[Bug 1967479] Re: snaps lost connections during 22.04 upgrade
Here's my log since 2022-03-31 ** Attachment added: "snapd.log" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/snapd/+bug/1967479/+attachment/5577352/+files/snapd.log -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1967479 Title: snaps lost connections during 22.04 upgrade To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/snapd/+bug/1967479/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1967479] [NEW] snaps lost connections during 22.04 upgrade
Public bug reported: Upgrading to yesterdays state of 22.04 (from 20.04) led to problems during upgrade, and lost all snap connections. (To be fair, the release upgrade itself had issues already, that might need an additional bug report, but at least no custom PPAs and just relying on Snaps for work). Almost none of the applications would start anymore because they lacked permission to the wayland socket and other crucial things. Reconnecting them solved the individual issues (and gave me a chance to rethink the level of security on a laptop), but the upgrade process should still handle that properly, and I wouldn't know where to start looking myself. This is no April Fools joke. If you insist on an April Fools joke: Check your Ubuntu Touch devices on devel 2022-04-01 and help us test the camera and screenshots. ;) ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 22.04 Package: snapd 2.55.2+22.04 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.15.0-23.23-generic 5.15.27 Uname: Linux 5.15.0-23-generic x86_64 ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu79 Architecture: amd64 CasperMD5CheckResult: unknown CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME Date: Fri Apr 1 10:12:49 2022 InstallationDate: Installed on 2021-04-24 (342 days ago) InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 20.04.1 LTS "Focal Fossa" - Release amd64 (20200731) SourcePackage: snapd UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to jammy on 2022-03-31 (0 days ago) ** Affects: snapd (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug jammy wayland-session -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1967479 Title: snaps lost connections during 22.04 upgrade To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/snapd/+bug/1967479/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1620635] Re: libapparmor's aa_query_label() always returns allowed = 0 for file rules containing the "owner" conditional
Seems as if label lookup is done using dbus: https://github.com/ubports /content-hub/blob/xenial/src/com/ubuntu/content/utils.cpp#L254 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1620635 Title: libapparmor's aa_query_label() always returns allowed = 0 for file rules containing the "owner" conditional To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/apparmor/+bug/1620635/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1620635] Re: libapparmor's aa_query_label() always returns allowed = 0 for file rules containing the "owner" conditional
AppArmor userspace in use: AppArmor parser version 2.10.95 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1620635 Title: libapparmor's aa_query_label() always returns allowed = 0 for file rules containing the "owner" conditional To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/apparmor/+bug/1620635/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1620635] Re: libapparmor's aa_query_label() always returns allowed = 0 for file rules containing the "owner" conditional
Nothing special from what I could gather, just: -) Calling an internal utility function for getting the allow status: https://github.com/ubports/content-hub/blob/xenial/src/com/ubuntu/content/detail/transfer.cpp#L187 -) Which eventually lands here: https://github.com/ubports/content-hub/blob/xenial/src/com/ubuntu/content/utils.cpp#L354 No special pid lookups or anything. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1620635 Title: libapparmor's aa_query_label() always returns allowed = 0 for file rules containing the "owner" conditional To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/apparmor/+bug/1620635/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1620635] Re: libapparmor's aa_query_label() always returns allowed = 0 for file rules containing the "owner" conditional
We're hitting this bug in UBports Ubuntu Touch on the Sony Xperia X (4.4 kernel, xenial AppArmor) as in #6 and #12, apps using content-hub to request files from a confined application fail receiving the file due to aa_query_label returning a denial before trying transfering a file. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1620635 Title: libapparmor's aa_query_label() always returns allowed = 0 for file rules containing the "owner" conditional To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/apparmor/+bug/1620635/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1838419] Re: ICE in emit_block_move_hints, at expr.c:1144
This seems to be the commit the backported fixes are based on: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs/gcc?view=revision&revision=261588 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1838419 Title: ICE in emit_block_move_hints, at expr.c:1144 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gcc-5/+bug/1838419/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1838419] Re: ICE in emit_block_move_hints, at expr.c:1144
A similar ICE (as in "in the same function in the same file") in the Debian gcc-6 (6.4.0) package has been fixed: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=901290 ** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #901290 https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=901290 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1838419 Title: ICE in emit_block_move_hints, at expr.c:1144 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gcc-5/+bug/1838419/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1838419] Re: ICE in emit_block_move_hints, at expr.c:1144
** Description changed: When building the Skia parts of QtWebEngine/Chromium GCC runs into an assert and fails building. - The build host is running Ubuntu 16.04 aarch64 trying to generate armhf binaries. + The build host is running Ubuntu 16.04 with GCC 5.4.0 on aarch64 trying to generate armhf binaries. Full build log incl. preprocessed C file is attached. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1838419 Title: ICE in emit_block_move_hints, at expr.c:1144 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gcc-5/+bug/1838419/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1838419] [NEW] ICE in emit_block_move_hints, at expr.c:1144
Public bug reported: When building the Skia parts of QtWebEngine/Chromium GCC runs into an assert and fails building. The build host is running Ubuntu 16.04 aarch64 trying to generate armhf binaries. Full build log incl. preprocessed C file is attached. ** Affects: gcc-5 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Attachment added: "qtwebengine_armhf_ice.log" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1838419/+attachment/5280015/+files/qtwebengine_armhf_ice.log -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1838419 Title: ICE in emit_block_move_hints, at expr.c:1144 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gcc-5/+bug/1838419/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1788927] [NEW] Removing repo key doesn't work
Public bug reported: Removing an apt key from within the software-properties GUI doesn't work, neither before (when the permission is not granted to the process and cached already) nor after entering the user password in the polkit prompt. Existance and enabled state of the repository related to the key doesn't influence the result either. software-properties-gtk --debug doesn't print information about the deletion of the key either. Steps to reproduce: 1) Add ppa via add-apt-repository to add an apt repo incl. key import 2) Open software-properties-gtk 3) Jump to the "Authentication" tab 4) Select a key and press the "Remove" button Expected behaviour: Key is successfully removed Actual behaviour: Key is not removed ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 18.04 Package: software-properties-gtk 0.96.24.32.4 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.15.0-33.36-generic 4.15.18 Uname: Linux 4.15.0-33-generic x86_64 ApportVersion: 2.20.9-0ubuntu7.2 Architecture: amd64 CurrentDesktop: communitheme:ubuntu:GNOME Date: Fri Aug 24 21:31:58 2018 PackageArchitecture: all SourcePackage: software-properties UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) ** Affects: software-properties (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug bionic third-party-packages wayland-session ** Description changed: - Removing an apt key from within the software-properties GUI doesn't work, neither before nor after entering the user password in the polkit prompt. + Removing an apt key from within the software-properties GUI doesn't work, neither before (when the permission is not granted to the process and cached already) nor after entering the user password in the polkit prompt. Existance and enabled state of the repository related to the key doesn't influence the result either. software-properties-gtk --debug doesn't print information about the deletion of the key either. Steps to reproduce: 1) Add ppa via add-apt-repository to add an apt repo incl. key import 2) Open software-properties-gtk 3) Jump to the "Authentication" tab 4) Select a key and press the "Remove" button Expected behaviour: Key is successfully removed Actual behaviour: Key is not removed ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 18.04 Package: software-properties-gtk 0.96.24.32.4 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.15.0-33.36-generic 4.15.18 Uname: Linux 4.15.0-33-generic x86_64 ApportVersion: 2.20.9-0ubuntu7.2 Architecture: amd64 CurrentDesktop: communitheme:ubuntu:GNOME Date: Fri Aug 24 21:31:58 2018 PackageArchitecture: all SourcePackage: software-properties UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1788927 Title: Removing repo key doesn't work To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/software-properties/+bug/1788927/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
