[Bug 700958] Re: tail -f gives misleading error message when inotify limit is reached

2012-06-02 Thread A. Bram Neijt
No problem in core-utils 8.13:
$ sudo sh -c 'echo 10  /proc/sys/fs/inotify/max_user_watches'
$ touch /tmp/hello
$ tail -f /tmp/hello 
tail: inotify resources exhausted
tail: inotify cannot be used, reverting to polling

** Changed in: coreutils (Ubuntu)
   Status: Triaged = Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/700958

Title:
  tail -f gives misleading error message when inotify limit is reached

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/coreutils/+bug/700958/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 700958] Re: tail -f gives misleading error message when inotify limit is reached

2012-06-02 Thread A. Bram Neijt
No problem in core-utils 8.13:
$ sudo sh -c 'echo 10  /proc/sys/fs/inotify/max_user_watches'
$ touch /tmp/hello
$ tail -f /tmp/hello 
tail: inotify resources exhausted
tail: inotify cannot be used, reverting to polling

** Changed in: coreutils
   Status: New = Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/700958

Title:
  tail -f gives misleading error message when inotify limit is reached

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/coreutils/+bug/700958/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 997332] Re: Markdown result is corrupt/unpredictable per invocation

2012-05-11 Thread A. Bram Neijt
Actually not a bug, but as a friend of mine pointed out, a feature: The
e-mail address is garbled to make it less legible for spam bots.

More information can be found here:
http://daringfireball.net/projects/markdown/syntax#autolink

** Changed in: markdown (Ubuntu)
   Status: New = Invalid

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/997332

Title:
  Markdown result is corrupt/unpredictable per invocation

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/markdown/+bug/997332/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 997332] [NEW] Markdown result is corrupt/unpredictable per invocation

2012-05-09 Thread A. Bram Neijt
Public bug reported:

When using the following text in markdown (test.md):

_by A. Bram Neijt bne...@gmail.com_

I'm able to create (at least) four different results using the markdown
command:

$ markdown test.md 
pemby A. Bram Neijt a 
href=#109;#x61;#105;#108;t#111;:b#x6E;#x65;#105;#106;#x74;#64;#x67;#x6D;#97;#105;#x6C;#x2E;#x63;#111;#109;b#x6E;#x65;#105;#106;#x74;#64;#x67;#x6D;#97;#105;#x6C;#x2E;#x63;#111;#109;/a/em/p

$ markdown test.md 
pemby A. Bram Neijt a 
href=#x6D;#x61;#105;#108;t#x6F;:#x62;#110;#101;#105;#106;#116;#64;#x67;#109;#x61;#x69;#x6C;#46;#99;#111;m#x62;#110;#101;#105;#106;#116;#64;#x67;#109;#x61;#x69;#x6C;#46;#99;#111;m/a/em/p

$ markdown test.md 
pemby A. Bram Neijt a 
href=#x6D;#97;#x69;#x6C;#x74;#x6F;:#98;#110;#101;#105;#x6A;#116;#64;g#x6D;#x61;i#x6C;#x2E;#99;#x6F;#109;#98;#110;#101;#105;#x6A;#116;#64;g#x6D;#x61;i#x6C;#x2E;#99;#x6F;#109;/a/em/p

$ markdown test.md 
pemby A. Bram Neijt a 
href=#109;#97;#105;#108;#x74;#111;:b#110;ei#106;#116;#64;#103;#109;a#x69;l#x2E;c#111;#x6D;b#110;ei#106;#116;#64;#103;#109;a#x69;l#x2E;c#111;#x6D;/a/em/p


If I run the command in watch I can see the output jump around.

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04
Package: markdown 1.0.1-7
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-24.38-generic 3.2.16
Uname: Linux 3.2.0-24-generic x86_64
ApportVersion: 2.0.1-0ubuntu7
Architecture: amd64
CheckboxSubmission: 95d5a9d3c6f3b2742cea9be15d9681a7
CheckboxSystem: d00f84de8a555815fa1c4660280da308
Date: Wed May  9 22:47:31 2012
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 12.04 LTS Precise Pangolin - Release amd64 
(20120425)
PackageArchitecture: all
SourcePackage: markdown
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

** Affects: markdown (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug precise third-party-packages

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/997332

Title:
  Markdown result is corrupt/unpredictable per invocation

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/markdown/+bug/997332/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 997332] Re: Markdown result is corrupt/unpredictable per invocation

2012-05-09 Thread A. Bram Neijt
** Attachment added: The test.md document I used.
   https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/997332/+attachment/3139108/+files/test.md

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/997332

Title:
  Markdown result is corrupt/unpredictable per invocation

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/markdown/+bug/997332/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 889735] Re: unoconv using deprecated LibreOffice switches

2012-01-11 Thread A. Bram Neijt
I'd have to take some time to fork the code, but why not use something
like:

import os
def isLibreOffice(binaryPath):
return libre in os.path.realpath(binaryPath).lower()

print is libre, isLibreOffice(/usr/bin/soffice)


I have not tested this on Windows, but it should help fix the errors on my 
system at least ;) Post a comment if you want me to take the time to convert 
this into a patch on github.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/889735

Title:
  unoconv using deprecated LibreOffice switches

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unoconv/+bug/889735/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 885722] Re: Automatic hibernate on Dell Latitude E6410 because of phantom battery reading

2012-01-04 Thread A. Bram Neijt
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 852406 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/852406

** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 882160
   Extra battery detected which does not exist and is considered empty
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 852406
   Phantom battery appears after resume from suspend

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/885722

Title:
  Automatic hibernate on Dell Latitude E6410 because of phantom battery
  reading

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-power-manager/+bug/885722/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 884200] Re: nonexisting batteries after resume cause suspend

2012-01-04 Thread A. Bram Neijt
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 852406 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/852406

** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 882160
   Extra battery detected which does not exist and is considered empty
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 852406
   Phantom battery appears after resume from suspend

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/884200

Title:
  nonexisting batteries after resume cause suspend

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/upower/+bug/884200/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 882160] Re: Extra battery detected which does not exist and is considered empty

2012-01-04 Thread A. Bram Neijt
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 852406 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/852406

** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 852406
   Phantom battery appears after resume from suspend

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/882160

Title:
  Extra battery detected which does not exist and is considered empty

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-power-manager/+bug/882160/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 879021] Re: After suspend-resume cycle, the laptop's battery appears twice in the power applet

2012-01-04 Thread A. Bram Neijt
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 852406 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/852406

** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 882160
   Extra battery detected which does not exist and is considered empty
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 852406
   Phantom battery appears after resume from suspend

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/879021

Title:
  After suspend-resume cycle, the laptop's battery appears twice in the
  power applet

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-shell/+bug/879021/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 888137] [NEW] [whishlist] Allow the default power_governor to be set

2011-11-09 Thread A. Bram Neijt
Public bug reported:

Currently the ondemand init script will set the ondemand power governor
at boot.

I would like the ondemand script to be generalized into a cpufreq script
with an accompanying /etc/default/cpufreq file which allows you to set
the default power governor at boot to something else then ondemand.

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.10
Package: initscripts 2.88dsf-13.10ubuntu4
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.0.0-13.22-generic 3.0.6
Uname: Linux 3.0.0-13-generic x86_64
ApportVersion: 1.23-0ubuntu4
Architecture: amd64
CheckboxSubmission: 95d5a9d3c6f3b2742cea9be15d9681a7
CheckboxSystem: d00f84de8a555815fa1c4660280da308
Date: Wed Nov  9 17:00:16 2011
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 11.10 Oneiric Ocelot - Release amd64 (20111012)
ProcEnviron:
 PATH=(custom, user)
 LANG=en_US.UTF-8
 SHELL=/bin/bash
SourcePackage: sysvinit
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

** Affects: sysvinit (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug oneiric

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/888137

Title:
  [whishlist] Allow the default power_governor to be set

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sysvinit/+bug/888137/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 888137] Re: [whishlist] Allow the default power_governor to be set

2011-11-09 Thread A. Bram Neijt
-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/888137

Title:
  [whishlist] Allow the default power_governor to be set

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sysvinit/+bug/888137/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 875447] Re: Typo on line 9 of /usr/share/acpi-support/power-funcs

2011-11-06 Thread A. Bram Neijt
ApportVersion: 1.23-0ubuntu4
Architecture: amd64
CheckboxSubmission: eba05164b74fe515f1989a2faf417dfe
CheckboxSystem: d00f84de8a555815fa1c4660280da308
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.10
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 11.10 Oneiric Ocelot - Release amd64 (20111012)
Package: acpi-support 0.138
PackageArchitecture: amd64
ProcEnviron:
 PATH=(custom, user)
 LANG=en_US.UTF-8
 SHELL=/bin/bash
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.1.0-2.3-generic 3.1.0
Tags:  oneiric
Uname: Linux 3.1.0-2-generic x86_64
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
UserGroups: adm admin cdrom dialout lpadmin plugdev sambashare


** Tags added: apport-collected oneiric

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/875447

Title:
  Typo on line 9 of /usr/share/acpi-support/power-funcs

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/acpid/+bug/875447/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 875447] Dependencies.txt

2011-11-06 Thread A. Bram Neijt
apport information

** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/875447/+attachment/2587170/+files/Dependencies.txt

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/875447

Title:
  Typo on line 9 of /usr/share/acpi-support/power-funcs

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/acpid/+bug/875447/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 531762] Re: System monitor System tab should show architecture (32/64bit)

2011-11-05 Thread A. Bram Neijt
System settings now has a System Info  icon, which shows the 64-bit in
the OS type field of the overview.

Fixed if you ask me, this bug can be closed.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/531762

Title:
  System monitor System tab should show architecture (32/64bit)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/gnome-system-monitor/+bug/531762/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 818574] Re: Unable to set APN with space in it

2011-10-28 Thread A. Bram Neijt
To answer the last question, I'm in the Netherlands. However, I do not
own the hardware I was reporting this bug on, and I can not test the
different settings anymore.

Therefore I'm closing this bug report. I think that it should be
possible to set an APN with a space (as other platforms like Android and
Windows allow it) but as I have no way of adding information, I'm
marking this as an opinion.

** Changed in: mobile-broadband-provider-info (Ubuntu)
   Status: Incomplete = Opinion

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/818574

Title:
  Unable to set APN with space in it

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mobile-broadband-provider-info/+bug/818574/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 882160] [NEW] Extra battery detected which does not exist and is considered empty

2011-10-26 Thread A. Bram Neijt
Public bug reported:

After a supsend, gnome-power-manager detects a second battery which is
empty. The battery shows up in the panel icon.

When I start gnome-power-statistics, from the commandline, it lists the second 
battery and then aborts:
$ gnome-power-statistics 
(gnome-power-statistics:3634): PowerManager-DEBUG: got filename: ac-adapter;
(gnome-power-statistics:3634): PowerManager-DEBUG: got filename: 
gpm-battery-missing;gpm-battery-000;battery-missing;
(gnome-power-statistics:3634): PowerManager-DEBUG: got filename: 
gpm-battery-100-charging;battery-full-charging;
(gnome-power-statistics:3634): PowerManager-DEBUG: selected row is: 
/org/freedesktop/UPower/devices/battery_BAT0
(gnome-power-statistics:3634): PowerManager-DEBUG: selected row is: 
/org/freedesktop/UPower/devices/battery_BAT1
**
PowerManager:ERROR:gpm-statistics.c:416:gpm_device_state_to_localised_string: 
code should not be reached
Aborted

Because I have suspend issues with the new Oneiric release, I had
acpi_listen running in the background. This also repots a second
battery:

Started Wed Oct 26 19:02:13 CEST 2011
battery BAT0 0081 0001
battery BAT1 0081 
battery BAT0 0080 0001

The E6510 laptop is notorious for it's power problems. So I would like
to add that I have BIOS A10 and no extra kernel parameters at the
moment.

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.10
Package: gnome-power-manager 3.2.0-0ubuntu1
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.0.0-13.21-generic 3.0.6
Uname: Linux 3.0.0-13-generic x86_64
ApportVersion: 1.23-0ubuntu3
Architecture: amd64
CheckboxSubmission: 9acf66a3871e17f683940a81669f9f51
CheckboxSystem: d00f84de8a555815fa1c4660280da308
Date: Wed Oct 26 19:17:50 2011
GnomeSessionIdleInhibited: No
GnomeSessionInhibitors: None
GnomeSessionSuspendInhibited: No
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 11.10 Oneiric Ocelot - Release amd64 (20111012)
MachineType: Dell Inc. Latitude E6510
PccardctlIdent:
 Socket 0:
   no product info available
PccardctlStatus:
 Socket 0:
   no card
ProcEnviron:
 PATH=(custom, user)
 LANG=en_US.UTF-8
 SHELL=/bin/bash
ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-3.0.0-13-generic 
root=UUID=d9d49fb9-bbe3-4669-9d5f-a707232955d6 ro
SourcePackage: gnome-power-manager
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
dmi.bios.date: 08/23/2011
dmi.bios.vendor: Dell Inc.
dmi.bios.version: A10
dmi.board.name: 0N5KHN
dmi.board.vendor: Dell Inc.
dmi.board.version: A02
dmi.chassis.type: 9
dmi.chassis.vendor: Dell Inc.
dmi.modalias: 
dmi:bvnDellInc.:bvrA10:bd08/23/2011:svnDellInc.:pnLatitudeE6510:pvr0001:rvnDellInc.:rn0N5KHN:rvrA02:cvnDellInc.:ct9:cvr:
dmi.product.name: Latitude E6510
dmi.product.version: 0001
dmi.sys.vendor: Dell Inc.
gnome-power-bugreport: Error: [Errno 2] No such file or directory

** Affects: gnome-power-manager (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug oneiric

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/882160

Title:
  Extra battery detected which does not exist and is considered empty

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-power-manager/+bug/882160/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 882160] Re: Extra battery detected which does not exist and is considered empty

2011-10-26 Thread A. Bram Neijt
-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/882160

Title:
  Extra battery detected which does not exist and is considered empty

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-power-manager/+bug/882160/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 442634] Re: if laptop lid already closed, doesn't detect when it should suspend when mains power removed

2011-10-26 Thread A. Bram Neijt
I can't get the Maverick behavior to work in Oneiric.

http://mail.gnome.org/archives/commits-list/2010-November/msg06088.html

seems to state that earlier mentioned solutions will not work.

I consider this a problem with Oneiric and can't find how to fix it so
the behavior is like reported above.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/442634

Title:
  if laptop lid already closed, doesn't detect when it should suspend
  when mains power removed

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-power-manager/+bug/442634/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 818574] [NEW] Unable to set APN with space in it

2011-07-30 Thread A. Bram Neijt
Public bug reported:

My Mobile broadband APN is prepaid internet (note the space), however
the network manager does not allow me to add a space character.

Having a space in the APN name is valid and works on my Galaxy S phone,
so I know the name is both legal and valid.

** Affects: network-manager-applet (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/818574

Title:
  Unable to set APN with space in it

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/network-manager-applet/+bug/818574/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 818574] Re: Unable to set APN with space in it

2011-07-30 Thread A. Bram Neijt
Ok, I got my connection to work using an empty APN setting.

I have tried using minicom to get the dongle to accept prepaid
internet as an APN, and I still don't get how the Galaxy S phone
running Android will except prepaid internet as a valid APN. I've
tried a few different escape sequences, but none of them allowed me to
have a space in my APN setting AT command.

In the end I got AH Prepaid Mobiel internet with an Huawei E153u~1 model 
dongle working. I think the thing that got it to work was rebooting to windows 
and setting the connection type to RAS (modem) instead of NDIS in the 
Mobile Partner program that comes with the stick. This changed my modem status 
from:
ATVn
C: 0; D: 2; E: 0; F: 0; S: 0; W: 0; E: 1; L: 0; M: 0; Q: 0; V: 1;
X: 0; Z: 0; \Q: 3; \S: 0; \V: 0; O: 0; S0: 0; S2: 43; S3: 13; S4: 10;
S5: 8; S6: 2; S7: 50; S8: 2; S9: 6; S10: 14; S11: 95; S30: 0; S103: 1;
S104: 1; +FCLASS: 0; +ICF: 3,3; +IFC: 2,2; +IPR: 115200; +DR: 0;
+DS: 0,0,2048,6; +WS46: 12; +CBST: 0,0,1;
+CRLP: (61,61,48,6,0),(61,61,48,6,1),(240,240,52,6,2);
+CV120: 1,1,1,0,0,0; +CHSN: 0,0,0,0; +CSSN: 0,0; +CREG: 0; +CGREG: 0;
+CFUN:; +CSCS: IRA; +CSTA: 129; +CR: 0; +CRC: 0; +CMEE: 0; +CGDCONT: 
(1,IP,,0.0.0.0,0,0)
; +CGDSCONT: ; +CGTFT: ; +CGEQREQ: 
(1,2,0,0,0,0,2,0,0E0,0E0,3,0,0),(2,2,0,0,0,0,2,0,0E0,0E0,3,0,0),(3,2,0,0,0,0,2,0,0E0,0E0,3,0,0),(4,2,0,0,0,0,2,0,0E0,0E0,3,0,0),(5,2,0,0,0,0,2,0,0E0,0E0,3,0,0),(6,2,0,0,0,0,2,0,0E0,0E0,3,0,0),(7,2,0,0,0,0,2,0,0E0,0E0,3,0,0),(8,2,0,0,0,0,2,0,0E0,0E0,3,0,0),(9,2,0,0,0,0,2,0,0E0,0E0,3,0,0),(10,2,0,0,0,0,2,0,0E0,0E0,3,0,0),(11,2,0,0,0,0,2,0,0E0,0E0,3,0,0),(12,2,0,0,0,0,2,0,0E0,0E0,3,0,0),(13,2,0,0,0,0,2,0,0E0,0E0,3,0,0),(14,2,0,0,0,0,2,0,0E0,0E0,3,0,0),(15,2,0,0,0,0,2,0,0E0,0E0,3,0,0),(16,2,0,0,0,0,2,0,0E0,0E0,3,0,0)
; +CGEQMIN: ; +CGQREQ: ; +CGQMIN: ; ; +CGEREP: 0,0; +CGCLASS: B;
+CGSMS: 1; +CSMS: 0; +CMGF: 0; +CSAS: 0; +CRES: 0;
+CSCA: +31653131313,145; +CSMP: ,,0,0; +CSDH: 0; +CSCB: 0,,;
+FDD: 0; +FAR: 0; +FCL: 0; +FIT: 0,0; +ES: ,,; +ESA: 00,0,255,;
+CMOD: 0; +CVHU: 1; ; +CPIN: ,; +CMEC: 0,0,0; +CKPD: 1,1;
+CIND: 0,3,1,0,0,0,1,2; +CMER: 0,0,0,0,0; +CGATT: 1;  +CGACT: 0;
+CPBS: SM; +CPMS: SM,SM,SM; +CNMI: 0,0,0,0,0; +CMMS: 2; +FTS: 0;
+FRS: 0; +FTH: 3; +FRH: 3; +FTM: 96; +FRM: 96; +CCUG: 0,0,0;
+COPS: 0,2,; +CUSD: 0; +CAOC: 1; +CCWA: 0; +CCLK: ; +CLVL: 2;
+CMUT: 1; +CPOL: 0,2,,0,0,0; +CPLS: 0; +CTZR: 0; +CTZU: 0; +CLIP: 0;
+COLP: 0; +CDIP: 0; +CLIR: 0; ^PORTSEL: 0; ^CPIN: ,; ^ATRECORD: 0;
^FREQLOCK: 10981344,0; ^GLASTERR: 1; ^CVOICE: 0; ^DDSETEX: 0; ^CMSR: 0; ;
^DNSP: ; ^DNSS: ; ^AUTHDATA: 1,0,,; ^CRPN: 0, 

to

ATV

C: 1; D: 2; E: 0; F: 0; S: 0; W: 0; E: 1; L: 1; M: 0; Q: 0; V: 1;
X: 4; Z: 0; \Q: 3; \S: 0; \V: 0; O: 0; S0: 0; S2: 43; S3: 13; S4: 10;
S5: 8; S6: 2; S7: 45; S8: 2; S9: 6; S10: 14; S11: 95; S30: 0; S103: 1;
S104: 1; +FCLASS: 0; +ICF: 3,3; +IFC: 2,2; +IPR: 115200; +DR: 0;
+DS: 0,0,2048,6; +WS46: 12; +CBST: 0,0,1;
+CRLP: (61,61,48,6,0),(61,61,48,6,1),(240,240,52,6,2);
+CV120: 1,1,1,0,0,0; +CHSN: 0,0,0,0; +CSSN: 0,0; +CREG: 0; +CGREG: 0;
+CFUN:; +CSCS: IRA; +CSTA: 129; +CR: 0; +CRC: 0; +CMEE: 0; +CGDCONT: 
(1,IP,,0.0.0.0,0,0)
; +CGDSCONT: ; +CGTFT: ; +CGEQREQ: 
(1,2,0,0,0,0,2,0,0E0,0E0,3,0,0),(2,2,0,0,0,0,2,0,0E0,0E0,3,0,0),(3,2,0,0,0,0,2,0,0E0,0E0,3,0,0),(4,2,0,0,0,0,2,0,0E0,0E0,3,0,0),(5,2,0,0,0,0,2,0,0E0,0E0,3,0,0),(6,2,0,0,0,0,2,0,0E0)
; +CGEQMIN: ; +CGQREQ: ; +CGQMIN: ; ; +CGEREP: 0,0; +CGCLASS: B;
+CGSMS: 1; +CSMS: 0; +CMGF: 0; +CSAS: 0; +CRES: 0;
+CSCA: +31653131313,145; +CSMP: ,,0,0; +CSDH: 0; +CSCB: 0,,;
+FDD: 0; +FAR: 0; +FCL: 0; +FIT: 0,0; +ES: ,,; +ESA: 00,0,255,;
+CMOD: 0; +CVHU: 1; ; +CPIN: ,; +CMEC: 0,0,0;  +CKPD: 1,1;
+CIND: 0,1,1,0,0,0,1,0; +CMER: 0,0,0,0,0; +CGATT: 1; +CGACT: 0;
+CPBS: SM; +CPMS: SM,SM,SM; +CNMI: 0,0,0,0,0; +CMMS: 2; +FTS: 0;
+FRS: 0; +FTH: 3; +FRH: 3; +FTM: 96; +FRM: 96; +CCUG: 0,0,0;
+COPS: 0,2,; +CUSD: 0; +CAOC: 1; +CCWA: 0; +CCLK: ; +CLVL: 2;
+CMUT: 1; +CPOL: 0,2,,0,0,0; +CPLS: 0; +CTZR: 0; +CTZU: 0; +CLIP: 0;
+COLP: 0; +CDIP: 0; +CLIR: 0; ^PORTSEL: 0; ^CPIN: ,; ^ATRECORD: 0;
^FREQLOCK: 10981344,0; ^GLASTERR: 1; ^CVOICE: 0; ^DDSETEX: 0; ^CMSR: 0; ;
^DNSP: ; ^DNSS: ; ^AUTHDATA: 1,0,,;  ^CRPN: 0,

which got network-manager to do it's job (in combination with
modemmanager of course).

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/818574

Title:
  Unable to set APN with space in it

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/network-manager-applet/+bug/818574/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 761780] Re: autotrash crashed with NameError in on_remove_error(): global name 'execinfo' is not defined

2011-04-16 Thread A. Bram Neijt
Upstream has a fix:
https://github.com/bneijt/autotrash/pull/1

This is a typo in the autotrash script, version 0.1.5 is the first
release to fix this.


** Changed in: autotrash (Ubuntu)
   Status: New = Confirmed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/761780

Title:
  autotrash crashed with NameError in on_remove_error(): global name
  'execinfo' is not defined

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 700958] [NEW] tail -f gives misleading error message when inotify limit is reached

2011-01-10 Thread A. Bram Neijt
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: coreutils

When tail -f has inotify enabled and hits the max_user_watches limit of
inotify, the resulting error message is very misleading.

To reproduce:
1) Make sure you will hit the limit if you try another inotify request
sudo sh -c 'echo 10  /proc/sys/fs/inotify/max_user_watches'
2) Create a file:
touch /tmp/hello
3) Follow it:
tail -f /tmp/hello

Result:
tail: cannot watch `/tmp/hello': No space left on device

Expected result:
tail: cannot watch '/tmp/hello' because inotify reported: No space left on 
device

It can be verified by using strace tail -f /tmp/hello:
inotify_add_watch(4, /tmp/hello, 
IN_MODIFY|IN_ATTRIB|IN_DELETE_SELF|IN_MOVE_SELF) = -1 ENOSPC (No space left on 
device)
--- 
Architecture: amd64
CheckboxSubmission: c61c47905a08381ec5d89e05cd06d034
CheckboxSystem: d00f84de8a555815fa1c4660280da308
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.10
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.10 Maverick Meerkat - Beta amd64 (20100901.1)
NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia
Package: coreutils 8.5-1ubuntu3
PackageArchitecture: amd64
ProcEnviron:
 PATH=(custom, user)
 LANG=en_US.utf8
 SHELL=/bin/bash
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.35-24.42-generic 2.6.35.8
Tags: maverick
Uname: Linux 2.6.35-24-generic x86_64
UserGroups: adm admin cdrom dialout lpadmin plugdev sambashare

** Affects: coreutils (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: apport-collected

** Tags added: apport-collected

** Description changed:

  Binary package hint: coreutils
  
  When tail -f has inotify enabled and hits the max_user_watches limit of
  inotify, the resulting error message is very misleading.
  
  To reproduce:
  1) Make sure you will hit the limit if you try another inotify request
  sudo sh -c 'echo 10  /proc/sys/fs/inotify/max_user_watches'
  2) Create a file:
  touch /tmp/hello
  3) Follow it:
  tail -f /tmp/hello
  
  Result:
  tail: cannot watch `/tmp/hello': No space left on device
  
  Expected result:
  tail: cannot watch '/tmp/hello' because inotify reported: No space left on 
device
  
  It can be verified by using strace tail -f /tmp/hello:
  inotify_add_watch(4, /tmp/hello, 
IN_MODIFY|IN_ATTRIB|IN_DELETE_SELF|IN_MOVE_SELF) = -1 ENOSPC (No space left on 
device)
+ --- 
+ Architecture: amd64
+ CheckboxSubmission: c61c47905a08381ec5d89e05cd06d034
+ CheckboxSystem: d00f84de8a555815fa1c4660280da308
+ DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.10
+ InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.10 Maverick Meerkat - Beta amd64 (20100901.1)
+ NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia
+ Package: coreutils 8.5-1ubuntu3
+ PackageArchitecture: amd64
+ ProcEnviron:
+  PATH=(custom, user)
+  LANG=en_US.utf8
+  SHELL=/bin/bash
+ ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.35-24.42-generic 2.6.35.8
+ Tags: maverick
+ Uname: Linux 2.6.35-24-generic x86_64
+ UserGroups: adm admin cdrom dialout lpadmin plugdev sambashare

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/700958

Title:
  tail -f gives misleading error message when inotify limit is reached

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 700958] Dependencies.txt

2011-01-10 Thread A. Bram Neijt
apport information

** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt
   
https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/bugs/700958/+attachment/1789946/+files/Dependencies.txt

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/700958

Title:
  tail -f gives misleading error message when inotify limit is reached

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 700958] Re: tail -f gives misleading error message when inotify limit is reached

2011-01-10 Thread A. Bram Neijt
http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=7813

** Bug watch added: Email to bug-coreut...@gnu #
   mailto:bug-coreut...@gnu.org

** Also affects: coreutils via
   mailto:bug-coreut...@gnu.org
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/700958

Title:
  tail -f gives misleading error message when inotify limit is reached

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 660088] Re: Ricoh e822 SD-Card reader doesn't work

2010-12-19 Thread A. Bram Neijt
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 605043 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/605043

** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 605043
   Ubuntu 10.04 64 bit on Dell Lattitude E6410: Failed to read MMC card
 * You can subscribe to bug 605043 by following this link: 
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/605043/+subscribe

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/660088

Title:
  Ricoh e822 SD-Card reader doesn't work

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 525398] Re: Passenger-doc package seems empty

2010-11-07 Thread A. Bram Neijt
http://packages.debian.org/sid/all/passenger-doc/filelist shows
documentation again, debian fixed it earlier.

** Changed in: passenger (Ubuntu)
   Status: New = Fix Released

-- 
Passenger-doc package seems empty
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/525398
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 649184] Re: empathy-av crashed with SIGSEGV in pthread_mutex_lock()

2010-10-30 Thread A. Bram Neijt
I was not able to reproduce this bug with the latest versions in
maverick.

** Changed in: empathy (Ubuntu)
   Status: Incomplete = Invalid

-- 
empathy-av crashed with SIGSEGV in pthread_mutex_lock()
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/649184
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 649184] Re: empathy-av crashed with SIGSEGV in pthread_mutex_lock()

2010-09-27 Thread A. Bram Neijt
** Visibility changed to: Public

-- 
empathy-av crashed with SIGSEGV in pthread_mutex_lock()
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/649184
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 642965] Re: Dell Latitude E6510: Mouse erratic after suspend

2010-09-25 Thread A. Bram Neijt
Recent updates fixed this problem for me, I was unable to pinpoint which
update did, but I do consider it fixed now.

** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
   Status: New = Fix Released

-- 
Dell Latitude E6510: Mouse erratic after suspend
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/642965
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 642965] [NEW] Dell Latitude E6510: Mouse erratic after suspend

2010-09-19 Thread A. Bram Neijt
Public bug reported:

After a succesfull suspend and resume, both the touchpad and the
trackpoint where erratic, going all over the place and clicking
randomly.

To reproduce:
1) Suspend
2) Resume

The touchpad does not seem to be detected as a touchpad either, so the
problem may be the input driver for Xorg.

After the problem I tried to Hibernate (press power button and choose
Hibernate using the keys) to see if that fixes it. After the Hibernate
the same problem still persisted.

I'm currently running a Maverick (10.10) beta, with non-free nvidia
driver loaded (nouveau does not support this laptop yet).

** Affects: linux (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
Dell Latitude E6510: Mouse erratic after suspend
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/642965
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 642965] Re: Dell Latitude E6510: Mouse erratic after suspend

2010-09-19 Thread A. Bram Neijt

** Attachment added: The above mentioned logs (dmesg, lspci, dmesg, uname, 
version)
   https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/642965/+attachment/1609513/+files/logs.zip

-- 
Dell Latitude E6510: Mouse erratic after suspend
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/642965
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 642965] Re: Dell Latitude E6510: Mouse erratic after suspend

2010-09-19 Thread A. Bram Neijt

** Attachment added: Dmesg after suspend resume, without hibernate/restart
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/642965/+attachment/1609701/+files/dmesg.log

-- 
Dell Latitude E6510: Mouse erratic after suspend
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/642965
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 597456] [NEW] TypeError: expected string or buffer

2010-06-22 Thread A. Bram Neijt
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: bzr

I have bzr-git installed and thought I'd give:
  bzr clone git://git.gnome.org/rhythmbox
a try. It crashed, producing the given crash file.

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04
Package: bzr 2.1.1-1
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-22.36-generic 2.6.32.11+drm33.2
Uname: Linux 2.6.32-22-generic x86_64
Architecture: amd64
Date: Tue Jun 22 23:30:20 2010
EcryptfsInUse: Yes
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.04 Lucid Lynx - Alpha amd64 (20091209)
ProcEnviron:
 PATH=(custom, user)
 LANG=en_US.utf8
 SHELL=/bin/bash
SourcePackage: bzr

** Affects: bzr (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug lucid

-- 
TypeError: expected string or buffer
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/597456
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 597456] Re: TypeError: expected string or buffer

2010-06-22 Thread A. Bram Neijt

** Attachment added: Crash file
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/50764679/bzr-20100622212523-5157.crash

** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/50764614/Dependencies.txt

-- 
TypeError: expected string or buffer
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/597456
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 547070] [NEW] i965gm GPU lockup 149ab45d

2010-03-25 Thread A. Bram Neijt
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: xserver-xorg-video-intel

Opening the screen after a suspend left me with a black screen with
nothing on it. The computer did not seem to response to typing the
password or other things. I then decided to use CTRL-ALT-F3 to go to the
terminal. This succeeded without a problem, but when I switched back,
X.org crashed and this error report is the result.

ProblemType: Crash
Architecture: amd64
Chipset: i965gm
Date: Thu Mar 25 17:01:48 2010
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04
DkmsStatus: Error: [Errno 2] No such file or directory
DumpSignature: 149ab45d
ExecutablePath: /usr/share/apport/apport-gpu-error-intel.py
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.04 Lucid Lynx - Alpha amd64 (20091209)
InterpreterPath: /usr/bin/python2.6
MachineType: LENOVO 64669MG
Package: xserver-xorg-video-intel 2:2.9.1-1ubuntu16
PccardctlIdent:
 Socket 0:
   no product info available
PccardctlStatus:
 Socket 0:
   no card
ProcCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-2.6.32-17-generic 
root=UUID=6a56c236-560b-43fb-b0e4-378b524a3029 ro quiet splash
ProcCmdline: /usr/bin/python /usr/share/apport/apport-gpu-error-intel.py
ProcEnviron:
 
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-17.26-generic 2.6.32.10+drm33.1
SourcePackage: xserver-xorg-video-intel
Title: [i965gm] GPU lockup 149ab45d
Uname: Linux 2.6.32-17-generic x86_64
UserGroups:
 
dmi.bios.date: 07/01/2008
dmi.bios.vendor: LENOVO
dmi.bios.version: 7LETC1WW (2.21 )
dmi.board.name: 64669MG
dmi.board.vendor: LENOVO
dmi.board.version: Not Available
dmi.chassis.asset.tag: No Asset Information
dmi.chassis.type: 10
dmi.chassis.vendor: LENOVO
dmi.chassis.version: Not Available
dmi.modalias: 
dmi:bvnLENOVO:bvr7LETC1WW(2.21):bd07/01/2008:svnLENOVO:pn64669MG:pvrThinkPadT61:rvnLENOVO:rn64669MG:rvrNotAvailable:cvnLENOVO:ct10:cvrNotAvailable:
dmi.product.name: 64669MG
dmi.product.version: ThinkPad T61
dmi.sys.vendor: LENOVO
glxinfo: Error: [Errno 2] No such file or directory
system:
 distro: Ubuntu
 codename:   lucid
 architecture:   x86_64
 kernel: 2.6.32-17-generic

** Affects: xserver-xorg-video-intel (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-crash freeze lucid

-- 
 i965gm  GPU lockup 149ab45d
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/547070
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 547070] Re: i965gm GPU lockup 149ab45d

2010-03-25 Thread A. Bram Neijt

** Attachment added: BootDmesg.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/41972690/BootDmesg.txt

** Attachment added: CurrentDmesg.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/41972691/CurrentDmesg.txt

** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/41972692/Dependencies.txt

** Attachment added: GdmLog.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/41972693/GdmLog.txt

** Attachment added: GdmLog1.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/41972694/GdmLog1.txt

** Attachment added: GdmLog2.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/41972695/GdmLog2.txt

** Attachment added: IntelGpuDump.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/41972696/IntelGpuDump.txt

** Attachment added: Lspci.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/41972697/Lspci.txt

** Attachment added: Lsusb.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/41972698/Lsusb.txt

** Attachment added: PciDisplay.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/41972699/PciDisplay.txt

** Attachment added: ProcAttrCurrent.gz
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/41972700/ProcAttrCurrent.gz

** Attachment added: ProcCpuinfo.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/41972701/ProcCpuinfo.txt

** Attachment added: ProcInterrupts.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/41972702/ProcInterrupts.txt

** Attachment added: ProcMaps.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/41972703/ProcMaps.txt

** Attachment added: ProcModules.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/41972704/ProcModules.txt

** Attachment added: ProcStatus.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/41972705/ProcStatus.txt

** Attachment added: RelatedPackageVersions.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/41972706/RelatedPackageVersions.txt

** Attachment added: UdevDb.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/41972707/UdevDb.txt

** Attachment added: UdevLog.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/41972708/UdevLog.txt

** Attachment added: XorgLog.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/41972709/XorgLog.txt

** Attachment added: XorgLogOld.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/41972710/XorgLogOld.txt

** Attachment added: Xrandr.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/41972711/Xrandr.txt

** Attachment added: i915_error_state.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/41972712/i915_error_state.txt

** Attachment added: setxkbmap.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/41972713/setxkbmap.txt

** Attachment added: xdpyinfo.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/41972714/xdpyinfo.txt

** Attachment added: xkbcomp.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/41972715/xkbcomp.txt

-- 
 i965gm  GPU lockup 149ab45d
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/547070
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 528969] Re: WARNING: at /build/buildd/linux-2.6.32/net/wireless/core.c:614 wdev_cleanup_work 0xe9/0x110 cfg80211

2010-03-16 Thread A. Bram Neijt
** Tags added: apport-collected

-- 
WARNING: at /build/buildd/linux-2.6.32/net/wireless/core.c:614 
wdev_cleanup_work 0xe9/0x110 cfg80211
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/528969
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 321398] Re: Convert nolonger handles SVG files correctly, bad output

2010-03-03 Thread A. Bram Neijt
This bug is closed for Ubuntu Lucid (still alpha), using

Version: ImageMagick 6.5.7-8 2009-11-26 Q16 http://www.imagemagick.org
Copyright: Copyright (C) 1999-2009 ImageMagick Studio LLC
Features: OpenMP 
Which is part of version 7:6.5.7.8-1ubuntu1 of the imagemagick package.


** Changed in: imagemagick (Ubuntu)
   Status: New = Fix Released

-- 
Convert nolonger handles SVG files correctly, bad output
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/321398
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 531762] [NEW] [wishlist] System monitor System tab should show architecture (32/64bit)

2010-03-03 Thread A. Bram Neijt
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: gnome-system-monitor

After installing Ubuntu, it is not clear to the user wether they are
using a 32bit or a 64bit version.

The System Monitor System tab should contain architecture information so
people know whether they are running 32bit or 64bit. It is currently
unclear to me where people can look to decide which proprietary binary
they should download.

uname -a solves the problem, but a normal user should not rely on the
console for this information.

ProblemType: Bug
Architecture: amd64
Date: Thu Mar  4 08:19:28 2010
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04
EcryptfsInUse: Yes
ExecutablePath: /usr/bin/gnome-system-monitor
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.04 Lucid Lynx - Alpha amd64 (20091209)
Package: gnome-system-monitor 2.28.0-1ubuntu2
ProcEnviron:
 PATH=(custom, user)
 LANG=en_US.utf8
 SHELL=/bin/bash
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-15.22-generic
SourcePackage: gnome-system-monitor
Uname: Linux 2.6.32-15-generic x86_64

** Affects: gnome-system-monitor (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug lucid

-- 
[wishlist] System monitor System tab should show architecture (32/64bit)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/531762
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 531762] Re: System monitor System tab does not show architecture (32/64bit)

2010-03-03 Thread A. Bram Neijt

** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/40134634/Dependencies.txt

** Attachment added: ProcMaps.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/40134635/ProcMaps.txt

** Attachment added: ProcStatus.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/40134636/ProcStatus.txt

** Attachment added: XsessionErrors.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/40134637/XsessionErrors.txt

** Summary changed:

- System monitor System tab does not show architecture (32/64bit)
+ [wishlist] System monitor System tab should show architecture (32/64bit)

-- 
[wishlist] System monitor System tab should show architecture (32/64bit)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/531762
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 528969] [NEW] WARNING: at /build/buildd/linux-2.6.32/net/wireless/core.c:614 wdev_cleanup_work 0xe9/0x110 cfg80211

2010-02-27 Thread A. Bram Neijt
Public bug reported:

I'm very sorry to post this bug like this because there where two problems 
while reporting:
1) Apport asked me questions about the bug before I knew what the bug was, the 
only thing I knew was that it was a kernel bug. I was not able to answer all 
those questions.
2) The automatic summary was to long to search in launchpad? So there may be 
duplicates, I'm not sure.

This bug may be a result of suspending and resuming a lot while using
various wireless spots.

I hope the automatically attached bug information can help somebody out
there!

ProblemType: KernelOops
Annotation: Your system might become unstable now and might need to be 
restarted.
Architecture: amd64
Date: Sat Feb 27 13:35:14 2010
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04
Failure: oops
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.04 Lucid Lynx - Alpha amd64 (20091209)
Package: linux-image-2.6.32-14-generic 2.6.32-14.20
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-14.20-generic
Regression: Yes
SourcePackage: linux
TestedUpstream: No
Title: WARNING: at /build/buildd/linux-2.6.32/net/wireless/core.c:614 
wdev_cleanup_work+0xe9/0x110 [cfg80211]()
Uname: Linux 2.6.32-14-generic x86_64

** Affects: linux (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-kerneloops kernel-oops lucid

-- 
WARNING: at /build/buildd/linux-2.6.32/net/wireless/core.c:614 
wdev_cleanup_work 0xe9/0x110 cfg80211
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/528969
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 528969] Re: WARNING: at /build/buildd/linux-2.6.32/net/wireless/core.c:614 wdev_cleanup_work 0xe9/0x110 cfg80211

2010-02-27 Thread A. Bram Neijt

** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/39853480/Dependencies.txt

** Attachment added: OopsText.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/39853481/OopsText.txt

-- 
WARNING: at /build/buildd/linux-2.6.32/net/wireless/core.c:614 
wdev_cleanup_work 0xe9/0x110 cfg80211
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/528969
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 525398] [NEW] Passenger-doc package seems empty

2010-02-21 Thread A. Bram Neijt
Public bug reported:


To reproduce:
- Install passenger-doc
- Run: dpkg -L passenger-doc

Actual result
/.
/usr
/usr/share
/usr/share/doc
/usr/share/doc/passenger-doc
/usr/share/doc/passenger-doc/README
/usr/share/doc/passenger-doc/copyright
/usr/share/doc/passenger-doc/NEWS.gz
/usr/share/doc/passenger-doc/changelog.Debian.gz

Expected result:
More documentation, even HTML pages which describe the usage of mod-passenger.

Debian seems to have the same package contents:
http://packages.debian.org/sid/all/passenger-doc/filelist
which may indicate that it is intended behavior. However, as a user I do not 
consider this package delivering on what it's description promises.

ProblemType: Bug
Architecture: amd64
Date: Sun Feb 21 18:47:36 2010
Dependencies:
 
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04
EcryptfsInUse: Yes
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.04 Lucid Lynx - Alpha amd64 (20091209)
Package: passenger-doc 2.2.7debian-1
PackageArchitecture: all
ProcEnviron:
 SHELL=/bin/bash
 PATH=(custom, user)
 LANG=en_US.utf8
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-14.20-generic
SourcePackage: passenger
Uname: Linux 2.6.32-14-generic x86_64

** Affects: passenger (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug lucid

-- 
Passenger-doc package seems empty
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/525398
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 483760] Re: gr_monitor crashed with SIGSEGV in fgEnumWindows()

2010-01-18 Thread A. Bram Neijt
** Changed in: grmonitor (Ubuntu)
   Status: New = Confirmed

-- 
gr_monitor crashed with SIGSEGV in fgEnumWindows()
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/483760
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 295304] Re: HTML documentation is compressed

2010-01-17 Thread A. Bram Neijt
Libbobcat2-dev does not exhibit this bug.

** Changed in: bobcat (Ubuntu)
   Status: New = Fix Released

-- 
HTML documentation is compressed
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/295304
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 507941] [NEW] pacmd running wild 100% CPU

2010-01-15 Thread A. Bram Neijt
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: pulseaudio

On lucid AMD64 alpha 2 (upgraded from a fresh alpha 1 Lucid install)
pacmd is now running at 100%. Killing the process will spawn another
process of pacmd with the same 100% CPU load. Another inconvenience is
the fact that pacmd seems to be inhibiting suspend also.

I've tried killing pacmd mulitple times, but it just keeps coming back
with 100%  CPU, I finally decided to rm -rf .pulse .pulse-cookie and
then kill pacmd and that seems to fix the problem ;)

ProblemType: Bug
AlsaVersion: Advanced Linux Sound Architecture Driver Version 1.0.21.
Architecture: amd64
ArecordDevices:
  List of CAPTURE Hardware Devices 
 card 0: Intel [HDA Intel], device 0: AD198x Analog [AD198x Analog]
   Subdevices: 2/2
   Subdevice #0: subdevice #0
   Subdevice #1: subdevice #1
AudioDevicesInUse:
 USERPID ACCESS COMMAND
 /dev/snd/controlC0:  bram   1936 F pulseaudio
Card0.Amixer.info:
 Card hw:0 'Intel'/'HDA Intel at 0xfe02 irq 17'
   Mixer name   : 'Analog Devices AD1984'
   Components   : 'HDA:11d41984,17aa20bb,00100400'
   Controls  : 29
   Simple ctrls  : 18
Date: Fri Jan 15 15:27:59 2010
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04
EcryptfsInUse: Yes
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.04 Lucid Lynx - Alpha amd64 (20091209)
Package: pulseaudio-utils 1:0.9.22~0.9.21+341-g62bf-0ubuntu1
ProcEnviron:
 SHELL=/bin/bash
 PATH=(custom, user)
 LANG=en_US.UTF-8
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-10.14-generic
SourcePackage: pulseaudio
Tags: lucid
Uname: Linux 2.6.32-10-generic x86_64

** Affects: pulseaudio (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug lucid

-- 
pacmd running wild 100% CPU
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/507941
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 507941] Re: pacmd running wild 100% CPU

2010-01-15 Thread A. Bram Neijt

** Attachment added: AlsaDevices.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/37923583/AlsaDevices.txt

** Attachment added: AplayDevices.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/37923584/AplayDevices.txt

** Attachment added: BootDmesg.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/37923585/BootDmesg.txt

** Attachment added: Card0.Amixer.values.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/37923586/Card0.Amixer.values.txt

** Attachment added: Card0.Codecs.codec.0.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/37923587/Card0.Codecs.codec.0.txt

** Attachment added: CurrentDmesg.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/37923588/CurrentDmesg.txt

** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/37923589/Dependencies.txt

** Attachment added: PciMultimedia.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/37923590/PciMultimedia.txt

** Attachment added: ProcCpuinfo.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/37923591/ProcCpuinfo.txt

-- 
pacmd running wild 100% CPU
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/507941
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 507941] Re: pacmd running wild 100% CPU

2010-01-15 Thread A. Bram Neijt
I've found a way to reproduce this bug, it is caused by suspending. If I
try to suspend the system, it will fail and pacmd will go off at 100%
CPU. After killing pulseaudio, pacmd is no longer re-spawned.

This issue seems to be connected to suspending in the newest Lucid.

** Attachment added: Logfile as per https://wiki.ubuntu.com/PulseAudio/Log;
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/37925840/pulseverbose.log.gz

** Summary changed:

- pacmd running wild 100% CPU
+ pacmd running wild 100% CPU when trying to suspend

-- 
pacmd running wild 100% CPU when trying to suspend
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/507941
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 503797] Re: Can not disable shadows in Window Decoration

2010-01-06 Thread A. Bram Neijt

** Attachment added: BootDmesg.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/37494884/BootDmesg.txt

** Attachment added: CurrentDmesg.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/37494885/CurrentDmesg.txt

** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/37494886/Dependencies.txt

** Attachment added: GconfCompiz.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/37494887/GconfCompiz.txt

** Attachment added: Lspci.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/37494888/Lspci.txt

** Attachment added: Lsusb.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/37494889/Lsusb.txt

** Attachment added: ProcCpuinfo.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/37494890/ProcCpuinfo.txt

** Attachment added: ProcInterrupts.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/37494891/ProcInterrupts.txt

** Attachment added: ProcMaps.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/37494892/ProcMaps.txt

** Attachment added: ProcModules.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/37494893/ProcModules.txt

** Attachment added: ProcStatus.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/37494894/ProcStatus.txt

** Attachment added: UdevDb.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/37494895/UdevDb.txt

** Attachment added: UdevLog.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/37494896/UdevLog.txt

** Attachment added: XorgLog.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/37494897/XorgLog.txt

** Attachment added: XorgLogOld.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/37494898/XorgLogOld.txt

** Attachment added: Xrandr.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/37494899/Xrandr.txt

** Attachment added: XsessionErrors.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/37494900/XsessionErrors.txt

-- 
Can not disable shadows in Window Decoration
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/503797
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 503797] [NEW] Can not disable shadows in Window Decoration

2010-01-06 Thread A. Bram Neijt
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: compiz

Using the CompizConfig Setings Manager it is impossible to disable
shadows using the Shadow windows configuration. The default value is
any but changing this to anything else does not have any effect on the
visibility of window shadows. Turning shadows off is therefore
impossible.

The documentation suggests[1] an empty field, which does not work.
Inventive other things like !any and title=Calculator do not have
any effect either.

To reproduce the bug:
1) Install and open ccsm
2) Go to the Window Decoration plugin
3) Change the default value of any in the bottom field (Shadow windows) to 
anything else

What happens:
Nothing, I would expect it to have some kind of immediate effect just like with 
the Decoration Windows field. Rebooting (full restart) does not help.

Expected behavior: Either the shadows of some windows would disappear.

[1] http://wiki.compiz.org/WindowMatching

ProblemType: Bug
Architecture: amd64
CompizPlugins: 
[core,ccp,move,resize,place,decoration,imgjpeg,staticswitcher,svg,commands,dbus,gnomecompat,text,session,png,workarounds,regex,scale,glib,vpswitch,wall,expo,resizeinfo,scaleaddon,snap]
Date: Wed Jan  6 14:40:11 2010
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04
EcryptfsInUse: Yes
ExecutablePath: /usr/bin/compiz
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.04 Lucid Lynx - Alpha amd64 (20091209)
MachineType: LENOVO 64669MG
Package: compiz-core 1:0.8.4-0ubuntu9
PccardctlIdent:
 Socket 0:
   no product info available
PccardctlStatus:
 Socket 0:
   no card
PciDisplay: 00:02.0 VGA compatible controller [0300]: Intel Corporation Mobile 
GM965/GL960 Integrated Graphics Controller [8086:2a02] (rev 0c)
ProcCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-2.6.32-7-generic 
root=UUID=6a56c236-560b-43fb-b0e4-378b524a3029 ro quiet splash
ProcEnviron:
 PATH=(custom, user)
 LANG=en_US.UTF-8
 SHELL=/bin/bash
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-7.10-generic
RelatedPackageVersions:
 xserver-xorg 1:7.5~3ubuntu2
 libgl1-mesa-glx 7.6.1~rc2-1ubuntu1
 libdrm2 2.4.14-1ubuntu1
 xserver-xorg-video-intel 2:2.9.1-1ubuntu1
 xserver-xorg-video-ati 1:6.12.99+git20090929.7968e1fb-0ubuntu2
SourcePackage: compiz
Tags: lucid
Uname: Linux 2.6.32-7-generic x86_64
XorgConf: Error: [Errno 2] No such file or directory: '/etc/X11/xorg.conf'
dmi.bios.date: 07/01/2008
dmi.bios.vendor: LENOVO
dmi.bios.version: 7LETC1WW (2.21 )
dmi.board.name: 64669MG
dmi.board.vendor: LENOVO
dmi.board.version: Not Available
dmi.chassis.asset.tag: No Asset Information
dmi.chassis.type: 10
dmi.chassis.vendor: LENOVO
dmi.chassis.version: Not Available
dmi.modalias: 
dmi:bvnLENOVO:bvr7LETC1WW(2.21):bd07/01/2008:svnLENOVO:pn64669MG:pvrThinkPadT61:rvnLENOVO:rn64669MG:rvrNotAvailable:cvnLENOVO:ct10:cvrNotAvailable:
dmi.product.name: 64669MG
dmi.product.version: ThinkPad T61
dmi.sys.vendor: LENOVO
glxinfo: Error: [Errno 2] No such file or directory
system: distro = Ubuntu, architecture = x86_64, kernel = 2.6.32-7-generic

** Affects: compiz (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug lucid

-- 
Can not disable shadows in Window Decoration
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/503797
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 503797] Re: Can not disable shadows in Window Decoration

2010-01-06 Thread A. Bram Neijt
I've just discovered the weirdest thing, using any  !(class=Gnome-
panel) works as expected: shadows except on the Gnome-panel. Using any
 !any seems to have the same effect: shadows except on the Gnome-
panel. any  !class=foobar will shows shadows everywhere any 
!(class=Gnome) will remove shadows from the panel again.

It seems it is prefix matching as any  !(class=Gnome-p) will have the
same effect as any  !(class=Gnome-panel). Why any  !any seems to
also work is beyond me.

I have not yet found a way to disable the shadows on all windows using
the Shadow windows field.

-- 
Can not disable shadows in Window Decoration
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/503797
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 503797] Re: Can not disable shadows in Window Decoration

2010-01-06 Thread A. Bram Neijt
Reading the code [1, line 766], it seems I am just misunderstanding the
option. It seems you can only disable shadows on windows which have no
decoration in the first place. Hence the shadow on the panel is effected
while other shadows are not.

One bug still remains and that is that using an empty string does not
reflect the behavior mentioned by the documentation (!any is different
from ). As compiz is being rewritten to C++, I'm going to try to get
this bug into the won't fix.

Any other users out there trying to get rid of shadows: use an extremely
low opacity and radius as a work-around.

[1]
http://gitweb.compiz.org/?p=compiz/core;a=blob;f=plugins/decoration.c;h=89e71060ac0143d9f224ac30c895bf72208f52d9;hb=03ae274cc3bfb191734881017f7b0cf7b9234abe

-- 
Can not disable shadows in Window Decoration
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/503797
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 503797] Re: Can not disable shadows in Window Decoration

2010-01-06 Thread A. Bram Neijt
I consider this a Won't fix as Compiz is being rewritten in C++. The
option is unclear about only applying to windows without a decoration,
it's description and form will have to be evaluated with the next Compiz
release.

** Changed in: compiz (Ubuntu)
   Status: New = Invalid

-- 
Can not disable shadows in Window Decoration
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/503797
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 341684] Re: nm-applet notifications should have more information for disconnected states

2010-01-06 Thread A. Bram Neijt
This patch does not honor gconf settings:
/apps/nm-applet/disable-connected-notifications
/apps/nm-applet/disable-disconnected-notifications

It should use applet_do_notify_with_pref in combination with
PREF_DISABLE_DISCONNECTED_NOTIFICATIONS instead of applet_do_notify.

Example:
applet_do_notify_with_pref (applet, _(Disconnected),
_(The network connection has been 
disconnected.),
nm-no-connection,

PREF_DISABLE_DISCONNECTED_NOTIFICATIONS);

-- 
nm-applet notifications should have more information for disconnected states
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/341684
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 503436] [NEW] [needs-packaging] autotrash

2010-01-05 Thread A. Bram Neijt
Public bug reported:

* Package name: autotrash
  Version : 0.1.1
  Upstream Author : A. Bram Neijt bne...@gmail.com
* URL : http://www.logfish.net/pr/autotrash/
* License : GPL
  Programming Lang: Python
  Description : A tool to purge files from your trash based on age and/or 
filename

A Python script which will purge files from your trash based on their
age or the amount of free space left on the device. Using regular
expressions it is possible to purge based on filename before continueing
based on age or space left on the device. It depends on the
FreeDesktop.org Trash Info files included in the new GNOME system to
find the correct files and the dates they where deleted.

** Affects: ubuntu
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: needs-packaging

-- 
[needs-packaging] autotrash
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/503436
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 503522] [NEW] New upstream release, 2.0.1

2010-01-05 Thread A. Bram Neijt
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: ccbuild

ccbuild has a new upstream release and a new homepage location.

The new 2.0.1 release is available at http://www.logfish.net/pr/ccbuild/

** Affects: ccbuild (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Assignee: A. Bram Neijt (bneijt)
 Status: In Progress

** Changed in: ccbuild (Ubuntu)
   Status: New = In Progress

** Changed in: ccbuild (Ubuntu)
 Assignee: (unassigned) = A. Bram Neijt (bneijt)

-- 
New upstream release, 2.0.1
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/503522
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 503522] Re: New upstream release, 2.0.1

2010-01-05 Thread A. Bram Neijt
This new diff contains is for 2.0.1-0ubuntu1

  * New upstream release (LP: #503522)
  * Moved to CDBS, compatability level now 7
  * Added -std=c++0x, now required by bobcat

 -- A. Bram Neijt bne...@gmail.com  Tue, 05 Jan 2010 21:26:52 +0100


** Attachment added: The debian diff for 2.0.1 using CDBS
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/37461815/ccbuild_2.0.1-0ubuntu1.diff.gz

-- 
New upstream release, 2.0.1
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/503522
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 495159] [NEW] Fatal: GCJ (GNU Compiler for Java) is not supported by JRuby.

2009-12-10 Thread A. Bram Neijt
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: jruby1.2

JRuby does not work after installation, I consider this a problem with
the package dependencies. After installing it succesfully, calling jRuby
will report the message:

Fatal: GCJ (GNU Compiler for Java) is not supported by JRuby.

** Affects: jruby1.2 (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

** Affects: jruby1.2 (Debian)
 Importance: Unknown
 Status: Unknown

** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #538788
   http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=538788

** Also affects: jruby1.2 (Debian) via
   http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=538788
   Importance: Unknown
   Status: Unknown

-- 
Fatal: GCJ (GNU Compiler for Java) is not supported by JRuby.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/495159
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 470651] Re: window list applet does not show windows from both monitors

2009-11-22 Thread A. Bram Neijt
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 412789 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/412789

** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 412789
   The window selector menu in the panel randomly fails to show some of my open 
windows. Also, when waking from a sleeping state, the panel does not update, so 
my clock tells the wrong time, etc.

-- 
window list applet does not show windows from both monitors
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/470651
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 450981] Re: iwlagn 0000:03:00.0: Can not allocate SKB buffers

2009-11-21 Thread A. Bram Neijt
I only seem to get this problem as soon as I hit a memory spike (usually with 
Firefox), then I get a bunch of swap built up, iwlagn will start saying:
[181706.508110] iwlagn :03:00.0: Can not allocate SKB buffers
[181706.508110] swapper: page allocation failure. order:2, mode:0x4020
[181706.508110] Pid: 0, comm: swapper Tainted: G C 2.6.31-14-generic 
#48-Ubuntu
[181706.508110] Call Trace:
[181706.508110]  IRQ  [810e083c] __alloc_pages_slowpath+0x4cc/0x4e0
[181706.508110]  [810e099e] __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x14e/0x150
[181706.508110]  [8dfa] kmalloc_large_node+0x5a/0xb0
[181706.508110]  [81115fa5] __kmalloc_node_track_caller+0x135/0x180
[181706.508110]  [a0286899] ? iwl_rx_allocate+0x1a9/0x230 [iwlcore]
[181706.508110]  [8142e41b] __alloc_skb+0x7b/0x180
[181706.508110]  [a0286899] iwl_rx_allocate+0x1a9/0x230 [iwlcore]
[181706.508110]  [8106b933] ? mod_timer+0x103/0x160
[181706.508110]  [a0287c36] iwl_rx_replenish_now+0x16/0x30 [iwlcore]
[181706.508110]  [a02a44f8] iwl_rx_handle+0x288/0x2f0 [iwlagn]
[181706.508110]  [a02a4767] iwl_irq_tasklet_legacy+0x207/0x440 
[iwlagn]
[181706.508110]  [8107c29b] ? hrtimer_get_next_event+0xbb/0xf0
[181706.508110]  [81063ee0] tasklet_action+0xd0/0xe0
[181706.508110]  [8106549d] __do_softirq+0xbd/0x200
[181706.508110]  [810131ec] call_softirq+0x1c/0x30
[181706.508110]  [81014bc5] do_softirq+0x55/0x90
[181706.508110]  [81065205] irq_exit+0x85/0x90
[181706.508110]  [81014100] do_IRQ+0x70/0xe0
[181706.508110]  [81012a13] ret_from_intr+0x0/0x11
[181706.508110]  EOI  [812d7ed9] ? acpi_idle_enter_bm+0x28b/0x2bf
[181706.508110]  [812d7ed2] ? acpi_idle_enter_bm+0x284/0x2bf
[181706.508110]  [813fe40b] ? cpuidle_idle_call+0x9b/0xf0
[181706.508110]  [81010e12] ? cpu_idle+0xb2/0x100
[181706.508110]  [81514c56] ? rest_init+0x66/0x70
[181706.508110]  [8183a047] ? start_kernel+0x352/0x35b
[181706.508110]  [8183959a] ? x86_64_start_reservations+0x125/0x129
[181706.508110]  [81839698] ? x86_64_start_kernel+0xfa/0x109
[181706.508110] Mem-Info:
[181706.508110] Node 0 DMA per-cpu:
[181706.508110] CPU0: hi:0, btch:   1 usd:   0
[181706.508110] CPU1: hi:0, btch:   1 usd:   0
[181706.508110] Node 0 DMA32 per-cpu:
[181706.508110] CPU0: hi:  186, btch:  31 usd: 104
[181706.508110] CPU1: hi:  186, btch:  31 usd:  77
[181706.508110] Active_anon:285907 active_file:35149 inactive_anon:95722
[181706.508110]  inactive_file:33632 unevictable:4 dirty:26710 writeback:437 
unstable:0
[181706.508110]  free:3269 slab:22972 mapped:15303 pagetables:8144 bounce:0
[181706.508110] Node 0 DMA free:7876kB min:40kB low:48kB high:60kB 
active_anon:1772kB inactive_anon:2148kB active_file:1188kB inactive_file:984kB 
unevictable:0kB present:15332kB pages_scanned:0 all_unreclaimable? no
[181706.508110] lowmem_reserve[]: 0 1963 1963 1963
[181706.508110] Node 0 DMA32 free:5200kB min:5648kB low:7060kB high:8472kB 
active_anon:1141856kB inactive_anon:380740kB active_file:139408kB 
inactive_file:133544kB unevictable:16kB present:2010592kB pages_scanned:1300 
all_unreclaimable? no
[181706.508110] lowmem_reserve[]: 0 0 0 0
[181706.508110] Node 0 DMA: 25*4kB 10*8kB 23*16kB 37*32kB 28*64kB 10*128kB 
4*256kB 0*512kB 0*1024kB 1*2048kB 0*4096kB = 7876kB
[181706.508110] Node 0 DMA32: 1034*4kB 9*8kB 0*16kB 1*32kB 1*64kB 1*128kB 
1*256kB 1*512kB 0*1024kB 0*2048kB 0*4096kB = 5200kB
[181706.508110] 147806 total pagecache pages
[181706.508110] 27280 pages in swap cache
[181706.508110] Swap cache stats: add 624512, delete 597232, find 
4209959/4259844
[181706.508110] Free swap  = 5190824kB
[181706.508110] Total swap = 5919912kB
[181706.508110] 513712 pages RAM
[181706.508110] 9742 pages reserved
[181706.508110] 155236 pages shared
[181706.508110] 397990 pages non-shared
[181706.508110] iwlagn :03:00.0: Can not allocate SKB buffers
b...@owl:~/program/public_html/vserver/perqa/perqa.com/perqa$

And iwlagn will get stuck at a 100% CPU. I'm currently using Ubuntu
Karmic with the newest updates. I have not found a way to reproduce it
easily, so it may very well be a race condition.

-- 
iwlagn :03:00.0: Can not allocate SKB buffers
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/450981
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 305927] Re: gedit leaks memory

2009-11-21 Thread A. Bram Neijt
I've got a git checkout and rand valgrind, the leaks that are definite 
according to valgrind:
libio (from glib)
launchpadintegration bug #483610 
glibc nns (g_option_context_parse)
libfontconfig in a call of FcConfigParseAndLoad XML_ParseBuffer
from g_type_create_instance into fontconfig
g_object_newv into fontconfig

It seems like there is a leak in pango, libio and launchpadintegration
and gedit using them all to leak as fast as it can :)

** Attachment added: valgrind_log.txt.gz
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/35933511/valgrind_log.txt.gz

-- 
gedit leaks memory
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/305927
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 418017] Re: strange warning on python-support

2009-11-03 Thread A. Bram Neijt
I've changed /usr/sbin/update-python-modules to get more information out of the 
warning:
for package in public_packages:
  if srcfile in public_packages[package]:
if py not in public_packages[package].pyversions:
  debug(remove +abspath)
  os.remove(abspath)
  removed = True
break
else:
  warning(WARNING: %s is linked (from %s) but does not belong to any 
package. % (srcfile, abspath))

And it now shows
WARNING: WARNING: /usr/share/pyshared/lsb_release.py is linked (from 
/usr/lib/pymodules/python2.6/lsb_release.py) but does not belong to any package.

I think the problem is that the lsb_release.py is not mentioned in a
.private or .public file described in http://svn.debian.org/viewsvn
/collab-maint/deb-maint/python-support/trunk/README

I don't know how to fix this, but for the people who know about
packaging python modules, creating a python-support module description
file should be an easy fix?

Hope this comment helps to speed this fix up (a.k.a. my 2 cents).

-- 
strange warning on python-support
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/418017
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 452980] Re: empathy keeps changing my status to available without my consent

2009-10-20 Thread A. Bram Neijt
** Bug watch added: GNOME Bug Tracker #599077
   https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=599077

** Also affects: empathy via
   https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=599077
   Importance: Unknown
   Status: Unknown

-- 
empathy keeps changing my status to available without my consent
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/452980
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 403564] Re: Incorrect battery recall warning for Lenovo T61

2009-10-20 Thread A. Bram Neijt
1) I reset the parameter gconftool -u 
/apps/gnome-power-manager/notify/perhaps_recall
The recall message came back again after a reboot.
2) I downloaded the rules file. I began with
MD5 27e7f10f85cce16411e20af5437fe956  
/lib/udev/rules.d/95-devkit-power-battery-recall-ibm.rules
And after the copy I had
6cad53b74ceb0115ee732a6505cebdab  
/lib/udev/rules.d/95-devkit-power-battery-recall-ibm.rules
3) I reset the key again
gconftool -u /apps/gnome-power-manager/notify/perhaps_recall
4) After a reboot I did not get a battery recall message again.

It's fixed for me!

-- 
Incorrect battery recall warning for Lenovo T61
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/403564
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 403564] Re: Incorrect battery recall warning for Lenovo T61

2009-10-02 Thread A. Bram Neijt
$ hexdump -C /sys/class/dmi/id/product_name
  36 34 36 36 39 4d 47 0a   |64669MG.|
0008

I'm not really sure when I last saw the battery reccall message, but I
told it to not show it again and that worked for me (in karmic with the
latest updates).

All hardware is still the same, so the data should still match.

-- 
Incorrect battery recall warning for Lenovo T61
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/403564
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 432451] [NEW] Last.fm (audioscrobbler) plugin not working

2009-09-18 Thread A. Bram Neijt
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: quodlibet

The Last.fm plugin of Quod Libet reports the following error in Karmic:
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File 
/usr/lib/python2.6/dist-packages/quodlibet/plugins/events/lastfmsubmit.py, 
line 12, in module
import lastfm.client, lastfm.marshaller
  File /usr/lib/python2.6/dist-packages/quodlibet/__init__.py, line 126, in 
import_ql
old_import(quodlibet. + module, *args, **kwargs)
ImportError: No module named lastfm.client

The module referred to could be lastfmsubmitd which contains
/usr/share/pyshared/lastfm/client.py but installing this package will
set up a deamon to do last FM submission. It is not clear to me why the
deamon is needed if the python interface should fix it all.

Installing lastfmsubmitd fixes the problem, but also enables a daemon to
be started up which is not used.

** Affects: quodlibet (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
Last.fm (audioscrobbler) plugin not working
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/432451
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 432451] Re: Last.fm (audioscrobbler) plugin not working

2009-09-18 Thread A. Bram Neijt
This bug was posted because of confusion between the audioscrobbler
plugin and the last.fm plugin.

The audioscrobbler plugin is probably obsolete as audioscrobbler moved
to last.fm. It now seems that the only way to use last.fm with
quodlibet, you need to install the submission deamon from lastfmsubmitd.
This seems to force the use of a single system-wide user account for
last.fm, which is nolonger set up from within quod-libet.

** Changed in: quodlibet (Ubuntu)
   Status: New = Invalid

-- 
Last.fm (audioscrobbler) plugin not working
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/432451
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 331099] Re: totem plugin wont play sound on mywoot.net

2009-08-26 Thread A. Bram Neijt
Clicking test, as suggested in the report, works perfectly with me on
Karmic, 64 bit, Firefox 3.5, totem 2.27.2-0ubuntu4. I can't reproduce
this bug on Karmic at this moment.

-- 
totem plugin wont play sound on mywoot.net
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/331099
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 414453] [NEW] Removing .cache/ubuntuone creates useless conflicts

2009-08-16 Thread A. Bram Neijt
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: ubuntuone-client

Playing around with Ubuntu one I decided to remove the .cache/ubuntuone
directory. Here is what I did:

1. Create files:
touch ~/'Ubuntu One/My Files/'test.txt
echo hello  ~/'Ubuntu One/My Files/'hello.txt
2. Wait for the client to sync, verify it on the web. The client icon should 
stop rotating
3. Choose Quit from the context menu of the tray icon.
4. Remove the .cache directory of ubuntuone:
rm -rf ~/.cache/ubuntuone
5. Restart the client using the Applications menu.

Result: The client will start working and create conflict files for all the 
files you have online. These files will be exactly the same as the files that 
are already in your directory, but with a .u1conflict added: md5sum *
d41d8cd98f00b204e9800998ecf8427e test.txt
d41d8cd98f00b204e9800998ecf8427e test.txt.u1conflict
b1946ac92492d2347c6235b4d2611184  hello.txt
b1946ac92492d2347c6235b4d2611184  hello.txt.u1conflict

Expected result: The client will realize that it is useless to create
conflict files for two files with exactly the same content, size and
permissions and not create these conflict files.

ProblemType: Bug
.home.bram..cache.ubuntuone.log.syncdaemon.exceptions.log:
 2009-08-16 17:08:26,338 - ubuntuone.SyncDaemon.ActionQueue - ERROR - upload
   share:''   
node:'7dc67f9f-bcfb-48ab-9e19-810e2b033bde'   
upload(node='7dc67f9f-bcfb-48ab-9e19-810e2b033bde', 
hash='sha1:6f2e550a0dc5c0f489bfd08ff506878f40b9de1b', fileobj_factory='bound 
method FSKey.open_file of ubuntuone.syncdaemon.sync.FSKey object at 
0x22c1910', share='', crc32='147532922L', previous_hash='', size='18') 
failed 7dc67f9f-bcfb-48ab-9e19-810e2b033bde
 2009-08-16 17:08:27,001 - ubuntuone.SyncDaemon.ActionQueue - ERROR - upload
   share:''   
node:'8124a9b3-daac-4c33-b97b-60fa84d407bc'   
upload(node='8124a9b3-daac-4c33-b97b-60fa84d407bc', 
hash='sha1:da39a3ee5e6b4b0d3255bfef95601890afd80709', fileobj_factory='bound 
method FSKey.open_file of ubuntuone.syncdaemon.sync.FSKey object at 
0x22c1b90', share='', crc32='0', previous_hash='', size='0') failed 
8124a9b3-daac-4c33-b97b-60fa84d407bc
 2009-08-16 17:08:27,573 - ubuntuone.SyncDaemon.ActionQueue - ERROR - upload
   share:''   
node:'e39248fb-55af-45e9-886f-fb2b980484f0'   
upload(node='e39248fb-55af-45e9-886f-fb2b980484f0', 
hash='sha1:da39a3ee5e6b4b0d3255bfef95601890afd80709', fileobj_factory='bound 
method FSKey.open_file of ubuntuone.syncdaemon.sync.FSKey object at 
0x22c1850', share='', crc32='0', previous_hash='', size='0') failed 
e39248fb-55af-45e9-886f-fb2b980484f0
Architecture: amd64
Date: Sun Aug 16 17:12:50 2009
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.10
Package: ubuntuone-client 0.92.0-0ubuntu1
PackageArchitecture: all
ProcEnviron:
 SHELL=/bin/bash
 PATH=(custom, user)
 LANG=en_US.UTF-8
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.31-5.24-generic
SourcePackage: ubuntuone-client
Uname: Linux 2.6.31-5-generic x86_64

** Affects: ubuntuone-client (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug

-- 
Removing .cache/ubuntuone creates useless conflicts
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/414453
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 414453] Re: Removing .cache/ubuntuone creates useless conflicts

2009-08-16 Thread A. Bram Neijt

** Attachment added: .home.bram..cache.ubuntuone.log.oauth.login.log.txt
   
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/30392571/.home.bram..cache.ubuntuone.log.oauth.login.log.txt

** Attachment added: .home.bram..cache.ubuntuone.log.syncdaemon.log.txt
   
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/30392573/.home.bram..cache.ubuntuone.log.syncdaemon.log.txt

** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/30392574/Dependencies.txt

** Attachment added: UbuntuoneClientPackages.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/30392575/UbuntuoneClientPackages.txt

-- 
Removing .cache/ubuntuone creates useless conflicts
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/414453
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 277309] Re: Missing suspend icon with non-human theme

2009-08-12 Thread A. Bram Neijt
I've seen this bug all through Jaunty and the development releases of karmic, 
I'm still seeing the bug in Karmic at this date.
gnome-session: 2.27.5-0ubuntu1

-- 
Missing suspend icon with non-human theme
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/277309
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 407491] Re: [karmic] gnome-power-preferences not storing settings

2009-08-06 Thread A. Bram Neijt
The settings are off-by-one for me, and it looks like storing the settings 
work. And the settings take effect as soon as they are set. Your log showed:
TI:17:26:54 TH:0x207f070FI:gpm-prefs-core.c 
FN:gpm_prefs_action_combo_changed_cb,267
 - Changing /apps/gnome-power-manager/buttons/lid_battery to blank

Which means that you have set the lid closed when on battery to blank. Start 
gnome-power-preferences with --verbose again and try every entry in the 
pull-down list. If your bug is the same as mine, the verbose output will show 
that the preferences manager will set the option just above the one you choose. 
Just to make this clear, my findings are:
1) What --verbose output is set, and stored/retained. If you then close the 
preferences manager it will work properly according to what the output told you 
(not what the GUI shows).
2) As soon as you open gnome-power-preferences, it resets the options (shown in 
verbose) to new values which are again wrongly shown in the GUI. Closing it 
after that will have changed your settings even if you didn't do anything.

I'm using 64bit with the latest updates (2.27.5-0ubuntu1). I tried
installing 64bit karmic alpha 3 in KVM and this did not confirm the bug.
However, KVM did not have suspend and hibernate options, so it may be a
problem with the insertion of the extra options, or a wrong enumeration
value??

-- 
[karmic] gnome-power-preferences not storing settings
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/407491
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 407491] Re: [karmic] gnome-power-preferences not storing settings

2009-08-06 Thread A. Bram Neijt
2.27.5-0ubuntu2~ppa4 did not solve the problem for me. Here is what I have for 
On Battery Power, When battery power is critically low.
From Combobox to verbose result
Suspend - suspend
Hibernate - blank
Shutdown - hibernate

This was just after an gconftool-2 --recursive-unset /apps/gnome-power-
manager, which does seem to effect everything in the listing, but does
not solve anything. Also, please let me know if you think having pushed
Make default before Karmic started, could be of any influence in this.

Thanks for the quick uptake!

-- 
[karmic] gnome-power-preferences not storing settings
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/407491
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 407491] Re: [karmic] gnome-power-preferences not storing settings

2009-08-01 Thread A. Bram Neijt
Upon futher investigation, settings are stored. The problem was specific to 
which option I choose, the problem is an off by one thing. For On Battery 
Power, Wehn laptop lid is closed the options are:
Blank Screen
Suspend
Hibernate
Shutdown

If I choose Hibernate, --verbose shows
 - Changing /apps/gnome-power-manager/buttons/lid_battery to suspend
choosing shutdown shows hibernate, suspend shows blank, blank shows nothing.

So the option choices are just off-by one and my choice seemed to be
ignored but was really stored as the option above it. Soo, choosing
Hibernate sets it to suspend. This choice is reflected the next time I
open gnome-power-preferences, so it is actually stored. The option box
is just off-by-one. Every time I open the application, it loads the
options, showing what I chooce -1, saving it on close as shown -1 again,
so opening closing, opening will -1 the option also. For some reason
hibernate seems to be a default becuase opening and closing a few times
seems to have it end up with hibernate.

If I set it to hibernate, verifying with --verbose that it actually sets
it to suspend, everything works normaly. So the option is stored and
acted upon correctly. This bug is merely an interface problem.

-- 
[karmic] gnome-power-preferences not storing settings
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/407491
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 407491] [NEW] [karmic] gnome-power-preferences not storing settings

2009-07-31 Thread A. Bram Neijt
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: gnome-power-manager

Actions:
Open gnome-power-preferences
Change settings
Close gnome-power-preferences

Result:
Power management does not follow the set options. Opening the preference window 
again, shows the settings according to some default and do not reflect the 
choices I made earlier.

Expected result:
The settings should have been stored in the configuration.

The attached log shows the output of:
gnome-power-preferences --verbose  attached_file.log
gnome-power-preferences --verbose  attached_file.log

It seems like the settings are not properly stored and/or reset on
opening the application.

ProblemType: Bug
Architecture: amd64
Date: Fri Jul 31 22:29:36 2009
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.10
Package: gnome-power-manager 2.27.2+git20090729-0ubuntu2
ProcEnviron:
 SHELL=/bin/bash
 PATH=(custom, user)
 LANG=en_US.UTF-8
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.31-4.23-generic
SourcePackage: gnome-power-manager
Uname: Linux 2.6.31-4-generic x86_64

** Affects: gnome-power-manager (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug

-- 
[karmic] gnome-power-preferences not storing settings
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/407491
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 407491] Re: [karmic] gnome-power-preferences not storing settings

2009-07-31 Thread A. Bram Neijt

** Attachment added: Log showing the output of running gnome-power-preferences 
--verbose two times
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/29759981/gnome-power-preferences_verbose.log

** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/29759983/Dependencies.txt

** Attachment added: DevkitPower.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/29759984/DevkitPower.txt

** Attachment added: GConfNonDefault.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/29759985/GConfNonDefault.txt

** Attachment added: gnome-power-bugreport.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/29759986/gnome-power-bugreport.txt

-- 
[karmic] gnome-power-preferences not storing settings
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/407491
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 404328] [NEW] Ubuntu firefox add-on does not show default homepage in new tabs

2009-07-24 Thread A. Bram Neijt
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: ubufox

I've set my default homepage to about:blank, which works for new
windows. But opening a new tab in Firefox will show the default Ubuntu
search page.

To reproduce:
- Install ubufox (0.8~a1-0ubuntu1)
- Set your default homepage using Edit-Preferences
- Open a new tab.

Result:
The Ubuntu-Google partnership/monotizing search shows up.

Expected :
Show my default homepage, as set by Preferences.

Description:Ubuntu karmic (development branch)
Release:9.10
Linux 2.6.31-3-generic #19-Ubuntu SMP Tue Jul 14 16:07:02 UTC 2009 x86_64 
GNU/Linux

** Affects: ubufox (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
Ubuntu firefox add-on does not show default homepage in new tabs
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/404328
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 404328] Re: Ubuntu firefox add-on does not show default homepage in new tabs

2009-07-24 Thread A. Bram Neijt
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 403246 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/403246

Wrongly files under ubufox, this problem is caused by the Multisearch
add-on of Firefox 3.0

** Package changed: ubufox (Ubuntu) = firefox-3.0 (Ubuntu)

** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 403246
   multisearch - please restore old NEWTAB

-- 
Ubuntu firefox add-on does not show default homepage in new tabs
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/404328
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 403564] [NEW] Incorrect recall warning for Lenovo T61

2009-07-23 Thread A. Bram Neijt
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: gnome-power-manager

I've got a Lenovo battery with:
ASM P/N: 92P1142
FRU P/N: 92P1141
(top right corner of label)

So, I get a recall warning pointing me to the website[1]. I can't run
the automated checking system, so I called support. Turns out: there is
no recall. The problem is that I have a Lenovo T61 and the T61 is not in
the list of machines for which the battery is recalled. Also, 14 moths
is more then 12 so it's not in warranty either :(

My feelings aside, on to the bug: if the battery is seen inside a T61,
it is not being recalled, only if it is seen in another model. I'm not
sure how that works, but it probably has something to do with the
shipping dates of these models?

[1]
http://www-307.ibm.com/pc/support/site.wss/document.do?sitestyle=lenovolndocid
=BATT-LENOVO

** Affects: gnome-power-manager (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
Incorrect recall warning for Lenovo T61
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/403564
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 403564] Re: Incorrect recall warning for Lenovo T61

2009-07-23 Thread A. Bram Neijt
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 402287 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/402287

I personally do not consider this a duplicate. Not being able to hide
the recall message, and the recall message being wrong (not contain the
correct information as the battery is not being recalled) are two
different problems.

-- 
Incorrect recall warning for Lenovo T61
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/403564
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 403564]

2009-07-23 Thread A. Bram Neijt

** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/29434525/Dependencies.txt

-- 
Incorrect recall warning for Lenovo T61
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/403564
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 403564]

2009-07-23 Thread A. Bram Neijt

** Attachment added: gnome-power-bugreport.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/29434530/gnome-power-bugreport.txt

** Changed in: gnome-power-manager (Ubuntu)
   Status: Incomplete = New

** Tags added: apport-collected

-- 
Incorrect recall warning for Lenovo T61
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/403564
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 403564]

2009-07-23 Thread A. Bram Neijt

** Attachment added: GConfNonDefault.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/29434527/GConfNonDefault.txt

-- 
Incorrect recall warning for Lenovo T61
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/403564
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 403564]

2009-07-23 Thread A. Bram Neijt

** Attachment added: DevkitPower.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/29434526/DevkitPower.txt

-- 
Incorrect recall warning for Lenovo T61
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/403564
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 403564] apport-collect data

2009-07-23 Thread A. Bram Neijt
Architecture: amd64
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.10
Package: gnome-power-manager 2.27.2-0ubuntu2
PackageArchitecture: amd64
ProcEnviron:
 SHELL=/bin/bash
 PATH=(custom, user)
 LANG=en_US.UTF-8
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.31-3.19-generic
Uname: Linux 2.6.31-3-generic x86_64
UserGroups: adm admin audio cdrom dialout dip floppy fuse kvm lpadmin plugdev 
sambashare video

-- 
Incorrect recall warning for Lenovo T61
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/403564
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 354759] Re: nautilus crashed with SIGSEGV in strlen()

2009-04-03 Thread A. Bram Neijt
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 353741 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/353741


** Attachment added: CoreDump.gz
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24768183/CoreDump.gz

** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24768184/Dependencies.txt

** Attachment added: Disassembly.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24768185/Disassembly.txt

** Attachment added: ProcMaps.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24768186/ProcMaps.txt

** Attachment added: ProcStatus.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24768187/ProcStatus.txt

** Attachment added: Registers.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24768188/Registers.txt

** Attachment added: Stacktrace.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24768189/Stacktrace.txt

** Attachment added: ThreadStacktrace.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24768190/ThreadStacktrace.txt

** Visibility changed to: Public

** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 353741
   nautilus crashed with SIGSEGV in strlen()

-- 
nautilus crashed with SIGSEGV in strlen()
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/354759
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 353741] Re: nautilus crashed with SIGSEGV in strlen()

2009-04-02 Thread A. Bram Neijt

** Attachment added: CoreDump.gz
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24687469/CoreDump.gz

** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24687470/Dependencies.txt

** Attachment added: Disassembly.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24687471/Disassembly.txt

** Attachment added: ProcMaps.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24687472/ProcMaps.txt

** Attachment added: ProcStatus.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24687473/ProcStatus.txt

** Attachment added: Registers.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24687474/Registers.txt

** Attachment added: Stacktrace.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24687475/Stacktrace.txt

** Attachment added: ThreadStacktrace.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24687476/ThreadStacktrace.txt

** Visibility changed to: Public

-- 
nautilus crashed with SIGSEGV in strlen()
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/353741
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 334540] Re: anonymous ftp PASS command sent without argument

2009-02-26 Thread A. Bram Neijt
** Bug watch added: GNOME Bug Tracker #533219
   http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=533219

** Also affects: gvfs via
   http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=533219
   Importance: Unknown
   Status: Unknown

-- 
anonymous ftp PASS command sent without argument
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/334540
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 334540] [NEW] anonymous ftp PASS command sent without argument

2009-02-25 Thread A. Bram Neijt
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: gvfs

When connecting to an anonymous FTP account on an FTP server, the gvfs-
backend for ftp does not send an argument with the PASS command. This
means that for any RFC959 compliant server will not allow the anonymous
entry and send back an error message (501 Syntax error: command (PASS)
needs an argument.)

If the server allows for PASS without an argument (against RFC959)
everything will be ok, and the anonymous ftp will be mounted without any
problem.

When does this happen: always, when connecting with an anonymous FTP
server using nautilus.

To reproduce it (this is just how I came across it):
- Install pyftpdlib from my ppa: https://launchpad.net/~bneijt/+archive/ppa
  or download it from http://code.google.com/p/pyftpdlib/
- Download an older version of shareftp [1]
- Run shareftp -a (make sure you have python-avahi installed)
- Browse to the ShareFTP share under Network in Nautilus.

[1]
http://git.logfish.net/?p=shareftp.git;a=blob;f=shareftp;h=45353b6bee141e4d88f367a2da1ddff6b975e252;hb=be76787aef89a14a4e0ba1cf9fe41eb82c194720

ProblemType: Bug
Architecture: amd64
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.04
Package: gvfs-backends 1.1.6-0ubuntu2
ProcEnviron:
 SHELL=/bin/bash
 PATH=(custom, user)
 LANG=en_US.UTF-8
SourcePackage: gvfs
Uname: Linux 2.6.28-8-generic x86_64

** Affects: gvfs (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug

-- 
anonymous ftp PASS command sent without argument
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/334540
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 334540] Re: anonymous ftp PASS command sent without argument

2009-02-25 Thread A. Bram Neijt

** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/23129437/Dependencies.txt

-- 
anonymous ftp PASS command sent without argument
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/334540
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 321398] [NEW] Convert nolonger handles SVG files correctly, bad output

2009-01-26 Thread A. Bram Neijt
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: imagemagick

Previously convert file.svg file.png would work correctly, however,
recently this has been broken in Jaunty. The output is a valid PNG file
but the rendering does not correctly work.

The input file is valid SVG and correctly handled by eog, which can also
be used as a work-around (File-Save As... file.png).

ProblemType: Bug
Architecture: amd64
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.04
Package: imagemagick 7:6.4.5.4.dfsg1-1ubuntu3
ProcEnviron:
 SHELL=/bin/bash
 PATH=(custom, user)
 LANG=en_US.UTF-8
SourcePackage: imagemagick
Uname: Linux 2.6.28-5-generic x86_64

** Affects: imagemagick (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: apport-bug

-- 
Convert nolonger handles SVG files correctly, bad output
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/321398
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 321398] Re: Convert nolonger handles SVG files correctly, bad output

2009-01-26 Thread A. Bram Neijt
The broken output shows some resemblance with the input, is definitely
broken.


** Attachment added: The output of convert file.svg file.png
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/21640464/as3_erorr_ext.png

-- 
Convert nolonger handles SVG files correctly, bad output
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/321398
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 321398] Re: Convert nolonger handles SVG files correctly, bad output

2009-01-26 Thread A. Bram Neijt

** Attachment added: The SVG file which convert cannot handle but could 
earlier
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/21640442/as3_error_ext.svg

** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/21640443/Dependencies.txt

-- 
Convert nolonger handles SVG files correctly, bad output
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/321398
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 321398] Re: Convert nolonger handles SVG files correctly, bad output

2009-01-26 Thread A. Bram Neijt
A commandline work-around for automating this is the following:

gst-launch filesrc location=as3_error_ext.svg ! gdkpixbufdec ! pngenc !
filesink location=as3_error_ext.png

(replacing the location= parameter values with the right files of
course)

-- 
Convert nolonger handles SVG files correctly, bad output
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/321398
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 315356] Re: No ffmpeg2theora binary in jaunty package

2009-01-25 Thread A. Bram Neijt
Anybody having trouble with this:
If you need the command-line, try the linux binary from the ffmpeg homepage: 
http://v2v.cc/~j/ffmpeg2theora/download.html
Otherwise, try OggConvert which is in the repositories (universe/sound)

-- 
No ffmpeg2theora binary in jaunty package
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/315356
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 269986] Re: gedit open in all workspaces

2009-01-22 Thread A. Bram Neijt
Ah, I think I found the problem then, unmarking it is not saved because
gedit core-dumps every time you close it. So it probably doesn't save
the preferences because of the core-dump then.

This should be fixed as soon as the core-dump is fixed.


** Attachment added: Gedit core dump
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/21531999/core-dumplog.txt

-- 
gedit open in all workspaces
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/269986
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 269986] Re: gedit open in all workspaces

2009-01-20 Thread A. Bram Neijt
This is not a Xubuntu bug. In Jaunty using the plain vanilla Ubuntu
(64bit) and Gnome, starting gedit from a terminal will start it with
Always on visible workspace.

To reproduce:
- Open a gnome-terminal
- Type gedit
- Right click on the window bar of gedit, observe the Workspace visibility 
status

Does this happen all the time? Yes


** Also affects: gedit (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

-- 
gedit open in all workspaces
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/269986
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 269986] Re: gedit open in all workspaces

2009-01-20 Thread A. Bram Neijt
Did you use a 64 bit version of Ubuntu?

I'm using the following, so please try to get as close to this configuration as 
possible:
2.6.28-4-generic #11-Ubuntu SMP Fri Jan 16 21:50:52 UTC 2009 x86_64 GNU/Linux
Package: gedit Version: 2.25.4-0ubuntu1
No compiz installed
Intel GMA965 / X3100 graphics chip and driver
Focus follows mouse
Gnome 2.25.4

To reproduce it, simply start gedit, either from the terminal or the
menu. The bug seems so obvious that I actually thought it would be
removed in a matter of days and did not report it at first.

-- 
gedit open in all workspaces
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/269986
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 95684] Re: [needs-packaging] tuxcmd

2008-12-27 Thread A. Bram Neijt
** Also affects: debian via
   http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=498513
   Importance: Unknown
   Status: Unknown

-- 
[needs-packaging] tuxcmd
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/95684
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


  1   2   >