[Bug 1894942] Re: [UBUNTU 20.04] Lost virtio host --> guest notifications cause devices to cease normal operation

2020-10-12 Thread Christian Ehrhardt 
** Changed in: qemu (Ubuntu Bionic)
   Status: Incomplete => Triaged

** Changed in: qemu (Ubuntu Xenial)
   Status: Incomplete => Triaged

** Changed in: qemu (Ubuntu Xenial)
   Importance: Undecided => Low

** Changed in: qemu (Ubuntu Bionic)
   Importance: Undecided => Medium

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1894942

Title:
  [UBUNTU 20.04] Lost virtio host --> guest notifications cause devices
  to cease normal operation

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-z-systems/+bug/1894942/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1887190] Re: MSFT Touchpad not working on Lenovo Legion-5 15ARH05

2020-10-12 Thread Azizkhan
> i2c-hid.polling_mode=1 to the kernel boot parameters to make the
touchpad work.
you mean that I can just flash 5.9 kernel and then add to grub this line:
GRUB_CMDLINE_LINUX_DEFAULT="quiet splash video.use_native_backlight=1 
i2c-hid.polling_mode=1"

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1887190

Title:
  MSFT Touchpad not working on Lenovo Legion-5 15ARH05

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/pop-os/+bug/1887190/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1888992] Missing required logs.

2020-10-12 Thread Ubuntu Kernel Bot
This bug is missing log files that will aid in diagnosing the problem.
While running an Ubuntu kernel (not a mainline or third-party kernel)
please enter the following command in a terminal window:

apport-collect 1888992

and then change the status of the bug to 'Confirmed'.

If, due to the nature of the issue you have encountered, you are unable
to run this command, please add a comment stating that fact and change
the bug status to 'Confirmed'.

This change has been made by an automated script, maintained by the
Ubuntu Kernel Team.

** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Incomplete

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1888992

Title:
  [Realtek ALC892, Green Headphone Out, Front] Not detecting/switching
  to front jack after plugging in headphones

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1888992/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1736222] Re: speech-dispatcher distorts all sound

2020-10-12 Thread TM
Is this relevant?  Looks it might have been swept under the rug?
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1252732

** Bug watch added: Mozilla Bugzilla #1252732
   https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1252732

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1736222

Title:
  speech-dispatcher distorts all sound

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/speech-dispatcher/+bug/1736222/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1871721] Re: Second Monitor on HDMI blank screen/blink screen with Nvidia + Intel & Ubuntu 20.04? (ASUS Laptop)

2020-10-12 Thread Kai-Heng Feng
Noctis, not yet.

I just pinged the upstream devs.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1871721

Title:
  Second Monitor on HDMI blank screen/blink screen with Nvidia + Intel &
  Ubuntu 20.04? (ASUS Laptop)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1871721/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1896740] Re: BIND crashes with failed assertion INSIST(dns_name_issubdomain(>name, >domain))

2020-10-12 Thread Christian Ehrhardt 
SRU Template added to the description and uploaded to Focal-unapproved.

** Description changed:

+ [Impact]
+ 
+  * There are rare configurations and situations that lead to bind9
+code that works like an assert aborting the daemon.
+It was found that these rare conditions can happen in some setups
+and that a log-error would be better than an abort.
+ 
+  * Backport the upstream change to help the users affected by this
+ issue.
+ 
+ [Test Case]
+ 
+  * Sadly we have no well isolated testcase yet, but an awesome and 
+responsive bug reporter who has a setup that usually triggered it a few 
+times over 1-2 weeks. Gladly the fix converts a former assert-abort 
+into a log warning. Therefore once we can check these logs and once the 
+messages appear know that the bug "would have happened but got fixed.
+ 
+ [Regression Potential]
+ 
+  * The change only is on a path that formerly was causing an abort of the 
+daemon. There a conversion of this assert to a log-warning should only 
+affect people that formerly had it crashing - and for them it is a fix.
+Other use-cases should be unaffected.
+Trying to think of regressions I can only come to e.g. CI-testcases 
+which expect fails on this case but now would work. Yet it would do so 
+as well with newer versions of bind as this is no Ubuntu Delta but a 
+backport.
+ 
+ [Other Info]
+  
+  * n/a
+ 
+ ---
+ 
  I'm running Ubuntu 20.04 and bind9 1:9.16.1-0ubuntu2.3.
  
  BIND sometimes crashes with:
  Sep 23 10:10:12  named[1146]: timed out resolving 
'www.independent.co.uk/TYPE65/IN': 2606:4700:4700::1001#53
  Sep 23 10:10:12  named[1146]: timed out resolving 
'ssc.independent.co.uk/TYPE65/IN': 2606:4700:4700::1001#53
  Sep 23 10:10:13  named[1146]: timed out resolving 
'www.independent.co.uk/TYPE65/IN': 1.0.0.1#53
  Sep 23 10:10:13  named[1146]: timed out resolving 
'ssc.independent.co.uk/TYPE65/IN': 1.0.0.1#53
  Sep 23 10:10:14  named[1146]: timed out resolving 
'www.independent.co.uk/TYPE65/IN': 2606:4700:4700::#53
  Sep 23 10:10:14  named[1146]: timed out resolving 
'ssc.independent.co.uk/TYPE65/IN': 2606:4700:4700::#53
  Sep 23 10:10:15  named[1146]: timed out resolving 
'www.independent.co.uk/TYPE65/IN': 1.1.1.1#53
  Sep 23 10:10:16  named[1146]: timed out resolving 
'ssc.independent.co.uk/TYPE65/IN': 1.1.1.1#53
  Sep 23 10:10:16  named[1146]: resolver.c:5105: 
INSIST(dns_name_issubdomain(>name, >domain)) failed, back trace
  Sep 23 10:10:16  named[1146]: #0 0x558b762dce43 in ??
  Sep 23 10:10:16  named[1146]: #1 0x7f390cf32ac0 in ??
  Sep 23 10:10:16  named[1146]: #2 0x7f390d0fb12d in ??
  Sep 23 10:10:16  named[1146]: #3 0x7f390d0fe940 in ??
  Sep 23 10:10:16  named[1146]: #4 0x7f390d104888 in ??
  Sep 23 10:10:16  named[1146]: #5 0x7f390d108f21 in ??
  Sep 23 10:10:16  named[1146]: #6 0x7f390d109a66 in ??
  Sep 23 10:10:16  named[1146]: #7 0x7f390d109ec6 in ??
  Sep 23 10:10:16  named[1146]: #8 0x7f390cf59fe1 in ??
  Sep 23 10:10:16  named[1146]: #9 0x7f390ca22609 in ??
  Sep 23 10:10:16  named[1146]: #10 0x7f390c943103 in ??
  Sep 23 10:10:16  named[1146]: exiting (due to assertion failure)
  
  The crash has ocurred repeatedly on multiple hosts.
  
  In all cases I observed BIND has logged timeouts immediately before each
  crash.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1896740

Title:
  BIND crashes with failed assertion
  INSIST(dns_name_issubdomain(>name, >domain))

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bind9/+bug/1896740/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1888992] Re: [Realtek ALC892, Green Headphone Out, Front] Not detecting/switching to front jack after plugging in headphones

2020-10-12 Thread Kai-Heng Feng
** Package changed: alsa-driver (Ubuntu) => linux (Ubuntu)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1888992

Title:
  [Realtek ALC892, Green Headphone Out, Front] Not detecting/switching
  to front jack after plugging in headphones

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1888992/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1893818] Re: Several blockprobe errors if trying to install the groovy daily live on LPAR

2020-10-12 Thread Frank Heimes
** Changed in: ubuntu-z-systems
   Status: New => Confirmed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1893818

Title:
  Several blockprobe errors if trying to install the groovy daily live
  on LPAR

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/curtin/+bug/1893818/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1891100] Re: hp notebook 15-da0001nk sound mute led not working

2020-10-12 Thread Kai-Heng Feng
Oh, does the laptop have both mute led and mic-mute led? Is mic-mute LED
working?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1891100

Title:
  hp notebook 15-da0001nk sound mute led not working

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1891100/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1891100] Re: hp notebook 15-da0001nk sound mute led not working

2020-10-12 Thread Kai-Heng Feng
Does mute led work now?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1891100

Title:
  hp notebook 15-da0001nk sound mute led not working

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1891100/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1898000] Re: bogus handling of DAEMON_OPTS by chronyd-starter.sh

2020-10-12 Thread Christian Ehrhardt 
Uploaded to groovy and not requiring an FFe (since it is a small and pure fix).
Never the less it will wait a bit until the release Team approves it since we 
are in Freeze for 20.10.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1898000

Title:
  bogus handling of DAEMON_OPTS by chronyd-starter.sh

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/chrony/+bug/1898000/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1892266] Re: open-vm-tools 11.1.5 has been released

2020-10-12 Thread Christian Ehrhardt 
I beg (all) your pardon, the first upload had a bad bug reference and triggerd 
the last backport.
I have reset the state there to be correct again 
(https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/open-vm-tools/+bug/1877672/comments/14)

I have uploaded a new 2:11.1.5-1~ubuntu20.04.2 to Focal with a correct
bug reference (otherwise identical) to replace what we have in focal-
proposed.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1892266

Title:
  open-vm-tools 11.1.5 has been released

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/open-vm-tools/+bug/1892266/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1877672] Re: open-vm-tools 11.1.0 released

2020-10-12 Thread Christian Ehrhardt 
I had a wrong bug reference - sorry my bad for disturbing this old bug.
I'll have it overwritten in -proposed with a fixed upload.
Let me set this one here back to Released.

** Changed in: open-vm-tools (Ubuntu Focal)
   Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released

** Tags removed: verification-needed verification-needed-focal
** Tags added: verification-done verification-done-focal

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1877672

Title:
  open-vm-tools 11.1.0 released

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/open-vm-tools/+bug/1877672/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1899576] [NEW] ubuntu-bug ubuntu-release-upgrader-core

2020-10-12 Thread schezard
Public bug reported:

ubuntu-bug ubuntu-release-upgrader-core

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 18.04
Package: ubuntu-release-upgrader-core 1:18.04.38
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.15.0-118.119-generic 4.15.18
Uname: Linux 4.15.0-118-generic x86_64
ApportVersion: 2.20.9-0ubuntu7.17
Architecture: amd64
CrashDB: ubuntu
CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME
Date: Mon Oct 12 23:46:59 2020
InstallationDate: Installed on 2017-11-14 (1063 days ago)
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 16.04.1 LTS "Xenial Xerus" - Release amd64 (20160719)
PackageArchitecture: all
SourcePackage: ubuntu-release-upgrader
UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to bionic on 2020-10-13 (0 days ago)
VarLogDistupgradeTermlog:

** Affects: ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug bionic dist-upgrade third-party-packages

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1899576

Title:
  ubuntu-bug ubuntu-release-upgrader-core

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+bug/1899576/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1899572] [NEW] could not install jskeus under 20.04

2020-10-12 Thread Kei Okada
Public bug reported:

The jskeus package is not released under 20.04
```
ubuntu-20$ sudo apt install jskeus
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
E: Unable to locate package jskeus
```

Since euslisp (which is installable under 20.04) best work with jskeus,
we require to install jskeus 20.04 LTS

** Affects: jskeus (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1899572

Title:
  could not install jskeus under 20.04

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/jskeus/+bug/1899572/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1891511] Re: dpkg: error: cannot access the file '/.deb': File or directory does not exist

2020-10-12 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
[Expired for grub2-signed (Ubuntu) because there has been no activity
for 60 days.]

** Changed in: grub2-signed (Ubuntu)
   Status: Incomplete => Expired

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1891511

Title:
  dpkg: error: cannot access the file '/.deb': File or directory does
  not exist

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub2-signed/+bug/1891511/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1717127] Re: libomp5 and libomp-dev should be updated to the 5.0.0 release

2020-10-12 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
[Expired for llvm-toolchain-5.0 (Ubuntu) because there has been no
activity for 60 days.]

** Changed in: llvm-toolchain-5.0 (Ubuntu)
   Status: Incomplete => Expired

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1717127

Title:
  libomp5 and libomp-dev should be updated to the 5.0.0 release

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/llvm-toolchain-5.0/+bug/1717127/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1891238] Re: [RM] neutron-fwaas

2020-10-12 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
[Expired for neutron-fwaas (Ubuntu) because there has been no activity
for 60 days.]

** Changed in: neutron-fwaas (Ubuntu)
   Status: Incomplete => Expired

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1891238

Title:
  [RM] neutron-fwaas

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/neutron-fwaas/+bug/1891238/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1891579] Re: Security enhanced Ubuntu distribution that would maintain system integrity.

2020-10-12 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
[Expired for linux (Ubuntu) because there has been no activity for 60
days.]

** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
   Status: Incomplete => Expired

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1891579

Title:
  Security enhanced Ubuntu distribution that would maintain system
  integrity.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1891579/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1891450] Re: Settings > Sound > Inputs ON/OFF toggle does not show true microphone state

2020-10-12 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
[Expired for gnome-control-center (Ubuntu) because there has been no
activity for 60 days.]

** Changed in: gnome-control-center (Ubuntu)
   Status: Incomplete => Expired

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1891450

Title:
  Settings > Sound > Inputs ON/OFF toggle does not show true microphone
  state

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-control-center/+bug/1891450/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1876486] Re: systemd breaks due to old libsecomp libs left on the system

2020-10-12 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
[Expired for libseccomp (Ubuntu) because there has been no activity for
60 days.]

** Changed in: libseccomp (Ubuntu)
   Status: Incomplete => Expired

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1876486

Title:
  systemd breaks due to old libsecomp libs left on the system

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libseccomp/+bug/1876486/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1889342] Re: Thunderbolt Dock Loses Monitors

2020-10-12 Thread koba
I tried that connect two monitors on wd19tb.
can't trigger the issue on my side.
Can you confirm is the issue be triggered after the fresh installation!?
Thanks your effort

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1889342

Title:
  Thunderbolt Dock Loses Monitors

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1889342/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1896919] Re: [SRU] g-c-c: The hdmi/dp profiles are not set automatically in the combo list after selecting the hdmi/dp audio in the g-c-c

2020-10-12 Thread Yuan-Chen Cheng
Given the details in #11, yes with the new g-c-c, I can see the first profile 
auto-selected.
Without updated g-c-c, it's not auto-selected.

** Tags removed: verification-failed verification-failed-focal
** Tags added: verification-done verification-done-focal

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1896919

Title:
  [SRU] g-c-c: The hdmi/dp profiles are not set automatically in the
  combo list after selecting the hdmi/dp audio in the g-c-c

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/hwe-next/+bug/1896919/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1895449] Re: Internet disconnected unexpectly + Xorg freeze while watching html5 video in Chrome

2020-10-12 Thread koba
if the issue still can be triggered, please also dump the dmesg...
i noticed one alarm.
"No beacon heard and the time event is over already"

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1895449

Title:
  Internet disconnected unexpectly + Xorg freeze while watching html5
  video in Chrome

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1895449/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1895449] Re: Internet disconnected unexpectly + Xorg freeze while watching html5 video in Chrome

2020-10-12 Thread koba
@Mike,
could you help to try the mainline kernel(5.9)!?
https://kernel.ubuntu.com/~kernel-ppa/mainline/v5.9/

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1895449

Title:
  Internet disconnected unexpectly + Xorg freeze while watching html5
  video in Chrome

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1895449/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Re: [Bug 1897515] Re: Ubuntu server 20.04.1 Subiquity running from DVD doesn't see drive 0 as a drive to install to

2020-10-12 Thread Marc Erickson
I'm sorry.  I didn't know that logs were needed for this.


Virus-free.
www.avast.com

<#DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2>

On Mon, Oct 12, 2020 at 8:05 PM Michael Hudson-Doyle <
1897...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote:

> Well OK I guess I understand that much -- but without logs I cannot do
> anything useful.
>
> --
> You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to the bug
> report.
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1897515
>
> Title:
>   Ubuntu server 20.04.1 Subiquity running from DVD doesn't see drive 0
>   as a drive to install to
>
> Status in subiquity:
>   Incomplete
> Status in subiquity package in Ubuntu:
>   New
>
> Bug description:
>   It saw drive 0 but it was listed after the storage drives.  I couldn't
>   install it to drive 0 automatically and don't have enough knowledge
>   and didn't have enough time to configure drive 0 manually as the OS
>   drive.  I had to shut down, disconnect the storage drives, and restart
>   setup.  Doing that finally allowed this cursed installation to
>   complete successfully.
>
>   Dell PowerEdge T310 Service Tag CYC2QM1 - no RAID card installed.
>
> To manage notifications about this bug go to:
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/subiquity/+bug/1897515/+subscriptions
>


-- 
Limit limited liability for corporations
http://marcerickson.blogspot.ca/2015/03/end-limited-liability-for-corporations.html
"...the whole idea of keep everyone afraid, and they'll consume."  -
Marilyn Manson
"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public
relations, for nature cannot be fooled." - Richard Feynman
"Opinion is free but facts are sacred." - C. P. Scott via Stephen Rees

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1897515

Title:
  Ubuntu server 20.04.1 Subiquity running from DVD doesn't see drive 0
  as a drive to install to

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/subiquity/+bug/1897515/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1899184] Re: CPU spikes and system hangs from gnome-shell every 5-10 seconds

2020-10-12 Thread Daniel van Vugt
If anyone else experiences similar issues they should open a new bug.


** Changed in: gnome-shell (Ubuntu)
   Status: Incomplete => Won't Fix

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1899184

Title:
  CPU spikes and system hangs from gnome-shell every 5-10 seconds

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-shell/+bug/1899184/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1897515] Re: Ubuntu server 20.04.1 Subiquity running from DVD doesn't see drive 0 as a drive to install to

2020-10-12 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
Well OK I guess I understand that much -- but without logs I cannot do
anything useful.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1897515

Title:
  Ubuntu server 20.04.1 Subiquity running from DVD doesn't see drive 0
  as a drive to install to

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/subiquity/+bug/1897515/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1899553] [NEW] gcvt and qgcvt do not always provide requested precsion

2020-10-12 Thread Robert Gilmour
Public bug reported:

On Ubuntu 20.04.1 LTS, glibc-2.31:
gcvt() will output no more than 17 digits of precision.
qgcvt() will output no more than 21 digits of precision.

Here is the demo :

//
#include 
#include 

int main(void) {
 char ebuf[80];

 gcvt(0.1, 55, ebuf);
 printf("%s\n", ebuf);

 qgcvt(0.1L, 67, ebuf);
 printf("%s\n", ebuf);

 return 0;
}

//

I got:
0.10001
0.10001

I expected:
0.155511151231257827021181583404541015625
0.100013552527156068805425093160010874271392822265625

The "expected" values are exact base 10 representations of the values
contained in the double 0.1, and in the (80-bit extended precision) long
double 0.1.

The same problem existed on Ubuntu-18.04. I expect it is a longstanding
issue

Cheers,
Rob

** Affects: glibc (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1899553

Title:
  gcvt and qgcvt do not always provide requested precsion

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/glibc/+bug/1899553/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1889342] Re: Thunderbolt Dock Loses Monitors

2020-10-12 Thread rhpot1991
Happened out of the box from Dell, switching to 5.6 OEM didn't help.  I
think part of the key here is the double monitor in the dock with the
laptop screen closed.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1889342

Title:
  Thunderbolt Dock Loses Monitors

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1889342/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1899184] Re: CPU spikes and system hangs from gnome-shell every 5-10 seconds

2020-10-12 Thread Radon Rosborough
No extensions were installed aside from whatever came with Ubuntu by
default. Unfortunately, I can't provide the requested debugging
information at present since I've installed Kubuntu, which does not
exhibit the same problem. Hopefully somebody else with the same issue
can chime in, however.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1899184

Title:
  CPU spikes and system hangs from gnome-shell every 5-10 seconds

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-shell/+bug/1899184/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1899361] Re: udisk prevent disk from standby, standby timer is broken

2020-10-12 Thread Rocko
Actually, I don't think this bug was ever fixed. IIRC we suggested
putting in a configurable time for checking the SMART mon status but the
gnome dev said that the bug was due to buggy hard drive firmware and so
he wasn't going to do anything about it. It's a pain because each time
udisks2 is updated I have to edit the source to make the check time
longer and then rebuild and re-install it on each of my machines. It
seems the "buggy" firmware is quite common in WD drives.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1899361

Title:
  udisk prevent disk from standby, standby timer is broken

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/udisks/+bug/1899361/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1899508] Re: alsa/hda/realtek - The front Mic on a HP machine doesn't work

2020-10-12 Thread jeremyszu
** Tags added: oem-priority originate-from-1896461 stella

** Changed in: oem-priority
   Status: New => In Progress

** Changed in: oem-priority
 Assignee: (unassigned) => jeremyszu (os369510)

** Changed in: oem-priority
   Importance: Undecided => Critical

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1899508

Title:
  alsa/hda/realtek - The front Mic on a HP machine doesn't work

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/oem-priority/+bug/1899508/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1885757] Re: seccomp_bpf fails on powerpc

2020-10-12 Thread Po-Hsu Lin
** Changed in: ubuntu-kernel-tests
   Status: New => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1885757

Title:
  seccomp_bpf fails on powerpc

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-kernel-tests/+bug/1885757/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1896781] Re: lttng-modules 2.11.2-1ubuntu0.1 ADT test failure with linux 5.4.0-49.53

2020-10-12 Thread Po-Hsu Lin
** Changed in: ubuntu-kernel-tests
   Status: Confirmed => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1896781

Title:
  lttng-modules 2.11.2-1ubuntu0.1 ADT test failure with linux
  5.4.0-49.53

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-kernel-tests/+bug/1896781/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1253512] Re: Bluetooth cannot be turned on/off via Ubuntu settings

2020-10-12 Thread Daniel van Vugt
Thank you for reporting this bug to Ubuntu.
Ubuntu 13.10 (saucy) reached end-of-life on July 17, 2014.

See this document for currently supported Ubuntu releases:
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Releases 

We appreciate that this bug may be old and you might not be interested
in discussing it any more. But if you are then please upgrade to the
latest Ubuntu version and re-test. If you then find the bug is still
present in the newer Ubuntu version, please add a comment here telling
us which new version it is in.


** Changed in: gnome-control-center (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Won't Fix

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1253512

Title:
  Bluetooth cannot be turned on/off via Ubuntu settings

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-control-center/+bug/1253512/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1056947] Re: Cannot turn on bluetooth after turning it off from the indicator

2020-10-12 Thread Daniel van Vugt
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1857787 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1857787

Let's use bug 1857787 now since it's more complete.

** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1857787
   Bluetooth cannot be turned on once turned off

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1056947

Title:
  Cannot turn on bluetooth after turning it off from the indicator

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/elementaryos/+bug/1056947/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1894407] Re: linux-tools: can perf be linked against libbfd, maybe statically?

2020-10-12 Thread Nikhil Benesch
As it turns out Ubuntu *did* used to link perf statically:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/783660

So I really don't understand the objection here.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1894407

Title:
  linux-tools: can perf be linked against libbfd, maybe statically?

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1894407/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1857787] Re: Bluetooth cannot be turned on once turned off

2020-10-12 Thread Daniel van Vugt
** Changed in: gnome-control-center (Ubuntu)
   Status: Incomplete => Confirmed

** Tags removed: eoan
** Tags added: focal

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1857787

Title:
  Bluetooth cannot be turned on once turned off

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-bluetooth/+bug/1857787/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1857787] Re: Bluetooth cannot be turned on once turned off

2020-10-12 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
Status changed to 'Confirmed' because the bug affects multiple users.

** Changed in: gnome-bluetooth (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Confirmed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1857787

Title:
  Bluetooth cannot be turned on once turned off

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-bluetooth/+bug/1857787/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1899527] Re: bluetooth remains off even the switch is on from settings

2020-10-12 Thread Daniel van Vugt
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1857787 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1857787

Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make
Ubuntu better. This particular bug has already been reported and is a
duplicate of bug 1857787, so it is being marked as such. Please look at
the other bug report to see if there is any missing information that you
can provide, or to see if there is a workaround for the bug.
Additionally, any further discussion regarding the bug should occur in
the other report. Feel free to continue to report any other bugs you may
find.


** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1857787
   Bluetooth cannot be turned on once turned off

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1899527

Title:
  bluetooth remains off even the switch is on from settings

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bluez/+bug/1899527/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1248720] Re: Bluetooth ON/OFF button switches OFF automatically

2020-10-12 Thread Daniel van Vugt
Ubuntu 14.04 reached end of standard support in April 2019:

  https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Releases

If you would like to continue with free support then please update to a
newer Ubuntu version and tell us if the problem still occurs.

If you would like to continue with Ubuntu 14.04 then there is a paid
support option detailed at https://www.ubuntu.com/esm


** Changed in: gnome-control-center (Ubuntu)
   Status: Confirmed => Won't Fix

** Changed in: gnome-control-center (Ubuntu Trusty)
   Status: Confirmed => Won't Fix

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1248720

Title:
  Bluetooth ON/OFF button switches OFF automatically

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/hundredpapercuts/+bug/1248720/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1899526] Re: Mouse stopped working

2020-10-12 Thread Daniel van Vugt
By "mouse" do you mean touchpad or an external mouse?

I can see you have a wireless mouse/keyboard combo and the receiver for
that is certainly still connected. Can you please try a wired mouse? Or
any other mouse?

** Package changed: xorg (Ubuntu) => ubuntu

** Changed in: ubuntu
   Status: New => Incomplete

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1899526

Title:
  Mouse stopped working

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/1899526/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1899527] Re: bluetooth remains off even the switch is on from settings

2020-10-12 Thread Daniel van Vugt
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1857787 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1857787

** Also affects: gnome-control-center (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1899527

Title:
  bluetooth remains off even the switch is on from settings

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bluez/+bug/1899527/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1899526] Re: Mouse stopped working

2020-10-12 Thread Daniel van Vugt
Also try putting a fresh battery in the mouse.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1899526

Title:
  Mouse stopped working

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/1899526/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1899509] Re: Settings not applied to external touchpad

2020-10-12 Thread Daniel van Vugt
See also bug 865791, bug 1874528, and maybe others.

** Also affects: gnome-settings-daemon via
   https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-settings-daemon/-/issues/559
   Importance: Unknown
   Status: Unknown

** Also affects: gnome-control-center (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Changed in: gnome-control-center (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided => Low

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1899509

Title:
  Settings not applied to external touchpad

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/gnome-settings-daemon/+bug/1899509/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1894407] Re: linux-tools: can perf be linked against libbfd, maybe statically?

2020-10-12 Thread Nikhil Benesch
I too would very much like to see this fixed. As it stands `perf report`
is unusable on large binaries on Ubuntu.

Seth, I think Jay's arguments are compelling. Do you agree? If I
prepared a patch, would that be helpful?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1894407

Title:
  linux-tools: can perf be linked against libbfd, maybe statically?

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1894407/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Re: [Bug 1897515] Re: Ubuntu server 20.04.1 Subiquity running from DVD doesn't see drive 0 as a drive to install to

2020-10-12 Thread Marc Erickson
No I can't.

What's to understand?  Subiquity doesn't see drive 0 to install to
automatically.  A more experienced person might have gotten by this - I
couldn't.


Virus-free.
www.avast.com

<#DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2>

On Mon, Oct 12, 2020 at 6:50 PM Michael Hudson-Doyle <
1897...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote:

> I'm afraid I don't really understand this report. If you still have
> access to the system can you attach the contents of /var/log from the
> live session to this report?
>
> ** Changed in: subiquity
>Status: New => Incomplete
>
> --
> You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to the bug
> report.
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1897515
>
> Title:
>   Ubuntu server 20.04.1 Subiquity running from DVD doesn't see drive 0
>   as a drive to install to
>
> Status in subiquity:
>   Incomplete
> Status in subiquity package in Ubuntu:
>   New
>
> Bug description:
>   It saw drive 0 but it was listed after the storage drives.  I couldn't
>   install it to drive 0 automatically and don't have enough knowledge
>   and didn't have enough time to configure drive 0 manually as the OS
>   drive.  I had to shut down, disconnect the storage drives, and restart
>   setup.  Doing that finally allowed this cursed installation to
>   complete successfully.
>
>   Dell PowerEdge T310 Service Tag CYC2QM1 - no RAID card installed.
>
> To manage notifications about this bug go to:
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/subiquity/+bug/1897515/+subscriptions
>


-- 
Limit limited liability for corporations
http://marcerickson.blogspot.ca/2015/03/end-limited-liability-for-corporations.html
"...the whole idea of keep everyone afraid, and they'll consume."  -
Marilyn Manson
"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public
relations, for nature cannot be fooled." - Richard Feynman
"Opinion is free but facts are sacred." - C. P. Scott via Stephen Rees

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1897515

Title:
  Ubuntu server 20.04.1 Subiquity running from DVD doesn't see drive 0
  as a drive to install to

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/subiquity/+bug/1897515/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1889342] Re: Thunderbolt Dock Loses Monitors

2020-10-12 Thread koba
yours is the same as mine.
Did you trigger the issue after the fresh installation?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1889342

Title:
  Thunderbolt Dock Loses Monitors

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1889342/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1893818] Re: Several blockprobe errors if trying to install the groovy daily live on LPAR

2020-10-12 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
** Changed in: subiquity
   Status: New => Triaged

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1893818

Title:
  Several blockprobe errors if trying to install the groovy daily live
  on LPAR

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/curtin/+bug/1893818/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1893655] Re: Sony WH-1000XM3 headphones connect but don't appear in the audio devices list

2020-10-12 Thread Daniel van Vugt
** Tags added: groovy

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1893655

Title:
  Sony WH-1000XM3 headphones connect but don't appear in the audio
  devices list

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bluez/+bug/1893655/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1899252] Re: Quick alt-tab doesn't work with multiple monitors

2020-10-12 Thread Daniel van Vugt
** Summary changed:

- quick alt-tab doenst work
+ Quick alt-tab doesn't work with multiple monitors

** Changed in: gnome-shell (Ubuntu)
   Status: Incomplete => New

** Tags added: multimonitor

** Summary changed:

- Quick alt-tab doesn't work with multiple monitors
+ Alt-Tab raises all windows of an app (when using multiple monitors)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1899252

Title:
  Alt-Tab raises all windows of an app (when using multiple monitors)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-shell/+bug/1899252/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1899397] Re: [Lenovo IdeaPad 3 14IIL05] No fan detected

2020-10-12 Thread Daniel van Vugt
Not sure but maybe 60-80 degrees... I personally would only be concerned
about the fan being off if the temperature was in that range.

If an operating system doesn't support fan control then the fan will
always be on maximum. So it being off suggests it is supported.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1899397

Title:
  [Lenovo IdeaPad 3 14IIL05] No fan detected

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1899397/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1891324] Re: Groovy Gorilla GRUB won't install to MBR

2020-10-12 Thread Chris Guiver
Possible duplicate (or related to)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub-installer/+bug/1890978

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1891324

Title:
  Groovy Gorilla GRUB won't install to MBR

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub-installer/+bug/1891324/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1889102] Re: [ubuntu-dock] App grid has too many page dots on right

2020-10-12 Thread Daniel van Vugt
** Also affects: gnome-shell-extension-dashtodock (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Changed in: gnome-shell-extension-dashtodock (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1889102

Title:
  [ubuntu-dock] App grid has too many page dots on right

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-shell/+bug/1889102/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1897515] Re: Ubuntu server 20.04.1 Subiquity running from DVD doesn't see drive 0 as a drive to install to

2020-10-12 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
I'm afraid I don't really understand this report. If you still have
access to the system can you attach the contents of /var/log from the
live session to this report?

** Changed in: subiquity
   Status: New => Incomplete

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1897515

Title:
  Ubuntu server 20.04.1 Subiquity running from DVD doesn't see drive 0
  as a drive to install to

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/subiquity/+bug/1897515/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1890978] Re: Unable to install Xubuntu 20.10 on legacy desktop

2020-10-12 Thread Chris Guiver
Possibly related to https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub-
installer/+bug/1891324

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1890978

Title:
  Unable to install Xubuntu 20.10 on legacy desktop

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub-installer/+bug/1890978/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1893818] Re: Several blockprobe errors if trying to install the groovy daily live on LPAR

2020-10-12 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
Status changed to 'Confirmed' because the bug affects multiple users.

** Changed in: multipath-tools (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Confirmed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1893818

Title:
  Several blockprobe errors if trying to install the groovy daily live
  on LPAR

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/curtin/+bug/1893818/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1897991] Re: xubuntu groovy install - bootloader install failure

2020-10-12 Thread Chris Guiver
Possible duplicates, or related to this are

- https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub-installer/+bug/1898342
- https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub-installer/+bug/1899370

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1897991

Title:
  xubuntu groovy install - bootloader install failure

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/1897991/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1899370] Re: Can not install grub bootloader to /dev/sda

2020-10-12 Thread Chris Guiver
Possible duplicate of
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/1897991

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1899370

Title:
  Can not install grub bootloader to /dev/sda

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub-installer/+bug/1899370/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1898342] Re: Bootloader install failed

2020-10-12 Thread Chris Guiver
Possible duplicate of
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/1897991

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1898342

Title:
  Bootloader install failed

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub-installer/+bug/1898342/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1851263] Re: Ubuntu 18.04.3 LTS bump Glibc 2.27 to the latest stable

2020-10-12 Thread Mohammed Naser
I've verified that at least my issue is resolved by this:

```
docker run -it --rm ubuntu:18.04
apt update
apt install g++ wget
wget https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11382 -O bug23861.c
sed -i 's/do_exit = 0/do_exit(0)/' bug23861.c
g++ bug23861.c -lpthread -o bug23861
for ((x=1;x<100;x++)) ; do echo $x;date;./bug23861 
--prefer-writer-nonrecursive;done
```

The above hands, now if we try to update to the newer proposed version.

```
apt install lsb-release
cat 

[Bug 1899308] Re: failure to boot groovy daily (again)

2020-10-12 Thread Chris Guiver
Thank you @Thomas Schmitt (scdbackup) & @sudodus

Using today's Lubuntu groovy ISO 2020.10.12, I ran
(based on @sudodus' comment #15)
--
#!/bin/bash
  original=groovy-desktop-amd64.iso
  test -f test_mbr.iso && rm test_mbr.iso
  xorriso \
-indev "$original" \
-outdev test_mbr.iso \
-boot_image any replay \
-boot_image any appended_part_as=gpt \
-boot_image any mbr_force_bootable=on
--
to create new 'test_mbr.iso'.  It was written with
`sudo dd if=test_mbr.iso of=/dev/sdb bs=4M oflag=sync

it booted fine on (not impacted by this bug)

hp 8200 elite sff (i5-2400, 8gb, nvidia quadro 600)
dell [optiplex] 755 (c2d-e6850, 5gb, amd/ati radeon rv516/x1300/x1550)
dell [optiplex] 755 (c2d-e8300, 8gb, amd/ati radeon rv610/radeon hd2400 pro/xt)
(it appeared to boot slow on 755-8 or 2nd 755, but subjective)
dell [optiplex] 780 (c2q-q9400, 8gb, amd/ati cedar radeon hd 
5000/6000/7350/8350)

HOWEVER it did NOT boot on

hp dc7700 (c2d-e6320, 5gb, nvidia quadro nvs 290)
hp dc7900 (c2d-e8400, 4gb, intel 4 series integrated i915)

Please feel free to verify what I did & highlight any mistakes. 
(keep instruction dead-simple for me please)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1899308

Title:
  failure to boot groovy daily  (again)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-cdimage/+bug/1899308/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1839592] Re: Open vSwitch (Version 2.9.2) goes into deadlocked state

2020-10-12 Thread Mohammed Naser
So, it turns out that 2.27-3ubuntu1.3 could fix this because of the fact
that not only does it include that patch, but a full rebase to 2.27
branch of upstream glibc, which does include the other fix mentioned
above (I found this out when I tried to rebuild locally and found out
that quilt was complaining of an already built patch).

Upon running the code above on the 2.27-3ubuntu1.2 system, it freezes
but works fine under 2.27-3ubuntu1.3.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1839592

Title:
  Open vSwitch (Version 2.9.2) goes into deadlocked state

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/glibc/+bug/1839592/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1894942] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2020-10-12 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From pa...@de.ibm.com 2020-10-12 21:16 EDT---
(In reply to comment #72)
> Checking SRU compatibility:
>
> #1 Source
> Focal: some (minor) backport noise
> Bionic: the same backport of Focal applies with offsets.
> Xenial: some more nois (tracepoint missing), but still ok
>
> Not as-is, but pretty close - should be ok
>
> #2 Builds
> I have started builds of those in
> https://launchpad.net/~ci-train-ppa-service/+archive/ubuntu/4270
>
> #3 testing
> The builds in the PPA succeeded now.
> I'd ask IBM to verify with their tests to check if they can
> a) trigger the issue on those releases
> and
> b) if the PPA then is fixing for them as expected.

Both focal and xenial look good: the issue can be triggered with an up
to date distro qemu and can not be triggered with the PPA qemu.

I've ran ran into some unrelated issues with bionic, I will try to test
there as well after the impediments are out of the way.

Let me also note, that with xenial I see some recoverable connection
drops (with PPA). Probably a different issue.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1894942

Title:
  [UBUNTU 20.04] Lost virtio host --> guest notifications cause devices
  to cease normal operation

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-z-systems/+bug/1894942/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1899544] Re: rdlock stalls indefinitely on an unlocked pthread rwlock

2020-10-12 Thread Mohammed Naser
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1851263 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1851263

Upon checking, it seems that the latest proposed release actually
includes a full rebase to 2.27 which has the fix.

** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1851263
   Ubuntu 18.04.3 LTS bump Glibc 2.27 to the latest stable

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1899544

Title:
  rdlock stalls indefinitely on an unlocked pthread rwlock

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/glibc/+bug/1899544/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1899546] Re: Missing vgabios-ramfb.bin from seabios

2020-10-12 Thread Luqman
Whoops, wrong package.

** Package changed: trayer (Ubuntu) => seabios (Ubuntu)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1899546

Title:
  Missing vgabios-ramfb.bin from seabios

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/seabios/+bug/1899546/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1899546] [NEW] Missing vgabios-ramfb.bin from seabios

2020-10-12 Thread Luqman
Public bug reported:

It looks like qemu ramfb support was added to seabios in rel-1.12.0 but
the ubuntu package doesn't have it.

➜  ~ ls /usr/share/seabios/vgabios-ramfb.bin
ls: cannot access '/usr/share/seabios/vgabios-ramfb.bin': No such file or 
directory

** Affects: seabios (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1899546

Title:
  Missing vgabios-ramfb.bin from seabios

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/seabios/+bug/1899546/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1850003] Re: /etc/grub.d/10_linux_zfs doesn't skip non-linux zpools

2020-10-12 Thread Kyle Ambroff
I ran into this issue too after setting up dual boot with FreeBSD on my
system. An unattended upgrade wiped out my grub menu since it mistook
the "etc" dataset in the FreeBSD zfs pool as a signal that it contained
an Ubuntu install.

The hack described by Benjamin worked for me, although it definitely
doesn't seem like a very sound solution.

```
ubuntu@ubuntu:~$ diff -u /etc/grub.d/10_linux_zfs /mnt/etc/grub.d/10_linux_zfs
--- /etc/grub.d/10_linux_zfs2020-09-08 10:24:35.0 +
+++ /mnt/etc/grub.d/10_linux_zfs2020-10-13 00:10:59.644606544 +
@@ -383,7 +384,8 @@
 # read machine-id/os-release from /etc
 etc_dir=$(get_system_directory "${dataset}" "etc" "true" "${mntdir}" "")
-if [ -z  "${etc_dir}" ]; then
+# KWA: Temporary hack from 
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub2/+bug/1850003
+if [ -z  "${etc_dir}" ] || [ ! -f "${etc_dir}/os-release" ]; then
 grub_warn "Ignoring ${dataset}"
 mountpoint -q "${mntdir}/etc" && umount "${mntdir}/etc" || true
 umount "${mntdir}"
```

Rather than inspecting the contents of the dataset, it might be better
to just set a property on the dataset tagging it as part of an Ubuntu
install. I'm not sure at the moment whether it's possible to just set
arbitrary custom properties on a dataset.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1850003

Title:
  /etc/grub.d/10_linux_zfs doesn't skip non-linux zpools

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub2/+bug/1850003/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1899545] [NEW] Settings for desktop not available

2020-10-12 Thread Stepheny
Public bug reported:

All 'settings', 'Display settings', 'Change Background' all not
available - nothing happens when clicked on. Please fix this.

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.04
Package: ubuntu-release-upgrader-core 1:20.04.25
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.4.0-48.52-generic 5.4.60
Uname: Linux 5.4.0-48-generic x86_64
ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu27.9
Architecture: amd64
CasperMD5CheckResult: skip
CrashDB: ubuntu
CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME
Date: Tue Oct 13 03:33:50 2020
InstallationDate: Installed on 2019-02-14 (606 days ago)
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 18.04.1 LTS "Bionic Beaver" - Release amd64 (20180725)
PackageArchitecture: all
SourcePackage: ubuntu-release-upgrader
Symptom: release-upgrade
UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to focal on 2020-10-13 (0 days ago)
VarLogDistupgradeXorgFixuplog:
 INFO:root:/usr/bin/do-release-upgrade running
 INFO:root:No xorg.conf, exiting

** Affects: ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug dist-upgrade focal

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1899545

Title:
  Settings for desktop not available

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+bug/1899545/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1899545] Re: Settings for desktop not available

2020-10-12 Thread Stepheny
I also have no option to take a screenshot with cropable edges like in
Ubuntu Bionic Beaver 18.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1899545

Title:
  Settings for desktop not available

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+bug/1899545/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1899544] [NEW] rdlock stalls indefinitely on an unlocked pthread rwlock

2020-10-12 Thread Mohammed Naser
Public bug reported:

I'm reporting this here in order to help track fixing this inside
Ubuntu, 18.04 as its' already been fixed upstream:

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23861

I can confirm that this issue indeed occurs on a Ubuntu 18.04 system
*and* it even occurs with the current proposed version of glibc
(2.27-3ubuntu1.3).  One of the workloads that are frequently crashing by
this are Open vSwitch:

https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openvswitch/+bug/1839592/comments/18

Would it be possible to add this to Ubuntu?  There is already a commit
on the 2.27 branch upstream:

https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=glibc.git;h=f6d0e8c36f02b387d33f2cc58c7cb204f201d92e

Thank you

** Affects: glibc (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

** Description changed:

  I'm reporting this here in order to help track fixing this inside
- Ubuntu, as its' already been fixed upstream:
+ Ubuntu, 18.04 as its' already been fixed upstream:
  
  https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23861
  
  I can confirm that this issue indeed occurs on a Ubuntu 18.04 system
  *and* it even occurs with the current proposed version of glibc
  (2.27-3ubuntu1.3).  One of the workloads that are frequently crashing by
  this are Open vSwitch:
  
  https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openvswitch/+bug/1839592/comments/18
  
  Would it be possible to add this to Ubuntu?  There is already a commit
  on the 2.27 branch upstream:
  
  
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=glibc.git;h=f6d0e8c36f02b387d33f2cc58c7cb204f201d92e
  
  Thank you

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1899544

Title:
  rdlock stalls indefinitely on an unlocked pthread rwlock

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/glibc/+bug/1899544/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1839592] Re: Open vSwitch (Version 2.9.2) goes into deadlocked state

2020-10-12 Thread Mohammed Naser
I have done some extensive research on this and I am able to confirm
that while Bug #1864864 does solve a class of issues, it does not solve
the one affecting Open vSwitch, as it does rely on
PTHREAD_RWLOCK_PREFER_WRITER_NONRECURSIVE_NP:

https://github.com/openvswitch/ovs/blob/0de1b425962db073ebbaa3ddbde445580afda840/lib
/ovs-thread.c#L247-L248

And when running the reproducer here:

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23861

By doing the following:

```
curl https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11382 -o bug23861.c
sed -i 's/do_exit = 0/do_exit(0)/' bug23861.c 
g++ bug23861.c -lpthread -o bug23861
for ((x=1;x<100;x++)) ; do echo $x;date;./bug23861 
--prefer-writer-nonrecursive;done
```

I will add that in my initial tests of doing this inside a small VM with
a Docker container, it did not hang after running for 10-15 minutes, but
it immediately hung on a much more powerful machine.  I will file a bug
to try and get the patch above SRU'd into glibc as well and hopefully
that will be the end of it.

** Bug watch added: Sourceware.org Bugzilla #23861
   https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23861

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1839592

Title:
  Open vSwitch (Version 2.9.2) goes into deadlocked state

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/glibc/+bug/1839592/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1899543] [NEW] UPgrading from 18.04 to 20. upgrade fails saying ppa needs purging. Purge completed via command line or gui, but ppa seems to reappear, and the same error occurs with the upgrade.

2020-10-12 Thread Mredd
Public bug reported:


UPgrading from 18.04 to 20.  upgrade fails saying ppa needs purging.
Purge completed via command line or gui, but ppa seems to reappear, and
the same error occurs with the upgrade.  Impossible to upgrade

"This was likely caused by: 
* Unofficial software packages not provided by Ubuntu 
Please use the tool 'ppa-purge' from the ppa-purge 
package to remove software from a Launchpad PPA and 
try the upgrade again. 

If none of this applies, then please report this bug using the 
command 'ubuntu-bug ubuntu-release-upgrader-core' in a terminal. If 
you want to investigate this yourself the log files in 
'/var/log/dist-upgrade' will contain details about the upgrade. 
Specifically, look at 'main.log' and 'apt.log'. 
"

history | grep add-apt-repository

tells me:

  989  sudo add-apt-repository "deb http://realsense-hw-
public.s3.amazonaws.com/Debian/apt-repo bionic main" -u


Have done: 

sudo ppa-purge -s realsense-hw-public.s3.amazonaws.com ppa:Debian/apt-repo 
sudo ppa-purge -s realsense-hw-public.s3.amazonaws.com ppa:Debian/apt-repo 
xenial
sudo ppa-purge -s realsense-hw-public.s3.amazonaws.com ppa:Debian/apt-repo 
bionic main

and a variety of others.

repos seem to return.

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 18.04
Package: ubuntu-release-upgrader-core 1:18.04.38
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.15.0-1050.57-oem 4.15.18
Uname: Linux 4.15.0-1050-oem x86_64
NonfreeKernelModules: lkp_Ubuntu_4_15_0_1050_57_oem_59 nvidia_modeset nvidia
ApportVersion: 2.20.9-0ubuntu7.18
Architecture: amd64
CrashDB: ubuntu
CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME
Date: Tue Oct 13 09:43:23 2020
DistributionChannelDescriptor:
 # This is the distribution channel descriptor for the OEM CDs
 # For more information see http://wiki.ubuntu.com/DistributionChannelDescriptor
 canonical-oem-somerville-bionic-amd64-20180608-47+whitehaven-mlk+X67
InstallationDate: Installed on 2019-08-06 (433 days ago)
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 18.04 "Bionic" - Build amd64 LIVE Binary 
20180608-09:38
PackageArchitecture: all
SourcePackage: ubuntu-release-upgrader
UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to bionic on 2020-10-12 (0 days ago)
mtime.conffile..etc.update-manager.release-upgrades: 2020-10-13T08:18:58.305753

** Affects: ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug bionic dist-upgrade

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1899543

Title:
  UPgrading from 18.04 to 20.  upgrade fails saying ppa needs purging.
  Purge completed via command line or gui, but ppa seems to reappear,
  and the same error occurs with the upgrade.  Impossible to upgrade

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+bug/1899543/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1899206] Re: Tweaktool Keyboard “Additional Layout Options” not persisting on USB keyboard unplug/reconnect

2020-10-12 Thread Weston Hunter
@Gunnar: as a "volunteer who tries to help", you have been immensely
helpful!!

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1899206

Title:
  Tweaktool Keyboard “Additional Layout Options” not persisting on USB
  keyboard unplug/reconnect

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/mutter/+bug/1899206/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1899206] Re: Tweaktool Keyboard “Additional Layout Options” not persisting on USB keyboard unplug/reconnect

2020-10-12 Thread Gunnar Hjalmarsson
Thanks Weston, that was useful info.

Now let's await input from some desktop engineer. I'm just a volunteer
who tries to help. ;)

** Package changed: gnome-shell (Ubuntu) => mutter (Ubuntu)

** Also affects: mutter via
   https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter/-/issues/1466
   Importance: Unknown
   Status: Unknown

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1899206

Title:
  Tweaktool Keyboard “Additional Layout Options” not persisting on USB
  keyboard unplug/reconnect

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/mutter/+bug/1899206/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1899206] Re: Tweaktool Keyboard “Additional Layout Options” not persisting on USB keyboard unplug/reconnect

2020-10-12 Thread Weston Hunter
@Gunnar: Confirmed! The mutter downgrade fixes it: `sudo apt install
mutter=3.36.1-3ubuntu3 mutter-common=3.36.1-3ubuntu3
libmutter-6-0=3.36.1-3ubuntu3 gir1.2-mutter-6=3.36.1-3ubuntu3`.

Thanks so much!

This looks like the bug was introduced in mutter between 3.36.1-3ubuntu3
and 3.36.6-1ubuntu0.20.04.2.

I posted this observation in the linked mutter bug as well (in case it
might help them narrow things).

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1899206

Title:
  Tweaktool Keyboard “Additional Layout Options” not persisting on USB
  keyboard unplug/reconnect

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-shell/+bug/1899206/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1892673] Re: Segfault on launching yforth

2020-10-12 Thread thorne
I came here to report this, but see it's already been reported. For what
it might be worth, I see it under Userspace on Android as well.

I don't know much about gdb, but on x86_64 I see the below. It looks
like maybe a file is missing? Based on a Google search, I tried
installing glibc-source and tried again but got the same result.

$ gdb yforth core
GNU gdb (Ubuntu 9.2-0ubuntu1~20.04) 9.2
Copyright (C) 2020 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
License GPLv3+: GNU GPL version 3 or later 
This is free software: you are free to change and redistribute it.
There is NO WARRANTY, to the extent permitted by law.
Type "show copying" and "show warranty" for details.
This GDB was configured as "x86_64-linux-gnu".
Type "show configuration" for configuration details.
For bug reporting instructions, please see:
.
Find the GDB manual and other documentation resources online at:
.

For help, type "help".
Type "apropos word" to search for commands related to "word"...
Reading symbols from yforth...
(No debugging symbols found in yforth)
[New LWP 38821]
Core was generated by `yforth'.
Program terminated with signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
#0  longjmp_chk () at 
../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/x86_64/longjmp_chk.S:167
167 ../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/x86_64/longjmp_chk.S: No such file or 
directory.
(gdb)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1892673

Title:
  Segfault on launching yforth

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/yforth/+bug/1892673/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1899414] Re: schroot fails for source chroots with 'std:bad_alloc' on groovy

2020-10-12 Thread Alex Murray
Thanks doko, I can confirm that schroot 1.6.10-11ubuntu1 resolves this
issue for me on groovy.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1899414

Title:
  schroot fails for source chroots with 'std:bad_alloc' on groovy

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/schroot/+bug/1899414/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1899542] [NEW] Upgrade to 20.04 crash with ppa info

2020-10-12 Thread Pavel Severyn
Public bug reported:

I have started online update from 18.04 to 20.04. Distribution upgrade
crash on the same error message "Nelze vypočítat přechod na vyšší verzi"
I try translate this to "Can't count transition to higher version".

I remove all ppa repositories and installed software from this
repositories (handbrake, ansible)

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 18.04
Package: ubuntu-release-upgrader-core 1:18.04.38
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.15.0-118.119-generic 4.15.18
Uname: Linux 4.15.0-118-generic x86_64
ApportVersion: 2.20.9-0ubuntu7.17
Architecture: amd64
CrashDB: ubuntu
CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME
Date: Tue Oct 13 00:48:06 2020
InstallationDate: Installed on 2019-02-02 (618 days ago)
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 18.04 LTS "Bionic Beaver" - Release amd64 (20180426)
PackageArchitecture: all
ProcEnviron:
 TERM=xterm-256color
 PATH=(custom, no user)
 XDG_RUNTIME_DIR=
 LANG=cs_CZ.UTF-8
 SHELL=/bin/bash
SourcePackage: ubuntu-release-upgrader
UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to bionic on 2020-10-12 (0 days ago)
VarLogDistupgradeTermlog:

** Affects: ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug bionic dist-upgrade third-party-packages 
wayland-session

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1899542

Title:
  Upgrade to 20.04 crash with ppa info

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+bug/1899542/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1899487] Re: cloud-init hard codes MTU configuration at initial deploy time

2020-10-12 Thread Ryan Harper
> On the flip side the presence of the MTU key in the OpenStack
> metadata cannot be used as an indicator for intent from either the
> system or the user that the DHCP server should not be providing the
> MTU either.
>
> Looking at the commit that changed the behaviour in OpenStack the
> intent of the original code was to always provide the MTU value in
> the metadata regardless of network type, the fact that it showed as
> `null` was a bug.
>
> Up until 2017 the default for the OpenStack controlled DHCP server
> was to always provide an MTU. In 2017 the ability to control this
> behaviour was removed and from that point onward it always provides
> an MTU.
>
> The user has no way of influencing the contents of the OpenStack
> network metadata, apart from downgrading to a 5 year old version.
>

Before we continue suggesting that cloud-init should somehow guess
what OpenStack meant to do with network configuration it provided to
cloud-init I'd like to make sure we discuss what we're suggesting.

If we can guess that an OpenStack which sent an MTU really didn't
mean for cloud-init to use this MTU because the DHCP server might
also send an MTU, can we not guess that the IP address it sent us
wasn't the correct one and instead we should add .1 to the lowest
octet?

I'm being pendantic here to make a point.  OpenStack is the "Oracle"
here; just like MAAS, or Ec2 or Azure.  The network configuration it
provides to the guest is meant to be taken as it is provided.

If the configuration is sub-optimal should not the cloud itself
resolve this?

Has there been any attempt to ask in OpenStack upstream why the MTU
plumbing/control was removed?  If a specific MTU is needed for a
network in OpenStack, should that not be configured in OpenStack such
that the MTU value is either statically provided in the
network-data.json sent *or* update the DHCP server running on that
network to provide the correct value?


> I don't see an easy way of overriding cloud-inits default behaviour
> by adding additional configuration through vendor data either.

This is correct.  Network-config cannot be part of user-data or
vendor-data; the network needs to be configured prior to cloud-init
fetching/reading this data (which may be URLs to remote cloud-config).

>
> Perhaps adding a cloud-init config stanza for how the OpenStack
> source driver should interpret the presence of MTU in the network
> metadata could be a path to retain compability with anyone relying
> on the current behaviour and at the same time providing a way
> forward for everyone else?
>
> Meanwhile instances are configured to obtain an address dynamically
> but stuck with a static value for MTU forever, and not being able to
> adjust to changes being made to the environment without manual
> intervention to individual instances.

If the network-data.json provided by the metadata service is not
sufficient and you cannot change this service one can provide a
network configuration in a ConfigDrive.


** Changed in: cloud-init
   Status: New => Incomplete

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1899487

Title:
  cloud-init hard codes MTU configuration at initial deploy time

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/cloud-init/+bug/1899487/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1899540] [NEW] grub-install /dev/sda

2020-10-12 Thread Bill
Public bug reported:

While completing a new install of 2010 ubuntu the install failed at
grub-install

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.10
Package: ubiquity 20.10.10
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.8.0-21.22-generic 5.8.13
Uname: Linux 5.8.0-21-generic x86_64
NonfreeKernelModules: zfs zunicode zavl icp zcommon znvpair
ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu49
Architecture: amd64
CasperMD5CheckResult: skip
CasperVersion: 1.452
CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME
Date: Mon Oct 12 17:27:25 2020
InstallCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/casper/vmlinuz file=/cdrom/preseed/ubuntu.seed 
maybe-ubiquity quiet splash ---
LiveMediaBuild: Ubuntu 20.10 "Groovy Gorilla" - Beta amd64 (20201011)
ProcEnviron:
 LANGUAGE=en_CA.UTF-8
 PATH=(custom, no user)
 XDG_RUNTIME_DIR=
 LANG=en_CA.UTF-8
 LC_NUMERIC=C.UTF-8
RebootRequiredPkgs:
 linux-image-5.8.0-22-generic
 linux-base
 linux-image-5.8.0-21-generic
 linux-base
 linux-base
SourcePackage: ubiquity
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

** Affects: ubiquity (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug groovy ubiquity-20.10.10 ubuntu

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1899540

Title:
  grub-install /dev/sda

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/1899540/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1899252] Re: quick alt-tab doenst work

2020-10-12 Thread Juan Carlos
Hello, Ive realized something, this behavior only occurs when I'm using
a second monitor, if I alt tab with only 1 monitor then alt tab works as
intended, but when using a second monitor then all the windows of the
app that are in the second monitor are displayed with Alt+tab. This
wasn't the case with Ubuntu 18.04.

Thanks.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1899252

Title:
  quick alt-tab doenst work

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-shell/+bug/1899252/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1893818] Re: Several blockprobe errors if trying to install the groovy daily live on LPAR

2020-10-12 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
Some aspects of this don't make much sense to me. /dev/sda1 is not
managed by udev, it's created by the kernel / devtmpfs. If it's not
there on the filesystem something really wacky is going on. But it
pretty clearly isn't in the udev database, which is almost as strange...

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1893818

Title:
  Several blockprobe errors if trying to install the groovy daily live
  on LPAR

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/curtin/+bug/1893818/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1877844] Re: data corruption issue in all versions before 1.1.11

2020-10-12 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
** Changed in: borgbackup (Ubuntu Xenial)
   Status: Confirmed => In Progress

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1877844

Title:
  data corruption issue in all versions before 1.1.11

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/borgbackup/+bug/1877844/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1899195] Re: /usr/share/apport/apport:AttributeError:/usr/share/apport/apport@451:parse_arguments:print_usage:_print_message

2020-10-12 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
** Branch linked: lp:~ubuntu-core-dev/ubuntu/groovy/apport/ubuntu

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1899195

Title:
  
/usr/share/apport/apport:AttributeError:/usr/share/apport/apport@451:parse_arguments:print_usage:_print_message

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apport/+bug/1899195/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1887544] Re: upgrade from 18.04 to 20.04 fails to calculate if python-dbg is installed

2020-10-12 Thread Brian Murray
Further verification of the python-dev test case. The following packages
were installed:

bdmurray@clean-bionic-amd64:~$ apt-cache policy python-dev-is-python2
python-dev-is-python2:
  Installed: 2.7.17-4
  Candidate: 2.7.17-4
  Version table:
 *** 2.7.17-4 500
500 http://192.168.10.7/ubuntu focal/universe amd64 Packages
500 http://192.168.10.7/ubuntu focal/universe i386 Packages
100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
bdmurray@clean-bionic-amd64:~$ apt-cache policy python2-dev
python2-dev:
  Installed: 2.7.17-2ubuntu4
  Candidate: 2.7.17-2ubuntu4
  Version table:
 *** 2.7.17-2ubuntu4 500
500 http://192.168.10.7/ubuntu focal/universe amd64 Packages
100 /var/lib/dpkg/status


** Tags removed: verification-needed verification-needed-focal
** Tags added: verification-done verification-done-focal

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1887544

Title:
  upgrade from 18.04 to 20.04 fails to calculate if python-dbg is
  installed

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+bug/1887544/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1887544] Re: upgrade from 18.04 to 20.04 fails to calculate if python-dbg is installed

2020-10-12 Thread Brian Murray
I tested the version of the dist-upgrader from -proposed for the python-
dev version of the test case. After the upgrade python-dev was no longer
installed (although there was the same weiredness about it not being
removed in the log) so I consider this part verified.

bdmurray@clean-bionic-amd64:~$ head -n6 /var/log/dist-upgrade/main.log 
2020-10-12 12:27:26,672 INFO Using config files '['./DistUpgrade.cfg.bionic']'
2020-10-12 12:27:26,672 INFO uname information: 'Linux clean-bionic-amd64 
5.4.0-48-generic #52~18.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Thu Sep 10 12:50:22 UTC 202
0 x86_64'
2020-10-12 12:27:27,169 INFO apt version: '1.6.12ubuntu0.1'
2020-10-12 12:27:27,170 INFO python version: '3.6.9 (default, Jul 17 2020, 
12:50:27) 
[GCC 8.4.0]'
2020-10-12 12:27:27,172 INFO release-upgrader version '20.04.28' started
...
2020-10-12 12:31:43,686 INFO checking for python-dev
2020-10-12 12:31:43,686 INFO installing python-dev-is-python2 because 
python-dev was installed
2020-10-12 12:31:43,686 DEBUG Installing 'python-dev-is-python2' (python-dev 
was installed on the system)
2020-10-12 12:31:43,715 INFO removing python-dev because python-dev-is-python2 
is being installed
2020-10-12 12:31:43,715 DEBUG Removing 'python-dev' (python-dev-is-python2 is 
being installed on the system)
2020-10-12 12:31:43,715 INFO failed to remove python-dev
2020-10-12 12:31:43,715 INFO checking for libpython-dev
2020-10-12 12:31:43,715 INFO removing libpython-dev because None is being 
installed
2020-10-12 12:31:43,715 DEBUG Removing 'libpython-dev' (None is being installed 
on the system)
2020-10-12 12:31:43,715 INFO failed to remove libpython-dev

bdmurray@clean-bionic-amd64:~$ apt-cache policy python-dev
python-dev:
  Installed: (none)
  Candidate: (none)
  Version table:
bdmurray@clean-bionic-amd64:~$ apt-cache policy libpython-dev
libpython-dev:
  Installed: (none)
  Candidate: (none)
  Version table:
bdmurray@clean-bionic-amd64:~$ cat /etc/lsb-release 
DISTRIB_ID=Ubuntu
DISTRIB_RELEASE=20.04
DISTRIB_CODENAME=focal
DISTRIB_DESCRIPTION="Ubuntu 20.04.1 LTS"

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1887544

Title:
  upgrade from 18.04 to 20.04 fails to calculate if python-dbg is
  installed

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+bug/1887544/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1899537] [NEW] grub-instazll /dev/sda

2020-10-12 Thread Bill
Public bug reported:

While doing a complete reinstall of ubuntu 2010 the installer crashed
giving grub-install /dev/sda failed

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.10
Package: ubiquity 20.10.10 [modified: 
lib/partman/automatically_partition/question]
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.8.0-21.22-generic 5.8.13
Uname: Linux 5.8.0-21-generic x86_64
NonfreeKernelModules: zfs zunicode zavl icp zcommon znvpair
ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu49
Architecture: amd64
CasperMD5CheckResult: skip
CasperVersion: 1.452
CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME
Date: Mon Oct 12 16:33:27 2020
InstallCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/casper/vmlinuz file=/cdrom/preseed/ubuntu.seed 
maybe-ubiquity quiet splash ---
LiveMediaBuild: Ubuntu 20.10 "Groovy Gorilla" - Beta amd64 (20201011)
ProcEnviron:
 LANGUAGE=en_CA.UTF-8
 PATH=(custom, no user)
 XDG_RUNTIME_DIR=
 LANG=en_CA.UTF-8
 LC_NUMERIC=C.UTF-8
RebootRequiredPkgs:
 linux-image-5.8.0-21-generic
 linux-base
SourcePackage: ubiquity
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

** Affects: ubiquity (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug groovy ubiquity-20.10.10 ubuntu

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1899537

Title:
  grub-instazll /dev/sda

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/1899537/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1899538] [NEW] Cannnot use printer because of some apparmor access right

2020-10-12 Thread Richard
Public bug reported:

My Epson printer disappeared from the list of registered printers.

I could not assign a suitable driver, even though a relevant package supplied 
by Epson was already installed (under /opt).
It turned out that the logs contained messages like this one:

audit: type=1400 audit(1602529987.370:8039): apparmor="DENIED"
operation="open" profile="/usr/sbin/cupsd" name="/home/_opt/epson-
inkjet-printer-stylus-photo-px810fw-series/ppds/" pid=29169 comm="cups-
driverd" requested_mask="r" denied_mask="r" fsuid=7 ouid=0

As explained in 
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DebuggingPrintingProblems#AppArmor_Protection_of_the_printing_system,
a workaround is to install apparmor-utils and run `aa-complain cupsd'.

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.04
Package: cups 2.3.1-9ubuntu1.1
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.4.0-7642.46~1598628707~20.04~040157c~dev-generic 
5.4.44
Uname: Linux 5.4.0-7642-generic x86_64
ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu27.9
Architecture: amd64
CasperMD5CheckResult: skip
CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME
Date: Mon Oct 12 23:30:38 2020
InstallationDate: Installed on 2020-08-14 (59 days ago)
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 20.04.1 LTS "Focal Fossa" - Release amd64 (20200731)
Lpstat: device for Epson-Stylus-Photo-PX710W: 
dnssd://EPSONF904BC._printer._tcp.local/
MachineType: System76, Inc. Pangolin Performance
Papersize: a4
PpdFiles: Error: command ['fgrep', '-H', '*NickName', 
'/etc/cups/ppd/Epson-Stylus-Photo-PX710W.ppd'] failed with exit code 2: grep: 
/etc/cups/ppd/Epson-Stylus-Photo-PX710W.ppd: Permission denied
ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-5.4.0-7642-generic 
root=UUID=675a1866-9c2b-49b9-a2c5-c131e736d65c ro quiet splash 
acpi_os_name=Linux acpi_osi= vt.handoff=7
SourcePackage: cups
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
dmi.bios.date: 06/25/2012
dmi.bios.vendor: American Megatrends Inc.
dmi.bios.version: 4.6.5
dmi.board.asset.tag: Tag 12345
dmi.board.name: Pangolin Performance
dmi.board.vendor: System76, Inc.
dmi.board.version: panp9
dmi.chassis.asset.tag: No Asset Tag
dmi.chassis.type: 10
dmi.chassis.vendor: No Enclosure
dmi.chassis.version: N/A
dmi.modalias: 
dmi:bvnAmericanMegatrendsInc.:bvr4.6.5:bd06/25/2012:svnSystem76,Inc.:pnPangolinPerformance:pvrpanp9:rvnSystem76,Inc.:rnPangolinPerformance:rvrpanp9:cvnNoEnclosure:ct10:cvrN/A:
dmi.product.family: Not Applicable
dmi.product.name: Pangolin Performance
dmi.product.sku: Not Applicable
dmi.product.version: panp9
dmi.sys.vendor: System76, Inc.

** Affects: cups (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apparmor apport-bug focal

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1899538

Title:
  Cannnot use printer because of some apparmor access right

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cups/+bug/1899538/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1899535] [NEW] os-prober generates incorrect entries for Arch linux

2020-10-12 Thread Carlos Pita
Public bug reported:

You can see a detailed description of this issue in
https://askubuntu.com/questions/628206/how-can-i-boot-into-arch-linux-
using-initramfs-in-ubuntus-grub

The fix suggested there by Naiky is simple and works with a little
modification described in comment https://askubuntu.com/questions/628206
/how-can-i-boot-into-arch-linux-using-initramfs-in-ubuntus-
grub#comment2176155_1144517

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.04
Package: os-prober 1.74ubuntu2
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.4.0-48.52-generic 5.4.60
Uname: Linux 5.4.0-48-generic x86_64
ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu27.9
Architecture: amd64
CasperMD5CheckResult: skip
CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME
Date: Mon Oct 12 18:24:24 2020
InstallationDate: Installed on 2020-04-24 (171 days ago)
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 20.04 LTS "Focal Fossa" - Release amd64 (20200423)
SourcePackage: os-prober
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

** Affects: os-prober (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug focal

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1899535

Title:
  os-prober generates incorrect entries for Arch linux

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/os-prober/+bug/1899535/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1899487] Re: cloud-init hard codes MTU configuration at initial deploy time

2020-10-12 Thread Frode Nordahl
On the flip side the presence of the MTU key in the OpenStack metadata
cannot be used as an indicator for intent from either the system or the
user that the DHCP server should not be providing the MTU either.

Looking at the commit that changed the behaviour in OpenStack the intent
of the original code was to always provide the MTU value in the metadata
regardless of network type, the fact that it showed as `null` was a bug.

Up until 2017 the default for the OpenStack controlled DHCP server was
to always provide an MTU. In 2017 the ability to control this behaviour
was removed and from that point onward it always provides an MTU.

The user has no way of influencing the contents of the OpenStack network
metadata, apart from downgrading to a 5 year old version.

I don't see an easy way of overriding cloud-inits default behaviour by
adding additional configuration through vendor data either.

Perhaps adding a cloud-init config stanza for how the OpenStack source
driver should interpret the presence of MTU in the network metadata
could be a path to retain compability with anyone relying on the current
behaviour and at the same time providing a way forward for everyone
else?

Meanwhile instances are configured to obtain an address dynamically but
stuck with a static value for MTU forever, and not being able to adjust
to changes being made to the environment without manual intervention to
individual instances.

** Changed in: cloud-init
   Status: Incomplete => New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1899487

Title:
  cloud-init hard codes MTU configuration at initial deploy time

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/cloud-init/+bug/1899487/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1899509] Re: Settings not applied to external touchpad

2020-10-12 Thread Brennan Vincent
Done: https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-settings-daemon/-/issues/559

** Bug watch added: gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-settings-daemon/-/issues #559
   https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-settings-daemon/-/issues/559

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1899509

Title:
  Settings not applied to external touchpad

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-settings-daemon/+bug/1899509/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1899370] Re: Can not install grub bootloader to /dev/sda

2020-10-12 Thread ajgreeny
zsync from the "current" to "pending" daily iso and choice of UEFI in
the virt-manager configuration for creating the KVM virtual machine has
now booted successfully.

I do not know if it was the move to the pending iso or to using UEFI
firmware that has made the difference, but it appears that the iso file
now defaults to UEFI when booted directly in KVM, probably also in
VirtualBox but I've not used VirtualBox so not sure about that.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1899370

Title:
  Can not install grub bootloader to /dev/sda

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub-installer/+bug/1899370/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1899195] Re: /usr/share/apport/apport:AttributeError:/usr/share/apport/apport@451:parse_arguments:print_usage:_print_message

2020-10-12 Thread Brian Murray
While you won't get a Traceback with the following test case you will
see apport usage printed:

 $ PYTHONPATH=/home/bdmurray/source-trees/apport/trunk data/apport '8219' '11' 
'0' '1' '8219' '!usr!share!spotify!spotify' '(deleted)'
usage: apport [-h] [-p PID] [-s SIGNAL_NUMBER] [-c CORE_ULIMIT] [-d DUMP_MODE] 
[-P [GLOBAL_PID]]

With the fixed version of apport you'll see no such usage message.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1899195

Title:
  
/usr/share/apport/apport:AttributeError:/usr/share/apport/apport@451:parse_arguments:print_usage:_print_message

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apport/+bug/1899195/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1899195] Re: /usr/share/apport/apport:AttributeError:/usr/share/apport/apport@451:parse_arguments:print_usage:_print_message

2020-10-12 Thread Brian Murray
My patch works by ensuring the apport can handle the number of arguments
being passed such that print_usage() is never called so we won't
Traceback trying to write to a non-existent file.

** Changed in: apport (Ubuntu)
   Status: Confirmed => In Progress

** Changed in: apport (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided => High

** Changed in: apport (Ubuntu)
 Assignee: (unassigned) => Brian Murray (brian-murray)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1899195

Title:
  
/usr/share/apport/apport:AttributeError:/usr/share/apport/apport@451:parse_arguments:print_usage:_print_message

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apport/+bug/1899195/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1871721] Re: Second Monitor on HDMI blank screen/blink screen with Nvidia + Intel & Ubuntu 20.04? (ASUS Laptop)

2020-10-12 Thread Hrvoje Lucic
I started to have same problem when upgraded today to Ubuntu 20.04 LTS on my 
docking station with VGA port. 
HP EliteBook 930p laptop
Samsung SyncMaster 2043"
Port: VGA

"lspci" output: 00:02.1 Display controller: Intel Corporation Mobile 4
Series Chipset Integrated Graphics Controller (rev 07)

It worked on 18.04.1

Occasionaly I managed to get it work with "xrandr" setting mode to
1680x1050.

VGA-1 connected primary 1680x1050+0+0 (normal left inverted right x axis y 
axis) 459mm x 296mm
   1680x1050 59.88*+
   1280x1024 75.0260.02  
   1280x960  60.00  
   1152x864  75.00  
   1024x768  75.0370.0760.00  
   832x624   74.55  
   800x600   72.1975.0060.3256.25  
   640x480   75.0072.8166.6759.94  
   720x400   70.08  
   1680x1050_56.00  55.96  


But when I reboot, again it does not work.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1871721

Title:
  Second Monitor on HDMI blank screen/blink screen with Nvidia + Intel &
  Ubuntu 20.04? (ASUS Laptop)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1871721/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1883898] Re: version 3.20.6 turns off plugin requirement for most printers

2020-10-12 Thread Ubuntu Foundations Team Bug Bot
The attachment "0076-3.20.6-regression-In-models.dat-
take-3.20.5-s-plugin.patch" seems to be a patch.  If it isn't, please
remove the "patch" flag from the attachment, remove the "patch" tag, and
if you are a member of the ~ubuntu-reviewers, unsubscribe the team.

[This is an automated message performed by a Launchpad user owned by
~brian-murray, for any issues please contact him.]

** Tags added: patch

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1883898

Title:
  version 3.20.6 turns off plugin requirement for most printers

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/hplip/+bug/1883898/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1899531] [NEW] package make (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: dpkg-deb --control subprocess returned error exit status 127

2020-10-12 Thread Mara Cosentino
Public bug reported:

the make package fails to install

ProblemType: Package
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.04
Package: make (not installed)
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.4.0-42.46-generic 5.4.44
Uname: Linux 5.4.0-42-generic x86_64
ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu27.4
AptOrdering:
 make:amd64: Install
 NULL: ConfigurePending
Architecture: amd64
CasperMD5CheckResult: skip
Date: Mon Oct 12 16:01:08 2020
DpkgTerminalLog:
 Inconsistency detected by ld.so: ../sysdeps/x86_64/dl-machine.h: 541: 
elf_machine_rela_relative: Assertion `ELFW(R_TYPE) (reloc->r_info) == 
R_X86_64_RELATIVE' failed!
 dpkg: error processing archive 
/var/cache/apt/archives/make_4.2.1-1.2_amd64.deb (--unpack):
  dpkg-deb --control subprocess returned error exit status 127
ErrorMessage: dpkg-deb --control subprocess returned error exit status 127
InstallationDate: Installed on 2020-10-11 (0 days ago)
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 20.04.1 LTS "Focal Fossa" - Release amd64 (20200731)
Python3Details: /usr/bin/python3.8, Python 3.8.2, python3-minimal, 
3.8.2-0ubuntu2
PythonDetails: N/A
RelatedPackageVersions:
 dpkg 1.19.7ubuntu3
 apt  2.0.2ubuntu0.1
SourcePackage: make-dfsg
Title: package make (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: dpkg-deb 
--control subprocess returned error exit status 127
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

** Affects: make-dfsg (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-package focal

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1899531

Title:
  package make (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: dpkg-deb
  --control subprocess returned error exit status 127

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/make-dfsg/+bug/1899531/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1899527] Re: bluetooth remains off even the switch is on from settings

2020-10-12 Thread Ubuntu Foundations Team Bug Bot
** Package changed: ubuntu => bluez (Ubuntu)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1899527

Title:
  bluetooth remains off even the switch is on from settings

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bluez/+bug/1899527/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

  1   2   3   4   5   6   >