[Bug 762693] Re: Enhanced zoom is laggy with Compiz 0.9.4
That solves the problem. Idk. I think the best solution for this would be to be able to lower the mouse polling interval for specific plugins (such as Enhanced Zoom) in a configurable fashion. To people familiar with Compiz: is mouse polling used often by other plugins? Does lowering the interval really make a difference in a battery drain? Is it possible to make the interval dynamic? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/762693 Title: Enhanced zoom is laggy with Compiz 0.9.4 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 698121] Re: xf86OpenConsole: VT_WAITACTIVE failed: Interrupted system call
It crashed for me today, as I was opening tabs in Firefox. This is all I could capture from the logs: [25.169] (II) VESA: driver for VESA chipsets: vesa [25.169] (II) FBDEV: driver for framebuffer: fbdev [25.169] (--) using VT number 1 [ 124.349] Fatal server error: [ 124.349] xf86OpenConsole: VT_WAITACTIVE failed: Interrupted system call [ 124.349] [ 124.349] Please consult the The X.Org Foundation support at http://wiki.x.org for help. [ 124.349] Please also check the log file at /var/log/Xorg.1.log for additional information. [ 124.349] -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/698121 Title: xf86OpenConsole: VT_WAITACTIVE failed: Interrupted system call -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 297042] [NEW] Cultivation package needs to use aoss.
Public bug reported: The cultivation package provided with Ubuntu Intrepid calls `/usr/games/cultivation` directly, but this will disable the sound in a default Ubuntu installation. A solution is to call `aoss /usr/games/cultivation` instead. From here there are two options: 1) Changing /usr/share/applications/cultivation.desktop, line 8 to Exec=aoss /usr/games/cultivation. 2) Create a wrapper for the binary that calls aoss. The wrapper would be something like: #!/usr/bin/env bash aoss /usr/share/games/cultivation/cultivation Where /usr/share/games/cultivation/cultivation is the actual binary. (Don't know what the directory and naming conventions are for this kind of thing.) This is a great game. :-D ** Affects: cultivation (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Cultivation package needs to use aoss. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/297042 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 213232] Re: youtube plugin in totem needs demuxer plugin
This is not fixed in Intrepid, at least not in my experience. When I double-click on a YouTube video in Totem, it does launch the Search for suitable codec? dialog and tries to install the codecs. The first option, ffmpeg plugin, is the one I chose. After downloading and installing, which took barely a minute, Totem tried playing the YouTube video, but after around 10 seconds of the clock pointer, it said, The playback of this video requires a flash demuxer plugin, which is not installed. I tried closing and opening Totem, then I tried playing the same video. It again opened the Search for suitable codec? dialog. This time only the other option, GStreamer plugins for mms, wavpack, quicktime, musepack; GStreamer plugins from the bad set was available. I selected it and, after downloading and installing, it finally worked. The ffmpeg plugin should be fixed or removed from the list. Unless this just happened to me? -- youtube plugin in totem needs demuxer plugin https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/213232 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 253196] Re: Bugfix upstream release of Lyx (1.5.6)
I really can't work on this right now, as I have a religious retreat this weekend and lots of school work surrounding it. Feel free to take over for me, Luca. :-) -- Bugfix upstream release of Lyx (1.5.6) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/253196 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 253196] Re: Bugfix upstream release of Lyx (1.5.6)
OK. So now I'm following the Sponsorship Process in the wiki. I am requesting sponsorship. (Couldn't find another way to say it. :P) Here is the .diff.gz file attached; the source can be found at ftp://ftp.lyx.org/pub/lyx/stable/lyx-1.5.6.tar.gz. The package is for intrepid; backporting shouldn't be a problem, as demonstrated by my PPA. ** Attachment added: lyx_1.5.6-0ubuntu1~ppa3.diff.gz http://launchpadlibrarian.net/17348153/lyx_1.5.6-0ubuntu1%7Eppa3.diff.gz -- Bugfix upstream release of Lyx (1.5.6) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/253196 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 253196] Re: Bugfix upstream release of Lyx (1.5.6)
I have created packages of lyx-1.5.6 for both Intrepid and Hardy on my PPA, at http://launchpad.net/~andresjriofrio/+archive. The hardy one is still building, so I haven't had the opportunity to test the program, but I don't expect any problems. In any case, I hope this helps the MOTU upgrade the official release. -- Bugfix upstream release of Lyx (1.5.6) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/253196 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 253196] Re: Bugfix upstream release of Lyx (1.5.6)
By the way, should the status be changed to Fix commited if the package proves appropriate? -- Bugfix upstream release of Lyx (1.5.6) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/253196 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 253196] Re: Bugfix upstream release of Lyx (1.5.6)
Reporting about my packages at http://launchpad.net/~andresjriofrio/+archive. At least the hardy one (which would probably go into hardy-backports) works properly. Now all that is left is for someone to `dch -i` it and upload it to the main distribution. (I would do it, but I don't have the proper signature nor permission, not being part of the MOTU team.) Again, should I change the status? -- Bugfix upstream release of Lyx (1.5.6) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/253196 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 208556] [NEW] qdbuscpp2xml uses moc-qt3 instead of moc-qt4
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: qt4-dev-tools When I run qdbuscpp2xml on my application.h it does not work. In the source package (qt4-x11-4.3.2/tools/qdbus/tools/qdbuscpp2xml/qdbuscpp2xml.cpp) it references the executable moc (on line 394) which by default (or at least on my system, in which I haven't changed anything) is a symlink to moc-qt3. And this causes the parser to not recognize public slots or signals (although it does recognize public Q_SLOTS and Q_SIGNALS). I use Ubuntu 7.10, And I have installed the kde4 package from the PPA. ** Affects: qt4-x11 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- qdbuscpp2xml uses moc-qt3 instead of moc-qt4 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/208556 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 208556] Re: qdbuscpp2xml uses moc-qt3 instead of moc-qt4
** Description changed: Binary package hint: qt4-dev-tools When I run qdbuscpp2xml on my application.h it does not work. In the source package (qt4-x11-4.3.2/tools/qdbus/tools/qdbuscpp2xml/qdbuscpp2xml.cpp) it references the executable moc (on line 394) which by default (or at - least on my system, in which I haven't changed anything) is a symlink to - moc-qt3. And this causes the parser to not recognize public slots or - signals (although it does recognize public Q_SLOTS and Q_SIGNALS). + least on my system, in which I haven't changed anything concerning QT) + is a symlink to moc-qt3. And this causes the parser to not recognize + public slots or signals (although it does recognize public Q_SLOTS + and Q_SIGNALS). I use Ubuntu 7.10, And I have installed the kde4 package from the PPA. ** Tags added: moc qdbus qdbuscpp2xml qt4 -- qdbuscpp2xml uses moc-qt3 instead of moc-qt4 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/208556 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kubuntu Team, which is subscribed to qt4-x11 in ubuntu. -- kubuntu-bugs mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kubuntu-bugs
[Bug 208556] Re: qdbuscpp2xml uses moc-qt3 instead of moc-qt4
** Description changed: Binary package hint: qt4-dev-tools When I run qdbuscpp2xml on my application.h it does not work. In the source package (qt4-x11-4.3.2/tools/qdbus/tools/qdbuscpp2xml/qdbuscpp2xml.cpp) it references the executable moc (on line 394) which by default (or at least on my system, in which I haven't changed anything concerning QT) is a symlink to moc-qt3. And this causes the parser to not recognize public slots or signals (although it does recognize public Q_SLOTS and Q_SIGNALS). I use Ubuntu 7.10, And I have installed the kde4 package from the PPA. + + I think this is fixed upstream in Debian: http://lists.debian.org + /debian-qt-kde/2007/03/msg00143.html -- qdbuscpp2xml uses moc-qt3 instead of moc-qt4 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/208556 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kubuntu Team, which is subscribed to qt4-x11 in ubuntu. -- kubuntu-bugs mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kubuntu-bugs
[Bug 208556] Re: qdbuscpp2xml uses moc-qt3 instead of moc-qt4
This can be fixed by replacing /moc with /moc-qt4 on line 394 of qt4-x11-4.3.2/tools/qdbus/tools/qdbuscpp2xml/qdbuscpp2xml.cpp (or at least that's how the Debian guys fixed it). I'm not sure how the dpatch and/or patch system works, though, so I was not able to create a patch. -- qdbuscpp2xml uses moc-qt3 instead of moc-qt4 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/208556 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 208556] Re: qdbuscpp2xml uses moc-qt3 instead of moc-qt4
Well in the end it was just my own ignorance... The patch was there but I just did apt-src install qt4-x11 and saw that the file referenced /moc instead of /moc-qt4, without knowing that the patches in debian/patches/ weren't gonna be applied until build time... I feel embarrased now. :D And the reason it wasn't working for me is because I was using KUrl instead of QString for a public slot I wanted to export to DBUS... -- qdbuscpp2xml uses moc-qt3 instead of moc-qt4 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/208556 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 117840] Re: Wishlist: Update python-soya package
Are there some (new) news about this? I just installed python-soya in my ubuntu feisty, and it doesn't work with python2.5 (although it works if I do 'python2.4 someapp.py', which is a pain to do when developing with an IDE). Is there gonna be an updated package for Feisty? -- Wishlist: Update python-soya package https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/117840 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
