[Bug 263121] Re: ACPI Exception causes suspend-to-disk to fail
Hi Leann, Unfortunately, I'm still running Hardy on this PC. I have been quite busy lately and haven't had the time to upgrade. Once I upgrade to Intrepid Ibex (by end of Feb.) I'll let you know. However, I doubt I'll have the time to test out Jaunty for you -- sorry :-( Andrew -- ACPI Exception causes suspend-to-disk to fail https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/263121 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 227484] Re: vmware-server 1.0.5 can't be install on ubuntu x64
METOO... this doesn't work for me, either. Same problem. -- vmware-server 1.0.5 can't be install on ubuntu x64 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/227484 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 263121] Re: ACPI Exception causes suspend-to-disk to fail
I've done something like that in the past. I'll give it a try this weekend and let you know how it goes. Andrew -- ACPI Exception causes suspend-to-disk to fail https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/263121 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 263121] Re: ACPI Exception causes suspend-to-disk to fail
Hi Leann, I'd love to try out the 2.6.27 kernel, but could I try out the kernel without doing a full Intrepid Ibex upgrade? In other words, is there a linux-image-2.6.27-generic deb available that I could install on Hardy? The reason I ask is that I've only seen this error occur twice in approx. 2 months, and compared to the number of times I suspend/hibernate (easily 3x a day), this makes it a relatively rare bug. I would have to run this kernel on my existing system for a long time to see if the behavior has gone away. Running a LiveCD won't cut it. Let me know. Andrew -- ACPI Exception causes suspend-to-disk to fail https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/263121 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 263121] [NEW] ACPI Exception causes suspend-to-disk to fail
Public bug reported: When suspending/hibernating on my HP DV2000 notebook, I have occasionally been unable to reach the powerdown state. Instead, the process would freeze and in my log I would see the following: ACPI Error when hibernating [ 5737.630814] ACPI: PCI Interrupt :05:00.0[A] - GSI 19 (level, low) - IRQ 19 [ 5737.631230] iwl3945: Radio disabled by HW RF Kill switch [ 5784.172044] ACPI: PCI Interrupt :05:00.0[A] - GSI 19 (level, low) - IRQ 19 [ 5784.172499] iwl3945: Radio disabled by HW RF Kill switch [ 5833.430076] ACPI: PCI Interrupt :05:00.0[A] - GSI 19 (level, low) - IRQ 19 [ 5833.430493] iwl3945: Radio disabled by HW RF Kill switch [ 5886.858084] ACPI: PCI Interrupt :05:00.0[A] - GSI 19 (level, low) - IRQ 19 [ 5886.858503] iwl3945: Radio disabled by HW RF Kill switch [ 5952.343700] ACPI: PCI Interrupt :05:00.0[A] - GSI 19 (level, low) - IRQ 19 [ 5952.344156] iwl3945: Radio disabled by HW RF Kill switch [ 6065.452093] ACPI: PCI Interrupt :05:00.0[A] - GSI 19 (level, low) - IRQ 19 [ 6065.452545] iwl3945: Radio disabled by HW RF Kill switch [ 6187.421133] ACPI: PCI Interrupt :05:00.0[A] - GSI 19 (level, low) - IRQ 19 [ 6187.421589] iwl3945: Radio disabled by HW RF Kill switch [ 6187.421711] irq 218, desc: c0418b80, depth: 0, count: 0, unhandled: 0 [ 6187.421717] -handle_irq(): c01687c0, handle_bad_irq+0x0/0x290 [ 6187.421731] -chip(): c03f48e0, no_irq_chip+0x0/0x40 [ 6187.421741] -action(): [ 6187.421745] IRQ_DISABLED set [ 6187.421748] IRQ_MASKED set [ 6187.421752] unexpected IRQ trap at vector da [ 6311.310078] ACPI: PCI Interrupt :05:00.0[A] - GSI 19 (level, low) - IRQ 19 [ 6311.310394] iwl3945: Radio disabled by HW RF Kill switch [ 6435.650823] ACPI: PCI Interrupt :05:00.0[A] - GSI 19 (level, low) - IRQ 19 [ 6435.651138] iwl3945: Radio disabled by HW RF Kill switch [ 6475.270605] irq 218, desc: c0418b80, depth: 0, count: 0, unhandled: 0 [ 6475.270617] -handle_irq(): c01687c0, handle_bad_irq+0x0/0x290 [ 6475.270641] -chip(): c03f48e0, no_irq_chip+0x0/0x40 [ 6475.270648] -action(): [ 6475.270651] IRQ_DISABLED set [ 6475.270654] IRQ_MASKED set [ 6475.270657] unexpected IRQ trap at vector da [ 6517.465306] ACPI: PCI Interrupt :05:00.0[A] - GSI 19 (level, low) - IRQ 19 [ 6517.465650] iwl3945: Radio disabled by HW RF Kill switch [ 6592.205786] ACPI: PCI Interrupt :05:00.0[A] - GSI 19 (level, low) - IRQ 19 [ 6592.206095] iwl3945: Radio disabled by HW RF Kill switch [ 6652.801301] irq 218, desc: c0418b80, depth: 0, count: 0, unhandled: 0 [ 6652.801313] -handle_irq(): c01687c0, handle_bad_irq+0x0/0x290 [ 6652.801327] -chip(): c03f48e0, no_irq_chip+0x0/0x40 [ 6652.801336] -action(): [ 6652.801340] IRQ_DISABLED set [ 6652.801343] IRQ_MASKED set [ 6652.801347] unexpected IRQ trap at vector da [ 6665.046806] ACPI: PCI Interrupt :05:00.0[A] - GSI 19 (level, low) - IRQ 19 [ 6665.047150] iwl3945: Radio disabled by HW RF Kill switch [ 6741.004911] ACPI: PCI Interrupt :05:00.0[A] - GSI 19 (level, low) - IRQ 19 [ 6741.005274] iwl3945: Radio disabled by HW RF Kill switch [ 6818.215670] ACPI: PCI Interrupt :05:00.0[A] - GSI 19 (level, low) - IRQ 19 [ 6818.215989] iwl3945: Radio disabled by HW RF Kill switch [ 6835.667484] irq 218, desc: c0418b80, depth: 0, count: 0, unhandled: 0 [ 6835.667497] -handle_irq(): c01687c0, handle_bad_irq+0x0/0x290 [ 6835.667511] -chip(): c03f48e0, no_irq_chip+0x0/0x40 [ 6835.667524] -action(): [ 6835.667528] IRQ_DISABLED set [ 6835.667531] IRQ_MASKED set [ 6835.667535] unexpected IRQ trap at vector da [ 6896.231456] ACPI: PCI Interrupt :05:00.0[A] - GSI 19 (level, low) - IRQ 19 [ 6896.231769] iwl3945: Radio disabled by HW RF Kill switch [ 6973.064113] ACPI: PCI Interrupt :05:00.0[A] - GSI 19 (level, low) - IRQ 19 [ 6973.065367] iwl3945: Radio disabled by HW RF Kill switch [ 7022.678323] irq 218, desc: c0418b80, depth: 0, count: 0, unhandled: 0 [ 7022.678334] -handle_irq(): c01687c0, handle_bad_irq+0x0/0x290 [ 7022.678348] -chip(): c03f48e0, no_irq_chip+0x0/0x40 [ 7022.678358] -action(): [ 7022.678362] IRQ_DISABLED set [ 7022.678365] IRQ_MASKED set [ 7022.678369] unexpected IRQ trap at vector da [ 7052.619909] ACPI: EC: acpi_ec_wait timeout, status = 2, expect_event = 1 [ 7052.619931] ACPI: EC: read timeout, command = 128 [ 7052.619943] ACPI Exception (evregion-0420): AE_TIME, Returned by Handler for [EmbeddedControl] [20070126] [ 7052.619957] ACPI Exception (dswexec-0462): AE_TIME, While resolving operands for [OpcodeName unavailable] [20070126] [ 7052.619970] ACPI Error (psparse-0537): Method parse/execution failed [\_SB_.PCI0.LPCB.EC0_.GBST] (Node f7c4c348), AE_TIME [ 7052.620050] ACPI Error (psparse-0537): Method parse/execution failed [\_SB_.PCI0.LPCB.EC0_.BAT0._BST] (Node f7c4c438), AE_TIME [ 7052.620135] ACPI Exception (battery-0356):
[Bug 263121] Re: ACPI Exception causes suspend-to-disk to fail
Oh, I'm running Ubuntu hardy with: lap$ cat /proc/acpi/info version: 20070126 lap$ uname -a Linux pixelmonkey-laptop 2.6.24-20-generic #1 SMP Thu Jun 26 18:37:43 UTC 2008 i686 GNU/Linux -- ACPI Exception causes suspend-to-disk to fail https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/263121 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 29012] Re: Downloads dialog box is blank
I thought this was a bug with firefox 2/3 on Ubuntu hardy, but it turns out it's a feature. You have to go to Edit Preferences Privacy and check off Remember what I've downloaded for items to remain in FF's download dialog. Somewhat counter-intuitive. Attaching screeny. ** Attachment added: screenshot of edit preferences privacy dialog http://launchpadlibrarian.net/14456164/screenshot.png -- Downloads dialog box is blank https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/29012 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 129908] Re: NM cannot distinguish between two networks with the same SSID at all
I'd just like to confirm this bug. On my network, I have two APs -- one is my router/gateway, and the other is a Linksys range extender. They are both using the same SSID (since that's how range extenders work), but depending where I am, one may have more strength than the other. I can see this by using iwlist eth1 scan, and I can observe which AP my card is using with iwconfig eth1, but it isn't always the case that NM picks the one with the best strength. Instead, as a workaround, when I notice that I'm losing signal on one, I killall NetworkManager and let it reconnect to the stronger one. As the OP stated, it would be nice for NM to distinguish between these two APs, and show me two signal strengths -- one for each. Further, there should be a way for me to lock onto one of them. For example, if AP1 and AP2 are both at around 55% signal strength, I may prefer a stable connection on one than bouncing around from one to another just to grab a percent or two in strength. Perhaps NM already has this kind of smarts built-in, not sure. Andrew -- NM cannot distinguish between two networks with the same SSID at all https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/129908 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 137046] Message threading has bug with unrelated e-mails with same subject
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: evolution I have three messages in my folder: messages 1, 2 and 3. Message 1 has the subject Tomorrow and was sent to me and another person. Message 2 is a reply, with subject Re: Tomorrow and was also sent to me and the original sender. Message 3 is an e-mail written 5 months ago, also with the subject Re: Tomorrow, also written to me, but the sender is not one of the senders in Messages 1 or 2. Yet, Message 3 gets threaded with Messages 1 and 2. I am attaching the messages which cause this behavior for me in a tar.gz file. Clearly the threading code is broken for some edge case caused by these messages. ProblemType: Bug Architecture: i386 Date: Mon Sep 3 14:04:24 2007 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 7.04 ExecutablePath: /usr/bin/evolution-2.10 Package: evolution 2.10.1-0ubuntu2 PackageArchitecture: i386 ProcCmdline: evolution --component=mail ProcCwd: /home/pixelmonkey ProcEnviron: SHELL=/bin/bash PATH=/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/bin:/usr/bin/X11:/usr/games LANG=en_US.UTF-8 SourcePackage: evolution Uname: Linux pixelmonkey-laptop 2.6.20-15-ref-generic #1 SMP Wed May 2 22:16:28 EDT 2007 i686 GNU/Linux ** Affects: evolution (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Message threading has bug with unrelated e-mails with same subject https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/137046 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 137046] Re: Message threading has bug with unrelated e-mails with same subject
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/9101393/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: ProcMaps.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/9101394/ProcMaps.txt ** Attachment added: ProcStatus.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/9101395/ProcStatus.txt -- Message threading has bug with unrelated e-mails with same subject https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/137046 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 137046] Re: Message threading has bug with unrelated e-mails with same subject
** Attachment added: contains three messages, which incorrectly thread together in Evolution http://launchpadlibrarian.net/9101396/email-bug-threading.tar.gz -- Message threading has bug with unrelated e-mails with same subject https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/137046 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 104470] Re: firefox crashed -- libflashplayer.so
Not really a matter of fair or not fair. This is clearly a rather nasty bug that has gone unnoticed until now. The developer of the Flash Linux plug-in seems to very knowledgeable in the sound space. Might it make sense to notify him of this bug report and its duplicates? His blog is here: http://blogs.adobe.com/penguin.swf/ I'll send him an e-mail. -- firefox crashed -- libflashplayer.so https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/104470 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 104470] Re: firefox crashed -- libflashplayer.so
I think I've worked around this bug using the FIREFOX_DSP environmental variable. You can edit /etc/firefox/firefoxrc and add FIREFOX_DSP=aoss This will use the Alsa-OSS DSP wrapper, which I know used to work nicely for me back in Breezy days. Indeed, I haven't had a Flash-related crash since setting this variable. I know there's still a deeper issue here, but this may be useful information to others. -- firefox crashed -- libflashplayer.so https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/104470 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 114833] When icon disappears, custom launcher gets huge icon
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: gnome-panel I had an icon for vmware. Then I uninstalled vmware, and therefore uninstalled the icon for vmware. The custom launcher I had in gnome- panel changed to an extremely large icon with an X in it. The size of this icon is clearly wrong. You can reproduce it by manually deleting an icon used by a launcher on your filesystem. ProblemType: Bug Architecture: i386 Date: Tue May 15 11:27:48 2007 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 7.04 ExecutablePath: /usr/bin/gnome-panel Package: gnome-panel 1:2.18.1-0ubuntu3.1 PackageArchitecture: i386 ProcCmdline: gnome-panel --sm-client-id default1 ProcCwd: /home/pixelmonkey ProcEnviron: SHELL=/bin/bash PATH=/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/bin:/usr/bin/X11:/usr/games LANG=en_US.UTF-8 SourcePackage: gnome-panel Uname: Linux pixelmonkey-laptop 2.6.20-15-ref-generic #1 SMP Wed May 2 22:16:28 EDT 2007 i686 GNU/Linux ** Affects: gnome-panel (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: Unconfirmed -- When icon disappears, custom launcher gets huge icon https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/114833 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 114833] Re: When icon disappears, custom launcher gets huge icon
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://librarian.launchpad.net/7651714/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: ProcMaps.txt http://librarian.launchpad.net/7651715/ProcMaps.txt ** Attachment added: ProcStatus.txt http://librarian.launchpad.net/7651716/ProcStatus.txt -- When icon disappears, custom launcher gets huge icon https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/114833 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 58128] Re: my microphone doesn't work in my Intel Corporation 82801G (ICH7 Family)
I'm on a HP DV2000 laptop, which I think has the same sound hardware. I can CONFIRM that microphone input does not work for me (despite volumes being set) and that volume is much lower than windows, just as the original reporter says. I wonder what layer this bug is at? Any advice for debugging? -- my microphone doesn't work in my Intel Corporation 82801G (ICH7 Family) https://launchpad.net/bugs/58128 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
