date:20220212

[Bug 1955044] Re: [SRU] /usr/include/glibmm-2.4/glibmm/variant.h:956:24: error: expected unqualified-id before ‘)’ token (with GCC 11 in C++20 mode)

2022-02-12 Thread Jeremy Bicha

** Changed in: glibmm2.4 (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Fix Released

** Also affects: glibmm2.4 (Ubuntu Impish)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Changed in: glibmm2.4 (Ubuntu Impish)
   Status: New => Triaged

** Description changed:

- There are compilation errors when I try to include the  header 
under C++20 and run default compiler, GCC 11.
- This is reproducible in Ubuntu 21.10 (Impish Indri) or Ubuntu devel (Jammy 
Jellyfish) but not in Ubuntu 21.04 (Impish Indri) or Debian unstable. And this 
is effecting building of the telegram-desktop package.
+ Impact
+ ==
+ It's not possible to build using the  header under C++20 with the 
default compiler, GCC 11. This is interfering with being able to build 
telegram-desktop.
  
- mymedia@barberry:~$ g++ -x c++ -std=gnu++20 -include glibmm.h - <<< 'int 
main(){}' `pkg-config --cflags --libs glibmm-2.4` -o /dev/null
+ This was fixed for Ubuntu 22.04 LTS with 2.66.1
+ 
+ Demonstration of the Issue
+ ==
+ $ g++ -x c++ -std=gnu++20 -include glibmm.h - <<< 'int main(){}' `pkg-config 
--cflags --libs glibmm-2.4` -o /dev/null
  In file included from 
/usr/include/glibmm-2.4/glibmm/containerhandle_shared.h:23,
   from /usr/include/glibmm-2.4/glibmm/arrayhandle.h:21,
   from /usr/include/glibmm-2.4/glibmm.h:92,
   from :
  /usr/include/glibmm-2.4/glibmm/variant.h:956:24: error: expected 
unqualified-id before ‘)’ token
    956 |   Variant();
    |^
  /usr/include/glibmm-2.4/glibmm/variant.h:1017:25: error: expected 
unqualified-id before ‘)’ token
   1017 |   Variant< Variant >();
    | ^
  /usr/include/glibmm-2.4/glibmm/variant.h:1070:26: error: expected 
unqualified-id before ‘)’ token
   1070 |   Variant();
    |  ^
  /usr/include/glibmm-2.4/glibmm/variant.h:1240:24: error: expected 
unqualified-id before ‘)’ token
   1240 |   Variant();
    |^
  /usr/include/glibmm-2.4/glibmm/variant.h:1286:30: error: expected 
unqualified-id before ‘)’ token
   1286 |   Variant< std::pair >()
    |  ^
  /usr/include/glibmm-2.4/glibmm/variant.h:1335:29: error: expected 
unqualified-id before ‘)’ token
   1335 |   Variant< std::vector >()
    | ^
  /usr/include/glibmm-2.4/glibmm/variant.h:1404:41: error: expected 
unqualified-id before ‘)’ token
   1404 |   Variant< std::vector >();
    | ^
  /usr/include/glibmm-2.4/glibmm/variant.h:1530:39: error: expected 
unqualified-id before ‘)’ token
   1530 |   Variant< std::vector >();
    |   ^
  /usr/include/glibmm-2.4/glibmm/variant.h:1606:29: error: expected 
unqualified-id before ‘)’ token
   1606 |   Variant< std::map >()
    | ^
  /usr/include/glibmm-2.4/glibmm/variant.h:1679:33: error: expected 
unqualified-id before ‘)’ token
   1679 |   Variant>()
    | ^
  In file included from /usr/include/glibmm-2.4/glibmm/variant.h:1742,
   from 
/usr/include/glibmm-2.4/glibmm/containerhandle_shared.h:23,
   from /usr/include/glibmm-2.4/glibmm/arrayhandle.h:21,
   from /usr/include/glibmm-2.4/glibmm.h:92,
   from :
  /usr/include/glibmm-2.4/glibmm/variant_basictypes.h:23:17: error: expected 
unqualified-id before ‘)’ token
     23 |   Variant()
    | ^
  /usr/include/glibmm-2.4/glibmm/variant_basictypes.h:66:26: error: expected 
unqualified-id before ‘)’ token
     66 |   Variant()
    |  ^
  /usr/include/glibmm-2.4/glibmm/variant_basictypes.h:109:19: error: expected 
unqualified-id before ‘)’ token
    109 |   Variant()
    |   ^
  /usr/include/glibmm-2.4/glibmm/variant_basictypes.h:152:20: error: expected 
unqualified-id before ‘)’ token
    152 |   Variant()
    |^
  /usr/include/glibmm-2.4/glibmm/variant_basictypes.h:195:19: error: expected 
unqualified-id before ‘)’ token
    195 |   Variant()
    |   ^
  /usr/include/glibmm-2.4/glibmm/variant_basictypes.h:244:20: error: expected 
unqualified-id before ‘)’ token
    244 |   Variant()
    |^
  /usr/include/glibmm-2.4/glibmm/variant_basictypes.h:287:19: error: expected 
unqualified-id before ‘)’ token
    287 |   Variant()
    |   ^
  /usr/include/glibmm-2.4/glibmm/variant_basictypes.h:330:20: error: expected 
unqualified-id before ‘)’ token
    330 |   Variant()
    |^
  /usr/include/glibmm-2.4/glibmm/variant_basictypes.h:373:19: error: expected 
unqualified-id before ‘)’ token
    373 |   Variant()
    |   ^
  In file included from 
/usr/include/glibmm-2.4/glibmm/containerhandle_shared.h:23,

[Bug 1960730] Re: calamares focal install to sony vaio - failure to boot

2022-02-12 Thread Leó Kolbeinsson

Also tested daily Focal.4 12-02-2022 on two boxes with UEFI+secure boot
enabled and no errors encountered and unable to reproduce the failure -
boxes tested were:

1. Lenovo V14IIL
2. Dell latitude 7280

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1960730

Title:
  calamares focal install to sony vaio - failure to boot

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/calamares/+bug/1960730/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1960582] Re: [critical] dpkg error while processing - can't install nor upgrade

2022-02-12 Thread Duong Phan

** Changed in: dpkg (Ubuntu)
   Status: Invalid => New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1960582

Title:
  [critical] dpkg error while processing - can't install nor upgrade

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dpkg/+bug/1960582/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1960730] Re: calamares focal install to sony vaio - failure to boot

2022-02-12 Thread Chris Guiver

install attempt #3 in comment #3 failed like others

SECURE BOOT FAILED
Your VAIO has detected an invalid operating system.
The following option(s) may resolve this error

- RESTART
- Start BIOS setup
- Start troubleshooting (recovery)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1960730

Title:
  calamares focal install to sony vaio - failure to boot

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/calamares/+bug/1960730/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1960730] Re: calamares focal install to sony vaio - failure to boot

2022-02-12 Thread Chris Guiver

repeated install attempt using

`sudo -E calamares -d`

(my intention anyway; not a fan of this device)

** Description changed:

  QA-test install of Lubuntu focal.4 daily on
- - sony vaio 
+ - sony vaio svp112a1cw (i5-9400u, 4gb, intel haswell-ULT)
+ testcase: full disk, encryption, internet, uEFI
  
- normal install until reboot; then instead of system booting i got
+ NOTE:   I didn't check SECURE-uEFI setting on device; so it was
+ incorrectly set to SECURE
  
- "SECURE BOOT FAILED.  Your VAIO has detected an invalid operating
- system." and various options such as go into BIOS/uEFI settings, reboot
- etc...
+ ** expected result
  
- This is a subsequent repeat of that install; same params .. with
- attempted first boot not yet attempted (`ubuntu-bug calamares` RAN
- FIRST, so should be roughly the same but if the box boots when I shortly
- re-try boot, the detail in this report may NOT match the issue)
+ on reboot perform checks & record successful test (hopefully realize I
+ had SECURE setting wrong too!)
  
- NOTE:  My intention was not SECURE-uEFI but I must have failed to switch
- Secure-boot OFF.. no changes here; and my last install to this box was
- in the current Secure setting (successful; date will be found on Lubuntu
- QA testing checklist)
+ ** actual result
+ 
+ on reboot
+ 
+ "SECURE BOOT FAILED ; your VAIO has detected an invalid operating
+ system"
+ 
+ and various options such as go into BIOS/uEFI settings, reboot etc...
+ 
+ 
+ 
+ The installed was re-attempted; same conditions however this time I ran
+ `ubuntu-bug calamares` before reboot.  This second attempt resulted in
+ identical failure.
+ 
+ NOTE:  My intention was NOT SECURE-uEFI but I must have failed to switch
+ Secure-boot OFF.. I think the last install attempted was Ubuntu ISO
+ (exploration of bug 1960226) but it was a successful install (alas with
+ the wrong ISO thus why install worked)
  
  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.04
  Package: calamares 3.2.20-0ubuntu1
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.13.0-30.33~20.04.1-generic 5.13.19
  Uname: Linux 5.13.0-30-generic x86_64
  .etc.calamares.modules.finished.conf:
-  ---
-  restartNowMode: user-checked
-  restartNowCommand: "systemctl -i reboot"
+  ---
+  restartNowMode: user-checked
+  restartNowCommand: "systemctl -i reboot"
  .etc.calamares.modules.partition.conf:
-  efiSystemPartition: "/boot/efi"
-  enableLuksAutomatedPartitioning: true
-  userSwapChoices: none
-  drawNestedPartitions: true
-  defaultFileSystemType: "ext4"
+  efiSystemPartition: "/boot/efi"
+  enableLuksAutomatedPartitioning: true
+  userSwapChoices: none
+  drawNestedPartitions: true
+  defaultFileSystemType: "ext4"
  .etc.calamares.modules.shellprocess_logs.conf:
-  ---
-  dontChroot: true
-  timeout: 30
-  script:
-  - calamares-logs-helper @@ROOT@@
+  ---
+  dontChroot: true
+  timeout: 30
+  script:
+  - calamares-logs-helper @@ROOT@@
  .etc.calamares.modules.unpackfs.conf:
-  ---
-  unpack:
-  -   source: "/cdrom/casper/filesystem.squashfs"
-  sourcefs: "squashfs"
-  destination: ""
+  ---
+  unpack:
+  -   source: "/cdrom/casper/filesystem.squashfs"
+  sourcefs: "squashfs"
+  destination: ""
  ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu27.21
  Architecture: amd64
  CasperMD5CheckResult: pass
  CasperVersion: 1.445.1
  CurrentDesktop: LXQt
  Date: Sun Feb 13 14:49:30 2022
  LiveMediaBuild: Lubuntu 20.04.4 LTS "Focal Fossa" - Release amd64 (20220212)
  RelatedPackageVersions:
-  calamares-settings-ubuntu-common 1:20.04.2.1
-  calamares-settings-lubuntu   1:20.04.2.1
-  xfsprogs 5.3.0-1ubuntu2
-  btrfs-progs  5.4.1-2
+  calamares-settings-ubuntu-common 1:20.04.2.1
+  calamares-settings-lubuntu   1:20.04.2.1
+  xfsprogs 5.3.0-1ubuntu2
+  btrfs-progs  5.4.1-2
  SourcePackage: calamares
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

** Attachment added: "~/.cache/calamares/session.log"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/calamares/+bug/1960730/+attachment/5560621/+files/session.log

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1960730

Title:
  calamares focal install to sony vaio - failure to boot

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/calamares/+bug/1960730/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1318406] Re: SystemSettings doesn't enable nouveau but says it does

2022-02-12 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker

[Expired for Ubuntu because there has been no activity for 60 days.]

** Changed in: ubuntu
   Status: Incomplete => Expired

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1318406

Title:
  SystemSettings doesn't enable nouveau but says it does

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/1318406/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1480286] Re: formatting easily usb devices like usb keys

2022-02-12 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker

[Expired for Ubuntu because there has been no activity for 60 days.]

** Changed in: ubuntu
   Status: Incomplete => Expired

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1480286

Title:
  formatting easily usb devices like usb keys

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/1480286/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1627187] Re: touchpad is not recognized. no two finger scrolling or zoom

2022-02-12 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker

[Expired for Ubuntu because there has been no activity for 60 days.]

** Changed in: ubuntu
   Status: Incomplete => Expired

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1627187

Title:
  touchpad is not recognized. no two finger scrolling or zoom

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/1627187/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1633081] Re: [Touchpad] Mouse moves, but clicks and scrolls not detected

2022-02-12 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker

[Expired for Ubuntu because there has been no activity for 60 days.]

** Changed in: ubuntu
   Status: Incomplete => Expired

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1633081

Title:
  [Touchpad] Mouse moves, but clicks and scrolls not detected

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/1633081/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1643946] Re: Ubuntu 4.14 kernel 4.2.0-42 after update does not detect projector via VGA

2022-02-12 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker

[Expired for Ubuntu because there has been no activity for 60 days.]

** Changed in: ubuntu
   Status: Incomplete => Expired

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1643946

Title:
  Ubuntu 4.14 kernel 4.2.0-42 after update does not detect projector via
  VGA

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/1643946/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1741780] Re: No response from touchpad

2022-02-12 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker

[Expired for Ubuntu because there has been no activity for 60 days.]

** Changed in: ubuntu
   Status: Incomplete => Expired

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1741780

Title:
  No response from touchpad

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/1741780/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1653540] Re: Using Processor microcode firmware for intel CPUs from intel-microcode(proprietary)

2022-02-12 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker

[Expired for Ubuntu because there has been no activity for 60 days.]

** Changed in: ubuntu
   Status: Incomplete => Expired

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1653540

Title:
  Using Processor microcode firmware for intel CPUs from intel-
  microcode(proprietary)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/1653540/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1743097] Re: keyboard/mouse dont work after update

2022-02-12 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker

[Expired for Ubuntu because there has been no activity for 60 days.]

** Changed in: ubuntu
   Status: Incomplete => Expired

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1743097

Title:
  keyboard/mouse dont work after update

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/1743097/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1654627] Re: Windows Rearrange and Resize without User Interactions

2022-02-12 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker

[Expired for Ubuntu because there has been no activity for 60 days.]

** Changed in: ubuntu
   Status: Incomplete => Expired

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1654627

Title:
  Windows Rearrange and Resize without User Interactions

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/1654627/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1755853] Re: OpenDKIM service crashes before sign email

2022-02-12 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker

[Expired for opendkim (Ubuntu) because there has been no activity for 60
days.]

** Changed in: opendkim (Ubuntu)
   Status: Incomplete => Expired

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1755853

Title:
  OpenDKIM service crashes before sign email

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/opendkim/+bug/1755853/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1875744] Re: xdg-user-dir does for root does not return the locale names of the directories

2022-02-12 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker

[Expired for xdg-user-dirs (Ubuntu) because there has been no activity
for 60 days.]

** Changed in: xdg-user-dirs (Ubuntu)
   Status: Incomplete => Expired

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1875744

Title:
  xdg-user-dir does for root does not return the locale names of the
  directories

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xdg-user-dirs/+bug/1875744/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1954542] Re: package ubuntu-advantage-tools 27.4.2~21.10.1 failed to install/upgrade: installed ubuntu-advantage-tools package post-installation script subprocess returned error exit status 1

2022-02-12 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker

[Expired for ubuntu-advantage-tools (Ubuntu) because there has been no
activity for 60 days.]

** Changed in: ubuntu-advantage-tools (Ubuntu)
   Status: Incomplete => Expired

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1954542

Title:
  package ubuntu-advantage-tools 27.4.2~21.10.1 failed to
  install/upgrade: installed ubuntu-advantage-tools package post-
  installation script subprocess returned error exit status 1

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/+bug/1954542/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1954569] Re: unable to open/start the transmission app

2022-02-12 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker

[Expired for transmission (Ubuntu) because there has been no activity
for 60 days.]

** Changed in: transmission (Ubuntu)
   Status: Incomplete => Expired

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1954569

Title:
  unable to open/start the transmission app

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/transmission/+bug/1954569/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1960722] Re: ubiquity-zsys crashes when ZFS-encryption is chosen

2022-02-12 Thread Thomas Boerner

*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1960717 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1960717

** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1960717
   zsys-setup fails when ZFS-encryption chosen

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1960722

Title:
  ubiquity-zsys crashes when ZFS-encryption is chosen

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/1960722/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1960717] Re: zsys-setup fails when ZFS-encryption chosen

2022-02-12 Thread Thomas Boerner

** Summary changed:

- zsys-setup fails on nvme drive. 
+ zsys-setup fails when ZFS-encryption chosen

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1960717

Title:
  zsys-setup fails when ZFS-encryption chosen

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/1960717/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1960722] Re: ubiquity-zsys crashes when ZFS-encryption is chosen

2022-02-12 Thread Thomas Boerner

** Summary changed:

- ubiquity-zsys crashes on Thinkpad E15 Gen2
+ ubiquity-zsys crashes when ZFS-encryption is chosen

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1960722

Title:
  ubiquity-zsys crashes when ZFS-encryption is chosen

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/1960722/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1485325] Re: Progress bar for do-release-upgrade

2022-02-12 Thread Paul Schreiber

+1

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1485325

Title:
  Progress bar for do-release-upgrade

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/update-manager-core/+bug/1485325/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1960730] Re: calamares focal install to sony vaio - failure to boot

2022-02-12 Thread Ubuntu QA Website

This bug has been reported on the Ubuntu ISO testing tracker.

A list of all reports related to this bug can be found here:
http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/reports/bugs/1960730

** Tags added: iso-testing

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1960730

Title:
  calamares focal install to sony vaio - failure to boot

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/calamares/+bug/1960730/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1960730] [NEW] calamares focal install to sony vaio - failure to boot

2022-02-12 Thread Chris Guiver

Public bug reported:

QA-test install of Lubuntu focal.4 daily on
- sony vaio 

normal install until reboot; then instead of system booting i got

"SECURE BOOT FAILED.  Your VAIO has detected an invalid operating
system." and various options such as go into BIOS/uEFI settings, reboot
etc...

This is a subsequent repeat of that install; same params .. with
attempted first boot not yet attempted (`ubuntu-bug calamares` RAN
FIRST, so should be roughly the same but if the box boots when I shortly
re-try boot, the detail in this report may NOT match the issue)

NOTE:  My intention was not SECURE-uEFI but I must have failed to switch
Secure-boot OFF.. no changes here; and my last install to this box was
in the current Secure setting (successful; date will be found on Lubuntu
QA testing checklist)

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.04
Package: calamares 3.2.20-0ubuntu1
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.13.0-30.33~20.04.1-generic 5.13.19
Uname: Linux 5.13.0-30-generic x86_64
.etc.calamares.modules.finished.conf:
 ---
 restartNowMode: user-checked
 restartNowCommand: "systemctl -i reboot"
.etc.calamares.modules.partition.conf:
 efiSystemPartition: "/boot/efi"
 enableLuksAutomatedPartitioning: true
 userSwapChoices: none
 drawNestedPartitions: true
 defaultFileSystemType: "ext4"
.etc.calamares.modules.shellprocess_logs.conf:
 ---
 dontChroot: true
 timeout: 30
 script:
 - calamares-logs-helper @@ROOT@@
.etc.calamares.modules.unpackfs.conf:
 ---
 unpack:
 -   source: "/cdrom/casper/filesystem.squashfs"
 sourcefs: "squashfs"
 destination: ""
ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu27.21
Architecture: amd64
CasperMD5CheckResult: pass
CasperVersion: 1.445.1
CurrentDesktop: LXQt
Date: Sun Feb 13 14:49:30 2022
LiveMediaBuild: Lubuntu 20.04.4 LTS "Focal Fossa" - Release amd64 (20220212)
RelatedPackageVersions:
 calamares-settings-ubuntu-common 1:20.04.2.1
 calamares-settings-lubuntu   1:20.04.2.1
 xfsprogs 5.3.0-1ubuntu2
 btrfs-progs  5.4.1-2
SourcePackage: calamares
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

** Affects: calamares (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug focal iso-testing

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1960730

Title:
  calamares focal install to sony vaio - failure to boot

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/calamares/+bug/1960730/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1960729] Missing required logs.

2022-02-12 Thread Ubuntu Kernel Bot

This bug is missing log files that will aid in diagnosing the problem.
While running an Ubuntu kernel (not a mainline or third-party kernel)
please enter the following command in a terminal window:

apport-collect 1960729

and then change the status of the bug to 'Confirmed'.

If, due to the nature of the issue you have encountered, you are unable
to run this command, please add a comment stating that fact and change
the bug status to 'Confirmed'.

This change has been made by an automated script, maintained by the
Ubuntu Kernel Team.

** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Incomplete

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1960729

Title:
  Thinkpad T14 gen2 AMD - spontaneous reboot

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1960729/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1960729] [NEW] Thinkpad T14 gen2 AMD - spontaneous reboot

2022-02-12 Thread Peter Matulis

Public bug reported:

After my Thinkpad T14 gen2 AMD spontaneously rebooted I found this in
the kernel log:

[6.211553] 
===
[6.211556] UBSAN: invalid-load in 
/build/linux-PqLDBN/linux-5.15.15/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm.c:5882:84
[6.211558] load of value 187 is not a valid value for type '_Bool'
[6.211560] CPU: 2 PID: 414 Comm: plymouthd Tainted: G   OE 
5.15.15-76051515-generic #202201160435~1642693824~21.10~97db1bb
[6.211561] Hardware name: LENOVO 20XKCTO1WW/20XKCTO1WW, BIOS R1MET43W (1.13 
) 11/05/2021
[6.211562] Call Trace:
[6.211563]  
[6.211565]  show_stack+0x52/0x58
[6.211569]  dump_stack_lvl+0x4a/0x5f
[6.211573]  dump_stack+0x10/0x12
[6.211574]  ubsan_epilogue+0x9/0x45
[6.211575]  __ubsan_handle_load_invalid_value.cold+0x44/0x49
[6.211577]  create_stream_for_sink.cold+0x5d/0xbb [amdgpu]
[6.211697]  ? __free_pages_ok+0x31b/0x470
[6.211699]  create_validate_stream_for_sink+0x59/0x150 [amdgpu]
[6.211802]  dm_update_crtc_state+0x235/0x7b0 [amdgpu]
[6.211894]  amdgpu_dm_atomic_check+0x596/0xcd0 [amdgpu]
[6.211983]  ? dm_plane_format_mod_supported+0x1f/0x100 [amdgpu]
[6.212069]  ? drm_plane_check_pixel_format+0x45/0x90 [drm]
[6.212084]  ? drm_atomic_plane_check+0x12f/0x360 [drm]
[6.212095]  drm_atomic_check_only+0x253/0x4b0 [drm]
[6.212103]  ? handle_conflicting_encoders+0x26b/0x2a0 [drm_kms_helper]
[6.212113]  drm_atomic_commit+0x18/0x50 [drm]
[6.212122]  drm_atomic_helper_set_config+0x7c/0xc0 [drm_kms_helper]
[6.212128]  drm_mode_setcrtc+0x1f9/0x7c0 [drm]
[6.212137]  ? drm_mode_getcrtc+0x1c0/0x1c0 [drm]
[6.212146]  drm_ioctl_kernel+0xae/0xf0 [drm]
[6.212155]  drm_ioctl+0x264/0x4b0 [drm]
[6.212163]  ? drm_mode_getcrtc+0x1c0/0x1c0 [drm]
[6.212172]  amdgpu_drm_ioctl+0x4e/0x80 [amdgpu]
[6.212231]  __x64_sys_ioctl+0x91/0xc0
[6.212234]  do_syscall_64+0x5c/0xc0
[6.212235]  ? amdgpu_drm_ioctl+0x6f/0x80 [amdgpu]
[6.212294]  ? exit_to_user_mode_prepare+0x37/0xb0
[6.212296]  ? syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0x27/0x50
[6.212298]  ? do_syscall_64+0x69/0xc0
[6.212299]  ? exit_to_user_mode_prepare+0x37/0xb0
[6.212300]  ? irqentry_exit_to_user_mode+0x9/0x20
[6.212301]  ? irqentry_exit+0x19/0x30
[6.212302]  ? exc_page_fault+0x89/0x160
[6.212303]  ? asm_exc_page_fault+0x8/0x30
[6.212305]  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae
[6.212306] RIP: 0033:0x7fc4c316a9cb
[6.212308] Code: ff ff ff 85 c0 79 8b 49 c7 c4 ff ff ff ff 5b 5d 4c 89 e0 
41 5c c3 66 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 f3 0f 1e fa b8 10 00 00 00 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 
f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 8b 0d 35 a4 0f 00 f7 d8 64 89 01 4
8
[6.212309] RSP: 002b:7b5d2fb8 EFLAGS: 0246 ORIG_RAX: 
0010
[6.212310] RAX: ffda RBX: 7b5d2ff0 RCX: 7fc4c316a9cb
[6.212311] RDX: 7b5d2ff0 RSI: c06864a2 RDI: 0009
[6.212312] RBP: c06864a2 R08:  R09: 5566798141f0
[6.212312] R10:  R11: 0246 R12: 0067
[6.212313] R13: 0009 R14: 556679814140 R15: 556679814180
[6.212314]  
[6.212314] 
===
--- 
ProblemType: Bug
ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu71
Architecture: amd64
CasperMD5CheckResult: unknown
CurrentDesktop: pop:GNOME
DistroRelease: Pop!_OS 21.10
Package: linux (not installed)
ProcEnviron:
 TERM=tmux-256color
 PATH=(custom, no user)
 XDG_RUNTIME_DIR=
 LANG=en_US.UTF-8
 SHELL=/bin/zsh
Tags:  impish
Uname: Linux 5.15.15-76051515-generic x86_64
UnreportableReason: The running kernel is not an Ubuntu kernel
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
UserGroups: adm lpadmin sudo
_MarkForUpload: True

** Affects: linux (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: apport-collected impish

** Tags added: apport-collected impish

** Description changed:

  After my Thinkpad T14 gen2 AMD spontaneously rebooted I found this in
  the kernel log:
  
  [6.211553] 
===
  [6.211556] UBSAN: invalid-load in 
/build/linux-PqLDBN/linux-5.15.15/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm.c:5882:84
  [6.211558] load of value 187 is not a valid value for type '_Bool'
  [6.211560] CPU: 2 PID: 414 Comm: plymouthd Tainted: G   OE 
5.15.15-76051515-generic #202201160435~1642693824~21.10~97db1bb
  [6.211561] Hardware name: LENOVO 20XKCTO1WW/20XKCTO1WW, BIOS R1MET43W 
(1.13 ) 11/05/2021
  [6.211562] Call Trace:
  [6.211563]  
  [6.211565]  show_stack+0x52/0x58
  [6.211569]  dump_stack_lvl+0x4a/0x5f
  [6.211573]  dump_stack+0x10/0x12
  [6.211574]  ubsan_epilogue+0x9/0x45
  [6.211575]

[Bug 1960729] ProcCpuinfoMinimal.txt

2022-02-12 Thread Peter Matulis

apport information

** Attachment added: "ProcCpuinfoMinimal.txt"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1960729/+attachment/5560602/+files/ProcCpuinfoMinimal.txt

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1960729

Title:
  Thinkpad T14 gen2 AMD - spontaneous reboot

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1960729/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1958019]

2022-02-12 Thread info

(In reply to darnellkeithj from comment #375)
> Thought i'd reinstall linux to see if there were any changes with this Yoga
> Duet 7i. Still no sound with the newer kernels but 5.4.88-1-lts with Arch
> "Arco"linux does works every time. Microphone does not work. Why it works in
> 5.488-1-lts and not newer is beyond me. Why devs haven't compared the two
> and fixed it is also puzzling.

Hi all,

New Lenovo Yoga Duet 7 13IML05 (2020) user here. The Duet 7 is a really
nice, light and compact 13-inch tablet, ideal for triple-booting
Windows, Linux and macOS. The only issue currently with this device is
getting the ALC287 sound chip to work in Linux and macOS.

I confirm darnellkeithj's findings that the sound output (speakers and
headphones) works out of the box with the Arch kernel up to and
including 5.4.88-1-lts. I'm actually using Manjaro Linux for testing,
which allows installing several kernels and switching easily between
them. Older Arch kernels may be downloaded from the Arch Linux Archive
at https://archive.archlinux.org/packages/l/linux-lts/ and
https://archive.archlinux.org/packages/l/linux/.

Kernel 5.4.89 breaks sound output on the Yoga Duet 7 because of the following
commit:
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git/diff/releases/5.4.89/alsa-hda-realtek-fix-speaker-volume-control-on-lenovo-c940.patch?id=1889f9ac9f9eb7f91ffc22e607a2e3db3db2e72e
For some odd reason, the Lenovo Yoga C940 seems to be using the same audio
subsystem ID 0x17aa, 0x3818 as the Yoga Duet 7, so any quirk applied to the
C940 will apply to the Duet 7 as well, even if it is not required. Reverting
this commit fixes the sound output for kernels up to and including
5.4.98-1-lts. Kernels 5.x break sound output again, even with this commit
reverted... So this is not an optimal approach.

However, I found an easy way for fixing the sound output (speakers and
headphones) on the Yoga Duet 7. The cool thing is that it doesn't require
compiling a custom kernel. Sadly, the fix works only for kernels up to and
including 5.10.1.
Simply disable the snd-sof-pci driver and force the use of the legacy
snd-hda-intel driver by adding the following two lines to
/etc/modprobe.d/alsa-base.conf
"blacklist snd-sof-pci"
"options snd-intel-dspcfg dsp_driver=1"

With both solutions, the digital microphone won't work at all, as it requires
the SOF firmware.
The mic is detected and works perfectly on newer kernels (> 5.9.x) when using
the SOF firmware. The headphones work as well, only the speakers won't emit any
sound.

Basically, you have to choose between having a mic or having a speaker.
No microphone is fine for me and kernel 5.10.1 is quite modern, so I could live
with the situation for the time being.

I'll play around with the Realtek verbs in the next few days to find a
real solution, as the above fixes are dead ends.

I'd be very glad to receive some input from the other Yoga Duet 7
owners.

Cheers for now!

--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1958019

Title:
[Lenovo Legion7 16ACHg6 82N6, Realtek ALC287, Speaker, Internal] No
sound at all

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/sound-2.6/+bug/1958019/+subscriptions

--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1958813] Re: [snap] I have on clean install some weird folder /home/user/Downloads/firefox.tmp/

2022-02-12 Thread Bug Watch Updater

Launchpad has imported 7 comments from the remote bug at
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1733750.

If you reply to an imported comment from within Launchpad, your comment
will be sent to the remote bug automatically. Read more about
Launchpad's inter-bugtracker facilities at
https://help.launchpad.net/InterBugTracking.

On 2021-10-02T04:43:17+00:00 Douglas Silva wrote:

User Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:92.0) Gecko/20100101
Firefox/92.0

Steps to reproduce:

1. Install Ubuntu 21.10 (impish). It ships with Firefox installed as a Snap 
that is maintained by Mozilla.
2. Check the ~/Downloads directory, it should be empty
3. Run Firefox.
4. Check the ~/Downloads directory, it should now have an empty directory named 
"firefox.tmp".

Actual results:

An empty directory is being created at ~/Downloads and I believe this is
not the intended behavior. The directory never goes away, it just stays
there. If you delete it, it will be recreated when you run Firefox
again.

Expected results:

It shouldn't create temporary files in my Downloads directory.

Reply at:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox/+bug/1958813/comments/0

On 2021-10-02T05:17:38+00:00 Release-mgmt-account-bot wrote:

The [Bugbug](https://github.com/mozilla/bugbug/) bot thinks this bug
should belong to the 'Core::Widget: Gtk' component, and is moving the
bug to that component. Please revert this change in case you think the
bot is wrong.

Reply at:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox/+bug/1958813/comments/1

On 2021-10-22T15:13:36+00:00 Sygczsjy wrote:

User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101
Firefox/91.0

I have observed the same problem. Ubuntu 21.10, default installed
Firefox, Snap version 93.0 according to About Firefox.

If the user deletes the directory ~/Downloads/firefox.tmp/ while Firefox
is running, Firefox may recreate it at a later point. In some cases the
directory is empty. In other cases, it contains temporary files.

My best guess is that it has to do with a change noted in [this
thread](https://forum.snapcraft.io/t/xdg-open-not-working-on-
firefox/17670/14):

> There’s no `mimeapps.list` file any more, and the `snapcraft.yaml` now sets 
> `GTK_USE_PORTAL=1` in the environment. This causes the GLib APIs to ask 
> `xdg-desktop-portal` to open any files it can’t otherwise find a handler for.
>
> The other change in tip is to set `$TMPDIR` to somewhere other than `/tmp` 
> (specifically, it sets it to `~/Downloads/firefox.tmp`). When Firefox tries 
> to open a file of a type it doesn’t understand, it downloads and saves a copy 
> of it to the temp files directory, and then tries to open that file with its 
> associated handler. This is a problem for snaps, since `/tmp` inside the 
> sandbox is different to `/tmp` outside of the sandbox. Using a different 
> location allows the file to be passed to the helper outside the sandbox.

Reply at:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox/+bug/1958813/comments/2

On 2021-10-22T15:18:35+00:00 Olivier Tilloy wrote:

This is actually intended: it was added in
https://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/015f42782c5e, to ensure that
other snaps can open files downloaded by firefox. See
https://forum.snapcraft.io/t/sharing-files-via-tmp/1613 for details.

Reply at:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox/+bug/1958813/comments/3

On 2021-10-22T15:36:15+00:00 Olivier Tilloy wrote:

And with https://git.launchpad.net/~mozilla-snaps/+git/firefox-
snap/commit/?id=f7022494b8d02835617be47226cd55d455ee84fd I moved the
workaround and added a comment to make the intent clearer.

Reply at:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox/+bug/1958813/comments/4

On 2021-10-22T21:55:48+00:00 Sygczsjy wrote:

"Downloads" seems like an inelegant place for the firefox tmp dir.
Downloads is normally the directory for files the user downloads,
whereas software usually stores its temporary files in a hidden
directory like `.cache` or `.local/share/`. The effect is that the
user's Downloads directory is intruded upon by the seemingly random
files like a `mesa_shader_cache` directory. Perhaps the firefox
temporary directory could be placed in a less obtrusive location.

Reply at:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox/+bug/1958813/comments/5

On 2021-10-25T15:36:56+00:00 Olivier Tilloy wrote:

Of interest, is bug 1710926 : if I set
`browser.download.improvements_to_download_panel` to `true`, then files
are

[Bug 1960727] Re: When apt holds back updates, it fails to inform the user of the reason

2022-02-12 Thread Axel Beckert

** Package changed: aptitude (Ubuntu) => apt (Ubuntu)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1960727

Title:
  When apt holds back updates, it fails to inform the user of the reason

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/+bug/1960727/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1960727] [NEW] When apt holds back updates, it fails to inform the user of the reason

2022-02-12 Thread David Hillman

Public bug reported:

In the case where apt refuses to install and holds back certain
packages, only the following output is produced:

root@system:/home/admin# apt upgrade
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree   
Reading state information... Done
Calculating upgrade... Done
The following packages have been kept back:
  [ List of packages ]
0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 24 not upgraded.


Missing is any explanation about which package is responsible for apt refusing 
to perform its job, or even what is the reason for that package being 
uninstallable.

This bug leads users to believe that official Ubuntu packages are
routinely misconstructed, corrupt, or otherwise junk.

Fix: Instead of apt simply responding "No Dave, I'm Afraid I Can't Do
that", correct the output to include the specific package that has a
missing or unresolved dependency, so the user a) has confidence that the
process works correctly and b) can proceed with fixing the problem.


This bug is longstanding, so I don't think version details are required, but 
they follow anyway:

1) Distributor ID: Ubuntu
Description:Ubuntu 20.04.3 LTS
Release:20.04
Codename:   focal

2) # apt --version
apt 2.0.6 (amd64)

** Affects: aptitude (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1960727

Title:
  When apt holds back updates, it fails to inform the user of the reason

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/aptitude/+bug/1960727/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1960702] Re: all snap apps gone after snap upgrade

2022-02-12 Thread Bram Geron

I have the same issue. And I also have fish as my login shell.
Presumably there's a connection. Though the way I understand Ubuntu's
design, gnome-session should be managing my environment (and not
indirectly using my login shell).

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1960702

Title:
  all snap apps gone after snap upgrade

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/snapd/+bug/1960702/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1960702] Re: all snap apps gone after snap upgrade

2022-02-12 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker

Status changed to 'Confirmed' because the bug affects multiple users.

** Changed in: snapd (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Confirmed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1960702

Title:
  all snap apps gone after snap upgrade

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/snapd/+bug/1960702/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1515446] Re: network file systems in FSTAB no longer mount at boot with NetworkManager

2022-02-12 Thread Bug Watch Updater

** Changed in: network-manager (Debian)
   Status: New => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1515446

Title:
  network file systems in FSTAB no longer mount at boot with
  NetworkManager

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/hundredpapercuts/+bug/1515446/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1960725] [NEW] synaptic package manager does not run

2022-02-12 Thread Chris Hall

Public bug reported:

On 2 separate computers, both running 21.10, synaptic will not execute.
All that happens is a wait symbol and then nothing appears. Package
synaptic was removed with purge then reinstalled but this did not help.

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 21.10
Package: synaptic 0.90.2
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.11.0-37.41-generic 5.11.22
Uname: Linux 5.11.0-37-generic x86_64
ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu67
Architecture: amd64
CasperMD5CheckResult: unknown
Date: Sat Feb 12 16:58:43 2022
InstallationDate: Installed on 2018-12-04 (1166 days ago)
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 18.04.1 LTS "Bionic Beaver" - Release amd64 (20180725)
ProcEnviron:
 LANGUAGE=en_CA:en
 TERM=xterm-256color
 PATH=(custom, no user)
 LANG=en_CA.UTF-8
 SHELL=/bin/bash
SourcePackage: synaptic
UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to impish on 2021-10-29 (106 days ago)

** Affects: synaptic (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug impish third-party-packages

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1960725

Title:
  synaptic package manager does not run

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/synaptic/+bug/1960725/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1753303] Re: package ttf-mscorefonts-installer 3.4+nmu1ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1

2022-02-12 Thread Chris Guiver

Thank you for reporting this bug to Ubuntu.

Ubuntu 16.04 (xenial) reached end-of-standard-support on April 29, 2021.

See this document for currently supported Ubuntu releases:
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Releases

We appreciate that this bug may be old and you might not be interested
in discussing it any more. But if you are then please upgrade to the
latest Ubuntu version and re-test. If you then find the bug is still
present in the newer Ubuntu version, please add a comment here telling
us which new version it is in.

** Changed in: msttcorefonts (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Incomplete

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1753303

Title:
  package ttf-mscorefonts-installer 3.4+nmu1ubuntu2 failed to
  install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script
  returned error exit status 1

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/msttcorefonts/+bug/1753303/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1755923] Re: package ttf-mscorefonts-installer 3.4+nmu1ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1

2022-02-12 Thread Chris Guiver

Thank you for reporting this bug to Ubuntu.

Ubuntu 16.04 (xenial) reached end-of-standard-support on April 29, 2021.

See this document for currently supported Ubuntu releases:
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Releases

We appreciate that this bug may be old and you might not be interested
in discussing it any more. But if you are then please upgrade to the
latest Ubuntu version and re-test. If you then find the bug is still
present in the newer Ubuntu version, please add a comment here telling
us which new version it is in.

** Changed in: msttcorefonts (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Incomplete

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1755923

Title:
  package ttf-mscorefonts-installer 3.4+nmu1ubuntu2 failed to
  install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script
  returned error exit status 1

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/msttcorefonts/+bug/1755923/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1746878] Re: package ttf-mscorefonts-installer (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: subprocess new pre-installation script was killed by signal (Terminated)

2022-02-12 Thread Chris Guiver

Thank you for reporting this bug to Ubuntu.

Ubuntu 16.04 (xenial) reached end-of-standard-support on April 29, 2021.

See this document for currently supported Ubuntu releases:
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Releases

We appreciate that this bug may be old and you might not be interested
in discussing it any more. But if you are then please upgrade to the
latest Ubuntu version and re-test. If you then find the bug is still
present in the newer Ubuntu version, please add a comment here telling
us which new version it is in.

** Changed in: msttcorefonts (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Incomplete

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1746878

Title:
  package ttf-mscorefonts-installer (not installed) failed to
  install/upgrade: subprocess new pre-installation script was killed by
  signal (Terminated)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/msttcorefonts/+bug/1746878/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1754838] Re: Se encontraron errores al procesar: ttf-mscorefonts-installer E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)

2022-02-12 Thread Chris Guiver

Thank you for reporting this bug to Ubuntu.

Ubuntu 16.04 (xenial) reached end-of-standard-support on April 29, 2021.

See this document for currently supported Ubuntu releases:
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Releases

We appreciate that this bug may be old and you might not be interested
in discussing it any more. But if you are then please upgrade to the
latest Ubuntu version and re-test. If you then find the bug is still
present in the newer Ubuntu version, please add a comment here telling
us which new version it is in.

** Changed in: msttcorefonts (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Incomplete

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1754838

Title:
  Se encontraron errores al procesar:  ttf-mscorefonts-installer E: Sub-
  process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/msttcorefonts/+bug/1754838/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1940851] Re: False positive: "running_procs" incorrectly reports libkeyutils.so.1.9 as "Spam tool component"

2022-02-12 Thread Mathias Homann

I'm having the same kind of problem on a host that has postgres running
inside a docker container.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1940851

Title:
  False positive: "running_procs" incorrectly reports libkeyutils.so.1.9
  as "Spam tool component"

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/rkhunter/+bug/1940851/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1741705] Re: package ttf-mscorefonts-installer (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: package is in a very bad inconsistent state; you should reinstall it before attempting a removal

2022-02-12 Thread Chris Guiver

Thank you for reporting this bug to Ubuntu.

Ubuntu 16.04 (xenial) reached end-of-standard-support on April 29, 2021.

See this document for currently supported Ubuntu releases:
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Releases

We appreciate that this bug may be old and you might not be interested
in discussing it any more. But if you are then please upgrade to the
latest Ubuntu version and re-test. If you then find the bug is still
present in the newer Ubuntu version, please add a comment here telling
us which new version it is in.

** Changed in: msttcorefonts (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Incomplete

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1741705

Title:
  package ttf-mscorefonts-installer (not installed) failed to
  install/upgrade: package is in a very bad inconsistent state; you
  should  reinstall it before attempting a removal

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/msttcorefonts/+bug/1741705/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1744018] Re: package ttf-mscorefonts-installer (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: 子进程新的 pre-installation 脚本被信号(已终止) 终止了

2022-02-12 Thread Chris Guiver

Thank you for reporting this bug to Ubuntu.

Ubuntu 16.04 (xenial) reached end-of-standard-support on April 29, 2021.

See this document for currently supported Ubuntu releases:
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Releases

We appreciate that this bug may be old and you might not be interested
in discussing it any more. But if you are then please upgrade to the
latest Ubuntu version and re-test. If you then find the bug is still
present in the newer Ubuntu version, please add a comment here telling
us which new version it is in.

** Changed in: msttcorefonts (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Incomplete

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1744018

Title:
  package ttf-mscorefonts-installer (not installed) failed to
  install/upgrade: 子进程 新的 pre-installation 脚本 被信号(已终止) 终止了

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/msttcorefonts/+bug/1744018/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1735854] Re: package ttf-mscorefonts-installer (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: subprocess new pre-installation script returned error exit status 128

2022-02-12 Thread Chris Guiver

Thank you for reporting this bug to Ubuntu.

Ubuntu 14.04 (trusty) reached end-of-standard-support on April 25, 2019.

See this document for currently supported Ubuntu releases:
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Releases

We appreciate that this bug may be old and you might not be interested
in discussing it any more. But if you are then please upgrade to the
latest Ubuntu version and re-test. If you then find the bug is still
present in the newer Ubuntu version, please add a comment here telling
us which new version it is in.

** Changed in: msttcorefonts (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Incomplete

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1735854

Title:
  package ttf-mscorefonts-installer (not installed) failed to
  install/upgrade: subprocess new pre-installation script returned error
  exit status 128

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/msttcorefonts/+bug/1735854/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1875114] Re: freeipa-server package missing on Ubuntu 20.04

2022-02-12 Thread Timo Aaltonen

yes it would, although there are still issues and it's looking unlikely
that a server package will be in 22.04

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1875114

Title:
  freeipa-server package missing on Ubuntu 20.04

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/freeipa/+bug/1875114/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

1 2 3 >

1 - 100 of 221 matches

Mail list logo