[Bug 1180438] Re: 'ceilometer *-list' too slow to respond

2013-05-16 Thread Yolanda Robla
This is doesn't seem to be a valid Ubuntu bug. Marking it as invalid.

** Changed in: ceilometer (Ubuntu)
   Status: New = Invalid

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to ceilometer in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1180438

Title:
  'ceilometer *-list'  too slow to respond

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ceilometer/+bug/1180438/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Blueprint servercloud-s-cloud-archive] Ubuntu Cloud Archive Status Check

2013-05-16 Thread Dave Walker
Blueprint changed by Dave Walker:

Work items changed:
  Work items:
  Open Cloud Archive for Havana development: TODO
  Document proposed OpenStack SRU cadence process: TODO
  Update Cloud Archive documentation inline with support lifecycle: TODO
+ Expose build logs for UCA packages: TODO

-- 
Ubuntu Cloud Archive Status Check
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/servercloud-s-cloud-archive

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1180094] Re: Update to 4.0

2013-05-16 Thread Robie Basak
This would be a pretty big leap, since samba is used on the desktop for
various integration functions as well. We'd need to be very careful to
not break anything.

Why do you think the default should be changed in Ubuntu?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1180094

Title:
  Update to 4.0

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/1180094/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1089488] Verification report.

2013-05-16 Thread Yolanda Robla
Please find the attached test log from the Ubuntu Server Team's CI
infrastructure.  As part of the verification process for this bug, Nova
has been deployed and configured across multiple nodes using precise-
proposed as an installation source.  After successful bring-up and
configuration of the cluster, a number of exercises and smoke tests have
be invoked to ensure the updated package did not introduce any
regressions. A number of test iterations were carried out to catch any
possible transient errors.

Please Note the list of installed packages at the top and bottom of the
report.

As per the provisional Micro Release Exception granted to this package
by the Technical Board, we hope this contributes toward verification of
this update.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nova in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1089488

Title:
  Meta bug for tracking Openstack Stable Updates

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/glance/+bug/1089488/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1089488] Re: Meta bug for tracking Openstack Stable Updates

2013-05-16 Thread Yolanda Robla
Test coverage log.

** Attachment added: 2012.1.3+stable-20130405-e52e6912-0ubuntu1.log
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1089488/+attachment/3678007/+files/2012.1.3%2Bstable-20130405-e52e6912-0ubuntu1.log

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nova in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1089488

Title:
  Meta bug for tracking Openstack Stable Updates

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/glance/+bug/1089488/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1089488] Verification report.

2013-05-16 Thread Yolanda Robla
Please find the attached test log from the Ubuntu Server Team's CI
infrastructure.  As part of the verification process for this bug, Nova
has been deployed and configured across multiple nodes using precise-
proposed as an installation source.  After successful bring-up and
configuration of the cluster, a number of exercises and smoke tests have
be invoked to ensure the updated package did not introduce any
regressions. A number of test iterations were carried out to catch any
possible transient errors.

Please Note the list of installed packages at the top and bottom of the
report.

As per the provisional Micro Release Exception granted to this package
by the Technical Board, we hope this contributes toward verification of
this update.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nova in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1089488

Title:
  Meta bug for tracking Openstack Stable Updates

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/glance/+bug/1089488/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Blueprint servercloud-s-cloud-archive] Ubuntu Cloud Archive Status Check

2013-05-16 Thread Dave Walker
Blueprint changed by Dave Walker:

Work items changed:
  Work items:
  Open Cloud Archive for Havana development: TODO
  Document proposed OpenStack SRU cadence process: TODO
  Update Cloud Archive documentation inline with support lifecycle: TODO
  Expose build logs for UCA packages: TODO
+ Better expose per package build state for UCA packages: TODO

-- 
Ubuntu Cloud Archive Status Check
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/servercloud-s-cloud-archive

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1079745] Verification report.

2013-05-16 Thread Yolanda Robla
Please find the attached test log from the Ubuntu Server Team's CI
infrastructure.  As part of the verification process for this bug, Nova
has been deployed and configured across multiple nodes using precise-
proposed as an installation source.  After successful bring-up and
configuration of the cluster, a number of exercises and smoke tests have
be invoked to ensure the updated package did not introduce any
regressions. A number of test iterations were carried out to catch any
possible transient errors.

Please Note the list of installed packages at the top and bottom of the
report.

For records of upstream test coverage of this update, please see the
Jenkins links in the comments of the relevant  upstream code-review(s):

Stable review: https://review.openstack.org/16356

As per the provisional Micro Release Exception granted to this package
by the Technical Board, we hope this contributes toward verification of
this update.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nova in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1079745

Title:
  Essex 2012.1.3 : Error deleting instance with 2 Nova Volumes attached

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1079745/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1089488] Re: Meta bug for tracking Openstack Stable Updates

2013-05-16 Thread Yolanda Robla
Test coverage log.

** Attachment added: 2012.1.3+stable-20130405-e52e6912-0ubuntu1.log
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1089488/+attachment/3678023/+files/2012.1.3%2Bstable-20130405-e52e6912-0ubuntu1.log

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nova in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1089488

Title:
  Meta bug for tracking Openstack Stable Updates

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/glance/+bug/1089488/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1079745] Re: Essex 2012.1.3 : Error deleting instance with 2 Nova Volumes attached

2013-05-16 Thread Yolanda Robla
Test coverage log.

** Attachment added: 2012.1.3+stable-20130405-e52e6912-0ubuntu1.log
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1079745/+attachment/3678010/+files/2012.1.3%2Bstable-20130405-e52e6912-0ubuntu1.log

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nova in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1079745

Title:
  Essex 2012.1.3 : Error deleting instance with 2 Nova Volumes attached

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1079745/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1079745] Verification report.

2013-05-16 Thread Yolanda Robla
Please find the attached test log from the Ubuntu Server Team's CI
infrastructure.  As part of the verification process for this bug, Nova
has been deployed and configured across multiple nodes using precise-
proposed as an installation source.  After successful bring-up and
configuration of the cluster, a number of exercises and smoke tests have
be invoked to ensure the updated package did not introduce any
regressions. A number of test iterations were carried out to catch any
possible transient errors.

Please Note the list of installed packages at the top and bottom of the
report.

For records of upstream test coverage of this update, please see the
Jenkins links in the comments of the relevant  upstream code-review(s):

Stable review: https://review.openstack.org/16356

As per the provisional Micro Release Exception granted to this package
by the Technical Board, we hope this contributes toward verification of
this update.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nova in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1079745

Title:
  Essex 2012.1.3 : Error deleting instance with 2 Nova Volumes attached

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1079745/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1079745] Re: Essex 2012.1.3 : Error deleting instance with 2 Nova Volumes attached

2013-05-16 Thread Yolanda Robla
Test coverage log.

** Attachment added: 2012.1.3+stable-20130405-e52e6912-0ubuntu1.log
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1079745/+attachment/3678026/+files/2012.1.3%2Bstable-20130405-e52e6912-0ubuntu1.log

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nova in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1079745

Title:
  Essex 2012.1.3 : Error deleting instance with 2 Nova Volumes attached

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1079745/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1075859] Verification report.

2013-05-16 Thread Yolanda Robla
Please find the attached test log from the Ubuntu Server Team's CI
infrastructure.  As part of the verification process for this bug, Nova
has been deployed and configured across multiple nodes using precise-
proposed as an installation source.  After successful bring-up and
configuration of the cluster, a number of exercises and smoke tests have
be invoked to ensure the updated package did not introduce any
regressions. A number of test iterations were carried out to catch any
possible transient errors.

Please Note the list of installed packages at the top and bottom of the
report.

For records of upstream test coverage of this update, please see the
Jenkins links in the comments of the relevant  upstream code-review(s):

Trunk review: https://review.openstack.org/16227
Stable review: https://review.openstack.org/16722

As per the provisional Micro Release Exception granted to this package
by the Technical Board, we hope this contributes toward verification of
this update.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nova in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1075859

Title:
  use_single_default_gateway does not function correctly

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1075859/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1075859] Re: use_single_default_gateway does not function correctly

2013-05-16 Thread Yolanda Robla
Test coverage log.

** Attachment added: 2012.1.3+stable-20130405-e52e6912-0ubuntu1.log
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1075859/+attachment/3678009/+files/2012.1.3%2Bstable-20130405-e52e6912-0ubuntu1.log

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nova in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1075859

Title:
  use_single_default_gateway does not function correctly

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1075859/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1075859] Verification report.

2013-05-16 Thread Yolanda Robla
Please find the attached test log from the Ubuntu Server Team's CI
infrastructure.  As part of the verification process for this bug, Nova
has been deployed and configured across multiple nodes using precise-
proposed as an installation source.  After successful bring-up and
configuration of the cluster, a number of exercises and smoke tests have
be invoked to ensure the updated package did not introduce any
regressions. A number of test iterations were carried out to catch any
possible transient errors.

Please Note the list of installed packages at the top and bottom of the
report.

For records of upstream test coverage of this update, please see the
Jenkins links in the comments of the relevant  upstream code-review(s):

Trunk review: https://review.openstack.org/16227
Stable review: https://review.openstack.org/16722

As per the provisional Micro Release Exception granted to this package
by the Technical Board, we hope this contributes toward verification of
this update.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nova in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1075859

Title:
  use_single_default_gateway does not function correctly

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1075859/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1075859] Re: use_single_default_gateway does not function correctly

2013-05-16 Thread Yolanda Robla
Test coverage log.

** Attachment added: 2012.1.3+stable-20130405-e52e6912-0ubuntu1.log
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1075859/+attachment/3678025/+files/2012.1.3%2Bstable-20130405-e52e6912-0ubuntu1.log

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nova in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1075859

Title:
  use_single_default_gateway does not function correctly

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1075859/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1073569] Verification report.

2013-05-16 Thread Yolanda Robla
Please find the attached test log from the Ubuntu Server Team's CI
infrastructure.  As part of the verification process for this bug, Nova
has been deployed and configured across multiple nodes using precise-
proposed as an installation source.  After successful bring-up and
configuration of the cluster, a number of exercises and smoke tests have
be invoked to ensure the updated package did not introduce any
regressions. A number of test iterations were carried out to catch any
possible transient errors.

Please Note the list of installed packages at the top and bottom of the
report.

For records of upstream test coverage of this update, please see the
Jenkins links in the comments of the relevant  upstream code-review(s):

Trunk review: https://review.openstack.org/15098
Stable review: https://review.openstack.org/22943

As per the provisional Micro Release Exception granted to this package
by the Technical Board, we hope this contributes toward verification of
this update.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nova in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1073569

Title:
  Jenkins jobs fail because of incompatibility between sqlalchemy-
  migrate and the newest sqlalchemy-0.8.0b1

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/cinder/+bug/1073569/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1073569] Re: Jenkins jobs fail because of incompatibility between sqlalchemy-migrate and the newest sqlalchemy-0.8.0b1

2013-05-16 Thread Yolanda Robla
Test coverage log.

** Attachment added: 2012.1.3+stable-20130405-e52e6912-0ubuntu1.log
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1073569/+attachment/3678008/+files/2012.1.3%2Bstable-20130405-e52e6912-0ubuntu1.log

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nova in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1073569

Title:
  Jenkins jobs fail because of incompatibility between sqlalchemy-
  migrate and the newest sqlalchemy-0.8.0b1

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/cinder/+bug/1073569/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1073569] Verification report.

2013-05-16 Thread Yolanda Robla
Please find the attached test log from the Ubuntu Server Team's CI
infrastructure.  As part of the verification process for this bug, Nova
has been deployed and configured across multiple nodes using precise-
proposed as an installation source.  After successful bring-up and
configuration of the cluster, a number of exercises and smoke tests have
be invoked to ensure the updated package did not introduce any
regressions. A number of test iterations were carried out to catch any
possible transient errors.

Please Note the list of installed packages at the top and bottom of the
report.

For records of upstream test coverage of this update, please see the
Jenkins links in the comments of the relevant  upstream code-review(s):

Trunk review: https://review.openstack.org/15098
Stable review: https://review.openstack.org/22943

As per the provisional Micro Release Exception granted to this package
by the Technical Board, we hope this contributes toward verification of
this update.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nova in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1073569

Title:
  Jenkins jobs fail because of incompatibility between sqlalchemy-
  migrate and the newest sqlalchemy-0.8.0b1

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/cinder/+bug/1073569/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1073569] Re: Jenkins jobs fail because of incompatibility between sqlalchemy-migrate and the newest sqlalchemy-0.8.0b1

2013-05-16 Thread Yolanda Robla
Test coverage log.

** Attachment added: 2012.1.3+stable-20130405-e52e6912-0ubuntu1.log
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1073569/+attachment/3678024/+files/2012.1.3%2Bstable-20130405-e52e6912-0ubuntu1.log

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nova in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1073569

Title:
  Jenkins jobs fail because of incompatibility between sqlalchemy-
  migrate and the newest sqlalchemy-0.8.0b1

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/cinder/+bug/1073569/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1062314] Verification report.

2013-05-16 Thread Yolanda Robla
Please find the attached test log from the Ubuntu Server Team's CI
infrastructure.  As part of the verification process for this bug, Nova
has been deployed and configured across multiple nodes using precise-
proposed as an installation source.  After successful bring-up and
configuration of the cluster, a number of exercises and smoke tests have
be invoked to ensure the updated package did not introduce any
regressions. A number of test iterations were carried out to catch any
possible transient errors.

Please Note the list of installed packages at the top and bottom of the
report.

For records of upstream test coverage of this update, please see the
Jenkins links in the comments of the relevant  upstream code-review(s):

Trunk review: https://review.openstack.org/14326
Stable review: https://review.openstack.org/14368

As per the provisional Micro Release Exception granted to this package
by the Technical Board, we hope this contributes toward verification of
this update.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nova in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1062314

Title:
  do_refresh_security_group_rules in nova.virt.firewall is very slow

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1062314/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1062314] Re: do_refresh_security_group_rules in nova.virt.firewall is very slow

2013-05-16 Thread Yolanda Robla
Test coverage log.

** Attachment added: 2012.1.3+stable-20130405-e52e6912-0ubuntu1.log
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1062314/+attachment/3678011/+files/2012.1.3%2Bstable-20130405-e52e6912-0ubuntu1.log

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nova in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1062314

Title:
  do_refresh_security_group_rules in nova.virt.firewall is very slow

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1062314/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1062314] Verification report.

2013-05-16 Thread Yolanda Robla
Please find the attached test log from the Ubuntu Server Team's CI
infrastructure.  As part of the verification process for this bug, Nova
has been deployed and configured across multiple nodes using precise-
proposed as an installation source.  After successful bring-up and
configuration of the cluster, a number of exercises and smoke tests have
be invoked to ensure the updated package did not introduce any
regressions. A number of test iterations were carried out to catch any
possible transient errors.

Please Note the list of installed packages at the top and bottom of the
report.

For records of upstream test coverage of this update, please see the
Jenkins links in the comments of the relevant  upstream code-review(s):

Trunk review: https://review.openstack.org/14326
Stable review: https://review.openstack.org/14368

As per the provisional Micro Release Exception granted to this package
by the Technical Board, we hope this contributes toward verification of
this update.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nova in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1062314

Title:
  do_refresh_security_group_rules in nova.virt.firewall is very slow

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1062314/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1062314] Re: do_refresh_security_group_rules in nova.virt.firewall is very slow

2013-05-16 Thread Yolanda Robla
Test coverage log.

** Attachment added: 2012.1.3+stable-20130405-e52e6912-0ubuntu1.log
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1062314/+attachment/3678027/+files/2012.1.3%2Bstable-20130405-e52e6912-0ubuntu1.log

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nova in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1062314

Title:
  do_refresh_security_group_rules in nova.virt.firewall is very slow

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1062314/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1051924] Verification report.

2013-05-16 Thread Yolanda Robla
Please find the attached test log from the Ubuntu Server Team's CI
infrastructure.  As part of the verification process for this bug, Nova
has been deployed and configured across multiple nodes using precise-
proposed as an installation source.  After successful bring-up and
configuration of the cluster, a number of exercises and smoke tests have
be invoked to ensure the updated package did not introduce any
regressions. A number of test iterations were carried out to catch any
possible transient errors.

Please Note the list of installed packages at the top and bottom of the
report.

As per the provisional Micro Release Exception granted to this package
by the Technical Board, we hope this contributes toward verification of
this update.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nova in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1051924

Title:
  lock files may be removed in error dues to permissions issues

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/essex/+bug/1051924/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1051924] Verification report.

2013-05-16 Thread Yolanda Robla
Please find the attached test log from the Ubuntu Server Team's CI
infrastructure.  As part of the verification process for this bug, Nova
has been deployed and configured across multiple nodes using precise-
proposed as an installation source.  After successful bring-up and
configuration of the cluster, a number of exercises and smoke tests have
be invoked to ensure the updated package did not introduce any
regressions. A number of test iterations were carried out to catch any
possible transient errors.

Please Note the list of installed packages at the top and bottom of the
report.

As per the provisional Micro Release Exception granted to this package
by the Technical Board, we hope this contributes toward verification of
this update.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nova in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1051924

Title:
  lock files may be removed in error dues to permissions issues

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/essex/+bug/1051924/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1051924] Re: lock files may be removed in error dues to permissions issues

2013-05-16 Thread Yolanda Robla
Test coverage log.

** Attachment added: 2012.1.3+stable-20130405-e52e6912-0ubuntu1.log
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1051924/+attachment/3678031/+files/2012.1.3%2Bstable-20130405-e52e6912-0ubuntu1.log

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nova in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1051924

Title:
  lock files may be removed in error dues to permissions issues

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/essex/+bug/1051924/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1051924] Re: lock files may be removed in error dues to permissions issues

2013-05-16 Thread Yolanda Robla
Test coverage log.

** Attachment added: 2012.1.3+stable-20130405-e52e6912-0ubuntu1.log
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1051924/+attachment/3678015/+files/2012.1.3%2Bstable-20130405-e52e6912-0ubuntu1.log

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nova in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1051924

Title:
  lock files may be removed in error dues to permissions issues

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/essex/+bug/1051924/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1050982] Re: ensure_default_security_group() does not call sgh

2013-05-16 Thread Yolanda Robla
Test coverage log.

** Attachment added: 2012.1.3+stable-20130405-e52e6912-0ubuntu1.log
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1050982/+attachment/3678016/+files/2012.1.3%2Bstable-20130405-e52e6912-0ubuntu1.log

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nova in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1050982

Title:
  ensure_default_security_group() does not call sgh

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1050982/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1050982] Verification report.

2013-05-16 Thread Yolanda Robla
Please find the attached test log from the Ubuntu Server Team's CI
infrastructure.  As part of the verification process for this bug, Nova
has been deployed and configured across multiple nodes using precise-
proposed as an installation source.  After successful bring-up and
configuration of the cluster, a number of exercises and smoke tests have
be invoked to ensure the updated package did not introduce any
regressions. A number of test iterations were carried out to catch any
possible transient errors.

Please Note the list of installed packages at the top and bottom of the
report.

For records of upstream test coverage of this update, please see the
Jenkins links in the comments of the relevant  upstream code-review(s):

Trunk review: https://review.openstack.org/16133
Stable review: https://review.openstack.org/13034

As per the provisional Micro Release Exception granted to this package
by the Technical Board, we hope this contributes toward verification of
this update.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nova in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1050982

Title:
  ensure_default_security_group() does not call sgh

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1050982/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1050982] Verification report.

2013-05-16 Thread Yolanda Robla
Please find the attached test log from the Ubuntu Server Team's CI
infrastructure.  As part of the verification process for this bug, Nova
has been deployed and configured across multiple nodes using precise-
proposed as an installation source.  After successful bring-up and
configuration of the cluster, a number of exercises and smoke tests have
be invoked to ensure the updated package did not introduce any
regressions. A number of test iterations were carried out to catch any
possible transient errors.

Please Note the list of installed packages at the top and bottom of the
report.

For records of upstream test coverage of this update, please see the
Jenkins links in the comments of the relevant  upstream code-review(s):

Trunk review: https://review.openstack.org/16133
Stable review: https://review.openstack.org/13034

As per the provisional Micro Release Exception granted to this package
by the Technical Board, we hope this contributes toward verification of
this update.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nova in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1050982

Title:
  ensure_default_security_group() does not call sgh

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1050982/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1046313] Verification report.

2013-05-16 Thread Yolanda Robla
Please find the attached test log from the Ubuntu Server Team's CI
infrastructure.  As part of the verification process for this bug, Nova
has been deployed and configured across multiple nodes using precise-
proposed as an installation source.  After successful bring-up and
configuration of the cluster, a number of exercises and smoke tests have
be invoked to ensure the updated package did not introduce any
regressions. A number of test iterations were carried out to catch any
possible transient errors.

Please Note the list of installed packages at the top and bottom of the
report.

For records of upstream test coverage of this update, please see the
Jenkins links in the comments of the relevant  upstream code-review(s):

Trunk review: https://review.openstack.org/12623
Stable review: https://review.openstack.org/12624

As per the provisional Micro Release Exception granted to this package
by the Technical Board, we hope this contributes toward verification of
this update.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nova in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1046313

Title:
  At termination, LXC rootfs is not always unmounted before rmtree() is
  called

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1046313/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1046313] Re: At termination, LXC rootfs is not always unmounted before rmtree() is called

2013-05-16 Thread Yolanda Robla
Test coverage log.

** Attachment added: 2012.1.3+stable-20130405-e52e6912-0ubuntu1.log
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1046313/+attachment/3678017/+files/2012.1.3%2Bstable-20130405-e52e6912-0ubuntu1.log

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nova in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1046313

Title:
  At termination, LXC rootfs is not always unmounted before rmtree() is
  called

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1046313/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1050982] Re: ensure_default_security_group() does not call sgh

2013-05-16 Thread Yolanda Robla
Test coverage log.

** Attachment added: 2012.1.3+stable-20130405-e52e6912-0ubuntu1.log
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1050982/+attachment/3678032/+files/2012.1.3%2Bstable-20130405-e52e6912-0ubuntu1.log

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nova in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1050982

Title:
  ensure_default_security_group() does not call sgh

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1050982/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1046313] Verification report.

2013-05-16 Thread Yolanda Robla
Please find the attached test log from the Ubuntu Server Team's CI
infrastructure.  As part of the verification process for this bug, Nova
has been deployed and configured across multiple nodes using precise-
proposed as an installation source.  After successful bring-up and
configuration of the cluster, a number of exercises and smoke tests have
be invoked to ensure the updated package did not introduce any
regressions. A number of test iterations were carried out to catch any
possible transient errors.

Please Note the list of installed packages at the top and bottom of the
report.

For records of upstream test coverage of this update, please see the
Jenkins links in the comments of the relevant  upstream code-review(s):

Trunk review: https://review.openstack.org/12623
Stable review: https://review.openstack.org/12624

As per the provisional Micro Release Exception granted to this package
by the Technical Board, we hope this contributes toward verification of
this update.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nova in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1046313

Title:
  At termination, LXC rootfs is not always unmounted before rmtree() is
  called

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1046313/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1045152] Verification report.

2013-05-16 Thread Yolanda Robla
Please find the attached test log from the Ubuntu Server Team's CI
infrastructure.  As part of the verification process for this bug, Nova
has been deployed and configured across multiple nodes using precise-
proposed as an installation source.  After successful bring-up and
configuration of the cluster, a number of exercises and smoke tests have
be invoked to ensure the updated package did not introduce any
regressions. A number of test iterations were carried out to catch any
possible transient errors.

Please Note the list of installed packages at the top and bottom of the
report.

For records of upstream test coverage of this update, please see the
Jenkins links in the comments of the relevant  upstream code-review(s):

Trunk review: https://review.openstack.org/12335
Stable review: https://review.openstack.org/12985

As per the provisional Micro Release Exception granted to this package
by the Technical Board, we hope this contributes toward verification of
this update.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nova in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1045152

Title:
  Heavily loaded nova-compute instances don't sent reports frequently
  enough

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1045152/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1046313] Re: At termination, LXC rootfs is not always unmounted before rmtree() is called

2013-05-16 Thread Yolanda Robla
Test coverage log.

** Attachment added: 2012.1.3+stable-20130405-e52e6912-0ubuntu1.log
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1046313/+attachment/3678033/+files/2012.1.3%2Bstable-20130405-e52e6912-0ubuntu1.log

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nova in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1046313

Title:
  At termination, LXC rootfs is not always unmounted before rmtree() is
  called

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1046313/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1045152] Verification report.

2013-05-16 Thread Yolanda Robla
Please find the attached test log from the Ubuntu Server Team's CI
infrastructure.  As part of the verification process for this bug, Nova
has been deployed and configured across multiple nodes using precise-
proposed as an installation source.  After successful bring-up and
configuration of the cluster, a number of exercises and smoke tests have
be invoked to ensure the updated package did not introduce any
regressions. A number of test iterations were carried out to catch any
possible transient errors.

Please Note the list of installed packages at the top and bottom of the
report.

For records of upstream test coverage of this update, please see the
Jenkins links in the comments of the relevant  upstream code-review(s):

Trunk review: https://review.openstack.org/12335
Stable review: https://review.openstack.org/12985

As per the provisional Micro Release Exception granted to this package
by the Technical Board, we hope this contributes toward verification of
this update.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nova in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1045152

Title:
  Heavily loaded nova-compute instances don't sent reports frequently
  enough

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1045152/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1045152] Re: Heavily loaded nova-compute instances don't sent reports frequently enough

2013-05-16 Thread Yolanda Robla
Test coverage log.

** Attachment added: 2012.1.3+stable-20130405-e52e6912-0ubuntu1.log
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1045152/+attachment/3678018/+files/2012.1.3%2Bstable-20130405-e52e6912-0ubuntu1.log

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nova in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1045152

Title:
  Heavily loaded nova-compute instances don't sent reports frequently
  enough

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1045152/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1045152] Re: Heavily loaded nova-compute instances don't sent reports frequently enough

2013-05-16 Thread Yolanda Robla
Test coverage log.

** Attachment added: 2012.1.3+stable-20130405-e52e6912-0ubuntu1.log
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1045152/+attachment/3678034/+files/2012.1.3%2Bstable-20130405-e52e6912-0ubuntu1.log

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nova in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1045152

Title:
  Heavily loaded nova-compute instances don't sent reports frequently
  enough

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1045152/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1043999] Verification report.

2013-05-16 Thread Yolanda Robla
Please find the attached test log from the Ubuntu Server Team's CI
infrastructure.  As part of the verification process for this bug, Nova
has been deployed and configured across multiple nodes using precise-
proposed as an installation source.  After successful bring-up and
configuration of the cluster, a number of exercises and smoke tests have
be invoked to ensure the updated package did not introduce any
regressions. A number of test iterations were carried out to catch any
possible transient errors.

Please Note the list of installed packages at the top and bottom of the
report.

For records of upstream test coverage of this update, please see the
Jenkins links in the comments of the relevant  upstream code-review(s):

Trunk review: https://review.openstack.org/12304
Stable review: https://review.openstack.org/12479

As per the provisional Micro Release Exception granted to this package
by the Technical Board, we hope this contributes toward verification of
this update.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nova in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1043999

Title:
  nova usage-list returns  wrong usage

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1043999/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1043999] Re: nova usage-list returns wrong usage

2013-05-16 Thread Yolanda Robla
Test coverage log.

** Attachment added: 2012.1.3+stable-20130405-e52e6912-0ubuntu1.log
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1043999/+attachment/3678020/+files/2012.1.3%2Bstable-20130405-e52e6912-0ubuntu1.log

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nova in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1043999

Title:
  nova usage-list returns  wrong usage

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1043999/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1043999] Verification report.

2013-05-16 Thread Yolanda Robla
Please find the attached test log from the Ubuntu Server Team's CI
infrastructure.  As part of the verification process for this bug, Nova
has been deployed and configured across multiple nodes using precise-
proposed as an installation source.  After successful bring-up and
configuration of the cluster, a number of exercises and smoke tests have
be invoked to ensure the updated package did not introduce any
regressions. A number of test iterations were carried out to catch any
possible transient errors.

Please Note the list of installed packages at the top and bottom of the
report.

For records of upstream test coverage of this update, please see the
Jenkins links in the comments of the relevant  upstream code-review(s):

Trunk review: https://review.openstack.org/12304
Stable review: https://review.openstack.org/12479

As per the provisional Micro Release Exception granted to this package
by the Technical Board, we hope this contributes toward verification of
this update.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nova in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1043999

Title:
  nova usage-list returns  wrong usage

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1043999/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1043999] Re: nova usage-list returns wrong usage

2013-05-16 Thread Yolanda Robla
Test coverage log.

** Attachment added: 2012.1.3+stable-20130405-e52e6912-0ubuntu1.log
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1043999/+attachment/3678036/+files/2012.1.3%2Bstable-20130405-e52e6912-0ubuntu1.log

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nova in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1043999

Title:
  nova usage-list returns  wrong usage

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1043999/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1040537] Verification report.

2013-05-16 Thread Yolanda Robla
Please find the attached test log from the Ubuntu Server Team's CI
infrastructure.  As part of the verification process for this bug, Nova
has been deployed and configured across multiple nodes using precise-
proposed as an installation source.  After successful bring-up and
configuration of the cluster, a number of exercises and smoke tests have
be invoked to ensure the updated package did not introduce any
regressions. A number of test iterations were carried out to catch any
possible transient errors.

Please Note the list of installed packages at the top and bottom of the
report.

For records of upstream test coverage of this update, please see the
Jenkins links in the comments of the relevant  upstream code-review(s):

Trunk review: https://review.openstack.org/11925
Stable review: https://review.openstack.org/12123

As per the provisional Micro Release Exception granted to this package
by the Technical Board, we hope this contributes toward verification of
this update.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nova in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1040537

Title:
  Bridge port's hairpin mode not set after resuming a machine

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1040537/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1040537] Re: Bridge port's hairpin mode not set after resuming a machine

2013-05-16 Thread Yolanda Robla
Test coverage log.

** Attachment added: 2012.1.3+stable-20130405-e52e6912-0ubuntu1.log
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1040537/+attachment/3678021/+files/2012.1.3%2Bstable-20130405-e52e6912-0ubuntu1.log

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nova in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1040537

Title:
  Bridge port's hairpin mode not set after resuming a machine

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1040537/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1040537] Verification report.

2013-05-16 Thread Yolanda Robla
Please find the attached test log from the Ubuntu Server Team's CI
infrastructure.  As part of the verification process for this bug, Nova
has been deployed and configured across multiple nodes using precise-
proposed as an installation source.  After successful bring-up and
configuration of the cluster, a number of exercises and smoke tests have
be invoked to ensure the updated package did not introduce any
regressions. A number of test iterations were carried out to catch any
possible transient errors.

Please Note the list of installed packages at the top and bottom of the
report.

For records of upstream test coverage of this update, please see the
Jenkins links in the comments of the relevant  upstream code-review(s):

Trunk review: https://review.openstack.org/11925
Stable review: https://review.openstack.org/12123

As per the provisional Micro Release Exception granted to this package
by the Technical Board, we hope this contributes toward verification of
this update.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nova in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1040537

Title:
  Bridge port's hairpin mode not set after resuming a machine

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1040537/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1040537] Re: Bridge port's hairpin mode not set after resuming a machine

2013-05-16 Thread Yolanda Robla
Test coverage log.

** Attachment added: 2012.1.3+stable-20130405-e52e6912-0ubuntu1.log
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1040537/+attachment/3678038/+files/2012.1.3%2Bstable-20130405-e52e6912-0ubuntu1.log

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nova in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1040537

Title:
  Bridge port's hairpin mode not set after resuming a machine

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1040537/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1026210] Verification report.

2013-05-16 Thread Yolanda Robla
Please find the attached test log from the Ubuntu Server Team's CI
infrastructure.  As part of the verification process for this bug, Nova
has been deployed and configured across multiple nodes using precise-
proposed as an installation source.  After successful bring-up and
configuration of the cluster, a number of exercises and smoke tests have
be invoked to ensure the updated package did not introduce any
regressions. A number of test iterations were carried out to catch any
possible transient errors.

Please Note the list of installed packages at the top and bottom of the
report.

For records of upstream test coverage of this update, please see the
Jenkins links in the comments of the relevant  upstream code-review(s):

Trunk review: https://review.openstack.org/9995
Stable review: https://review.openstack.org/11034

As per the provisional Micro Release Exception granted to this package
by the Technical Board, we hope this contributes toward verification of
this update.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nova in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1026210

Title:
  Nova flavor ephemeral space size reported incorrectly

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1026210/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1026210] Re: Nova flavor ephemeral space size reported incorrectly

2013-05-16 Thread Yolanda Robla
Test coverage log.

** Attachment added: 2012.1.3+stable-20130405-e52e6912-0ubuntu1.log
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1026210/+attachment/3678022/+files/2012.1.3%2Bstable-20130405-e52e6912-0ubuntu1.log

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nova in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1026210

Title:
  Nova flavor ephemeral space size reported incorrectly

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1026210/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1026210] Verification report.

2013-05-16 Thread Yolanda Robla
Please find the attached test log from the Ubuntu Server Team's CI
infrastructure.  As part of the verification process for this bug, Nova
has been deployed and configured across multiple nodes using precise-
proposed as an installation source.  After successful bring-up and
configuration of the cluster, a number of exercises and smoke tests have
be invoked to ensure the updated package did not introduce any
regressions. A number of test iterations were carried out to catch any
possible transient errors.

Please Note the list of installed packages at the top and bottom of the
report.

For records of upstream test coverage of this update, please see the
Jenkins links in the comments of the relevant  upstream code-review(s):

Trunk review: https://review.openstack.org/9995
Stable review: https://review.openstack.org/11034

As per the provisional Micro Release Exception granted to this package
by the Technical Board, we hope this contributes toward verification of
this update.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nova in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1026210

Title:
  Nova flavor ephemeral space size reported incorrectly

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1026210/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1026210] Re: Nova flavor ephemeral space size reported incorrectly

2013-05-16 Thread Yolanda Robla
Test coverage log.

** Attachment added: 2012.1.3+stable-20130405-e52e6912-0ubuntu1.log
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1026210/+attachment/3678039/+files/2012.1.3%2Bstable-20130405-e52e6912-0ubuntu1.log

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nova in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1026210

Title:
  Nova flavor ephemeral space size reported incorrectly

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1026210/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1017633] Verification report.

2013-05-16 Thread Yolanda Robla
Please find the attached test log from the Ubuntu Server Team's CI
infrastructure.  As part of the verification process for this bug, Nova
has been deployed and configured across multiple nodes using precise-
proposed as an installation source.  After successful bring-up and
configuration of the cluster, a number of exercises and smoke tests have
be invoked to ensure the updated package did not introduce any
regressions. A number of test iterations were carried out to catch any
possible transient errors.

Please Note the list of installed packages at the top and bottom of the
report.

For records of upstream test coverage of this update, please see the
Jenkins links in the comments of the relevant  upstream code-review(s):

Trunk review: https://review.openstack.org/8971
Stable review: https://review.openstack.org/13678

As per the provisional Micro Release Exception granted to this package
by the Technical Board, we hope this contributes toward verification of
this update.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nova in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1017633

Title:
  deallocate_fixed_ip attempts to update an already deleted fixed_ip

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1017633/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1017633] Re: deallocate_fixed_ip attempts to update an already deleted fixed_ip

2013-05-16 Thread Yolanda Robla
Test coverage log.

** Attachment added: 2012.1.3+stable-20130405-e52e6912-0ubuntu1.log
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1017633/+attachment/3678012/+files/2012.1.3%2Bstable-20130405-e52e6912-0ubuntu1.log

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nova in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1017633

Title:
  deallocate_fixed_ip attempts to update an already deleted fixed_ip

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1017633/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1017633] Verification report.

2013-05-16 Thread Yolanda Robla
Please find the attached test log from the Ubuntu Server Team's CI
infrastructure.  As part of the verification process for this bug, Nova
has been deployed and configured across multiple nodes using precise-
proposed as an installation source.  After successful bring-up and
configuration of the cluster, a number of exercises and smoke tests have
be invoked to ensure the updated package did not introduce any
regressions. A number of test iterations were carried out to catch any
possible transient errors.

Please Note the list of installed packages at the top and bottom of the
report.

For records of upstream test coverage of this update, please see the
Jenkins links in the comments of the relevant  upstream code-review(s):

Trunk review: https://review.openstack.org/8971
Stable review: https://review.openstack.org/13678

As per the provisional Micro Release Exception granted to this package
by the Technical Board, we hope this contributes toward verification of
this update.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nova in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1017633

Title:
  deallocate_fixed_ip attempts to update an already deleted fixed_ip

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1017633/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1017633] Re: deallocate_fixed_ip attempts to update an already deleted fixed_ip

2013-05-16 Thread Yolanda Robla
Test coverage log.

** Attachment added: 2012.1.3+stable-20130405-e52e6912-0ubuntu1.log
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1017633/+attachment/3678028/+files/2012.1.3%2Bstable-20130405-e52e6912-0ubuntu1.log

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nova in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1017633

Title:
  deallocate_fixed_ip attempts to update an already deleted fixed_ip

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1017633/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1004791] Verification report.

2013-05-16 Thread Yolanda Robla
Please find the attached test log from the Ubuntu Server Team's CI
infrastructure.  As part of the verification process for this bug, Nova
has been deployed and configured across multiple nodes using precise-
proposed as an installation source.  After successful bring-up and
configuration of the cluster, a number of exercises and smoke tests have
be invoked to ensure the updated package did not introduce any
regressions. A number of test iterations were carried out to catch any
possible transient errors.

Please Note the list of installed packages at the top and bottom of the
report.

For records of upstream test coverage of this update, please see the
Jenkins links in the comments of the relevant  upstream code-review(s):

Trunk review: https://review.openstack.org/9175
Stable review: https://review.openstack.org/12661

As per the provisional Micro Release Exception granted to this package
by the Technical Board, we hope this contributes toward verification of
this update.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nova in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1004791

Title:
  When attach volume lost attach when node restart

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1004791/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1004791] Re: When attach volume lost attach when node restart

2013-05-16 Thread Yolanda Robla
Test coverage log.

** Attachment added: 2012.1.3+stable-20130405-e52e6912-0ubuntu1.log
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1004791/+attachment/3678019/+files/2012.1.3%2Bstable-20130405-e52e6912-0ubuntu1.log

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nova in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1004791

Title:
  When attach volume lost attach when node restart

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1004791/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1004791] Verification report.

2013-05-16 Thread Yolanda Robla
Please find the attached test log from the Ubuntu Server Team's CI
infrastructure.  As part of the verification process for this bug, Nova
has been deployed and configured across multiple nodes using precise-
proposed as an installation source.  After successful bring-up and
configuration of the cluster, a number of exercises and smoke tests have
be invoked to ensure the updated package did not introduce any
regressions. A number of test iterations were carried out to catch any
possible transient errors.

Please Note the list of installed packages at the top and bottom of the
report.

For records of upstream test coverage of this update, please see the
Jenkins links in the comments of the relevant  upstream code-review(s):

Trunk review: https://review.openstack.org/9175
Stable review: https://review.openstack.org/12661

As per the provisional Micro Release Exception granted to this package
by the Technical Board, we hope this contributes toward verification of
this update.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nova in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1004791

Title:
  When attach volume lost attach when node restart

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1004791/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1004791] Re: When attach volume lost attach when node restart

2013-05-16 Thread Yolanda Robla
Test coverage log.

** Attachment added: 2012.1.3+stable-20130405-e52e6912-0ubuntu1.log
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1004791/+attachment/3678035/+files/2012.1.3%2Bstable-20130405-e52e6912-0ubuntu1.log

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nova in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1004791

Title:
  When attach volume lost attach when node restart

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1004791/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 996482] Verification report.

2013-05-16 Thread Yolanda Robla
Please find the attached test log from the Ubuntu Server Team's CI
infrastructure.  As part of the verification process for this bug, Nova
has been deployed and configured across multiple nodes using precise-
proposed as an installation source.  After successful bring-up and
configuration of the cluster, a number of exercises and smoke tests have
be invoked to ensure the updated package did not introduce any
regressions. A number of test iterations were carried out to catch any
possible transient errors.

Please Note the list of installed packages at the top and bottom of the
report.

For records of upstream test coverage of this update, please see the
Jenkins links in the comments of the relevant  upstream code-review(s):

Trunk review: https://review.openstack.org/7515
Stable review: https://review.openstack.org/13681

As per the provisional Micro Release Exception granted to this package
by the Technical Board, we hope this contributes toward verification of
this update.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nova in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/996482

Title:
  failed to allocate fixed ip because old deleted one exists

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/996482/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 996482] Re: failed to allocate fixed ip because old deleted one exists

2013-05-16 Thread Yolanda Robla
Test coverage log.

** Attachment added: 2012.1.3+stable-20130405-e52e6912-0ubuntu1.log
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/996482/+attachment/3678013/+files/2012.1.3%2Bstable-20130405-e52e6912-0ubuntu1.log

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nova in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/996482

Title:
  failed to allocate fixed ip because old deleted one exists

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/996482/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 996482] Verification report.

2013-05-16 Thread Yolanda Robla
Please find the attached test log from the Ubuntu Server Team's CI
infrastructure.  As part of the verification process for this bug, Nova
has been deployed and configured across multiple nodes using precise-
proposed as an installation source.  After successful bring-up and
configuration of the cluster, a number of exercises and smoke tests have
be invoked to ensure the updated package did not introduce any
regressions. A number of test iterations were carried out to catch any
possible transient errors.

Please Note the list of installed packages at the top and bottom of the
report.

For records of upstream test coverage of this update, please see the
Jenkins links in the comments of the relevant  upstream code-review(s):

Trunk review: https://review.openstack.org/7515
Stable review: https://review.openstack.org/13681

As per the provisional Micro Release Exception granted to this package
by the Technical Board, we hope this contributes toward verification of
this update.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nova in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/996482

Title:
  failed to allocate fixed ip because old deleted one exists

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/996482/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 996482] Re: failed to allocate fixed ip because old deleted one exists

2013-05-16 Thread Yolanda Robla
Test coverage log.

** Attachment added: 2012.1.3+stable-20130405-e52e6912-0ubuntu1.log
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/996482/+attachment/3678029/+files/2012.1.3%2Bstable-20130405-e52e6912-0ubuntu1.log

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nova in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/996482

Title:
  failed to allocate fixed ip because old deleted one exists

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/996482/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 921774] Verification report.

2013-05-16 Thread Yolanda Robla
Please find the attached test log from the Ubuntu Server Team's CI
infrastructure.  As part of the verification process for this bug, Nova
has been deployed and configured across multiple nodes using precise-
proposed as an installation source.  After successful bring-up and
configuration of the cluster, a number of exercises and smoke tests have
be invoked to ensure the updated package did not introduce any
regressions. A number of test iterations were carried out to catch any
possible transient errors.

Please Note the list of installed packages at the top and bottom of the
report.

For records of upstream test coverage of this update, please see the
Jenkins links in the comments of the relevant  upstream code-review(s):

Trunk review: https://review.openstack.org/12390
Stable review: https://review.openstack.org/12395

As per the provisional Micro Release Exception granted to this package
by the Technical Board, we hope this contributes toward verification of
this update.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nova in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/921774

Title:
  snapshot stays in saving state if the vm base image is deleted

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/921774/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 921774] Re: snapshot stays in saving state if the vm base image is deleted

2013-05-16 Thread Yolanda Robla
Test coverage log.

** Attachment added: 2012.1.3+stable-20130405-e52e6912-0ubuntu1.log
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/921774/+attachment/3678014/+files/2012.1.3%2Bstable-20130405-e52e6912-0ubuntu1.log

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nova in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/921774

Title:
  snapshot stays in saving state if the vm base image is deleted

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/921774/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 921774] Verification report.

2013-05-16 Thread Yolanda Robla
Please find the attached test log from the Ubuntu Server Team's CI
infrastructure.  As part of the verification process for this bug, Nova
has been deployed and configured across multiple nodes using precise-
proposed as an installation source.  After successful bring-up and
configuration of the cluster, a number of exercises and smoke tests have
be invoked to ensure the updated package did not introduce any
regressions. A number of test iterations were carried out to catch any
possible transient errors.

Please Note the list of installed packages at the top and bottom of the
report.

For records of upstream test coverage of this update, please see the
Jenkins links in the comments of the relevant  upstream code-review(s):

Trunk review: https://review.openstack.org/12390
Stable review: https://review.openstack.org/12395

As per the provisional Micro Release Exception granted to this package
by the Technical Board, we hope this contributes toward verification of
this update.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nova in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/921774

Title:
  snapshot stays in saving state if the vm base image is deleted

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/921774/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 921774] Re: snapshot stays in saving state if the vm base image is deleted

2013-05-16 Thread Yolanda Robla
Test coverage log.

** Attachment added: 2012.1.3+stable-20130405-e52e6912-0ubuntu1.log
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/921774/+attachment/3678030/+files/2012.1.3%2Bstable-20130405-e52e6912-0ubuntu1.log

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nova in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/921774

Title:
  snapshot stays in saving state if the vm base image is deleted

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/921774/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1089488] Verification report.

2013-05-16 Thread Yolanda Robla
Please find the attached test log from the Ubuntu Server Team's CI
infrastructure.  As part of the verification process for this bug,
Glance has been deployed and configured across multiple nodes using
precise-proposed as an installation source.  After successful bring-up
and configuration of the cluster, a number of exercises and smoke tests
have be invoked to ensure the updated package did not introduce any
regressions. A number of test iterations were carried out to catch any
possible transient errors.

Please Note the list of installed packages at the top and bottom of the
report.

As per the provisional Micro Release Exception granted to this package
by the Technical Board, we hope this contributes toward verification of
this update.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nova in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1089488

Title:
  Meta bug for tracking Openstack Stable Updates

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/glance/+bug/1089488/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1089488] Re: Meta bug for tracking Openstack Stable Updates

2013-05-16 Thread Yolanda Robla
Test coverage log.

** Attachment added: 2012.1.3+stable-20130423-74b067df-0ubuntu1.log
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1089488/+attachment/3678041/+files/2012.1.3%2Bstable-20130423-74b067df-0ubuntu1.log

** Tags removed: verification-needed
** Tags added: verification-done

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nova in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1089488

Title:
  Meta bug for tracking Openstack Stable Updates

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/glance/+bug/1089488/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1075859] Re: use_single_default_gateway does not function correctly

2013-05-16 Thread Yolanda Robla
** Tags removed: verification-needed
** Tags added: verification-done

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nova in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1075859

Title:
  use_single_default_gateway does not function correctly

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1075859/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1079745] Re: Essex 2012.1.3 : Error deleting instance with 2 Nova Volumes attached

2013-05-16 Thread Yolanda Robla
** Tags removed: verification-needed
** Tags added: verification-done

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nova in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1079745

Title:
  Essex 2012.1.3 : Error deleting instance with 2 Nova Volumes attached

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1079745/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1073569] Re: Jenkins jobs fail because of incompatibility between sqlalchemy-migrate and the newest sqlalchemy-0.8.0b1

2013-05-16 Thread Yolanda Robla
Test coverage log.

** Attachment added: 2012.1.3+stable-20130423-74b067df-0ubuntu1.log
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1073569/+attachment/3678043/+files/2012.1.3%2Bstable-20130423-74b067df-0ubuntu1.log

** Tags removed: verification-needed
** Tags added: verification-done

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nova in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1073569

Title:
  Jenkins jobs fail because of incompatibility between sqlalchemy-
  migrate and the newest sqlalchemy-0.8.0b1

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/cinder/+bug/1073569/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1073569] Verification report.

2013-05-16 Thread Yolanda Robla
Please find the attached test log from the Ubuntu Server Team's CI
infrastructure.  As part of the verification process for this bug,
Glance has been deployed and configured across multiple nodes using
precise-proposed as an installation source.  After successful bring-up
and configuration of the cluster, a number of exercises and smoke tests
have be invoked to ensure the updated package did not introduce any
regressions. A number of test iterations were carried out to catch any
possible transient errors.

Please Note the list of installed packages at the top and bottom of the
report.

For records of upstream test coverage of this update, please see the
Jenkins links in the comments of the relevant  upstream code-review(s):

Trunk review: https://review.openstack.org/15098
Stable review: https://review.openstack.org/22943

As per the provisional Micro Release Exception granted to this package
by the Technical Board, we hope this contributes toward verification of
this update.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nova in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1073569

Title:
  Jenkins jobs fail because of incompatibility between sqlalchemy-
  migrate and the newest sqlalchemy-0.8.0b1

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/cinder/+bug/1073569/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1062314] Re: do_refresh_security_group_rules in nova.virt.firewall is very slow

2013-05-16 Thread Yolanda Robla
** Tags removed: verification-needed
** Tags added: verification-done

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nova in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1062314

Title:
  do_refresh_security_group_rules in nova.virt.firewall is very slow

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1062314/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1057125] Verification report.

2013-05-16 Thread Yolanda Robla
Please find the attached test log from the Ubuntu Server Team's CI
infrastructure.  As part of the verification process for this bug,
Horizon has been deployed and configured across multiple nodes using
precise-proposed as an installation source.  After successful bring-up
and configuration of the cluster, a number of exercises and smoke tests
have be invoked to ensure the updated package did not introduce any
regressions. A number of test iterations were carried out to catch any
possible transient errors.

Please Note the list of installed packages at the top and bottom of the
report.

For records of upstream test coverage of this update, please see the
Jenkins links in the comments of the relevant  upstream code-review(s):

Stable review: https://review.openstack.org/13727

As per the provisional Micro Release Exception granted to this package
by the Technical Board, we hope this contributes toward verification of
this update.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to horizon in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1057125

Title:
  stable/essex horizon installs unusable version of glance

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/horizon/+bug/1057125/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1057125] Re: stable/essex horizon installs unusable version of glance

2013-05-16 Thread Yolanda Robla
Test coverage log.

** Attachment added: 2012.1.3+stable-20130423-5ce39422-0ubuntu1.log
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1057125/+attachment/3678044/+files/2012.1.3%2Bstable-20130423-5ce39422-0ubuntu1.log

** Tags removed: verification-needed
** Tags added: verification-done

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to horizon in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1057125

Title:
  stable/essex horizon installs unusable version of glance

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/horizon/+bug/1057125/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1051924] Re: lock files may be removed in error dues to permissions issues

2013-05-16 Thread Yolanda Robla
** Tags removed: verification-needed
** Tags added: verification-done

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nova in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1051924

Title:
  lock files may be removed in error dues to permissions issues

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/essex/+bug/1051924/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1050982] Re: ensure_default_security_group() does not call sgh

2013-05-16 Thread Yolanda Robla
** Tags removed: verification-needed
** Tags added: verification-done

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nova in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1050982

Title:
  ensure_default_security_group() does not call sgh

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1050982/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1045152] Re: Heavily loaded nova-compute instances don't sent reports frequently enough

2013-05-16 Thread Yolanda Robla
** Tags removed: verification-needed
** Tags added: verification-done

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nova in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1045152

Title:
  Heavily loaded nova-compute instances don't sent reports frequently
  enough

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1045152/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1043999] Re: nova usage-list returns wrong usage

2013-05-16 Thread Yolanda Robla
** Tags removed: verification-needed
** Tags added: verification-done

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nova in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1043999

Title:
  nova usage-list returns  wrong usage

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1043999/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1046313] Re: At termination, LXC rootfs is not always unmounted before rmtree() is called

2013-05-16 Thread Yolanda Robla
** Tags removed: verification-needed
** Tags added: verification-done

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nova in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1046313

Title:
  At termination, LXC rootfs is not always unmounted before rmtree() is
  called

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1046313/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1040537] Re: Bridge port's hairpin mode not set after resuming a machine

2013-05-16 Thread Yolanda Robla
** Tags removed: verification-needed
** Tags added: verification-done

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nova in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1040537

Title:
  Bridge port's hairpin mode not set after resuming a machine

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1040537/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1039077] Verification report.

2013-05-16 Thread Yolanda Robla
Please find the attached test log from the Ubuntu Server Team's CI
infrastructure.  As part of the verification process for this bug,
Horizon has been deployed and configured across multiple nodes using
precise-proposed as an installation source.  After successful bring-up
and configuration of the cluster, a number of exercises and smoke tests
have be invoked to ensure the updated package did not introduce any
regressions. A number of test iterations were carried out to catch any
possible transient errors.

Please Note the list of installed packages at the top and bottom of the
report.

For records of upstream test coverage of this update, please see the
Jenkins links in the comments of the relevant  upstream code-review(s):

Stable review: https://review.openstack.org/12193

As per the provisional Micro Release Exception granted to this package
by the Technical Board, we hope this contributes toward verification of
this update.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to horizon in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1039077

Title:
  open redirect / phishing attack via next parameter

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/horizon/+bug/1039077/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1039077] Re: open redirect / phishing attack via next parameter

2013-05-16 Thread Yolanda Robla
Test coverage log.

** Attachment added: 2012.1.3+stable-20130423-5ce39422-0ubuntu1.log
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1039077/+attachment/3678045/+files/2012.1.3%2Bstable-20130423-5ce39422-0ubuntu1.log

** Tags removed: verification-needed
** Tags added: verification-done

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to horizon in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1039077

Title:
  open redirect / phishing attack via next parameter

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/horizon/+bug/1039077/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1031291] Verification report.

2013-05-16 Thread Yolanda Robla
Please find the attached test log from the Ubuntu Server Team's CI
infrastructure.  As part of the verification process for this bug,
Horizon has been deployed and configured across multiple nodes using
precise-proposed as an installation source.  After successful bring-up
and configuration of the cluster, a number of exercises and smoke tests
have be invoked to ensure the updated package did not introduce any
regressions. A number of test iterations were carried out to catch any
possible transient errors.

Please Note the list of installed packages at the top and bottom of the
report.

For records of upstream test coverage of this update, please see the
Jenkins links in the comments of the relevant  upstream code-review(s):

Stable review: https://review.openstack.org/11859

As per the provisional Micro Release Exception granted to this package
by the Technical Board, we hope this contributes toward verification of
this update.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to horizon in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1031291

Title:
  TypeError when trying to delete an unnamed volume via dashboard

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/horizon/+bug/1031291/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1020555] Verification report.

2013-05-16 Thread Yolanda Robla
Please find the attached test log from the Ubuntu Server Team's CI
infrastructure.  As part of the verification process for this bug,
Horizon has been deployed and configured across multiple nodes using
precise-proposed as an installation source.  After successful bring-up
and configuration of the cluster, a number of exercises and smoke tests
have be invoked to ensure the updated package did not introduce any
regressions. A number of test iterations were carried out to catch any
possible transient errors.

Please Note the list of installed packages at the top and bottom of the
report.

For records of upstream test coverage of this update, please see the
Jenkins links in the comments of the relevant  upstream code-review(s):

Trunk review: https://review.openstack.org/11360
Stable review: https://review.openstack.org/11708

As per the provisional Micro Release Exception granted to this package
by the Technical Board, we hope this contributes toward verification of
this update.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to horizon in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1020555

Title:
  Wrong 'Download CSV Summary' link

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/horizon/+bug/1020555/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1026210] Re: Nova flavor ephemeral space size reported incorrectly

2013-05-16 Thread Yolanda Robla
** Tags removed: verification-needed
** Tags added: verification-done

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nova in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1026210

Title:
  Nova flavor ephemeral space size reported incorrectly

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1026210/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1017633] Re: deallocate_fixed_ip attempts to update an already deleted fixed_ip

2013-05-16 Thread Yolanda Robla
** Tags removed: verification-needed
** Tags added: verification-done

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nova in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1017633

Title:
  deallocate_fixed_ip attempts to update an already deleted fixed_ip

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1017633/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1020555] Re: Wrong 'Download CSV Summary' link

2013-05-16 Thread Yolanda Robla
Test coverage log.

** Attachment added: 2012.1.3+stable-20130423-5ce39422-0ubuntu1.log
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1020555/+attachment/3678047/+files/2012.1.3%2Bstable-20130423-5ce39422-0ubuntu1.log

** Tags removed: verification-needed
** Tags added: verification-done

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to horizon in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1020555

Title:
  Wrong 'Download CSV Summary' link

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/horizon/+bug/1020555/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 997669] Verification report.

2013-05-16 Thread Yolanda Robla
Please find the attached test log from the Ubuntu Server Team's CI
infrastructure.  As part of the verification process for this bug,
Horizon has been deployed and configured across multiple nodes using
precise-proposed as an installation source.  After successful bring-up
and configuration of the cluster, a number of exercises and smoke tests
have be invoked to ensure the updated package did not introduce any
regressions. A number of test iterations were carried out to catch any
possible transient errors.

Please Note the list of installed packages at the top and bottom of the
report.

For records of upstream test coverage of this update, please see the
Jenkins links in the comments of the relevant  upstream code-review(s):

Trunk review: https://review.openstack.org/8446
Stable review: https://review.openstack.org/10078

As per the provisional Micro Release Exception granted to this package
by the Technical Board, we hope this contributes toward verification of
this update.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to horizon in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/997669

Title:
  When adding ICMP rule, the type/code is being validated as from/to
  ports

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/horizon/+bug/997669/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 997669] Re: When adding ICMP rule, the type/code is being validated as from/to ports

2013-05-16 Thread Yolanda Robla
Test coverage log.

** Attachment added: 2012.1.3+stable-20130423-5ce39422-0ubuntu1.log
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/997669/+attachment/3678048/+files/2012.1.3%2Bstable-20130423-5ce39422-0ubuntu1.log

** Tags removed: verification-needed
** Tags added: verification-done

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to horizon in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/997669

Title:
  When adding ICMP rule, the type/code is being validated as from/to
  ports

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/horizon/+bug/997669/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1031291] Re: TypeError when trying to delete an unnamed volume via dashboard

2013-05-16 Thread Yolanda Robla
Test coverage log.

** Attachment added: 2012.1.3+stable-20130423-5ce39422-0ubuntu1.log
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1031291/+attachment/3678046/+files/2012.1.3%2Bstable-20130423-5ce39422-0ubuntu1.log

** Tags removed: verification-needed
** Tags added: verification-done

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to horizon in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1031291

Title:
  TypeError when trying to delete an unnamed volume via dashboard

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/horizon/+bug/1031291/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 921774] Re: snapshot stays in saving state if the vm base image is deleted

2013-05-16 Thread Yolanda Robla
** Tags removed: verification-needed
** Tags added: verification-done

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nova in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/921774

Title:
  snapshot stays in saving state if the vm base image is deleted

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/921774/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 996482] Re: failed to allocate fixed ip because old deleted one exists

2013-05-16 Thread Yolanda Robla
** Tags removed: verification-needed
** Tags added: verification-done

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nova in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/996482

Title:
  failed to allocate fixed ip because old deleted one exists

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/996482/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1004791] Re: When attach volume lost attach when node restart

2013-05-16 Thread Yolanda Robla
** Tags removed: verification-needed
** Tags added: verification-done

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nova in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1004791

Title:
  When attach volume lost attach when node restart

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1004791/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1064914] Verification report.

2013-05-16 Thread Yolanda Robla
Please find the attached test log from the Ubuntu Server Team's CI
infrastructure.  As part of the verification process for this bug,
Keystone has been deployed and configured across multiple nodes using
precise-proposed as an installation source.  After successful bring-up
and configuration of the cluster, a number of exercises and smoke tests
have be invoked to ensure the updated package did not introduce any
regressions. A number of test iterations were carried out to catch any
possible transient errors.

Please Note the list of installed packages at the top and bottom of the
report.

For records of upstream test coverage of this update, please see the
Jenkins links in the comments of the relevant  upstream code-review(s):

Trunk review: https://review.openstack.org/16028
Stable review: https://review.openstack.org/16760

As per the provisional Micro Release Exception granted to this package
by the Technical Board, we hope this contributes toward verification of
this update.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to keystone in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1064914

Title:
  Removing user from a tenant isn't invalidating user access to tenant

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/keystone/+bug/1064914/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1064914] Re: Removing user from a tenant isn't invalidating user access to tenant

2013-05-16 Thread Yolanda Robla
Test coverage log.

** Attachment added: 2012.1.3+stable-20130423-f48dd0fc-0ubuntu1.log
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1064914/+attachment/3678050/+files/2012.1.3%2Bstable-20130423-f48dd0fc-0ubuntu1.log

** Tags removed: verification-needed
** Tags added: verification-done

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to keystone in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1064914

Title:
  Removing user from a tenant isn't invalidating user access to tenant

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/keystone/+bug/1064914/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1056373] Verification report.

2013-05-16 Thread Yolanda Robla
Please find the attached test log from the Ubuntu Server Team's CI
infrastructure.  As part of the verification process for this bug,
Keystone has been deployed and configured across multiple nodes using
precise-proposed as an installation source.  After successful bring-up
and configuration of the cluster, a number of exercises and smoke tests
have be invoked to ensure the updated package did not introduce any
regressions. A number of test iterations were carried out to catch any
possible transient errors.

Please Note the list of installed packages at the top and bottom of the
report.

For records of upstream test coverage of this update, please see the
Jenkins links in the comments of the relevant  upstream code-review(s):

Trunk review: https://review.openstack.org/13652
Stable review: https://review.openstack.org/13718

As per the provisional Micro Release Exception granted to this package
by the Technical Board, we hope this contributes toward verification of
this update.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to keystone in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1056373

Title:
  memcache driver needs protection against unicode user keys

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/keystone/+bug/1056373/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1056373] Re: memcache driver needs protection against unicode user keys

2013-05-16 Thread Yolanda Robla
Test coverage log.

** Attachment added: 2012.1.3+stable-20130423-f48dd0fc-0ubuntu1.log
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1056373/+attachment/3678051/+files/2012.1.3%2Bstable-20130423-f48dd0fc-0ubuntu1.log

** Tags removed: verification-needed
** Tags added: verification-done

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to keystone in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1056373

Title:
  memcache driver needs protection against unicode user keys

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/keystone/+bug/1056373/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >