[Bug 1086475] Re: Sync blcr 0.8.4-3 (universe) from Debian Unstable (universe)
0.8.4-4 should be making its way out to the Debian archives shortly. Probably won't make it into wheezy but it seems to be a non-issue in wheezy currently and pre-emptively fixes an FTBFS in wheezy+1. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1086475 Title: Sync blcr 0.8.4-3 (universe) from Debian Unstable (universe) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/blcr/+bug/1086475/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1086475] Re: Sync blcr 0.8.4-3 (universe) from Debian Unstable (universe)
It built fine on amd64 in a current sid pbuilder prior to upload to Debian. I'll try and find time to take a look at this on an Ubuntu/amd64 box and work out what's going on. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1086475 Title: Sync blcr 0.8.4-3 (universe) from Debian Unstable (universe) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/blcr/+bug/1086475/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 700036] Re: package blcr-dkms 0.8.2-15ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: blcr kernel module failed to build - error: ‘struct signal_struct’ has no member named ‘count’
There's an updated package currently awaiting build in my PPA that adds support for kernels up to and including 2.6.38 (i.e. Natty) - https://launchpad.net/~awoodland/+archive/blcr/+sourcepub/1980069 /+listing-archive-extra It passed all the tests it should on my test machine and is an official upstream release. Maybe this would be a candidate for inclusion in natty-updates? The dediff between the previous version looks bigger than it really is because of a) the autoconf rerun and b) a whole pile of patches that were previously only in Debian got merged upstream. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/700036 Title: package blcr-dkms 0.8.2-15ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: blcr kernel module failed to build - error: ‘struct signal_struct’ has no member named ‘count’ To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/blcr/+bug/700036/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 700036] Re: package blcr-dkms 0.8.2-15ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: blcr kernel module failed to build - error: ‘struct signal_struct’ has no member named ‘count’
2.6.39+ support currently has two known issues: https://hpcrdm.lbl.gov/pipermail/checkpoint/2011-October/000334.html I think they're both things I should be able to handle although the BKL removal has the potential to introduce some hard to debug problems. All going well though it might be possible to get a patch blessed upstream within a few weeks. The Debian upload I made has a reference to this LP bug in the changelog. I guess that'll either need stripping before pulling into Ubuntu or a separate bug for 3.0 support needs to become the master. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/700036 Title: package blcr-dkms 0.8.2-15ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: blcr kernel module failed to build - error: ‘struct signal_struct’ has no member named ‘count’ To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/blcr/+bug/700036/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 804943] Re: blcr kernel module failed to build with kernel 3.0 : configure: error: --with-linux argument '3.0-x' is neither a kernel version string nor a full path
** Changed in: blcr (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) = Alan Woodland (awoodland) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/804943 Title: blcr kernel module failed to build with kernel 3.0 : configure: error: --with-linux argument '3.0-x' is neither a kernel version string nor a full path To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/blcr/+bug/804943/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 700036] Re: package blcr-dkms 0.8.2-15ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: blcr kernel module failed to build - error: ‘struct signal_struct’ has no member named ‘count’
No news yet and the patch in testing only goes to 2.6.35 right now. I have a suspicion the timing will match the next debian freeze so an ubuntu specific patch to break the dependency change probably makes most sense. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/700036 Title: package blcr-dkms 0.8.2-15ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: blcr kernel module failed to build - error: ‘struct signal_struct’ has no member named ‘count’ -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 700036] Re: package blcr-dkms 0.8.2-15ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: blcr kernel module failed to build - error: ‘struct signal_struct’ has no member named ‘count’
On 21 April 2011 17:17, pablomme pablo...@googlemail.com wrote: Could somebody please change the openmpi-bin package dependency on openmpi-checkpoint from recommends to suggests, to stop the flood of duplicates? This is what most commonly pulls blcr-dkms, which is non functional since kernel 2.6.35 and its failing to build causes an error to show up on every attempt to rebuild the dkms modules, which users tend to eventually report. There's about 0.95 reports a day on average (116 duplicates between 18 November and 21 April). libmpich2-2 also pulls it in via its depends on libcr0 - I think this is a mistake, it should be a recommends at most, but preferably a suggests, like for OpenMPI. Neither MPI library needs blcr to work. Why not fix the reporting problem by patching the bug submission tool to check for duplicates? It would be a useful feature more generally in other cases too surely? I have a patch for this, adding support for more recent kernels in testing/development with the upstream authors at the moment, but there are a number of non-trivial changes in code that may have usage cases I'm not aware of or subtle bugs in corner cases so I'm awaiting an ACK from them to proceed. Alan -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/700036 Title: package blcr-dkms 0.8.2-15ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: blcr kernel module failed to build - error: ‘struct signal_struct’ has no member named ‘count’ -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 706321] [NEW] Patch for 2.6.35 kernels
Public bug reported: Linux kernels 2.6.32 moved several include files that are generated automatically from linux/* to generated/*. This patch causes qc-usb- source to look in the appropriate place (and hence build again) on these kernels. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.10 Package: qc-usb-source 0.6.6-7 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.35-24.42-generic-pae 2.6.35.8 Uname: Linux 2.6.35-24-generic-pae i686 NonfreeKernelModules: quickcam nvidia Architecture: i386 Date: Sat Jan 22 15:38:04 2011 InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.04 LTS Lucid Lynx - Release i386 (20100429) PackageArchitecture: all ProcEnviron: LANG=en_GB.utf8 SHELL=/bin/zsh SourcePackage: qc-usb ** Affects: qc-usb (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-bug i386 maverick -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/706321 Title: Patch for 2.6.35 kernels -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 706321] Re: Patch for 2.6.35 kernels
** Patch added: Patch to look in generated/ instead of linux/ for auto generated headers https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/706321/+attachment/1803209/+files/qc-usb-2.6.35.patch -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/706321 Title: Patch for 2.6.35 kernels -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 706321] Re: Patch for 2.6.35 kernels
Turns out this driver is actually pretty redundant (for me at least) since 2.6.29 anyway - gspca_stv06xx seems to support all of the hardware that I have which used to use qc-usb. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/706321 Title: Patch for 2.6.35 kernels -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 555729] Re: package blcr-dkms does not support 2.6.33 or more recent kernels
That would be quite a sensible fix to stem the tide of bug reports in Ubuntu. 0.8.2-14 should fix this for kernels upto and including 2.6.34, however I've not yet managed to fix builds for 2.6.35, so this would be worth having still. -- package blcr-dkms does not support 2.6.33 or more recent kernels https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/555729 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 555729] Re: package blcr-dkms does not support 2.6.33 or more recent kernels
libcr0 will behave sanely if the kernel modules are not available. The extent of this is to return appropriate error codes from API calls though, rather than actually being useful, hence the recommends there. I originally took the view that most MPI users were probably sysadmins setting up clusters etc. and therefore recommends on MPI made sense because this is exactly the kind of thing you want to push out to cluster nodes. I've prepared a new upload for Debian, which adds support for kernels up to an including 2.6.34. I plan to upload it tonight once upstream ACK some of the changes I made. This new release also dropped references to blcr-modules (the package originally targeted m-a, not dkms). -- package blcr-dkms does not support 2.6.33 or more recent kernels https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/555729 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 555729] Re: package blcr-dkms does not support 2.6.33 or more recent kernels
I am testing packages with support for kernels 2.6.35 now. 2.6.35 support is probably someway off still. Since as I understand it the forthcoming release will be using 2.6.35 it probably makes sense to make this change on Ubuntu. Alan -- package blcr-dkms does not support 2.6.33 or more recent kernels https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/555729 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 586875] Re: package blcr-dkms 0.8.2-10 failed to install/upgrade: blcr kernel module failed to build
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 572012 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/572012 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 572012 package blcr-dkms 0.8.2-10 failed to install/upgrade: blcr kernel module failed to build -- package blcr-dkms 0.8.2-10 failed to install/upgrade: blcr kernel module failed to build https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/586875 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 583755] Re: package blcr-dkms 0.8.2-10 failed to install/upgrade: blcr kernel module failed to build
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 572012 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/572012 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 572012 package blcr-dkms 0.8.2-10 failed to install/upgrade: blcr kernel module failed to build -- package blcr-dkms 0.8.2-10 failed to install/upgrade: blcr kernel module failed to build https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/583755 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 609425] Re: package blcr-dkms 0.8.2-13 failed to install/upgrade: blcr kernel module failed to build
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 555729 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/555729 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 555729 package blcr-dkms does not support 2.6.33 or more recent kernels -- package blcr-dkms 0.8.2-13 failed to install/upgrade: blcr kernel module failed to build https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/609425 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 599810] Re: package blcr-dkms 0.8.2-10 failed to install/upgrade: blcr kernel module failed to build
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 572012 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/572012 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 572012 package blcr-dkms 0.8.2-10 failed to install/upgrade: blcr kernel module failed to build -- package blcr-dkms 0.8.2-10 failed to install/upgrade: blcr kernel module failed to build https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/599810 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 595123] Re: package blcr-dkms 0.8.2-10 failed to install/upgrade: blcr kernel module failed to build
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 572012 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/572012 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 572012 package blcr-dkms 0.8.2-10 failed to install/upgrade: blcr kernel module failed to build -- package blcr-dkms 0.8.2-10 failed to install/upgrade: blcr kernel module failed to build https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/595123 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 586875] Re: package blcr-dkms 0.8.2-10 failed to install/upgrade: blcr kernel module failed to build
It looks like you're trying to build for a kernel that's not currently installed. Alan -- package blcr-dkms 0.8.2-10 failed to install/upgrade: blcr kernel module failed to build https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/586875 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 582749] Re: package blcr-dkms 0.8.2-11 failed to install/upgrade: blcr kernel module failed to build
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 555729 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/555729 Kernels newer than 2.6.32 aren't currently supported by BLCR, a fix is in progress however this is proving difficult. There is a Debian bug for this: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=573112 and some discussions on the blcr mailing list. Alan ** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #573112 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=573112 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 555729 package blcr-dkms 0.8.2-10 failed to install/upgrade: blcr kernel module failed to build ** Changed in: blcr (Ubuntu) Status: New = In Progress ** Changed in: blcr (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) = Alan Woodland (awoodland) -- package blcr-dkms 0.8.2-11 failed to install/upgrade: blcr kernel module failed to build https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/582749 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 555729] Re: package blcr-dkms 0.8.2-10 failed to install/upgrade: blcr kernel module failed to build
This is also reported in Debian: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=573112 ** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #573112 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=573112 -- package blcr-dkms 0.8.2-10 failed to install/upgrade: blcr kernel module failed to build https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/555729 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 555729] Re: package blcr-dkms does not support 2.6.33 or more recent kernels
** Summary changed: - package blcr-dkms 0.8.2-10 failed to install/upgrade: blcr kernel module failed to build + package blcr-dkms does not support 2.6.33 or more recent kernels -- package blcr-dkms does not support 2.6.33 or more recent kernels https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/555729 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 572012] Re: package blcr-dkms 0.8.2-10 failed to install/upgrade: blcr kernel module failed to build
From the log it looks like you're trying to build for a kernel which doesn't have the System.map installed - BLCR needs this in order to be able to build. Alan -- package blcr-dkms 0.8.2-10 failed to install/upgrade: blcr kernel module failed to build https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/572012 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 555729] Re: package blcr-dkms 0.8.2-10 failed to install/upgrade: blcr kernel module failed to build
** Changed in: blcr (Ubuntu) Status: New = In Progress ** Changed in: blcr (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) = Alan Woodland (awoodland) -- package blcr-dkms 0.8.2-10 failed to install/upgrade: blcr kernel module failed to build https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/555729 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 555729] [NEW] package blcr-dkms 0.8.2-10 failed to install/upgrade: blcr kernel module failed to build
Hi, blcr is currently known to not work with kernel 2.6.33 or newer. Upstream and I are working on a patch for this but it's non trivial. Alan On 4/5/10, Scott Lockwood w...@lrsehosting.com wrote: Public bug reported: 1) Description: Ubuntu lucid (development branch) Release: 10.04 2) blcr-dkms: Installed: 0.8.2-10 Candidate: 0.8.2-10 Version table: *** 0.8.2-10 0 500 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ lucid/universe Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status 3) The build should have happened automatically at kernel install. 4) Instead, it crashed. ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04 Package: blcr-dkms 0.8.2-10 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-19.28-generic 2.6.32.10+drm33.1 Uname: Linux 2.6.32-19-generic i686 NonfreeKernelModules: openafs nvidia Architecture: i386 Date: Mon Apr 5 08:22:06 2010 ErrorMessage: blcr kernel module failed to build InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 9.10 Karmic Koala - Release i386 (20091028.5) PackageArchitecture: all PackageVersion: 0.8.2-10 SourcePackage: blcr Title: package blcr-dkms 0.8.2-10 failed to install/upgrade: blcr kernel module failed to build ** Affects: blcr (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-package i386 lucid -- package blcr-dkms 0.8.2-10 failed to install/upgrade: blcr kernel module failed to build https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/555729 You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to blcr in ubuntu. Status in “blcr” package in Ubuntu: New Bug description: 1) Description: Ubuntu lucid (development branch) Release: 10.04 2) blcr-dkms: Installed: 0.8.2-10 Candidate: 0.8.2-10 Version table: *** 0.8.2-10 0 500 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ lucid/universe Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status 3) The build should have happened automatically at kernel install. 4) Instead, it crashed. ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04 Package: blcr-dkms 0.8.2-10 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-19.28-generic 2.6.32.10+drm33.1 Uname: Linux 2.6.32-19-generic i686 NonfreeKernelModules: openafs nvidia Architecture: i386 Date: Mon Apr 5 08:22:06 2010 ErrorMessage: blcr kernel module failed to build InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 9.10 Karmic Koala - Release i386 (20091028.5) PackageArchitecture: all PackageVersion: 0.8.2-10 SourcePackage: blcr Title: package blcr-dkms 0.8.2-10 failed to install/upgrade: blcr kernel module failed to build -- Sent from my mobile device -- package blcr-dkms 0.8.2-10 failed to install/upgrade: blcr kernel module failed to build https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/555729 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 534175] Re: package blcr-dkms 0.8.2-9 failed to install/upgrade: blcr kernel module failed to build against linux-rt kernel
It was the Ubuntu freeze I was unsure about. I'm preparing -10 now with the patch for -lp kernels. I've checked up and there shouldn't be a problem for getting the fix pulled across from Debian. Once that hits testing and lucid I'll do another revision which adds an extra package with the testsuite. Alan -- package blcr-dkms 0.8.2-9 failed to install/upgrade: blcr kernel module failed to build against linux-rt kernel https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/534175 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 534175] Re: package blcr-dkms 0.8.2-9 failed to install/upgrade: blcr kernel module failed to build against linux-rt kernel
Of course when I said -lp I really meant -rt... New version has just been uploaded to Debian/Unstable. Will request getting it pulled into Lucid later today. Alan -- package blcr-dkms 0.8.2-9 failed to install/upgrade: blcr kernel module failed to build against linux-rt kernel https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/534175 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 534175] Re: package blcr-dkms 0.8.2-9 failed to install/upgrade: blcr kernel module failed to build against linux-rt kernel
** Changed in: blcr (Ubuntu) Status: In Progress = Fix Committed -- package blcr-dkms 0.8.2-9 failed to install/upgrade: blcr kernel module failed to build against linux-rt kernel https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/534175 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 535187] [NEW] Please sync blcr to Debian/sid main (0.8.2-10)
Public bug reported: Changes: blcr (0.8.2-10) unstable; urgency=low . * Add patch from Paul Hargrove that fixes builds on linux-rt - Fixes build dkms build failure with linux-rt kernels. - Required autoreconf run LP: #534175 * Bump to standards version 3.8.4, no changes needed * Add misc depends for dkms package The current version of blcr in Ubuntu 0.8.2-9 has no Ubuntu specific patches. Thanks, Alan ** Affects: blcr (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Please sync blcr to Debian/sid main (0.8.2-10) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/535187 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 534175] Re: package blcr-dkms 0.8.2-9 failed to install/upgrade: blcr kernel module failed to build against linux-rt kernel
BLCR can in theory build against almost any standard 2.6.X kernel. I have no idea what -rt changes internally though. Do you have a config.log from the failed configure attempt that you could attach to this report? As for nvidia modules not getting built because of this I'd say that was a bug with dkms itself. There's no inherent reason why failure of one module should prevent another one from getting built. The boot time script that causes these to get built is pretty simple from what I remember. Alan -- package blcr-dkms 0.8.2-9 failed to install/upgrade: blcr kernel module failed to build against linux-rt kernel https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/534175 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 534175] Re: package blcr-dkms 0.8.2-9 failed to install/upgrade: blcr kernel module failed to build against linux-rt kernel
From a quick look just now it looks like it should be possible to add support for this branch. I don't have enough time to develop and test this right now though, but I'll forward the report upstream. Alan -- package blcr-dkms 0.8.2-9 failed to install/upgrade: blcr kernel module failed to build against linux-rt kernel https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/534175 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 534175] Re: package blcr-dkms 0.8.2-9 failed to install/upgrade: blcr kernel module failed to build against linux-rt kernel
apt-get source linux-image-2.6.28-3-rt (Oddly this package is at version 2.6.31-9.152) linux-rt appears to be a meta-package which depends upon the latest linux-image-X-rt. I've never looked at the -rt packages until today. -- package blcr-dkms 0.8.2-9 failed to install/upgrade: blcr kernel module failed to build against linux-rt kernel https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/534175 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 534175] Re: package blcr-dkms 0.8.2-9 failed to install/upgrade: blcr kernel module failed to build against linux-rt kernel
I will definitely wait for an ack on the functionality of the resulting patch. Seems odd that it would end up missing those macros. If it works manually it should work with DKMS, all the bits do (in a slightly odd way) is call configure for the appropriate kernel and make, dressed up like a non-autoconf'd module. I can only upload to Debian too, so I don't know right now what the chances of this getting into the upcoming release now it's been frozen would be. I will make inquiries once there's a positive test report from a system (or two) running -rt. Alan -- package blcr-dkms 0.8.2-9 failed to install/upgrade: blcr kernel module failed to build against linux-rt kernel https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/534175 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 534175] Re: package blcr-dkms 0.8.2-9 failed to install/upgrade: blcr kernel module failed to build against linux-rt kernel
** Changed in: blcr (Ubuntu) Status: New = In Progress ** Changed in: blcr (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) = Alan Woodland (awoodland) -- package blcr-dkms 0.8.2-9 failed to install/upgrade: blcr kernel module failed to build against linux-rt kernel https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/534175 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 531255] Re: package blcr-dkms 0.8.2-9 failed to install/upgrade: blcr kernel module failed to build - Segmentation fault (core dumped)
** Changed in: blcr (Ubuntu) Status: New = Invalid -- package blcr-dkms 0.8.2-9 failed to install/upgrade: blcr kernel module failed to build - Segmentation fault (core dumped) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/531255 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 338362] Re: wpa_supplicant wifi connection gets disconnected with tls_connection_handshake
The odd thing is when it fails disabling NM, using wpa_supplicant manually and then re-enabling NM causes NM to work again (reliably too) -- wpa_supplicant wifi connection gets disconnected with tls_connection_handshake https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/338362 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 503185] Re: fails to build on armel/lucid
The fix for this in 0.8.2-9 has hit testing now, so as soon as that gets pulled across... -- fails to build on armel/lucid https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/503185 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 503185] Re: fails to build on armel/lucid
2010/1/18 Dave Martin dave.mar...@arm.com: I get a successful build, but I'm not sure how to run the testsuite. Any ideas? Testsuite needs to be built separately using: ./configure --with-installed-libcr --with-installed-modules make check IIRC. There's a bug in the current release which prevents --with-installed-util from working correctly, which should also be used here, but I don't think it matters too much that it's not. (You'll also need to have the kernel module part (blcr-dkms) installed and built for the running kernel in order for the tests to actually work) Alan -- fails to build on armel/lucid https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/503185 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 503185] Re: fails to build on armel/lucid
2010/1/18 Dave Martin dave.mar...@arm.com: I managed to build the kernel modules against the linux-fsl-imx51 headers and install them; make check then ran, using the configure args you suggest (I added --prefix=/usr --mandir=/usr/share/man for consistency with the package build proper, but I doubt this affects the test results). See the attached log for the results. A couple of tests are skipped; the prctl test fails. The atomics tests appear to pass. That all looks good - bug2524 test is PPC specific, prctl test fails because of known problems with configure and the test itself. I have not currently done anything in my patch to cause R_KCODE___kuser_cmpxchg to be defined: I defined it in my build using a masquerade wrapper around GCC. This will need to be addressed in the build scripts. I have a trivial patch I'm going to apply that assumes this will always be supported. It's the better code path to use, and it's only untrue pre 2.6.12, which isn't a problem for Debian or Ubuntu. I'll upload 0.8.2-8 to Debian now, with a reference in the Changelog to the LP bug. Alan -- fails to build on armel/lucid https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/503185 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 503185] Re: fails to build on armel/lucid
Am I correct in thinking armel for Ubuntu is targeting a different arm varient than armel in Debian then? Any arm gurus know of an easy workaround? It builds fine on armel Debian: https://buildd.debian.org/fetch.cgi?pkg=blcr;ver=0.8.2-7;arch=armel;stamp=1261371421 -- fails to build on armel/lucid https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/503185 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 503185] Re: fails to build on armel/lucid
Further research indicates that SWP has been deprecated and subsequently dropped from the instruction set in newer arm processors: http://www.doulos.com/knowhow/arm/Hints_and_Tips/Implementing_Semaphores/ I'll see about putting together a patch with upstream to correct this. -- fails to build on armel/lucid https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/503185 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 503185] swp/swpne ARMv7
Hi, I noticed today that BLCR is failing to build on armel on Ubuntu. This problem is reported in [1]. It would seem that ARMv7 no longer includes swp/swpne instructions. It's relatively trivial to conditionally replace this with appropriate ldrex/strex instructions instead though. Before I produce a patch though I have a few questions: 1) CR_KCODE___kuser_cmpxchg clearly isn't defined at build time here. The test doesn't get run because we're only building userspace parts at this point. Is that correct? Are we always expecting to be in the #else oflibcr/arch/arm/cr_atomic.h when building userspace bits? I can't help but feel I've missed something in my reading of this somehow though. 2) Is a 2nd alternative for cri_atomic_inc/cri_atomic_dec_and_test/cri_cmp_swap the correct way to fix this? The comments in the source seem to suggest that using ldrex/strex would be correct and better where they exist. They also imply that we shouldn be using __kernel_cmpxchg on newer kernels anyway though. Thanks, Alan [1] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/blcr/+bug/503185 -- fails to build on armel/lucid https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/503185 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 503185] Re: [BLCR-ARM] swp/swpne ARMv7
2010/1/5 Paul H. Hargrove phhargr...@lbl.gov: Alan, I believe you are mistaken in reading the comments to imply we shouldn['t] be using __kernel_cmpxchg on newer kernels anyway. That feature became available in 2.6.12 and before that there was no way to perform an atomic operation from user code w/ pre-ARMv6 hardware. Since 2.6.12 this has been the portable way to get an atomic C-A-S. If there is specific misleading text in the comment, please show me and I'll fix/clarify it. Thanks, my confusion was in how a kernel test seemed to be resulting in something getting called directly from userspace, and why it didn't seem to be getting used in the build despite the more recent kernel. The comments are pretty clear now I see how __kuser_cmpxchg is working. You ARE correct that CR_KCODE___kuser_cmpxchg is not defined at build time IF one does separate configuration as the debian packaging apparently does. That possibility was not considered when this code was first written, and is the root cause of your problem. One should always be in CR_KCODE___kuser_cmpxchg case for a kernel = 2.6.12. It was my intention that the swp/swpne code only be used for kernel 2.6.12, but probing the kernel for __kuser_cmpxchg was chosen to be a more reliable probe (a distro could back port the feature to an older base kernel version). The fact that you reach this code is because the separate user/kernel builds have resulted in not probing for CR_KCODE___kuser_cmpxchg. That makes sense. If one were to refuse to build for a kernel w/o this feature, then the #if defined(CR_KCODE___kuser_cmpxchg) would/could effectively become equivalent to #if 1 since a userspace built w/o a corresponding kernel module is harmless. So, I believe the solution to your problem is to force use of the __kuser_cmpxchg path and require (via packaging magic?) that one have kernel = 2.6.12. That seems like the simplest solution to me, a 1 line patch to force that path on arm. I'm not quite sure how to document = 2.6.12 as a dependency for a library package. Probably the easiest way to get a sensible dependency would be to depend on a more modern libc6 than the automatically generated one. Ubuntu arm people: Shall I just do this and upload to Debian/unstable with LP: #503185 in the changelog? It makes sense for the Debian userspace to be using __kuser_cmpxchg on modern kernels also. (I assume on a kernel prior to 2.6.12 this would build, but give segfault/bus error at run time?) I am open to suggestions as to how to deal in general with building the ARMuser space w/o configuring the kernel module, while still allowing for the possibility of a pre-2.6.12 kernel. I am not certain that disallowing pre-2.6.12 kernels would be popular in the ARM community. For Debian/Ubuntu I think it's safe enough to ignore that problem - Sarge was the last Debian release to see a kernel 2.6.12, the next Ubuntu release looks set to have at least 2.6.32 as the default kernel. In response to your #2: one COULD write an additional #if case to use ldrex/strex for ARMv6 and ARMv7. This would gain some efficiency in exchange for portability to older CPUs, but I lack a platform to test correctness of such an implementation. I have an ARMv6 on my desk at the moment, but it's not supported by any of the standard Debian/Ubuntu kernel packages to my knowledge and I've never tried anything much more adventurous on it than a Debian chroot. I don't think it's worth the time/effort to do this given that it's better handled by __kuser_cmpxchg anyway. Alan -- fails to build on armel/lucid https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/503185 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 502261] Re: package blcr-dkms 0.8.2-7 failed to install/upgrade: blcr kernel module failed to build
Looks like you're missing the linux-headers-`uname -r` package perhaps? -- package blcr-dkms 0.8.2-7 failed to install/upgrade: blcr kernel module failed to build https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/502261 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 433189] Re: snd-hda-intel: spurious response messages in dmesg - causes crackle
I have the same problem on an acer aspire 751. Changing /etc/modprobe.d/alsa-base.conf from the default: options snd-hda-intel power_save=10 power_save_controller=N to: options snd-hda-intel model=acer Seems to make the error go away. -- snd-hda-intel: spurious response messages in dmesg - causes crackle https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/433189 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
