[Bug 1747333] Re: apparmor rules deny lease backup
This problem looks very similiar to https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/isc-dhcp/+bug/1543794 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1747333 Title: apparmor rules deny lease backup To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/isc-dhcp/+bug/1747333/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1747333] [NEW] apparmor rules deny lease backup
Public bug reported: Occasionally, I see this in my logs: Feb 4 02:27:07 giskard2 dhcpd[11485]: Can't backup lease database /var/lib/dhcp/dhcpd.leases to /var/lib/dhcp/dhcpd.leases~: Operation not permitted Feb 4 02:27:07 giskard2 kernel: [237980.192671] audit: type=1702 audit(1517711227.717:14): op=linkat ppid=1 pid=11485 auid=4294967295 uid=111 gid=121 euid=111 suid=111 fsuid=111 egid=121 sgid=121 fsgid=121 tty=(none) ses=4294967295 comm="dhcpd" exe="/usr/sbin/dhcpd" res=0 Feb 4 02:27:07 giskard2 kernel: [237980.192686] audit: type=1302 audit(1517711227.717:15): item=0 name="/var/lib/dhcp/dhcpd.leases" inode=3932557 dev=08:01 mode=0100644 ouid=0 ogid=121 rdev=00:00 nametype=NORMAL cap_fp= cap_fi= cap_fe=0 cap_fver=0 Essentially indicating that the apparmor profile has declined to allow a backup leases file to be created. However, the files does appear to be created. I am unsure why the message is being logged (is the file being created correctly? -- I do not know enough of dhcpd to tell). # lsb_release -a No LSB modules are available. Distributor ID: Ubuntu Description:Ubuntu 16.04.3 LTS Release:16.04 Codename: xenial # dpkg -l | grep dhcp ii isc-dhcp-client 4.3.3-5ubuntu12.7 amd64DHCP client for automatically obtaining an IP address ii isc-dhcp-common 4.3.3-5ubuntu12.7 amd64common files used by all of the isc-dhcp packages ii isc-dhcp-server 4.3.3-5ubuntu12.7 amd64ISC DHCP server for automatic IP address assignment ii wide-dhcpv6-client 20080615-16 amd64DHCPv6 client for automatic IPv6 hosts configuration # dpkg -l | grep apparmor ii apparmor2.10.95-0ubuntu2.7 amd64user-space parser utility for AppArmor ii apparmor-utils 2.10.95-0ubuntu2.7 amd64utilities for controlling AppArmor ii libapparmor-perl2.10.95-0ubuntu2.7 amd64AppArmor library Perl bindings ii libapparmor1:amd64 2.10.95-0ubuntu2.7 amd64changehat AppArmor library ii python3-apparmor2.10.95-0ubuntu2.7 amd64AppArmor Python3 utility library ii python3-libapparmor 2.10.95-0ubuntu2.7 amd64AppArmor library Python3 bindings # ls -la /var/lib/dhcp total 16 drwxrwsr-x 2 root dhcpd 4096 Feb 5 01:57 . drwxr-xr-x 52 root root 4096 Oct 3 2016 .. -rw-r--r-- 1 root dhcpd 1003 Feb 5 02:27 dhcpd.leases -rw-r--r-- 1 root dhcpd 1631 Feb 5 01:57 dhcpd.leases~ # find /etc/apparmor /etc/apparmor /etc/apparmor/init /etc/apparmor/init/network-interface-security /etc/apparmor/init/network-interface-security/sbin.dhclient /etc/apparmor/init/network-interface-security/usr.sbin.ntpd /etc/apparmor/severity.db /etc/apparmor/parser.conf /etc/apparmor/logprof.conf /etc/apparmor/subdomain.conf # find /etc/apparmor.d/ /etc/apparmor.d/ /etc/apparmor.d/usr.sbin.dhcpd /etc/apparmor.d/sbin.dhclient /etc/apparmor.d/usr.sbin.rsyslogd /etc/apparmor.d/usr.sbin.tcpdump /etc/apparmor.d/usr.sbin.named /etc/apparmor.d/abstractions /etc/apparmor.d/abstractions/ubuntu-helpers /etc/apparmor.d/abstractions/kde /etc/apparmor.d/abstractions/dbus-session /etc/apparmor.d/abstractions/nis /etc/apparmor.d/abstractions/base /etc/apparmor.d/abstractions/apparmor_api /etc/apparmor.d/abstractions/apparmor_api/examine /etc/apparmor.d/abstractions/apparmor_api/introspect /etc/apparmor.d/abstractions/apparmor_api/change_profile /etc/apparmor.d/abstractions/apparmor_api/find_mountpoint /etc/apparmor.d/abstractions/apparmor_api/is_enabled /etc/apparmor.d/abstractions/nvidia /etc/apparmor.d/abstractions/ubuntu-browsers /etc/apparmor.d/abstractions/ubuntu-email /etc/apparmor.d/abstractions/apache2-common /etc/apparmor.d/abstractions/private-files /etc/apparmor.d/abstractions/user-mail /etc/apparmor.d/abstractions/kerberosclient /etc/apparmor.d/abstractions/X /etc/apparmor.d/abstractions/ubuntu-browsers.d /etc/apparmor.d/abstractions/ubuntu-browsers.d/kde /etc/apparmor.d/abstractions/ubuntu-browsers.d/mailto /etc/apparmor.d/abstractions/ubuntu-browsers.d/ubuntu-integration /etc/apparmor.d/abstractions/ubuntu-browsers.d/plugins-common /etc/apparmor.d/abstractions/ubuntu-browsers.d/productivity /etc/apparmor.d/abstractions/ubuntu-browsers.d/multimedia /etc/apparmor.d/abstractions/ubuntu-browsers.d/user-files /etc/apparmor.d/abstractions/ubuntu-browsers.d/text-editors /etc/apparmor.d/abstractions/ubuntu-browsers.d/java /etc/apparmor.d/abstractions/ubuntu-browsers.d/ubuntu-integration-xul /etc/apparmor.d/abstractions/enchant /etc/apparmor.d/abstractions/dovecot-common
[Bug 1441901] Re: 3G modem mode switch doesn't work when using systemd
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1431179 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1431179 Ahh, in fact, I've found that by modifying /lib/systemd/system/usb_modeswitch@.service and changing ExecStart to be: ... ExecStart=/bin/echo %i ... Will cause udev to handle the device normally. So it is switched correctly. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1441901 Title: 3G modem mode switch doesn't work when using systemd To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/systemd/+bug/1441901/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1441901] Re: 3G modem mode switch doesn't work when using systemd
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1431179 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1431179 The same problem occurs with Ubuntu 16.04 LTS. Cold-boot, particularly, this seems to fail. Basically the problem is that usb_modeswitch_dispatcher is called with incorrect arguments. # systemctl --all | grep usb_modeswitch ● usb_modeswitch@1-9_1-9:1.0.service loadedfailed failedUSB_ModeSwitch_1-9_1-9:1.0 system-usb_modeswitch.slice loadedactive activesystem-usb_modeswitch.slice # systemctl status -l usb_modeswitch@1-9_1-9:1.0.service ● usb_modeswitch@1-9_1-9:1.0.service - USB_ModeSwitch_1-9_1-9:1.0 Loaded: loaded (/lib/systemd/system/usb_modeswitch@.service; static; vendor preset: enabled) Active: failed (Result: exit-code) since Wed 2016-10-05 13:33:07 UTC; 1h 4min ago Process: 615 ExecStart=/usr/sbin/usb_modeswitch_dispatcher --switch-systemd %i (code=exited, status=1/FAILURE) Main PID: 615 (code=exited, status=1/FAILURE) Oct 05 13:33:04 giskard2 systemd[1]: Starting USB_ModeSwitch_1-9_1-9:1.0... Oct 05 13:33:07 giskard2 systemd[1]: usb_modeswitch@1-9_1-9:1.0.service: Main process exited, code=exited, status=1/FAILURE Oct 05 13:33:07 giskard2 systemd[1]: Failed to start USB_ModeSwitch_1-9_1-9:1.0. Oct 05 13:33:07 giskard2 systemd[1]: usb_modeswitch@1-9_1-9:1.0.service: Unit entered failed state. Oct 05 13:33:07 giskard2 systemd[1]: usb_modeswitch@1-9_1-9:1.0.service: Failed with result 'exit-code'. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1441901 Title: 3G modem mode switch doesn't work when using systemd To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/systemd/+bug/1441901/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1441901] Re: 3G modem mode switch doesn't work when using systemd
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1431179 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1431179 However, calling, usb_modeswitch_dispatcher with the following: # /usr/sbin/usb_modeswitch_dispatcher --switch-systemd 1-9:1.0 Seems to work fine. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1441901 Title: 3G modem mode switch doesn't work when using systemd To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/systemd/+bug/1441901/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1431179] Re: usb_modeswitch@.service fails
@pitti, whilst you have a fix released as noted in the latest comment - and the duplicate there is a class of modems (Huawei, which I also have) where this still continues to fail. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1431179 Title: usb_modeswitch@.service fails To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/usb-modeswitch/+bug/1431179/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1629789] [NEW] package plymouth 0.9.2-3ubuntu13.1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1
Public bug reported: This was automatically done for me whilst upgrading from 14.04 LTS to 16.04 LTS. ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 16.04 Package: plymouth 0.9.2-3ubuntu13.1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.13.0-95.142-generic 3.13.11-ckt39 Uname: Linux 3.13.0-95-generic x86_64 ApportVersion: 2.20.1-0ubuntu2.1 Architecture: amd64 Date: Mon Oct 3 07:58:46 2016 DefaultPlymouth: Error: command ['readlink', '/etc/alternatives/default.plymouth'] failed with exit code 1: ErrorMessage: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 InstallationDate: Installed on 2012-01-17 (1720 days ago) InstallationMedia: Ubuntu-Server 10.04.3 LTS "Lucid Lynx" - Release amd64 (20110719.2) MachineType: Hewlett-Packard HP Compaq dc5750 Small Form Factor ProcCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-3.13.0-95-generic root=UUID=0563ecb7-db49-44da-aa61-59f5fd4dfdc9 ro quiet ProcFB: 0 radeondrmfb ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-3.13.0-95-generic root=UUID=0563ecb7-db49-44da-aa61-59f5fd4dfdc9 ro quiet RelatedPackageVersions: dpkg 1.18.4ubuntu1.1 apt 1.2.12~ubuntu16.04.1 SourcePackage: plymouth TextPlymouth: /lib/plymouth/themes/ubuntu-text/ubuntu-text.plymouth Title: package plymouth 0.9.2-3ubuntu13.1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to xenial on 2016-10-03 (0 days ago) dmi.bios.date: 01/25/2007 dmi.bios.vendor: Hewlett-Packard dmi.bios.version: 786E3 v02.10 dmi.board.name: 0A64h dmi.board.vendor: Hewlett-Packard dmi.chassis.asset.tag: AUD82704CT dmi.chassis.type: 4 dmi.chassis.vendor: Hewlett-Packard dmi.modalias: dmi:bvnHewlett-Packard:bvr786E3v02.10:bd01/25/2007:svnHewlett-Packard:pnHPCompaqdc5750SmallFormFactor:pvr:rvnHewlett-Packard:rn0A64h:rvr:cvnHewlett-Packard:ct4:cvr: dmi.product.name: HP Compaq dc5750 Small Form Factor dmi.sys.vendor: Hewlett-Packard ** Affects: plymouth (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-package xenial -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1629789 Title: package plymouth 0.9.2-3ubuntu13.1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/plymouth/+bug/1629789/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1406729] Re: dig does not have a default trusted key
Considering that the 'bind9' package ships the root key (in /etc/bind/bind.keys), I see no reason why it should not also be shipped in the dnsutils package as well. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to bind9 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1406729 Title: dig does not have a default trusted key To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bind9/+bug/1406729/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1406729] Re: dig does not have a default trusted key
Considering that the 'bind9' package ships the root key (in /etc/bind/bind.keys), I see no reason why it should not also be shipped in the dnsutils package as well. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1406729 Title: dig does not have a default trusted key To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bind9/+bug/1406729/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1406729] [NEW] dig does not have a default trusted key
Public bug reported: dig, as supplied, will not validate a DNSSEC domain. The +sigchase option should cause validation to occur but it does not. As noted in http://bryars.eu/2010/08/validating-and-exploring-dnssec- with-dig/ if a file called 'trusted-key.key' is present then dig will use that. By default dig will look in /etc/trusted-key.key and then the current directory. By supplying the file /etc/trusted-key.key, dig's signature checking will work out of the box. Thanks, Anand ** Affects: bind9 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to bind9 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1406729 Title: dig does not have a default trusted key To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bind9/+bug/1406729/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 782614] Re: make configuring DNSSEC validation easier
Just a note on this 3 year old bug. The gauge on the root servers has been gauged - DNSSEC was turned on many years ago. You can enable and turn this on by default and the traffic will be neglible. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/782614 Title: make configuring DNSSEC validation easier To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bind9/+bug/782614/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1406729] [NEW] dig does not have a default trusted key
Public bug reported: dig, as supplied, will not validate a DNSSEC domain. The +sigchase option should cause validation to occur but it does not. As noted in http://bryars.eu/2010/08/validating-and-exploring-dnssec- with-dig/ if a file called 'trusted-key.key' is present then dig will use that. By default dig will look in /etc/trusted-key.key and then the current directory. By supplying the file /etc/trusted-key.key, dig's signature checking will work out of the box. Thanks, Anand ** Affects: bind9 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1406729 Title: dig does not have a default trusted key To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bind9/+bug/1406729/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1206230] [NEW] ifupdown: don't use PPP updetach option by default
Public bug reported: I am being bitten by the *exact* set of circumstances as in Debian bug #675016 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=675016 In my case, it brought my network to a complete standstill, until I had someone physically go and visit the machine. This appears to have been fixed in later versions of the ifup package and *only* affects 12.04 LTS 1. lsb_release -rd Description:Ubuntu 12.04.1 LTS Release:12.04 2. # apt-cache policy ifupdown ifupdown: Installed: 0.7~beta2ubuntu8 Candidate: 0.7~beta2ubuntu8 Version table: *** 0.7~beta2ubuntu8 0 500 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ precise/main amd64 Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status ** Affects: ifupdown (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1206230 Title: ifupdown: don't use PPP updetach option by default To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ifupdown/+bug/1206230/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1206230] Re: ifupdown: don't use PPP updetach option by default
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #675016 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=675016 ** Also affects: ifupdown via http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=675016 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1206230 Title: ifupdown: don't use PPP updetach option by default To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ifupdown/+bug/1206230/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1174854] [NEW] ip-up incorrectly overwrites logs
Public bug reported: 1) Description:Ubuntu 12.04.1 LTS Release:12.04 2) # apt-cache policy ppp ppp: Installed: 2.4.5-5ubuntu1 Candidate: 2.4.5-5ubuntu1 Version table: *** 2.4.5-5ubuntu1 0 500 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ precise/main amd64 Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status 3) The ip-up script should log what is going on, if the file /var/log/ppp- ipupdown.log exists. It should append to the file, so that you can see the various up / down invocations. 4) Each time the file is truncated. ** Affects: ppp (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Patch added: ip-up.patch https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1174854/+attachment/3660416/+files/ip-up.patch -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1174854 Title: ip-up incorrectly overwrites logs To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ppp/+bug/1174854/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1174857] [NEW] ipv6-up fails to log anything
Public bug reported: 1) Description: Ubuntu 12.04.1 LTS Release: 12.04 2) # apt-cache policy ppp ppp: Installed: 2.4.5-5ubuntu1 Candidate: 2.4.5-5ubuntu1 Version table: *** 2.4.5-5ubuntu1 0 500 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ precise/main amd64 Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status 3) Logging of what was occuring when IPv6 up events happened. 4) The log file, /var/log/ppp-ipupdown.log was appended to but nothing was there! 5) The attached patch fixes this - the same problem exists for ipv6-down too. ** Affects: ppp (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Patch added: ipv6-up.patch https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1174857/+attachment/3660422/+files/ipv6-up.patch -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1174857 Title: ipv6-up fails to log anything To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ppp/+bug/1174857/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1173483] [NEW] dhclient segfaults on interfaces it can not handle
Public bug reported: Hi, This is with version: 4.2.4-5ubuntu2wf1, which is a backport to precise of the current raring dhcp verion (4.2.4-5ubuntu2). The only modification is changing the targeted release. I was under the impression that ISC DHCP (now) supported prefix delegation. # dhclient -d -v -6 -P --no-pid ppp0 Internet Systems Consortium DHCP Client 4.2.4 Copyright 2004-2012 Internet Systems Consortium. All rights reserved. For info, please visit https://www.isc.org/software/dhcp/ Bound to *:546 Segmentation fault (core dumped) Installing the isc-client-dbg is a bit more revealing: # gdb --args dhclient -d -v -6 -P --no-pid ppp0 GNU gdb (Ubuntu/Linaro 7.4-2012.02-0ubuntu2) 7.4-2012.02 Copyright (C) 2012 Free Software Foundation, Inc. License GPLv3+: GNU GPL version 3 or later http://gnu.org/licenses/gpl.html This is free software: you are free to change and redistribute it. There is NO WARRANTY, to the extent permitted by law. Type show copying and show warranty for details. This GDB was configured as x86_64-linux-gnu. For bug reporting instructions, please see: http://bugs.launchpad.net/gdb-linaro/... Reading symbols from /sbin/dhclient...Reading symbols from /usr/lib/debug/sbin/dhclient...done. done. (gdb) run Starting program: /sbin/dhclient -d -v -6 -P --no-pid ppp0 Internet Systems Consortium DHCP Client 4.2.4 Copyright 2004-2012 Internet Systems Consortium. All rights reserved. For info, please visit https://www.isc.org/software/dhcp/ Bound to *:546 Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. 0x7f94311a2161 in vfprintf () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6 (gdb) bt #0 0x7f94311a2161 in vfprintf () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6 #1 0x7f943125ed80 in __vsnprintf_chk () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6 #2 0x7f94317979a8 in vsnprintf (__ap=0x7261ab08, __fmt=0x7f9431adcba0 Unsupported device type %h for \%s\, __n=1024, __s=0x7f9431adcfa0 Unsupported device type % for \www.isc.org/software/dhcp/) at /usr/include/x86_64-linux-gnu/bits/stdio2.h:78 #3 log_fatal (fmt=optimised out) at errwarn.c:64 #4 0x7f9431773ffd in get_hw_addr (info=0x7f9432b26a50) at lpf.c:712 #5 0x7f9431789318 in if_register6 (info=0x7f9432b26a50, do_multicast=optimised out) at socket.c:501 #6 0x7f943176d72d in discover_interfaces (state=4) at discover.c:1264 #7 0x7f9431750d95 in main (argc=optimised out, argv=optimised out) at dhclient.c:569 (gdb) It is a shame that ISC DHCP still does not support DHCPv6 PD over PPP interfaces but it certainly should not segfault when attempting to report an error. ** Affects: isc-dhcp (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1173483 Title: dhclient segfaults on interfaces it can not handle To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/isc-dhcp/+bug/1173483/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1090593] Re: D.ROOT-SERVERS.NET changing January 3rd 2013
As noted in http://d.root-servers.org/renumber.html, the change will be done on the 3rd Jan and the old IP address will be retried 6 months later. Could we get proposed-update packages before the 3rd Jun (when the old IP will stop responding)? I'm presuming that the Ubuntu guys are waiting until the start of May so that 8.04 LTS does not need new packages. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to bind9 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1090593 Title: D.ROOT-SERVERS.NET changing January 3rd 2013 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bind9/+bug/1090593/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1090593] Re: D.ROOT-SERVERS.NET changing January 3rd 2013
As noted in http://d.root-servers.org/renumber.html, the change will be done on the 3rd Jan and the old IP address will be retried 6 months later. Could we get proposed-update packages before the 3rd Jun (when the old IP will stop responding)? I'm presuming that the Ubuntu guys are waiting until the start of May so that 8.04 LTS does not need new packages. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1090593 Title: D.ROOT-SERVERS.NET changing January 3rd 2013 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bind9/+bug/1090593/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 675573] Re: fails to suspend / resume on certified hardware
Hi, A year has passed since this bug was confirmed. 18 months have elapsed since I first reported it. This is not directed at you personally, but I believe that if a distribution wants to have people test it's early, alpha or beta, versions the best way is to engage people who report bugs. Ubuntu has consistently demonstrated that it is not able to. And the quality of Ubuntu has suffered, and continues to suffer, as a result. I no longer use Ubuntu simply because the bug reporting experience has been so terrible. Thanks, Anand On 25 July 2012 22:54, Christopher M. Penalver christopher.penal...@gmx.com wrote: Anand Kumria, this bug was reported a while ago and there hasn't been any activity in it recently. We were wondering if this is still an issue? If so, could you please provide the information following https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DebuggingKernelSuspend ? As well, can you try with the latest development release of Ubuntu? ISO CD images are available from http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/releases/ . If it remains an issue, could you run the following command in the development release from a Terminal (Applications-Accessories-Terminal). It will automatically gather and attach updated debug information to this report. apport-collect -p linux replace-with-bug-number Also, if you could test the latest upstream kernel available that would be great. It will allow additional upstream developers to examine the issue. Refer to https://wiki.ubuntu.com/KernelMainlineBuilds . Please do not test the kernel in the daily folder, but the one all the way at the bottom. Once you've tested the upstream kernel, please remove the 'needs-upstream-testing' tag. This can be done by clicking on the yellow pencil icon next to the tag located at the bottom of the bug description and deleting the 'needs-upstream-testing' text. As well, please comment on which kernel version specifically you tested. If this bug is fixed in the mainline kernel, please add the following tag 'kernel-fixed-upstream'. If the mainline kernel does not fix this bug, please add the tag: 'kernel-bug-exists-upstream'. If you are unable to test the mainline kernel, for example it will not boot, please add the tag: 'kernel-unable-to-test-upstream', and comment as to why specifically you were unable to test it. Please let us know your results. Thanks in advance. Helpful Bug Reporting Links: https://help.ubuntu.com/community/ReportingBugs#Bug_Reporting_Etiquette https://help.ubuntu.com/community/ReportingBugs#A3._Make_sure_the_bug_hasn.27t_already_been_reported https://help.ubuntu.com/community/ReportingBugs#Adding_Apport_Debug_Information_to_an_Existing_Launchpad_Bug https://help.ubuntu.com/community/ReportingBugs#Adding_Additional_Attachments_to_an_Existing_Launchpad_Bug ** Tags added: needs-upstream-testing ** Description changed: Hi, Ubuntu fails to correctly suspend / resume on this device. Despite is being marked as certified. I am unclear if the certification is done by the vendor or Canonical. But http://webapps.ubuntu.com/certification/hardware/201001-4955/ is clearly not correct. + + WORKAROUND: As an interesting data point, I installed the propreitary + NVidia drivers and suspend / resume work perfectly (same kernel). ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04 Package: linux-image (not installed) Regression: No Reproducible: Yes ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-26.46-generic 2.6.32.24+drm33.11 Uname: Linux 2.6.32-26-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: wl AlsaVersion: Advanced Linux Sound Architecture Driver Version 1.0.21. AplayDevices: - List of PLAYBACK Hardware Devices - card 0: Intel [HDA Intel], device 0: STAC92xx Analog [STAC92xx Analog] -Subdevices: 0/1 -Subdevice #0: subdevice #0 + List of PLAYBACK Hardware Devices + card 0: Intel [HDA Intel], device 0: STAC92xx Analog [STAC92xx Analog] +Subdevices: 0/1 +Subdevice #0: subdevice #0 Architecture: amd64 ArecordDevices: - List of CAPTURE Hardware Devices - card 0: Intel [HDA Intel], device 0: STAC92xx Analog [STAC92xx Analog] -Subdevices: 2/2 -Subdevice #0: subdevice #0 -Subdevice #1: subdevice #1 + List of CAPTURE Hardware Devices + card 0: Intel [HDA Intel], device 0: STAC92xx Analog [STAC92xx Analog] +Subdevices: 2/2 +Subdevice #0: subdevice #0 +Subdevice #1: subdevice #1 AudioDevicesInUse: - USERPID ACCESS COMMAND - /dev/snd/controlC0: anand 2311 F pulseaudio + USERPID ACCESS COMMAND + /dev/snd/controlC0: anand 2311 F pulseaudio CRDA: Error: [Errno 2] No such file or directory Card0.Amixer.info: - Card hw:0 'Intel'/'HDA Intel at 0xfbe0 irq 22' -Mixer name : 'IDT 92HD81B1X5' -Components : 'HDA:111d7605,1028043f,00100104' -Controls : 18 -Simple ctrls : 12 + Card hw:0 'Intel'/'HDA Intel
Re: [Bug 675573] Re: fails to suspend / resume on certified hardware
Hi Chris, I'm unlikely to do any of the suggestions you mention as, as you've read, I no longer use Ubuntu. Well, I do - but I never bother to report bugs anymore. Making Ubuntu better for others, by reporting bugs, is - as I explained - unrewarding. Regards, Anand On 25 July 2012 23:49, Christopher M. Penalver christopher.penal...@gmx.com wrote: Anand Kumria, this bug report is being closed due to your last comment regarding you no longer using Ubuntu. For future reference you can manage the status of your own bugs by clicking on the current status in the yellow line and then choosing a new status in the revealed drop down box. You can learn more about bug statuses at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/Status. Thank you again for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. Please submit any future bugs you may find. ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to the bug report. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/675573 Title: fails to suspend / resume on certified hardware Status in “linux” package in Ubuntu: Invalid Bug description: Hi, Ubuntu fails to correctly suspend / resume on this device. Despite is being marked as certified. I am unclear if the certification is done by the vendor or Canonical. But http://webapps.ubuntu.com/certification/hardware/201001-4955/ is clearly not correct. WORKAROUND: As an interesting data point, I installed the propreitary NVidia drivers and suspend / resume work perfectly (same kernel). ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04 Package: linux-image (not installed) Regression: No Reproducible: Yes ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-26.46-generic 2.6.32.24+drm33.11 Uname: Linux 2.6.32-26-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: wl AlsaVersion: Advanced Linux Sound Architecture Driver Version 1.0.21. AplayDevices: List of PLAYBACK Hardware Devices card 0: Intel [HDA Intel], device 0: STAC92xx Analog [STAC92xx Analog] Subdevices: 0/1 Subdevice #0: subdevice #0 Architecture: amd64 ArecordDevices: List of CAPTURE Hardware Devices card 0: Intel [HDA Intel], device 0: STAC92xx Analog [STAC92xx Analog] Subdevices: 2/2 Subdevice #0: subdevice #0 Subdevice #1: subdevice #1 AudioDevicesInUse: USERPID ACCESS COMMAND /dev/snd/controlC0: anand 2311 F pulseaudio CRDA: Error: [Errno 2] No such file or directory Card0.Amixer.info: Card hw:0 'Intel'/'HDA Intel at 0xfbe0 irq 22' Mixer name : 'IDT 92HD81B1X5' Components : 'HDA:111d7605,1028043f,00100104' Controls : 18 Simple ctrls : 12 Card1.Amixer.info: Card hw:1 'NVidia'/'HDA NVidia at 0xfb08 irq 16' Mixer name : 'Nvidia ID b' Components : 'HDA:10de000b,10de0101,00100100' Controls : 0 Simple ctrls : 0 Card1.Amixer.values: Date: Mon Nov 15 14:50:54 2010 HibernationDevice: RESUME=UUID=d1f50e6c-c7ed-4a59-b9dc-4695b5d20ff5 InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.04 LTS Lucid Lynx - Release amd64 (20100429) MachineType: Dell Inc. Vostro 3300 ProcCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-2.6.32-26-generic root=UUID=5e5dbc25-bc60-422e-9227-9ede108329e7 ro quiet splash ProcEnviron: PATH=(custom, user) LANG=en_AU.utf8 SHELL=/bin/zsh RelatedPackageVersions: linux-firmware 1.34.1 RfKill: 2: hci0: Bluetooth Soft blocked: no Hard blocked: no SourcePackage: linux dmi.bios.date: 09/16/2010 dmi.bios.vendor: Dell Inc. dmi.bios.version: A09 dmi.board.name: 07JC8T dmi.board.vendor: Dell Inc. dmi.board.version: A00 dmi.chassis.type: 8 dmi.chassis.vendor: Dell Inc. dmi.chassis.version: Not Specified dmi.modalias: dmi:bvnDellInc.:bvrA09:bd09/16/2010:svnDellInc.:pnVostro3300:pvrNotSpecified:rvnDellInc.:rn07JC8T:rvrA00:cvnDellInc.:ct8:cvrNotSpecified: dmi.product.name: Vostro 3300 dmi.product.version: Not Specified dmi.sys.vendor: Dell Inc. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/675573/+subscriptions -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/675573 Title: fails to suspend / resume on certified hardware To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/675573/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 850662] Re: indicator-sound-service crashed with SIGABRT in pa_cvolume_set()
I have: indicator-sound (0.7.9-0ubuntu2.1) oneiric-proposed; urgency=low installed, and apport came up and directed me to this error. Unhelpfully, it has not offered a bug pattern or core dump or anything. However this occurred when I plugged in an external keyboard and used the sound control keys on the external keyboard rather than my laptop. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/850662 Title: indicator-sound-service crashed with SIGABRT in pa_cvolume_set() To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/indicator-sound/+bug/850662/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 889584] [NEW] bad version number in trigger
Public bug reported: Whilst performing an upgrade from 11.04 - 11.10, I saw this message fly by the upgrade terminal: Processing triggers for initramfs-tools ... dpkg: error: version '2.6.38.7-30.fc15.x86_64' has bad syntax: invalid character in revision number update-initramfs: Generating /boot/initrd.img-2.6.38-12-generic My machine has both Windows 7 and Fedora 15 co-installed (and it can boot any of them) from the grub menu. ** Affects: initramfs-tools (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/889584 Title: bad version number in trigger To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/initramfs-tools/+bug/889584/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 697095] Re: polkit-gnome-authentication-agent-1 crashed with SIGSEGV in g_datalist_id_set_data_full() during logout
#134 indicates that #6 is the reason for marking as wontfix and not open to SRU. #6 just says that it happens on logout. Actually, this is a particularly egregious and annoying bug. It happens on shutdown too. It means that a laptop will lock-up, and you need to forcibly power it off, and then wait for a fsck when next starting. The condition for this bug to be triggered is: - install updates that require a reboot - perform the reboot via the menu - wait for machine to lock-up -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/697095 Title: polkit-gnome-authentication-agent-1 crashed with SIGSEGV in g_datalist_id_set_data_full() during logout To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/policykit-1-gnome/+bug/697095/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 598597] Re: Vinagre closes connection to tightvncserver 2.0 beta4 immediately
Confirming that this works against tightvnc servers (running Windows XP / Windows Vista / Windows 7) - which is what I tested against. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/598597 Title: Vinagre closes connection to tightvncserver 2.0 beta4 immediately To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gtk-vnc/+bug/598597/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 815401] Re: pidgin crashed with SIGSEGV in jingle_transport_parse()
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 817119 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/817119 Odd that this is marked as duplicate of a later bug. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/815401 Title: pidgin crashed with SIGSEGV in jingle_transport_parse() To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pidgin/+bug/815401/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 817119] Re: Receiving a video chat invite from Google Talk crashes Pidgin.
This fix should also be done for the packages in Ubuntu LTS too (How do I mark a bug as such in Launchpad?) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to the bug report. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/817119 Title: Receiving a video chat invite from Google Talk crashes Pidgin. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/pidgin/+bug/817119/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 817119] Re: Receiving a video chat invite from Google Talk crashes Pidgin.
I've asked on IRC, and was told it was OK to subscribe the stable-sru team. I was also told that https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates is geared towards the people uploading a fix (i.e. developers and not bug reporters) So, it isn't clear to me what other things I should do apart from subscribing the relevant team. Cheers, Anand -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to the bug report. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/817119 Title: Receiving a video chat invite from Google Talk crashes Pidgin. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/pidgin/+bug/817119/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 825825] [NEW] have DNS based verification occur by default
Public bug reported: Hi, openssh can lookup a host's key in the DNS (via the SSHFP record) and use it compare hosts presented public key. VerifyHostKeyDNS yes I believe that is the connection is secured via DNSSEC that this option will allow for the host's key to be automagically accepted. However I have not verified that myself. However I have had this personally set to 'Yes' and for initial connection to hosts which are NOT secured via DNSSEC I am prompted to accept the key. If you want to be more cautious with the change then perhaps setting 'VerifyHostKeyDNS ask' would be better. Either way, I think that making this the default option will: - increase security for those who choose to deploy SSHFP - increased awareness of this ability The only downside is that a connection will make external calls to the DNS to determine if a SSHFP record exists. It would be great if this change could be made before 12.04 is released. ** Affects: openssh (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to openssh in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/825825 Title: have DNS based verification occur by default To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openssh/+bug/825825/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 825825] Re: have DNS based verification occur by default
Meant to say that /etc/ssh/config would be the place to put the default configuration. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to openssh in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/825825 Title: have DNS based verification occur by default To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openssh/+bug/825825/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 825825] [NEW] have DNS based verification occur by default
Public bug reported: Hi, openssh can lookup a host's key in the DNS (via the SSHFP record) and use it compare hosts presented public key. VerifyHostKeyDNS yes I believe that is the connection is secured via DNSSEC that this option will allow for the host's key to be automagically accepted. However I have not verified that myself. However I have had this personally set to 'Yes' and for initial connection to hosts which are NOT secured via DNSSEC I am prompted to accept the key. If you want to be more cautious with the change then perhaps setting 'VerifyHostKeyDNS ask' would be better. Either way, I think that making this the default option will: - increase security for those who choose to deploy SSHFP - increased awareness of this ability The only downside is that a connection will make external calls to the DNS to determine if a SSHFP record exists. It would be great if this change could be made before 12.04 is released. ** Affects: openssh (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/825825 Title: have DNS based verification occur by default To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openssh/+bug/825825/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 825825] Re: have DNS based verification occur by default
Meant to say that /etc/ssh/config would be the place to put the default configuration. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/825825 Title: have DNS based verification occur by default To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openssh/+bug/825825/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 446270] Re: changlog summary is not visible
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 537934 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/537934 Amusing that the bug I'm a duplicate of was reported after me. But so long as you are looking it, cool. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/446270 Title: changlog summary is not visible To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/update-manager/+bug/446270/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 782614] Re: make configuring DNSSEC validation easier
** Patch added: 0004-dnssec-in-options.patch https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bind9/+bug/782614/+attachment/2257805/+files/0004-dnssec-in-options.patch -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to bind9 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/782614 Title: make configuring DNSSEC validation easier To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bind9/+bug/782614/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 782614] Re: make configuring DNSSEC validation easier
DNSSEC will place an additional burden on the network and, in particular, the infrastructure based DNS servers. The rationale to have the root key defined here but not used is that will use some of the existing DNS infrastructure (via use of RFC5011) and allow server operators to gauge load. I would recommend that Ubuntu 11.10 ships with DNSSEC available (i.e. root key but disabled) and Ubuntu 12.04 ships with DNSSEC enabled (i.e. root key and enabled by default), so that server operators are not overwhelmed. ** Patch added: 0005-Add-in-the-current-root-.-DNSSEC-key.patch https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bind9/+bug/782614/+attachment/2257836/+files/0005-Add-in-the-current-root-.-DNSSEC-key.patch -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to bind9 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/782614 Title: make configuring DNSSEC validation easier To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bind9/+bug/782614/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 782614] Re: make configuring DNSSEC validation easier
Note, I just checked Fedora 15 and the root key is setup similarly and is *enabled* by default as well. So you might just want to do so within Ubuntu as well. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to bind9 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/782614 Title: make configuring DNSSEC validation easier To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bind9/+bug/782614/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 782614] Re: make configuring DNSSEC validation easier
** Patch added: 0004-dnssec-in-options.patch https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bind9/+bug/782614/+attachment/2257805/+files/0004-dnssec-in-options.patch -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/782614 Title: make configuring DNSSEC validation easier To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bind9/+bug/782614/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 782614] Re: make configuring DNSSEC validation easier
DNSSEC will place an additional burden on the network and, in particular, the infrastructure based DNS servers. The rationale to have the root key defined here but not used is that will use some of the existing DNS infrastructure (via use of RFC5011) and allow server operators to gauge load. I would recommend that Ubuntu 11.10 ships with DNSSEC available (i.e. root key but disabled) and Ubuntu 12.04 ships with DNSSEC enabled (i.e. root key and enabled by default), so that server operators are not overwhelmed. ** Patch added: 0005-Add-in-the-current-root-.-DNSSEC-key.patch https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bind9/+bug/782614/+attachment/2257836/+files/0005-Add-in-the-current-root-.-DNSSEC-key.patch -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/782614 Title: make configuring DNSSEC validation easier To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bind9/+bug/782614/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 782614] Re: make configuring DNSSEC validation easier
Note, I just checked Fedora 15 and the root key is setup similarly and is *enabled* by default as well. So you might just want to do so within Ubuntu as well. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/782614 Title: make configuring DNSSEC validation easier To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bind9/+bug/782614/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 782614] Re: make configuring DNSSEC validation easier
** Patch added: 0001-Add-a-named.conf.keys-file-for-storing-various-keys.patch https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bind9/+bug/782614/+attachment/2256290/+files/0001-Add-a-named.conf.keys-file-for-storing-various-keys.patch -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to bind9 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/782614 Title: make configuring DNSSEC validation easier To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bind9/+bug/782614/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 782614] Re: make configuring DNSSEC validation easier
** Patch added: 0002-Install-the-named.conf.keys-file.patch https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bind9/+bug/782614/+attachment/2256307/+files/0002-Install-the-named.conf.keys-file.patch -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to bind9 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/782614 Title: make configuring DNSSEC validation easier To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bind9/+bug/782614/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 782614] Re: make configuring DNSSEC validation easier
** Patch added: 0003-Include-the-named.conf.keys-file.patch https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bind9/+bug/782614/+attachment/2256349/+files/0003-Include-the-named.conf.keys-file.patch -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to bind9 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/782614 Title: make configuring DNSSEC validation easier To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bind9/+bug/782614/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 782614] Re: make configuring DNSSEC validation easier
** Patch added: 0001-Add-a-named.conf.keys-file-for-storing-various-keys.patch https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bind9/+bug/782614/+attachment/2256290/+files/0001-Add-a-named.conf.keys-file-for-storing-various-keys.patch -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/782614 Title: make configuring DNSSEC validation easier To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bind9/+bug/782614/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 782614] Re: make configuring DNSSEC validation easier
** Patch added: 0002-Install-the-named.conf.keys-file.patch https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bind9/+bug/782614/+attachment/2256307/+files/0002-Install-the-named.conf.keys-file.patch -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/782614 Title: make configuring DNSSEC validation easier To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bind9/+bug/782614/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 782614] Re: make configuring DNSSEC validation easier
** Patch added: 0003-Include-the-named.conf.keys-file.patch https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bind9/+bug/782614/+attachment/2256349/+files/0003-Include-the-named.conf.keys-file.patch -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/782614 Title: make configuring DNSSEC validation easier To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bind9/+bug/782614/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 605871] Re: [needs-packaging] rrdtool 1.4.4
libdbi is now clear in the later version of Ubuntu. Any progress on an updated rrdtool? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to rrdtool in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/605871 Title: [needs-packaging] rrdtool 1.4.4 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/rrdtool/+bug/605871/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 605871] Re: [needs-packaging] rrdtool 1.4.4
libdbi is now clear in the later version of Ubuntu. Any progress on an updated rrdtool? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/605871 Title: [needs-packaging] rrdtool 1.4.4 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/rrdtool/+bug/605871/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 816163] [NEW] Please include support for RFC6189 (ZRTP)
Public bug reported: Hi, It would be great if empathy support RFC6189 (ZRTP) across the various protocols which support it. Typically SIP and XMPP/Jingle since they both use RTP; just as having OTR for messaging is useful, having ZRTP is useful for confidentially of voice communications as well. Thanks, Anand ** Affects: empathy (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/816163 Title: Please include support for RFC6189 (ZRTP) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/empathy/+bug/816163/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 296867] Re: empathy needs to support OTR encryption
Hi Jordon, You indicated in https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16891 that there would be a monthly update. And earlier you indicated that people should watch: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16891 and https://bugs.freedesktop.org//show_bug.cgi?id=29904 Do you have a code repository that someone can checkout and assist you with thing can see? Thanks, Anand -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/296867 Title: empathy needs to support OTR encryption To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/empathy/+bug/296867/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 786113] [NEW] package bcmwl-kernel-source 5.60.48.36+bdcom-0ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: bcmwl kernel module failed to build
Public bug reported: When installing linux-image-generic-lts-backport-maverick on Lucid (10.04) this occurred. ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04 Package: bcmwl-kernel-source 5.60.48.36+bdcom-0ubuntu3 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-32.62-generic 2.6.32.38+drm33.16 Uname: Linux 2.6.32-32-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia wl Architecture: amd64 Date: Sat May 21 10:17:02 2011 ErrorMessage: bcmwl kernel module failed to build InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.04 LTS Lucid Lynx - Release amd64 (20100429) PackageVersion: 5.60.48.36+bdcom-0ubuntu3 SourcePackage: bcmwl Title: package bcmwl-kernel-source 5.60.48.36+bdcom-0ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: bcmwl kernel module failed to build ** Affects: bcmwl (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-package lucid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/786113 Title: package bcmwl-kernel-source 5.60.48.36+bdcom-0ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: bcmwl kernel module failed to build -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 786113] Re: package bcmwl-kernel-source 5.60.48.36+bdcom-0ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: bcmwl kernel module failed to build
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/786113 Title: package bcmwl-kernel-source 5.60.48.36+bdcom-0ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: bcmwl kernel module failed to build -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 782614] Re: make configuring DNSSEC validation easier
** Changed in: bind9 (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to bind9 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/782614 Title: make configuring DNSSEC validation easier -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 782614] Re: make configuring DNSSEC validation easier
** Changed in: bind9 (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/782614 Title: make configuring DNSSEC validation easier -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 782614] Re: make configuring DNSSEC validation easier
All versions of BIND that Ubuntu has ever published could do with improvements in making DNSSEC easier. However, as noted in the linked instructions, the specific suggestions apply to Bind 9.7+ Which, according to http://packages.ubuntu.com/search?keywords=bind9 is Ubuntu 10.04 (Lucid) and later. Thanks, Anand -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to bind9 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/782614 Title: make configuring DNSSEC validation easier -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 782614] Re: make configuring DNSSEC validation easier
All versions of BIND that Ubuntu has ever published could do with improvements in making DNSSEC easier. However, as noted in the linked instructions, the specific suggestions apply to Bind 9.7+ Which, according to http://packages.ubuntu.com/search?keywords=bind9 is Ubuntu 10.04 (Lucid) and later. Thanks, Anand -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/782614 Title: make configuring DNSSEC validation easier -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 782614] [NEW] make configuring DNSSEC validation easier
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: bind9 As noted here: http://wiki.debian.org/DNSSEC#BIND9 The are some configuration changes required to enable DNSSEC validation. I think it would be nicer if things could be made easier. Create an empty file /etc/bind/named.conf.keys Include the file in /etc/bind/named.conf Include a commented out entry in /etc/bind/named.conf.options of: // dnssec-validation yes; within the options section. This would made the steps listed there even simpler. ** Affects: bind9 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to bind9 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/782614 Title: make configuring DNSSEC validation easier -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 782614] [NEW] make configuring DNSSEC validation easier
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: bind9 As noted here: http://wiki.debian.org/DNSSEC#BIND9 The are some configuration changes required to enable DNSSEC validation. I think it would be nicer if things could be made easier. Create an empty file /etc/bind/named.conf.keys Include the file in /etc/bind/named.conf Include a commented out entry in /etc/bind/named.conf.options of: // dnssec-validation yes; within the options section. This would made the steps listed there even simpler. ** Affects: bind9 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/782614 Title: make configuring DNSSEC validation easier -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 700945] Re: backport of patch for error message undefined method `closed?' for Nil:NilClass required.
Hi guys, I am very happy to confirm that this worked great. First it was gave me an indication that the remote server was not responding (as per http://bitcube.co.uk/content/puppet-errors-explained) and then it correclt diagnosed a mismatched server identity. Thanks for getting this fix in. Regards, Anand On 16 April 2011 20:38, Clint Byrum cl...@fewbar.com wrote: Oliver thats great! We usually try to get some third party who did not develop the fix to verify the proposed packages before marking it as verification done. Anand, are you still affected by the original problem, and if so, would you be willing to try out the package from lucid-proposed? -- You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber of the bug. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/700945 Title: backport of patch for error message undefined method `closed?' for Nil:NilClass required. Status in puppet: Fix Released Status in “puppet” package in Ubuntu: Fix Released Status in “puppet” source package in Lucid: Fix Committed Bug description: Binary package hint: puppet Hi, There are many versions of puppet, fortunately lucid (10.04) has a relatively new version (merely called legacy from puppetlabs). Unfortunately it has a number of bugs / issues, one of which I have recently encountered is an underlying bug in Ruby (and OpenSSL) on Lucid. However, the bug can be easily worked around, as noted two months after lucid's release. http://www.mailinglistarchive.com/html/puppet- us...@googlegroups.com/2010-06/msg00206.html Basically, upgrading to the latest available version of puppet in the 'legacy' series will resolve the issue. To unsubscribe from this bug, go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/puppet/+bug/700945/+subscribe -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to puppet in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/700945 Title: backport of patch for error message undefined method `closed?' for Nil:NilClass required. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
Re: [Bug 700945] Re: backport of patch for error message undefined method `closed?' for Nil:NilClass required.
Hi guys, I am very happy to confirm that this worked great. First it was gave me an indication that the remote server was not responding (as per http://bitcube.co.uk/content/puppet-errors-explained) and then it correclt diagnosed a mismatched server identity. Thanks for getting this fix in. Regards, Anand On 16 April 2011 20:38, Clint Byrum cl...@fewbar.com wrote: Oliver thats great! We usually try to get some third party who did not develop the fix to verify the proposed packages before marking it as verification done. Anand, are you still affected by the original problem, and if so, would you be willing to try out the package from lucid-proposed? -- You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber of the bug. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/700945 Title: backport of patch for error message undefined method `closed?' for Nil:NilClass required. Status in puppet: Fix Released Status in “puppet” package in Ubuntu: Fix Released Status in “puppet” source package in Lucid: Fix Committed Bug description: Binary package hint: puppet Hi, There are many versions of puppet, fortunately lucid (10.04) has a relatively new version (merely called legacy from puppetlabs). Unfortunately it has a number of bugs / issues, one of which I have recently encountered is an underlying bug in Ruby (and OpenSSL) on Lucid. However, the bug can be easily worked around, as noted two months after lucid's release. http://www.mailinglistarchive.com/html/puppet- us...@googlegroups.com/2010-06/msg00206.html Basically, upgrading to the latest available version of puppet in the 'legacy' series will resolve the issue. To unsubscribe from this bug, go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/puppet/+bug/700945/+subscribe -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/700945 Title: backport of patch for error message undefined method `closed?' for Nil:NilClass required. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 598597] Re: Vinagre closes connection to tightvncserver 2.0 beta4 immediately
This is an off-by-one snprintf fix; I think this warrants being backported to Ubuntu 10.04 LTS (Lucid) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/598597 Title: Vinagre closes connection to tightvncserver 2.0 beta4 immediately -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 598597] Re: Vinagre closes connection to tightvncserver 2.0 beta4 immediately
In Lucid's case the file is src/gvnc.c but I can confirm it works when gtk-vnc is rebuilt. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/598597 Title: Vinagre closes connection to tightvncserver 2.0 beta4 immediately -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 729780] [NEW] bind9 fails to create pid file.
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: bind9 1. root@ns3:~# lsb_release -rd Description:Ubuntu 10.04.2 LTS Release:10.04 2. ot@ns3:~# apt-cache policy bind9 bind9: Installed: 1:9.7.0.dfsg.P1-1ubuntu0.1 Candidate: 1:9.7.0.dfsg.P1-1ubuntu0.1 Version table: *** 1:9.7.0.dfsg.P1-1ubuntu0.1 0 500 http://gb.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ lucid-updates/main Packages 500 http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ lucid-security/main Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status 1:9.7.0.dfsg.P1-1 0 500 http://ubuntu.positive-internet.com/ubuntu/ lucid/main Packages 500 http://gb.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ lucid/main Packages 3. I expected bind to create a pid file. 4. bind9 did not create a pid file. Here are the default when installing from scratch, and 'apt-get install bind9'. root@ns3:~# ps aux | grep bind root 4138 0.0 0.2 6156 736 pts/0S+ 18:27 0:00 grep bind root@ns3:~# ls -l /var/run/ total 44 drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 60 Mar 5 14:50 ConsoleKit -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 4 Mar 4 06:36 collectdmon.pid -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 5 Mar 4 06:37 console-kit-daemon.pid -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 4 Mar 4 06:36 crond.pid -- 1 root root 0 Mar 4 06:36 crond.reboot drwxr-xr-x 2 messagebus messagebus 80 Mar 4 06:36 dbus drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 80 Mar 4 06:36 fail2ban -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 3 Mar 4 06:36 memcached.pid -rw-r--r-- 1 root root187 Mar 5 14:50 motd drwxrwxr-x 2 root bind 40 Nov 30 20:35 named running bind9 results in: Mar 5 18:27:47 ns3 named[4154]: starting BIND 9.7.0-P1 -u bind Mar 5 18:27:47 ns3 named[4154]: built with '--prefix=/usr' '--mandir=/usr/share/man' '--infodir=/usr/share/info' '--sysconfdir=/etc/bind' '--localstatedir=/var' '--en able-threads' '--enable-largefile' '--with-libtool' '--enable-shared' '--enable-static' '--with-openssl=/usr' '--with-gssapi=/usr' '--with-gnu-ld' '--with-dlz-postgres =no' '--with-dlz-mysql=no' '--with-dlz-bdb=yes' '--with-dlz-filesystem=yes' '--with-dlz-ldap=yes' '--with-dlz-stub=yes' '--with-geoip=/usr' '--enable-ipv6' 'CFLAGS=-fn o-strict-aliasing -DDIG_SIGCHASE -O2' 'LDFLAGS=-Wl,-Bsymbolic-functions' 'CPPFLAGS=' Mar 5 18:27:47 ns3 named[4154]: adjusted limit on open files from 1024 to 1048576 Mar 5 18:27:47 ns3 named[4154]: found 1 CPU, using 1 worker thread Mar 5 18:27:47 ns3 named[4154]: using up to 4096 sockets Mar 5 18:27:47 ns3 named[4154]: loading configuration from '/etc/bind/named.conf' Mar 5 18:27:47 ns3 named[4154]: reading built-in trusted keys from file '/etc/bind/bind.keys' Mar 5 18:27:47 ns3 named[4154]: using default UDP/IPv4 port range: [1024, 65535] Mar 5 18:27:47 ns3 named[4154]: using default UDP/IPv6 port range: [1024, 65535] Mar 5 18:27:47 ns3 named[4154]: listening on IPv6 interfaces, port 53 Mar 5 18:27:47 ns3 named[4154]: listening on IPv4 interface lo, 127.0.0.1#53 Mar 5 18:27:47 ns3 named[4154]: listening on IPv4 interface eth0, 95.172.29.74#53 Mar 5 18:27:47 ns3 named[4154]: Could not open '/var/run/named/named.pid'. Mar 5 18:27:47 ns3 named[4154]: Please check file and directory permissions or reconfigure the filename. Mar 5 18:27:47 ns3 named[4154]: could not open file '/var/run/named/named.pid': Permission denied Mar 5 18:27:47 ns3 named[4154]: generating session key for dynamic DNS Mar 5 18:27:47 ns3 named[4154]: Could not open '/var/run/named/session.key'. Mar 5 18:27:47 ns3 named[4154]: Please check file and directory permissions or reconfigure the filename. Mar 5 18:27:47 ns3 named[4154]: could not open file '/var/run/named/session.key': Permission denied Mar 5 18:27:47 ns3 named[4154]: could not create /var/run/named/session.key Mar 5 18:27:47 ns3 named[4154]: failed to generate session key for dynamic DNS: permission denied Mar 5 18:27:47 ns3 named[4154]: automatic empty zone: 254.169.IN-ADDR.ARPA root@ns3:~# ps aux | grep bind bind 4154 0.1 5.1 119468 12864 ?Ssl 18:27 0:00 /usr/sbin/named -u bind root 4169 0.0 0.2 6156 740 pts/0S+ 18:28 0:00 grep bind OK - so it is running as the user bind. Let's chown the directory to that user: root@ns3:~# chown bind: /var/run/named/ root@ns3:~# ls -la /var/run/ total 48 drwxr-xr-x 11 root root440 Mar 5 14:50 . drwxr-xr-x 15 root root 4096 Mar 4 05:21 .. drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 60 Mar 5 14:50 ConsoleKit -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 4 Mar 4 06:36 collectdmon.pid -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 5 Mar 4 06:37 console-kit-daemon.pid -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 4 Mar 4 06:36 crond.pid -- 1 root root 0 Mar 4 06:36 crond.reboot drwxr-xr-x 2 messagebus messagebus 80 Mar 4 06:36 dbus drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 80 Mar 4 06:36 fail2ban -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 3 Mar 4 06:36 memcached.pid
[Bug 729780] [NEW] bind9 fails to create pid file.
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: bind9 1. root@ns3:~# lsb_release -rd Description:Ubuntu 10.04.2 LTS Release:10.04 2. ot@ns3:~# apt-cache policy bind9 bind9: Installed: 1:9.7.0.dfsg.P1-1ubuntu0.1 Candidate: 1:9.7.0.dfsg.P1-1ubuntu0.1 Version table: *** 1:9.7.0.dfsg.P1-1ubuntu0.1 0 500 http://gb.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ lucid-updates/main Packages 500 http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ lucid-security/main Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status 1:9.7.0.dfsg.P1-1 0 500 http://ubuntu.positive-internet.com/ubuntu/ lucid/main Packages 500 http://gb.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ lucid/main Packages 3. I expected bind to create a pid file. 4. bind9 did not create a pid file. Here are the default when installing from scratch, and 'apt-get install bind9'. root@ns3:~# ps aux | grep bind root 4138 0.0 0.2 6156 736 pts/0S+ 18:27 0:00 grep bind root@ns3:~# ls -l /var/run/ total 44 drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 60 Mar 5 14:50 ConsoleKit -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 4 Mar 4 06:36 collectdmon.pid -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 5 Mar 4 06:37 console-kit-daemon.pid -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 4 Mar 4 06:36 crond.pid -- 1 root root 0 Mar 4 06:36 crond.reboot drwxr-xr-x 2 messagebus messagebus 80 Mar 4 06:36 dbus drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 80 Mar 4 06:36 fail2ban -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 3 Mar 4 06:36 memcached.pid -rw-r--r-- 1 root root187 Mar 5 14:50 motd drwxrwxr-x 2 root bind 40 Nov 30 20:35 named running bind9 results in: Mar 5 18:27:47 ns3 named[4154]: starting BIND 9.7.0-P1 -u bind Mar 5 18:27:47 ns3 named[4154]: built with '--prefix=/usr' '--mandir=/usr/share/man' '--infodir=/usr/share/info' '--sysconfdir=/etc/bind' '--localstatedir=/var' '--en able-threads' '--enable-largefile' '--with-libtool' '--enable-shared' '--enable-static' '--with-openssl=/usr' '--with-gssapi=/usr' '--with-gnu-ld' '--with-dlz-postgres =no' '--with-dlz-mysql=no' '--with-dlz-bdb=yes' '--with-dlz-filesystem=yes' '--with-dlz-ldap=yes' '--with-dlz-stub=yes' '--with-geoip=/usr' '--enable-ipv6' 'CFLAGS=-fn o-strict-aliasing -DDIG_SIGCHASE -O2' 'LDFLAGS=-Wl,-Bsymbolic-functions' 'CPPFLAGS=' Mar 5 18:27:47 ns3 named[4154]: adjusted limit on open files from 1024 to 1048576 Mar 5 18:27:47 ns3 named[4154]: found 1 CPU, using 1 worker thread Mar 5 18:27:47 ns3 named[4154]: using up to 4096 sockets Mar 5 18:27:47 ns3 named[4154]: loading configuration from '/etc/bind/named.conf' Mar 5 18:27:47 ns3 named[4154]: reading built-in trusted keys from file '/etc/bind/bind.keys' Mar 5 18:27:47 ns3 named[4154]: using default UDP/IPv4 port range: [1024, 65535] Mar 5 18:27:47 ns3 named[4154]: using default UDP/IPv6 port range: [1024, 65535] Mar 5 18:27:47 ns3 named[4154]: listening on IPv6 interfaces, port 53 Mar 5 18:27:47 ns3 named[4154]: listening on IPv4 interface lo, 127.0.0.1#53 Mar 5 18:27:47 ns3 named[4154]: listening on IPv4 interface eth0, 95.172.29.74#53 Mar 5 18:27:47 ns3 named[4154]: Could not open '/var/run/named/named.pid'. Mar 5 18:27:47 ns3 named[4154]: Please check file and directory permissions or reconfigure the filename. Mar 5 18:27:47 ns3 named[4154]: could not open file '/var/run/named/named.pid': Permission denied Mar 5 18:27:47 ns3 named[4154]: generating session key for dynamic DNS Mar 5 18:27:47 ns3 named[4154]: Could not open '/var/run/named/session.key'. Mar 5 18:27:47 ns3 named[4154]: Please check file and directory permissions or reconfigure the filename. Mar 5 18:27:47 ns3 named[4154]: could not open file '/var/run/named/session.key': Permission denied Mar 5 18:27:47 ns3 named[4154]: could not create /var/run/named/session.key Mar 5 18:27:47 ns3 named[4154]: failed to generate session key for dynamic DNS: permission denied Mar 5 18:27:47 ns3 named[4154]: automatic empty zone: 254.169.IN-ADDR.ARPA root@ns3:~# ps aux | grep bind bind 4154 0.1 5.1 119468 12864 ?Ssl 18:27 0:00 /usr/sbin/named -u bind root 4169 0.0 0.2 6156 740 pts/0S+ 18:28 0:00 grep bind OK - so it is running as the user bind. Let's chown the directory to that user: root@ns3:~# chown bind: /var/run/named/ root@ns3:~# ls -la /var/run/ total 48 drwxr-xr-x 11 root root440 Mar 5 14:50 . drwxr-xr-x 15 root root 4096 Mar 4 05:21 .. drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 60 Mar 5 14:50 ConsoleKit -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 4 Mar 4 06:36 collectdmon.pid -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 5 Mar 4 06:37 console-kit-daemon.pid -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 4 Mar 4 06:36 crond.pid -- 1 root root 0 Mar 4 06:36 crond.reboot drwxr-xr-x 2 messagebus messagebus 80 Mar 4 06:36 dbus drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 80 Mar 4 06:36 fail2ban -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 3 Mar 4 06:36 memcached.pid
[Bug 711299] [NEW] ipv6 routes which expire are not deleted quickly
Public bug reported: On an IPv6 network, routes have a marked lifetime. So, if you are connected to two IPv6 networks you may have multiple default routes. Not such a problem. kalki:[~]% ip -6 route 2001:44b8:75ee:19d2::/64 dev eth1 proto kernel metric 256 expires 22sec mtu 1500 advmss 1440 hoplimit 4294967295 fe80::/64 dev virbr0 proto kernel metric 256 mtu 1500 advmss 1440 hoplimit 4294967295 fe80::/64 dev eth0 proto kernel metric 256 mtu 1500 advmss 1440 hoplimit 4294967295 fe80::/64 dev eth1 proto kernel metric 256 mtu 1500 advmss 1440 hoplimit 4294967295 default via fe80::200:ff:fe00:0 dev eth1 proto kernel metric 1024 expires 22sec mtu 1500 advmss 1440 hoplimit 64 default via fe80::203:47ff:fe8b:66f4 dev eth0 proto kernel metric 1024 expires 24sec mtu 1500 advmss 1440 hoplimit 64 [ what is odd is that eth0 has no link route on it, but whatever this bug is not about that ] Note the expiration times on each route, and let's do this again: kalki:[~]% ip -6 route 2001:44b8:75ee:19d2::/64 dev eth1 proto kernel metric 256 expires 17sec mtu 1500 advmss 1440 hoplimit 4294967295 fe80::/64 dev virbr0 proto kernel metric 256 mtu 1500 advmss 1440 hoplimit 4294967295 fe80::/64 dev eth0 proto kernel metric 256 mtu 1500 advmss 1440 hoplimit 4294967295 fe80::/64 dev eth1 proto kernel metric 256 mtu 1500 advmss 1440 hoplimit 4294967295 default via fe80::200:ff:fe00:0 dev eth1 proto kernel metric 1024 expires 17sec mtu 1500 advmss 1440 hoplimit 64 default via fe80::203:47ff:fe8b:66f4 dev eth0 proto kernel metric 1024 expires 1sec mtu 1500 advmss 1440 hoplimit 64 kalki:[~]% ip -6 route 2001:44b8:75ee:19d2::/64 dev eth1 proto kernel metric 256 expires 16sec mtu 1500 advmss 1440 hoplimit 4294967295 fe80::/64 dev virbr0 proto kernel metric 256 mtu 1500 advmss 1440 hoplimit 4294967295 fe80::/64 dev eth0 proto kernel metric 256 mtu 1500 advmss 1440 hoplimit 4294967295 fe80::/64 dev eth1 proto kernel metric 256 mtu 1500 advmss 1440 hoplimit 4294967295 default via fe80::200:ff:fe00:0 dev eth1 proto kernel metric 1024 expires 16sec mtu 1500 advmss 1440 hoplimit 64 default via fe80::203:47ff:fe8b:66f4 dev eth0 proto kernel metric 1024 expires 0sec mtu 1500 advmss 1440 hoplimit 64 kalki:[~]% ip -6 route 2001:44b8:75ee:19d2::/64 dev eth1 proto kernel metric 256 expires 16sec mtu 1500 advmss 1440 hoplimit 4294967295 fe80::/64 dev virbr0 proto kernel metric 256 mtu 1500 advmss 1440 hoplimit 4294967295 fe80::/64 dev eth0 proto kernel metric 256 mtu 1500 advmss 1440 hoplimit 4294967295 fe80::/64 dev eth1 proto kernel metric 256 mtu 1500 advmss 1440 hoplimit 4294967295 default via fe80::200:ff:fe00:0 dev eth1 proto kernel metric 1024 expires 16sec mtu 1500 advmss 1440 hoplimit 64 default via fe80::203:47ff:fe8b:66f4 dev eth0 proto kernel metric 1024 expires 0sec mtu 1500 advmss 1440 hoplimit 64 kalki:[~]% ip -6 route 2001:44b8:75ee:19d2::/64 dev eth1 proto kernel metric 256 expires 15sec mtu 1500 advmss 1440 hoplimit 4294967295 fe80::/64 dev virbr0 proto kernel metric 256 mtu 1500 advmss 1440 hoplimit 4294967295 fe80::/64 dev eth0 proto kernel metric 256 mtu 1500 advmss 1440 hoplimit 4294967295 fe80::/64 dev eth1 proto kernel metric 256 mtu 1500 advmss 1440 hoplimit 4294967295 default via fe80::200:ff:fe00:0 dev eth1 proto kernel metric 1024 expires 15sec mtu 1500 advmss 1440 hoplimit 64 default via fe80::203:47ff:fe8b:66f4 dev eth0 proto kernel metric 1024 expires 21474836sec mtu 1500 advmss 1440 hoplimit 64 kalki:[~]% ip -6 route 2001:44b8:75ee:19d2::/64 dev eth1 proto kernel metric 256 expires 14sec mtu 1500 advmss 1440 hoplimit 4294967295 fe80::/64 dev virbr0 proto kernel metric 256 mtu 1500 advmss 1440 hoplimit 4294967295 fe80::/64 dev eth0 proto kernel metric 256 mtu 1500 advmss 1440 hoplimit 4294967295 fe80::/64 dev eth1 proto kernel metric 256 mtu 1500 advmss 1440 hoplimit 4294967295 default via fe80::200:ff:fe00:0 dev eth1 proto kernel metric 1024 expires 14sec mtu 1500 advmss 1440 hoplimit 64 default via fe80::203:47ff:fe8b:66f4 dev eth0 proto kernel metric 1024 expires 21474836sec mtu 1500 advmss 1440 hoplimit 64 That route (on dev eth0) has 'expired' but the time seems to have gone to infinity. It stays there for a while - after a few minutes (the time it took the collect this information, submit to lauchpad and me login) the route disappears. But it seems to be taking a longer time that you would expect. Well, certainly I would expect. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04 Package: linux-image (not installed) Regression: No Reproducible: Yes ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-28.55-generic 2.6.32.27+drm33.12 Uname: Linux 2.6.32-28-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: wl nvidia AlsaVersion: Advanced Linux Sound Architecture Driver Version 1.0.21. AplayDevices: List of PLAYBACK Hardware Devices card 0: Intel [HDA Intel], device 0: STAC92xx Analog
[Bug 711299] Re: ipv6 routes which expire are not deleted quickly
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/711299 Title: ipv6 routes which expire are not deleted quickly -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 104525] Re: default ntp.conf should use pool.ntp.org servers
See if you can contact someone from the Canonical server team. Personally I'd also try to contact the ntp maintainer via IRC too. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to ntp in ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/104525 Title: default ntp.conf should use pool.ntp.org servers -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 104525] Re: default ntp.conf should use pool.ntp.org servers
See if you can contact someone from the Canonical server team. Personally I'd also try to contact the ntp maintainer via IRC too. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/104525 Title: default ntp.conf should use pool.ntp.org servers -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 700945] [NEW] puppet 0.25.5 backport required
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: puppet Hi, There are many versions of puppet, fortunately lucid (10.04) has a relatively new version (merely called legacy from puppetlabs). Unfortunately it has a number of bugs / issues, one of which I have recently encountered is an underlying bug in Ruby (and OpenSSL) on Lucid. However, the bug can be easily worked around, as noted two months after lucid's release. http://www.mailinglistarchive.com/html/puppet- us...@googlegroups.com/2010-06/msg00206.html Basically, upgrading to the latest available version of puppet in the 'legacy' series will resolve the issue. ** Affects: puppet (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to puppet in ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/700945 Title: puppet 0.25.5 backport required -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 700945] [NEW] puppet 0.25.5 backport required
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: puppet Hi, There are many versions of puppet, fortunately lucid (10.04) has a relatively new version (merely called legacy from puppetlabs). Unfortunately it has a number of bugs / issues, one of which I have recently encountered is an underlying bug in Ruby (and OpenSSL) on Lucid. However, the bug can be easily worked around, as noted two months after lucid's release. http://www.mailinglistarchive.com/html/puppet- us...@googlegroups.com/2010-06/msg00206.html Basically, upgrading to the latest available version of puppet in the 'legacy' series will resolve the issue. ** Affects: puppet (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/700945 Title: puppet 0.25.5 backport required -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 420900] Re: grub2 error detecting Fedorainitrd
StabeUpdateRequest for Ubuntu 10.04 LTS. IMPACT: As additional distributions switch to generating their initrd using dracut, grub2 will become unable to boot them. FIXED: The bug has been fixed upstream in os-prober version 1.39 (included in Ubuntu 10.10) As the bug has been fixed in a newer version of os-prober in a released version of ubuntu, a rebuild of os-prober 1.39 for Ubuntu 10.04 should enable access to dracut-style initramfs. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/420900 Title: grub2 error detecting Fedorainitrd -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 675573] Re: fails to suspend / resume on certified hardware
As an interesting data point, I installed the propreitary NVidia drivers and suspend / resume work perfectly (same kernel). So I think that this is related to how Noveau does something. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/675573 Title: fails to suspend / resume on certified hardware -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 675573] Re: fails to suspend / resume on certified hardware
Hi Jeremy, I read the wiki page you indicated. (It would be good if you could duplicate this bug and file it against the appropriate web person to have this machine removed from the certified list -- since it seems to be incorrect). According to that page, I looked at: http://kernel.ubuntu.com/~kernel-ppa/info/kernel-version-map.html to identify the most appropriate kernel. I am running lucid - so I think the most appropriate kernel version would be: Lucid (master -0) Ubuntu Kernel Version Mainline Kernel Version TIP 2.6.32.26+drm33.12 2.6.32-27.492.6.32.26+drm33.12 Reading that document further, it indicates that the simplest way to install this is to look in: http://kernel.ubuntu.com/~kernel-ppa/mainline/daily/current/ Where, it says, Each build directory contains the header and image .deb files for the i386 and amd64 architectures, generic flavour. Unfortunately that directory does not contain any images. In fact, I have to go back to 'http://kernel.ubuntu.com/~kernel- ppa/mainline/daily/2010-11-22-natty/' in order to find any. Actually that was the ONLY directory that did contain kernel images. Note that there appears to be nothing related to '-lucid' in the mainline directory. Could you confirm that this test will actually be useful since the kernel in lucid in unlikely to ever become the kernel being used in maverick or natty. Thanks, Anand P.S. Not an automated message. ** Tags removed: needs-upstream-testing ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/675573 Title: fails to suspend / resume on certified hardware -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 675573] [NEW] fails to suspend / resume on certified hardware
Public bug reported: Hi, Ubuntu fails to correctly suspend / resume on this device. Despite is being marked as certified. I am unclear if the certification is done by the vendor or Canonical. But http://webapps.ubuntu.com/certification/hardware/201001-4955/ is clearly not correct. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04 Package: linux-image (not installed) Regression: No Reproducible: Yes ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-26.46-generic 2.6.32.24+drm33.11 Uname: Linux 2.6.32-26-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: wl AlsaVersion: Advanced Linux Sound Architecture Driver Version 1.0.21. AplayDevices: List of PLAYBACK Hardware Devices card 0: Intel [HDA Intel], device 0: STAC92xx Analog [STAC92xx Analog] Subdevices: 0/1 Subdevice #0: subdevice #0 Architecture: amd64 ArecordDevices: List of CAPTURE Hardware Devices card 0: Intel [HDA Intel], device 0: STAC92xx Analog [STAC92xx Analog] Subdevices: 2/2 Subdevice #0: subdevice #0 Subdevice #1: subdevice #1 AudioDevicesInUse: USERPID ACCESS COMMAND /dev/snd/controlC0: anand 2311 F pulseaudio CRDA: Error: [Errno 2] No such file or directory Card0.Amixer.info: Card hw:0 'Intel'/'HDA Intel at 0xfbe0 irq 22' Mixer name : 'IDT 92HD81B1X5' Components : 'HDA:111d7605,1028043f,00100104' Controls : 18 Simple ctrls : 12 Card1.Amixer.info: Card hw:1 'NVidia'/'HDA NVidia at 0xfb08 irq 16' Mixer name : 'Nvidia ID b' Components : 'HDA:10de000b,10de0101,00100100' Controls : 0 Simple ctrls : 0 Card1.Amixer.values: Date: Mon Nov 15 14:50:54 2010 HibernationDevice: RESUME=UUID=d1f50e6c-c7ed-4a59-b9dc-4695b5d20ff5 InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.04 LTS Lucid Lynx - Release amd64 (20100429) MachineType: Dell Inc. Vostro 3300 ProcCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-2.6.32-26-generic root=UUID=5e5dbc25-bc60-422e-9227-9ede108329e7 ro quiet splash ProcEnviron: PATH=(custom, user) LANG=en_AU.utf8 SHELL=/bin/zsh RelatedPackageVersions: linux-firmware 1.34.1 RfKill: 2: hci0: Bluetooth Soft blocked: no Hard blocked: no SourcePackage: linux dmi.bios.date: 09/16/2010 dmi.bios.vendor: Dell Inc. dmi.bios.version: A09 dmi.board.name: 07JC8T dmi.board.vendor: Dell Inc. dmi.board.version: A00 dmi.chassis.type: 8 dmi.chassis.vendor: Dell Inc. dmi.chassis.version: Not Specified dmi.modalias: dmi:bvnDellInc.:bvrA09:bd09/16/2010:svnDellInc.:pnVostro3300:pvrNotSpecified:rvnDellInc.:rn07JC8T:rvrA00:cvnDellInc.:ct8:cvrNotSpecified: dmi.product.name: Vostro 3300 dmi.product.version: Not Specified dmi.sys.vendor: Dell Inc. ** Affects: linux (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug lucid needs-upstream-testing resume suspend -- fails to suspend / resume on certified hardware https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/675573 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 675573] Re: fails to suspend / resume on certified hardware
-- fails to suspend / resume on certified hardware https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/675573 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 653478] Re: 10.10 RC wubi install fails on Windows XP SP3
Without an explanation as to why this marked, remarking as 'new'. I have experienced this error (Error 22) when wubi has finished copying the files but not completed setup of the boot environment. Thus leaving the user without a working install when done via wubi. ** Changed in: ubuntu Status: Invalid = New -- 10.10 RC wubi install fails on Windows XP SP3 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/653478 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 654468] Re: uno-libs3 has no changelog
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/654468/+attachment/1671048/+files/Dependencies.txt -- uno-libs3 has no changelog https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/654468 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 654468] [NEW] uno-libs3 has no changelog
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: openoffice.org In update-manager, uno-libs3 is offered as an update but displays nothing in the 'changes' section: Changes for the versions: 1.6.1+OOo3.2.1-6ubuntu1 1.6.1+OOo3.2.1-7ubuntu1 The list of changes is not available yet. Please use http://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openoffice.org/1.6.1+OOo3.2.1-7ubuntu1/+changelog until the changes become available or try again later. The URL given does not work. The changelog has not been appearing for a while now. Anand ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.10 Package: uno-libs3 1.6.1+OOo3.2.1-6ubuntu1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.35-22.33-generic 2.6.35.4 Uname: Linux 2.6.35-22-generic x86_64 Architecture: amd64 Date: Mon Oct 4 10:27:16 2010 InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.04 LTS Lucid Lynx - Release amd64 (20100429) ProcEnviron: LANG=en_GB.utf8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: openoffice.org ** Affects: openoffice.org (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug maverick ubuntu-une -- uno-libs3 has no changelog https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/654468 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 640432] Re: X does not start (nouveau)
OK - sorry that I've been unable to update this bug. I have four kernels on my system (currently). kernel | attempt 1 | attempt 2 | attempt 3 -- 2.6.32-24-gen| good| good| good 2.6.35-19-gen| bad | bad | bad 2.6.35-20-gen| good| bad | good 2.6.35-22-gen| bad | bad | good The only reason I even tried multiple boot attempts was when I was writing down 2.6.35-20 and 2.6.35-22 I wanted to re-confirm that the results I had. And they differed. Let me know if I should try any additional kernel versions. -- X does not start (nouveau) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/640432 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 640432] Re: X does not start (nouveau)
Sure - in progress. It appears that Launchpad relies on a text browser to support button type=submit ... in order to authenticate. Which w3m does not support. (sigh.) -- X does not start (nouveau) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/640432 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 640432] Dependencies.txt
apport information ** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/bugs/640432/+attachment/1621691/+files/Dependencies.txt -- X does not start (nouveau) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/640432 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 640432] GdmLog1.txt
apport information ** Attachment added: GdmLog1.txt https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/bugs/640432/+attachment/1621693/+files/GdmLog1.txt -- X does not start (nouveau) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/640432 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 640432] GdmLog2.txt
apport information ** Attachment added: GdmLog2.txt https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/bugs/640432/+attachment/1621694/+files/GdmLog2.txt -- X does not start (nouveau) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/640432 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 640432] UdevDb.txt
apport information ** Attachment added: UdevDb.txt https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/bugs/640432/+attachment/1621702/+files/UdevDb.txt -- X does not start (nouveau) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/640432 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 640432] DRM.card0.DVI.I.1.txt
apport information ** Attachment added: DRM.card0.DVI.I.1.txt https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/bugs/640432/+attachment/1621690/+files/DRM.card0.DVI.I.1.txt -- X does not start (nouveau) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/640432 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 640432] Lspci.txt
apport information ** Attachment added: Lspci.txt https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/bugs/640432/+attachment/1621695/+files/Lspci.txt -- X does not start (nouveau) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/640432 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 640432] Lsusb.txt
apport information ** Attachment added: Lsusb.txt https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/bugs/640432/+attachment/1621696/+files/Lsusb.txt -- X does not start (nouveau) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/640432 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 640432] ProcCpuinfo.txt
apport information ** Attachment added: ProcCpuinfo.txt https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/bugs/640432/+attachment/1621698/+files/ProcCpuinfo.txt -- X does not start (nouveau) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/640432 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 640432] ProcInterrupts.txt
apport information ** Attachment added: ProcInterrupts.txt https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/bugs/640432/+attachment/1621699/+files/ProcInterrupts.txt -- X does not start (nouveau) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/640432 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 640432] PciDisplay.txt
apport information ** Attachment added: PciDisplay.txt https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/bugs/640432/+attachment/1621697/+files/PciDisplay.txt -- X does not start (nouveau) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/640432 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 640432] XorgLogOld.txt
apport information ** Attachment added: XorgLogOld.txt https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/bugs/640432/+attachment/1621705/+files/XorgLogOld.txt -- X does not start (nouveau) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/640432 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 640432] GdmLog.txt
apport information ** Attachment added: GdmLog.txt https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/bugs/640432/+attachment/1621692/+files/GdmLog.txt -- X does not start (nouveau) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/640432 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 640432] RelatedPackageVersions.txt
apport information ** Attachment added: RelatedPackageVersions.txt https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/bugs/640432/+attachment/1621701/+files/RelatedPackageVersions.txt -- X does not start (nouveau) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/640432 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 640432] Re: X does not start (nouveau)
apport information
** Tags added: apport-collected
** Description changed:
X no longer starts when using linux-image-2.6.35-20-generic (2.6.35-20.29)
but X starts when using
linux-image-2.6.32-24-generic (2.6.32-24.42)
I am using the free Noveau drivers.
ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.10
Package: linux-image-2.6.35-20-generic 2.6.35-20.29
Regression: Yes
Reproducible: No
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-24.42-generic 2.6.32.15+drm33.5
Uname: Linux 2.6.32-24-generic x86_64
AlsaVersion: Advanced Linux Sound Architecture Driver Version 1.0.21.
AplayDevices:
List of PLAYBACK Hardware Devices
card 0: Intel [HDA Intel], device 0: ALC262 Analog [ALC262 Analog]
Subdevices: 0/1
Subdevice #0: subdevice #0
Architecture: amd64
ArecordDevices:
List of CAPTURE Hardware Devices
card 0: Intel [HDA Intel], device 0: ALC262 Analog [ALC262 Analog]
Subdevices: 1/1
Subdevice #0: subdevice #0
AudioDevicesInUse:
USERPID ACCESS COMMAND
/dev/snd/controlC0: kumriaa3021 F pulseaudio
/dev/snd/pcmC0D0p: kumriaa3021 F...m pulseaudio
CRDA: Error: [Errno 2] No such file or directory
Card0.Amixer.info:
Card hw:0 'Intel'/'HDA Intel at 0xf320 irq 21'
Mixer name : 'Realtek ALC262'
Components : 'HDA:10ec0262,103c1308,00100202'
Controls : 31
Simple ctrls : 19
Date: Thu Sep 16 13:28:46 2010
Frequency: Once a day.
HibernationDevice: RESUME=UUID=8976e69f-e46c-424a-9c13-b4ce09e93418
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.04 LTS Lucid Lynx - Release amd64 (20100429)
IwConfig:
lono wireless extensions.
eth0 no wireless extensions.
MachineType: Hewlett-Packard HP xw4600 Workstation
ProcCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-2.6.32-24-generic
root=UUID=2b3095f8-2cdd-4bb5-b1b6-be001b428bd9 ro quiet splash
ProcEnviron:
PATH=(custom, user)
LANG=en_GB.utf8
SHELL=/bin/bash
RelatedPackageVersions: linux-firmware 1.38
RfKill:
SourcePackage: linux
dmi.bios.date: 02/08/2010
dmi.bios.vendor: Hewlett-Packard
dmi.bios.version: 786F3 v01.21
dmi.board.asset.tag: CZC0180TF9
dmi.board.name: 0AA0h
dmi.board.vendor: Hewlett-Packard
dmi.chassis.asset.tag: CZC0180TF9
dmi.chassis.type: 6
dmi.chassis.vendor: Hewlett-Packard
dmi.modalias:
dmi:bvnHewlett-Packard:bvr786F3v01.21:bd02/08/2010:svnHewlett-Packard:pnHPxw4600Workstation:pvr:rvnHewlett-Packard:rn0AA0h:rvr:cvnHewlett-Packard:ct6:cvr:
dmi.product.name: HP xw4600 Workstation
dmi.sys.vendor: Hewlett-Packard
+ ---
+ Architecture: amd64
+ DRM.card0.DisplayPort.1:
+ status: connected
+ enabled: enabled
+ dpms: On
+ modes: 1280x1024 1280x960 1024x768 800x600 640x480 720x400
+ edid-base64:
AP///wAi8FsoAQEBAQ8UAQOAJh6M7vawo1VMmyURUFShCACBQAEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBMCoAmFEAKkAwcBMAfCwRAAAe/QAyTBhTDgAKICAgICAg/ABMQTE5NTEKICAgICAg/wBDTkMwMTVTN1lRCiAgADI=
+ DRM.card0.DisplayPort.2:
+ status: disconnected
+ enabled: disabled
+ dpms: Off
+ modes:
+ edid-base64:
+ DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.10
+ InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.04 LTS Lucid Lynx - Release amd64 (20100429)
+ MachineType: Hewlett-Packard HP xw4600 Workstation
+ Package: xserver-xorg-video-nouveau 1:0.0.16+git20100805+b96170a-0ubuntu1
+ PackageArchitecture: amd64
+ ProcCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-2.6.35-22-generic
root=UUID=2b3095f8-2cdd-4bb5-b1b6-be001b428bd9 ro quiet splash
+ ProcEnviron:
+ LANG=en_GB.UTF-8
+ SHELL=/bin/bash
+ ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.35-22.33-generic 2.6.35.4
+ Tags: maverick ubuntu-une maverick maverick ubuntu-une maverick
+ Uname: Linux 2.6.35-22-generic x86_64
+ UserGroups: adm admin cdrom dialout lpadmin plugdev sambashare
+ dmi.bios.date: 02/08/2010
+ dmi.bios.vendor: Hewlett-Packard
+ dmi.bios.version: 786F3 v01.21
+ dmi.board.asset.tag: CZC0180TF9
+ dmi.board.name: 0AA0h
+ dmi.board.vendor: Hewlett-Packard
+ dmi.chassis.asset.tag: CZC0180TF9
+ dmi.chassis.type: 6
+ dmi.chassis.vendor: Hewlett-Packard
+ dmi.modalias:
dmi:bvnHewlett-Packard:bvr786F3v01.21:bd02/08/2010:svnHewlett-Packard:pnHPxw4600Workstation:pvr:rvnHewlett-Packard:rn0AA0h:rvr:cvnHewlett-Packard:ct6:cvr:
+ dmi.product.name: HP xw4600 Workstation
+ dmi.sys.vendor: Hewlett-Packard
+ system:
+ distro: Ubuntu
+ codename: maverick
+ architecture: x86_64
+ kernel: 2.6.35-22-generic
** Attachment added: BootDmesg.txt
https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/bugs/640432/+attachment/1621688/+files/BootDmesg.txt
--
X does not start (nouveau)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/640432
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 640432] CurrentDmesg.txt
apport information ** Attachment added: CurrentDmesg.txt https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/bugs/640432/+attachment/1621689/+files/CurrentDmesg.txt -- X does not start (nouveau) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/640432 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 640432] ProcModules.txt
apport information ** Attachment added: ProcModules.txt https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/bugs/640432/+attachment/1621700/+files/ProcModules.txt -- X does not start (nouveau) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/640432 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 640432] UdevLog.txt
apport information ** Attachment added: UdevLog.txt https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/bugs/640432/+attachment/1621703/+files/UdevLog.txt -- X does not start (nouveau) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/640432 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 640432] XorgLog.txt
apport information ** Attachment added: XorgLog.txt https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/bugs/640432/+attachment/1621704/+files/XorgLog.txt -- X does not start (nouveau) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/640432 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 640432] Re: X does not start (nouveau)
** Changed in: xserver-xorg-video-nouveau (Ubuntu Maverick) Status: Incomplete = Confirmed -- X does not start (nouveau) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/640432 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 640432] Re: X does not start (noveau)
tried with 2.6.35-22.33; no change. I noticed this in the X log file: [12.064] (II) Initializing built-in extension GESTURE [12.068] (II) AIGLX error: dlopen of /usr/lib/dri/nouveau_dri.so failed (/usr/lib/dri/nouveau_dri.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory) [12.068] (II) AIGLX: reverting to software rendering [12.068] (II) AIGLX: Screen 0 is not DRI capable [12.070] (II) AIGLX: Loaded and initialized /usr/lib/dri/swrast_dri.so No idea if this is related. Please let me know if there is any further things I can test out. Thanks, Anand -- X does not start (noveau) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/640432 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 640432] Re: X does not start (nouveau)
** Summary changed: - X does not start (noveau) + X does not start (nouveau) -- X does not start (nouveau) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/640432 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
