
  install/upgrade: libldap-2.4-2:amd64 2.4.28-1.1ubuntu4 cannot be
  configured because libldap-2.4-2

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openldap/+bug/1032923/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1031395] Re: tomcat6 and tomcat7 are not installable side-by-side

2012-08-04 Thread Clint Byrum
Agreed, I believe alternatives should be used for the common files so
that users can select the default ones.

Here are the files that are common to both in quantal:

/usr/share/java/catalina-ant.jar
/usr/share/java/catalina-tribes.jar
/usr/share/java/tomcat-coyote.jar
/usr/share/java/tomcat-i18n-es.jar
/usr/share/java/tomcat-i18n-fr.jar
/usr/share/java/tomcat-i18n-ja.jar
/usr/share/java/tomcat-juli.jar

That said, its hard to recommend spending much time on tomcat6. One can
always use a chroot (see the 'schroot' package for a nice interface to
these) to serve them both from the same machine.

Setting to Confirmed/Wishlist

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to tomcat7 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1031395

Title:
  tomcat6 and tomcat7 are not installable side-by-side

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/tomcat7/+bug/1031395/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 498022] Re: Need package for php5 without suhosin patch

2012-08-04 Thread Leo Plotkin
This really needs to get addressed.  Migrating to Ubuntu server just
cost me half a day of debugging to find Suhosin patch is baked into the
executable and is *NOT* being disabled through either .htaccess or
php.ini methods.  I understand it's a good idea to provide this
additional security, but unfortunately the patch causes coredumps when
processing large xml files in Zend and other happy fun errors that are
simply not present in other Linux distributions.

Having to compile and maintain my own Suhosin-free packages is a
solution, but not a good one.

It's a good idea, but is definitely *NOT* ready as a default.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to php5 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/498022

Title:
  Need package for php5 without suhosin patch

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/php5/+bug/498022/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1031395] Re: tomcat6 and tomcat7 are not installable side-by-side

2012-08-04 Thread Clint Byrum
** Changed in: tomcat7 (Ubuntu)
   Status: New = Confirmed

** Changed in: tomcat7 (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided = Wishlist

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to tomcat7 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1031395

Title:
  tomcat6 and tomcat7 are not installable side-by-side

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/tomcat7/+bug/1031395/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1032721] Re: package slapd 2.4.28-1.1ubuntu4.1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1

2012-08-04 Thread Clint Byrum
Hi Jacques, thanks for filing the bug report.

Here is the relevant error:

Setting up slapd (2.4.28-1.1ubuntu4.1) ...
  Backing up /etc/ldap/slapd.d in /var/backups/slapd-2.4.28-1.1ubuntu4... done.
 * Starting OpenLDAP slapd    
[fail]
invoke-rc.d: initscript slapd, action start failed.


looks like slapd failed to start. Can you perhaps try looking in 
/var/log/syslog for any evidence as to why?

Marking Incomplete pending response.

** Changed in: openldap (Ubuntu)
   Status: New = Incomplete

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to openldap in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1032721

Title:
  package slapd 2.4.28-1.1ubuntu4.1 failed to install/upgrade:
  subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit
  status 1

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openldap/+bug/1032721/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1031795] Re: package postfix 2.9.3-2~12.04.1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1

2012-08-04 Thread Clint Byrum
Setting up postfix (2.9.3-2~12.04.1) ...

Postfix configuration was not changed.  If you need to make changes, edit
/etc/postfix/main.cf (and others) as needed.  To view Postfix configuration
values, see postconf(1).

After modifying main.cf, be sure to run '/etc/init.d/postfix reload'.

Running newaliases
 * Stopping Postfix Mail Transport Agent postfix    
[ OK ]
 * Starting Postfix Mail Transport Agent postfix    
postfix/postfix-script: fatal: the Postfix mail system is already running

Does that mean though that the restart action of the init script does
not actually make sure postfix is stopped? That seems like a bug. I
notice the command does:

if ! ${CMD} quiet-stop; then
RET=1
fi

and a RET of 1 would make it not print [OK], so it seems to me that the
quiet-stop command is not actually waiting for postfix to die.

** Changed in: postfix (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided = Medium

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to postfix in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1031795

Title:
  package postfix 2.9.3-2~12.04.1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess
  installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/postfix/+bug/1031795/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1032133] Re: smbclient fails if server does not support Echo request (eg. Time Capsule)

2012-08-04 Thread Clint Byrum
looks like this was fixed in samba 3.6.4, and so is fixed in Quantal
(3.6.6) but not in precise (3.6.3)

** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu)
   Status: New = Fix Released

** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided = High

** Also affects: samba (Ubuntu Precise)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu Precise)
   Status: New = Triaged

** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu Precise)
   Importance: Undecided = High

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1032133

Title:
   smbclient fails if server does not support Echo request (eg. Time
  Capsule)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/samba/+bug/1032133/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1028718] Re: nova volumes are inappropriately clingy for ceph

2012-08-04 Thread Clint Byrum
Hi Paul. You might be interested to hear about Cinder, which is meant to
be a better volume  management tool. Ceph's developers feel that the
approach being taken in Cinder will work better for ceph backed volumes.

This sounds like a legitmate issue with nova-volume, and since the bug
has effectively been forwarded upstream, I'm going to mark this bug in
Ubuntu as Triaged with a Medium importance. I'm also adding a task for
cinder so the developers can assess whether this is solved or even a
duplicate of something they're already working on.

** Changed in: nova (Ubuntu)
   Status: New = Triaged

** Changed in: nova (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided = Medium

** Also affects: cinder
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nova in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1028718

Title:
  nova volumes are inappropriately clingy for ceph

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/cinder/+bug/1028718/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1028981] Re: ceph should Recommend xfsprogs

2012-08-04 Thread Clint Byrum
Given that we have ceph 0.48 in Quantal, which uses leveldb for the
xattrs, perhaps ext4 is in fact going to be the preferred FS going
forward. Either way, this seems like a Medium priority.

** Changed in: ceph (Ubuntu)
   Status: New = Confirmed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to ceph in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1028981

Title:
  ceph should Recommend xfsprogs

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ceph/+bug/1028981/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1028585] Re: Memory allocation problem with ipvsadm

2012-08-04 Thread Clint Byrum
Cannot reproduce on Quantal.

$ sudo ipvsadm -A -t 10.248.8.73:80 -s rr
$

ipvsadm:
  Installed: 1:1.26-1ubuntu1
  Candidate: 1:1.26-1ubuntu1
  Version table:
 *** 1:1.26-1ubuntu1 0
500 http://us-west-2.ec2.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ quantal/main amd64 
Packages
100 /var/lib/dpkg/status

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to ipvsadm in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1028585

Title:
  Memory allocation problem with ipvsadm

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ipvsadm/+bug/1028585/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1028585] Re: Memory allocation problem with ipvsadm

2012-08-04 Thread Clint Byrum
Also could not reproduce on precise. I notice though that both systems
have been amd64 so perhaps this is specific to i386.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to ipvsadm in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1028585

Title:
  Memory allocation problem with ipvsadm

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ipvsadm/+bug/1028585/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1028280] Re: sftp remoteserver ls -l error

2012-08-04 Thread Clint Byrum
I was able to reproduce this with Precise's SSH, but not quantal's.

clint@clint-MacBookAir:~$ sftp 
ubu...@ec2-54-245-13-189.us-west-2.compute.amazonaws.com
Connected to ec2-54-245-13-189.us-west-2.compute.amazonaws.com.
sftp ls -l *txt
-rw-rw-r--0 1000 1000 3764 Aug  4 17:29 tc.a.txt
-rw-rw-r--0 1000 1000 5544 Aug  4 17:29 tc_a.txt
sftp ls -l tc.a.txt
-rw-rw-r--0 1000 1000 5544 Aug  4 17:29 tc.a.txt
sftp ls -l tc_a.txt
-rw-rw-r--0 1000 1000 3764 Aug  4 17:29 tc_a.txt
sftp 

on quantal:

sftp ls -l *txt
-rw-rw-r--0 1000 1000 3764 Aug  4 17:29 tc_a.txt
-rw-rw-r--0 1000 1000 5544 Aug  4 17:29 tc.a.txt
sftp ls -l tc_a.txt
-rw-rw-r--0 1000 1000 3764 Aug  4 17:29 tc_a.txt
sftp ls -l tc.a.txt
-rw-rw-r--0 1000 1000 5544 Aug  4 17:29 tc.a.txt
sftp

So, marking Fix Released but opening a task against precise to do an
SRU. I'm sure the patch can be found between ssh 5.9 and ssh 6.0

** Also affects: openssh (Ubuntu Precise)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Changed in: openssh (Ubuntu)
   Status: New = Fix Released

** Changed in: openssh (Ubuntu Precise)
   Status: New = Triaged

** Changed in: openssh (Ubuntu Precise)
   Importance: Undecided = High

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to openssh in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1028280

Title:
  sftp remoteserver ls -l error

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openssh/+bug/1028280/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1033096] [NEW] request to have sha2 module in contrib included in package

2012-08-04 Thread ben thielsen
Public bug reported:

there is an sha2 module in the openldap source contrib directory which
implements the following sha2 password hashing schemes:

{SSHA-512}
{SSHA-384}
{SSHA-256}
{SHA-512}
{SHA-384}
{SHA-256}

i'd like to have it included in the slapd package.

the module can be found in contrib/slapd-modules/passwd/sha2/

following the standard make depend when building openldap, the module
can be built by running make in its directory.  note that i had to add
-fPIC to CCFLAGS in order to get it to build - e.g:

CCFLAGS = -Wall -g -fPIC

this may or may not be the right way to do this.

regards
-ben

** Affects: openldap (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to openldap in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1033096

Title:
  request to have sha2 module in contrib included in package

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openldap/+bug/1033096/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1032181] Re: sensord fail to create correct RRD file when loadavg requested

2012-08-04 Thread Panos Georgiadis
** Changed in: lm-sensors (Ubuntu)
   Status: New = Fix Committed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to lm-sensors in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1032181

Title:
  sensord fail to create correct RRD file when loadavg requested

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lm-sensors/+bug/1032181/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1017911] Re: package libsensors4 1:3.3.1-2ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: conffile './etc/sensors.d/.placeholder' is not in sync with other instances of the same package

2012-08-04 Thread Panos Georgiadis
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 987714 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/987714

** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 951493
   package libsensors4 1:3.3.1-2ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: conffile 
'./etc/sensors.d/.placeholder' is not in sync with other instances of the same 
package
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 987714
   package libsensors4 1:3.3.1-2ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: conffile 
'./etc/sensors.d/.placeholder' is not in sync with other instances of the same 
package

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to lm-sensors in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1017911

Title:
  package libsensors4 1:3.3.1-2ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade:
  conffile './etc/sensors.d/.placeholder' is not in sync with other
  instances of the same package

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lm-sensors/+bug/1017911/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 999785] Re: package libsensors4 1:3.3.1-2ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: conffile './etc/sensors.d/.placeholder' is not in sync with other instances of the same package

2012-08-04 Thread Panos Georgiadis
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 987714 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/987714

** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 951493
   package libsensors4 1:3.3.1-2ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: conffile 
'./etc/sensors.d/.placeholder' is not in sync with other instances of the same 
package
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 987714
   package libsensors4 1:3.3.1-2ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: conffile 
'./etc/sensors.d/.placeholder' is not in sync with other instances of the same 
package

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to lm-sensors in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/999785

Title:
  package libsensors4 1:3.3.1-2ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade:
  conffile './etc/sensors.d/.placeholder' is not in sync with other
  instances of the same package

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lm-sensors/+bug/999785/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 999710] Re: package libsensors4 1:3.3.1-2ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: conffile './etc/sensors.d/.placeholder' is not in sync with other instances of the same package

2012-08-04 Thread Panos Georgiadis
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 987714 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/987714

** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 951493
   package libsensors4 1:3.3.1-2ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: conffile 
'./etc/sensors.d/.placeholder' is not in sync with other instances of the same 
package
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 987714
   package libsensors4 1:3.3.1-2ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: conffile 
'./etc/sensors.d/.placeholder' is not in sync with other instances of the same 
package

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to lm-sensors in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/999710

Title:
  package libsensors4 1:3.3.1-2ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade:
  conffile './etc/sensors.d/.placeholder' is not in sync with other
  instances of the same package

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lm-sensors/+bug/999710/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 999397] Re: package libsensors4 1:3.3.1-2ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: conffile './etc/sensors.d/.placeholder' is not in sync with other instances of the same package

2012-08-04 Thread Panos Georgiadis
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 987714 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/987714

** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 951493
   package libsensors4 1:3.3.1-2ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: conffile 
'./etc/sensors.d/.placeholder' is not in sync with other instances of the same 
package
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 987714
   package libsensors4 1:3.3.1-2ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: conffile 
'./etc/sensors.d/.placeholder' is not in sync with other instances of the same 
package

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to lm-sensors in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/999397

Title:
  package libsensors4 1:3.3.1-2ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade:
  conffile './etc/sensors.d/.placeholder' is not in sync with other
  instances of the same package

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lm-sensors/+bug/999397/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 998337] Re: package libsensors4 1:3.3.1-2ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: conffile './etc/sensors.d/.placeholder' is not in sync with other instances of the same package

2012-08-04 Thread Panos Georgiadis
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 987714 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/987714

** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 951493
   package libsensors4 1:3.3.1-2ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: conffile 
'./etc/sensors.d/.placeholder' is not in sync with other instances of the same 
package
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 987714
   package libsensors4 1:3.3.1-2ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: conffile 
'./etc/sensors.d/.placeholder' is not in sync with other instances of the same 
package

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to lm-sensors in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/998337

Title:
  package libsensors4 1:3.3.1-2ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade:
  conffile './etc/sensors.d/.placeholder' is not in sync with other
  instances of the same package

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lm-sensors/+bug/998337/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 980054] Re: package libsensors4 1:3.3.1-2ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: conffile './etc/sensors.d/.placeholder' is not in sync with other instances of the same package

2012-08-04 Thread Panos Georgiadis
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 987714 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/987714

** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 951493
   package libsensors4 1:3.3.1-2ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: conffile 
'./etc/sensors.d/.placeholder' is not in sync with other instances of the same 
package
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 987714
   package libsensors4 1:3.3.1-2ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: conffile 
'./etc/sensors.d/.placeholder' is not in sync with other instances of the same 
package

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to lm-sensors in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/980054

Title:
  package libsensors4 1:3.3.1-2ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade:
  conffile './etc/sensors.d/.placeholder' is not in sync with other
  instances of the same package

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lm-sensors/+bug/980054/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 951493] Re: package libsensors4 1:3.3.1-2ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: conffile './etc/sensors.d/.placeholder' is not in sync with other instances of the same package

2012-08-04 Thread Panos Georgiadis
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 987714 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/987714

** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 987714
   package libsensors4 1:3.3.1-2ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: conffile 
'./etc/sensors.d/.placeholder' is not in sync with other instances of the same 
package

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to lm-sensors in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/951493

Title:
  package libsensors4 1:3.3.1-2ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade:
  conffile './etc/sensors.d/.placeholder' is not in sync with other
  instances of the same package

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lm-sensors/+bug/951493/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 967410] Re: Windows clients cannot connect to shared printers

2012-08-04 Thread David
jmsfnch (jamesfinch), if you still have problems with
WERR_ACCESS_DENIED added in the section [printers] in
/etc/samba/smb.conf as follows:  valid users = james

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/967410

Title:
  Windows clients cannot connect to shared printers

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/967410/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 990396] Re: package samba 2:3.6.3-2ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1

2012-08-04 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
[Expired for samba (Ubuntu) because there has been no activity for 60
days.]

** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu)
   Status: Incomplete = Expired

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/990396

Title:
  package samba 2:3.6.3-2ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess
  installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/990396/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1032901] Re: [Xorg-edgers] DKMS make for Nvidia 304.30 and Linux Kernel 3.5.0-7-generic hard fail...

2012-08-04 Thread AG Restringere
One more detail is that I did:   'apt-file search system.h | grep
asm/system.h'

linux-headers-3.2.0-27: 
/usr/src/linux-headers-3.2.0-27/arch/alpha/include/asm/system.h
linux-headers-3.2.0-27: 
/usr/src/linux-headers-3.2.0-27/arch/arm/include/asm/system.h
linux-headers-3.2.0-27: 
/usr/src/linux-headers-3.2.0-27/arch/avr32/include/asm/system.h
linux-headers-3.2.0-27: 
/usr/src/linux-headers-3.2.0-27/arch/blackfin/include/asm/system.h
linux-headers-3.2.0-27: 
/usr/src/linux-headers-3.2.0-27/arch/cris/include/asm/system.h
linux-headers-3.2.0-27: 
/usr/src/linux-headers-3.2.0-27/arch/frv/include/asm/system.h
linux-headers-3.2.0-27: 
/usr/src/linux-headers-3.2.0-27/arch/h8300/include/asm/system.h
linux-headers-3.2.0-27: 
/usr/src/linux-headers-3.2.0-27/arch/hexagon/include/asm/system.h
linux-headers-3.2.0-27: 
/usr/src/linux-headers-3.2.0-27/arch/ia64/include/asm/system.h
linux-headers-3.2.0-27: 
/usr/src/linux-headers-3.2.0-27/arch/m32r/include/asm/system.h
linux-headers-3.2.0-27: 
/usr/src/linux-headers-3.2.0-27/arch/m68k/include/asm/system.h
linux-headers-3.2.0-27: 
/usr/src/linux-headers-3.2.0-27/arch/microblaze/include/asm/system.h
linux-headers-3.2.0-27: 
/usr/src/linux-headers-3.2.0-27/arch/mips/include/asm/system.h
linux-headers-3.2.0-27: 
/usr/src/linux-headers-3.2.0-27/arch/mn10300/include/asm/system.h
linux-headers-3.2.0-27: 
/usr/src/linux-headers-3.2.0-27/arch/openrisc/include/asm/system.h
linux-headers-3.2.0-27: 
/usr/src/linux-headers-3.2.0-27/arch/parisc/include/asm/system.h
linux-headers-3.2.0-27: 
/usr/src/linux-headers-3.2.0-27/arch/powerpc/include/asm/system.h
linux-headers-3.2.0-27: 
/usr/src/linux-headers-3.2.0-27/arch/s390/include/asm/system.h
linux-headers-3.2.0-27: 
/usr/src/linux-headers-3.2.0-27/arch/score/include/asm/system.h
linux-headers-3.2.0-27: 
/usr/src/linux-headers-3.2.0-27/arch/sh/include/asm/system.h
linux-headers-3.2.0-27: 
/usr/src/linux-headers-3.2.0-27/arch/sparc/include/asm/system.h
linux-headers-3.2.0-27: 
/usr/src/linux-headers-3.2.0-27/arch/tile/include/asm/system.h
linux-headers-3.2.0-27: 
/usr/src/linux-headers-3.2.0-27/arch/unicore32/include/asm/system.h
linux-headers-3.2.0-27: 
/usr/src/linux-headers-3.2.0-27/arch/x86/include/asm/system.h
linux-headers-3.2.0-27: 
/usr/src/linux-headers-3.2.0-27/arch/xtensa/include/asm/system.h

For some reason for version 'linux-headers-3.2.0-27' there doesn't
appear to be a x86_64 system.h, but it could be above and I am not
seeing it and x86 is standard for all x86 i386 and x86_64.   This is
strange that it was not present in Kernel version linux-
headers-3.5.0-7-generic and the installer script could not find it...

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1032901

Title:
  [Xorg-edgers] DKMS make for Nvidia 304.30 and Linux Kernel
  3.5.0-7-generic hard fail...

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/linux/+bug/1032901/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1032901] Re: [Xorg-edgers] DKMS make for Nvidia 304.30 and Linux Kernel 3.5.0-7-generic hard fail...

2012-08-04 Thread AG Restringere
** Attachment added: /home/user/log/apt/term.log
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/linux-kernel-bugs/+bug/1032901/+attachment/3247332/+files/term.log

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1032901

Title:
  [Xorg-edgers] DKMS make for Nvidia 304.30 and Linux Kernel
  3.5.0-7-generic hard fail...

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/linux/+bug/1032901/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1032901] Re: [Xorg-edgers] DKMS make for Nvidia 304.30 and Linux Kernel 3.5.0-7-generic hard fail...

2012-08-04 Thread AG Restringere
** Attachment added: /var/lib/dkms/nvidia-current/295.40/build/make.log
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/linux-kernel-bugs/+bug/1032901/+attachment/3247334/+files/make.log

** Also affects: nvidia-drivers-ubuntu
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1032901

Title:
  [Xorg-edgers] DKMS make for Nvidia 304.30 and Linux Kernel
  3.5.0-7-generic hard fail...

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/linux/+bug/1032901/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 981289] Re: Window list entries colored in white instead of dark (GNOME Classic / Ambiance theme)

2012-08-04 Thread Whoopie
Please find a debdiff for precise-proposed

** Patch added: light-themes_0.1.9.1-0ubuntu1.1.debdiff
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/light-themes/+bug/981289/+attachment/3247336/+files/light-themes_0.1.9.1-0ubuntu1.1.debdiff

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/981289

Title:
  Window list entries colored in white instead of dark (GNOME Classic /
  Ambiance theme)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/light-themes/+bug/981289/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 842683] Re: Dash does not maximize using keyboard shortcuts

2012-08-04 Thread Owais Lone
@Kim,

Compiz has shortcuts for maximize, restore and toggle between these two
states. My solution that dash should just use whatever shortcuts we set
in compiz.


@Bilal,
Doesn't matter what they are bound to perform an action. Dash still does not 
respond to them.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/842683

Title:
  Dash does not maximize using keyboard shortcuts

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ayatana-design/+bug/842683/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1032024] Re: Please upgrade lighttpd to 1.4.31

2012-08-04 Thread kroq-gar78
** Tags added: upgrade-software-version

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1032024

Title:
  Please upgrade lighttpd to 1.4.31

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lighttpd/+bug/1032024/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1028865] Re: Text is pixelated when printing

2012-08-04 Thread Romeo Dragnea
Thank you!
I tried with 360X360 and it is printing in the same way, text is pixaleted. 
Tried with 720X360 now the font is distorted, big and pixelated.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1028865

Title:
  Text is pixelated when printing

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gutenprint/+bug/1028865/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1025553] Re: Plugin fails to load in Chrome

2012-08-04 Thread Steve Beattie
Attached is a debdiff for quantal to address this issue plus the two
recent security updates fixed in the upstream IcedTea-Web 1.2.1 release
(already address in the stable ubuntu releases). Ideally, I'd rather see
this get sync'ed from debian, but I'm not sure they'll pull in 1.2.1
during their freeze.

** Patch added: icedtea-web_1.2-2ubuntu2.debdiff
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/icedtea-web/+bug/1025553/+attachment/3247337/+files/icedtea-web_1.2-2ubuntu2.debdiff

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1025553

Title:
  Plugin fails to load in Chrome

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/icedtea/+bug/1025553/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1025553] Re: Plugin fails to load in Chrome

2012-08-04 Thread Steve Beattie
Here is a debdiff for a precise SRU for this as well as a fix for bug
1002516.

** Patch added: icedtea-web_1.2-2ubuntu1.2.debdiff
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/icedtea-web/+bug/1025553/+attachment/3247338/+files/icedtea-web_1.2-2ubuntu1.2.debdiff

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1025553

Title:
  Plugin fails to load in Chrome

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/icedtea/+bug/1025553/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1025553] Re: Plugin fails to load in Chrome

2012-08-04 Thread Steve Beattie
And finally, a debdiff for a natty SRU for this issue.

** Patch added: icedtea-web_1.2-2ubuntu0.11.04.3.debdiff
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/icedtea-web/+bug/1025553/+attachment/3247340/+files/icedtea-web_1.2-2ubuntu0.11.04.3.debdiff

** Description changed:

  OS: Ubuntu 11.04 Natty amd64
  Browser: Chrome 20.0.1132.57
  Affected file(s): /usr/lib/jvm/java-6-openjdk/jre/lib/amd64/IcedTeaPlugin.so
- 
  
  Problem: Plugin fails to load in Chrome.
  There is a bug in the IcedTeaPlugin.so that has already been adressed by Adam 
Domurad adomu...@redhat.com
  Updating the plugin to the latest release (IcedTea-Web 
1.2.1pre+rd5cec52b3c5b) as described here: 
http://icedtea.classpath.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1073 fixes this issue.
  
  Solution: Needs repackaging.
  
- Regards
+ TESTCASE
+ 1) install icedtea-6-plugin and chromium-browser
+ 2) open chromium-browser and navigate to 
http://www.java.com/de/download/help/testvm.xml
+ if the icedtea plugin is working, a fancy little graphic will show up in the 
middle of the webpage; if it's not working, the center will remain blank, and 
if chromium-browser was started in a terminal, lines similar to the following 
will appear there:
+ 
+   
/build/buildd/icedtea-web-1.2/build/../plugin/icedteanp/IcedTeaNPPlugin.cc:2072:
 thread 0x7f926a3a8500: Error: Invalid plugin function table.
+   
/build/buildd/icedtea-web-1.2/build/../plugin/icedteanp/IcedTeaNPPlugin.cc:2072:
 thread 0x7f926a3a8500: Error: Invalid plugin function table.
+   
/build/buildd/icedtea-web-1.2/build/../plugin/icedteanp/IcedTeaNPPlugin.cc:2072:
 thread 0x7f926a3a8500: Error: Invalid plugin function table.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1025553

Title:
  Plugin fails to load in Chrome

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/icedtea/+bug/1025553/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 981289] Re: Window list entries colored in white instead of dark (GNOME Classic / Ambiance theme)

2012-08-04 Thread Whoopie
Sorry, debdiff doesn't work, the build dependencies for quilt are
missing.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/981289

Title:
  Window list entries colored in white instead of dark (GNOME Classic /
  Ambiance theme)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/light-themes/+bug/981289/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 470037] Re: sudo tab autocomplete shows erratic behavior with spaces in names

2012-08-04 Thread kroq-gar78
Still in Ubuntu 12.04 release as of August 3, 2012

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/470037

Title:
  sudo tab autocomplete shows erratic behavior with spaces in names

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bash-completion/+bug/470037/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 382037] Re: Bash-completion fails to parse spaces for umount

2012-08-04 Thread kroq-gar78
Can't confirm this problem with Ubuntu 12.04 because I have the issue in
bug 470037 instead

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/382037

Title:
  Bash-completion fails to parse spaces for umount

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bash-completion/+bug/382037/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1030292] Re: initramfs does not boot with mdadm (3.2.5-1ubuntu0.1)

2012-08-04 Thread Steve Langasek
** Also affects: mdadm (Ubuntu Precise)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Also affects: mdadm (Ubuntu Quantal)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: Incomplete

** Changed in: mdadm (Ubuntu Quantal)
   Status: Incomplete = Triaged

** Changed in: mdadm (Ubuntu Precise)
   Status: New = In Progress

** Changed in: mdadm (Ubuntu Precise)
 Assignee: (unassigned) = Steve Langasek (vorlon)

** Changed in: mdadm (Ubuntu Precise)
   Importance: Undecided = High

** Changed in: mdadm (Ubuntu Quantal)
   Importance: Undecided = Critical

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1030292

Title:
  initramfs does not boot with mdadm (3.2.5-1ubuntu0.1)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mdadm/+bug/1030292/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1028865] Re: Text is pixelated when printing

2012-08-04 Thread Till Kamppeter
This means that using a higher resolution setting does not improve the
situation?

Can you attach an error_log for 360x360 dpi and for 720x360 dpi?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1028865

Title:
  Text is pixelated when printing

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gutenprint/+bug/1028865/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 964365] Re: Weather indicator as earthtools.org is down

2012-08-04 Thread Normand C
I get the same error with GDebi but the package installs nonetheless.

indicator-weather now updates, but the icon is tuck to a yellow sun (see
#34 comment by Colin Keegan).

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/964365

Title:
  Weather indicator as earthtools.org is down

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/weather-indicator/+bug/964365/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1025553] Re: Plugin fails to load in Chrome

2012-08-04 Thread Steve Beattie
Here is a similar debdiff for an Oneiric SRU that only addresses this
issue.

** Patch added: icedtea-web_1.2-2ubuntu0.11.10.3.debdiff
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/icedtea-web/+bug/1025553/+attachment/3247339/+files/icedtea-web_1.2-2ubuntu0.11.10.3.debdiff

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1025553

Title:
  Plugin fails to load in Chrome

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/icedtea/+bug/1025553/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1015157] Re: Dogtail recorder does not start, SPI Exception

2012-08-04 Thread Patrick Hendrickx
Experiencing exactly the same problem on Ubuntu 12.04

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1015157

Title:
  Dogtail recorder does not start, SPI Exception

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dogtail/+bug/1015157/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1015157] Re: Dogtail recorder does not start, SPI Exception

2012-08-04 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
Status changed to 'Confirmed' because the bug affects multiple users.

** Changed in: dogtail (Ubuntu)
   Status: New = Confirmed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1015157

Title:
  Dogtail recorder does not start, SPI Exception

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dogtail/+bug/1015157/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1030292] Re: initramfs does not boot with mdadm (3.2.5-1ubuntu0.1)

2012-08-04 Thread Steve Langasek
** Description changed:

+ [Impact]
+ This is an SRU regression confined to precise-proposed.  Reverting part of 
the upstream changes is sufficient to resolve this for precise.  The issue 
remains unfixed in quantal; this is not a blocker for the SRU.
+ 
+ [Test case]
+ Verify that the submitter's machine boots successfully with the latest mdadm 
installed.
+ 
+ [Regression potential]
+ Since the existing mdadm in precise does not do auto-assembly of imsm or ddf 
arrays using udev rules, the risk of regression by continuing to not assemble 
them is minimal.  Only risk of regression is a mis-edit causing some other 
array, previously handled correctly in precise, to no longer be assembled; the 
risk of this is very small.
+ 
  After upgrading to the mdadm in precise-proposed, all newly created
  initrds do not boot. I'm using a pseudo raid with to harddisks on a Sony
  Vaio Z. Raid level is 0.  I have one  unencrypted boot partition and an
  encrypted root.
  
  During startup the system asks for the password to decrypt the root
  partition as usual but fails to mount the partition afterwards. I always
  get the message that there are one or more degraded partitions. However,
  with an older version of mdadm everything works perfectly.
  
  My current solution: Downgrade to latest stable mdadm (precise).
  
  Please let me know what additional information is required. I can also 
perform some tests as long as my (prodcutive) system is not in danger.
- --- 
+ ---
  ApportVersion: 2.0.1-0ubuntu12
  Architecture: amd64
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 11.10 Oneiric Ocelot - Release amd64 (20111011)
  MDadmExamine.dev.sda: Error: command ['/sbin/mdadm', '-E', '/dev/sda'] failed 
with exit code 1: mdadm: cannot open /dev/sda: Permission denied
  MDadmExamine.dev.sdb: Error: command ['/sbin/mdadm', '-E', '/dev/sdb'] failed 
with exit code 1: mdadm: cannot open /dev/sdb: Permission denied
  MDadmExamine.dev.sdc: Error: command ['/sbin/mdadm', '-E', '/dev/sdc'] failed 
with exit code 1: mdadm: cannot open /dev/sdc: Permission denied
  MachineType: Sony Corporation VPCZ21C5E
  Package: mdadm 3.2.3-2ubuntu1
  PackageArchitecture: amd64
  ProcEnviron:
-  LANGUAGE=en_US:en
-  TERM=xterm
-  PATH=(custom, user)
-  LANG=en_US.UTF-8
-  SHELL=/bin/bash
+  LANGUAGE=en_US:en
+  TERM=xterm
+  PATH=(custom, user)
+  LANG=en_US.UTF-8
+  SHELL=/bin/bash
  ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/vmlinuz-3.5.0-6-generic 
root=/dev/mapper/volumegrp01-root ro ^ kopt=root=/dev/mapper/volumegrp01-root 
quiet splash video=intelfb pcie_aspm=force i915.i915_enable_rc6=1 
i915.lvds_downclock=1 i915.i915_enable_fbc=1 vt.handoff=7
  ProcMDstat:
-  Personalities : [linear] [multipath] [raid0] [raid1] [raid6] [raid5] [raid4] 
[raid10] 
-  unused devices: none
+  Personalities : [linear] [multipath] [raid0] [raid1] [raid6] [raid5] [raid4] 
[raid10]
+  unused devices: none
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.5.0-6.6~precise1-generic 3.5.0
  Tags:  precise
  Uname: Linux 3.5.0-6-generic x86_64
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
  UserGroups: adm admin audio cdrom debian-tor dialout lpadmin plugdev 
sambashare
  dmi.bios.date: 02/09/2012
  dmi.bios.vendor: INSYDE
  dmi.bios.version: R0172H5
  dmi.board.asset.tag: N/A
  dmi.board.name: VAIO
  dmi.board.vendor: Sony Corporation
  dmi.board.version: N/A
  dmi.chassis.asset.tag: N/A
  dmi.chassis.type: 10
  dmi.chassis.vendor: Sony Corporation
  dmi.chassis.version: N/A
  dmi.modalias: 
dmi:bvnINSYDE:bvrR0172H5:bd02/09/2012:svnSonyCorporation:pnVPCZ21C5E:pvrJ004PS0X:rvnSonyCorporation:rnVAIO:rvrN/A:cvnSonyCorporation:ct10:cvrN/A:
  dmi.product.name: VPCZ21C5E
  dmi.product.version: J004PS0X
  dmi.sys.vendor: Sony Corporation
  etc.blkid.tab: Error: [Errno 2] No such file or directory: '/etc/blkid.tab'

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1030292

Title:
  initramfs does not boot with mdadm (3.2.5-1ubuntu0.1)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mdadm/+bug/1030292/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 981289] Re: Window list entries colored in white instead of dark (GNOME Classic / Ambiance theme)

2012-08-04 Thread Whoopie
Please find attache the correct debdiff for precise-proposed.

** Patch removed: light-themes_0.1.9.1-0ubuntu1.1.debdiff
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/light-themes/+bug/981289/+attachment/3247336/+files/light-themes_0.1.9.1-0ubuntu1.1.debdiff

** Patch added: light-themes_0.1.9.1-0ubuntu1.1.debdiff
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/light-themes/+bug/981289/+attachment/3247353/+files/light-themes_0.1.9.1-0ubuntu1.1.debdiff

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/981289

Title:
  Window list entries colored in white instead of dark (GNOME Classic /
  Ambiance theme)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/light-themes/+bug/981289/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 831768] [PATCH] aptitude: resolver always removes foreign-arch packages

2012-08-04 Thread Daniel Hartwig
Attached patch updates the problem resolver to better handle
multi-arch situations so that it no longer gets stuck trying to remove
all foreign-arch packages.

Affected users and interested persons should perform testing and
review on this.  The changes are relatively small but there is room
for regressions in complex dependency situations.

The patch has been developed and tested with aptitude 0.6.8.

If this works or does not work for you please comment, particularly if
you experience regressions.


** Attachment added: multiarch-conflicts.patch
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/831768/+attachment/3247354/+files/multiarch-conflicts.patch

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/831768

Title:
  aptitude cannot handle conflicts with multiarch enabled

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/aptitude/+bug/831768/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1021308] Re: software-center crashed with AttributeError in do_draw(): 'PackageStatusBar' object has no attribute '_border_width'

2012-08-04 Thread Xavier Besnard
Same problem with Kubuntu 12.10 Quantal alpha 3 including KDE 4.9. Dayly
udate.

No trace available. Sorry

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1021308

Title:
  software-center crashed with AttributeError in do_draw():
  'PackageStatusBar' object has no attribute '_border_width'

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/software-center/+bug/1021308/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1025638] Re: frequent disconnects

2012-08-04 Thread Rolf Leggewie
Christopher, may I kindly suggest you speak for yourself?  Furthermore,
where exactly is the CoC-violation in comment 26?  You are throwing
around a bunch of stuff without merit, I'd say.

The link you gave says Bugs which are not legitimate bugs are set to
Invalid. This can include bugs which failed to provide requested debug
information or bugs which are the result of user error.  You are
requesting an ever increasing amount information that is by now simply
IMPOSSIBLE to provide.  You are not seriously requesting for me to
contact the airport and ask them for what model of AP they deployed or
else you will not act on this ticket?  What if they have more than one
AP, will I need to find out which particular brand I had connected to?
Last time I heard, it was that 802.11x was a standard.  I think for now
it's safe to assume that the AP is following the standard.  HKG is a
busy and well-maintained airport, I'm sure that if there was a genuine
problem with their setup, they would hear about it and fix it.  But not
only that, you will not do anything unless I can prove this is a
regression?  How am I supposed to know? It's the first time I ran into
this issue and I reported it the first time I came across it.  Do you
want me to test every kernel that was ever released?  I guess that's the
next step, hm?

You might not like to hear this but you are being ridiculous with your
requests.  Is this the new kernel bug triaging team policy, to request
an ever increasing amount of information so that you can happily close
the ticket as invalid when it's not provided? I already provided a bunch
of unnecessary information and pointed out the violation of the
principle of Datensparsamkeit.

I understand and agree that it would be nice to see if the problem does
occur in mainline as well, but at the moment it's impossible to verify
that.  That doesn't make this ticket invalid.  In fact, the link you
provided, explicitly states 'If a bug is in a Confirmed state but has
not yet tested the upstream mainline kernel, tag the bug needs-
upstream-testing. If a bug has been tested with the upstream kernel,
move the bug to a Triaged state.'  So, confirmed is the proper state
of this ticket, the tag is already there.  I'm quoting officially
published rules, you seem to make up your own along the way, handing out
links that do not support or in fact often even contradict your
arguments.

I might go to HKG again next month or at the end of October or both.  If
I do, I will be sure to test mainline.  If there is any other tests you
expect, let me know ahead of time.  I suggest you close this ticket as
invalid no earlier than in 120 days as seems to be kernel team
expiration policy for information requested bugs.  I won't object to
setting this ticket to incomplete if that made you happier.

** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
   Status: Invalid = Confirmed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1025638

Title:
  frequent disconnects

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1025638/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1011073] Re: NetworkManager submenus sometimes unpopulated

2012-08-04 Thread onyxrev
Unfortunately (fortunately?) I haven't seen this bug in at least a week
or so but I will certainly try to provide valgrind logs if I do.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1011073

Title:
  NetworkManager submenus sometimes unpopulated

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/network-manager/+bug/1011073/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 892768] Re: Slow boot with ata4.00: failed command: IDENTIFY PACKET DEVICE in log.

2012-08-04 Thread David Beswick
Just popping in to say that this issue continues to affect 12.04.

Linux desktop 3.2.0-27-generic #43-Ubuntu SMP Fri Jul 6 14:25:57 UTC
2012 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux

Distributor ID: Ubuntu
Description:Ubuntu 12.04 LTS
Release:12.04
Codename:   precise

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/892768

Title:
  Slow boot with ata4.00: failed command: IDENTIFY PACKET DEVICE in log.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/udev/+bug/892768/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1015593] Re: crash in gtk-windows-decorator meta_get_button_position

2012-08-04 Thread Miklos Juhasz
Using the latest proposed package Alt works as expected. No crash.

** Tags removed: verification-needed
** Tags added: verification-done

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1015593

Title:
  crash in gtk-windows-decorator meta_get_button_position

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/compiz/+bug/1015593/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 929989] Re: compiz (decor) - Warn: failed to bind pixmap to texture

2012-08-04 Thread Miklos Juhasz
The proposed package fixed the issue.

** Tags removed: verification-needed
** Tags added: verification-done

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/929989

Title:
  compiz (decor) - Warn: failed to bind pixmap to texture

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/compiz/+bug/929989/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1030292] Re: initramfs does not boot with mdadm (3.2.5-1ubuntu0.1)

2012-08-04 Thread Adam Conrad
Hello Eike, or anyone else affected,

Accepted mdadm into precise-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at http://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mdadm/3.2.5-1ubuntu0.2
in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.

Please help us by testing this new package.  See
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation how to
enable and use -proposed.  Your feedback will aid us getting this update
out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please change the bug tag from
verification-needed to verification-done.  If it does not, change the
tag to verification-failed.  In either case, details of your testing
will help us make a better decision.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification .  Thank you in
advance!

** Changed in: mdadm (Ubuntu Precise)
   Status: In Progress = Fix Committed

** Tags added: verification-needed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1030292

Title:
  initramfs does not boot with mdadm (3.2.5-1ubuntu0.1)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mdadm/+bug/1030292/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1022915] Re: mdadm in precise does not allow internal bitmap on version 1.2 arrays

2012-08-04 Thread Adam Conrad
Hello costin, or anyone else affected,

Accepted mdadm into precise-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at http://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mdadm/3.2.5-1ubuntu0.2
in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.

Please help us by testing this new package.  See
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation how to
enable and use -proposed.  Your feedback will aid us getting this update
out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please change the bug tag from
verification-needed to verification-done.  If it does not, change the
tag to verification-failed.  In either case, details of your testing
will help us make a better decision.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification .  Thank you in
advance!

** Tags removed: verification-done

** Tags added: verification-needed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1022915

Title:
  mdadm in precise does not allow internal bitmap on version 1.2 arrays

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mdadm/+bug/1022915/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1017407] Please test proposed package

2012-08-04 Thread Adam Conrad
Hello Dmitrijs, or anyone else affected,

Accepted mdadm into precise-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at http://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mdadm/3.2.5-1ubuntu0.2
in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.

Please help us by testing this new package.  See
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation how to
enable and use -proposed.  Your feedback will aid us getting this update
out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please change the bug tag from
verification-needed to verification-done.  If it does not, change the
tag to verification-failed.  In either case, details of your testing
will help us make a better decision.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification .  Thank you in
advance!

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1017407

Title:
  should copy /etc/udev/ rule if available

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mdadm/+bug/1017407/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1009973] Re: SRU upstream bugfix micro point release 3.2.5

2012-08-04 Thread Adam Conrad
Hello Dmitrijs, or anyone else affected,

Accepted mdadm into precise-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at http://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mdadm/3.2.5-1ubuntu0.2
in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.

Please help us by testing this new package.  See
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation how to
enable and use -proposed.  Your feedback will aid us getting this update
out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please change the bug tag from
verification-needed to verification-done.  If it does not, change the
tag to verification-failed.  In either case, details of your testing
will help us make a better decision.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification .  Thank you in
advance!

** Tags removed: verification-failed

** Tags added: verification-needed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1009973

Title:
  SRU upstream bugfix micro point release 3.2.5

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-release-notes/+bug/1009973/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1002357] Please test proposed package

2012-08-04 Thread Adam Conrad
Hello Dmitrijs, or anyone else affected,

Accepted mdadm into precise-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at http://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mdadm/3.2.5-1ubuntu0.2
in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.

Please help us by testing this new package.  See
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation how to
enable and use -proposed.  Your feedback will aid us getting this update
out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please change the bug tag from
verification-needed to verification-done.  If it does not, change the
tag to verification-failed.  In either case, details of your testing
will help us make a better decision.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification .  Thank you in
advance!

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1002357

Title:
  sort out udev rules madness (3 editions installed into 4 files)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mdadm/+bug/1002357/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 969384] Please test proposed package

2012-08-04 Thread Adam Conrad
Hello Paul, or anyone else affected,

Accepted mdadm into precise-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at http://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mdadm/3.2.5-1ubuntu0.2
in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.

Please help us by testing this new package.  See
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation how to
enable and use -proposed.  Your feedback will aid us getting this update
out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please change the bug tag from
verification-needed to verification-done.  If it does not, change the
tag to verification-failed.  In either case, details of your testing
will help us make a better decision.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification .  Thank you in
advance!

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/969384

Title:
  mdadm --detail --scan segfaults during update-initramfs

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mdadm/+bug/969384/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 968074] Please test proposed package

2012-08-04 Thread Adam Conrad
Hello Tuomas, or anyone else affected,

Accepted mdadm into precise-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at http://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mdadm/3.2.5-1ubuntu0.2
in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.

Please help us by testing this new package.  See
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation how to
enable and use -proposed.  Your feedback will aid us getting this update
out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please change the bug tag from
verification-needed to verification-done.  If it does not, change the
tag to verification-failed.  In either case, details of your testing
will help us make a better decision.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification .  Thank you in
advance!

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/968074

Title:
  Partitionable raid ignored by 65-mdadm-blkid.rules

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mdadm/+bug/968074/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 957494] Please test proposed package

2012-08-04 Thread Adam Conrad
Hello Clint, or anyone else affected,

Accepted mdadm into precise-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at http://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mdadm/3.2.5-1ubuntu0.2
in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.

Please help us by testing this new package.  See
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation how to
enable and use -proposed.  Your feedback will aid us getting this update
out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please change the bug tag from
verification-needed to verification-done.  If it does not, change the
tag to verification-failed.  In either case, details of your testing
will help us make a better decision.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification .  Thank you in
advance!

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/957494

Title:
  Missing added utility 'mdmon'

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mdadm/+bug/957494/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 942106] Re: software raid doesn't assemble before mount on boot

2012-08-04 Thread Adam Conrad
Hello Håvar, or anyone else affected,

Accepted mdadm into precise-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at http://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mdadm/3.2.5-1ubuntu0.2
in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.

Please help us by testing this new package.  See
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation how to
enable and use -proposed.  Your feedback will aid us getting this update
out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please change the bug tag from
verification-needed to verification-done.  If it does not, change the
tag to verification-failed.  In either case, details of your testing
will help us make a better decision.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification .  Thank you in
advance!

** Tags removed: verification-done

** Tags added: verification-needed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/942106

Title:
  software raid doesn't assemble before mount on boot

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mdadm/+bug/942106/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1025638] Re: frequent disconnects

2012-08-04 Thread Rolf Leggewie
To explicitly answer your new requests to the best of my ability:

+ Is this a regression?
+ Does this occur with other wireless access points?

I don't know.  I never into it before AFAIR.  But the situation is
obviously special and occurs only where a roaming setup of several AP
with the same ESSID is deployed.  Furthermore, it's safe to assume that
an airport such as HKG is wifi-busy.  The problem might not occur in
other, less congested environments.  I have never experienced the
problem since and connected fine to a few wifi networks (but in less
congested areas and without a roaming setup as far as I am aware of).

+ Does this problem occur in mainline?

untested at the moment, still pending as tagged

+ Does the access point in Hong Kong have some firmware bug or access
policy that does not permit Ubuntu/Linux clients?

I think we should assume no. I was able to surf for several minutes at a
time.

+ What is the manufacturer and model of the access point?

that's a silly question.  I don't know.  I'm not going to contact the
airport and ask them.  There *IS* a limit to what I will do to help bug
triage.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1025638

Title:
  frequent disconnects

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1025638/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1013996] Re: gnome-language-selector crashed when Apply System-Wide button was clicked.

2012-08-04 Thread dino99
** Changed in: language-selector (Ubuntu)
   Status: Incomplete = Confirmed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1013996

Title:
  gnome-language-selector crashed when Apply System-Wide button was
  clicked.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/language-selector/+bug/1013996/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 993257] Re: IDT 92HD81B1C5, Speaker, Internal] Playback volume very low

2012-08-04 Thread Lee
Lenovo ZHAOYANG E46  
/etc/modprobe.d/alsa-base.conf :
options snd-hda-intel model=auto

$sudo head -1 /proc/asound/card0/codec#0
Codec: IDT 92HD81B1C5

aplay -l
 List of PLAYBACK Hardware Devices 
card 0: Intel [HDA Intel], device 0: STAC92xx Analog [STAC92xx Analog]
  Subdevices: 1/1
  Subdevice #0: subdevice #0
card 1: NVidia [HDA NVidia], device 3: HDMI 0 [HDMI 0]
  Subdevices: 1/1
  Subdevice #0: subdevice #0
card 1: NVidia [HDA NVidia], device 7: HDMI 0 [HDMI 0]
  Subdevices: 1/1
  Subdevice #0: subdevice #0
card 1: NVidia [HDA NVidia], device 8: HDMI 0 [HDMI 0]
  Subdevices: 1/1
  Subdevice #0: subdevice #0
card 1: NVidia [HDA NVidia], device 9: HDMI 0 [HDMI 0]
  Subdevices: 1/1
  Subdevice #0: subdevice #0

 $ lspci -v
00:1b.0 Audio device: Intel Corporation 5 Series/3400 Series Chipset High 
Definition Audio (rev 05)
Subsystem: Lenovo Device 38af
Flags: bus master, fast devsel, latency 0, IRQ 46
Memory at f062 (64-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=16K]
Capabilities: access denied
Kernel driver in use: snd_hda_intel
Kernel modules: snd-hda-intel
01:00.1 Audio device: nVidia Corporation High Definition Audio Controller (rev 
a1)
Subsystem: Lenovo Device 391a
Flags: bus master, fast devsel, latency 0, IRQ 17
Memory at cdefc000 (32-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=16K]
Capabilities: access denied
Kernel driver in use: snd_hda_intel
Kernel modules: snd-hda-intel

 $ arecord -l
 List of CAPTURE Hardware Devices 
card 0: Intel [HDA Intel], device 0: STAC92xx Analog [STAC92xx Analog]
  Subdevices: 1/1
  Subdevice #0: subdevice #0

 $ more /proc/asound/cards
 0 [Intel  ]: HDA-Intel - HDA Intel
  HDA Intel at 0xf062 irq 48
 1 [NVidia ]: HDA-Intel - HDA NVidia
  HDA NVidia at 0xcdefc000 irq 17

$ more /proc/asound/modules 
 0 snd_hda_intel
 1 snd_hda_intel

AlsaMixer v1.0.24.2

FYI,
Sound volume is very low. After suspending, the sound volume returned to normal 
status. Then after i reboot, the sound turn to very low again. When running 
ubuntu in virtualbox vm machine and choosing  ac'97 as the sound option, the 
sound volume is normal and it has no sound at all after switching into intel 
HD-audio as the sound option.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/993257

Title:
  IDT 92HD81B1C5, Speaker, Internal] Playback volume very low

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/alsa-driver/+bug/993257/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1028865] Re: Text is pixelated when printing

2012-08-04 Thread Romeo Dragnea
Attached/ error log 360 dpi

** Attachment added: error_log #360X360dpi.txt
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gutenprint/+bug/1028865/+attachment/3247364/+files/error_log%20%23360X360dpi.txt

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1028865

Title:
  Text is pixelated when printing

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gutenprint/+bug/1028865/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1028865] Re: Text is pixelated when printing

2012-08-04 Thread Romeo Dragnea
Attached/ error log 720 dpi

Thank you :)

** Attachment added: error_log #360X720dpi.txt
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gutenprint/+bug/1028865/+attachment/3247365/+files/error_log%20%23360X720dpi.txt

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1028865

Title:
  Text is pixelated when printing

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gutenprint/+bug/1028865/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 984785] Re: .goutputstream files polluting $HOME

2012-08-04 Thread Kevin Youren
I found that the program evince which is used for PDF reading/viewing writes 
to the home drive
See /etc/apparmor.d/usr.bin.evince where it has:

  # evince creates a temporary stream file like '.goutputstream-XX' in the
  # directory a file is saved. This allows that behavior.
  owner /**/.goutputstream-* w,

Of course, several other programs could use the same technique to save
status info, neglects to clean them up.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/984785

Title:
  .goutputstream files polluting $HOME

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/glib/+bug/984785/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 968412] Re: Internal error in the solver

2012-08-04 Thread Daniel Hartwig
A patch has been submitted against Bug #831768 which, in my testing,
resolves this issue also.

Please test that patch if you are affected by this bug and report
whether or not it works.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/968412

Title:
  Internal error in the solver

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/aptitude/+bug/968412/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


Re: [Bug 1032756] [NEW] Dropbox wants root access

2012-08-04 Thread Raphaël Hertzog
On Sat, 04 Aug 2012, Mika Suomalainen wrote:
  Do you have something in /var/lib/dropbox/.dropbox-dist now ?
 
 File or folder does not exist.

So it's normal that it tries to download what's missing.

 Error: Trouble connecting to Dropbox servers. Maybe your internet
 connection was down, or you need to set your http_proxy environment
 variabe.
 The installation of Dropbox failed.

Except that your connection doesn't seem to work. Follow the advice
given here and you should be good. If it's not a proxy problem, it might
a firewall or something similar that is forbidding your connection
to the download URL at www.dropbox.com.

Cheers,
-- 
Raphaël Hertzog ◈ Debian Developer

Get the Debian Administrator's Handbook:
→ http://debian-handbook.info/get/

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1032756

Title:
  Dropbox wants root access

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nautilus-dropbox/+bug/1032756/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 831768] Re: aptitude cannot handle conflicts with multiarch enabled

2012-08-04 Thread Daniel Hartwig
** Changed in: aptitude (Debian)
   Importance: Undecided = Unknown

** Changed in: aptitude (Debian)
   Status: New = Unknown

** Changed in: aptitude (Debian)
 Remote watch: None = Debian Bug tracker #672340

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/831768

Title:
  aptitude cannot handle conflicts with multiarch enabled

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/aptitude/+bug/831768/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1032912] [NEW] package indicator-weather 11.11.28-0ubuntu1.1 failed to install/upgrade: podproces instalovaný post-installation skript vrátil chybový status 1

2012-08-04 Thread Jan Kaláb
Public bug reported:

Was updating, this happened

ProblemType: Package
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04
Package: indicator-weather 11.11.28-0ubuntu1.1
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-29.46-generic 3.2.24
Uname: Linux 3.2.0-29-generic x86_64
NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia
ApportVersion: 2.0.1-0ubuntu12
Architecture: amd64
Date: Sat Aug  4 09:10:12 2012
ErrorMessage: podproces instalovaný post-installation skript vrátil chybový 
status 1
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 12.04 LTS Precise Pangolin - Release amd64 
(20120425)
PackageArchitecture: all
SourcePackage: indicator-weather
Title: package indicator-weather 11.11.28-0ubuntu1.1 failed to install/upgrade: 
podproces instalovaný post-installation skript vrátil chybový status 1
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

** Affects: indicator-weather (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-package precise

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1032912

Title:
  package indicator-weather 11.11.28-0ubuntu1.1 failed to
  install/upgrade: podproces instalovaný post-installation skript vrátil
  chybový status 1

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/indicator-weather/+bug/1032912/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1032912] Re: package indicator-weather 11.11.28-0ubuntu1.1 failed to install/upgrade: podproces instalovaný post-installation skript vrátil chybový status 1

2012-08-04 Thread Jan Kaláb
-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1032912

Title:
  package indicator-weather 11.11.28-0ubuntu1.1 failed to
  install/upgrade: podproces instalovaný post-installation skript vrátil
  chybový status 1

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/indicator-weather/+bug/1032912/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1022593] Re: gconf_resource crashed with UnicodeDecodeError in get_gconf(): 'ascii' codec can't decode byte 0xc3 in position 2527: ordinal not in range(128)

2012-08-04 Thread dino99
Similar error into a terminal:

sudo add-apt-repository ppa:xorg-edgers/ppa

Traceback (most recent call last):
Fileusr/bin/add-apt-repository, line 139, in module
 print(_( ...
UnicodeEncodeError: 'ascii' codec can't encode character '\xe0' in position 34: 
ordinal not in range(128)

This is with Quantal i386  fr_FR-utf8

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1022593

Title:
  gconf_resource crashed with UnicodeDecodeError in get_gconf(): 'ascii'
  codec can't decode byte 0xc3 in position 2527: ordinal not in
  range(128)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/checkbox/+bug/1022593/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 954565] Re: Applications bleed or move into adjacent workspaces...

2012-08-04 Thread Elmar Roberg
This is the most frustrating thing! Enough to cause one to tear one's
hair out.

It has nothing to do with Gimp. For me, it happens with system monitor,
arora, chrome, almost anything, and every day. Worst is that the windows
sometimes get moved to workspaces that are not even visible. Nothing
then appears in the Unity bar. If I then open the doc in Nautilus again,
it reappears as if by magic.

Other times, something happens and whilst the panel is still visible it
becomes non-responsive. I then discovered if you press the hard shutdown
button it brings up the shutdown dialog and restore the workspaces
again.

The worst is that all this stuff worked perfectly in ubuntu 11.04. I did
not upgrade to 11.10 because I could simply not get it to work at all on
my Dell XPS.

The other frustrating thing is that it sometimes bleeds it in such a way
that just the top border is not visible - so you cannot drag the window.
Only option sometimes is to open up system monitor, kill the process and
restart it again

Do you know how frustrating this is if you are due for a meeting and
have some last minute printing to do, or something like that?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/954565

Title:
  Applications bleed or move into adjacent workspaces...

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/unity/+bug/954565/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1025638] Re: frequent disconnects

2012-08-04 Thread Rolf Leggewie
of course, it's very well possible this is a bug in other parts of the
software and not the kernel.  at the moment I reported the issue the
kernel seemed to be the most natural choice, especially since I had the
impression of lacklustre wifi driver performance a few times in the
past.

Google gets a bunch of hits for Roamed from BSSID to (none)
((none)).  Bug 291760 looks similar and was fixed in network-manager.
But apparently, similar issues still exist for people in very recent
releases of Ubuntu.

Just throwing some findings out there without much of a direction for
now.  Maybe somebody else can connect the dots or maybe I will have a
moment of clarity soon.

I have a few routers at my disposal.  Can I somehow easily recreate a
roaming setup?  It might still not be enough to trigger the bug, but
then again it might.  I shall try creating a WDS setup to see if it
reproduces the problem here.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1025638

Title:
  frequent disconnects

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1025638/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1032913] Re: evolution crashed with SIGABRT in raise()

2012-08-04 Thread Apport retracing service
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 963670 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/963670

Thank you for taking the time to report this crash and helping to make
this software better.  This particular crash has already been reported
and is a duplicate of bug #963670, so is being marked as such.  Please
look at the other bug report to see if there is any missing information
that you can provide, or to see if there is a workaround for the bug.
Additionally, any further discussion regarding the bug should occur in
the other report.  Please continue to report any other bugs you may
find.

** Attachment removed: CoreDump.gz
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1032913/+attachment/3247373/+files/CoreDump.gz

** Attachment removed: Disassembly.txt
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1032913/+attachment/3247375/+files/Disassembly.txt

** Attachment removed: ProcMaps.txt
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1032913/+attachment/3247377/+files/ProcMaps.txt

** Attachment removed: ProcStatus.txt
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1032913/+attachment/3247378/+files/ProcStatus.txt

** Attachment removed: Registers.txt
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1032913/+attachment/3247379/+files/Registers.txt

** Attachment removed: Stacktrace.txt
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1032913/+attachment/3247380/+files/Stacktrace.txt

** Attachment removed: ThreadStacktrace.txt
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1032913/+attachment/3247381/+files/ThreadStacktrace.txt

** This bug has been marked a duplicate of private bug 963670

** Visibility changed to: Public

** Tags removed: need-i386-retrace

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1032913

Title:
  evolution crashed with SIGABRT in raise()

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/evolution/+bug/1032913/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1032886] Re: Resumed as guest OS does not update time (Windows XP does!)

2012-08-04 Thread Full Name
It appears that after about a minute or so, the time is updated. When the last 
observation was made just before filing this bug, a day had passed between the 
guest OS suspension and resumption. So, I still need to confirm this for day 
change.
For now, a resumption on the same day seems to set current time correctly. May 
be, I was being impatient.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1032886

Title:
  Resumed as guest OS does not update time (Windows XP does!)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/indicator-datetime/+bug/1032886/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1032886] Re: Resumed as guest OS does not update time (Windows XP does!)

2012-08-04 Thread Full Name
Assigned package.

** Package changed: ubuntu = indicator-datetime (Ubuntu)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1032886

Title:
  Resumed as guest OS does not update time (Windows XP does!)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/indicator-datetime/+bug/1032886/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1029981] Re: FTBFS on i386 in quantal

2012-08-04 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
** Branch linked: lp:debian/sdlgfx

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1029981

Title:
  FTBFS on i386 in quantal

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/sdlgfx/+bug/1029981/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 981289] Re: Window list entries colored in white instead of dark (GNOME Classic / Ambiance theme)

2012-08-04 Thread Juan Antonio Peña
Hi Whoopie,

Is it an official update or just your personal fix? Could you add an
screenshot to see how this works?

Thank you!

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/981289

Title:
  Window list entries colored in white instead of dark (GNOME Classic /
  Ambiance theme)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/light-themes/+bug/981289/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 945987] Re: No Settings are available in Preferred format, only preset defaults are used

2012-08-04 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
** Branch linked: lp:ubuntu/precise-proposed/transmageddon

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/945987

Title:
  No Settings are available in Preferred  format, only preset defaults
  are used

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/gstreamer/+bug/945987/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 291760] Re: network-manager roams to (none) ((none)) - background scanning

2012-08-04 Thread Rolf Leggewie
Matthieu, I agree.  This ticket has become hard to deal with but
obviously wifi roaming still creates problems for many users, me
included.  I ran into bug 1025638 and during triage found this ticket.
Unfortunately, it looks like some of the kernel bug triagers are
interested in closing tickets rather than fixing problems :-(  Just a
heads-up in case someone with an ath9k and maybe even a 100P netbook
sees similar issues.  Feel free to pile on in bug 1025638.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/291760

Title:
  network-manager roams to (none) ((none)) - background scanning

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/linux/+bug/291760/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1032915] Re: [quantal] dbus: upgrade fails in chroot

2012-08-04 Thread Martin-Éric Racine
-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1032915

Title:
  [quantal] dbus: upgrade fails in chroot

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dbus/+bug/1032915/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1032915] [NEW] [quantal] dbus: upgrade fails in chroot

2012-08-04 Thread Martin-Éric Racine
Public bug reported:

Setting up dbus (1.6.4-1ubuntu1) ...
Installing new version of config file /etc/init/dbus.conf ...
Failed to open connection to system message bus: Failed to connect to socket 
/var/run/dbus/system_bus_socket: No such file or directory
initctl: Unable to connect to Upstart: Failed to connect to socket 
/com/ubuntu/upstart: Connection refused
start: Unable to connect to Upstart: Failed to connect to socket 
/com/ubuntu/upstart: Connection refused
invoke-rc.d: initscript dbus, action start failed.
dpkg: error processing dbus (--configure):
 subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.10
Package: dbus 1.6.4-1ubuntu1
Uname: Linux 3.2.0-3-686-pae i686
NonfreeKernelModules: cpufreq_stats cpufreq_conservative cpufreq_powersave 
cpufreq_userspace parport_pc ppdev lp parport bnep rfcomm bluetooth uinput 
ecryptfs dm_crypt dm_mod arc4 snd_hda_codec_idt iwl4965 snd_hda_intel 
iwl_legacy snd_hda_codec mac80211 snd_hwdep snd_pcm_oss snd_mixer_oss snd_pcm 
cfg80211 snd_page_alloc snd_seq_midi snd_seq_midi_event snd_rawmidi joydev 
pcmcia snd_seq snd_seq_device snd_timer iTCO_wdt snd yenta_socket pcmcia_rsrc 
pcmcia_core dell_wmi sparse_keymap iTCO_vendor_support soundcore acpi_cpufreq 
mperf psmouse i2c_i801 serio_raw evdev rng_core coretemp battery processor ac 
ext4 crc16 jbd2 mbcache btrfs crc32c libcrc32c zlib_deflate usbhid hid sd_mod 
crc_t10dif dell_laptop ata_generic i915 rfkill power_supply dcdbas ata_piix 
libata uhci_hcd scsi_mod i2c_algo_bit drm_kms_helper sdhci_pci drm ehci_hcd 
sdhci mmc_core firewire_ohci tg3 libphy video wmi firewire_core crc_itu_t 
button thermal usbcore i2c_core thermal_sys usb_common
ApportVersion: 2.4-0ubuntu6
Architecture: i386
Date: Sat Aug  4 10:47:51 2012
ProcEnviron:
 LANGUAGE=fi_FI:en
 TERM=xterm
 PATH=(custom, user)
 LANG=fi_FI.UTF-8
 SHELL=/bin/bash
SourcePackage: dbus
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

** Affects: dbus (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: apport-bug i386 quantal

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1032915

Title:
  [quantal] dbus: upgrade fails in chroot

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dbus/+bug/1032915/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1029583] Re: Dell Inspiron 1420 without battery: processor.ignore_ppc does nothing

2012-08-04 Thread David Nemeskey
** Tags removed: needs-upstream-testing
** Tags added: kernel-bug-exists-upstream

** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
   Status: Incomplete = Confirmed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1029583

Title:
  Dell Inspiron 1420 without battery: processor.ignore_ppc does nothing

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1029583/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1017822] Re: [quantal] fglrx fails to build on i386

2012-08-04 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
** Branch linked: lp:~ubuntu-branches/ubuntu/precise/fglrx-installer-
updates/precise-proposed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1017822

Title:
  [quantal] fglrx fails to build on i386

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fglrx-installer/+bug/1017822/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 993716] Re: add-apt-repository does not add key properly

2012-08-04 Thread ill
** Description changed:

  When executing the command add-apt-repository to add a repository with a
  key, it never adds the key, instead at the end it says unchanged and
  then updating the repository generates missing key errors.
  
+ $ sudo add-apt-repository ppa:kubuntu-ppa/backports
+ [sudo] password for ill:
+ You are about to add the following PPA to your system:
+  Backports of new versions of KDE and major KDE apps for Kubuntu which are 
either too large a change or not yet tested enough to go to Ubuntu Backports.
  
- $ sudo add-apt-repository ppa:kubuntu-ppa/backports
- [sudo] password for luke: 
- You are about to add the following PPA to your system:
-  Backports of new versions of KDE and major KDE apps for Kubuntu which are 
either too large a change or not yet tested enough to go to Ubuntu Backports.
- 
- 
-  More info: https://launchpad.net/~kubuntu-ppa/+archive/backports
+  More info: https://launchpad.net/~kubuntu-ppa/+archive/backports
  Press [ENTER] to continue or ctrl-c to cancel adding it
  
  Executing: gpg --ignore-time-conflict --no-options --no-default-keyring 
--secret-keyring /tmp/tmp.NbcwRTZm6G --trustdb-name /etc/apt/trustdb.gpg 
--keyring /etc/apt/trusted.gpg --primary-keyring /etc/apt/trusted.gpg 
--keyserver hkp://keyserver.ubuntu.com:80/ --recv 
E4DFEC907DEDA4B8A670E8042836CB0A8AC93F7A
  gpg: requesting key 8AC93F7A from hkp server keyserver.ubuntu.com
  gpg: key 8AC93F7A: Launchpad Kubuntu Updates not changed
  gpg: Total number processed: 1
  gpg:  unchanged: 1

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/993716

Title:
  add-apt-repository does not add key properly

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/software-properties/+bug/993716/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 964365] Re: Weather indicator as earthtools.org is down

2012-08-04 Thread Viktor Pal
What I did so far with the one installed from the repositories is I changed  
get_sun_data to return some fixed values.
This was a homemade fix as I needed the weather information and did not find 
this bug at the time.
You could do this possibly when earthtools.org is not available to avoid the 
icon stuck to yellow sun?
Though clearly the best solution wold be to use pyephem as stated above as it 
does not seem to me that the mentioned website will be available in the future.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/964365

Title:
  Weather indicator as earthtools.org is down

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/weather-indicator/+bug/964365/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   >